hongyu gao, tuo huang, jun hu, jingnan wang. boyd et al. social network sites: definition, history,...

24
Hongyu Gao, Tuo Huang, Jun Hu, Jingnan Wang

Upload: reginald-martin

Post on 18-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Hongyu Gao, Tuo Huang, Jun Hu, Jingnan Wang

Boyd et al. Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11. 2007

Rapid growth of social network sites spawns a new area of network security and privacy issues

To conduct a comprehensive survey of existing and potential attack behaviors in social network sites

Identify patterns in such attack behaviors

Review existing solutions, measurement as well as defense mechanisms

Social Engineering attacks Spamming Phishing

Social Network vs. Social Network Sites (SNS) Sybil attack

Social network Account Attack Hack the social network account using password

cracking. Malware attack

Social Network sites as vectors of malware propagation

SNS as vectors for conventional spamming Messages, Wallposts, Comments, …

Detection and measurements

Active detection ---Social Honeypots Steve et al

Message spam and comment spam are similar with traditional spam.In my space there is new form of spam –deceptive profile spam.

This kind of spammer uses sexy photo and seductive story in about me section to attract visitors.

Social honeypots

Figure 1: An example of a deceptive spam profile

Social honeypots

Social honeypots can be seen as a kind of active detection of social network spam.

The author constructed 51 honeypot profiles and associated them with distinct geographic location in Myspace to collect the deceptive spam profiles.

For the num of their honeypots is small,so the dataset they collected is very limited.

Passive detection-----Detecting spammers and content promoters in online video social networks, by F.

Benevenuto, et. al. This paper is a comprehensive

behavior-based detection and it can be cataloged into passive dectection compared with “Social Honeypots”.

Passive detection

The author manually select a test collection of real YouTube users, classifying them  as spammers, promoters, and legitimates. Using this collection,they provided a characterization of social and content attributes that help distinguish each user class.They used a state-of-the-art supervised classification algorithm to detect spammers and promoters, and assess its effectiveness in their test collection.

Passive detection

They considered three attribute sets, namely, video attributes, user attributes, and social network (SN) attributes.

Passive detection

They characterize each video by its duration, numbers of views and of commentaries received, ratings, number of times the video was selected as favorite, as well as numbers of honors and of external links

Passive detection

They select the following 10 user attributes: number of friends, number of videos Uploaded, number of videos watched, number of videos added as favorite, numbers of video responses posted and received, numbers of subscriptions and subscribers, average time between video uploads, and maximum number of videos uploaded in 24 hours.

Passive detection

Social network (SN) attributes: clustering coefficient, betweenness,reciprocity, assortativity, and UserRank.

Passive detection

For it is passive detection,it need pre-knowledge and another drawback is that using supervised learning algorithm may require large dataset for learning, otherwise the result will not be accurate.

Characteristics No specific recipient Using SNS as free advertisement site Can completely undermine the service of the

website especially if launched as Sybil attacks

Detection Metrics TagSpam TagBlur DomFp NumAds ValidLink

A general form of attack to reputation systems Large amount of fake identities “outvote”

honest identities Can be used to thwart the intended purpose of

certain SNSes

Sybil Nodes have small “Quotient Cuts”

Inherent social networks do notPossible to encircle the Sybil nodes

Malware attack

The most notorious worm in social network is the koobface. According to Trend Micro, the attack from koobface as follows: Step 1: Registering a Facebook account.

Step 2:Confirming an e-mail address in Gmail to activate the registered account. Step 3: Joining random Facebook groups. Step 4: Adding “friends” and posting messages on their walls.

Malware attack

There are worms and other threats that have plagued social networking sites. E.g. Grey Goo targeting at Second Life, JS/SpaceFlash targeting at MySpace,Kut Wormer targeting at Orkut, Secret Crush targeting at Facebook, etc.

Malware attack

Until now there are few papers on detecting these attacks.

Social network Account Attack

Hack the social network account using password cracking.

-----In February,2009, the Twitter account of Miley Cyrus was hijacked too and someone posted some

offensive messages