historical development of political economy in southern cone and larger latin american states

25
Historical Historical Development of Development of Political Economy Political Economy in Southern Cone in Southern Cone and larger Latin and larger Latin American States American States

Upload: sherman-lamb

Post on 11-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

Historical Historical Development of Development of

Political Economy in Political Economy in Southern Cone and Southern Cone and

larger Latin larger Latin American StatesAmerican States

Page 2: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

PoliticsPolitics is about creatingcreating

alliancesalliances and maintaining goodmaintaining good

relations with key constituentsrelations with key constituents

in order to stay in power and accomplish political objectives.

As issues and context change,

alliances may break downalliances may break down, and

new allies have to be sought out. Likely result is a shift in policy stance.

Page 3: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

Eco and Pol Development, Periphery

I, 1880-1930sEco Strategy: Export-led growth

Target Market: Western Europe, United States

Needs: 1. Transport and communication networks2. Labor

How to meet needs? Alliance between local elites and foreign capitalists

Page 4: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

Export-led Growth: Economic Side

Economic ProcessEconomic Process

Raw materials exported to

industrialized states; manuf. goods imported from

industr. states to L.A

 

Page 5: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

Export-led Growth: The Political Side

Political Arrangement:

“Oligarchic Democracy”

Political Representation: Limited to rural and urban upper classes

Page 6: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

Political Challenges to Export Political Challenges to Export Strategy and Oligarchic Strategy and Oligarchic

Democracy, 1910sDemocracy, 1910s• Rise of new classes • Loss of communal

lands by indig. groups (Mexico, Peru)

• Emergence of new parties to represent new classes

Page 7: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

Economic Challenges to Export Strategy and

Oligarchic Democracy, 1930s•Great Depression

brought sense of betrayal towards modernizing elites and foreigners

•Rural-Urban Migration

Page 8: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

Eco and Pol Development in Periphery I, 1940s-1960s

Eco Strategy: Import Substitution Industrialization --ISI is a development strategy in which the State turns inward and attempts to develop from within, placing emphasis on production for the domestic market

Target Market: All Domestic Urban Classes (numbers matter)

How to meet needs? Alliance between govt and urban capitalists, military, and urban workers

Page 9: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

ISI: The Economic SideInvestment capital tends to be domestic

– either private or public (state

development banks)

Ownership: Domestic private ownership and State-owned industries

Page 10: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

ISI: The Political SidePopulism: charismatic form of rule that offers great

hope to broad sectors of society; patriotic and nationalistic, but also inclusive and sympathetic to plight of poor

Populist Alliance: entrepreneurs, organized labor, and modernizing military officers

Page 11: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

Political Representation Political Representation Under Populism, 1940s-Under Populism, 1940s-

1950s1950s

Page 12: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

Characteristics of 1940s-50s Populism

Ideology:nationalistic, anti-imperialistic, anti-communist, incorporating, supported state intervention in economy

Leadership: dynamic, charismatic, use of mass rally, charity, “benevolent dictators”

Promise of Growth + Development

Page 13: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

Crisis of ISI as an Economic Crisis of ISI as an Economic StrategyStrategy

Exhaustion of ISI in late-1950s and early-1960s. Why?1. Return of foreign competition2. Inability to compete abroad3. Industrial growth too dependent on imports of capital goods, resulting in b of p deficit and debt4. Decline in traditional export earnings

Page 14: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

Collapse of Populist AllianceWhen economy went downhill, coalition began to unravel. Why?

1. Organized labor bargains with state to lock in wage increases

2. Manufacturers demand continued subsidies, protection from competition

3. Wage-push inflation -- too many dollars chasing too few goods pushes inflation into triple digits

Govt must choose between Growth and Development

Page 15: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

The Choice: The Choice: Growth vs. Development, Growth vs. Development, Dictatorship vs. Electoral Dictatorship vs. Electoral

Socialism Socialism

Page 16: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

The Answer: Bureaucratic-Authoritarian Rule

In late-1960s and 1970s, all Southern

Cone and larger L.Am. countries

eventually experienced some form of B-

A rule and attempts to “deepen”

industrialization through dependent

development

Page 17: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

Dependent Development, 1960s -70s

Eco. Strategy: “Deepening” of Industrialization --manufacture of durable and capital goods

Target Market: Urban upper classes and foreign markets

Needs: Capital; labor-saving technology

Page 18: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

Dependent Dependent Development: Development:

The Economic SideThe Economic SideTech and Firm Size: capital intensive, efficient

and competitive; large plants

Investment: Foreign investment through joint ventures with multi-national corporations (MNCs)How? 1. Create stable investment climate

2. Place economy in hands of técnicos

Page 19: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

Role of State in Dependent Development

State-led growth•Cut resources for poor

•Increase state spending on technology and investment in business

Theory:Theory: put $ in hands of those who can purchase durable consumer goods

Ex. – Brazil, Argentina

Neo-liberal free-market-led growth

•Cuts in social spending•Lower tariffs and cut subsidies to businesses

•Privatization of state-owned industry

Theory:Theory: Rationalize the economy and eliminate inefficient firms

Ex. – Chile

Page 20: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

Dependent Development: The Political Side (B-A Rule)

Bureaucratic-Authoritarian regimes are “excluding,” non-democratic forms of political rule in which military officers and technocrats work in close association with foreign capital to advance industrialization

--elimination of electoral competition

--elimination of democratic institutions--human rights abuses/repression

Page 21: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

Examples of B-A RuleBrazil – 1964-86; succession of Presidents

from armed forcesChile – 1973-90; Augusto PinochetArgentina – 1966-73, 1976-83; succession of juntas

Uruguay – 1973-84; civilian presidents with military administrators

Peru – 1968-80; established “Revolutionary Government of the Armed Forces”

Mexico – 1960s (when govt turns more repressive) – 2000; questionable B-A rule (one-party dominant rule, dictablanda)

Page 22: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

Economic Challenges to B-A Rule, 1980s

1. International Recession2. Foreign Debt (b/c of large capital

outlays by State at high interest rates and economic recession)

3. Rise in economic deprivation--unemployment and underemployment--widespread poverty--shortage of housing and social services

Page 23: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

Political Challenges to B-A Regimes

1. Mass social movements

2. International condemnation of political repression

3. Collapse of economy reduces incentives to stay in power

Page 24: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

Political Economy of Periphery I, post-B-A RuleEco Strategy: Economic liberalization and market integration w/ stronger welfare state

Target Market: Urban domestic, foreign

Investment: Foreign and domestic (predominantly from MNCs)

Based on liberal economic theory -- global integration creates jobs, makes industry more productive and consumer goods available at

cheaper prices

Page 25: Historical Development of Political Economy in Southern Cone and larger Latin American States

Politics of “New Democracies”

Characteristics

--Limited, procedural democracy

--During economic hard times or

political crises, temptation to

revert to non-constitutional

practices

--Although some countries have

made strides at strengthening

judicial system, others still

have corrupt, weak law

enforcement and legal system