hp strategies for system alignment and renewal

1
2 Performance Improvement, vol. 48, no. 1, January 2009 ©2009 International Society for Performance Improvement Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/pfi.20041 EDITOR’S NOTES HP STRATEGIES FOR SYSTEM ALIGNMENT AND RENEWAL Holly Burkett, CPT HAPPY NEW YEAR! As we begin 2009 with a focus on resolutions geared towards personal and profes- sional improvement, it seems fitting to start our first issue of the year with an important, timely feature about system renewal and adaptability. Specifically, Nicholas Andreadis presents a conceptualization of the organization as one large, organic “processing unit” whose primary purpose is to create valuable products and services through a series of interdependent and linked work processes. Andreadis presents a systems framework with distinct subsystems: governance, management, work, and people. Each subsystem is unique unto itself with overlapping, interdependent inputs, outputs, and consequences. The author asserts that high-performing organizations are characterized by the purpose- ful behavior and adaptability of its systems, subsystems, processes, and behavior, and he encourages human performance technology (HPT) professionals to periodically assess all organizational systems for alignment and renewal. In the spirit of applying a systems framework, Mike Kolich describes a case study showing how a Canadian automotive company used audit measures to address deficien- cies in its human resource management system and fulfill its mission of being a global leader in people development, quality execution, and consumer value. The author’s sys- temic approach for increasing the linkage of the company’s performance management system to organizational mission, values, and strategic objectives has broad implications for the implementation of any performance improvement initiative. Joel Gendelman furthers the case for strategic alignment by offering a process to increase the alignment of instructional curricula with defined business needs. This process is intended to help practitioners increase their responsiveness, reduce curricu- lum acquisition and development costs, and better support current business initiatives. Donald Tosti closes this issue by challenging HPT professionals to focus on business and cultural alignment by asking, “What kind of culture do we need to ensure that we can deliver the value we promise to our customers?” Tosti reminds practitioners that at their most fundamental level, all organizations are human behavioral systems, and any systematic approach needs to pay special attention to the people who must deliver on the brand promise of that organization. In looking for ways to add value-added services, professionals must continually assess performance-based processes, programs, and prod- ucts in terms of usefulness and the customer’s total experience with the product or ser- vice. That is, does it help people make more effective decisions or take more effective action? Along that vein, we hope that your total experience with Performance Improvement will be a useful one in 2009 and that the lessons learned from our lineup of authors will add value to the performance improvement decisions and actions you take in the year ahead. [email protected] INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT OFFICERS Matt Peters, President Darlene Van Tiem, President-elect Jeanne Farrington, Past President Timm Esque, Director Mary Norris Thomas, Director Paul Cook, Director David Hartt, Director Steven Kelly, Director April Syring Davis, Executive Director PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT EDITORIAL GROUP April Syring Davis, Publisher Holly Burkett, Editor John Y. Chen, Publications Manager INTERNATIONAL MARKETING Kinam Sung, Korea EDITORIAL, ADVERTISING, AND MEMBERSHIP OFFICE International Society for Performance Improvement 1400 Spring Street, Suite 260 Silver Spring, MD 20910 Phone 301-587-8570 Fax 301-587-8573 Performance Improvement (formerly Performance & Instruction) (ISSN: 1090-8811, electronic ISSN: 1930-8272) is published monthly except for combined May/June and November/December issues by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., a Wiley Company. Copyright © 2009, International Society for Performance Improvement. All rights reserved. Periodicals Postage Paid at Hoboken, NJ, and additional mailing offices. Subscriptions: $75 for individuals and $299 for institutions in the U.S. For all subscription inquiries contact: Wiley Periodicals, Inc., 989 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103-1741. Phone: 888-378-2537 (toll-free); 415-433-1767 (toll call). Fax: 888-481-2665 (toll-free); 415-951-8553 (toll number). Email: [email protected]. Postmaster: Send address changes to the subscription address above. Performance Improvement is com- mitted to presenting multiple voices and perspectives related to the prac- tice of human performance technol- ogy. Opinions of the authors do not necessarily represent the beliefs of ISPI or the editor.

Upload: holly-burkett

Post on 06-Jul-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

2

Performance Improvement, vol. 48, no. 1, January 2009©2009 International Society for Performance ImprovementPublished online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) • DOI: 10.1002/pfi.20041

ED I TOR ’S NOTES

HP STRATEGIES FOR SYSTEMALIGNMENT AND RENEWAL

Holly Burkett, CPT

HAPPY NEW YEAR! As we begin 2009 with a focus on resolutions geared towards personal and profes-

sional improvement, it seems fitting to start our first issue of the year with an important,timely feature about system renewal and adaptability. Specifically, Nicholas Andreadispresents a conceptualization of the organization as one large, organic “processing unit”whose primary purpose is to create valuable products and services through a series ofinterdependent and linked work processes. Andreadis presents a systems framework withdistinct subsystems: governance, management, work, and people. Each subsystem isunique unto itself with overlapping, interdependent inputs, outputs, and consequences.The author asserts that high-performing organizations are characterized by the purpose-ful behavior and adaptability of its systems, subsystems, processes, and behavior, and heencourages human performance technology (HPT) professionals to periodically assessall organizational systems for alignment and renewal.

In the spirit of applying a systems framework, Mike Kolich describes a case studyshowing how a Canadian automotive company used audit measures to address deficien-cies in its human resource management system and fulfill its mission of being a globalleader in people development, quality execution, and consumer value. The author’s sys-temic approach for increasing the linkage of the company’s performance managementsystem to organizational mission, values, and strategic objectives has broad implicationsfor the implementation of any performance improvement initiative.

Joel Gendelman furthers the case for strategic alignment by offering a process toincrease the alignment of instructional curricula with defined business needs. Thisprocess is intended to help practitioners increase their responsiveness, reduce curricu-lum acquisition and development costs, and better support current business initiatives.

Donald Tosti closes this issue by challenging HPT professionals to focus on businessand cultural alignment by asking, “What kind of culture do we need to ensure that wecan deliver the value we promise to our customers?” Tosti reminds practitioners that attheir most fundamental level, all organizations are human behavioral systems, and anysystematic approach needs to pay special attention to the people who must deliver on thebrand promise of that organization. In looking for ways to add value-added services,professionals must continually assess performance-based processes, programs, and prod-ucts in terms of usefulness and the customer’s total experience with the product or ser-vice. That is, does it help people make more effective decisions or take more effectiveaction?

Along that vein, we hope that your total experience with Performance Improvementwill be a useful one in 2009 and that the lessons learned from our lineup of authors willadd value to the performance improvement decisions and actions you take in the yearahead.

[email protected]

INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTOFFICERS

Matt Peters, PresidentDarlene Van Tiem, President-electJeanne Farrington, Past PresidentTimm Esque, DirectorMary Norris Thomas, DirectorPaul Cook, DirectorDavid Hartt, DirectorSteven Kelly, DirectorApril Syring Davis, Executive Director

PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTEDITORIAL GROUPApril Syring Davis, PublisherHolly Burkett, EditorJohn Y. Chen, Publications Manager

INTERNATIONAL MARKETINGKinam Sung, Korea

EDITORIAL, ADVERTISING, ANDMEMBERSHIP OFFICEInternational Society for Performance Improvement1400 Spring Street, Suite 260Silver Spring, MD 20910Phone 301-587-8570Fax 301-587-8573

Performance Improvement (formerly Performance & Instruction) (ISSN: 1090-8811, electronic ISSN:1930-8272) is published monthly except for combined May/June andNovember/December issues by WileyPeriodicals, Inc., a Wiley Company.

Copyright © 2009, International Society for Performance Improvement. All rights reserved.

Periodicals Postage Paid at Hoboken,NJ, and additional mailing offices.

Subscriptions: $75 for individuals and $299 for institutions in the U.S.For all subscription inquiries contact:Wiley Periodicals, Inc., 989 MarketStreet, San Francisco, CA 94103-1741.Phone: 888-378-2537 (toll-free);415-433-1767 (toll call).Fax: 888-481-2665 (toll-free);415-951-8553 (toll number).Email: [email protected].

Postmaster: Send address changes to the subscription address above.

Performance Improvement is com-mitted to presenting multiple voices and perspectives related to the prac-tice of human performance technol-ogy. Opinions of the authors do notnecessarily represent the beliefs ofISPI or the editor.