how the new iso particle count standard will affect you

7/25/2019 How the New ISO Particle Count Standard Will Affect You

1/4

Current Issue

Archive

Subscribe

Search:

How the New ISO Particle Count

Standard Will Affect You

Leonard Bensch, Pall Corporation

Tags: particle counting, contamination control

ISO Revises Standards for Particle Counting and Reporting

Fluid contamination is a primary root cause of mechanical component wear and reduction in system reliability

and performance. Because of this, most companies have established programs to monitor and control

contamination. These programs include particle counting. Three new or revised ISO fluid power standards

will have a major impact on such programs. The changes are primarily the result of a new method for

calibrating liquid automatic particle counters (APCs) that is traceable to the National Institute of Standards

and Technology (NIST), but unfortunately produces a substantially different calibration. This article presents

an introduction to the new calibration method including the impact on resultant particle sizes, particle counts

and contamination classes.

AUTOMATIC PARTICLE COUNTER CALIBRATION

APCs have generally replaced optical microscopy as the primary method for quantifying particulate

contamination in fluid wetted systems. In the late 1960s a calibration procedure was developed to ensure that

particle counts obtained with an APC agreed as closely as possible with counts obtained by optical

microscopy. The method, using AC Fine Test Dust (ACFTD), ultimately became International Standard ISO

4402 [1], and is still in use today by most oil analysis laboratories around the world.

For some time, industry had been aware that when more sophisticated instruments such as scanning

electron microscopes are used to analyze the ACFTD, a substantial increase in the numbers o f particles

(especially below 10 m) are reported compared to the distribution based on optical microscopes, given in

ISO 4402. Also, in 1992, AC Rochester discontinued manufacturing ACFTD. Therefore National Fluid Power

Association (NFPA) and ISO standards committees began to develop a revised APC calibration method

based on a new contaminant whose particle size distribution could be NIST traceable. ISO 12103-A3 [2]

Medium Test Dust (ISO MTD) was selected as the best candidate. In 1993, NIST undertook an effort to certify

the particle size distribution of suspensions of ISO MTD as a reference material for APC calibration. This

effort resulted in NIST Standard Reference Material SRM 2806 consisting of a suspension of ISO MTD in

MIL-H-5606 hydraulic fluid. Their analyses show a significant difference in the particle size distribution of ISO

MTD as measured with an electron microscope compared to previous results with an APC calibrated per ISO

4402 (see Figure 1).

Figure 1shows significantly more particles at sizes below about 10 m were observed by NIST than with theACFTD calibration. The higher particle counts are a result of the enhanced sensitivity of scanning electron

microscopy when compared to optical microscopy performed in the 1960s. At sizes larger than 10 m, fewer

particles were observed by NIST. This is primarily because NIST reported the projected area equivalent

spherical diameter of particles, which is smaller than the longest chord dimension used to generate the

published ACFTD size distribution. The two methods intersect around the 10 m level.

ISO has updated the current APC calibration procedure to use the SRM 2806. The revised method was

approved on December 9, 1999, as ISO/FDIS 11171 [3]. This calibration procedure includes many other

enhancements to ensure better resolution, accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility; however, the effect of

the new ISO MTD dust and NIST counts will have the largest impact. Also, a new designation, m(c) is

recommended for reporting particle sizes using the new ISO 11171 procedure, with the (c) referring to

certified sizes traceable to NIST, so that the results are easily distinguished from those obtained with ISO

4402.

Related Articles

Particle Counting - Peril or Prize?

Advice for Measuring Oil Filter Life

Identifying Turbine Oil Cleanliness Levels

Value of Particle Counting in Oil Analysis

Home | Buyers Guide | Glossary | Events | Bookstore | Newsletters | Browse Topics

GREASES HYDRAULICS INDUSTRIAL LUBRICANTS SYNTHETICS FILTRATION STORAGE/HANDLING OIL ANALYSIS

Tweet Like 2 Share

the New ISO Particle Count Standard Will Affect You http://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/12/iso-parti

7/2/2016


2/4

ISO has also developed a new procedure, ISO 11943 [4], for calibration and verification of online particle

counting and dilution systems. ISO 11943 is applied to online particle counters used for contamination

analysis of operating systems in the field as well as filter test systems.

REDEFINITION OF PARTICLE SIZES

Based on the size distribution of ISO MTD in Figure 1, for particle sizes below about 10 m, the particle size

determined by NIST for a given particle count is greater than the corresponding particle size per ISO 4402.

The difference between the methods increases as the particle size decreases. For example, the particle

count for 1 m (ISO 4402 calibration) of about 2000 particles/g corresponds to a particle size of 4.2 m(c)

(NIST size distribution). Thus, below about 10 m, particle sizes with NIST (ISO 11171) calibration will appear

higher than the old definition (ISO 4402), e.g., 2 m is 4.6 m(c) and 5 m is 6.4 m(c). Above about 10 m,

the opposite relationship exists; new particle sizes will appear lower than the old definition, e.g., 15 m is

about 13.6 m(c). The relationship between particle sizes defined by the ISO 4402 and NIST size

distributions for ISO MTD is shown in Table 1. Note that these changes will not impact particle counts

obtained with optical microscopy, as these counting methods have not changed.

Because of possible differences between automatic particle counters and the accuracy of their original APC

calibration, these relationships may vary slightly and must be determined for each APC to be used. It should

also be noted that even though a particle size or count may change because of the new calibration, the actual

contamination level in a system will not be influenced and will remain the same.

IMPACT OF NEW CALIBRATION ON PARTICLE COUNTS

Particle counts obtained with an APC calibrated with the new ISO 11171 procedure will differ from the

corresponding particle counts obtained with the APC calibrated per ISO 4402 at any particular size. Users of

particle count data must be made aware of the APC calibration method and how to interpret results when

using the new calibration method. As a first approximation, historical automatic particle count data may be

converted from ISO 4402 sizes to the new NIST sizes using Table 1.

The values in Table 2illustrate the effect of the two calibration procedures on particle counts. As shown in the

table, if one changes from ISO 4402 to the new ISO 11171 calibration without making adjustments to the

sizes being monitored, significant differences arise in particle concentrations. For particle sizes smaller than

about 10 m, apparent increases in particle concentration will be reported which could prompt unnecessary

action. The magnitude of the difference increases with decreasing particle size. For sizes larger than 10 m,

the reverse occurs and apparent decreases in concentration result from the new calibration. Failure to

recognize this variation as the result of a change in calibration, rather than a change in contamination level,

may lead to misinterpretation of particle count data and inappropriate action.

CHANGES TO THE ISO CODE

On December 2, 1999, ISO approved modifications to the ISO 4406 coding method based on the new

calibration procedure. For APC counts, the revised procedure, ISO FDIS 4406.2 [5], uses three code

numbers, corresponding to the concentrations of particles larger than 4 m(c), 6 m(c) and 14 m(c) with the

new calibration method. The new 6 m(c) and 14 m(c) sizes correspond closely to ISO 4402 sizes of 5 mand 15 m (see Table 1). These sizes were chosen so that no significant shift in code number occurs due to

changes in the APC calibration method. For optical microscopy the calibration is unchanged and the two

digits will remain the same as before at 5 m and 15 m. Thus, the second two digits of the actual code will

be similar regardless of the calibration or measurement technique used.

In some instances, companies had previously adopted for their own use a 3-digit form of the ISO 4406 code

with the third digit representing 2 m. For these companies the change to three digits used in the new ISO

4406:1999 will be relatively easy because the second two digits will typically remain the same as before (only

the particle sizes are adjusted). Because the first digit for the new code will represent 4 m(c) rather than 4.6

m(c) which more closely corresponds to the old 2 m, an increase in the particle count and ISO code for this

digit may be noticed. As a rule of thumb, specifications should be increased in the first digit by about 1 code

level with the second two digits remaining unchanged. For example, a specification of 17/15/12 based on 2,

5, and 15 m (ACFTD calibration) should be changed to ISO 18/15/12 based on 4, 6, and 14 m(c) (NIST

calibration).

Figure 2reflects the impact on the ISO 4406 code for automatic particle counts conducted on two typical fluid

samples. Note that for the new NIST calibration per ISO 11171, the cleanliness classes are determined by

particle counts > 4, 6, and 14 m(c). In each case, the second two digits of the code are nearly identical to

the previous ISO 4406 2-digit code. Indeed, differences only result when observed particle concentrations

correspond to transitions between two code numbers. As a result of the change in size classes with the

revised code, the ISO code designation for a particular sample will not change appreciably, regardless of

whether the new or old calibration method is used. This permits equipment users and others who specify

cleanliness levels in terms of an ISO code to maintain their historical databases and their existing cleanliness

specifications without change.

Changes In NAS 1638 - In order to implement the new NIST calibration with minimal impact on NAS

cleanliness classes, it has been proposed to revise the reference particle size ranges in NAS 1638 [6] based

on the particle size relationship in Table 1; therefore, the actual particle sizes measured would be similar

White Papers

Controlling Gearbox Lubricant Contamination

Buyers Guide

Oil Analysis Laboratories

Oil Analysis Instruments

Oil Sampling Hardware

Poll

Have you used the ISO

cleanliness code to set target

alarms for system

cleanliness?

Yes

No


7/2/2016


3/4

regardless of the method of calibration.

As an example, 5 m per ISO 4402 calibration is replaced with 6 m(c) per NIST calibration. Because optical

microscopic particle counting procedures are not being changed, no changes are required in the cleanliness

standards provided the size ranges counted correspond to the original size ranges set by the standards. In

addition to the change in particle size, it has also been proposed that NAS 1638 be changed to utilize

cumulative particle counts.

Table 3shows the changes proposed in the NAS 1638 cleanliness classes for APC analysis. It should be

noted that, because the first size range has been extended to 1 m or 4 m(c), new contamination limits are

included.

CONCLUSIONS

Three new or revised ISO standards will have an impact on particle counting and reporting standards - ISO

11171, ISO 11943 and ISO 4406. The new APC calibration method, ISO 11171, utilizes NIST certified

calibration samples, instead of obsolete ACFTD. ISO 11943 for online APC calibration is based on the

revised calibration method and validates the entire on-line particle counting system, including a dilution

system when used. ISO 4406, the revised solid contamination level code, uses the new calibration method

and adds a third size, 4 m(c), to the code for APC results. Sizes for the revised code were chosen to allow

users of the code to retain their historical data base and leave cleanliness level specifications based on the

code unchanged.

The adoption and implementation of these new and revised international standards will cause the following to

occur:

Apparent particle sizes when using an APC calibrated per ISO 11171 will change;

Particle counts when using an APC calibrated with ISO 11171 will change;

Cleanliness codes will change unless APC reported particle sizes are adjusted in accordance with the

revised ISO 4406:1999 or the proposed revised NAS 1638.

The projected changes in each of these parameters have been discussed in this

paper. Users should always keep in mind that any reported changes are an artifact

of the methods utilized and actual contamination levels will remain the same as

before.

REFERENCES

1) ISO 4402, Hydraulic fluid power - Calibration of automatic-count instruments for particles suspended in

liquids - Method using classified AC Fine Test Dust contaminant, 1991.

2) ISO 12103, Road vehicles - Test dust for filter evaluation - Part 1: Arizona test dust, 1997.

3) ISO FDIS 11171, Hydraulic fluid power Calibration of liquid automatic particle counters, 1999.

4) ISO 11943, Hydraulic fluid power - on-line liquid automatic particle-counting systems - Methods of

calibration and validation, 1999.

5) ISO FDIS 4406.2, Hydraulic fluid power - Fluids - Code for defining the level of contamination of solid

particles, 1999.

6) NAS 1638, Cleanliness Requirements of Parts Used in Hydraulics Systems, 1992.

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Dr. Leonard Bensch

Vice President, Pall Corporation

25 Harbor Park Drive

Port Washington, NY 11050

Phone: 516-484-3600


7/2/2016


4/4

Practicing Oil Analysis(5/2000)

Related Articles

Particle Counting - Peril or Prize?

Advice for Measuring Oil Filter Life

Identifying Turbine Oil Cleanliness Levels

Value of Particle Counting in Oil Analysis

Get 60 Questions to Ask Your Lubricant

Supplierabsolutely FREE when you sign up

for our free Lube-Tips newsletter. Email:

Oil Analysis BasicsPresents the fundamentals of oil analysis for

machinery condition monitoring in an easy to

understand format. Learn everything from how to

take a proper oil sample to how to select a test slate

for your applications.

Table of Contents| Read Excerpts

Machinery Oil AnalysisPresents the practice of oil analysis as a condition

monitoring tool for machines. Covers each step in

the sampling, testing and diagnostic process.

Includes latest advances in technology and

instrumentation.

Table of Contents| Read Excerpts

Services Subscribe | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | RSS | Advertise

Quick Links Home | Buyers Guide | Glossary | Events | Bookstore | Newsletters | Browse Topics

NORIA CORPORATION MACHINERY LUBRICATION | RELIABLE PLANT


7/2/2016

how the new iso particle count standard will affect you

Documents