how much is the contribution of contact … much is the contribution of contact investigation to tb...
TRANSCRIPT
How much is the contribution of contact investigation to
TB case finding?
Presented by:
Dr. Woojin Lew Medical Officer
STB/WHO-Philippines
Mantala, M1; Averilla, ML1; Carillo, AL1; Lew, W1;
Andaya, O2; Medina, A3, Vianzon, R4
1Stop TB, Office of the WHO Representative in the Philippines, Manila, Philippines; 2City Health Office-Taguig City, Metro Manila; 3Center for Health Development-Metro
Manila, Philippines; 4National TB Program, Department of Health, Philippines
Background • around 100,000 TB cases were undetected in the
Philippines in 2009
• WHO recommended contact investigation (CI) as one of the strategies to find the “missing” cases
• It is NTP’s policy to investigate contacts of notified TB cases
– implementation is erratic
– data are unavailable
• NTP, through the CATCH TB cases project, tested CI as one of the strategies to find additional TB cases
•
Collaboration for Additional TB cases through
Contacts and Hospitals against TB
Engaging
Hospitals
Focusing on
High Risk
Groups
Intensifying
Household
contact investigation
Diabetes Urban Poor
Objective • To determine the contribution of contact
investigation to the case finding outputs of the participating cities.
Key Activities • developed implementing
guidelines and tools
• trained the staffs of 87 health centers
• mobilized community volunteers to follow-up household contacts
• quarterly desk review by city
• regularly reviewed overall progress of the initiative
Procedure • Household members of registered
TB cases were evaluated by a health center physician and listed in a registry
• Screening, diagnosis and treatment followed the NTP policies
• TB patients identified were initiated treatment at the health center
• Data were consolidated and analyzed
Summary of Household Contact Investigation 87 health centers, July 2010 – June 2012
9,831 8,666
30,226
25,918
1,699 589 0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
Total Indexcase
identified
Index caseinvestigated
Totalcontacts
identified
Contactsscreened
TBsymptomatic
TB cases
88%
86%
7% 2%
4663 57 70
40
49 474412
33 50
78
0
50
100
150
200
250
Jul-Dec2010 Jan-Jun2011 Jul-Dec2011 Jan-Jun2012
<5 y/o 5-14 y/o 15 and up
Secondary TB Cases Found by Age Group,
per semester (n=589)
98
145 154
192 105 (18%) secondary TB
cases were smear positive
Contribution of CI to Case finding, Six cities, 2011 and First Semester, 2012
Cities
No. of
notified TB
cases,
2011
No. and
Percent
contributed by
CI
Muntinlupa 968 39 (4%)
Navotas 1,198 88 (7%)
Paranaque 667 29 (4%)
Pateros 119 10 (8%)
Pasay 562 35 (6%)
Taguig 1,063 96 (9%)
TOTAL 4,577 297 (6.5%)
Contribution of CI to Case Finding Six Cities, 2011
968
1,198
667
119
562
1,063
4% 7%
4% 8% 6%
9%
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Muntinlupa Navotas Paranaque Pateros Pasay Taguig
TB cases notified % Contribution
Contribution of CI to Case finding, Six cities, 2011 and First Semester, 2012
Cities
No. of
notified TB
cases,
2011
No. and
Percent
contributed by
CI
No. of
notified TB
cases, 1st
semester
2012
No. and
Percent
contributed
by CI
Muntinlupa 968 39 (4%) 517 27 (5%)
Navotas 1,198 88 (7%) 714 39 (5%)
Paranaque 667 29 (4%) 647 32 (5%)
Pateros 119 10 (8%) 71 9 (13%)
Pasay 562 35 (6%) 503 33 (7%)
Taguig 1,063 96 (9%) 1,186 52 (4%)
TOTAL 4,577 297 (6.5%) 3,638 192 (5.3%)
Operational problems and interventions
• Contacts not coming to health centers
• Used community volunteers to visit and convince them
• Decreasing TB symptomatics identified
• Decreasing yield of secondary TB cases detected
• Used CXR as screening in some areas
• Enhanced the symptomatology screening
• Use of a “guide” for community volunteers & health center staff to elicit signs and symptoms
• Perform DSSM for cough of ANY duration
Conclusion • Systematizing contact investigation
contributed in finding more TB cases especially among children.
• The NTP plans to incorporate the CI guidelines and tools in the revised Manual of Procedures.
• This strategy will be scaled up nationwide.