house ethics committee lawsuit letter 6-20-2016 final
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/25/2019 House Ethics Committee Lawsuit Letter 6-20-2016 Final
1/4
e-mail: [email protected]
House Committee on Ethics
1015 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, C !0515
Committee mem"ers:
We wish #our assistance in this matter of utmost im$ortance for the future of %merica&
isco'ering e'idence of ($atterns and $ractices( has forced we the $eo$le to come forward to redress
our claims of grie'ances, though we find we are "loc)ed at e'er# turn "# "lan)et immunit#&
*nder the ue +rocess and ust Com$ensation clauses, go'ernment agents can and shall "e sued for
unlawful ta)ings as a matter of right& o act of Congress is necessar# to gi'e it effect& .n fact, the /irst
%mendment $recludes Congress from ma)ing an# law (a"ridging( it& his is the strongest argument$ossi"le for a ight to sue go'ernment& When the go'ernment, or an# agenc# thereof, claims immunit#,
it is (Constitutional %mendment "# udicial /iat&( .t is not legal or lawful&
.t is also well )nown that #ou ha'e a'aila"le for e2amination a wet-in) signed co$# of the illustrated
affida'it of $ro"a"le cause entitled, 34ou now 6omething .s Wrong When&&&&&%n %merican %ffida'it
of +ro"a"le Cause,7 as "ac)-u$ reference and e'idence of the man# dece$ti'e and unconstitutional
acts which Congress has foisted u$on the $eo$le and states of the $er$etual *nion created under the
1889 %rticles of Confederation, which stated in %rticle ..., (%nd the %rticles of this confederation
shall "e in'iola"l# o"ser'ed "# e'er# 6tate, and the union shall "e $er$etual;( .n 'iolation of the
$er$etual *nion, the udiciar# %ct of 189< claims authorit# o'er Congress to create court s#stems&
herefore it is ull and =oid of an# and all authorit#& .n 'iolation of the $er$etual *nion the in'alid>artial laws that ha'e created >ilitar# courts within $eacetime are in'alid >ilitar# courts that are null
and 'oid without an# authorit#& 6ee E2 $arte >illigan, 81 *&6& ?@ Wall&A ! ?19A, was a *&6& 6u$reme
Court case that ruled the a$$lication of militar# tri"unals to citiens when ci'ilian courts are still
o$erating is unconstitutional&
he 11th %mendment clearl# decides the courts must "e run with due $rocess and under common law,
for as shown the (other( courts are corru$ted and ha'e no (due $rocess&( he re'ised codes of
$age 1 of @ $ages
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected] -
7/25/2019 House Ethics Committee Lawsuit Letter 6-20-2016 Final
2/4
Washington ado$ted "# the new union of 6tates, stand in conflict of the $er$etual *nion and therefore
are all null and 'oid of an# authorit#&
CW D&80& istrict and munici$al court udgesF association esta"lished& here is esta"lished in the statean association, to "e )nown as the Washington state district and munici$al court udgesF association,
mem"ershi$ in which shall include all dul# elected or a$$ointed and Gualified udges of courts of
limited urisdiction, including "ut not limited to district udges and munici$al court udges& 1a# D, 190!& he istrict of Colum"ia was re-incor$orated in
198!, and all states in the *nion were reformed as cor$orate franchises of the /ederal Cor$oration so
that a new cor$orate *nion of the *nited 6tates could "e created& he )e# to when the states "ecame/ederal /ranchises is related to the date when such states enacted the /ield Code in law& he /ield
Code, authored "# %merican law#er a'id udle# /ield .., mo'ed the courts awa# from common law
$leadings and into code $leadings& his constitutionall# re$ugnant change was ado$ted first "# ew4or), and then "# California in 198!, and shortl# afterwards the Lie"er Code was used to "ring the
*nited 6tates into the 198@ Brussels Conference, and into the Hague Con'entions of 19
-
7/25/2019 House Ethics Committee Lawsuit Letter 6-20-2016 Final
3/4
.n 1arch , 1
-
7/25/2019 House Ethics Committee Lawsuit Letter 6-20-2016 Final
4/4
ca$acit# or authorit# to remain seated in said offices&
% $anel s$onsored "# the Council on /oreign elations ?C/A wants the *nited 6tates to focus not on
the defense of our own "orders, "ut rather create what effecti'el# would "e a common "order thatincludes >e2ico and Canada& he C/, dedicated to one-world go'ernment, financed "# a num"er of
the largest ta2-e2em$t foundations, and wielding immense $ower and influence o'er our li'es in the
areas of finance, "usiness, la"or, militar#, education, and mass communication media, should "efamiliar to e'er# %merican concerned with good go'ernment to $reser'e and defend the organic
Constitution&
he C/ is an esta"lishment which has influence and $ower in )e# decision-ma)ing $ositions at the
highest le'els of go'ernment, there"# a$$l#ing $ressure from a"o'e while financing indi'iduals and
grou$s to "ring $ressure from "elow, and ustif#ing high-le'el decisions for con'erting the *nited6tates from a so'ereign constitutional re$u"lic into a ser'ile mem"er of a one-world dictatorshi$&
%merica is under attac) "# forces who wish to destro# this re$u"lic, our wa# of life, our inde$endence,
our li'es, li"ert# and freedoms& %ll mem"ers of the C/ must "e remo'ed from their seats of $u"lic
office, due to direct 'iolation of their Constitutional oaths of office& he destruction of the rights of%mericans has reached monstrous $ro$ortions and the $eo$le res$onsi"le are those sitting in $u"lic
office toda#& /reedom reGuires ci'ic dut#, and those who hold dual oaths ha'e no lawful citienshi$
and can no longer chair an# $u"lic office constitutionall#& herefore, without standing and ca$acit#under *6 citienshi$, the# must "e remo'ed& .t is the onl# lawful remed# in line with the organic
Constitution&
+lease also see 19 *&6& Code I !@! - e$ri'ation of rights under color of law and I !@1 - Cons$irac#
against rights& We the $eo$le, as the so'ereigns of this nation, ha'e Kod granted inaliena"le rights
which cannot "e gi'en or ta)en awa#& hose rights are recognied "#, not granted "#, the eclaration
of .nde$endence and the Constitution& Congress has failed its $rocedural due $rocess, where"# there isno authorit# to su"'ert for the $ur$ose of acts or statutes to esta"lish $re'ious acts and are continuousl#
made contrar# to the Constitution&
hat affirmed "# the 6u$reme Court at D08 *6 D!5 ?1