Copyright Minemax 1998-2017

How to Model Alternative Material Destinations in

Minemax Scheduler

How to Model Alternative Material Destinations in Minemax Scheduler 2

The traditional way of modelling material destinations in a strategic mine plan is to pre-determine the

material paths when preparing the model. For example, in a gold mine project, we pre-define the

destination of blocks with higher grades to be a Carbon in Pulp (CIP) mill and the destination of blocks

with lower grades to be a heap leach (HL) dump. We also have an economic cut-off grade set up so

blocks with grades lower than the cut-off grade are sent to the waste dump.

But the best option is not always obvious at the start and we may be able to realize more value

by considering all possible options. We can do this by letting our schedule optimization software

determine the material destinations. With this approach, you might see high grade material

going to HL instead of CIP. This is because the CIP is at capacity with other blocks which have a

higher grade.

In this short how-to article, we’ll show you how to use Minemax Scheduler to model alternative

decisions that will treat material destinations as an output of the scheduling process so we can

consider all the possible options for our project.

Modeling Predetermined Destinations

Let’s start with a model of a traditional gold mine that includes CIP, HL and a waste dump

destinations. The destinations are pre-determined by defining them as mining processes on the

Define screen and then mapping them to defined values on the Mappings screen.

How to Model Alternative Material Destinations in Minemax Scheduler 3

On the Mappings screen, the CIP, HL and waste destinations (CIP_Ore, HL_Ore, Waste) are

mapped to process ratios with values ranging between 0 and 1 depending on the material

grade. Process ratios are then multiplied by the mass of each block to give the total quantity of

material from the block that is sent to the destination. Let’s look at process ratio values for a

sample block with 10,000 tonnes:

How to Model Alternative Material Destinations in Minemax Scheduler 4

Au ≥ 0.5 CIP_Ratio = 1 , HL_Ratio = 0 , WasteRatio = 0 CIP Ore Block Mass = 10,000 tonnes

0.2 < Au < 0.5 CIP_Ratio = 0, HL_Ratio =1, WasteRatio = 0 HL Ore Block Mass = 10,000 tonnes

Au ≤ 0.2 CIP_Ratio = 0, HL_Ratio =0, WasteRatio = 1 Waste Block Mass = 10,000 tonnes

When we optimize the model in Minemax Scheduler considering financials, precedences and

constraints, we get a schedule with the total NPV of $5,886,137,454 satisfying processing

constraints for the CIP and HP plants as shown below.

Modeling Alternative Destinations

Now we’ll clone the project and go back to the model definition to set up alternative decisions

to determine material destinations as an output of the optimization process.

In Minemax Scheduler, we can do this by following these easy steps:

1. On the Define screen in the Processes section, change the process type from ‘mining’ to

‘downstream’ for the processing destinations CIP_Ore and HL_Ore .

2. On the same screen, create a new ‘downstream’ waste destination Waste_Ore. The last

default Waste process in the list is only used for pre-determined waste which we don’t

have in this example.

How to Model Alternative Material Destinations in Minemax Scheduler 5

3. In the Process Links section, create process links to define the logical relationships

between destinations using a decision tree diagram.

How to Model Alternative Material Destinations in Minemax Scheduler 6

4. On the Mappings screen, map all three destinations CIP_Ore, Leach_Ore and

Waste_Ore to the ‘OreRatio’ process ratio which is set to 1. This means that it is

possible for each block to go to any of these three destinations.

How to Model Alternative Material Destinations in Minemax Scheduler 7

5. Click the Import button to import the new model definition so we can move on to the

schedule optimization.

Scheduling with Alternative Decisions

During the optimization, Minemax Scheduler decides when each block is mined based on

financials, precedences and constraints. When alternative decisions are used in the project,

decisions as to when each block is mined and where it is going are considered within the same

optimization run.

For our example, the resulting schedule with alternative decisions gives the total NPV of

$6,372,484,922 which is an improvement of more than $486m over the previous schedule.

The Attribute Table report below shows that the optimal cut-off grades for CIP, HL, and Waste

destinations are not fixed, but they change over time to produce the best high-value schedule

possible. To achieve this, the CIP and HL plants also process various grades (highlighted in red)

with values above or below the pre-determined cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t set up in the first

scenario.

How to Model Alternative Material Destinations in Minemax Scheduler 8

Summary

In this short article you have seen an easy, yet valuable way of modelling alternative

destinations in your strategic mine plan. By integrating the decisions about material

destinations into your schedule optimization, and by treating them as an output rather than an

input, you are able to produce a practical schedule with a significantly greater value for your

project or operation.

Alternative decisions in Minemax Scheduler have many different applications, from the simple

example shown today to far more complex models including decisions for trucking routes,

alternative products, and processing methods.

Author: Martina Brayford

If you’d like to know more about Minemax Scheduler, you can download Minemax Scheduler

Viewer and explore some more examples.

If you’d like to discuss how to use alternative decisions in your specific situation, contact us.