hls, july 3, 2002. free speech regulate speech

95
<speech> HLS, July 3, 2002

Post on 19-Dec-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

<speech>

HLS, July 3, 2002

<1>

free speech

regulate speech

1st A

“Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech”

1st A

“Congress shall make not many laws … abridging the freedom of

speech, at least without a good reason.”

levels of scrutiny

levels of scrutiny

• content/viewpoint based: strict• content neutral: intermediate• neither: rb

default:heightened review

the gov’t must justify

<2>

Law

Market

Architecture

Norm

s

Law

Market

Architecture

Norm

s

Mill, On Liberty

Law

Market

Architecture

Norm

s

<3>

<histories>

inversions

technological inversions

(1)

“persons, houses, papers, and effects, against

unreasonable searches and seizures”

public

private

private

public

(2)

“Congress has the power … to regulate commerce

… among the several states”

inter

intra

intra

inter

first response: blinders

ultimate response: rebalance

</histories>

<argument I: less is more>

©

©

©circa1790

“map, chart, book or books”

“printing, reprinting, publishing and vending”

“fourteen years”

x2, if author lives

“if registered”

“if deposited”

13,000

<1,000

127

unregulated

freedom

to disnifyto counter-tell

to tinker

freedomto…

QuickTime™ and aSorenson Video 3 decompressorare needed to see this picture.

©circanow

(1)changing law

from“map, chart, book or

books”

to any creative work“reduced to a tangible

form”

from “printing, reprinting,

publishing and vending”

toany “copy”

from “fourteen years”

maybe x2

to “forever minus a day”

“whether or not registered”

“without deposit”

(2)changing technology

book

eBook

changing law+

changing code

regulatedcreativity

inversion

free

regulated

regulated

free

</argument I>

<argument II: more is less>

“gov’t is our friend”

ACLU: “censorship”

spam

stage 1: abuse

stage 2: response public?

ACLU: “censorship”

stage 3: response private

rbl

if you don’t live by our email policies,

your email will be dropped into a black hole

MIT v. HP

gilmore

stage 4: response public

spam law

1. If you send UCE, you must tag it.2. If you violate (1), then the first 5

people to track you down get $25,000.

regulation increases freedom