hong kong budget 2006 - 2007 econ 100 introduction to economics section 3 group 2
TRANSCRIPT
Hong Kong Hong Kong Budget Budget
2006 - 20072006 - 2007
Econ 100 Introduction to EconomicsSection 3 Group 2
Group membersGroup members
Lam Ah Kuen 053037 Lam Ah Kuen 053037
Chau Yik Cheung 053035Chau Yik Cheung 053035
Tai Chi Fai 053042Tai Chi Fai 053042
Chan Sin Yu 053072Chan Sin Yu 053072
Cheung Mei Lin 053061Cheung Mei Lin 053061
Mak Tin Lok Mak Tin Lok 055108 055108
Economic Performance Economic Performance GDP registered a growth of GDP registered a growth of 7.3 %7.3 % in 2005 in 2005
(8)(6)(4)(2)02468
1012141618
19
62
19
65
19
68
19
71
19
74
19
77
19
80
19
83
19
86
19
89
19
92
19
95
19
98
20
01
20
04
Year
Gro
wth
rat
e %
Growth rate in HK (1962-2005)
the unemployment rate fell from 8.6 % in the unemployment rate fell from 8.6 % in mid-2003 to a four-year low of mid-2003 to a four-year low of 5.2 %.5.2 %.
Unemployment rate in HK(1977-2005)
00.5
11.5
22.5
33.5
44.5
55.5
66.5
77.5
88.5
Year
Unem
plo
yment
rate
(%
)
Government's CommitmentGovernment's CommitmentEstimates of expenditure:Estimates of expenditure: total government total government expenditure for 2006–07 will be expenditure for 2006–07 will be $245.6 billion$245.6 billion. .
Expenditure
32%
20%18%
14%
16%Education
Social Welfare
Health
Security
Infrastructure
Funding to help disadvantaged groups would be Funding to help disadvantaged groups would be increased the recurrent by about increased the recurrent by about $100 million$100 million..
Funding for disadvantaged groups
HK$20 Million HK$27 Million
HK$30 Million
HK$20 Million
rehabilitation service
family support
home care services
Comprehensive ChildDevelopment Service
Funding for people who are capable ofworking
HK$60 Million
HK$20 MillionHK$150Million
the IntensiveEmploymentAssistance Projects
employmentassistance measures
district-based povertyalleviation work
•An additional funding of about $230 million to strengthen efforts to assist those in need who are capable of working .
Why Practicing Goods and Why Practicing Goods and Services Tax Tax ?? ??
The Reasons are…The Reasons are…
Our existing public finances’ expenditure is Our existing public finances’ expenditure is rigid and revenue is unstablerigid and revenue is unstableImportant revenue items: Land premiums Important revenue items: Land premiums and investment income are volatileand investment income are volatileThe problems of narrow tax baseThe problems of narrow tax baseThe Government need revenue items to The Government need revenue items to offset the volatility of the othersoffset the volatility of the others
How the Government working out the details of GST
Follow the principle of maintaining low and Follow the principle of maintaining low and simple tax regimesimple tax regime
Provide tax refunds to visitors and allow Provide tax refunds to visitors and allow importers importers
Propose relief and compensatory measures Propose relief and compensatory measures
Reduction of other taxes, Reduction of other taxes,
The timetable for practicing GST
A public consultation will be launched in A public consultation will be launched in the middle of this year the middle of this year
It will last about nine months It will last about nine months
A report will be preparedA report will be prepared
the proposals will be submitted for the proposals will be submitted for consideration by the Government of the consideration by the Government of the next termnext term
CountryCountry AustraliaAustralia SingaporeSingapore CanadaCanada
Started Year of TaxStarted Year of Tax 20002000 19941994 19911991
Tax RateTax Rate 10%10% 5%5% 7%7%
Any Refunds toAny Refunds toTravelersTravelers
YesYes YesYes YesYes
Economic Economic ConditionCondition
The old sales tax The old sales tax is unfair, outdated, is unfair, outdated, ineffective, ineffective, complex, penalize complex, penalize exports and exports and discourage discourage investment.investment.
High sales in 1993 High sales in 1993 and the first quarter and the first quarter 1994.1994.
But a dramatic But a dramatic drop 9% in April, drop 9% in April, 1994.1994.
The economy had The economy had got a high budget got a high budget deficit for few years.deficit for few years.
GST Revenue GST Revenue (Year-on-year % (Year-on-year % change)change)
Keep a positive Keep a positive increase*increase*
Keep a positive Keep a positive increase*increase*
Keep a positive Keep a positive increase*increase*
The information of GST of the countries: Australia, The information of GST of the countries: Australia, Singapore and CanadaSingapore and Canada
The Changes in GST Revenue of Australia
31257
2738923854
15644
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
1998 - 99 1999 - 00 2000 - 01 2001 - 02 2002 - 03 2003 - 04
Year
$ m
illio
n
The Changes in GST Revenue of Singapore
2165
2957
3470
2134212119951657
0500
1000150020002500300035004000
1997 - 98 1998 - 99 1999 - 00 2000 - 01 2001 - 02 2002 - 03 2003 - 04 2004 - 05
Year
$ m
illio
n
The Changes in GST Revenue of Canada
29758
2490928248 2828624990
227902068419461
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
1996 -97
1997-98
1998-99
1999 -00
2000 -01
2001 -02
2002 -03
2003 -04
2004 -05
Year
$ m
illio
n
DisadvantagesDisadvantages
1. Sales Tax is an indirect tax (Regressive Tax System).
2. It contrary to the law of equity and the resources allocation.
3. Difficulties in the implementation.
4. No trading relationship between the government and the tax payerNo commitment
5. Although tax base is widening, the procedures is more complexHigher administrative cost. Higher administrative cost in controlling the tax escapers and the legal trading activities.
Disadvantages (Cont’d)Disadvantages (Cont’d)
6. Decrease the customers’ shopping desiresdamage to the image of ”Shopping Paradise”. Hong Kong is the freest city in the world, it will hit its reputation.
7. It is the not a good way to raise the government income since the people will not willing to shop under a bad economy.
8. Hard to introduce in the street market.
9. Shortage in accountants may appear in the initial stage.
10. Increase in expenditure to the local small companiesthey may closed.
11. Definition of the necessities, is it including newspaper and television?
12. Crowding-Out Effect.
AdvantagesAdvantages
1. Widen the tax base increase the government income
2. Based on the concept of “ Pay by Yourselves”.3. Stabilizing the government income contrary to the
negative growth rate.4. The progresses of trading involves the accounting
work enhance the accounting industry5. The local leavers should take their social
responsibilities to pay for themselves.6. According the Singapore case, the introduction of
GST brought the negative effect was short-lived.
SurveySurvey
The background of the surveyThe background of the survey(from Democratic Alliance for the Betterment)(from Democratic Alliance for the Betterment)
The Date: 27/1/06-6/2/06The Date: 27/1/06-6/2/06
The means: random in telephoneThe means: random in telephone
Target: above 18Target: above 18
The number of people: 1405The number of people: 1405
The number of questions: 13The number of questions: 13
Questions:Questions:
Do you agree imposing GST?Do you agree imposing GST?
How to use (tax cuts or others How to use (tax cuts or others government administrative fee, return the government administrative fee, return the tax collected before, increase investment tax collected before, increase investment of capital construction, increase in public of capital construction, increase in public welfare) the surplus budget from different welfare) the surplus budget from different class of income?class of income?
AnalysisAnalysis
People's view towards GST
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
2005 2006
Disagree
Agree
Family income and their Family income and their preference of imposing GST preference of imposing GST
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
Agree Disagree No Idea
%
Under $10,000$2-30,000
Above $40,000
The suggestions of how to use the The suggestions of how to use the surplus budget from different class surplus budget from different class
of incomeof income
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
Tax Cuts Return the Tax Invest more inconstruction
Increase in publicwelfare
Under $10,000
$1-20,000
Above $40,000
The endThe end
Thank you!!Thank you!!