high temperature combined sensible-latent thermal … · • a combined sensible-latent molten salt...
TRANSCRIPT
Pierre Garcia, Jérôme Pouvreau | Thermal Energy Storage Laboratory
HIGH TEMPERATURE COMBINED SENSIBLE-LATENT THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE
SolarPACES 2018, Casablanca, Morocco
| 2
January 2017 – December 2020
Developing and integrating new innovative material solutions into CSP technology
to increase the efficiency and decrease the energy production cost
IN POWER H2020 PROJECT
self-healing and anti-
soiling coated mirrors
optimized mirror support structurehigh-temperature absorber coating
high-temperature TES
materials and designs
To operate with high
efficiency cycles
working at 600°C
SolarPACES 2018, Casablanca | Pierre Garcia
| 3
INNOVATIVE TES SYSTEMS
HTF = MOLTEN SALTS (OR GAS)
High thermal capacity molten
salts in thermocline tanks
High storage density
Encapsulated PCM top layer
Temperature stabilization during discharge
Increase of the utilization rate
300°C
to
600°C
HTF = Molten Salt / Air
Thot = 600°C
Tcold = 300°C
Solar field Power
block
SolarPACES 2018, Casablanca | Pierre Garcia
High-temp
PCM Layer
575°C
| 4
INNOVATIVE TES SYSTEMS
DIRECT STEAM GENERATION
MS-steam
HX
PCM
Storage
300°C
Thermocline
with PCM
HTF = water / steam
Solar field Power
block
Thot = 550/600°C
Tcold = 250°C
High thermal
capacity molten salts
in thermocline tanks
Encapsulated
PCM top layer
Mid-Temperature PCM
steam storage
SolarPACES 2018, Casablanca | Pierre Garcia
| 5
• Literature review
COMBINED SENSIBLE-LATENT TES
& HIGH TEMPERATURE PCM
SolarPACES 2018, Casablanca | Pierre Garcia
Dual media thermocline tank with PCM
Solar Salt + KOH (Galione 2015)
TES-integrated steam generator
NaK+ AlSi (Kotze, 2012)
Rock bed TES with PCM top layer
Air + AlSi (Zanganeh, 2015)
Steel slag packed-bed TES with PCM top layer
Air + AlSi (Hernandez, 2017)
Heat pipe and PCM TES prototype
Na + AlSi (Rea, 2017)
| 6
TES materials requirements
• high energy density per kg or per m3
• high thermal conductivity
• process-adapted temperature ranges
• low cost and high environmental
performance
• mechanical and chemical stability
• chemical compatibility with heat
exchanger and/or container
PCM SELECTION
Aluminum silicon (AlSi12)
hfus = 466 kJ/kg
Λ = 160 W/(m.K)
Tfus = 575°C
best environmental performance [Khare, 2012]
stable through several heating and cooling cycles [Li, 2011]
innovative anti-corrosive layers under development at CEA
are currently tested to avoid creep corrosion.?
SolarPACES 2018, Casablanca | Pierre Garcia
Superior
properties as
PCM for CSP
applications
| 7
• 1D dynamic model of combined sensible-latent TES system
• Thermal transfer by conduction and convection in axial direction
• Measured thermo-physical properties of the storage media
• Heat losses to the environment.
• Developed using Modelica language within the Dymola
platform
• Extension of single / dual media thermocline models
• Addition of a top PCM layer
• Main assumptions
• PCM and steel capsules are considered as a unique material• using equivalent values of cp(T), λ(T), and ρ
• Thermal gradients inside solids (PCM capsules and optional
filler rocks) are considered negligible•
• Radiative heat transfers are neglected
MODEL DESCRIPTION
SolarPACES 2018, Casablanca | Pierre Garcia
Bi =h∙L
λ< 0,1
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0 200 400 600 800
Spec
ific
en
thal
py
(kJ.
kg)
Temperature ( C)
Specific enthalpy of
AlSi capsules (kJ/kg)
| 8
• No experimental facility of molten salt thermocline storage with PCM top layer
• Validation with experimental data from a combined sensible latent packed bed
tank of rocks and AlSi12 with air as HTF (Zanganeh, 2015)
• Model results = continuous lines vs. Experimental data = dots
• Quite good agreement for both latent and sensible section
• Radiative heat transfers are neglected: source of deviations?
MODEL VALIDATION
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 2 4 6 8
Tem
per
atu
re (
°C)
Time (h)
m_Tintop m_TR1 m_TR2 m_TR3
m_TR4 s_Tintop s_TR1 s_TR2
s_TR3 s_TR4
550
560
570
580
590
600
610
620
630
640
650
1,5 2,5 3,5 4,5
Tem
per
atu
re (°
C)
Time (h)
m_TF1 s_Tf1 m_TPCM1 s_TPCM1
m_Tf3 s_Tf3 m_TPCM3 s_TPCM3
SolarPACES 2018, Casablanca | Pierre Garcia
Packed bed
and inlet (top)
temperatures
sensible section
PCM and air
temperatures
latent section
| 9
Design parameter Unit Value
Hot temperature °C 600
Cold temperature °C 290
Design mass flow kg/s 34.9
Design salt mass tons 754
Tank volume m3 630
STORAGE DESIGN
SolarPACES 2018, Casablanca | Pierre Garcia
• Reference design of a 90 MWhth molten salt thermocline tank
• Molten salt (Solar Salt, 60% NaNO3 and 40% KNO3) single media thermocline tank
• In Power TES preliminary design model
• Different amounts of PCM (AlSi) for the same total tank volume
H = 14 m
D = 7.57 m
| 10
• Simulated outlet temperatures profile in discharge• Constant tank volume• For TES subjected to the same charge and discharge conditions
• Same inlet temperatures and flow rates, final charging outlet temperature (350°C)
PARAMETRIC STUDY (1/2)
500
510
520
530
540
550
560
570
580
590
600
0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5 4,0 4,5 5,0
Ou
tlet
tem
per
atu
re (
°C)
Discharging time (h)
No PCM 1% 5% 10% 15% 20%
500
510
520
530
540
550
560
570
580
590
600
0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5 4,0 4,5 5,0 5,5 6,0
Ou
tlet
tem
per
atu
re (
°C)
Discharging time (h)
No PCM 1% 5% 10% 15% 20%
SolarPACES 2018, Casablanca | Pierre Garcia
TES charged at 585°C TES charged at 600°C
• No significant improvement beyond 5% or 10% PCM volume
• Decreased outlet temperature during the first period of the discharge
• Increased outlet temperature in the second part of the discharge• for outlet temperature below 570°C
+12% +10%
| 11
• A key performance parameter: temperature degradation in discharge
• ΔTdeg = Tin0, charge –Tout, discharge
• Restrictive parameter for the downstream component of the facility (power block,
process heat consumer, …)
• Relevant criterion to define the end of discharge
PARAMETRIC STUDY (2/2)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Dis
char
ged
th
erm
al e
ner
gy (
MW
h)
Temperature degradation in discharge (K)
0% PCM 1% PCM 5% PCM
10% PCM 15% PCM 20% PCMSolarPACES 2018, Casablanca | Pierre Garcia
Tank charged at 600°C
60 MWhth
72 MWhth
| 12
• Safety concerns about compatibility between high temperature PCM and
molten salts
• Contact between molten aluminum and nitrates or other oxidizers may cause an explosion
• No experience of similar TES system in the literature
PCM AND SALT COMPATIBILITY
SolarPACES 2018, Casablanca | Pierre Garcia
From Solar Field
air-steam
HX
PCM
Storage
300°C
To Power Block
To Solar Field From Power Block
Regenerator
with PCM
Air Loop
• Three options to be considered
• Mitigate the leakage risk of AlSi capsules
within the salt
• Change the PCM• Back-up solutions have been identified, but with
lower performance
• Use the PCM in alternative regenerative-type
TES for DSG applications• Air loop instead of molten salt loop
| 13SolarPACES 2018, Casablanca | Pierre Garcia
• A combined sensible-latent molten salt thermocline concept is proposed
• Limiting outlet temperature degradation during discharge• Discharge time increased by 12% with 10% PCM layer
• Increased storage density compared to a sensible only thermocline TES
• AlSi / molten salt compatibility is a critical issue
• Further model validation
• ENEA’s model used for inter-comparison purposes
• Experimental tests of the In Power TES components• molten salt at ENEA
• PCM at CEA
• TES design optimization
• Integration of a cost-performance model • to determine the unit cost of storage capacity (€/kWh)
• TES sizing for commercial scale CSP plants• optimization of tank geometry, PCM fraction and operating strategies
FIRST CONCLUSIONS
| 14
• High Temperature PCM (AlSi12)
• Development and test of protective coatings• AlSi is very corrosive for stainless steel container at high temperature
• Ageing and thermal cycling (AlSi+substrate+coating) for selected coating
ON-GOING AND FUTURE WORK
PCM DURABILITY TESTS
• PCM for DSG applications (NaN03)
• Determination of the corrosion rate of metals
(tubes and container) by NaNO3
• Measurement techniques• Tubes and fins analysis
• Metal loss rate assessment (weight, thickness)
• XRD measurements
• Salt composition
• ICP-AES spectrometry
• Ionic chromatography
• Cp measurement
• Gas composition
• O2 / N2 content
SolarPACES 2018, Casablanca | Pierre Garcia
LHASSA facility
pilot scale testing
DURASSEL facility
analytical testing
Commissariat à l’énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives
17 rue des Martyrs | 38054 Grenoble Cedex
www-liten.cea.fr
Établissement public à caractère industriel et commercial | RCS Paris B 775 685 019
THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION
MERCI POUR VOTRE ATTENTION
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This project has received funding
from the European Union’s
Horizon 2020 research and
innovation programme under
grant agreement No 720749.
REFERENCES
P.A. Galione, C.D. Pérez-Segarra, I. Rodriguez, S. Torras, J. Rigola, Solar Energy 119 (2015) 134–150.
J.P. Kotzé, T.W. von Backström, P.J. Erens, High temperature thermal energy storage utilizing metallic
phase change materials and metallic heat transfer fluids, J.Sol. Energy Eng. ASME 135 (2013).
G. Zanganeh, R. Khanna, C. Walser, A. Pedretti, A. Haselbacher, and A. Steinfeld, Sol. Energy, 114,
(2015) 77–90.
A.B. Hernández, I. Ortega-Fernández, I. Uriz, A. Ortuondo, I. Loroño, J. Rodriguez-Aseguinolaza, in AIP
Conference Proceedings of the 23rd SolarPACES Symposium, Santiago de Chile 1850, (2017).
J. E. Rea, C. Oshman, C. L. Hardin, A. Singh, J. Alleman, G. Glatzmaier, P. A. Parilla, M.L. Olsen, J.
Sharp, N. P. Siegel, E. S. Toberer, D. S. Ginley, Experimental Demonstration of a Latent Heat Storage
System for Dispatchable Electricity, in AIP Conference Proceedings of the 23rd SolarPACES
Symposium, Santiago de Chile 1850 (2017).
S. Khare, M. Dell’Amico, C. Knight, S. McGarry, Solar Energy Mat. and Solar Cells107 (2012) 20–27.
F. Li, Y. Hu, R. Zhang, The influence of heating-cooling cycles on the thermal storage performances of
Al-17% Si alloy, Adv. Mater.Res. 239-242 (2011) 2248-2251.