higher education_campus_mobilization_
TRANSCRIPT
+ Tennessee Board of Regents
Mobilization of Higher Education
mTBR
Robbie K. MeltonAssociate Vice ChancellorTennessee Board of Regents eLearning
www.TBReLearning.org
Apps
Tablets
SmartPhones
eReaders
+
Mobilization of Higher Education Learning On Demand In Your Hand
+ Impact of Mobilization in Higher Education
+Poll # 1
What is your primary mobile device?
Androids
Tablets
Smart Phones
Apple
( ) Apple iPod( ) Apple iPad( ) Apple iPhone( ) Android Phone( ) Android Tablet( ) Blackberry Phone( ) Blackberry Playbook( ) other
+Poll # 2
Has your school established a strategic plan for incorporating mobile devices and apps?
Androids
Tablets
SmartPhones
Apple
( ) YES( ) In Progress( ) Unsure( ) No
+
Faculty and Students Use of Mobile Devices for EnhancingLearning and Teaching
A Pilot Study at ETSU
Sponsored by Academics Affairs TBReLearning
Presented by Carolyn NovakEmerging Technology CenterEast Tennessee State University
+
The purpose of this survey was to determine attitudes towards, and feasibility of, students/educators using mobile devices and educational applications (apps) to enhance their learning/teaching.
+Student (learning) Survey Statistics
Conducted April 4, 2011 – May 7, 2011
Link made available via E-mail Facebook Twitter Goldlink Portal page Calendar announcement on ETSU web site Home page ETSU web site 1 on 1 interviews (ETC staff)
995 respondents
Incentive prize – iPod Touch
+Faculty (teaching) Survey Statistics
Conducted April 14, 2011 – May 31, 2011
Link made available via e-mail to all full-time faculty
277 respondents
Incentive prize - iPad
Android smart phone
iPod Touch iPhone Blackberry smart phone
iPad Windows mobile phone
PDA Android or other tablet
28%
23%
15%14%
8%
4%3% 3%
15%18%
21%
18%
14%
2%
10%
1%
Mobile Devices Ownedstudent, faculty
Android smart phone
iPod Touch iPhone Blackberry smart phone
iPad Windows mobile phone
PDA Android or other tablet
31%
18% 18%
13%11%
3%2% 3%
13% 13%
27%
13%
23%
1%
7%
3%
Mobile Devices Used For Classworkstudent, faculty
Too expensiv
e
Not needed fo
r classw
ork
Do not want t
o use a m
obile device
No time to le
arn how to
operate
Apps not a
ligned w
ith th
e textb
ook/curri
culum
Do not see benefits
for educa
tion
54%
18%
6%2% 6% 6%
74%
15%9% 10% 9%
6%
Reasons For Not Owning a Mobile Devicestudents, faculty
Not aware Vaguely aware Aware
24%
41%
35%
24%
47%
29%
Response That Best Describes Your Awareness of Mobile Educational Apps
students, faculty
Never Occasionally Often
59%
28%
13%
67%
26%
7%
Response That Best Describes How Often You Use Educational Apps
students, faculty
I will not use them I am somewhat likely to use them
I will continue to use them
I am likely to use them
7%
22%
33%38%
7%
20%26%
47%
As Educational Apps Mature, What Best Describes Your Useage
students, faculty
+How Students Use Mobile Devices for Class Work
Checking email
Internet searches & research
Checking D2L
Checking grades
One Two Three Four Five or More
26%
33%
19%
10% 12%
25%
31%
23%
5%
17%
How Many Educational Apps Do You Use?student, faculty
+Use of Education App Types - student
1. Dictionary
2. Email
3. D2L
4. Calculator
5. Study Aids/Reference
6. Note-taking
+Use of Education App Types - faculty
1. Clinical Apps (Medical)
2. Music
3. Study Aids
4. Teaching Resources
5. Interactive Classroom Tools
No, I am not aware and not interested in re-
ceiving more informa-tion at this time
No, I am not aware of that App but would like
more information
Yes, but I do not use that app as a resource
for my classes
Yes, and I use that app as a resource in my
classes
21%
71%
5% 3%
12%
79%
7% 2%
Are You Aware of the Free Mobile App Access My College Library
students, faculty
I am not allowed to use mobile devices in any of my classes. I am allowed to use mobile
devices in some of my classes. I am allowed to use mobile devices in all of my classes.
38%
48%
13%
Classroom Use of Mobile Devices - students
YesNo
57%
43%
Allow Students to Use Mobile Devices in Classroom - faculty
+ Reasons that Mobile Devices Are Not Allowed
Student Classroom distraction
Promotes cheating
Faculty Classroom distraction
Promotes cheating
Technological/financial disadvantage for some students
YesNo
74%
26%
Willing to Receive More Information on the Use of Mobile Devices - students
YesNo
91%
9%
Willing to Attend Training on Mobile Devices and Apps - faculty
Library Courses Calendar Campus directory
Maps (with GPS)
News Emergency contacts
On campus menus
iTunes U Images Athletics Videos
85% 84% 83%
77%
67% 67%63%
47%44%
35% 33%31%
What Free ETSU Mobile App Services Would be Beneficial - students
Library Campus directory
Calendar Courses Maps (with GPS)
Emergency contacts
News iTunes U Videos Images On campus menus
Athletics
87%
73%71%
65% 63%
57%
50%45%
34% 33%
27%22%
What Free ETSU Mobile App Services Would be Beneficial - faculty
+
Possible benefits in adopting mobile technology to enhance the learning experience (Likert scale responses)
Not Applicable Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
3%1% 3%
29%
65%
4% 6%
17%
39%34%
Anytime, Anywhere Learningstudent, faculty
Not Applicable Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
3% 2% 5%
39%
52%
3% 3%7%
46%41%
Individualized Learningstudent, faculty
Not Applicable Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
3% 1% 3%
30%
63%
3% 2% 3%
36%
55%
Easy to Access Course Content and Assignments
student, faculty
Not Applicable Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
3% 2% 3%
31%
62%
3% 3% 4%
38%
52%
Easy to Provide Updates to Content and Assignments
student, faculty
Not Applicable Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
5%2%
10%
42%41%
11%
6%
17%
39%
27%
Learning Speedstudent, faculty
Not Applicable Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
3% 1% 1%
31%
64%
3%2% 2%
41%
52%
Easy to Provide Alertsstudent, faculty
Not Applicable Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
4%2%
6%
41%
47%
3%2%
9%
48%
37%
Ability to Form Learning Networks with People of Similar Interests and Needs
student, faculty
Not Applicable Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
3% 2% 4%
52%
40%
3% 3% 6%
46%42%
Easy Access to Tutorials and Supple-mentary Resources
student, faculty
+Possible barriers in adopting mobile technology to enhance the learning experience (Likert scale responses)
Not Applicable Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
6% 7%
22%
35%
29%
4% 6%
17%
39%
34%
Too Expensivestudent, faculty
Not Applicable Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
8%
17%
48%
21%
6%
10%16%
51%
17%
5%
Not Fast Enoughstudent, faculty
Not Applicable Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
5%9%
29%
39%
18%
5% 4%
22%
48%
21%
Small Screen Sizestudent, faculty
Not Applicable Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
5%
32% 33%
23%
7%2%
10%
26%
40%
22%
Lack of Familiarity (on how to use mobile technologies or services)
student, faculty
Not Applicable Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
6%
36%
44%
11%
3%
7%
18%
57%
15%
3%
Too Difficult To Usestudent, faculty
Not Applicable Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
13%10%
28%
38%
11%
19%
8%
40%
26%
6%
Lack of Educational Appsstudent, faculty
Not Applicable Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
6%
11%
25%
38%
20%
8%7%
38%
34%
13%
Battery Lifestudent, faculty
Not Applicable Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
9%
14%
34%
30%
13%11%
6%
26%30%
27%
Difficult To Monitor/Control Cheatingstudent, faculty
Not Applicable Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
4%
18%
35%
27%
15%9%
6%
28%
35%
22%
Creates Classroom Distractionstudent, faculty
Not Applicable Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
27%
5%
10%
35%
24%
My Professor Has Not Been Trained to Use it as a Teaching Tool - student
Not Applicable Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
11%
5%
11%
40%
33%
I Have Not Been Trained to Use it as a Teaching Tool - faculty
+Student Thoughts on Using Mobile Technology to Enhance Learning
Positive Re-
sponse74%
Negative Response8%
Neutral/Mixed Re-
sponse17%
+Faculty Thoughts on Using Mobile Technology to Enhance Learning
Positive Re-
sponse58%
Negative Response10%Neutral/Mixed Response31%
+Closing Remarks
It’s here and it’s staying
More information & education is needed, and wanted
Too expensive
More cross-platform Apps are needed
There is enthusiasm but there are concerns
Cheating and classroom distraction need to be addressed
+
Thank you!
+ Mobilized Community College
Walters State Community College (mWSCC)
www.ws.edu
Students
Tablets
SmartPhones
Faculty
•
Academic and Departmental Mobilization Plans
+• mNatural Sciences
• mPlanHumanities
• mPlanMathematic
• mPlanBehavioral and Social Sciences
• mPlanHealth Education
• mPlanTechnical Education
• mPlanBusiness Technology
• mPlanParalegal Studies
• mPlanPublic Safety Division
• mPlanStudent Success
• mPlanCulinary Arts
• mPlans- Chef Plan l / Chef Plan ll / Chef Plan lll
• WSCC Off-Campus Mobilization Plans: mGreeneville / mSevier Campuses
WSCC Departmental Mobilization Evolving Plans
+Tennessee Board of Regents eLearning Mobilization Strategic Plan:Quality Assessment Mobile Product Sample
System wide Sample / Purchase
ADA Compliance TBR IT
[security/networking] IMS Global Common Cartr
idge Standards Cost & Resources
Mobilization Examination 30 Days Campus Evaluations Faculty & Staff Testers Pilot Studies Surveys & Observations Curriculum /Program
Alignment Student Outcomes
Mobilization Outcomes Program Alignment Student Outcomes Educational Pricing System Wide Purchase Annual Evaluations
Mobilization Demonstration Vendor Showcase Product Demonstration Faculty & Student Usability Vendor Use References Vendor IT & IMS Demos
+Poll # 3
Has your school established procedures for identifying educational apps for faculty and students?
Androids
Tablets
SmartPhones
Apple
( ) YES( ) In Progress( ) Unsure( ) No
+
Prices of Mobile Apps
+
TBReLearning Mobile App Quality Standards for Education and Workforce Development
+Sloan-C Five Pillars of eLearning/Online
APP Excellence:
+The SLOAN-C 5 PillarsSLOAN-C QUALITY APP FRAMEWORK
1. LEARNING EFFECTIVENESS
2. SCALE (COST EFFECTIVENESS AND COMMITMENT)
3. ACCESS
4. FACULTY SATISFACTION
5. STUDENT SATISFACTION
+ It complies with ADA Standards
It can be accessed from all mobile devices (Apple, Androids, Netbooks, etc.)
It is aligned with the curriculum
It can be measured in terms of students’ outcomes
It allows the instructor to monitor and track students’ progress
It provides at least two (2) learning options (visual, audio, etc.)
+ It meets instructional design best practices
It adheres to Human Subject Review requirements
It meets federal, state, and local mandates
It respects the privacy of others
It meets the PG rating standards
It can be modified to meet the needs of student learning styles.
It can be used without the Internet.
+Tennessee Board of Regents eLearning Mobilization Strategic Plan
Mobile Product: Apps System wide Sample
Purchase ADA Compliance App Quality Standards
Mobilization Examination MERLOT Peer Reviewers Faculty & Staff Testers Pilot Studies Surveys & Observations Curriculum /Program Alignment Student Outcomes
Mobilization Outcomes Apple App Volume Pricing Annual App Evaluations Technology Prediction &
Changes
Mobilization Demonstration Podcasting / YouTube viewing Hands-On Demo/Curriculum
Team
+TBReLearning Mobilization Support to Campuses Campus Mobilization Strategic Planning
Campus Mobilization Phase I
Presentations Research & Data Regarding the
Impact of Mobilization Alignment of Mobilization with
Campus Strategic Olan Mobilization Quality Standards Strategic Planning for Mobilization Business Models for Mobilization Accreditation and Student
Outcomes Faculty Development Showcase of Mobile Devices TBR Purchases & Contracts Mobile App Resource Center Apple App Volume Purchase
Program
Campus Mobilization Phase II
Examination 30 Day on-site Assessment of
Devices Updates for Strategic Plans Alignment with QEP Pilots Campus Surveys Curriculum & Program Alignment
of Mobile Apps Faculty Training Funding of Specialized
Mobilization Consultants and/or Conferences / Training
Campus Conference / Summit
+ www.MERLOT.org
Peer Review Process for Mobile Apps
Peer Review Rating System
Reviewers’ Comments
Personal App Collection
Teaching & Learning Exercises with Apps
Expertise in field
Excellence in teaching
Experience in using technology in teaching and learning,
Connections to professional organizations in their discipline.
+
www.TBReLearning.org
*Biology College App
+
Emantras’ Frog Dissection iPad App (√ Model App)*Cross Platform App / Assessment / Sample Lesson Plans
Frog Dissection: Frog Dissection from Punflay, is a greener alternative for teaching dissection in the classroom. Students can try dissecting a virtual specimen with all the trappings that come with the real procedure-minus the mess of course! Besides a virtual chloroformed specimen, the app comes with all the dissection tools and detailed instructions to complete the procedure. Once dissection is complete, the frog’s organs are exposed for further study. Vivid 3D images will help students visualize the internal organs very effectively. For enhanced learning experience, the app also has information on the different types of frogs, frogs’ life cycle, anatomical comparison of frogs with humans, an interactive quiz and detailed descriptions of the organs. *Further information regarding the cost, feedback, and how to download:http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/frog-dissection/id377626675?mt=8#
+Tennessee Board of Regents eLearning Mobilization Strategic Plan
Mobile Product: Apps System wide Sample Purchase
Apple App Volume Purchase ADA Compliance App Quality Standards
Mobilization Examination Faculty & Staff Testers Pilot Studies Surveys & Observations Curriculum /Program
Alignment Student Outcomes
Mobilization Outcomes Apple App Volume Pricing Annual App Evaluations Technology Prediction &
Changes
Mobilization Demonstration Podcasting / YouTube viewing Hands-On Demo/Curriculum
Team
+
TBR System Wide Scalability of Apps
through Apple App Volume Purchase Program
Frog Dissection App
TBReLearimgMobilizationAwareness
Presentation
Campus Mobilization Planning & Purchasing
Mobilization Training
Out-of-State
Campus
TBReLearn
Evaluation
Pilots Equipment 30 Day Loan for ReviewConsultation
+Quality Standards and Scalability of Mobilization for Higher Education
Tennessee Board of Regents
mTBR
Robbie K. MeltonAssociate Vice ChancellorTennessee Board of Regents eLearning
www.TBReLearning.org
Apps
Tablets
SmartPhones
eReaders