how mobile is transforming the energy and natural-resources sector utilities … · 2015-10-28 ·...
TRANSCRIPT
A report from the Economist Intelligence Unit
How mobile is transforming the energy and natural-resources sector
Utilities and the customer connection
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 20141
Utilities and the customer connection
Preface 2
Introduction 3
Utilities and the new era of demanding, mobile-empowered customers 5
Meet the new entrants eyeing utilities’ customers 7
Controlling the gateways to customers 9
Staying out in front of demand-response 9
Tapping big data 10
Conclusion: Preparing for the future 11
Appendix: survey results 12
Contents
1
2
3
4
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 20142
Utilities and the customer connection
Preface
Utilities and the customer connection is one of three reports in a series that examines how mobile technologies are transforming the energy and natural-resources sector. It explores how the revolution in consumer mobile communications is changing how utilities serve customers, encouraging them to become more responsive and engaged and to pursue strategies that make customers allies in more efficient and sustainable operations.
As the basis for this research, The Economist Intelligence Unit conducted in August 2013 a global survey of 150 energy and natural-resources executives, comprising 50 in each of the mining, utilities, and oil and gas industries. The findings and views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsor. The author was Mark Svenvold. Riva Richmond edited the report and Mike Kenny was responsible for the layout. We would like to thank all of the executives who participated, whether on record or anonymously, for their valuable insights.
Interviewees
Jesse Berst, editor of the SmartGrid News
Erich Gunther, chairman and chief technology officer at EnerNex
Val Jensen, senior vice president of customer operations at ComEd
Ian McCaig, chief executive of First Utility
Brewster McCracken, president and chief executive of Pecan Street Research
Rob Pratt, scientist at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Steve Raschke, CEO of Candi Controls
Doug Scheller, vice president of business intelligence at BRIDGE Energy Group
John J. Simmins, technical executive at the Electric Power Research Institute
Michael Valocchi, a global energy and utilities industry analyst at IBM Business Services
Bill Wilkins, chief information officer of First Utility
The survey drew on 150 responses from energy and natural-resources executives around the world, comprising 50 in each of the mining, utilities, and oil and gas industries. Equal numbers were from North America (30%), Asia-Pacific (30%) and Western Europe (30%). Of the 30 countries represented, the most responses came from the
US, India, Australia, Spain and the UK. Half of respondents are C-level executives or equivalent, 17% are vice-presidents or equivalent and 22% are senior managers. About two-fifths (41%) represent very large companies, with annual revenues of US$1bn or more. Please see the appendix for full survey demographics.
Who took the survey?
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 20143
Utilities and the customer connection
Introduction
The explosive growth of mobile communications—and the rise of apps and highly mobile social media, in particular—are radically changing how businesses serve consumers. Even utilities, not known for consumer savvy, are finding that they must embrace these popular new communication tools or face the competitive pressures from companies that do. This digital embrace will forever alter the utility-customer relationship, making utilities more responsive and engaged—and leading them to increasingly view customers not as “captive rate payers” but as partners who enable more efficient and sustainable operations. This may be especially true for power companies, which are operating strained grids and looking to move into the smart-grid era.
Powerful mobile devices continue to proliferate and alter consumer behaviour. Between 2011 and 2013, smartphone use grew 46% and tablet use
grew 98%, according to Deloitte Research. And consumers are increasingly using their mobile devices to do business with companies; Juniper Research predicts that the value of mobile commerce transactions globally will top $3.2trn in 2017, up from $1.5trn in 2013—driven by a surge in mobile bill payments.
How will these trends affect utilities? According to an August 2013 global survey of 50 utilities executives by the Economist Intelligence Unit, which also polled 50 mining and 50 oil and gas executives, mobile strategies are having the greatest impact on utilities’ efforts to improve field-force efficiencies and outage management. But a third, and perhaps more important, aspect—improving customer engagement—is what has utility executives really talking, but not always agreeing.
Most utilities executives acknowledge that mobile strategies can play an important role in
The opportunity to use mobile strategies to engage customers has utilities executives talking, but not always agreeing.
To what extent can mobility strategies help improve your company’s response to enhancing customer engagement?% of respondents in the mining industry
Strongly Moderately Minimally Not at all
Source: Economist Intelligence Unit survey, November 2013.
33% 45%
8%14%
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 20144
Utilities and the customer connection
customer engagement by providing storm and outage information, helping customers manage energy use and offering them advice and incentives to conserve energy—and can generally build customer loyalty. But how much utilities are willing to invest in mobile technologies remains an open question—one that is currently “rippling across the industry”, says John J. Simmins, technical executive at the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), an industry-funded research organisation.
Executives are divided over whether their companies will dedicate funds in the near term to boosting mobile customer engagement. While 46% of utility executives surveyed by the EIU see a critical need to engage customers, only 36% say their companies have near-term investment plans. This gap suggests that, while mobile customer engagement sounds good to many utilities executives, the value proposition is still unclear. This may be especially true for those who must win regulatory approval to make large-scale investment that might lead to rate hikes.
Utilities executives should look deeper. While sceptics have valid concerns, utilities cannot afford to miss the strategic opportunities that mobile technologies offer to reduce long-term market risks and fortify customer relationships.
Utilities face a difficult challenge: growing
demand must be served by an ageing infrastructure. Much of the world’s basic infrastructure has exceeded its design lifetime, says Erich Gunther, chairman and chief technology officer at EnerNex, a utilities consultancy. “Replacing basic infrastructure globally would cost more than $1.5trn by 2030.” Of course, inaction hurts, too. A crumbling grid is a costly grid—EPRI estimates that US power outages cost between $104bn and $164bn a year. Most utilities are opting to make the grids that are already in place smarter, more connected and more efficient—and mobile technologies will play a key role, Mr Gunther says.
Emerging risks that mobile strategies could help mitigate include those from new market entrants looking to own and leverage those relationships; “demand-response” programs, which offer electricity customers incentives to reduce usage during times of peak demand or stress; and micro-grids and self-generation systems that could pull large customers off the electricity grid altogether.
Meanwhile, the expanded deployment of smart grids is affording energy companies opportunities to harness a vast new universe of data—the big data revolution—to improve customer satisfaction, realise operational cost savings and develop new sources of revenue.
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 20145
Utilities and the customer connection
Utilities and the new era of demanding, mobile-empowered customers 1
After Hurricane Sandy slammed into America’s East Coast, millions of people turned to the Internet, often using smartphones, for information about power and gas outages.
Some utilities saw a nearly ten-fold increase in followers on Twitter and Facebook. According to Mr Simmins of EPRI, three employees huddled in a room at one north-eastern utility sent out 9,000 tweets and received 90,000 incoming messages. The barrage was a wake-up call for executives, he
says. With tens of thousands of new Twitter followers, many utilities began to ask themselves what to do with all these newfound connections.
In most of the US and Europe, customer engagement is king, and mobile devices and social networks are increasingly the best means of reaching customers.
In the UK electricity market, acquiring a customer costs about three-quarters of his first year of utility bills, says Bill Wilkins, chief
❛❛ Utilities are faced with a decision. They either need to embrace the vision of being a consumer-facing business, offering consumers value and convenience, or they are destined to become a ‘wires’ company—and they’ll do only that.❜❜Rob Pratt, scientist at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
To what extent can mobile communication (eg, alerts and apps) help improve the following areas of customer engagement? % of 41 respondents in the utilities and oil & gas industries that describe themselves as retail, integrated, downstream or services businesses.
Providing customers with advice on consumption
Providing customers with targeted offers
Facilitating smart-grid deployment
Notifying customers about potential or actual outages and
recommending actions
Receiving customer reports on potential causes and actual
causes of outages
Incentivising customers to reduce consumption during
high demand periodsRecapturing customer loyalty
and engagementFacilitating and managing increasing eCar2Grid loads
Source: Economist Intelligence Unit survey, November 2013.
34%
54%50%54%
35%37%
20%
38%
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 20146
Utilities and the customer connection
information officer at First Utility. To boost loyalty—and, thus, the bottom line—First Utility partnered with Opower to let customers monitor and track electricity use with their mobile devices, making information about kilowatt hours used more meaningful and actionable.
“If you don’t have something other than a transactional relationship with the customer,” says First Utility’s CEO, Ian McCaig, “then your brand has no relevance or meaning to the daily lives of customers.”
Indeed, Jesse Berst, editor of the SmartGrid News and long-time observer of electricity markets, argues that a new era of customer engagement is at hand. “Every business—and this absolutely includes utilities—now needs to reach out proactively to its customers whenever, wherever customers want it,” he says. “It’s very important that you find your customers where they are. It’s about knowing what each individual customer’s preferences are, what programmes they’re signed up for and giving them that tailored experience. That’s what we mean by customer engagement.”
At a time when banks and many other
businesses offer mobile services to consumers, should utilities to do the same? They certainly have challenges that better, quicker customer engagement could help address. Mobile alerts could help electricity companies encourage consumers to curb electricity use during times of peak demand. Utilities of all kinds could distribute information and coupons that might build customer loyalty.
Utilities also face critical long-term risks should they fail to engage customers effectively, says Rob Pratt, a lead scientist studying smart-grid deployment, communications architecture and electricity markets at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) in Richland, Washington.
“Utilities are faced with a decision,” Mr Pratt says. “They either need to embrace the vision of being a consumer-facing business, offering consumers value and convenience, or they are destined to become a ‘wires’ company—and they’ll do only that. They will be ‘dis-intermediated’, in other words, from their customers by other entities that offer these customer-facing services.”
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 20147
Utilities and the customer connection
Many utilities are diving into the customer-engagement waters by partnering with energy consulting companies and consumer-app developers, mostly in an effort to boost brand loyalty and build services that help customers manage their energy consumption.
ComEd, a unit of Chicago-based Exelon, recently partnered with energy app developer Opower to build a platform that puts “control back into our customers’ hands”, says Val Jensen, ComEd’s senior vice president of customer operations. Baltimore-based utility BGE is also handing over control with its Peak Time Rebate Program, which uses emails, tweets and other prompts to help participating customers save on their electricity bills if they reduce their electricity use during peak periods.
All this is great for utilities—unless platform developers like Opower and other new entrants into electricity markets become the go-to player for customers. As customers become more actively engaged in their electricity delivery, such companies are increasingly offering products and services once exclusively under the purview of utilities. For instance, companies like Calico Energy of Bellevue, Washington, are offering an array of analytics, demand-management, load-control and smart-grid management services that utilities need but increasingly are unable to handle on their own.
“The danger,” says Mr Berst, “is that what happened to telecom companies might happen to utilities. When rate-paying customers begin to
have a relationship with some other party—energy management becoming just a piece of that relationship—and customers don’t really care who the utility is, that could have some long-term negative implications for utilities.”
But others argue that the risk to utilities of dis-intermediation by third parties is overblown. “Mobile apps and mobile computing are transforming just about every industry on the planet,” says Brewster McCracken, president and chief executive of Pecan Street Research, a smart-grid and electricity markets research consortium based in Austin, Texas. But he doesn’t see apps taking off like wildfire. “Utilities apps are things that people are, generally, at best sporadically, interested in, but they’re not transformative. They’re not useless; it’s just not transformative.”
But soon things could be quite different, according to Michael Valocchi, a global energy and utilities industry analyst at IBM Business Services. At a recent SAP utilities conference, Mr Valoccchi predicted that, within 10 years, threats to utilities’ revenue streams from new entrants and demand-response programs will force utilities to develop new business models and alliances.
Already, electricity-rate aggregators are offering middleman services; they will handle energy-efficiency issues for businesses, find ways to save them money and negotiate better power deals for them with utilities companies. Some municipalities are realising that their aggregated electricity
Meet the new entrants eyeing utilities’ customers2
❛❛ The danger is that what happened to telecom companies might happen to utilities.❜❜Jesse Berst, editor of the SmartGrid News
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 20148
Utilities and the customer connection
demand has become a key leverage point for negotiating better rates on the open market. Hospitals, universities, military bases and others are exploring the idea of using cheap natural gas for self-generation of power with micro-turbines and other means, leaving the traditional grid behind in a trend called “grid divorce”.
“That would be a disaster for utilities,” says Mr McCracken, “because utilities make all their money selling base-load electricity, and they make most of
their money from large commercial customers. Micro-grids could take all the meat of utility profits, leaving only the gristle.”
So while utilities might appreciate the reduced pressure on their stressed grids today, they should beware of too much of a good thing. “As new entrants reach out directly to consumers and bypass energy providers,” Mr Valocchi says, “the unspoken mandate will be innovate, partner or die.”
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 20149
Utilities and the customer connection
With increased deployment of smart-grid systems and “smart” appliances, experts expect that demand-response programmes will become a long-term feature of the shifting electricity marketplace—and customer engagement, facilitated by social media and mobile apps, will become important gateways for utilities.
Why? Because residential- and commercial-customer loyalty will increasingly be won or lost on the quality of utility-app dashboards. Take the PowerTools app, a platform developed by Candi Controls of San Francisco in partnership with San Diego Gas & Electric. Like others of its kind, the PowerTools dashboard offers customers a way to visualise cost and usage information and make consumption decisions. It provides a history of customers’ electricity savings and lets them set usage goals and track progress in achieving those goals. It also provides alerts, coupons and bill-paying services.
Most important for utilities, the platform will eventually be a kind of Rosetta Stone for building utility relationships “beyond the meter”, according to Steve Raschke, CEO of Candi Controls. If utilities can connect to any smart-grid device that a customer happens to buy, no matter what language that device uses, then utilities will own the customer’s energy environment. The utility app becomes a strategic-control point—a gateway—to all systems and smart-grid-enabled devices.
“But if utilities don’t position themselves correctly, they’ll end up paying for that position later,” Mr Raschke says.
Staying ahead of demand-response
More than 38m advanced smart-grid meters have now been installed in the US, with that number expected to nearly double by 2015, when 50% of households in 22 states will have advanced smart-grid meters, according to the Institute for Electric Efficiency (IEE). A more mature smart-grid will increase customers’ expectation of choices in how and when—and with what devices—they interact with the grid. And when customers exercise this choice, utilities will feel the imperative to respond.
Add to the equation commercial and industrial smart-building systems—systems that control and monitor electricity use in offices and factories via two-way smart-grid connections. Such systems enable utilities to find extra capacity when it is needed during demand peaks, drawing extra supply from buildings that have supply to offer. When smart buildings band together—they can be connected as a suite of aggregated buildings or smart communities—that aggregated electricity demand and supply creates an entirely new partnership between utilities and their customers.
Indeed, a recent EPRI study foresees a new landscape in which “commercial buildings are increasingly able to provide a range of grid-support functions.” In exchange for this new demand-response service, commercial-building owners will expect tailored or adjustable electricity rates.
Controlling the gateways to customers 3
Aggregated electricity demand and supply will create an entirely new partnership between utilities and their customers.
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 201410
Utilities and the customer connection
Tapping big data
The expansion of the smart-grid will usher in a new age of massive data inflows. These data will bring enormous new opportunities for utilities, says Mr Valocchi of IBM, including cost savings from improved efficiencies in smart-grid markets, reduced electricity theft and the ability to predict system failures and vulnerabilities. They will also let utilities identify customer segments—for example, groups based on energy-use patterns—and offer them specialised products and services.
However, utilities have taken a cautious, albeit inquisitive, stance towards big data analysis amid uncertainty about the return on investment. They should not be so timid. Small improvements in efficiency can provide significant returns. For instance, a 1% improvement in efficiency across
natural-gas-fired power plants globally would yield $66bn in fuel savings, according to a study commissioned by General Electric. Bigger returns will come from improved ability to predict customer needs, says Doug Scheller, vice president of business intelligence at BRIDGE Energy Group, a utilities energy consultancy based in Marlborough, Massachusetts.
“As smart-grid data becomes richer, there is the prospect of some significant income opportunities emerging from data unrelated to electricity use,” says Mr McCracken of Pecan Street. These data have never been available to product makers before but will be valuable to them. “Utilities will charge rents for access to their digital infrastructure, the same way that cable and mobile telecom [companies] charge rents for access to their digital infrastructure,” he says.
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 201411
Utilities and the customer connection
For many, the key benefits of mobile technologies are of the blocking-and-tackling sort: field-force improvements and operational savings from more efficient maintenance, meter readings, response to outages and the like. Much more could be done in this regard; a 2012 EPRI study shows little has yet been done to improve the efficiency of interactions between utilities operations centres and field-force workers.
To demonstrate the opportunities, EPRI used a souped-up iPad 2 to help workers “see” electrical networks out in the field in real time using augmented reality. Field workers were able to visualise important network-asset information, create work requests while on site, access maintenance manuals, obtain real-time analysis of systems status and visualise problems in the field. For example, electricity grid diagrams can be superimposed on satellite imagery of a parking lot to show workers exactly where important lines are buried. Such tools offer the potential to greatly reduce work cycles, reduce dangerous accidents and shorten outage times, among other benefits.
Most utilities executives quickly grasp the potential benefits to the industry, including lower services costs and capital expenditures, reduced risks and regulator fines and increased revenue. Indeed, an overwhelming majority (80%) of the 50 utilities executives surveyed by the EIU believe that mobile strategies can improve field-force efficiency, productivity and capacity.
Following Hurricane Sandy, some electric utility
regulators began pushing utilities to implement alternative ways to managing outages effectively and prepare for a world in which severe storms increase in number and intensity.
In an electricity environment where uncertainty reigns, investing in innovation will not always bring certain returns, says IBM’s Mr Valocchi. “Where variables abound,” utilities should view investments as “buying an option for potential control points”. The mobile devices in tucked customers’ pockets are key control points that utilities can ill-afford to ignore.
With time, mobile control points will apply to new markets. E-car connections to the grid will be by definition mobile, and these “auto-mobile” connections will be made through applications accessed via handsets or built into e-cars themselves. “You may or may not agree on the rate of uptake of e-cars,” Mr Valocchi says. “But what if they arrive? What control point do you want to have in that eventuality?”
Other revenue opportunities are likely to emerge from the Internet of Things revolution and the data these machines produce as well as from strong customer relationships established via social media and mobile applications.
In this changing environment, those utilities that act now to grab opportunities to bolster their market positions and gain new revenue sources will find themselves with the strategic advantage in the electricity marketplace of the future.
Conclusion: Preparing for the future4
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 201412
Utilities and the customer connection
Appendix: survey results
Percentages may not add to 100% owing to rounding or the ability of respondents to choose multiple responses.
Well above average
Somewhat above average
Average/on par with peers
Somewhat below average
Well below average
Don’t know
Profitability
Revenue growth
Market share
Customer loyalty
Innovation
Productivity
Safety
Regulatory compliance
In your opinion, how effective is your organisation in each of the following performance indicators compared with its peers? Please rate on a scale from ‘Well above average’ to Well below average’. (% respondents)
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
18 40 30 10 2 18 40 36 2 4 26 46 26 2 14 30 46 10 18 32 32 14 4 24 52 20 2 2 24 36 28 6 6 16 24 40 18 2 20 40 32 4 2 2 26 38 30 6 18 48 28 2 4 22 46 28 4 24 30 34 12 14 42 22 16 4 2 28 38 28 2 4 22 40 32 6 20 32 36 10 2 10 68 20 2 34 40 24 2 26 42 24 2 4 2 28 50 20 2 30 34 34 2 30 44 24 2 24 54 20 2
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 201413
Utilities and the customer connection
How do your employees access information in the field today? Please select top two.(% respondents)
Laptops
Smartphones
Radios
Tablets
Paper
Machine-to-machine communication outputs
Handheld computers
Other
Utilities Oil and gas Mining
62 64 52
22 38 40
24 20 42
18 26 16
22 18 12
20 14 16
20 14 10
200
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 201414
Utilities and the customer connection
How do you expect your employees to access information in the field 5 years from now? Please select top two.(% respondents)
Tablets
Smartphones
Laptops
Handheld computers
Machine-to-machine communication outputs
Radios
Paper
Other
Utilities Oil and gas Mining
66 56 66
38 62 48
38 28 30
16 28 16
12 14 18
10 6 12
40 4
4 20
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 201415
Utilities and the customer connection
Excellent
Very good Fair Somewhat poor
Very poor Don’t know
The workload and status of field workers
Conditions in the field that affect productivity (ie, assets, infrastructure and people)
Conditions in the field hazardous to health and safety
Market trends and events
Customer trends and events
How do you rate the ability of key experts or decision-makers at your company to understand and respond appropriately in real-time to the following conditions using mobile data and communications? Please select a response in each row on a scale from ‘Excellent’ to ‘Very poor’. (% respondents)
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
6 46 46 2 14 42 34 8 2 14 60 24 2 26 34 36 4 22 34 34 10 32 20 42 6 10 48 38 2 2 20 44 26 8 2 24 50 26 12 44 30 12 2 10 46 32 10 2 18 46 34 2 10 46 38 6 6 36 50 6 2 12 58 24 4 2
What are the main constraints you face in getting access to timely field data in general? Please select top three.(% respondents)
Approvals cause lag-time
Wireless connections are not available or sufficiently reliable
Our data collection capabilities in the field are inadequate (eg, for inspections, surveys, audits)
Paperwork causes lag-time
Our data communication capabilities to and in the field are inadequate (eg, for coordination, collaboration, support, intelligence)
Mobile devices are not sufficiently reliable or safe
Other
None of the above
Utilities Oil and gas Mining
36 50 20
38 34 34
28 30 38
34 34 26
26 22 28
22 28 12
0 40
24 14 36
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 201416
Utilities and the customer connection
What are the main constraints you face in remote or hazardous locations, specifically? Please select top three.(% respondents)
Wireless connections are not available or sufficiently reliable
Our data collection capabilities in the field are inadequate (eg, for inspections, surveys, audits)
Mobile devices are not sufficiently reliable or safe
Approvals cause lag-time
Our data communication capabilities to and in the field are inadequate (eg, for coordination, collaboration, support, intelligence)
Paperwork causes lag-time
Other
None of the above
Utilities Oil and gas Mining
46 46 40
34 38 36
34 42 18
28 34 16
22 20 30
22 20 14
0 2 2
24 14 36
Highly Moderately Minimally Not at all
Paperwork causes lag-time
Approvals cause lag-time
Wireless connections are not available or sufficiently reliable
Mobile devices are not sufficiently reliable or safe
Our data collection capabilities in the field are inadequate (eg, for inspections, surveys, audits)
Our data communication capabilities to and in the field are inadequate (eg, for coordination, collaboration, support, intelligence)
To what extent do these constraints affect your ability to make good decisions quickly? Please select a response in each row on a scale from ‘Highly’ to ‘Not at all’. (% respondents)
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
26 58 11 5 35 55 10 43 36 14 7 35 55 10 48 41 11 39 54 8 23 62 12 4 15 62 19 4 39 57 4 16 63 16 5 26 61 13 40 50 10 20 45 30 5 38 46 8 8 27 55 18 7 64 29 33 53 13 59 41
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 201417
Utilities and the customer connection
Appendix: consumer survey results
Which of the following are obstacles to your company expanding its use of mobile? Please select all that apply. (% respondents)
My company is concerned about the security of mobile data
My company is concerned about the cost of expanding its use of mobile
My company is concerned that mobile unreliability will put critical processes at risk
My company is concerned that mobile unreliability will require costly redundant communication systems
Cultural obstacles in my workforce (eg, discomfort with new technologies) limit our adoption of mobile technologies
My company sees other communications options (eg, fixed-line, radio) as preferable to mobile communications
Other
My company does not face obstacles to expanding its use of mobile
Utilities Oil and gas Mining
49 49 41
39 42 53
36 30 28
33 37 16
18 26 38
23 7 16
5 5 6
18 7 13
Do customer mobile apps aid your smart-grid management? (% of respondents in the utilities industries)
Yes
No
62
38
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 201418
Utilities and the customer connection
Appendix: consumer survey results
Strongly Moderately Minimally Not at all Don’t know/ Not applicable
Reducing paperwork
Reducing approval lag-time
Scheduling and crew management
Crisis or emergency management
Preventing failures
Environmental safety and sustainability
Achieving high productivity and capacity (eg, reducing downtime)
Assuring regulatory compliance
Enhancing customer engagement
Taking customer meter readings
Peak-load management and demand response
Smart-grid management
Assuring product quality
To what extent can mobility strategies help improve your company’s response to the following operational challenges? Please select a response in each row on a scale from ‘Strongly’ to ‘Not at all’. (% respondents)
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
34 56 8 2 32 48 18 2 24 62 14 33 51 14 2 38 44 16 2 26 50 24 25 49 22 2 2 22 54 22 2 20 42 36 2 46 44 6 2 2 40 42 16 2 14 67 16 2 31 35 31 2 2 25 41 18 12 4 20 54 24 2 16 55 25 4 20 36 34 8 2 14 59 27 28 56 14 2 28 52 16 2 2 16 61 22 16 35 37 8 4 14 41 39 4 2 22 46 32 33 45 14 8 33 39 25 4 18 46 34 2 38 38 18 4 2 34 44 18 4
34 42 10 10 4
10 51 31 6 2
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 201419
Utilities and the customer connection
In which areas of mobility do you think your company most needs to improve to enhance its performance today? Please select top three. (% respondents)
Mobile data security
Mobile connectivity (eg, wireless telecom network, Wi-Fi networking)
Data collection in the field
Big data analysis
4D (3D space and time) and visual display of geophysical data
Data delivery to offsite to headquarters or other sites where decision-makers are located
Mobile devices and platforms (ie, hardware and software)
Customer engagement
None of the above
Utilities Oil and gas Mining
48 52 32
46 40 34
34 32 36
40 28 32
34 28 38
30 22 36
32 32 16
16 8 16
20 12
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 201420
Utilities and the customer connection
In which areas of mobility is your company most likely to invest over the next five years? Please select top three. (% respondents)
Mobile data security
4D (3D space and time) and visual display of geophysical data
Big data analysis
Mobile connectivity (eg, wireless telecom network, Wi-Fi networking)
Data collection in the field
Data delivery to offsite to headquarters or other sites where decision-makers are located
Mobile devices and platforms (ie, hardware and software)
Customer engagement
None of the above
Utilities Oil and gas Mining
46 58 32
46 30 50
36 46 34
36 34 28
26 24 42
26 28 34
28 30 14
22 8 10
00 10
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 201421
Utilities and the customer connection
What mobile technology do you use to enhance health and safety? Please select all that apply. (% respondents)
Laptops
Smartphones
GPS/GIS for mapping sites and locating resources
Radios
Tablets
Mobile telemetry (ie, for collection and transmission of data to surface sensors and software systems)
Handheld computers
Augmented reality (ie, for interactive 3D visualisation)
Robotics for reaching difficult or hazardous areas
Other
We don’t use mobile technologies to enhance health and safety
None of the above
Utilities Oil and gas Mining
62 64 50
56 64 50
50 54 56
40 34 44
36 42 30
24 34 32
30 20 34
8 20 28
8 18 28
200
2 4 8
400
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 201422
Utilities and the customer connection
How do you use mobile technologies to improve worker health and safety? Please select all that apply. (% respondents)
Workers have devices that improve their communication while in the field
Workers have devices that improve their communication while underground or in remote or hazardous locations
Mobile devices collect data on employee performance that we use to prevent incidents or put in place evidence-based health and safety improvements
Mobile devices guide workers in order to prevent incidents
Mobile devices detect and communicate hazardous conditions (eg, buildups of underground gases in mines)
Mobile communication facilitates quicker repairs and better maintenance of assets
Other
We don't use mobile technologies to improve worker health and safety
None of the above
Utilities Oil and gas Mining
62 72 46
38 44 48
48 32 48
38 26 36
24 32 40
32 30 26
000
0 6 12
4 20
Strong improvement
Moderately improvement
Weak improvement
No improvement
Don’t know
We have detected hazards (eg, buildups of underground gases) or prevented explosions and other incidents
We have prevented worker incidents and accidents
We have responded more quickly to worker incidents and accidents and unplanned outages
We have reduced worker incidents and accidents and related costs
We have saved workers’ lives
How much have mobile technologies helped you to improve on the following health and safety measures? Please select a response in each row on a scale from ‘Strong improvement’ to ‘No improvement’. (% respondents)
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
MINING
4 56 8 6 25 17 38 25 6 15 18 66 6 6 4 25 33 23 4 15 19 44 19 6 13 30 40 22 6 2 27 42 15 4 13 30 40 13 4 13 30 46 18 4 2 22 49 10 6 12 23 38 23 4 13 42 28 22 6 2 15 46 13 8 19 15 38 19 9 19 26 48 18 2 6
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 201423
Utilities and the customer connection
Strongly Moderately Minimally Not at all Don’t know
Recapturing customer loyalty and engagement (ie, from competing service providers, rate aggregators, utility intermediaries, etc)
Providing customers with advice on consumption
Providing customers with targeted offers
Facilitating smart-grid deployment
Incentivising customers to reduce consumption during high demand periods (ie, through time-of-day variable rates)
Receiving customer reports on potential causes and actual causes of outages (eg, storm damage, leaning poles)
Notifying customers about potential or actual outages and recommending actions
Facilitating and managing increasing eCar2Grid loads
To what extent can mobile communication (eg, alerts and apps) help improve the following areas of customer engagement? Please select a response in each row on a scale from ‘Strongly’ to ‘Not at all’. (% respondents)
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
17 44 22 6 11 17 50 21 8 4
29 47 6 6 12 25 42 17 13 4
33 39 11 6 11 21 42 25 8 4
29 35 12 12 12 21 25 29 21 4
22 44 11 11 11 13 42 21 17 8
24 24 24 12 18 13 50 13 13 13
17 44 22 6 11 21 42 17 17 4
12 29 18 18 24 8 38 17 17 21
0-3 years 4-6 years More than 6 years
Don’t know
Recapturing customer loyalty and engagement (ie, from competing service providers, rate aggregators, utility intermediaries, etc.)
Providing customers with advice on consumption
Providing customers with targeted offers
Facilitating smart-grid deployment
Incentivising customers to reduce consumption during high demand periods (ie, through time-of-day variable rates)
Receiving customer reports on potential causes or actual causes of outages (eg, storm damage, leaning poles)
Notifying customers about potential or actual outages and recommending actions
Facilitating and managing increasing eCar2Grid loads
How long do you expect it to take for your company to rollout mobile capabilities to customers to enhance engagement in these areas? (% respondents)
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
UTILITIES
OIL AND GAS
64 21 7 7 60 35 5
57 36 7 55 35 10
57 36 7 80 15 5
62 31 8 50 33 6 11
71 21 7 47 47 6
58 42 44 44 6 6
60 27 13 59 35 6
50 40 10 40 40 7 13
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 201424
Utilities and the customer connection
United States of America
India
Australia, Spain, United Kingdom
Canada, Germany
China, Singapore, South Africa, Sweden
Thailand
Argentina, Austria, Colombia, Denmark, France, Nigeria, Switzerland, Chile, Cyprus, Greece, Hong Kong, Lebanon, Malaysia, Mexico, Norway, Pakistan, Poland, Saudi Arabia
In which country are you personally located?(% respondents)
25
12
7
5
3
2
1
Asia-Pacific
North America
Western Europe
Middle East and Africa
Latin America
Eastern Europe
In which region are you personally located?(% respondents)
30
30
30
6
4
0
Less than $100m
$100m-$500m
$500m-$999m
$1bn-$4.9bn
$5bn-$9.9bn
$10bn or more
What are your organisation’s global annual revenue in US dollars?(% respondents)
15
35
9
22
4
15
Board member
CEO/President/Managing director
CFO/Treasurer/Comptroller
CIO/Technology director
Other C-level executive
SVP/VP/Director
Head of business unit
Head of department
Manager
Other
Which of the following best describes your title?(% respondents)
2
7
8
9
24
17
5
17
11
0
General management
Finance
Operations and production
IT
Marketing and sales
Risk
Legal
Procurement
Supply-chain management
Information and research
R&D
Customer service
Human resources
Other
What is your main functional role?(% respondents)
21
16
15
13
11
6
5
5
3
2
2
1
0
0
© The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 201425
Utilities and the customer connection
Whilst every effort has been taken to verify the accuracy of this
information, neither The Economist Intelligence Unit Ltd. nor the
sponsor of this report can accept any responsibility or liability
for reliance by any person on this white paper or any of the
information, opinions or conclusions set out in the white paper.
About our Sponsor
As the world’s leading provider of enterprise application
software, SAP delivers products and services that help
accelerate business innovation for its more than 183,000
customers in more than 120 countries. See more related to this
report at sap.com/mobile-powerutilities
Cove
r: N
ASA
London20 Cabot SquareLondon E14 4QWUnited KingdomTel: (44.20) 7576 8000Fax: (44.20) 7576 8476E-mail: [email protected]
New York750 Third Avenue5th FloorNew York, NY 10017United StatesTel: (1.212) 554 0600Fax: (1.212) 586 0248E-mail: [email protected]
Hong Kong6001, Central Plaza18 Harbour RoadWanchai Hong KongTel: (852) 2585 3888Fax: (852) 2802 7638E-mail: [email protected]
GenevaBoulevard des Tranchées 161206 GenevaSwitzerlandTel: (41) 22 566 2470Fax: (41) 22 346 93 47E-mail: [email protected]