hiroshima: the world's bombby andrew j. rotter;atomic tragedy: henry l. stimson and the...
TRANSCRIPT
Hiroshima: The World's Bomb by ANDREW J. ROTTER; Atomic Tragedy: Henry L. Stimsonand the Decision to Use the Bomb Against Japan by SEAN L. MALLOY; The Nuclear Taboo: TheUnited States and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons Since 1945 by NINA TANNENWALDReview by: LAWRENCE D. FREEDMANForeign Affairs, Vol. 87, No. 6 (November/December 2008), pp. 161-162Published by: Council on Foreign RelationsStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20699391 .
Accessed: 10/06/2014 10:11
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
Council on Foreign Relations is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to ForeignAffairs.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 91.229.229.252 on Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:11:17 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Recent Booh
Arabia and Switzerland. Altogether, this volume is a handy and interesting source of information. Meanwhile, intracountry mi
gration, about which information is harder
to get, is undoubtedly much higher than
intercountry migration; migration within China alone probably matches the global total for migration between countries.
quaint. Today s higher oil prices make the expansion of oil- and gas-production
capacity financially easier but also post pone the long-term need for finding new sources of revenue. This is an informative
analysis of these important organizations and their evolving relationships with their
government owners.
Oil Titans: National Oil Companies in the Middle East, by valerie marcel.
Brookings Institution Press, 2006,
322 pp. $52.95 (paper, $22.95). Oil and gas production was nationalized
by many governments in opec (the Organ ization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) in the 1970s. In the subsequent three decades, the resulting national oil
companies (nocs) matured professionally; moved downstream into refining, distri
bution, and sometimes petrochemical
production; and became more commercial
in orientation. But despite their importance in world oil production, they remain little studied. Based in part on over 100 inter
views, this book attempts to correct that
for five nocs: those of Abu Dhabi, Algeria, Iran, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia. Nocs
have not hitherto been notable for their
openness, but they are reevaluating their
approaches to it, as well as to the two very different worlds in which they must simul
taneously operate: an international business
environment, still dominated by a hand
ful of Western-based international oil
companies, and a domestic political environment, often governed by fierce
nationalist sentiments and heavily depen dent on the revenues provided by the nocs. The interviews for the book took place in 2004, and the analysis goes only through 2005: the oil price of $35 a barrel, which is the price used in the book, now looks
Military, Scientific, and Technological
LAWRENCE D. FREEDMAN
Hiroshima: The World's Bomb, by Andrew
j. rotter. Oxford University Press,
2008,384 pp. $29.95. Atomic Tragedy: Henry L. Stimson and the
Decision to Use the Bomb Against Japan. by sean l. Malloy. Cornell
University Press, 2008, 248 pp. $26.95. The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and
the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons Since
1945. by nina tannenwald.
Cambridge University Press, 2008, 472 pp. $85.00 (paper, $34.99).
The literature on the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki continues to grow. It moved some time ago beyond both the orthodox insistence that using the bomb was the necessary means to conclude a
brutal war and the revisionist claim that the true aim was to gain advantage in the
coming confrontation with the Soviet Union. In practice, given the availability of the weapon, the state of the war, and
the growing tension in relations with
Moscow, the default position favored the bombs use. The tougher call would have been to argue for restraint.
Rotter provides a readable account of the
political and scientific contexts in which
FOREIGN AFFAIRS - November/December 2008 [ 161 ]
This content downloaded from 91.229.229.252 on Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:11:17 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Recent Booh
the bomb was developed and used and of some of the aftermath. He seeks originality by stressing the international cast of char
acters implicated in the bomb s develop ment and the countries that subsequently built their own?so that Hiroshimas bomb becomes the worlds bomb. As a unifying theme, this is a bit contrived. Malloy
manages more originality. He approaches the decision to use the bomb from the
perspective of a key player, Secretary of War Henry Stimson, who had a record of opposition to indiscriminate attacks
on civilians, evident misgivings about the
prospective use of the atomic bomb, and
concern about the implications of its use
for future peace and security. When the
time came for a determination, Stimson was
78, tired and unwell, and faced with many urgent decisions. Opinions and assump tions were fluid about the reliability of the bomb and its likely effects on the Japanese leadership, the possibility of a conditional
Japanese surrender, the costs and dangers of an invasion, and the potential impact of the bombs use on wider international
relations. Stimson was unhappy with the
resulting decision, but Malloy claims that he contributed to a "brutal and tragic act"
by failing to pay attention to the details of the targeting, not doing enough to push the diplomatic track, and not insisting on keeping to the fore the potential long term consequences.
Malloy also quotes an April 1945 memo from Stimson to President Harry Truman
warning of the possibility of these weapons' eventually being constructed in secret and
used for surprise attacks. Malloy describes
this memo as prescient, which normally means having accurate knowledge of future
events. But in fact, the most striking thing about nuclear weapons since 1945 is that
they have not been used. Tannenwald
has done more than most to develop the
concept and describe the workings of the "nuclear taboo," which has led to what
previous generations might have considered
to be an unnatural restraint demonstrated
by successive generations of political leaders. She notes that the bombing of
Hiroshima, with its demonstration effect
and Asian victims, was a factor inhibiting the bombs use in the Korean War and the
Vietnam War. Her book demonstrates
how through these wars and on to the 1991 Persian Gulf War, the taboo took root and was institutionalized in U.S. policy. But as Tannenwald warns, this taboo does
not constitute a full delegitimization of nuclear weapons, and whether the inhi
bition would continue to work in, say, Israel or Pakistan in the face of an exis
tential threat is a much trickier question.
Targeting Civilians in War. by
Alexander ?. downes. Cornell
University Press, 2008,328 pp. $29.95. Those who would rely on norms as a source
of restraint in war even in the face of the
developing frustration of wartime leaders
desperate for a way out would do well to read Downed Targeting Civilians in War. There is nothing new about abhorrence of the idea of victimizing civilians, yet as the
strategic incentives pile up, restraints have
generally turned out to be depressingly fragile. Like most contemporary American
political scientists, Downes is obliged to
explore whether certain categories of states,
notably democracies, do better at maintain
ing restraint, but in the end, explanations based on strategic logic hold up better than those focused on regime type. If anything,
when things get tough, democracies are less restrained than other states.
[162] FOREIGN AFFAIRS Volume 87 No. 6
This content downloaded from 91.229.229.252 on Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:11:17 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions