how structural collaboration leads to value propositions in the financial sector
TRANSCRIPT
In the (post-)crisis era, challenging the status quo
through innovation will be critical to restore profitability
in the financial sector. The commoditisation of products
within the industry is making it very difficult to compete
on price. Moreover, a whole array of non-banking
entities is entering the market to close the gap between
the offerings of banks and the needs of customers.
Suddenly, banks face competition from telcos,
supermarkets, tech firms and innovative start-ups, all
experienced in building online relationships and
developing and marketing transparent products.
In this paper we explain how financial institutions
can install structural collaboration
trajectories with key stakeholders (consumers,
employees, management) in order to develop true value
propositions consumers are willing to pay for.
What to expect?
Time to innovate is NOW!
“Customers judge across their entire set of
experiences rather than just comparing your
organization to others like it. We want our
technology to be as intuitive and user-friendly as
Apple products, the service we receive to be as
thoughtful as we might get from Nordstrom, and
personalization and ease of payment as good as
Amazon’s” (Forbes, Rita McGrath, Five Big Trends in Business Innovation in 2012).
So from a bank‟s point of view the competitive frame
of reference has expanded considerably and at a
frightening pace.
As a result, only financial institutions which
invest in service innovations taking
advantage of a profound understanding of
consumer needs and demands will be able to
outperform competition. (IBM Institute for
Business Value 2010)
However… …impediments to innovate are probably more persistent in the financial sector than in any other industry. Strict
regulations, low margins, legacy, long time to market, focus on short-term financial success, commoditisation of
services & products, IT-driven NPD, lack of organisational structures & funds fostering innovation… most often result in
banks embracing the opposite of an open-innovation-minded culture. (Accenture Research, 2010)
With the rise of web 2.0 and social media, new
tools are available for organisations to facilitate
open innovation and structural collaboration
processes. In the next chapters, we explain why
and how to install structural
collaboration trajectories with internal
and external stakeholders (consumers,
employees, management), what the keys to
success are and the implications for the
organization. We end with concrete cases in the
telco, aviation and financial sector.
Here’s the
solution!
Power to
the people
When we talk about open
innovation or structural
collaboration, we refer to the
integration of the voice of
the customer in all decision-
making flows of your
company. In most companies,
customers are only allowed to
give their feedback at the very
end of a decision-making flow
through traditional market
research. This paper gives
insights on how to involve
the customer in every single
phase of the decision-
making flow on an on-going
basis. Currently, only 3% of all
companies have experience
with developing new products
and services with their
consumers.
In most cases, this
collaboration starts with a pilot
project. If the test is
successful, the collaboration
can gradually be built up in a
more structural manner. Less
than one out of ten companies
which co-create with their
customers also uses this
collaboration for launching new
products or services. We could
say that the focus of co-
creation is mainly on the
initiation of new ideas. But
even if consumers are more or
less continually involved in the
process of dreaming up new
ideas, this is still not enough to
allow us to speak of „structural
collaboration‟.
Structural collaboration means that the customer is
involved in all aspects of your company’s life. This includes:
1. Getting new insights: Exploration of the target group. Listen directly to how
they perceive the product and service quality in order to optimize the commercial
portfolio. This also implies discovering new market trends and unmet needs from
your most relevant customers.
2. The development of new ideas and fine-tuning of existing ideas:
Create new commercial value together with the customer.
3. Key role during implementation: Include customers during the
implementation phase to make sure that your interpretation of their ideas is correct.
4. Continuous evaluation and optimization: Use the customer‟s voice as a
continuous flow of information to improve loads of smaller, tactical issues and to re-
shape the future of your company, your customer being your primary consultant.
Overview of structural collaboration and business issues
And it pays off: a recent article in the
„Harvard Business Review‟ claimed
that companies are more able to
solve all their main business
issues if they collaborate closely
with their consumers. The good
news is that consumers are also
willing to help companies out with
this: more than half of them want to
collaborate with one of their
favourite brands on one or more of
these issues. The goal of this paper
is to look into the necessary
ingredients for a company to
structurally get the consumer on
board.
The objectives of structural collaboration
Based on 17 interviews with senior executives of (global) brands from different industries, we came to the
conclusion that companies that are working on structural collaboration with their customers have four clear
objectives in mind with this approach:
1. Create better products, improve the
customer service and communicate in a
more impactful way. This is by far the most
important objective for large brands in order to
collaborate with consumers. By succeeding in this
objective, the overall performance of the
organization will increase.
2. Become more agile. By involving customers in
every phase of a decision-making chain, things
move faster. Companies can make better
decisions more rapidly and have a better feeling of
what will be needed to be equally successful in the
future. A big plus in today‟s fast-moving world.
3. Add consumer feeling to the gut feeling. A lot of
managers rely on their gut feeling, which is wonderful.
Structural collaboration should add „consumer feeling‟ to
it. By collaborating so often, managers create the ability to
put on the consumers‟ hat during a meeting and think as
the consumer. Which helps them to make more
consumer-relevant choices.
4. Marketing & PR. Companies that are listening and
that involve consumers in decision-making are popular
nowadays. Tell all your customers that you take decisions
based on consulting other customers, and they will like
you more. Leveraging the internal collaboration platforms
towards the external communication has an impact on the
overall perception. This is not the main goal, but a very
welcomed indirect effect.
An evolution,
not a revolution
It‟s clear that structural collaboration with consumers is
not about having the right technology to make it
happen. It is about a mentality shift for most
organisations. A shift from a „we know best‟ attitude
towards an open mentality. The most beautiful result
of collaborating companies is the creation of what we
just called the „consumer feeling’. Adding the
consumer feeling to the gut feeling of companies is
the biggest change one can achieve through structural
collaboration.
To reach this situation, a number of steps need to be
taken. Based on our research, we learned that all
companies started small and evolved towards bigger
and bigger collaboration projects. In the end,
collaboration was really embedded in their organization.
It was a process of change, not a revolution.
The evolution towards structural collaboration happens
in three steps:
1. Collaboration always starts with a first-time try out. Companies organize a co-creation project in which
they allow the customer to participate in one specific project. Most frequently occurring examples are co-
creation of a new product, a new package or new marketing communication.
2. If this try-out is experienced as a success, the second step is to apply collaboration on a project-based
level in the organization. In this stage, companies have the habit to involve customers in every
important new project they work on.
3. After a while, it becomes hard for them to take decisions without the voice of the customer during the
process and they decide to collaborate structurally.
1 Select the right participants
In our opinion there are two types of - meaningful -
structural customer collaboration : an open online
platform where everyone can participate and a
closed online community where you select the
people to join in. In the large open communities you
have little direct control over who joins and who
doesn‟t. The members come together in a
very spontaneous way to discuss particular
subjects of their interest. Your role with
regards to these people is simply to listen. This will
allow you to discover a series of unfulfilled market
needs, which may eventually lead to new products
and services. Of course, you are also free to ask
them questions, but you should always remember
that these are open communities - anyone else
might be listening to their answers!
Companies that want to involve the customer in
more strategic decisions and that have a need for in-
depth feedback, tend to work with a closed online
community with a limited number of relevant
customers. If you want to solve a specific
management problem, it is better to discuss possible
solutions with a smaller, closed group of between 50
and 150 of people with a keen interest for your
category. It could also be a group of your most
ardent fans, fans you have carefully vetted and
selected yourself. The major advantage of this
approach is that you have everything in your own
hands - and this is advisable if you don‟t want the
whole world to know what decisions are being taken.
Having said that, it is important to acknowledge that not
every customer will be able - or is suitable - to help you
solve management problems. To give your company
access to the right advice on a daily basis, you need to
listen to the right (and relevant) people. For your
communities you should seek to attract people who
can offer added value. The minimum condition is
that they have a clear commitment to the
company and what it stands for. They may be experts
in the sector, knowledgeable and enthusiastic amateurs
in the sector or just big fans of your brand.
Research has shown that without this kind of
emotional commitment people seldom are
interested enough to contribute effectively to an
online community. In other words, you need to
talk to people who are interesting and
interested. If they don‟t have an opinion or if
the natural motivation to take part is missing,
your community will not achieve what you want it
to achieve. But natural engagement is not
sufficient, in order to make your community a real
success you need to manage it well. Several
things are important: be open and transparent
about the goals of each project, listen actively
(allow participants to put their issues on your
agenda too), make it a fun experience (after all
people are doing this in their spare time) and give
enough feedback on what you did with their
answers.
1 Select the right participants
2 Internal communication is not enough
Internal = External
Managers show more interest in a project or
approach which gets external credits than in a
project with a sole internal focus. In other
words: make sure your structural
collaboration is not completely taking
place behind the scenes of your
organization.
Sharing your collaboration work with the whole
organisation and the rest of the world has several
advantages. Next to an increase in motivation of your
management, it will also increase the motivation of your
communities‟ participants. Further, research has shown
that consumers have a higher trust level towards and a
better perception of co-creating brands. So, there is also a
commercial benefit to leveraging your efforts externally.
Meet-up with participants:
Collaboration occurs on a
digital platform but it is an
interaction between people.
To increase the interaction
and the emotional bonding,
make sure your employees
meet up with these people in
the real world as well. Show
them around in your company,
tell them your challenges and
treat them like part-time
employees.
There are a few communication tactics you can apply to increase the internal and external impact of your
collaboration process:
Go for tangible
results: If you work
together with your
consumers on a
structural level, make
sure you have concrete
deliverables. These
results (e.g. new
products, insights,
advertising,
packaging…) should be
shared with the world in
order to make the
collaboration aspirational
for the market and for
the manager involved.
Bite-size &
creative
reporting: Share
the results of your
collaboration in a
short, compelling
and creative way
with your
employees. Make
sure it is easy to
digest and to
share.
Apply content marketing
techniques: Don‟t
communicate once or twice
about your collaboration, but
talk about it more frequently.
Use three levels of content: big
content campaigns (e.g. when
you have BIG news: launch of
an initiative or showing the end
result), content projects (e.g. a
theme you talk about for a few
days/weeks) and content
updates (small, daily updates
with relevant information).
2 Internal communication is not enough
Internal = External
3 Measure impact
To keep the collaboration flow going, there is need for evidence that the approach works. Therefore
we advise to use a number of clear success indicators that you can measure during the
implementation of structural collaboration in your organization. There is no standard list of KPIs
to use; they differ from company to company, as they are closely linked to the company culture and the
company‟s (long-term) objectives. There are a few KPIs that apply to all companies to follow up on the impact of
structural collaboration.
Success of innovation, impact of
communication and improvement of customer
service: by involving customers early in the
process, your company will take better decisions.
Product launches, new advertising campaigns and
so on should have a higher success rate than before
the collaboration was implemented.
Cost reduction: by integrating the voice of the
customer in the entire decision-making flow, the cost
of ad hoc market research should be reduced. Next
to that, by creating better products and services
based on the input of the market, the impact of
word-of-mouth will increase, which may lead to
lower media budgets.
Consumer feeling of the organization: you can
measure to what extent your management has a
better feeling of the attitude and behaviour of your
target market. The goal is that managers think as
consumers and improve their performance through
this newly acquired skill.
Brand perception: listening actively will humanise
your brand and make it more popular.
Define your KPIs, measure them and
celebrate success!
3 Measure impact
Need for changes in internal implementation
processes
Collaboration should lead to decisions that
are taken through a between the market and
your company. The proof of structural
collaboration is in the implementation of the ideas. In
order to succeed in this crucial step, there is a need
to change the internal decision streams. The
challenge is to integrate consumer feedback
and input into every phase of the decision
cycle. Remember that structural collaboration does
not come overnight. It starts with a try-out that fits
within the existing culture. Make sure that as from the
start you know what your next step will be.
In other words: it is important to start with a try-out,
but it is equally important to start with a long-term
view. Make sure you know where you're going. After
the try-out, it is a matter of including collaboration
into projects where the fit feels right. People
(internally and externally) get bored rapidly. Make
sure you have a flow ready in your collaboration
process to keep the conversations going. Plan with
room for flexibility. Once you have completed a
number of successful collaboration projects, the
possibility to move forward to structural collaboration
will arise.
Make sure that, along the way, you take into account
these last tactical tips to make collaboration work:
Have clear objectives for each collaboration project
Involve all stakeholders early in the process
Manage expectations
Have a community manager
Create internal and external credibility
1. Have clear objectives for each collaboration project. Make sure not to collaborate just for the sake of
it. To get the feedback of consumers in the decision flow, the objectives have to be very clear, and in line
with the business goals.
2. Involve all stakeholders early in the process. The higher the number of departments involved at the
beginning of the process, the better. In order to integrate the collaboration flow in the decision flow, it is
crucial to have a buy-in from the relevant teams.
3. Manage expectations. Collaboration won‟t lead to the next big idea for your company. Customers are
great sparring partners, but don‟t set your expectations too high. Make sure that during the integration of
their feedback in the decision flows, everybody is aware of what to expect from the collaboration.
4. Have a community manager. Make sure to have assigned somebody to manage the community. This
person is responsible for managing the conversation with participants in the collaboration process and for
sharing the insights internally. He or she brings the consumer‟s voice to life within the company.
5. Create internal and external credibility. By delivering results and integrating the voice of the customer
in your decision flows, you will gain credibility among the participants in the collaboration platform.
Credibility among employees will also grow as they will see that the collaboration adds value. Marketing
your collaboration efforts is not a bad thing, but it should not be the only thing.
Part 3 : Cases
In this last chapter, we demonstrate how we applied the above framework
for important players in the (financial) services sector. We report on 2
successful co-creation pilots in the telecom and aviation sector that -eventually-
resulted in a long-term connection between all parties involved. We also show how
the financial sector is gradually opening up and starting to implementing their first true
co-creation trajectories surfing the waves of social media and web 2.0.
Telenet is the largest provider of broadband cable services in Belgium. Its business comprises the provision of
analogue and digital cable television, high speed Internet and fixed & mobile telephony services. By launching a
new service in Beta and integrating the voice of the user in the further development, Telenet co-created unique
value with customers.
With the purpose of securing (1) market leadership and (2) first mover advantage, Telenet‟s mission
statement comprises “generate impact through happy clients spreading positive word-of-mouth”, turning the
ground swell phenomenon to their advantage. Therefore, they launched a new service in Beta and different
internal teams (R&D, marketing, communication, management, even de CEO, Duco himself) collaborated with a
user group in an online pre-launch community on the further development of this application.
During the official (press) launch of
Yelo, an application bringing
digital TV to mobile devices
like the iPhone, iPad and
(portable) computer, users were
invited to provide feedback on social
media. 100 participants were
recruited from the open community
to join a 3-week closed pre-launch
community to allow in-depth
discussion of the uncovered themes,
collaboration on improvements and
to structure the development
roadmap. After the community,
feedback was shared on social
media again, offering all users a
chance to join the dialogue.
By integrating the voice of the
customer in the development of this
new service, consumers were not
only collaborating on improvements,
they actually co-defined the
development roadmap and the
go-to-market strategy for the
following years.
This roadmap is structured around a
model generated by consumer
feedback, differentiating between
basic expectations, satisfying
improvements and addictive new
features. 30 out of 45 user-
generated and prioritized
improvements have already been
added to the roadmap, ranging from
bugs and interface changes to
content features. More than 50% of
the last update were user-generated
changes.
This co-creation approach
resulted in highly satisfied users,
with 83% being satisfied to
very satisfied, turning users
into real brand
ambassadors. About 1 out of 7
iPhone and iPad users in the
Belgian market installed Yelo.
Recently, similar co-creation
initiatives have been set up for a
large Belgian Bank and a
worldwide issuer of credit cards.
ING, a global financial institution of
Dutch origin, has the ambition to
become THE bank for students and
wants to have full understanding
of the life of students and their
banking needs.
In the 'ING Student House' community
the different marketing teams gained
insights into the daily life of 150
students by discussing, among
others, themes such as income,
expenditure, financial administration,
banking and insurances, during 3
months. The focus was on how ING
can add relevance to student
clients. In that perspective marketing
ideas were evaluated and co-created
with the students.
Barbera Van der Wal, Senior
Research Manager, ING retail: “Our
marketing challenge was to gain
experience with an online community
as a tool for structural collaboration
with key target groups. The goal was
to generate relevant customer insights
in the fuzzy front end of the innovation
funnel, to test marketing ideas and to
co-create with the target group”.
Eventually, the community provided
ING with a rich and detailed view
of the life of students nowadays.
In a closing workshop with the ING
Marketing-students team, over 100
(smaller and bigger) ideas were
generated to better match ING to the
needs and wishes of their student
clients. The NPD department now has
a clear view on the directions for the
development of the new student
positioning, and the community
provided them with a rich source of
customer quotes, brand reflections
and unsolicited feedback.
Susanne Streng, Segment Marketer,
ING retail: “For me the added value of
the collaboration project was not only
the concrete outcome, but also
installing a real dialogue with the
target and ACTING upon true
customer centricity. Engaging
customers in structural collaboration
is the ultimate brand touch-point
turning them into true brand
ambassadors”.
To further improve the experience of
travellers, Air France-KLM, the
French-Dutch airline holding
company, wanted to connect with
their customers on an emotional
level. Transfer flights in particular
are complex situations, evoking a lot
of emotions, mostly negative. To
approach this situation as an
opportunity and to demystify the
innovation process, InSites
Consulting and Air France-KLM
collaborated on a complete and
staged co-creation project,
centralised around the emotional
service perception. By connecting
with Air France and KLM frequent
flyers in an insightment community,
10 insight platforms were defined,
emphasizing their needs, emotions
and expectations.
In a second phase, another group of
frequent travellers placed the
insights into perspective with their
stories and came up with ideas on
the “My Transfer Idea” community, a
3-week creative journey. Analysis of
the ideas resulted in 32 concept
boards; the 4 most feasible were
integrated in a quantitative and
emotional concept screener.
This “My Transfer Idea” project does
not only use the emotional
experience of travellers as a starting
point for innovation in service
design, the emotional layer is
present in the complete
innovation approach and
connection with the frequent
flyers.
Also in the financial sector, a wide range of
target groups and business challenges have
been tackled by long-term customer
connections using online platforms:
- In the aftermath of the financial crisis, a 1-
year intensive collaboration process (via an
online community) was set up between
different internal teams (active involvement
of the CEO) and customers of 2 large
banks facing a merger. The goal was to
keep the finger on the pulse and generate
customer insights on the integration, so that
the teams could act upon them and control
damage or loss due to the fusion.
- With the purpose of better servicing their
autonomous investors, a large Belgian
retail bank installed a dedicated community
among autonomous investor customers and
account managers (with a sub-community
per profile).
Both groups were followed for 3 months, with a
meet & greet between the second and third
months. The results revealed different types of
autonomous investors embodying different
needs and insights on the dynamics between
the investors and account managers. In the
end, quick wins, short-term actions and
strategic projects towards the target group
were defined.
- Also in a more sensitive context, true
customer-centricity is key - nothing makes a
basher bash more than not being able to tell it
to your face - whether it is about how to
handle a compensation trajectory towards
investment customers or giving meaning to
your brand after re-branding.
Tom De Ruyck
@tomderuyck
http://www.linkedin.com/in/tomderuyck
+32 9 269 14 07
Delphine Vantomme
+32 9 269 15 20
Research team
http://www.linkedin.com/in/delphinevantomme
Want to know more about
research in the
financial sector?
+32 9 269 15 20
Delphine Vantomme Business Director Financial Services