high-spin consequences of octupole shape in nuclei around
TRANSCRIPT
VOLUME53, NUMBER21 P H Y S I C A L R E V I E W L E T T E R S 19 NOVEMBER 1984
ERRATA
High-Spin Consequences of Octupole Shape in Nuclei around 222Th. W. NAZAREWICZ, P. OLAN-
DERS, I. RAGNARSSON, J. DUDEK, and G. A.
LEANDER [Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1272 (1984)].
A phase error in the computer code affected details of the results for ft^O and o> > 0 . The numerical values of V, (rr), and (jx) that are quoted in the text are thus somewhat inaccurate. In the lower part of Fig. 2, the lowest s = / orbital should have more alignment, leading to a simplex inversion at #w = 0.1 MeV and a large- V band crossing already at #a>=0.2 MeV. Correspondingly, the solid theoretical curve in Fig. 3 adheres more closely to the solid experimental points, at all rotational frequencies, after correction of the phase error.
Femtosecond Orientational Relaxation of Pho-toexcited Carriers in GaAs. J. L. OUDAR,
A. MlGUS, D. HULIN, G. GRILLON, J. ETCHEPARE, and A. ANTONETTI [Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 384 (1984)].
There is a typographical error in Eq. (6), which should read
e = s in2i / / [ (p/p 0 ) - l ] /4 . (6)
Magnetic Field-Line Reconnection in a Toroidal Plasma. S. IIZUKA, Y. MINAMITANI, H. TANACA,
and Y. KIWAMOTO [Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 918 (1984)].
The right-hand side of the second equation of
Eqs^ (3) should be q. In the line following Eqs. (3), v • V should be replaced by v- V.
Derivation of the Optical Constants of Gold from Transmission Diffraction Measurements in the 280-640-eV Range. R. TATCHYN, I. LINDAU,
E. KALLNE, and E. SPILLER [Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1264 (1984)].
The following acknowledgment was inadvertently omitted.
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation through Grant No. DMR 81-0431. The experiments were performed at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory which is supported by the U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, and the National Science Foundation, Division of Materials Research.
Resonant Microwave Absorption of Selected DNA Molecules. G. S. EDWARDS, C. C. DAVIS, J. D. SAFFER, and M. L. SWICORD [Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1284 (1984)].
The equation on page 1286 is incorrect. The correct form is
(« + l)ucircular = W, (n + ~)vVme&r = vL
Note also that the plasmid used is 2740-bp long (not 2734) and the fragment referred to as 1786-bp long is in fact 1792-bp long. None of these errors affect any of the conclusions drawn in the paper.
2060