hsc regeneration forum - 2016 · quantitative strategic planning matrix (qspm) legend: as t...
TRANSCRIPT
1. Context a) Background b) 10-Year Housing Plan
Change Drivers Service System Management
2. Partnerships and Projects
a) 3P b) Examples of Affordable Developments c) Service
3. Moving Forward
a) Long-Term Affordable Housing Strategy b) Entrepreneurship in Service Delivery c) Risk Management
1. Background Service Manager ◦ Administer funding for 1,000 non-profit and co-
operative units
Cochrane District Local Housing Corporation ◦ 1,292 units ◦ Affordable Housing Development Entity
Who do we house ◦ 70% of portfolio is geared to seniors ◦ large number of tenants require supports ◦ ~1,200 waiting to be housed
Process Consultations
Data
Analysis Market Conditions
Affordability
Stock
Conclusions Service System Mgmt
Recommendations Partnerships
Development
Service
“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. [It] provides the opportunity for us to do things you could not do before.
– Rahm Emmanuel
Source and rally partners ◦ 10-Year Plan
◦ Project specific – demand quantification
◦ Service accountability
Organizational transformation ◦ Operations
◦ Governance
◦ Marketing
System Transformation ◦ Non-traditional partners
Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) Legend: AS – Attractiveness Score TAS – Total Attractiveness Score 1 = not acceptable, 2 = possibly acceptable, 3 = probably acceptable, 4 = most acceptable
Strategic Alternatives
3P Design / Bid / Build
Key Factors Weight AS TAS AS TAS
Strengths
Market knowledge .05 2 0.1 3 0.15
Connections – Industry and Municipal .10 4 0.4 2 0.2
Available Funding .10 3 0.3 1 0.1
Borrowing Power .15 4 0.6 3 0.45
Equity availability .10 3 0.3 3 0.3
Weaknesses
Internal capacity (planning, legal, etc.) .10 1 0.1 3 0.3
Development experience .10 2 0.2 2 0.2
Low risk tolerance .15 3 0.45 2 0.3
Ministry / legislative / Sector restrictions .10 1 0.1 2 0.2
Complexity .05 1 0.05 3 0.15
1.0
Opportunities
High demand .10 2 0.2 3 0.3
Stakeholder support .10 - - - -
Low interest rates .15 - - - -
Alternative construction options .05 - - - -
Inactive Development Market .05 3 0.15 2 0.1
Threats
Property Availability .10 3 0.3 4 0.4
Population outmigration .10 - - - -
Competition .05 4 0.2 3 0.15
Marketability – vac loss .10 3 0.3 2 0.2
Cost of Construction .20 3 0.6 2 0.4
Sum Total Attractiveness Score 1.0 4.25 3.75
Integrations Strategies ◦ Forward / Backward / Horizontal
Intensive Strategies ◦ Market Penetration / Market Development / Product
Development
Diversification Strategies ◦ Concentric / Horizontal / Conglomerate
Defensive Strategies ◦ Retrenchment / Divestiture / Liquidation
Generic Strategies ◦ Cost Leadership / Differentiation / Focus / Value Chain
Life is full of lousy options. – Gen. P.X. Kelley
Combination Strategies ◦ Joint Venture / Mergers
When a crisis forces choosing among alternatives, most people will choose the worse possible one. – Rudin’s Law
What did we do? ◦ Created the mechanism (entity) to develop affordable
units and / or generate revenue to be invested in developing affordable units.
Why did we do it? ◦ Declining federal and provincial funds ◦ Too much pressure on municipal funds ◦ Critical need in northern municipalities
Where are we now? ◦ Projects in progress ◦ Steep learning curve (financing, project mgmt., etc.) ◦ Sourcing partners to ensure tenancy security ◦ Charitable status
Service Managers – Housing, Employment, EMS
Health – Service Providers, Hospitals, Primary Care
Education – Secondary / Post-secondary
Municipalities – Planning / Economic Development
Private Sector – Developers / Service providers
Target Population Service Agencies – Aboriginal, Seniors, Victims of Domestic Violence, Youth
Homelessness Prevention Services
Project Details
Cochrane Seniors • 32 units • Bedroom mix = bach to 2 • Kitchen services • Environmental services
286 Randall • Single-detached home • Renovated to 4 bedroom + 1
office • Market rent • Transitional living for targeted
population
Opasatika School Conversion • Partnership between municipality, CSCDGR, and CDSSAB
• Potential for 10 to 12 seniors units
Project Details
Kapuskasing • Seniors development – TBD
• School reno family development - TBD
Smooth Rock Falls • Seniors development – TBD
Hearst • Seniors development – TBD
Caring Community Housing Collaborative
• Coalition of health service providers and CDSSAB to create common service delivery space, transitional housing, and permanent housing
Project Details
Iroquois Falls Supported Seniors
• 10 units (single storey townhouse) • 2 bedrooms • Slab on grade • Capital partnership between
CDSSAB. NE LHIN, Town of I.F. • Remaining capital financed via I.O.
545 Couture (Timmins) • Semi-detached home • 3 bedrooms • Internally financed
45 Laurier (Timmins) • Single-detached home • 3 bedrooms • Internally financed
35 Dwyer (Schumacher) • 6-plex • 1, 2, and 3 bedroom mix • Market rent • Investment in affordable housing
program and internal finance combo
Long-Term Affordable Housing Strategy Renewal ◦ CHPI
Homelessness as loss-leader investment
ROI
◦ Poverty Reduction Strategy and Supportive Housing
◦ Investment in Affordable Housing Program ◦ HSA – enabling legislation
Then
Landlord
Funding administrator
Access administrator
Now • Service System Mgr. • Landlord • Funding Administrator • Access Administrator • Property Developer • Property Manager • Service Provider • Economic Development
Driver • Employment Developer
Reconcile need and demand - affordable unit development (space, single storey vs. multi level)
Financing – complexity and replicability
Entrepreneurial Culture
Governance
New enterprise:
•Development
corporations, property
management services
•Partnerships, alliances
Leveraging assets:
•Redevelopment, land
banks, market sales
•Northern Bond,
Canadian Housing Bank
Scale Up:
•Merge, acquire,
capitalize on scale
Run it like a
business
•Foster innovation
•Entrepreneurship: Can
YOU handle it?
Incremental: small improvements
over time; e.g., process
improvements, operational
efficiencies
• Encourage creativity • Rethinking rules • Failure is okay • Manage risk
Fostering Entrepreneurship
Disruptive: transformative, system
change, new business models, new
markets; e.g., Facebook, Amazon,
AirBnB, Uber
Less Risk
More Risk
Supported living vs. Assisted Living
Secure partnerships in advance
Clarify service definitions
Account for delivery capacity by municipality
Reconcile fee for service with cost inclusion – in affordable context
Balancing immediate need of affordability with long term capital requirements
Change with environment ◦ Flexibility (in-house skills
supported with labour service contracts)
◦ Meet current demand
◦ Save operational dollars
◦ Expand business lines and market services
Insulate against future risk
Alice said, “Would you please tell me which way to go from here?” The cat said, “That depends on where you want to get to.” – Lewis Carroll
1 DSSAB and 12 member municipalities are capable of some good things
10 DSSABs and 110 Cities, Towns, and municipalities are capable of great things
No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it. – Albert Einstein
$$$ Capacity and Infrastructure o Garage, storage, etc.
Risk o liability (slip and falls, property damage) o Costs – equipment depreciation and wear o Human resources
Service Labour relations o Union environment
Vendor relationships o Eliminating one line of service can threaten other lines
Sustainability / Scalability
Brian Marks ◦ Director, Housing Services
There are risks and costs to a program of action. But they are far less than the long-range risks and costs of comfortable inaction. - JFK