hook, line and blinkers - snz february 2012
DESCRIPTION
Daryl Sykes reviews the book.TRANSCRIPT
12 SEAFOOD NEW ZEALAND February 2012
BookReview
This book is co-authored by Gareth Morgan and Geoff
Simmons. Their intention is clearly worthwhile but they deliver
to their readers a pop history of fishing – global and local -
underpinned and overlaid by some obvious personal preferences
and biases. Which is fine; it is after all their book.
The initial responses to the release of the Morgan/Simmons
book have been interesting to observe – selective acceptance and
both cautious and intemperate criticism from recreational fishing
commentators; and some predictably opportunist commentary by
various recreational zealots and eco-pundits who can generally be
relied upon never to let a chance go by to have a tilt at commercial
fishing and/or the QMS.
A trawl through various recreational fishing website discussion
boards reveals a large number of contributors who have not
properly read the book but who have seized on aspects of it to give
the fishing industry – and in particular the “greedy corporates” - yet
another good kicking. Which in itself perhaps reveals the truth of
the book title in regard to what some Kiwis never wanted to know.
Unfortunately all the facts which constitute the truth of fisheries
management in New Zealand are not consistently served up to
readers.
There is no doubt that serious research and investigation went
into the preparation of Hook Line and Blinkers – but for a book
that promises to tell the reader what he or she never wanted to
know but in the opinions of Morgan and Simmons still very much
needs to know, for me the book fails in one critical area. Yes it is a
good read; yes, I confirm that if you have a genuine interest in the
broader aspects of fisheries management in New Zealand then you
will learn from this book. But the failure is a crucial one in that it
embeds a widely held prejudice against the fishing industry – and
is also one I really do have trouble understanding given the profiles
and reputations of the authors and their acknowledged sources.
My initial criticism of the authors was their lightly questioned
acceptance of the proposition that the commercial fishing industry
wreaks unacceptable environmental damage. “Bottom trawling and by-
catch of marine mammals and seabirds are the best-known examples of
fishing’s negative impacts.” What is missing is any credible comparison
of the environmental performance of other food producers and any
scaling of “negative”. The inference is that the scale is no more robust
than one of public perception fostered by the eco-cults. At least they
go this far -“Squawking greenies are no help either. All food production
has some impact on the earth.”
Filleted of a summary of biology, oceanography and environment;
skinned of its brief world view and various tragedies of the commons, the
book leads the reader to two key problems that the authors see in New
Zealand fisheries - inadequate environmental safeguards on commercial
fishing, and the pathetic management of recreational fishing.
So therein lay the problems but what do Morgan and Simmons
offer as prospective solutions? Not unexpectedly given their level of
research and consideration the authors put their weight behind a quota
management system. But it is in this regard that their book and their
subsequent media presentations perpetuate the modern urban myths
that when the QMS was implemented in 1986 it solely constituted
a commercial fisheries management regime – it did not – and that it
Hook, Line and Blinkers: Everything that Kiwis never wanted to know about fi shing Published by Phantom House Books.
Daryl Sykes reviews a book, which casts a critical eye on New Zealand’s fi shing industry, among other things, and has been generating a lot of publicity since its release last year.
February 2012 SEAFOOD NEW ZEALAND 13
Maersk New Zealand Limited · �e CPO Level 3, 12 Queen Street · Auckland · New ZealandT 0800 MAERSK (623775) · F +64 9359 3488 · E [email protected]
Creating opportunitiesin Global commerce
maerskline.com
We believe that creating opportunities is the key to success – in your business and in ours.
With our complete range of cold chain solutions, our dedicated reefer specialists take care of your perishables from pick-up to delivery.And with our truly global reach, we ensure your products arrive in the best possible condition – anywhere in the world.
denied any allowance for recreational fishing – it did not. The authors
write “In the 80s we did lead the world by taking the bold step of
closing the Commons and putting commercial fishing under the Quota
Management System. Well done. ...”
Well done indeed, except that the QMS was intended (and to
some limited extent has been operated as) the New Zealand fisheries
management regime, not solely a commercial fishing management
tool. And it is in the history of the introduction of the QMS that
Morgan and Simmons fail; badly.
I quote “... industry ... got the quota for free” – we did not. ITQs
were a replacement for access and utilisation rights already owned.
Again I quote “The first oversight often raised with our QMS is that it
handed a $4 billion asset to fishers, which is now held by a small group
of large companies. This was probably the biggest swindle since the
European land grab here of the 19th century.” Not true on several
counts. There was no swindle and the social, cultural, environmental and
economic dividends to New Zealand from the QMS have been immense.
And ownership of fishing rights is not confined to a small elite.
I do not understand how Morgan and Simmons felt confident in
making these statements. An opportunity to debate and correct them
would be well received; in part because I have long held the view that
the QMS is poorly named for what it is and more poorly understood
by politicians and the wider community. And the blame for that rests
as much with the fishing industry as it does with anyone else – and for
various reasons. We have a duty to put that right.
The basics of the QMS are not difficult to explain: the fish stock
and environmental ‘management’ components of the QMS rely on
good data, good science and output controls – Total Allowable Catches
(TACs). The ‘quota’ component of the QMS is an ancillary currency of
trade and exchange, at present restricted to commercial participants
but a ‘system’ intended to cover all extractive and non-extractive
interests in fisheries. The architects and original advocates of the QMS
could/should have explained to Morgan and Simmons that the system
is a tradable rights-based regime to allow management of a natural
resource in which there were and continue to be a range of extractive
and non-extractive, and inevitably competing, interests.
Again in my view, that we have failed over 25 years to complete
that rights-based framework and along the way have silently witnessed
various politicians and bureaucrats generally ignoring the option for
rights-based resolution of competing interests justifies this comment
and challenge from the authors – “But since then (1980s) we have
rested on our laurels, and fallen behind. The world has moved
on, and this has shown up some glaring flaws in the way we fish.
Recreational fishing is still a free for all, and there are few controls on
the environmental damage caused by the commercial fishing industry.
It’s time to take off the blinkers and with that wider perspective, first
acknowledge that we are no longer doing such a great job, and then
regain our world leadership.”
Despite my own reservations about some of the authors’
explanations and analyses the book is much more than just a vanity
project for the occasionally philanthropic Morgan and is deserving firstly
of a read, and more importantly of a response. The incorrect assertions
should not go unchallenged and the challenges to the authors (and
from them) should not remain unanswered.