history - stonehenge - how they rebuilt stonehenge - and didn't tell
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 History - Stonehenge - How They Rebuilt Stonehenge - And Didn't Tell
1/7
How They Rebuilt Stonehenge
Monday, 1 July 2013
UFO Aliens UK
For decades the official Stonehenge guidebooks have been full ofascinating facts and figures and theories surrounding the world's greatest
rehistoric monument.
What the glossy brochures do not mention, however, is the systematic
ebuilding of the 4,000 year old stone circle throughout the 20th Century.
The restoration has been kept elusive and a large percentage of those
lanning a trip to the monument have no idea that they aren't getting the
ull story."
Right: 17th Century depiction of Stonehenge.Image credit: Wikipedia
-
7/29/2019 History - Stonehenge - How They Rebuilt Stonehenge - And Didn't Tell
2/7
Post-WW1 aerial photograph before 1960s reconstruction.Image credit: Wikipedia
This is one of the dark secrets of history archaeologists don't talk about: The day they had the builders in
tonehenge to recreate the most famous ancient monument in Britain as they thought it ought to look.
This picture shows workers on the site in 1901 in a restoration which caused outrage at the time but wh
rarely referred to in official guidebooks. For it means that Stonehenge, jewel in the crown of Britain
heritage industry, is not all it seems. Much of what the ancient site's millions of visitors see in fact dates
less than 50 years.
rom 1901 to 1964, the majority of the stone circle was restored in a series of makeovers which have le
n the words of one archaeologist, as 'a product of the 20th century heritage industry'. But the informatiomarkedly absent from the guidebooks and info-phones used by tourists at the site Coming in the wake o
-
7/29/2019 History - Stonehenge - How They Rebuilt Stonehenge - And Didn't Tell
3/7
tonehenge has caused embarrassment among archaeologists. English Heritage, the guardian of the
monument, is to rewrite the official guide, which dismisses the Henge's recent history in a few words. D
Batchelor, English Heritage's senior archaeologist said he would personally rewrite the official guide. 'T
etail was dropped in the Sixties', he admitted. 'But times have changed and we now believe this is an
mportant piece of the Stonehenge story and must be told'.
Cambridge University archaeological archivist and leading Stonehenge author Christopher Chippindale
dmitted: 'Not much of what we see at Stonehenge hasn't been touched in some way'. And historical res
tudent Brian Edwards, who recently revealed that the nearby Avebury Monument had been totally rebu
as found rare pictures of Stonehenge being restored. He said: 'It has been as if Stonehenge had been
istorically cleansed'. 'For too long people have been kept in the dark over the Stonehenge restoration w
m astonished by how few people know about it. It is wonderful the guide book is going to tell the full s
n the future.'
Image from the 1954 reconstruction
-
7/29/2019 History - Stonehenge - How They Rebuilt Stonehenge - And Didn't Tell
4/7
Image from the 1954 reconstruction
A million visitors a year are awe-struck as they look back in time into another age and marvel at the prim
echnology and muscle-power which must have been employed transporting the huge monoliths and raishem on Salisbury Plain. They gasp as they are told about this strangely spiritual site.... mankind's first
omputer, its standing stones and precise lintels, lining up magically and mysteriously with the heavens
bove and the solstice suns.
-
7/29/2019 History - Stonehenge - How They Rebuilt Stonehenge - And Didn't Tell
5/7
An early photograph of Stonehenge taken July 1877.Image credit: Wikipedia
But now, as if to head off a potential great archaeological controversy - and following interest displayed
istorical researcher Brian Edwards and a local newspaper, the brochures will be re-written, to include th
forgotten years'. The years when teams of navvies sat aboard the greatest cranes in the British Empire to
oist stones upright; drag leaning trilithons into position, replace fallen lintels which once sat atop the hu
arsens. As Mr Edwards - the erstwhile enfant terrible of British archaeology following revelations that
earby Avebury was a total 20s and 30s rebuild by marmalade millionaire Alexander Keiller - says: 'Wh
ave been looking at is a 20th Century landscape, which is reminiscent of what Stonehenge MIGHT haveen like thousands of years ago. It has been created by the heritage industry and is NOT the creation of
rehistoric people. What we saw at the Millennium is less than 50 years old.'
Image from the 1954 reconstruction
n archaeological terms the re-writing of the guidebooks is dynamite. English Heritage run Stonehenge
ehalf of the nation, and an English Heritage insider revealed: 'Dark forces were at work in the 70s, whe
ecision was taken to drop the information about the restorations Now that is about to change.'
The Restoration and Rebuild
The first restoration of Stonehenge was launched 100 years ago this year.
And, in 1901, as the builders went to work, The Times letters column was full of bucolic missives ofomplaint But the first stage of 'restoration' thundered ahead regardless and the style guru of the day Jo
-
7/29/2019 History - Stonehenge - How They Rebuilt Stonehenge - And Didn't Tell
6/7
tonehenge makeover was to gather momentum and more work was carried out in 1919, 1920, 1958, 19
nd 1964. Christopher Chippindale, curator at the Cambridge University Museum of Archaeology and
Anthropology and Anthropology, and author of Stonehenge Complete, admits: 'Nearly all the stones hav
een moved in some way and are standing in concrete.'
A stone was straightened and set in concrete in 1901, six further stones in 1919 and 1920, three more in
nd four in 1964. There was also the excavation of the Altar stone and re-erection of the Trilithon in 195
Image from the 1954 reconstruction
The guide book 'Stonehenge and Neighbouring Monuments' , and the audio tour of the Henge omit any
omprehensive mention of the rebuilding in the 20th Century. Only on page 18 is there a slight reference
umber of the leaning and fallen stones have been straightened and re-erected.' But even that official gu
ook does not contain clues to the large scale restoration, which was not deemed worth a full entry.
-
7/29/2019 History - Stonehenge - How They Rebuilt Stonehenge - And Didn't Tell
7/7
Why does John Constable's 1835 painting of the Henge on pages 18 and 19 look so vastly different from
atter-day pristine photograph across pages 28 and 29? REASON: A lot of restoration work had taken p
n between the two images being recorded. And, during long hot summers it would be possible - if one c
et near to the stones - to see the turf peeling back to reveal the concrete boots into which the majority o
tones are now set. A dead give-away, but difficult to spot now as proximity to the Henge is limited.
One wonders how an event as massive as the resurrection of a worldly monument such as Stonehenge w
without notice. Today, it is rare to stumble upon any mention of the reconstruction of the historic monum
eople like having clear guidelines that are followed, like those at an online casino where there is no roo
misunderstandings. If the reconstruction of Stonehenge was made clear to the public it would only add t
istorical value.
Image from the 1954 reconstruction
Our pictures clearly show the rebuilding in progress. Some were discovered by Mr Chippendale and we
sed in a revised edition of his book. Many of those have since been lost. Others were found by Mr Edw
who unearthed guide books from the time when Stonehenge was not ashamed of its past and featured
hotographs and stories of the restorations.
The news is sensational,' said Mr Edwards, a decorate student at the University of the West of England.
Once I realised how much work had been carried out, I was amazed to discover that practically no-one
utside of the henge know of its reconstruction in the last 100 years. I have always thought that if peopl
othering to make a trip to Stonehenge, from home or abroad, then the least they should expect is a true
tory.'
art of this article was written by Roger Taverner and originally featured in 'The Western Daily Press'
/1/2001.
ictures appear courtesy of The Wiltshire Archeological Society and Christopher Chippindale.
li i