home movers survey report - hampshire · hampshire, portsmouth and southampton home movers survey...

1

Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

Home Movers Survey 2010

Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton Home Movers Survey 2010

2

Foreword

The Hampshire Home Movers Survey 2010 is the latest in a series of

publications on housing market trends. The last survey was conducted in

2002 and covered the occupiers of new and previously occupied properties

and rented dwellings.

This report collates information about people who moved into homes in

Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton during the year 2008/09. It

explores where they previously lived, their reasons for moving, the type,

tenure and size of their new home, and their satisfaction with it. This insight

into the type, size and tenure of properties changing hands, and the new

occupiers’ origin, household size and satisfaction will assist population

forecasting and the formulation of new planning policies.

This survey has been undertaken by Hampshire County Council on behalf of

Hampshire district councils and the two unitary authorities of Southampton

and Portsmouth. Thanks are due to the Hampshire councils for providing the

sample addresses and to the individuals who completed the questionnaires.

Without their help, this survey would not have been possible.

Finally, all references in this document to ‘Hampshire’ should be interpreted

as meaning the combined administrative area of Hampshire County Council,

Southampton City Council and Portsmouth City Council.

If you have any questions or comments about this document, please contact

Hampshire County Council’s Spatial Strategy and Research Group at the

below address;

Spatial Strategy & Research Group, Environment Department, Hampshire County Council 2nd Floor, EII Court West, The Castle, Winchester, SO23 8UD Tel: 01962 846806 Email: [email protected] or [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]



3

Contents Page 1. Executive Summary 4 2. Methodology 6 3. Validity of the results 6 4. Results 8 4.1 All Properties 10 Figure 4.1 All Properties: Tenure Figure 4.2 All Properties: House Type Figure 4.3 All Properties: Size of Property Figure 4.4 All Properties: Household and property size Figure 4.5 All Properties: Size of Household Figure 4.6 All Properties: Previous residence of movers Figure 4.7 All Properties: Reasons for moving house Figure 4.8 All Properties: Where adult movers work Figure 4.9 All Properties: Dissatisfaction 4.2 Owner Occupiers 18 Figure 4.10 Owner Occupiers: House type of movers Figure 4.11 Owner Occupiers: Household and Property Size Figure 4.12 Owner Occupiers: Previous residence of movers Figure 4.13 Owner Occupiers: Reasons for moving house 4.3 Private Renters 22 Figure 4.14 Private Renters: House type of movers Figure 4.15 Private Renters: Household and Property Size Figure 4.16 Private Renters: Previous residence of movers Figure 4.17 Private Renters: Reasons for moving house Appendix A: Sample Questionnaire 25 Appendix B: New Build completions in 2008-2009 (Private and 27 Registered Social Landlord dwellings) Appendix C: Map showing Hampshire’s districts, towns and 28 surrounding counties Appendix D: Data Tables 29


4

1. Executive Summary 1. Executive Summary 1.1 The results of the Home Movers Survey show approximately half of

recent movers in Hampshire are owner occupiers with residents purchasing a variety of dwelling types; a significant decrease on previous studies. Over half of all purchases were either detached or semi-detached dwellings with the exception of Rushmoor, Southampton, Portsmouth and Gosport, which saw a dominance of flats. Most moves (regardless of tenure) were into two or three bedroom homes. Substantial numbers of larger dwellings are being occupied by small households. Most properties are being occupied by people that originated from Hampshire prior to their move.

1.2 There were some noticeable differences in the findings of this survey compared to the 2002 survey. The percentage of movers that are owner occupiers has reduced significantly from nearly 80% in the 2002 survey to 53% in this survey whilst the number of movers that are privately renting has increased from 9% in 2002 to 26%. There have also been changes in the types of dwelling chosen by home movers. The percentage of moves into detached dwellings has dropped from 40% in 2002 to 27% in this survey. The proportion moving into flats has increased from 20% in 2002 to 26% in this survey. When examining travel to work patterns nearly half (48%) of all adult movers’ place of work is in the same district in Hampshire as the one in which they live. This is over 10% greater than in the previous survey (at 37%). However, the number of movers that commute outside of Hampshire to work has increased from 17% in 2002 to 21% in this survey. 1.3 The key points of this survey are as follows: All movers:-

Just over half of all those who moved now owner-occupy (53%), a quarter (26%) rent privately.

17% have moved into social housing or a housing association property, 2% purchased a shared ownership property, and 1% moved into dwellings provided by their employer.

In every district except Portsmouth and Southampton there was a fairly even split of households moving into detached, semi-detached, terraced and flats.

In Portsmouth and Southampton, the picture is quite different, with over 40% moving into flats. Portsmouth also had an above average number of movers (35%) going into terraced dwellings.

3 and 4 bedroom properties accounted for half of all moves (50%), with almost as many moves to 1 and 2 bedroom homes (47%).

Properties with 5 or more bedrooms account for an above average number of moves in Winchester at 8%. Conversely, at least 60% of


5

the moves in Havant, Portsmouth, Gosport and Rushmoor were into 1 and 2 bedroom homes.

Across Hampshire, most larger households live in larger properties, but substantial numbers of dwellings with three or more bedrooms are being occupied by one and two person households.

The majority (nearly two thirds) of all movers already lived in Hampshire. The exception to this is Hart, where people moving from outside Hampshire took up 56% of all properties that changed hands (Hart is situated towards the north-east corner of Hampshire - see map contained in Appendix C).

Across Hampshire as a whole, only 3% of properties were occupied by people moving from Greater London; most in-migrants came from adjacent counties or from within parts of the UK which is outside the South East region.

People moved for a wide range of reasons; there was no single dominant one. The top five were: previous home too small, to be nearer relatives, to live in a more attractive area, able to afford a better property, and ‘other’.

Owner Occupiers:-

In Hampshire, over 66% of properties purchased were either ‘detached’ or semi-detached’.

13% of properties purchased by home movers were flats. Portsmouth had the largest proportion of owner occupiers moving

into terraced housing, at 42%. 15.8% of owner occupiers in this survey were first time buyers Owner occupiers’ previous place of residence, relationship of

household size to property size, and reasons for moving home are similar to ‘all movers’.

Privately Rented:-

In Hampshire, 35% of private renters moved into flats, with a remaining 64% into either detached, semi-detached or terraced housing

Data indicated that household size correlated with property size more closely for private rented homes compared to all tenures or owner occupied homes

37% of movers into private rented accommodation originated from outside Hampshire

10% of movers into private rented accommodation came from outside the UK

People moved for a variety of reasons, however a move related to a new job featured more highly, consisting of 18% of reasons provided


6

2. Methodology 2.1 This survey was undertaken by sending a questionnaire to the

occupiers of a representative sample (around 5,000) of properties which had changed hands during 2008/ 2009. The sample size of 5,000 was chosen as this was the same as that used in the 2002 Home Movers Survey. The response to the 2002 survey had produced a sufficiently large sample for analysis and the results were considered as being representative of all movers. The sample was obtained from Council Tax records held by City, Borough and District Councils. The only information passed to Hampshire County Council were the addresses of the sample of properties; names and other personal information were not involved. The questionnaires were address to “The Occupier” of the properties selected. A copy of the questionnaire is in Appendix A.

3. Validity of the results 3.1 A total of 901 questionnaires were used in the analysis, which is an overall response rate of 18%. Whilst this is below the 1627 questionnaires returned from the previous survey, it is still a large enough sample to be reliable at county level. 3.2 However, where data is reported at district level it should be borne in mind that the number of questionnaires in districts range from 125 in East Hampshire down to a mere 37 in Gosport, as shown in the following table. These numbers of returned survey forms show no similar proportionality to the number of dwellings in their respective districts. 3.3 Because of this, any district-level data that are then subsequently split into categories are best considered to be a broad indication of what the result could have been if all movers had been surveyed, rather than as a true representation of all movers. 3.4 The number of relevant questionnaires contributing to the results are shown with each table/chart in Appendix D.


7

District Number of returned

questionnaires Proportion of questionnaires

East Hampshire 125 13.9% Basingstoke & Deane

96 10.7%

New Forest 90 10.0% Southampton 80 8.9% Eastleigh 68 7.6% Portsmouth 66 7.3% Winchester 65 7.2% Test Valley 64 7.1% Fareham 60 6.7% Havant 55 6.1% Hart 52 5.8% Rushmoor 41 4.6% Gosport 37 4.1% Total 899*

* 2 respondents did not disclose their new address

3.5 The survey included new and previously occupied properties and

embraced both owner occupied and rented property. However, the number of rented properties was too small to enable statistically valid analysis of the rented sector at district level (given the small sample size). Thus this report presents information solely in respect of all properties, all owner occupied properties and the rented sector at county level only.

3.6 In interpreting the information in this survey, it should be remembered

that it relates only to those who moved home in 2008 and 2009. Whilst it provides an important insight into home movers – who drive the demand for new properties which is a principal issue for the planning system in relation to housing – the data is not necessarily representative of all properties nor the whole population of the area.


8

4. Results

4.1 All properties Figure 4.1 All Properties: Tenure

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Basing

stoke

& Dea

ne

East H

amps

hire

Eastle

igh

Fareha

m

Gospo

rtHart

Havan

t

New Fore

st

Portsm

outh

Rushm

oor

Southa

mpton

Test V

alley

Winche

ster

Hamps

hire

District of new abode

% o

f Hom

e M

over

s

Shared ownershipRented from council/housing associationProvided by employerPrivately rentedOwner occupied

Sample size: 882 General Picture: 53% of all home movers in Hampshire are owner occupiers. This is a

significant decrease from the 2002 survey when 78% of movers were owner occupiers.

The remaining movers mostly went into privately rented homes which significantly increased from 9% in 2002 to 26% in 2009.

17% moved into social housing and 1% into properties provided by their employer.

13% of questionnaires stated that they were the first occupiers of their new property. Further analysis is possible, however, it should not be considered statistically significant due to the small numbers involved.

Key findings for districts: Just over half of home movers in each district are home owners, with the

exception of Havant, Gosport, Winchester and the cities of Southampton and Portsmouth. Southampton had the lowest proportion of movers into owner occupied properties, at 28%. East Hampshire has the highest proportion of owner occupiers at 67%.

Havant has the highest proportion of movers going into social housing at 43% which was significantly higher than all the other districts. Southampton has also a high proportion at of movers going into social housing (36%).


9

The proportion of movers going into privately rented properties was highest in Portsmouth, accounting for 43% of all movers. This pattern was also evident in the 2002, however, this sector has seen a marked increase from the previous figure of 22%.

Basingstoke and Deane contains the highest percentage of movers going into shared equity homes at 7%. This is much higher than the average for Hampshire at 2%.


10

Figure 4.2 All Properties: House type

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%Bas

ingsto

ke & D

eane

East H

amps

hire

Eastle

ighFare

ham

Gospo

rtHart

Havan

tNew

Forest

Portsm

outh

Rushm

oor

Southa

mpton

Test V

alley

Winche

ster

Hamps

hire

District

% o

f all

mov

ers

Detached Semi detached Terraced Flat Sheltered housing Sample size: 838 General Picture: When examining Hampshire as a whole, home movers chose a wide variety

of house type with similar proportions moving into flats and detached, semi-detached and terraced housing. This is a significant change from 2002, when 40% of movers were moving to a detached dwelling, (now 27%) and 20% moved into flats (now 26%).

Key findings for districts: Portsmouth and Southampton have the lowest proportion of movers going

into detached houses at 8%, followed by Rushmoor at 11%. Portsmouth and Southampton have the highest proportion of movers going

into flats at 42% and 41% respectively, a figure much higher than the average for Hampshire at 26%. This was the most common choice for movers in both cities – or further information into the housing stock and the nature of new builds in recent years (see Appendix B: New build completions 2008-2009)

Conversely New Forest registered the highest levels of movers into detached houses at 47%. East Hampshire was the second highest at 39%.

The highest proportion of movers going into terraced housing was in Portsmouth and Gosport at 35% and 31%.


11

Figure 4.3 All Properties: Size of Property

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Basing

stoke

& Dea

ne

East H

amps

hire

Eastle

igh

Fareha

m

Gospo

rtHart

Havan

t

New Fore

st

Portsm

outh

Rushm

oor

Southa

mpton

Test V

alley

Winc

heste

r

Hamps

hire

District

% o

f Mov

ers

One Bedroom Two Bedrooms Three Bedrooms Four bedrooms Five or more bedrooms Sample size 888 General Picture: In Hampshire two and three bedroom dwellings are the most popular size of

dwelling amongst movers, accounting for 64% of dwellings changing hands. One and four bedroom properties account for 17% and 16% of movers respectively. Only 3% of all moves were into properties with five or more bedrooms.

Key findings for districts: Hart had the highest proportion of movers living in dwellings with four or

more bedrooms Conversely Southampton and Havant had the greatest proportion of one

bedroom dwellings amongst movers. Three bedroom properties comprise of 44% in Test Valley and 41% in

Basingstoke and Deane. This was closely followed by Fareham at 39% and Winchester 37%. Gosport had a far lower percentage of movers in this category at 19%.


12

Figure 4.4 All Properties: Household and property size

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

One Bedroom Two Bedrooms Three Bedrooms Four or MoreBedrooms

% o

f mov

ers

Sample size: 886 Figure 4.5 All Properties: Size of Household

29%

38%

15%

14%4%

One person household Two person householdThree person household Four person householdMore than five person household

Sample Size: 886 General Picture: In Hampshire the size of property is generally correlated to the size of the

movers household. However, a substantial proportion of dwellings with three or more bedrooms

are being occupied by one or two person households 30% of one person households moved into a property with three or more

bedrooms


13

70% of one bedroom properties were occupied by single households and 28% by two person households.

29% of all movers were single households, a further 38% were two person households. Approximately a third of all movers who responded were in households of three or more people.


14

Figure 4.6 All properties: Previous residence of movers now living in Hampshire

Elsewhere in Hampshire

19%

Outside Hampshire

28%

Adjacent counties9%

Rest of the UK9%

Rest of the South East2%

Outside UK4%

Greater London3%

Same District 53%

Sample:1483 (Movers could be forming new households, having not previously lived together, and in some circumstances were from different areas. Therefore questionnaires returned could state more than one response. Please note that due to rounding, figures may not equal 100% in all cases.) General Picture: The majority of home movers have moved within the same district, at 53%,

or from elsewhere in Hampshire, at 19%. Of the remaining movers, the two most significant origins are the adjoining counties and the rest of the United Kingdom (excluding South East England). Few are moving from Greater London (see Appendix C: for a location map of Hampshire’s districts and the adjoining neighbouring authorities).

Key findings for districts: Hart had a significantly higher proportion of people moving into the district

from outside Hampshire, at 56%. Winchester and Havant have the highest proportion of people moving from

‘elsewhere’ within Hampshire, at 35% and 34% respectively. Test Valley had a significantly higher proportion of people moving within the

same district, at approximately 84%. This was followed by New Forest at 63%.


15

Figure 4.7: All properties: Reasons for moving home

End of rental period 4%

Other change in personal

circumstances 6%

Health reasons 2%

Other reasons 15%

Retirement 6%

Move related to new job

9%

Good investment 3%

Able to afford a better property

9%Previous home

too large 6%

Previous home too small

14%

To be nearer good schools

3% To be nearer relatives

12%

To live in a more attractive area

12%

Sample Size: 1200 (respondents were allowed to give up to two answers each). General Picture: In Hampshire there is no one single overriding reason for moving. Rather

there is a split between several reasons. As respondents frequently choose ‘other’ as a reason for moving (20%), this

was sub-grouped further into categories, such as ‘health reasons’ and ‘change in personal circumstance’ to make best use of the data available. All the remainder of written answers were grouped as ‘other’ because no common theme was identified.

Even after this process, the most common reason for moving at 15% was ‘other’, which could include various reasons not included in the categories listed.

The second most common reason for moving was that the ‘previous home was too small’ at 14%.

Key findings for districts: ‘Other’ was the most common reason given in Southampton (28%) and

Gosport (26%). In Hart, a ‘move related to job’ was the most common reason,

corresponding to 25% of respondents. This is also one of the main reasons in Winchester.

In Rushmoor, the most common reason for moving was due to being ‘able to afford a better property’ at 17%.

In New Forest, the main reason for moving house is to ‘live near relatives’, corresponding to 17% of responses.


16

Figure 4.8 All Properties: Where adult movers work

Outside Hampshire

21%


31%

Same district 48%

Greater London5%

Outside UK1%

Rest of the UK1%

Adjacent counties

14%

Rest of the South East Region

0%

Sample Size: 965 General Picture: Nearly half (48%) of all adult movers’ place of work is in the same district in

Hampshire to the one in which they live. This is much higher than in the previous survey (37%)

A further 31% of adult movers work elsewhere in Hampshire. The remaining 21% work outside of Hampshire, with a significant amount of

movers working in adjoining counties at 14%. 5% of movers work in Greater London, which is a decrease from 9% in the

2002 survey. Key findings for Districts: Adult movers living and working in the same Hampshire district constitute a

significant proportion in many districts, ranging from 18% in Hart to 84% in Southampton.

However, in over half of the districts the proportion of adult movers working in Hampshire but within a district that is different to the one in which they live was also significant. This is particularly evident in Havant (59%) and Eastleigh (59%) and Fareham (54%).

55% of workplaces for adult movers in Hart are located outside of Hampshire, followed by Rushmoor at 51%.

When examining those who work in Greater London, 25% now live in East Hampshire, 15% in Hart, 15% in Basingstoke and Deane, and 11% in Winchester. There are no recent home movers that work in Greater London and live in either Gosport or Southampton.


17

Figure 4.9 All Properties: Dissatisfaction

Traffic too heavy6%

Prefer older properties

2%Prefer living in the countryside

11%

Not enough facilities close by

9%

No, or limited, off street parking

11%

Area too noisy7%

Do not like house type11%

Do not like the neighbourhood

8%

Garden to small11%

Home too small24%

Sample size: 287 (Respondents were given the maximum choice of three reasons for being dissatisfied with their property.) General Picture: 82.5% of all movers state that their current property meets their housing

aspirations This means that 17.5% of movers have moved into a property which does

not meet their housing aspirations although this is down from 29% in the previous survey

Where movers current housing aspirations have not been met, the most common reasons cited are that the home is too small at 24%. This was followed by concerns about off-street parking, type of house, small garden and a preference for living in the countryside


18

4.2 Owner Occupiers Figure 4.10 Owner Occupiers: House type

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Basing

stoke

& D

eane

East H

amps

hire

Eastle

igh

Fareha

m

Gospo

rtHart

Havan

t

New Fore

st

Portsm

outh

Rushm

oor

Southa

mpton

Test V

alley

Winche

ster

Hamps

hire

District

% o

f Hom

e M

over

s

Detached Semi detached Terraced Flat Sheltered housing Sample Size: 437 General Picture: Over a third of owner-occupied properties changing hands in each district

are detached dwellings, except in Southampton, Rushmoor, Portsmouth and Gosport.

In Hampshire, over 66% of properties purchased were either ‘detached’ or ‘semi-detached’ dwellings.

13% of properties purchased by home movers were flats. First Time buyers: 15.8% of home owners in the survey were first time buyers. Given the small

sample size, this data had not been analysed further. Key Findings for districts: Portsmouth has the largest proportion of owner occupiers moving into

terraced housing, at 42% New Forest has the largest proportion of owner occupiers moving into

detached houses at 62%, with a further 13% being semi-detached properties. The second largest proportion of owner occupiers buying a detached house was in the districts of Winchester and Hart, at 48%


19

Figure 4.11 Owner Occupiers: Household and property size

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%


% o

f mov

ers

(ow

ner o

ccup

iers

onl

y)

Sample Size: 468 General Picture: Property size is quite closely correlated to the size of the moving household.

However, approximately 23% of three bedroom properties and 9% of four bedroom dwellings are being occupied by a one person household.

41% of four or more bedroom properties are being occupied by two person households.

Generally the proportion of single person households decreased as the property size increased.


20

Figure 4.12 Owner Occupiers: Previous residence of movers Elsewhere in Hampshire

23%

Same District 50%

Outside UK2%Adjacent

counties11%

Other27%

Rest of the UK9%

Greater London4%

Rest of the South East1%

Sample Size: 807 General Picture: The origins of owner occupiers are similar to that of all properties, with 50%

of all moves occurring within the same district (as compared with 53% for all moves, regardless of tenure).

Key Findings for Districts: Havant had the lowest proportion of owner occupiers who previously lived

within the same district, at 19%. However, Havant had the highest proportion of owner occupiers from elsewhere in Hampshire at 59%. This was mostly from neighbouring authorities, such as Portsmouth (24%) and East Hants (13%).

Test Valley had a significantly higher proportion of owner occupiers from the same district at 81%. The second highest was Portsmouth at 67%. This was similar for all movers from all tenures.

Hart had the highest proportion of owner occupiers who had previously lived outside Hampshire, at 57%. Rushmoor followed with 38% of movers from outside Hampshire.


21

Figure 4.13 Owner Occupiers: Reasons for moving house


6% Retirement6%

Good investment6%


15%

Previous home too large

8%Previous home too small

12%


14%

To be nearer relatives

10%


4%

End of rental period

2%

Other reasons10%

Health reasons1%


circumstances6%

Sample Size: 669 (maximum of two answers per questionnaire) General Picture: The single largest reason for owner occupiers moving in Hampshire is being

able to afford a better home, at 15%, very closely followed by being able to live in a more attractive area, at 14%.

Key findings for districts: The most noticeable feature of the district data was that 23% (10) of

Winchester respondents gave the reason for moving as ‘job related’, in comparison to the Hampshire average of 6%

‘retirement’ comprised 19% of moves in Gosport, followed by New Forest at 14%. At the other extreme, it accounted for none of the moves in Rushmoor, Hart or Portsmouth.

Caution must be given to some aspects of the data due to a poor response rate for owner occupiers in some districts.


22

4.3 Private Renters Figure 4.14 Private Renters: House type

Flat35%

Terraced 22%

Semi detached23%

Detached20%

Sheltered housing 1%

Sample size: 215 (Due to the small sample, only data at county level is considered reliable. Figures are rounded so may not equal 100%) General Picture: In Hampshire, the largest proportion of private renters moved into flats, at

35% There was a fairly equal distribution of renters into detached, semi-

detached and terraced housing (20-23%) Only 1% of private renters moved into sheltered housing Figure 4.15 Private Renters: Household and Property Size

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%


% o

f mov

ers

(ren

ters

onl

y)

Sample Size: 228


23

General Picture: 95% of one bedroom properties were occupied by 1 or 2 person

households 96% of two bedroom properties were occupied by up to 3 person

households 84% of three bedroom properties were occupied by households of 2-4

people 72% of four or more bedroom properties were occupied by households of 3

or more people However, 60% of one person households moved into properties with two or

more bedrooms The data shows that although household size is quite closely related to

property size for private renters, 30% of private rented households still choose a property that has more bedrooms than occupiers.

Figure 4.16 Private Renters: Previous Residence

Rest of the UK12%

Rest of the South East 2%

Greater London 3%

Adjacent counties

10%

Outside UK 10%

Outside Hampshire

37%


16%

Same District 46%

Sample size: 407 (please note that due to rounding, figures may not equal 100% in all cases) General Picture: When compared with other types of movers, a higher proportion (37%) of

private renters originate from outside Hampshire This was 10% higher than owner occupiers. The highest proportions of people moving from outside Hampshire were from the ‘Rest of the United Kingdom’ (excluding South East England), ‘adjacent countries’ and ‘outside the UK’. The analysis shows a generally similar picture to owner occupiers, but higher proportions of people moving from outside the UK at 10%, compared to 2% for owner occupiers.


24

Figure 4.17 Private Renters: Reasons for moving house

To be nearer relatives

12%


4%

End of rental period, 9%


circumstances 7%

Health reasons 1%

Other reasons17%


18%


10%

Previous home too small 14%

Previous home too large 2%

Retirement 2% Good investment

0%Able to afford a better property

3%

Sample Size: 288 (Maximum of two answers per questionnaire) General Picture: The most common reason for private renters moving was related to a new

job, at 18%. This was very closely followed by ‘other reasons’ that were not disclosed.

14% of private renters moved because their previous home was too small and 12% to be nearer relatives


25

Appendix A: Sample Questionnaire

HOME MOVERS SURVEY 2009 Under the Data Protection Act 1998 the information you provide will only be used for the purposes of this survey and will not be passed on to any other organisation. 1. (a) city, town or village where you live (b) postcode of this property 2. Age of household members (in years; babies under one year old indicate 0)

males females 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5

3. Place where you previously lived, and the tenure of the housing

Previous Tenure Name of

town/village where you previously

lived

Owner occupied

Privately rented

Other rented

Living with family or friends

1st adult

2nd adult (if applicable)

3rd adult (if applicable)

4th adult (if applicable)

4. Which description best matches your current property? Please circle one on each row Type of Housing

Detached

Semi

detached

Terraced

Flat

Sheltered housing

Number of bedrooms

1

2

3

4

5+

Tenure

Owner

occupied

Privately rented

Rented from council/ housing

association

Provided by

employer

Shared

ownership

5. Are you the first occupier of this property? Yes No


26

6. Owner occupiers: Are you a first time buyer ? Yes No 7. Main reasons for moving (tick no more than two of the boxes)

Move related to new job To live in a more attractive area Retirement To be nearer relatives Good investment To be nearer good schools Able to afford a better property End of rental period Previous home too large Other; please specify Previous home too small 8. Please indicate the town closest to your workplace and how you travel to

work, If outside of Hampshire please state the county, e.g. Berkshire, London. If you changed workplace at, or about the time of your move, please also indicate the location of your previous place of work

Main workplace (Town/ county)

Previous workplace (if applicable)

Main mode of travel to work e.g. car, bus etc. (if/ when travelling to work)*

1st adult 2nd adult 3rd adult 4th adult * if you do not have a regular journey from home to work please indicate n/a 9. Does the property you are currently living in meet your current housing requirements? Yes No If not, what are the main reasons why not? (give a maximum of 3 reasons only) Prefer living in the countryside No, or limited, off street parking Home too small Prefer older properties Garden to small Area too noisy Do not like house type Traffic too heavy Not enough facilities close by Do not like the neighbourhood Thank you for completing the questionnaire. The information you provide will be confidential and the data emerging from the survey will only be published at an aggregate level. Stuart Roberts, Head of Spatial Strategy and Research, Environment Department, Hampshire County Council, The Castle, Winchester, Hampshire SO23 8UD Contact: Sue Clark, 01962 845890 or [email protected]



27

Appendix B: New Build completions in 2008-2009 Table 5.1 Private and RSL dwelling completions by property type and size (bed-type) in 2008-2009

1-bed 2-bed 3-bed 4-bed 5-bed 1-bed 2-bed 3-bed 4-bed 5+-bedBasingstoke &

Deane 312 312 3 36 0 8 195 327 175 10 11 1389 (39%)Hart 18 13 1 0 0 0 3 12 7 5 0 59 (0%)

Rushmoor 138 139 1 0 0 0 26 25 11 1 0 341 (45%)Test Valley 58 32 8 0 0 2 22 36 33 10 12 213 (14%)Winchester 65 103 10 0 0 4 82 67 50 14 16 411 (11%)

East Hampshire 76 172 5 0 0 14 93 166 72 21 9 628 (37%)

New Forest 88 106 3 1 0 14 90 192 81 15 6 596 (29%)Southampton 577 397 9 2 1 5 34 77 31 1 3 1137 (23%)

Eastleigh 91 222 0 0 0 1 88 159 70 13 2 646 (39%)Fareham 55 131 1 0 0 0 20 79 46 13 3 348 (28%)Gosport 77 101 1 0 0 1 8 14 3 0 1 206 (47%)

Portsmouth 463 761 14 2 0 6 57 67 10 9 5 1394 (35%)Havant 103 110 0 0 0 0 13 30 12 2 0 270 (27%)TOTAL (% RSL)

2121 (35%)

2599 (40%)

56 (9%)

41 (0%)

1 (0%)

55 (20%)

731 (36%)

1251 (28%)

601 (7%)

114 (0%)

68 (1%)

7638 (32%)

TOTAL

(% RSL)

FLAT HOUSE

other*

* = tied dwellings, HMOs, granny annexes, agricultural dwellings


28

Appendix C: Hampshire’s districts, towns and surrounding counties


29

Appendix D: Data Tables* Table 6.1 All Properties – Tenure of movers

Tenure

Owner occupied

Privately rented

Provided by

employer

Rented from council/housing

association Shared

ownership Total

Basingstoke & Deane

59 (63%) 14 (15%) 1 (1%) 13 (14%) 7 (7%) 94

East Hampshire 82 (67%) 25 (20%) 1 (1%) 14 (11%) 1 (1%) 123 Eastleigh 43 (65%) 15 (23%) 0 (0%) 6 (9%) 2 (3%) 66 Fareham 39 (65%) 17 (28%) 1 (2%) 2 (3%) 1 (2%) 60 Gosport 14 (38%) 12 (32%) 0 (0%) 10 (27%) 1 (3%) 37 Hart 27 (54%) 19 (38%) 1 (2%) 2 (4%) 1 (2%) 50 Havant 21 (40%) 9 (17%) 0 (0%) 23 (43%) 0 (0%) 53 New Forest 56 (63%) 20 (22%) 0 (0%) 11 (12%) 2 (2%) 89 Portsmouth 21 (32%) 30 (46%) 0 (0%) 13 (20%) 1 (2%) 65 Rushmoor 22 (54%) 9 (22%) 1 (2%) 8 (20%) 1 (2%) 41 Southampton 22 (28%) 26 (33%) 1 (1%) 28 (36%) 1 (1%) 78 Test Valley 35 (56%) 10 (16%) 0 (0%) 16 (26%) 1 (2%) 62

Dis

tric

t of n

ew a

bode

Winchester 29 (45%) 25 (39%) 0 (0%) 8 (13%) 2 (3%) 64 Total (Hampshire) 470 (53%) 231 (26%) 6 (1%) 154 (17%) 21 (2%) 882

*Please note that due to rounding, figures may not equal 100% in all cases


30

Table 6.2 All properties – House type of movers

House Type Detached Semi

detached Terraced Flat Sheltered housing

Total

Basingstoke & Deane

30 (34%) 25 (28%) 18 (20%) 14 (16%) 1 (1%) 88


Dis

tric

t of n

ew a

bode



31

Table 6.3: Size of Property (All tenures)

Number of bedrooms

One Bedroom Two Bedrooms

Three Bedrooms

Four Bedroom

Five or more

bedrooms

Total

Basingstoke & Deane

13 (14%) 22 (23%) 39 (41%) 17 (18%) 4 (4%) 95


Dis

tric

t of n

ew a

bode



32

Table 6.4 All Properties – Household & Property Size

Number in household One

Person Household

Two Person

Household

Three Person

Household

Four Person

Household

Five or more person

Household

Total

One Bedroom 106 (70%) 42 (28%) 3 (2%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 151 Two Bedrooms 74 (28%) 128 (48%) 44 (17%) 17 (6%) 1 (0%) 264 Three Bedrooms 58 (19%) 110 (37%) 60 (20%) 58 (19%) 15 (5%) 301

Prop

erty

Si

ze

Four or More Bedrooms 18 (11%) 57 (34%) 30 (18%) 49 (29%) 16 (9%) 170 Total (average size of households for Hampshire) 256 (29%) 337 (38%) 137 (15%) 124 (14%) 32 (4%) 886


33

Table 6.5 All properties – Household & Property Size for each district (continues on the next few pages)

Number of bedrooms


No. in household One

Bedroom Two

bedrooms Three

bedrooms Four

bedrooms Five or more

bedrooms

Total

One 9 5 8 1 1 24 Two 4 14 15 10 1 44 Three 0 3 6 4 0 13 Four 0 0 7 2 2 11 Five 0 0 2 0 0 2 Six 0 0 1 0 0 1

Basingstoke & Deane

Total 13 22 39 17 4 95 One 8 16 6 1 0 31 Two 3 14 18 9 0 44 Three 0 9 9 6 0 24 Four 0 2 9 9 1 21 Five 0 0 1 2 1 4

East Hampshire


Eastleigh


Fareham

Total 6 22 23 6 2 59 One 5 6 3 1 15 Two 2 9 2 1 14 Three 0 1 2 2 5 Four 0 1 0 1 2 Six 0 0 0 1 1

Gosport

Total 7 17 7 6 37 One 2 5 0 2 0 9 Two 4 7 4 6 0 21 Three 0 4 7 2 1 14 Four 0 1 2 3 0 6 Five 0 0 0 1 1 2

Hart

Total 6 17 13 14 2 52


34

Number of bedrooms



Bedroom Two

bedrooms Three

bedrooms Four


bedrooms

Total

One 14 1 3 1 19 Two 1 10 10 2 23 Three 0 4 2 1 7 Four 0 3 1 2 6

Havant

Total 15 18 16 6 55 One 8 9 7 3 1 28 Two 9 12 11 5 1 38 Three 0 3 5 2 0 10 Four 0 2 8 2 0 12 Five 0 0 0 1 0 1 Six 0 0 0 0 1 1

New Forest

Total 17 26 31 13 3 90 One 10 1 6 2 0 19 Two 5 18 6 3 0 32 Three 0 4 2 0 1 7 Four 0 0 2 2 0 4 Five 0 0 1 0 0 1 Six 0 0 0 1 0 1

Portsmouth

Total 15 23 17 8 1 64 One 8 3 2 0 13 Two 2 4 6 2 14 Three 0 4 2 0 6 Four 0 2 1 0 3 Five 0 1 2 1 4

Rushmoor

Total 10 14 13 3 40 One 15 3 3 0 0 21 Two 5 6 5 1 0 17 Three 1 5 6 3 0 15 Four 0 2 5 6 1 14 Five 0 0 3 0 0 3 Six 0 0 1 1 0 2 Seven 0 0 0 0 1 1

Southampton


Test Valley

Total 12 10 28 13 1 64


35

Number of bedrooms



Bedroom Two

bedrooms Three

bedrooms Four


bedrooms

Total

One 11 6 6 0 0 23 Two 0 6 7 3 2 18 Three 1 1 2 1 0 5 Four 0 2 8 4 2 16 Five 0 0 1 1 1 3

Winchester

Total 12 15 24 9 5 65


36

Table 6.6.1 All Properties: Previous residence of movers

Previous Residence

Current area of residence Bas

ingsto

ke &

Dea

ne

East H

amps

hire

Eastle

igh

Fareha

m

Gospo

rt

Hart Havan

t

New Fore

st

Portsm

outh

Rushm

oor

Southa

mpton

Test V

alley

Winc

heste

r

Moved fr

om with

in the

same d

istric

t

Moved fr

om 'else

where'

in Ham

pshire

Moved fr

om outside

Hampsh

ire

All Mov

ers

Basingstoke & Deane 101 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 1 5 1 101 (62%) 14 (9%) 48 (29%) 163East Hampshire 0 101 0 0 4 4 8 5 11 6 6 0 4 101 (47%) 48 (23%) 64 (30%) 213Eastleigh 1 0 60 2 0 0 3 0 2 2 22 2 4 60 (48%) 38 (31%) 26 (21%) 124Fareham 0 0 1 43 6 0 0 0 11 0 2 0 3 43 (43%) 23 (23%) 33 (33%) 99Gosport 0 0 0 5 24 0 4 0 1 0 2 0 0 24 (45%) 12 (23%) 17 (32%) 53Hart 1 0 0 3 0 33 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 33 (38%) 6 (7%) 49 (56%) 88Havant 0 5 0 2 4 0 40 0 16 2 1 1 0 40 (44%) 31 (34%) 19 (21%) 90New Forest 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 86 0 0 6 1 1 86 (63%) 12 (9%) 39 (28%) 137Portsmouth 0 2 1 4 1 0 10 2 61 0 1 0 1 61 (59%) 22 (21%) 21 (20%) 104Rushmoor 1 1 0 0 1 9 0 0 0 30 0 1 0 30 (51%) 13 (22%) 16 (27%) 59Southampton 0 0 7 3 1 0 0 5 0 0 82 0 0 82 (60%) 16 (12%) 38 (28%) 136Test Valley 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 87 1 87 (84%) 10 (10%) 7 (7%) 104Winchester 2 1 6 9 2 1 6 0 3 1 4 5 42 42 (37%) 40 (35%) 31 (27%) 113Total 108 112 83 72 43 48 71 99 105 46 129 102 57 790 (53%) 285 (19%) 408 (28%) 1483


37

Table 6.6.2 All Properties: Previous residence of movers (continued): origin of movers from outside Hampshire

Previous residence outside Hampshire

Current area of residence Adja

cent

coun

ties

Greater

Lond

on

Outside

UK

Rest o

f the S

outh

East

Rest o

f the U

K

Total

move

s fro

m

outside H

ampsh

ire

Moved fr

om with

in the

same d

istric

t

Moved f

rom

'else

where' in

Hampsh

ire

All Move

rs

Basingstoke & Deane 17 11 2 2 16 48 (29%) 101 (62%) 14 (9%) 163East Hampshire 25 6 5 1 27 64 (30%) 101 (47%) 48 (23%) 213Eastleigh 3 4 4 0 15 26 (21%) 60 (48%) 38 (31%) 124Fareham 14 0 3 6 10 33 (33%) 43 (43%) 23 (23%) 99Gosport 3 2 4 0 8 17 (32%) 24 (45%) 12 (23%) 53Hart 16 6 14 0 13 49 (56%) 33 (38%) 6 (7%) 88Havant 4 5 6 0 4 19 (21%) 40 (44%) 31 (34%) 90New Forest 14 0 4 4 17 39 (28%) 86 (63%) 12 (9%) 137Portsmouth 1 6 3 4 7 21 (20%) 61 (59%) 22 (21%) 104Rushmoor 15 0 0 0 1 16 (27%) 30 (51%) 13 (22%) 59Southampton 13 6 8 3 8 38 (28%) 82 (60%) 16 (12%) 136Test Valley 2 0 2 2 1 7 (7%) 87 (84%) 10 (10%) 104Winchester 8 4 5 2 12 31 (27%) 42 (37%) 40 (35%) 113Total 135 50 60 24 139 408 (28%) 790 (53%) 285 (19%) 1483


38

Table 6.7 All Properties – Reasons for moving

All main reasons for moving

Current Residence Move r

elated

to ne

w job

Retirem

ent

Good i

nves

tmen

t

Able to

affor

d a be

tter p

ropert

y

Previou

s hom

e too

large

Previou

s hom

e too

small

To live

in a

more at

tracti

ve ar

ea

To be n

earer

relat

ives

To be n

earer

good

scho

ols

End of

renta

l peri

od

Other c

hang

e in p

erson

al

circu

mstanc

es

Health

reas

ons

Other

All Move

rs

Basingstoke & Deane14 4 6 15 3 20 20 13 2 5 6 1 24 133

East Hampshire 10 8 5 24 11 19 21 25 4 9 13 4 19 172Eastleigh 8 9 3 12 6 13 15 10 2 4 5 0 15 102Fareham 10 5 2 8 4 10 9 14 5 4 5 0 6 82Gosport 8 7 1 2 3 3 4 7 0 2 1 0 13 51Hart 17 0 2 6 2 13 5 11 2 3 3 1 4 69Havant 4 14 5 5 2 3 10 12 0 0 3 2 14 74New Forest 3 13 6 8 9 17 15 20 3 2 6 1 13 116Portsmouth 6 2 2 7 4 17 10 6 4 2 3 3 17 83Rushmoor 4 1 4 9 1 7 5 4 4 2 7 1 4 53Southampton 7 1 2 4 6 18 10 4 2 4 6 4 26 94Test Valley 2 3 1 9 13 16 10 6 4 5 5 1 9 84Winchester 16 3 2 3 7 8 6 8 5 8 7 1 13 87Hampshire 109 70 41 112 71 164 140 140 37 50 70 19 177 1200


39

Table 6.8.1 All Properties: Where adult movers live and work

Place of employment

Current Residence Bas

ingstoke

& D

eane

East H

ampsh

ire

Eastle

igh

Fareham

Gosport

Hart Havan

t

New Fores

t

Portsmouth

Rushmoor

Southampton

Test V

alley

Winches

ter

Home*

Movers

that liv

e & w

ork

within th

e sam

e dist

rict*

Movers

that work

elsew

here in

Ham

pshire

Movers

that work

outside H

ampsh

ire

Total

Basingstoke & Deane 69 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 1 3 2 1 2 2 71 (59%) 15 (13%) 34 (28%) 120East Hampshire 1 48 2 3 1 4 4 0 11 1 0 0 8 2 50 (36%) 35 (26%) 52 (38%) 137Eastleigh 2 0 26 3 0 1 0 0 4 0 21 2 14 1 27 (34%) 47 (59%) 6 (8%) 80Fareham 0 1 1 22 5 0 2 0 10 1 7 0 7 2 24 (38%) 34 (54%) 5 (8%) 63Gosport 0 0 2 6 14 0 1 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 14 (45%) 15 (48%) 2 (6%) 31Hart 6 2 0 2 0 12 0 0 0 7 0 0 1 0 12 (18%) 18 (27%) 36 (55%) 66Havant 0 1 1 3 1 0 12 1 14 0 1 0 4 1 13 (30%) 26 (59%) 5 (11%) 44New Forest 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 35 1 1 12 1 0 1 36 (50%) 19 (26%) 17 (24%) 72Portsmouth 0 1 1 6 1 0 9 0 45 0 0 0 1 0 45 (64%) 19 (27%) 6 (9%) 70Rushmoor 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 14 1 0 0 1 15 (33%) 7 (16%) 23 (51%) 45Southampton 2 0 3 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 80 2 1 1 81 (84%) 13 (13%) 3 (3%) 97Test Valley 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 8 37 4 0 37 (58%) 19 (30%) 8 (13%) 64Winchester 6 1 4 3 0 0 5 1 3 0 3 4 38 0 38 (50%) 30 (39%) 8 (11%) 76Hampshire 89 55 46 52 22 27 33 41 94 27 136 47 80 11 463 (48%) 297 (31%) 205 (21%) 965


40

Table 6.8.2 Where adult movers live and work (Continued): focusing on places of employment outside Hampshire

Place of employment

Current Residence Adjac

ent c

ounties

Greater

London

Outside U

K

Rest o

f the S

outh East

Rest o

f the U

K

Movers

that work

outside H

ampsh

ire

Movers

that

live &

work

within th

e sam

e dist

rict*

Movers

that work

elsew

here in

Ham

pshire

Total

Basingstoke & Deane 23 8 0 0 3 34 (28%) 71 (59%) 15 (13%) 120East Hampshire 35 13 0 2 2 52 (38%) 50 (36%) 35 (26%) 137Eastleigh 1 2 1 1 1 6 (8%) 27 (34%) 47 (59%) 80Fareham 3 2 0 0 0 5 (8%) 24 (38%) 34 (54%) 63Gosport 0 0 1 0 1 2 (6%) 14 (45%) 15 (48%) 31Hart 28 8 0 0 0 36 (55%) 12 (18%) 18 (27%) 66Havant 1 3 1 0 0 5 (11%) 13 (30%) 26 (59%) 44New Forest 12 4 1 0 0 17 (24%) 36 (50%) 19 (26%) 72Portsmouth 4 2 0 0 0 6 (9%) 45 (64%) 19 (27%) 70Rushmoor 19 4 0 0 0 23 (51%) 15 (33%) 7 (16%) 45Southampton 1 0 1 0 1 3 (3%) 81 (84%) 13 (13%) 97Test Valley 5 1 1 0 1 8 (13%) 37 (58%) 19 (30%) 64Winchester 1 6 1 0 0 8 (11%) 38 (50%) 30 (39%) 76Hampshire 133 53 7 3 9 205 (21%) 463 (48%) 297 (31%) 965


41

Table 6.9 All properties – Satisfaction with property Question Response Does the property meet current aspirations?

Yes No

Hampshire 719 (82.5%) 152 (17.5%) Table 6.9.1 Reasons why the property does not meet the current aspirations: Reasons given: Frequency Area too noisy 21 (7%) Do not like house type 31 (11%) Do not like the neighbourhood 24 (8%) Garden to small 31 (11%) Home too small 70 (24%) No, or limited, off street parking 31 (11%) Not enough facilities close by 25 (9%) Prefer living in the countryside 31 (11%) Prefer older properties 7 (2%) Traffic too heavy 16 (6%) Total reasons 287

Table 6.10 Owner Occupiers that are first time buyers Question Response Are you a first time buyer? Yes No Hampshire 72 (15.8%) 383 (84.2%)


42

Table 6.11 Owner Occupiers – House type

Type of Housing (owner occupier)

Detached Semi

detached Terraced Flat Sheltered Housing Total

Basingstoke & Deane 24 (44%) 15 (28%) 11 (20%) 4 (7%) 0 54

East Hampshire 36 (46%) 15 (19%) 18 (23%) 10 (13%) 0 79

Eastleigh 16 (42%) 6 (16%) 10 (26%) 6 (16%) 0 38

Fareham 11 (32%) 15 (44%) 4 (12%) 2 (6%) 2 (6%) 34

Gosport 3 (21%) 4 (29%) 4 (29%) 3 (21%) 0 14 Hart 13 (48%) 8 (30%) 2 (7%) 4 (15%) 0 27

Havant 8 (42%) 7 (37%) 4 (21%) 0 (37%) 0 19 New Forest 33 (62%) 7 (13%) 3 (6%) 9 (17%) 1 (2%) 53

Portsmouth 3 (16%) 4 (21%) 8 (42%) 4 (21%) 0 19

Rushmoor 1 (5%) 8 (38%) 7 (33%) 5 (24%) 0 21

Southampton 1 (5%) 12 (57%) 4 (19%) 4 (19%) 0 21

Test Valley 12 (39%) 8 (26%) 9 (29%) 1 (3%) 1 (3%) 31

Dis

tric

t of n

ew a

bode

Winchester 13 (48%) 5 (19%) 6 (22%) 3 (11%) 0 27 Total 174 (40%) 114 (26%) 90 (21%) 55 (13%) 4 (1%) 437


43

Table 6.12 Owner Occupiers – Size of Property (number of bedrooms)

Number of bedrooms One

Bedroom Two

Bedroom Three Bedroom Four Bedroom

Five or more

bedrooms

Total

Basingstoke & Deane

7 (12%) 9 (15%) 29 (49%) 11 (19%) 3 (5%) 59

East Hampshire

4 (5%) 18 (22%) 37 (45%) 21 (26%) 2 (2%) 82

Eastleigh 2 (5%) 13 (30%) 18 (42%) 8 (19%) 2 (5%) 43 Fareham 3 (8%) 12 (32%) 17 (45%) 4 (11%) 2 (5%) 38 Gosport 1 (7%) 7 (50%) 4 (29%) 2 (14%) 0 14 Hart 0 8 (30%) 8 (30%) 10 (37%) 1 (4%) 27 Havant 0 7 (33%) 11 (52%) 3 (14%) 0 21 New Forest 5 (9%) 13 (23%) 23 (41%) 13 (23%) 2 (4%) 56 Portsmouth 1 (5%) 5 (24%) 10 (48%) 5 (24%) 0 21 Rushmoor 1 (5%) 9 (43%) 9 (43%) 2 (10%) 0 21 Southampton 1 (5%) 4 (18%) 15 (68%) 2 (9%) 0 22 Test Valley 2 (6%) 5 (14%) 19 (54%) 8 (23%) 1 (3%) 35

Dis

tric

t of n

ew a

bode



44

Table 6.13 Owner Occupiers – Household and property size (Hampshire)

Number in household

Current number of bedrooms One

perso

n

House

hold

Two pers

on

hous

ehold

Three p

erson

hous

ehold

Four p

erson

hous

ehold

More th

an fiv

e

perso

n

hous

ehold

Total

Prop

erty

Siz

e One bedroom 18 (64%) 9 (32%) 1 (4%) 0 0 28

Two bedrooms 38 (33%) 59 (51%) 11 (9%) 8 (7%) 0 116

Three bedrooms 48 (23%) 90 (42%) 36 (17%) 35 (16%) 4 (2%) 213Four or more bedrooms 10 (9%) 45 (41%) 17 (15%) 32 (29%) 7 (6%) 111

114 203 65 75 11 468

Prop

erty

Siz

e

Total


45

Table 6.14 Owner Occupiers – Household and property size (districts)

Number of bedrooms District of

new abode No in

Household One Bedroom

Two bedrooms

Three bedrooms

Four bedrooms

Five or more

bedrooms

Total

One 4 2 8 0 1 15 Two 3 6 10 7 1 27 Three 0 1 6 3 0 10 Four 0 0 4 1 1 6 Five 0 0 1 0 0 1

Basingstoke & Deane


East Hampshire

Total 4 18 37 21 2 82 One 0 2 3 0 1 6 Two 2 9 8 4 0 23 Three 0 1 2 1 0 4 Four 0 1 5 3 1 10

Eastleigh


Fareham

Total 3 12 17 4 2 38 One 1 3 2 0 6 Two 0 4 2 1 7 Three 0 0 0 1 1

Gosport

Total 1 7 4 2 14 One 3 0 2 0 5 Two 3 4 4 0 11 Three 1 4 2 1 8 Four 1 0 2 0 3

Hart

Total 8 8 10 1 27 One 0 3 0 3 Two 5 8 2 15 Three 1 0 0 1 Four 1 0 1 2

Havant

Total 7 11 3 21


46

Number of bedrooms


No in Household One

Bedroom Two

bedrooms Three

bedrooms Four

bedrooms

Five or more

bedrooms

Total

One 3 4 7 3 0 17 Two 2 7 9 5 1 24 Three 0 2 2 2 0 6 Four 0 0 5 2 0 7 Five 0 0 0 1 0 1 Six 0 0 0 0 1 1

New Forest

Total 5 13 23 13 2 56 One 1 1 2 1 5 Two 0 4 5 2 11 Three 0 0 1 0 1 Four 0 0 2 2 4

Portsmouth

Total 1 5 10 5 21 One 1 3 2 0 6 Two 0 2 6 2 10 Three 0 3 0 0 3 Four 0 1 1 0 2

Rushmoor

Total 1 9 9 2 21 One 1 1 2 0 4 Two 0 1 5 0 6 Three 0 0 5 1 6 Four 0 2 2 1 5 Five 0 0 1 0 1

Southampton

Total 1 4 15 2 22 One 1 2 4 0 0 7 Two 0 3 9 2 0 14 Three 1 0 3 2 0 6 Four 0 0 2 4 1 7 Five 0 0 1 0 0 1

Test Valley


Winchester

Total 1 6 13 5 4 29


47

Table 6.15.1 Owner Occupier – Previous residence of movers

Previous Residence

Current area of residence Bas

ingsto

ke &

Dea

ne

East H

amps

hire

Eastle

ighFare

ham

Gospo

rtHart

Havan

tNew

Forest

Portsm

outh

Rushm

oor

Southa

mpton

Test V

alley

Winc

heste

r

Moved fr

om with

in

same d

istric

t Move

d from 'e

lsewhere

'

in Ham

pshire

Moved fr

om outside

Hampsh

ire

Total

Basingstoke & Deane 59 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 3 1 59 (58%) 10 (10%) 32 (32%) 101East Hampshire 0 65 0 0 2 4 5 5 9 4 6 0 3 65 (45%) 38 (26%) 43 (29%) 146

Eastleigh 0 0 43 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 18 2 3 43 (53%) 26 (32%) 12 (15%) 81Fareham 0 0 1 29 6 0 0 0 9 0 2 0 0 29 (45%) 18 (28%) 18 (28%) 65Gosport 0 0 0 3 10 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 10 (45%) 6 (27%) 6 (27%) 22

Hart 0 0 0 3 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 (36%) 3 (6%) 27 (57%) 47Havant 0 5 0 2 2 0 7 0 9 2 1 1 0 7 (19%) 22 (59%) 8 (22%) 37

New Forest 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 58 0 0 3 1 1 58 (65%) 6 (7%) 25 (28%) 89Portsmouth 0 2 0 0 0 0 6 0 24 0 1 0 0 24 (67%) 9 (25%) 3 (8%) 36Rushmoor 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 12 0 1 0 12 (38%) 8 (25%) 12 (38%) 32

Southampton 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 3 0 0 18 0 0 18 (46%) 8 (21%) 13 (33%) 39Test Valley 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 51 0 51 (81%) 9 (14%) 3 (5%) 63Winchester 1 0 5 5 2 1 4 0 0 0 3 2 14 14 (29%) 23 (47%) 12 (24%) 49

Total 60 74 60 45 24 28 24 66 51 22 56 61 22 407 (50%) 186 (23%) 214 (27%) 807


48

Table 6.15.2 Owner Occupied – (continued) Origins of movers from outside Hampshire

Current area of residence Adjac

ent c

ounties

Greater

London

Rest o

f the S

outh East

Rest o

f the U

K

Outside U

K

Moved fr

om outside

Hampsh

ire

Moved fr

om with

in

same d

istric

t

Moved fr

om

'else

where' in

Hampsh

ire

Total

Basingstoke & Deane 16 6 0 9 1 32 (32%) 59 (58%) 10 (10%) 101East Hampshire 19 6 1 13 4 43 (29%) 65 (45%) 38 (26%) 146

Eastleigh 1 2 0 9 0 12 (15%) 43 (53%) 26 (32%) 81Fareham 7 0 3 5 3 18 (28%) 29 (45%) 18 (28%) 65Gosport 0 0 0 6 0 6 (27%) 10 (45%) 6 (27%) 22

Hart 10 6 0 8 3 27 (57%) 17 (36%) 3 (6%) 47Havant 0 5 0 1 2 8 (22%) 7 (19%) 22 (59%) 37

New Forest 10 0 4 11 0 25 (28%) 58 (65%) 6 (7%) 89Portsmouth 0 2 0 1 0 3 (8%) 24 (67%) 9 (25%) 36Rushmoor 11 0 0 1 0 12 (38%) 12 (38%) 8 (25%) 32

Southampton 8 1 1 2 1 13 (33%) 18 (46%) 8 (21%) 39Test Valley 0 0 2 1 0 3 (5%) 51 (81%) 9 (14%) 63Winchester 3 1 0 6 2 12 (24%) 14 (29%) 23 (47%) 49

Total 85 29 11 73 16 214 (27%) 407 (50%) 186 (23%) 807


49

Table 6.16 Owner Occupiers – Reasons for moving

Reasons for moving

Current Residence Move re

lated

to new

job

Retirem

ent

Good in

vestm

ent

Able to affo

rd a b

etter

propert

y

Previous

home too

larg

e

Previous h

ome too

small

To live i

n a more

attracti

ve ar

ea

To be nea

rer re

latives

To be n

earer

good

schoo

ls

End of ren

tal pe

riod

Other c

hange

in

persona

l circ

umstance

s

Health

reas

ons

Other rea

sons

Total

Dis

tric

t of n

ew a

bode

Basingstoke & Deane 6 3 4 14 3 14 16 7 1 1 3 0 14 86East

Hampshire 5 7 5 23 9 13 18 15 3 7 8 2 8 123

Eastleigh 2 6 3 11 4 9 12 5 1 0 4 0 9 66

Fareham 3 3 2 6 4 5 6 10 5 2 4 0 4 54

Gosport 2 4 1 1 3 1 1 3 0 0 1 0 4 21Hart 6 0 2 4 2 6 5 6 1 1 2 1 1 37

Havant 2 4 5 4 1 0 6 4 0 0 1 0 4 31

New Forest 2 10 6 8 6 10 11 8 2 0 3 1 7 74

Portsmouth 0 0 1 6 3 7 4 0 2 0 0 0 6 29Rushmoor 2 0 4 7 1 2 3 3 3 0 6 0 1 32

Southampton 1 1 2 3 3 3 2 2 0 1 2 0 5 25

Test Valley 2 2 1 6 10 8 6 3 2 1 2 0 4 47Winchester 10 3 1 3 7 4 2 4 4 1 2 0 3 44

43 43 37 96 56 82 92 70 24 14 38 4 70 669

Dis

tric

t of n

ew a

bode

Total


50

Table 6.17.1 Owner Occupiers - Where adult movers live and work

Place of employment

Current Residence Bas

ingsto

ke &

Dea

ne

East H

amps

hire

Eastle

igh

Fareha

m

Gospo

rt

HartHav

ant

New Fore

st

Portsm

outh

Rushm

oor

Southa

mpton

Test V

alley

Winche

ster

Home

Movers

that

live an

d work

within

the sa

me dist

rict*

Movers

that

work el

sewhe

re

in Ham

pshir

e

Movers

that

work ou

tside

Hamps

hire

Total

Basingstoke & Deane

39 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 2 2 0 1 1 40 10 25 75

East Hampshire 1 34 1 2 1 4 4 0 7 0 0 0 3 1 35 23 38 96

Eastleigh 1 0 17 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 16 1 9 1 18 32 6 56Fareham 0 1 1 12 3 0 1 0 8 0 6 0 5 1 13 25 3 41Gosport 0 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 2 11

Hart 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 6 23 32Havant 0 0 1 3 0 0 3 1 12 0 1 0 3 1 4 21 2 27

New Forest 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 22 1 1 9 1 0 1 23 15 11 49Portsmouth 0 1 1 3 1 0 5 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 14 11 3 28Rushmoor 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 10 4 13 27

Southampton 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 22 0 0 0 22 7 1 30Test Valley 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 8 17 3 0 17 17 6 40Winchester 2 1 1 3 0 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 13 0 13 14 4 31

Total 48 38 29 29 9 15 17 27 50 15 67 19 37 6 216 (40%) 190 (35%) 137 (25%) 543


51

Table 6.17.2 Owner Occupiers - Where adult movers live and work (continued): Place of employment outside Hampshire

Place of employment

Current Residence

Greater

Lond

on

Adjace

nt co

untie

s

Rest o

f the S

outh

East

Rest o

f the U

K

Outside

UK

Movers

that

live an

d work

within

the sa

me dist

rict*

Movers

that

work el

sewhe

re

in Ham

pshir

e

Movers

that

work ou

tside

Hamps

hire

Total

Basingstoke & Deane 5 17 0 3 0 40 10 25 75

East Hampshire 10 25 2 1 0 35 23 38 96

Eastleigh 2 1 1 1 1 18 32 6 56Fareham 1 2 0 0 0 13 25 3 41Gosport 0 0 0 1 1 4 5 2 11

Hart 5 18 0 0 0 3 6 23 32Havant 2 0 0 0 0 4 21 2 27

New Forest 3 7 0 0 1 23 15 11 49Portsmouth 1 2 0 0 0 14 11 3 28Rushmoor 3 10 0 0 0 10 4 13 27

Southampton 0 0 0 0 1 22 7 1 30Test Valley 1 4 0 1 0 17 17 6 40Winchester 2 1 0 0 1 13 14 4 31

Total 35 87 3 7 5 216 (40%) 190 (35%) 137 (25%) 543


52

Table 6.18 Private Renters: House Types

House Type

Detached Semi detached

Terraced Sheltered housing

Flat All

types

Private Renters 43 (20%) 47 (22%) 48 (22%) 1 (1%) 76 (35%) 215

Table 6.19 Private Renters: Household and Property Size

One Person

Household

Two Person

Household

Three Person

Household

Four Person

Household

Five or More Person

Household One Bedroom 20 (48%) 20 (48%) 2 (5%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 42

Two Bedrooms 21 (25%) 42 (51%) 17 (20%) 2 (2%) 1 (1%) 83

Three Bedrooms 7 (12%) 17 (28%) 16 (27%) 16 (27%) 4 (7%) 60

Four or More Bedrooms 2 (5%) 10 (23%) 12 (28%) 15 (35%) 4 (9%) 4350 (22%) 89 (39%) 47 (21%) 33 (14%) 9 (4%) 228

Total

Total

Number in household

Prop

erty

Siz

e

Table 6.20 Private Renters: Previous Residence

Previous Residence Previous Residence Outside Hampshire

Same District

Elsewhere in

Hampshire

Outside Hampshire

Adjacent counties

Rest of the

South East

Rest of the UK

Outside UK

Greater London

All Private Renters

Private Renters

189 (46%)

66 (16%)

152 (37%)

39 (10%)

9 (2%)

49 (12%)

41 (10%)

14 (3%) 407


53

Figure 6.21 Private Renters: Reasons for Moving

Reasons for Moving

No. of Private Renters

% of Private Renters

Move related to new job 53 18%

Retirement 6 2% Good

investment 1 0%


10 3%

Previous home too

large 6 2%

Previous home too

small 41 14%

To live in a more

attractive area 29 10%

To be nearer relatives 34 12%

To be nearer good schools 11 4%

End of rental period 25 9%


circumstances 20 7%

Health reasons 2 1%

Other reasons 50 17%

All Private Renters 288

home movers survey report - hampshire · hampshire, portsmouth and southampton home movers survey...

Documents