home [] files/nasc... · web viewc/kc-130t np2000 propeller maintenance training device that allows...
TRANSCRIPT
RWP Number
White Papers Due Date/Time
Submit White Papers To
Please advise CMG as soon as possible via email to [email protected] if your organization intends to submit a White Paper to CMG in response to this RWP.
Statement of Need
Title of Requirement: U.S. Navy C/KC-130T NP2000 Propeller Training System
RWP Number: N2517-19-065
Estimated Delivery Date of Prototype: August 2020
Security Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Problem Statement:
The C-130 has been operating as a Joint Service aircraft for the Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force for more than 40 years. As a part of a series of modernization upgrades, the Navy’s C/KC-130T aircraft are being modified with the NP2000 propeller system, replacing the current propeller system. The Navy conducts its formal aircrew and maintenance C-130 Training at the Air Logistics Training Center (ALTC), Joint Reserve Base, Fort Worth, Texas. ALTC utilizes motion and non-motion simulators to support the aircrew training curriculum and a small number of aging aircraft systems training devices to support the maintenance training curriculum. Students that successfully complete their training at ALTC will receive follow-on assignment to one of five operational Navy C/KC-130T squadrons. The Navy also operates the NP2000 propeller system on its fleet of C-2 Greyhound and E-2 Hawkeye aircraft, but there is no formal C/KC-130T NP2000 maintenance training pipeline.
PMA 207, the Navy’s C/KC-130 Program Office, is seeking an NP2000 prototype training simulator solution that will include NP2000 hardware to provide system theory of operation and maintenance task proficiency for squadron aircrew and maintenance personnel. This training solution shall include aircrew and maintenance operational checks, tasks, fault isolation, maintenance and corrective action procedures identified in the Navy’s C/KC-130T Flight and Maintenance Manuals. It will include maintenance operational checks for the NP2000 system and address the T-56 Engine’s role in power and propulsion of the C/KC-130T. The NP2000 prototype training solution shall simulate the fit and function of the NP2000 modified C/KC-130T to fully depict maintenance and operation within a controlled training environment. The solution will be evaluated to determine the effectiveness of training aircrew and maintenance personnel without a tactical aircraft.
Desired Objective:
The C/KC-130T NP2000 prototype training solution shall be the primary method used by instructors and students to become proficient in operating and maintaining the NP2000-modified C/KC-130T. The NP2000 prototype training solution shall include a prototype hands-on NP2000 Propeller Maintenance Trainer, Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Maintenance Training (VMT). The NP2000 prototype Propeller Maintenance Trainer shall use the Government Furnished Equipment listed below or simulate that equipment to provide the same operation and tactile response required for training. The introduction of this new capability will require additional digital training media as part of the prototype C/KC-130T NP2000 training solution. Following instruction utilizing the digital training media, the students will require hands-on training utilizing a training device representative of the actual C/KC-130T aircraft engine and NP2000 propeller. The NP2000 Propeller maintenance training device may be permanently located on the hangar deck at ALTC.
The Government will make the following equipment and information available for use in the prototype solution.
- One T-56 Engine (non-Electronic Propeller Control System modified)
- NP2000 Propeller Hub, Part Number (P/N) 1006581-2
- NP2000 Propeller Adaptor, P/N 820612-2
- C-130T NP2000 Navy Maintenance Manuals
- C-130T NP2000 Navy Flight Manual (NATOPS)
- Airframes Change (AFC) Number 494
- Drawing (96916) 14A3243, AFC-494 Installation Data Instructions
The Government will make the following equipment available for use in the prototype solution on or about July 2020. Technical data on these items can be provided earlier than July 2020, as needed.
1. NP2000 Actuator Valve Module, P/N 1006712-2
2. NP2000 Spinner, P/N 825818-2
3. NP200 Aft Spinner, P/N 825869-2
4. NP2000 Pitch Change Actuator, P/N 826615-3
The Government is attempting to make available a minimum of one and a maximum of eight NP2000 Propeller blades for use in the prototype solution. For the purpose of White Paper submissions, the offeror should plan for the Government to make one NP2000 propeller blade available.
Although not anticipated to be necessary for this prototype project, additional NP2000 Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) data may be available if the offerors enter into a non-disclosure agreement with the NP2000 OEM.
Minimum capability requirements of the Prototype:
1. C/KC-130T NP2000 Propeller Maintenance training device that allows instructor to activate C-130T aircraft, engine and NP2000 related faults that would result in a simulated C/KC-130T NP2000 malfunction.
2. C/KC-130T NP2000 Propeller Maintenance training device that allows students, under instructor supervision, to perform fault identification, isolation and maintenance procedures in accordance with (IAW) NAVAIR maintenance publications to return the C/CK-130T NP2000 system to full operation. Maintenance procedures include removal and replacement of the NP2000 Propeller from the T-56 Engine and removal and replacement of individual propeller blades.
3. Digital instruction media that includes AR/VR/VMT technology that enables instructors to train students on:
· C/KC-130T NP2000 System components, theory of operation, limitations, servicing, safety precautions
· C/KC-130T NP2000 Maintenance procedures identified in NAVAIR maintenance publications
· C/KC-130T NP2000 Aircrew NATOPS procedures
4. Navy C-130T aircrew and maintenance personnel with no previous NP2000 or C-130T experience are able to successfully pass a written NP2000 knowledge test within the allotted time. Testing will occur following Government-led instruction utilizing the prototype NP2000 digital media, associated AR/VR/VMT aids and the Propeller Maintenance Trainer. The success criteria will be developed with the guidance of the Navy School Testing Program Management Manual (NAVEDTRA 132).
5. Navy C-130T maintenance personnel with no previous NP2000 or C-130T experience are able to successfully pass practical knowledge/skills-based task tests. These tests will require the performance of NP2000 Maintenance procedures covered in the Navy’s C-130T NP2000 Maintenance Procedure Manuals and be performed using the NP2000 Propeller Maintenance Trainer. Skills-based task testing will include fault identification, fault isolation, fault repair and return of the NP2000 system to full operation. The success criteria will be developed with the guidance of the Navy School Testing Program Management Manual (NAVEDTRA 132).
6. VMT products that are part of the prototype solution shall have the ability to be loaded and operated on the existing ALTC VMT system. The existing VMT system is comprised of a 3MTM Touch Display running Government-owned software developed with the Unity Gaming Software Engine.
7. Virtual 3D Models of NP2000 components or systems contain a free play mode for students to interact and gain familiarity with the system(s).
8. Digital media in a file format that allows students to upload to a portable handheld device such as an iPhone/iPad/Android device.
9. NP2000 Propeller Maintenance Trainer fits safely within the allocated ALTC Hangar deck space. Allocated Hangar deck space is Length 24ft x Width 24ft x Height 30ft.
10. NP2000 Propeller Maintenance Trainer is designed to facilitate the safe instruction of up to six (6) students simultaneously.
White papers which do not provide the minimum required information will not be evaluated. All white papers which provide the minimum required information and propose a viable technical solution which meets the previously defined capabilities, scope and requirements will be evaluated and will form the pool of responses from which selection will occur. Following selection, the Government will use the solution presented in the white paper as the basis for the development of a detailed Statement of Work (SOW).
*******Only Government personnel will evaluate the White Papers*********
Production: Successful completion of the initial prototype may result in award of follow-on production under provisions of Other Transaction Authority 10 U.S.C. § 2371b(f).
WHITE PAPER INSTRUCTIONS
Overview
An RWP is issued by CMG to solicit White Papers from consortium members that detail their proposed technology solutions to address the challenges outlined in the corresponding Government Statement of Need (SON).
CMG members can submit White Papers individually, or collaborate via a team. CMG will work with each interested member to ensure that government expectations are met and statutory compliance is maintained. Draft White Papers must be submitted to CMG by the member deadline specified in this RWP for review for completeness and compliance. Upon completion of that review, the White Papers will be forwarded to the Government by CMG.
CMG members solely are responsible for all expenses associated with responding to this RWP. White Papers shall conform to the White Paper Template and adhere to the formatting instructions.
Non-traditional Defense Contractor Participation or Cost-Share Commitment
Each Prototype Project awarded under an Other Transaction Agreement (OTA) must meet at least one of the following conditions:
There is at least one Non-traditional Defense Contractor (NDC), small business or nonprofit research institution participating to a significant extent in the Prototype Project, or
At least one-third of the total cost of the Prototype Project is to be paid out of funds provided by parties to the transaction other than the Federal Government.
What is an NDC?
An NDC is an entity that is not currently performing and has not performed, for at least one year preceding the issuance of a prototype project solicitation, any contract or subcontract for the DoD that is subject to full coverage under the FAR-based Cost Accounting Standards (“CAS”). Full CAS coverage is required typically for contracts greater than $50 million. Firm-fixed price contracts and contracts with small businesses are exempt from all CAS requirements regardless of dollar value.
How Does an Entity Determine if it is an NDC?
A review of an entity’s DoD cost-plus contracts and subcontracts on which it has performed during the previous year will aid in determining NDC status. If none of the contracts or subcontracts was subject to full CAS coverage, then the entity is an NDC. OTA awards do not impact NDC status, as CAS does not apply to OTAs.
Are Small Businesses Automatically Considered NDCs?
Yes. Since contracts and subcontracts with small businesses are exempt from all CAS requirements, small businesses are deemed NDCs under OT Authority. An entity is considered a small business based upon its applicable North American Industry Classification System (“NAICS”) designation (as described at 13 C.F.R. §121.201) for the specific nature of the work being proposed.
Are Nonprofit Research Institutions Considered NDCs?
The 2018 NDAA made Nonprofit Research Institutions essentially the same as NDCs with respect to OT Authority.
Can a Subsidiary or a Division of a Corporation Qualify as an NDC?
Yes. Provided the definition of an NDC is met, the entity can be at the prime level, team members, sub-awardees, lower-tier vendors or intra-company business units, including a subsidiary or division of a Traditional Defense Contractor.
Regarding NDC Participation, What does “Significant” Mean?
Significant participation is determined on a project basis and is based on the importance of the NDC contribution to the overall execution or outcome of the proposed project. OT Authority statute does not prescribe a monetary threshold or percentage value to justify significance. Examples of “significant” participation are:
Supplying a new key technology or product, or unique capability;
Causing a material and quantifiable reduction in the project cost or schedule;
Causing a measurable increase in the performance of the prototype;
Accomplishing a significant amount of the effort;
Value-added analysis not based on percentage of project work or value.
How does a Traditional Defense Contractor Satisfy the Cost-sharing Requirement?
If the member responding to an RWP is a Traditional Defense Contractor and there is no significant participation by an NDC in the project, the Traditional Defense Contractor is required to expend resources on the project amounting to one-third of the project cost. Cost-sharing does not involve funds paid directly to the Government. There are two types of cost-sharing:
Cash—outlays of funds to perform under the project for labor, materials, new equipment or subcontractor effort; sources can include new IR&D funds, profit or fee from another contract, and overhead or capital equipment expense pool;
In-Kind—reasonable value of equipment, materials or other property used in performance under the project.
White Paper Format
The White Paper (WP) template is provided as an attachment to this RWP. The following formatting requirements apply:
Times New Roman 10 (or larger), single-spaced, single-sided, 8.5 by 11 inches
Smaller type may be used in figures and tables, but must be clearly legible
Margins on all sides (top, bottom, left and right) should be at least 1 inch
Page limit is ten (10) pages; excluding White Paper Cover Sheet and Affirmation of Business Status Certification(s)
WPs shall include a cover sheet, not counted toward the page limit, that includes:
· Prototype Project Title
· Primary point of contact, secondary point of contact, and FSO, if applicable, including name, address, phone, and e-mail contact information
· Total Solution Rough-Order-of-Magnitude price
Shaded text in the White Paper Template indicates areas for entry of information by the member. Shading should be removed before submittal of the White Paper.
DO NOT SUBMIT ANY CLASSIFIED INFORMATION
Technical Requirements
Background and Benefits of Proposed Solution
Technical Approach, including clearly defined prototype solution
Schedule and Deliverables
Data Rights Assertions: Identify any intellectual property, patents and inventions involved in the proposed solution and associated restrictions on Government use of that intellectual property, patents, and inventions. The following information shall be presented for all assertions:
· Technical data, computer software or patent to be furnished with restriction
· Basis for assertion
· Asserted rights category
If no restrictions are applied, insert “None” in each column.
Data Rights Withholding: Identify any technical data or software involved in the proposed solution that shall NOT be delivered for Government use. The following information shall be presented:
· Technical data and computer software being withheld
· Name of entity owning the technical data and computer software
If no restrictions are applied, state No Withholding.
Cost Section Requirements
The Government will be considering affordability in making its source selection decision; therefore, the White Paper shall contain cost information as requested in the table in Section 6.0 of the White Paper Template.
Evaluation Criteria
The Government will conduct an evaluation of all eligible WPs submitted in response to this RWP based on an integrated assessment of the following:
The degree to which the solution meets the requirements of the SON.
Evaluation of the potential impacts of the data rights assertions.
Evaluation of significant nontraditional or one-third (1/3) cost share, if applicable.
Evaluation of proposed ROM price against government funding profile.
Evaluation of vendor’s experience in developing and fielding similar C-130 training solutions
Basis for Selection
It is the Government’s intention to select, negotiate and fund Prototype Projects from the submitted WP(s). The WP selection will be conducted in accordance with the Government’s procedures and the evaluation criteria identified herein. The Government will make a determination whether to:
Select the WP(s), or some portion of the WP(s), and/or
Retain the WP(s) in a library for potential future requirements in accordance with the terms of the OTA.
The WP selection decision will be provided to CMG, and the Government will issue a Request for Proposal(s) to CMG for the selected WP(s).
Affirmation of Business Status Certification
Each participant proposed in the WP shall complete the Business Status Certification which is provided as an attachment to this RWP.
These certifications shall be included as an attachment to the WP and will not count toward the page limit.
Export Control
Research findings and technology developments arising from the resulting RWP may constitute a significant enhancement to the national defense and to the economic vitality of the United States. As such, in the conduct of all work under the subsequent PPA(s), the recipient will comply strictly with the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (22 CFR 120-130), the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (DoD 5220.22-M) and the Department of Commerce Export Regulation (15 CFR 730-774).
N2517-19-065
Points of Contact
Questions regarding White Paper procedures should be directed to the CMG Contract Management Office, 540-937-6300 or via email to [email protected] .
WHITE PAPER TEMPLATE
RWP Number
Insert RWP Number from Request for White Papers (RWP) cover page
Proposed Project Title
Submittal Date
Submitted By
Consortium Member Point of Contact (POC)*
*Note: POCs shall be from the prime member’s corporation, please do not insert contact information for subcontractor participants.
POC Name
POC Address
POC Phone
POC Email
Less Cost Share
Total (Less Cost Share)
$ Insert amount after cost share deducted, rounded to the nearest dollar
Consortium Fee
$ Insert 3.8% Applied to Total Price per the OTA terms
Total ROM Cost
$ Insert Total Amount
X
SECTION 1.0 Background AND BENEFITS OF PROPOSED SOLUTION
Describe the proposed solution, including how the Government’s requirements shown in the Statement of Need are being addressed. Provide a brief description of the “new” capability that will result.
SECTION 2.0 TECHNICAL approach
Describe the design and detailed technical approach for achieving the proposed prototype solution. Clearly describe the proposed prototype and ensure that it is included as a deliverable in Section 3.0.
SECTION 2.1 PROJECT TASKS
Describe the specific tasks required for project execution. If a phased/element approach is indicated in the Government Statement of Need, the tasks shall be detailed by phase/element.
SECTION 2.2 RISKS
Describe the technical maturity of the proposed solution and its readiness to meet the Government’s requirements. Describe any technical, cost and schedule risks associated with achieving the proposed solution.
SECTION 3.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE AND DELIVERABLES
Milestone
Deliverable
Insert list of milestones
Insert list of deliverables associated with each milestone (at a minimum, the proposed prototype and a final report must be included as deliverables)
Insert estimated lead time in terms of months after award for each milestone/deliverable.
The total proposed project duration is [Insert proposed period of performance in months] months from project award.
SECTION 4.0 PARTICIPANTS
Insert Consortium Member
Insert detailed, quantifiable description which addresses the following:
1. What specific tasks will this Participant be accomplishing for this project?
1. Why are these Participant's tasks significant to this project?*
1. How is this Participant uniquely qualified to provide these tasks for this project?
Insert separate row(s) for each additional participant. Delete row(s) as applicable if Consortium Member is the only participant.
|_| Traditional
|_| Non-traditional
Insert detailed, quantifiable description which addresses the following:
1. What specific tasks will this Participant be accomplishing for this project?
1. Why are these Participant's tasks significant to this project?*
1. How is this Participant uniquely qualified to provide these tasks for this project?
*Significance is defined as supplying a new key technology or product, accomplishing a significant amount of the effort, causing a material reduction in the cost or scheduling or causing an increase in the performance. Any vendor proposing labor costs must be listed as a participant.
SECTION 5.0 DATA RIGHTS
Data Rights Assertions: All intellectual property, patents and inventions involved in the proposed solution and the associated restrictions on the Government’s use of that intellectual property, patents and inventions are presented in the table below. If no assertions are being made, state as such.
Data Rights Withholding: Identify any technical data or software involved in the proposed solution that shall NOT be delivered for Government use are presented in the table below. If none, state No Withholdings.
Technical Data/ Computer Software/ Patent to be Furnished with Restrictions or Withheld
Basis for Assertion or Withholding
Asserted Rights Category
Identify the technical data/software/patent to be furnished with restriction or withheld (insert “None” if no restrictions apply)
Indicate whether development was exclusively or partially at private expense. If development was not at private expense, enter the specific reason for asserting that the Government’s right should be restricted
Insert asserted rights category (e.g., limited rights (data), restricted rights (software), government purpose rights, SBIR data rights or specifically negotiated license)
Insert corporation or individual
*If COTS licenses will be required, please list them here.
SECTION 6.0 ROUGH ORDER OF MAGNITUDE (ROM) COST
Cost Share (if applicable) is proposed as follows:
Cash into Project: [Describe and quantify the proposed cash contribution(s) being made for use on the project, or insert N/A].
In-Kind Contributions: [Describe and quantify the proposed in-kind contribution(s) being made for use on the project, or insert N/A].
Cost Element
Subcontractor/Consultant Labor
$
Insert generic position titles, estimated rates and labor hours. If more than one Subcontractor is listed, provide cost break-out by Subcontractor.
Material/Equipment
Other Direct Costs (ODC)
Travel
$
Describe estimated travel (e.g., travel to customer site(s) for meetings, etc.)
Proposed Project Total
Consortium Fee
Total ROM Cost
*Amounts should be presented in whole dollars only
Affirmation of Business Status Certification
Each participant shall complete a separate certification. These certifications will not count toward the page limit.
Participant Name
Check one of the following boxes:
|_| Non-traditional Defense Contractor (NDC) — A Non-traditional Defense Contractor is an entity that is not currently performing and has not performed, for at least the one-year period preceding the issuance of this Request for White Papers by the Department of Defense, any contract or subcontract for the Department of Defense that is subject to full coverage under the cost accounting standards prescribed pursuant to Section 1502 of Title 41 of the U.S. Code and the regulations implementing such section.
All small businesses are considered NDCs. A small business is a business concern as defined under Section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632). To be considered a small business for the purposes of this RWP, a concern must qualify as a small business under the size standard for the proposed North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code, as described at 13 C.F.R. 121.201.
|_| Nonprofit Research Institution — means a nonprofit institution, as defined in 15 U.S.C. §3703, and includes federally funded research and development centers, as identified by the National Scientific Foundation in accordance with the Government-wide Federal Acquisition Regulation issued in accordance with 41 U.S.C. §1303(a)(1) (or any successor regulation thereto).
|_| Traditional Defense Contractor — A traditional defense contractor is an entity that does not meet the definition of a Non-traditional Defense Contractor (NDC) or a Nonprofit Research Institution.
This is to certify that the above is accurate, complete and current as of insert date for insert RWP number.
Signature (electronic signature is acceptable)
Date Signed
White Papers Due Date/Time
Submit White Papers To
Please advise CMG as soon as possible via email to [email protected] if your organization intends to submit a White Paper to CMG in response to this RWP.
Statement of Need
Title of Requirement: U.S. Navy C/KC-130T NP2000 Propeller Training System
RWP Number: N2517-19-065
Estimated Delivery Date of Prototype: August 2020
Security Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Problem Statement:
The C-130 has been operating as a Joint Service aircraft for the Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force for more than 40 years. As a part of a series of modernization upgrades, the Navy’s C/KC-130T aircraft are being modified with the NP2000 propeller system, replacing the current propeller system. The Navy conducts its formal aircrew and maintenance C-130 Training at the Air Logistics Training Center (ALTC), Joint Reserve Base, Fort Worth, Texas. ALTC utilizes motion and non-motion simulators to support the aircrew training curriculum and a small number of aging aircraft systems training devices to support the maintenance training curriculum. Students that successfully complete their training at ALTC will receive follow-on assignment to one of five operational Navy C/KC-130T squadrons. The Navy also operates the NP2000 propeller system on its fleet of C-2 Greyhound and E-2 Hawkeye aircraft, but there is no formal C/KC-130T NP2000 maintenance training pipeline.
PMA 207, the Navy’s C/KC-130 Program Office, is seeking an NP2000 prototype training simulator solution that will include NP2000 hardware to provide system theory of operation and maintenance task proficiency for squadron aircrew and maintenance personnel. This training solution shall include aircrew and maintenance operational checks, tasks, fault isolation, maintenance and corrective action procedures identified in the Navy’s C/KC-130T Flight and Maintenance Manuals. It will include maintenance operational checks for the NP2000 system and address the T-56 Engine’s role in power and propulsion of the C/KC-130T. The NP2000 prototype training solution shall simulate the fit and function of the NP2000 modified C/KC-130T to fully depict maintenance and operation within a controlled training environment. The solution will be evaluated to determine the effectiveness of training aircrew and maintenance personnel without a tactical aircraft.
Desired Objective:
The C/KC-130T NP2000 prototype training solution shall be the primary method used by instructors and students to become proficient in operating and maintaining the NP2000-modified C/KC-130T. The NP2000 prototype training solution shall include a prototype hands-on NP2000 Propeller Maintenance Trainer, Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Maintenance Training (VMT). The NP2000 prototype Propeller Maintenance Trainer shall use the Government Furnished Equipment listed below or simulate that equipment to provide the same operation and tactile response required for training. The introduction of this new capability will require additional digital training media as part of the prototype C/KC-130T NP2000 training solution. Following instruction utilizing the digital training media, the students will require hands-on training utilizing a training device representative of the actual C/KC-130T aircraft engine and NP2000 propeller. The NP2000 Propeller maintenance training device may be permanently located on the hangar deck at ALTC.
The Government will make the following equipment and information available for use in the prototype solution.
- One T-56 Engine (non-Electronic Propeller Control System modified)
- NP2000 Propeller Hub, Part Number (P/N) 1006581-2
- NP2000 Propeller Adaptor, P/N 820612-2
- C-130T NP2000 Navy Maintenance Manuals
- C-130T NP2000 Navy Flight Manual (NATOPS)
- Airframes Change (AFC) Number 494
- Drawing (96916) 14A3243, AFC-494 Installation Data Instructions
The Government will make the following equipment available for use in the prototype solution on or about July 2020. Technical data on these items can be provided earlier than July 2020, as needed.
1. NP2000 Actuator Valve Module, P/N 1006712-2
2. NP2000 Spinner, P/N 825818-2
3. NP200 Aft Spinner, P/N 825869-2
4. NP2000 Pitch Change Actuator, P/N 826615-3
The Government is attempting to make available a minimum of one and a maximum of eight NP2000 Propeller blades for use in the prototype solution. For the purpose of White Paper submissions, the offeror should plan for the Government to make one NP2000 propeller blade available.
Although not anticipated to be necessary for this prototype project, additional NP2000 Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) data may be available if the offerors enter into a non-disclosure agreement with the NP2000 OEM.
Minimum capability requirements of the Prototype:
1. C/KC-130T NP2000 Propeller Maintenance training device that allows instructor to activate C-130T aircraft, engine and NP2000 related faults that would result in a simulated C/KC-130T NP2000 malfunction.
2. C/KC-130T NP2000 Propeller Maintenance training device that allows students, under instructor supervision, to perform fault identification, isolation and maintenance procedures in accordance with (IAW) NAVAIR maintenance publications to return the C/CK-130T NP2000 system to full operation. Maintenance procedures include removal and replacement of the NP2000 Propeller from the T-56 Engine and removal and replacement of individual propeller blades.
3. Digital instruction media that includes AR/VR/VMT technology that enables instructors to train students on:
· C/KC-130T NP2000 System components, theory of operation, limitations, servicing, safety precautions
· C/KC-130T NP2000 Maintenance procedures identified in NAVAIR maintenance publications
· C/KC-130T NP2000 Aircrew NATOPS procedures
4. Navy C-130T aircrew and maintenance personnel with no previous NP2000 or C-130T experience are able to successfully pass a written NP2000 knowledge test within the allotted time. Testing will occur following Government-led instruction utilizing the prototype NP2000 digital media, associated AR/VR/VMT aids and the Propeller Maintenance Trainer. The success criteria will be developed with the guidance of the Navy School Testing Program Management Manual (NAVEDTRA 132).
5. Navy C-130T maintenance personnel with no previous NP2000 or C-130T experience are able to successfully pass practical knowledge/skills-based task tests. These tests will require the performance of NP2000 Maintenance procedures covered in the Navy’s C-130T NP2000 Maintenance Procedure Manuals and be performed using the NP2000 Propeller Maintenance Trainer. Skills-based task testing will include fault identification, fault isolation, fault repair and return of the NP2000 system to full operation. The success criteria will be developed with the guidance of the Navy School Testing Program Management Manual (NAVEDTRA 132).
6. VMT products that are part of the prototype solution shall have the ability to be loaded and operated on the existing ALTC VMT system. The existing VMT system is comprised of a 3MTM Touch Display running Government-owned software developed with the Unity Gaming Software Engine.
7. Virtual 3D Models of NP2000 components or systems contain a free play mode for students to interact and gain familiarity with the system(s).
8. Digital media in a file format that allows students to upload to a portable handheld device such as an iPhone/iPad/Android device.
9. NP2000 Propeller Maintenance Trainer fits safely within the allocated ALTC Hangar deck space. Allocated Hangar deck space is Length 24ft x Width 24ft x Height 30ft.
10. NP2000 Propeller Maintenance Trainer is designed to facilitate the safe instruction of up to six (6) students simultaneously.
White papers which do not provide the minimum required information will not be evaluated. All white papers which provide the minimum required information and propose a viable technical solution which meets the previously defined capabilities, scope and requirements will be evaluated and will form the pool of responses from which selection will occur. Following selection, the Government will use the solution presented in the white paper as the basis for the development of a detailed Statement of Work (SOW).
*******Only Government personnel will evaluate the White Papers*********
Production: Successful completion of the initial prototype may result in award of follow-on production under provisions of Other Transaction Authority 10 U.S.C. § 2371b(f).
WHITE PAPER INSTRUCTIONS
Overview
An RWP is issued by CMG to solicit White Papers from consortium members that detail their proposed technology solutions to address the challenges outlined in the corresponding Government Statement of Need (SON).
CMG members can submit White Papers individually, or collaborate via a team. CMG will work with each interested member to ensure that government expectations are met and statutory compliance is maintained. Draft White Papers must be submitted to CMG by the member deadline specified in this RWP for review for completeness and compliance. Upon completion of that review, the White Papers will be forwarded to the Government by CMG.
CMG members solely are responsible for all expenses associated with responding to this RWP. White Papers shall conform to the White Paper Template and adhere to the formatting instructions.
Non-traditional Defense Contractor Participation or Cost-Share Commitment
Each Prototype Project awarded under an Other Transaction Agreement (OTA) must meet at least one of the following conditions:
There is at least one Non-traditional Defense Contractor (NDC), small business or nonprofit research institution participating to a significant extent in the Prototype Project, or
At least one-third of the total cost of the Prototype Project is to be paid out of funds provided by parties to the transaction other than the Federal Government.
What is an NDC?
An NDC is an entity that is not currently performing and has not performed, for at least one year preceding the issuance of a prototype project solicitation, any contract or subcontract for the DoD that is subject to full coverage under the FAR-based Cost Accounting Standards (“CAS”). Full CAS coverage is required typically for contracts greater than $50 million. Firm-fixed price contracts and contracts with small businesses are exempt from all CAS requirements regardless of dollar value.
How Does an Entity Determine if it is an NDC?
A review of an entity’s DoD cost-plus contracts and subcontracts on which it has performed during the previous year will aid in determining NDC status. If none of the contracts or subcontracts was subject to full CAS coverage, then the entity is an NDC. OTA awards do not impact NDC status, as CAS does not apply to OTAs.
Are Small Businesses Automatically Considered NDCs?
Yes. Since contracts and subcontracts with small businesses are exempt from all CAS requirements, small businesses are deemed NDCs under OT Authority. An entity is considered a small business based upon its applicable North American Industry Classification System (“NAICS”) designation (as described at 13 C.F.R. §121.201) for the specific nature of the work being proposed.
Are Nonprofit Research Institutions Considered NDCs?
The 2018 NDAA made Nonprofit Research Institutions essentially the same as NDCs with respect to OT Authority.
Can a Subsidiary or a Division of a Corporation Qualify as an NDC?
Yes. Provided the definition of an NDC is met, the entity can be at the prime level, team members, sub-awardees, lower-tier vendors or intra-company business units, including a subsidiary or division of a Traditional Defense Contractor.
Regarding NDC Participation, What does “Significant” Mean?
Significant participation is determined on a project basis and is based on the importance of the NDC contribution to the overall execution or outcome of the proposed project. OT Authority statute does not prescribe a monetary threshold or percentage value to justify significance. Examples of “significant” participation are:
Supplying a new key technology or product, or unique capability;
Causing a material and quantifiable reduction in the project cost or schedule;
Causing a measurable increase in the performance of the prototype;
Accomplishing a significant amount of the effort;
Value-added analysis not based on percentage of project work or value.
How does a Traditional Defense Contractor Satisfy the Cost-sharing Requirement?
If the member responding to an RWP is a Traditional Defense Contractor and there is no significant participation by an NDC in the project, the Traditional Defense Contractor is required to expend resources on the project amounting to one-third of the project cost. Cost-sharing does not involve funds paid directly to the Government. There are two types of cost-sharing:
Cash—outlays of funds to perform under the project for labor, materials, new equipment or subcontractor effort; sources can include new IR&D funds, profit or fee from another contract, and overhead or capital equipment expense pool;
In-Kind—reasonable value of equipment, materials or other property used in performance under the project.
White Paper Format
The White Paper (WP) template is provided as an attachment to this RWP. The following formatting requirements apply:
Times New Roman 10 (or larger), single-spaced, single-sided, 8.5 by 11 inches
Smaller type may be used in figures and tables, but must be clearly legible
Margins on all sides (top, bottom, left and right) should be at least 1 inch
Page limit is ten (10) pages; excluding White Paper Cover Sheet and Affirmation of Business Status Certification(s)
WPs shall include a cover sheet, not counted toward the page limit, that includes:
· Prototype Project Title
· Primary point of contact, secondary point of contact, and FSO, if applicable, including name, address, phone, and e-mail contact information
· Total Solution Rough-Order-of-Magnitude price
Shaded text in the White Paper Template indicates areas for entry of information by the member. Shading should be removed before submittal of the White Paper.
DO NOT SUBMIT ANY CLASSIFIED INFORMATION
Technical Requirements
Background and Benefits of Proposed Solution
Technical Approach, including clearly defined prototype solution
Schedule and Deliverables
Data Rights Assertions: Identify any intellectual property, patents and inventions involved in the proposed solution and associated restrictions on Government use of that intellectual property, patents, and inventions. The following information shall be presented for all assertions:
· Technical data, computer software or patent to be furnished with restriction
· Basis for assertion
· Asserted rights category
If no restrictions are applied, insert “None” in each column.
Data Rights Withholding: Identify any technical data or software involved in the proposed solution that shall NOT be delivered for Government use. The following information shall be presented:
· Technical data and computer software being withheld
· Name of entity owning the technical data and computer software
If no restrictions are applied, state No Withholding.
Cost Section Requirements
The Government will be considering affordability in making its source selection decision; therefore, the White Paper shall contain cost information as requested in the table in Section 6.0 of the White Paper Template.
Evaluation Criteria
The Government will conduct an evaluation of all eligible WPs submitted in response to this RWP based on an integrated assessment of the following:
The degree to which the solution meets the requirements of the SON.
Evaluation of the potential impacts of the data rights assertions.
Evaluation of significant nontraditional or one-third (1/3) cost share, if applicable.
Evaluation of proposed ROM price against government funding profile.
Evaluation of vendor’s experience in developing and fielding similar C-130 training solutions
Basis for Selection
It is the Government’s intention to select, negotiate and fund Prototype Projects from the submitted WP(s). The WP selection will be conducted in accordance with the Government’s procedures and the evaluation criteria identified herein. The Government will make a determination whether to:
Select the WP(s), or some portion of the WP(s), and/or
Retain the WP(s) in a library for potential future requirements in accordance with the terms of the OTA.
The WP selection decision will be provided to CMG, and the Government will issue a Request for Proposal(s) to CMG for the selected WP(s).
Affirmation of Business Status Certification
Each participant proposed in the WP shall complete the Business Status Certification which is provided as an attachment to this RWP.
These certifications shall be included as an attachment to the WP and will not count toward the page limit.
Export Control
Research findings and technology developments arising from the resulting RWP may constitute a significant enhancement to the national defense and to the economic vitality of the United States. As such, in the conduct of all work under the subsequent PPA(s), the recipient will comply strictly with the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (22 CFR 120-130), the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (DoD 5220.22-M) and the Department of Commerce Export Regulation (15 CFR 730-774).
N2517-19-065
Points of Contact
Questions regarding White Paper procedures should be directed to the CMG Contract Management Office, 540-937-6300 or via email to [email protected] .
WHITE PAPER TEMPLATE
RWP Number
Insert RWP Number from Request for White Papers (RWP) cover page
Proposed Project Title
Submittal Date
Submitted By
Consortium Member Point of Contact (POC)*
*Note: POCs shall be from the prime member’s corporation, please do not insert contact information for subcontractor participants.
POC Name
POC Address
POC Phone
POC Email
Less Cost Share
Total (Less Cost Share)
$ Insert amount after cost share deducted, rounded to the nearest dollar
Consortium Fee
$ Insert 3.8% Applied to Total Price per the OTA terms
Total ROM Cost
$ Insert Total Amount
X
SECTION 1.0 Background AND BENEFITS OF PROPOSED SOLUTION
Describe the proposed solution, including how the Government’s requirements shown in the Statement of Need are being addressed. Provide a brief description of the “new” capability that will result.
SECTION 2.0 TECHNICAL approach
Describe the design and detailed technical approach for achieving the proposed prototype solution. Clearly describe the proposed prototype and ensure that it is included as a deliverable in Section 3.0.
SECTION 2.1 PROJECT TASKS
Describe the specific tasks required for project execution. If a phased/element approach is indicated in the Government Statement of Need, the tasks shall be detailed by phase/element.
SECTION 2.2 RISKS
Describe the technical maturity of the proposed solution and its readiness to meet the Government’s requirements. Describe any technical, cost and schedule risks associated with achieving the proposed solution.
SECTION 3.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE AND DELIVERABLES
Milestone
Deliverable
Insert list of milestones
Insert list of deliverables associated with each milestone (at a minimum, the proposed prototype and a final report must be included as deliverables)
Insert estimated lead time in terms of months after award for each milestone/deliverable.
The total proposed project duration is [Insert proposed period of performance in months] months from project award.
SECTION 4.0 PARTICIPANTS
Insert Consortium Member
Insert detailed, quantifiable description which addresses the following:
1. What specific tasks will this Participant be accomplishing for this project?
1. Why are these Participant's tasks significant to this project?*
1. How is this Participant uniquely qualified to provide these tasks for this project?
Insert separate row(s) for each additional participant. Delete row(s) as applicable if Consortium Member is the only participant.
|_| Traditional
|_| Non-traditional
Insert detailed, quantifiable description which addresses the following:
1. What specific tasks will this Participant be accomplishing for this project?
1. Why are these Participant's tasks significant to this project?*
1. How is this Participant uniquely qualified to provide these tasks for this project?
*Significance is defined as supplying a new key technology or product, accomplishing a significant amount of the effort, causing a material reduction in the cost or scheduling or causing an increase in the performance. Any vendor proposing labor costs must be listed as a participant.
SECTION 5.0 DATA RIGHTS
Data Rights Assertions: All intellectual property, patents and inventions involved in the proposed solution and the associated restrictions on the Government’s use of that intellectual property, patents and inventions are presented in the table below. If no assertions are being made, state as such.
Data Rights Withholding: Identify any technical data or software involved in the proposed solution that shall NOT be delivered for Government use are presented in the table below. If none, state No Withholdings.
Technical Data/ Computer Software/ Patent to be Furnished with Restrictions or Withheld
Basis for Assertion or Withholding
Asserted Rights Category
Identify the technical data/software/patent to be furnished with restriction or withheld (insert “None” if no restrictions apply)
Indicate whether development was exclusively or partially at private expense. If development was not at private expense, enter the specific reason for asserting that the Government’s right should be restricted
Insert asserted rights category (e.g., limited rights (data), restricted rights (software), government purpose rights, SBIR data rights or specifically negotiated license)
Insert corporation or individual
*If COTS licenses will be required, please list them here.
SECTION 6.0 ROUGH ORDER OF MAGNITUDE (ROM) COST
Cost Share (if applicable) is proposed as follows:
Cash into Project: [Describe and quantify the proposed cash contribution(s) being made for use on the project, or insert N/A].
In-Kind Contributions: [Describe and quantify the proposed in-kind contribution(s) being made for use on the project, or insert N/A].
Cost Element
Subcontractor/Consultant Labor
$
Insert generic position titles, estimated rates and labor hours. If more than one Subcontractor is listed, provide cost break-out by Subcontractor.
Material/Equipment
Other Direct Costs (ODC)
Travel
$
Describe estimated travel (e.g., travel to customer site(s) for meetings, etc.)
Proposed Project Total
Consortium Fee
Total ROM Cost
*Amounts should be presented in whole dollars only
Affirmation of Business Status Certification
Each participant shall complete a separate certification. These certifications will not count toward the page limit.
Participant Name
Check one of the following boxes:
|_| Non-traditional Defense Contractor (NDC) — A Non-traditional Defense Contractor is an entity that is not currently performing and has not performed, for at least the one-year period preceding the issuance of this Request for White Papers by the Department of Defense, any contract or subcontract for the Department of Defense that is subject to full coverage under the cost accounting standards prescribed pursuant to Section 1502 of Title 41 of the U.S. Code and the regulations implementing such section.
All small businesses are considered NDCs. A small business is a business concern as defined under Section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632). To be considered a small business for the purposes of this RWP, a concern must qualify as a small business under the size standard for the proposed North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code, as described at 13 C.F.R. 121.201.
|_| Nonprofit Research Institution — means a nonprofit institution, as defined in 15 U.S.C. §3703, and includes federally funded research and development centers, as identified by the National Scientific Foundation in accordance with the Government-wide Federal Acquisition Regulation issued in accordance with 41 U.S.C. §1303(a)(1) (or any successor regulation thereto).
|_| Traditional Defense Contractor — A traditional defense contractor is an entity that does not meet the definition of a Non-traditional Defense Contractor (NDC) or a Nonprofit Research Institution.
This is to certify that the above is accurate, complete and current as of insert date for insert RWP number.
Signature (electronic signature is acceptable)
Date Signed