high throughput genotoxicity profiling of the us epa toxcast tm chemical library

1
High Throughput Genotoxicity Profiling of the US EPA ToxCast High Throughput Genotoxicity Profiling of the US EPA ToxCast TM TM Chemical Library Chemical Library S Little S Little 1 1 , AW Knight , AW Knight 2 2 , L Birrell , L Birrell 2 2 , G Akerman , G Akerman 3 3 , N McCarroll , N McCarroll 3 3 , D Dix , D Dix 1 1 , K Houck , K Houck 1 1 , R , R Judson Judson 1 1 , R Kavlock , R Kavlock 1 1 , M Martin , M Martin 1 1 , A Richard , A Richard 1 1 , C Yang , C Yang 4 4 , , RM Walmsley RM Walmsley 2 2 1 National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research & Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC , 2 Gentronix Ltd., CTF Building, 46 Grafton Street, Manchester, UK, 3 Health Effects Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW (MC 7509P), Washington, DC , 4 Office of Food Additive Safety, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U. S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, Maryland 20740. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation by EPA for use. This work was reviewed by EPA and approved for publication but does not necessarily reflect official Agency policy. INTRODUCTION METHODS CONCLUSIONS Assay Statistics The number of positive results for genotoxicity was similar between the 3 assays, averaging just over 10%. Whereas the GreenScreen HC, CellCiphr p53 and CellSensor p53 assays produced similar numbers of positive results (32, 27 and 36 respectively), the overlap between data sets was reasonably small. The number of positive GreenScreen HC results that were common to CellCiphr p53 and CellSensor p53 assays were 6 and 9, respectively. There were 11 CellCipher p53 positive assay results that were common to CellSensor p53. The historical Ames test data had 46 positive results for 108 tested compounds. Correlation with rodent bioassay The HTS assays have a lower number of true positive results compared to the Ames assay due to lower sensitivity, a tradeoff for the advantage of screening large numbers of compounds with low sample concentration requirements. The Ames assay predicts a greater percentage of true positives (higher sensitivity), but it also produces a larger percentage of false positives (or smaller percentage of correct negatives), i.e. lower specificity. Conversely the HTS assays demonstrated high specificity, consistently over 88%, and hence produce a low number of what may be construed as false positive results. Overall strategic learning The present analysis suggests that HTS genotoxicity assays could be used as an in vitro screen for potentially genotoxic compounds. As one part of a weight-of-evidence assessment, the data could be applied to judge the likelihood of a compound’s potential adverse effect for humans, to help determine the mode of action for carcinogenicity, to enhance the process of prioritization by selecting compounds for further study. REFERENCES A key aim of the ToxCast TM project 1 is to investigate the use of modern high-throughput screening (HTS) assays to provide a biologically informed basis for predicting toxicity and prioritizing chemicals for further testing. The purpose of this study is to evaluate recently developed HTS methodologies from Gentronix Ltd., Cellumen Inc., and Invitrogen Corp., the latter performed by the National Institutes of Health Chemical Genomics Center (NCGC), in the context of the particular chemical space and larger aims of the ToxCast TM project. These assays each indicate different aspects of the cellular response to a genotoxic challenge, which can lead to DNA damage, mis- repair and mutations and, ultimately, to tumorigenesis and carcinogenesis. The Gentronix ‘GreenScreen HC’ assay 2 uses a human lymphoblastoid TK6 cell line genetically modified to include a green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter for the human GADD45a gene. The Cellumen ‘CellCiphr’ cytotoxicity profile panel 3 includes fluorescent probes for 10 cellular responses including DNA damage in human HepG2 cells as measured by p53 activation using fluorescent anti-p53 antibody. The Invitrogen ‘CellSensor’ assay 4 uses a beta-lactamase reporter gene under the control of a p53 response elements stable integrated in HCT-116 cells and measured via fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET). These HTS assays represent two gene targets in their endpoints, p53 and GADD45a in a p53 competent cell line. P53 is known to act as a ‘gate keeper’ to ensure genetic and cellular integrity during the cell cycle. GADD45a (growth arrest and DNA damage) mediates the cell’s response to genotoxic stress. The HTS assay results were combined with the ToxCast TM Phase I compound data set. This set consists of 320 primarily pesticidal active compounds for which hazard assessment toxicological data, including multisite tumorigenicity data, are available from the US EPA Office of Pesticide Programs. HTS assay results are also compared with historical mutagenicity (Ames) data available for a subset of the test compounds. The purpose of these HTS assays is not to replace the use of Ames tests, but to increase testing efficiency for early screening of larger sets of chemicals of interest. (1) EPA ToxCast, 2009. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s National Center for Computational Toxicology ToxCast Project, http:// www.epa.gov/ncct/toxcast ; Accessed January 2009. (2) Knight A.W., Birrell L., Walmsley R.M., 2009. Development and validation of a higher throughput screening approach to genotoxicity testing using the GADD45a-GFP GreenScreen HC assay. J. Biomol. Scr. 14, 16-30. (3) Vernetti, L., W. Irwin, K.A. Giuliano, A. Gough, P. Johnston and D.L. Taylor, 2009. Cellular Systems Biology Applied to Pre-Clinical Safety Testing: A Case Study of CellCiphr Cytotoxicity Profiling, in Drug Efficacy, Safety and Biologics Discovery: Emerging Technologies and Tools, J.J. Xu and S. Ekins, Editors. Wiley and Sons (ISBN: 978-0-470-22555-4). (4) Invitrogen, 2009. CellSensor™ p53RE-bla HCT-116 Cell-based Assay Protocol. http://tools.invitrogen.com/content/sfs/manuals/cellsensor_p53HCT116_man.pdf, Accessed January 2009. Assay Genotoxicity Cytotoxicity Number % Number % GreenScreen HC 32 10.4 231 74.8 CellCiphr p53 27 8.7 171 55.3 CellSensor p53 36 11.7 - - GreenScreen + GreenScreen - Rodent + 13 45 Rodent - 16 199 Cellciphr + Cellciphr - Rodent + 8 50 Rodent - 18 197 CellSensor + CellSensor - Rodent + 10 48 Rodent - 23 192 Ames + Ames - Rodent + 14 14 Rodent - 22 40 Concordance with Multiple Site Rodent Tumorigenicity Data Summary of HTS predicted positive assay data Replicate Sample Reproducibility HTS Methods Comparison 1.29 1.06 1.08 1.19 R elative Predictivity (N egatives) 1.41 1.65 1.61 3.01 R elative Predicitivity (Positives) 57.3 52.7 53.3 57.5 B alanced A ccuracy 60.0 75.1 74.0 77.7 C oncordance 64.5 91.6 89.3 92.6 Specificity (% correctnegatives) 50.0 13.8 17.2 22.4 Sensitivity (% correctpositives) 90 273 273 273 N um berofcom parisons Am es C ellC iphr C ellSensor G reenScreen 1.29 1.06 1.08 1.19 R elative Predictivity (N egatives) 1.41 1.65 1.61 3.01 R elative Predicitivity (Positives) 57.3 52.7 53.3 57.5 B alanced A ccuracy 60.0 75.1 74.0 77.7 C oncordance 64.5 91.6 89.3 92.6 Specificity (% correctnegatives) 50.0 13.8 17.2 22.4 Sensitivity (% correctpositives) 90 273 273 273 N um berofcom parisons Am es C ellC iphr C ellSensor G reenScreen G reenScreen H C C ellC iphrp53 C ellSensorp53 Endpoints G enotoxicity /C ytotoxicity G enotoxicity /C ytotoxicity Genotoxicity M icroplate 96 w ell 384 w ell 1536 w ell Num berofcom pounds /plate 12 16 1408 Num berofdilutions /com pound 3 10 12 (in 12 m icroplates) Incubation tim e /hr 24 and 48 24 to 72 24 Com pounds perw eek (typical) 720 100 -500 30,000 -100,000 Equipmentrequired Conventional m icroplate reader(Tecan Infinite F500) Im age analysis equipm ent (ArrayScan) M icrolitre liquid handling autom ation on ultra-high throughputrobotic platform s D ata interpretation Straightforw ard and autom ated -using proprietary Excel softw are template Specialistim age analysis softw are -1 of10 endpoints therefore data extraction required Straightforw ard and autom ated -using proprietary softw are. Som e userinputto identify artifacts R eagents Proprietary cell lines and m edia from Gentronix Proprietary cell lines and m edia from M illipore Proprietary cell lines and m edia from Invitrogen GreenScreen HC CellCiphr p53 CellSensor p53 2 4 7 9 19 12 18 Overlap of HTS predicted positive genotoxicity assay data Chem icalNam e CAS Num ber R eplicate # Source Purity (% ) G enotoxicity C ytotoxicity G enotoxicity C ytotoxicity 3-Iodo-2-propynylbutylcarbamate 55406-53-6 1 C rescent 97 + + + + + + 2 Sigma 97.1 + + + + + + Bensulide 741-58-2 1 Sigma 99.5 - + + - + 2 Sigma 99.5 - + + - + 3 Sigma 99.5 - + + - + C hlorsulfuron 64902-72-3 1 C rescent 99 - - - - 2 Sigma 99.9 - - - - D ibutyl phthalate 84-74-2 1 Sigma 99.63 - + + - + 2 Alfa_Aesar 98.6 - + - + Diclofop-methyl 51338-27-3 1 Sigma 99.2 - + + - - 2 Sigma 99.2 - + + - + 3 Sigma 99.2 - + + - + EPTC 759-94-4 1 Sigma 98.7 - - - - 2 C rescent 97 - - - - Fenoxaprop-ethyl 66441-23-4 1 C rescent 98 - + + - + 2 Sigma 98.4 - + + - + Prosulfuron 94125-34-5 1 Sigma 98.4 - - - - 2 Sigma 98.4 - + - - 3 Sigma 98.4 - - - - G reenS creen H C C ellC iphrp53 G A D D 45 p53 W T1 M ax IR ATM M M S,UV, O ther G enotoxins H yperosm otic Stress IL-1,TN F receptors M itogenic Stim uli c-m yc Cdc2/Cyclin JN K ATR Chrom atin Remodeling p38 PCNA O ct1 & N F-Y BRCA1 -catenin Starvation, H ypoxia O xidative Stress NF- B GGR M itosis m ediation ofp38 dependentapoptosis? Zbrk1 Accessibility to D am aged D N A APC complex A nti-tum origenesis C ell m igration and invasion G 2/M C ellC ycle Arrest D N A R epair (for replicate compounds randomly distributed in the compound library) Cellum en, Inc. Invitrogen Corp. G reenScreen H C GADD45-GFP CellCiphrp53 CellSensorp53R E-bla TK6 cellline w ith G AD D 45 - G FP reporterstrain and a control strain notproducing G FP (to correctforautofluorescence). •M easurem entsat24 and 48 hrs. •Three serialdilutionsof200, 100 and 50 M •Induction ofcellularfluorescence indicative ofgenotoxicity •Cytotoxicity quantified by reduction in cellularproliferation,m easured by absorbance •The p53 assay is one ofa setof10 cellularresponsesin H epG2 cells. •U sesa anti-p53-antibody, nine 2-fold dilutions, 3 tim e points •M easurem entofdifferential stainingsvia A rrayscan H CS reader H CT-116 cellsw ith stably integrated beta-lactam ase reportergene and p53 response elem ent Cell Cycle C SK Integrity DNA Dam age Oxidative Stress Stress Pathw ay Activation Organelle Functions

Upload: phyre

Post on 15-Jan-2016

19 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

High Throughput Genotoxicity Profiling of the US EPA ToxCast TM Chemical Library. GreenScreen HC. CellCiphr p53. 4. 12. 19. 2. 7. 9. 18. CellSensor p53. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: High Throughput Genotoxicity Profiling of the US EPA ToxCast TM  Chemical Library

High Throughput Genotoxicity Profiling of the US EPA ToxCastHigh Throughput Genotoxicity Profiling of the US EPA ToxCastTMTM Chemical Library Chemical Library S LittleS Little11, AW Knight, AW Knight22, L Birrell, L Birrell22, G Akerman, G Akerman33, N McCarroll, N McCarroll33, D Dix, D Dix11, K Houck, K Houck11, R Judson, R Judson11, , R KavlockR Kavlock11, M Martin, M Martin11, A Richard, A Richard11, C Yang, C Yang44 , , RM WalmsleyRM Walmsley22

1 National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research & Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC , 2 Gentronix Ltd., CTF Building, 46 Grafton Street, Manchester, UK, 3 Health Effects Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW (MC 7509P), Washington, DC , 4 Office of Food Additive Safety, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U. S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, Maryland 20740.

Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation by EPA for use.This work was reviewed by EPA and approved for publication but does not necessarily reflect official Agency policy.

INTRODUCTION METHODS

CONCLUSIONSAssay Statistics The number of positive results for genotoxicity was similar between the 3 assays, averaging just over 10%. Whereas the GreenScreen HC, CellCiphr p53 and CellSensor p53 assays produced similar numbers of positive results (32, 27 and 36 respectively), the overlap between data sets was reasonably small. The number of positive GreenScreen HC results that were common to CellCiphr p53 and CellSensor p53 assays were 6 and 9, respectively. There were 11 CellCipher p53 positive assay results that were common to CellSensor p53. The historical Ames test data had 46 positive results for 108 tested compounds.

Correlation with rodent bioassay The HTS assays have a lower number of true positive results compared to the Ames assay due to lower sensitivity, a tradeoff for the advantage of screening large numbers of compounds with low sample concentration requirements. The Ames assay predicts a greater percentage of true positives (higher sensitivity), but it also produces a larger percentage of false positives (or smaller percentage of correct negatives), i.e. lower specificity. Conversely the HTS assays demonstrated high specificity, consistently over 88%, and hence produce a low number of what may be construed as false positive results.

Overall strategic learning The present analysis suggests that HTS genotoxicity assays could be used as an in vitro screen for potentially genotoxic compounds. As one part of a weight-of-evidence assessment, the data could be applied to judge the likelihood of a compound’s potential adverse effect for humans, to help determine the mode of action for carcinogenicity, to enhance the process of prioritization by selecting compounds for further study.

REFERENCES

A key aim of the ToxCastTM project1 is to investigate the use of modern high-throughput screening (HTS) assays to provide a biologically informed basis for predicting toxicity and prioritizing chemicals for further testing. The purpose of this study is to evaluate recently developed HTS methodologies from Gentronix Ltd., Cellumen Inc., and Invitrogen Corp., the latter performed by the National Institutes of Health Chemical Genomics Center (NCGC), in the context of the particular chemical space and larger aims of the ToxCastTM project. These assays each indicate different aspects of the cellular response to a genotoxic challenge, which can lead to DNA damage, mis-repair and mutations and, ultimately, to tumorigenesis and carcinogenesis. The Gentronix ‘GreenScreen HC’ assay2 uses a human lymphoblastoid TK6 cell line genetically modified to include a green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter for the human GADD45a gene. The Cellumen ‘CellCiphr’ cytotoxicity profile panel3 includes fluorescent probes for 10 cellular responses including DNA damage in human HepG2 cells as measured by p53 activation using fluorescent anti-p53 antibody. The Invitrogen ‘CellSensor’ assay4 uses a beta-lactamase reporter gene under the control of a p53 response elements stable integrated in HCT-116 cells and measured via fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET). These HTS assays represent two gene targets in their endpoints, p53 and GADD45a in a p53 competent cell line. P53 is known to act as a ‘gate keeper’ to ensure genetic and cellular integrity during the cell cycle. GADD45a (growth arrest and DNA damage) mediates the cell’s response to genotoxic stress. The HTS assay results were combined with the ToxCastTM Phase I compound data set. This set consists of 320 primarily pesticidal active compounds for which hazard assessment toxicological data, including multisite tumorigenicity data, are available from the US EPA Office of Pesticide Programs. HTS assay results are also compared with historical mutagenicity (Ames) data available for a subset of the test compounds. The purpose of these HTS assays is not to replace the use of Ames tests, but to increase testing efficiency for early screening of larger sets of chemicals of interest.

(1) EPA ToxCast, 2009. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s National Center for Computational Toxicology ToxCast Project, http://www.epa.gov/ncct/toxcast; Accessed January 2009.(2) Knight A.W., Birrell L., Walmsley R.M., 2009. Development and validation of a higher throughput screening approach to genotoxicity testing using the GADD45a-GFP GreenScreen HC assay. J.

Biomol. Scr. 14, 16-30.(3) Vernetti, L., W. Irwin, K.A. Giuliano, A. Gough, P. Johnston and D.L. Taylor, 2009. Cellular Systems Biology Applied to Pre-Clinical Safety Testing: A Case Study of CellCiphr Cytotoxicity

Profiling, in Drug Efficacy, Safety and Biologics Discovery: Emerging Technologies and Tools, J.J. Xu and S. Ekins, Editors. Wiley and Sons (ISBN: 978-0-470-22555-4).(4) Invitrogen, 2009. CellSensor™ p53RE-bla HCT-116 Cell-based Assay Protocol. http://tools.invitrogen.com/content/sfs/manuals/cellsensor_p53HCT116_man.pdf, Accessed January 2009.

Assay Genotoxicity Cytotoxicity

Number % Number %

GreenScreen HC 32 10.4 231 74.8

CellCiphr p53 27 8.7 171 55.3

CellSensor p53 36 11.7 - -

GreenScreen + GreenScreen -

Rodent + 13 45

Rodent - 16 199

Cellciphr + Cellciphr -

Rodent + 8 50

Rodent - 18 197

CellSensor + CellSensor -

Rodent + 10 48

Rodent - 23 192

Ames + Ames -

Rodent + 14 14

Rodent - 22 40

Concordance with Multiple Site Rodent Tumorigenicity Data

Summary of HTS predicted positive assay data

Replicate Sample Reproducibility

HTS Methods Comparison

1.291.061.081.19Relative Predictivity (Negatives)

1.411.651.613.01Relative Predicitivity (Positives)

57.352.753.357.5Balanced Accuracy

60.075.174.077.7Concordance

64.591.689.392.6Specificity (% correct negatives)

50.013.817.222.4Sensitivity (% correct positives)

90273273273Number of comparisons

AmesCellCiphrCellSensorGreenScreen

1.291.061.081.19Relative Predictivity (Negatives)

1.411.651.613.01Relative Predicitivity (Positives)

57.352.753.357.5Balanced Accuracy

60.075.174.077.7Concordance

64.591.689.392.6Specificity (% correct negatives)

50.013.817.222.4Sensitivity (% correct positives)

90273273273Number of comparisons

AmesCellCiphrCellSensorGreenScreen

GreenScreen HC CellCiphr p53 CellSensor p53Endpoints Genotoxicity / Cytotoxicity Genotoxicity / Cytotoxicity GenotoxicityMicroplate 96 well 384 well 1536 wellNumber of compounds / plate 12 16 1408Number of dilutions / compound 3 10 12 (in 12 microplates)Incubation time / hr 24 and 48 24 to 72 24Compounds per week (typical) 720 100 - 500 30,000 - 100,000Equipment required Conventional microplate

reader (Tecan Infinite F500)Image analysis equipment

(ArrayScan)Microlitre liquid handling automation on ultra-high

throughput robotic platforms

Data interpretation Straightforward and automated - using

proprietary Excel software template

Specialist image analysis software - 1 of 10 endpoints

therefore data extraction required

Straightforward and automated - using

proprietary software. Some user input to identify

artifactsReagents Proprietary cell lines and media from Gentronix

Proprietary cell lines and media from Millipore

Proprietary cell lines and media from Invitrogen

GreenScreen HC CellCiphr p53

CellSensor p53

2

4

7 9

19 12

18

Overlap of HTS predicted positive genotoxicity assay data

ChemicalName CAS Number Rep

licat

e #

So

urc

e

Pu

rity

(%

)

Gen

oto

xici

ty

Cyt

oto

xici

ty

Gen

oto

xici

ty

Cyt

oto

xici

ty

3-Iodo-2-propynylbutylcarbamate 55406-53-6 1 Crescent 97 + + + + + +2 Sigma 97.1 + + + + + +

Bensulide 741-58-2 1 Sigma 99.5 - + + - +2 Sigma 99.5 - + + - +3 Sigma 99.5 - + + - +

Chlorsulfuron 64902-72-3 1 Crescent 99 - - - -2 Sigma 99.9 - - - -

Dibutyl phthalate 84-74-2 1 Sigma 99.63 - + + - +2 Alfa_Aesar 98.6 - + - +

Diclofop-methyl 51338-27-3 1 Sigma 99.2 - + + - -2 Sigma 99.2 - + + - +3 Sigma 99.2 - + + - +

EPTC 759-94-4 1 Sigma 98.7 - - - -2 Crescent 97 - - - -

Fenoxaprop-ethyl 66441-23-4 1 Crescent 98 - + + - +2 Sigma 98.4 - + + - +

Prosulfuron 94125-34-5 1 Sigma 98.4 - - - -2 Sigma 98.4 - + - -3 Sigma 98.4 - - - -

GreenScreen HC CellCiphr p53

GADD45

p53

WT1 Max

IR

ATM

MMS,UV,Other Genotoxins

HyperosmoticStress

IL-1, TNFreceptors

MitogenicStimuli

c-myc

Cdc2/Cyclin

JNK

ATR

ChromatinRemodeling

p38

PCNA

Oct1 & NF-Y

BRCA1

-catenin

Starvation,Hypoxia

OxidativeStressNF-B

GGRMitosis

mediation of p38dependent apoptosis?

Zbrk1

Accessibility toDamaged DNA

APCcomplex

Anti-tumorigenesis

Cell migrationand invasion

G2/M Cell Cycle ArrestDNA Repair

(for replicate compounds randomly distributed in the compound library)

Cellumen, Inc.

Invitrogen Corp.

GreenScreen HC GADD45-GFP

CellCiphr p53

CellSensor p53RE-bla

TK6 cell line with GADD45-GFP reporter strain and a control strain not producing GFP ( to correct for autofluorescence).

•Measurements at 24 and 48 hrs.•Three serial dilutions of 200, 100 and 50 M•Induction of cellular fluorescence indicative of genotoxicity•Cytotoxicity quantified by reduction in cellular proliferation, measured by absorbance

•The p53 assay is one of a set of 10 cellular responses in HepG2 cells.•Uses a anti-p53-antibody, nine 2-fold dilutions, 3 time points•Measurement of differential stainings via Arrayscan HCS reader

HCT-116 cells with stably integrated beta-lactamasereporter gene and p53 response element

Cell Cycle

CSK Integrity

DNA Damage

Oxidative Stress

Stress PathwayActivation

OrganelleFunctions

Cell CycleCell Cycle

CSK Integrity CSK Integrity

DNA DamageDNA Damage

Oxidative Stress

Stress PathwayActivation

OrganelleFunctions