hse design engineering tutorial

122
© 2015 – Hervé Baron HERVE BARON Engineering Training Welcome to this presentation. It is part of a suite of Engineering training modules. It shows the activities and deliverables of the Design Safety & Environment (HSE) discipline. Comments are most welcome ([email protected]), which I will incorporate for the benefit of all. Please download this file so that you can see my trainer’s notes in the top left corner – latest Acrobat Pro feature. Hervé

Upload: h-g-baron

Post on 14-Jul-2015

2.209 views

Category:

Education


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Engineering Training

Welcome to this presentation.

It is part of a suite of Engineering training modules.

It shows the activities and deliverables of the Design Safety & Environment (HSE) discipline.

Comments are most welcome ([email protected]), which I will incorporate for the benefit of all.

Please download this file so that you can see my trainer’s notes in the top left corner – latest Acrobat Pro feature.

Hervé

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Engineering disciplines: activities and deliverables

PROCESS

PLANT LAYOUT

EQUIPMENT

SAFETY & ENVIRONMENT

CIVIL

PIPING

PIPELINE

INSTRUMENTATION

ELECTRICAL

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety

The “Design Safety” discipline is to safeguard against the PLANT hazards.

Where does PLANT hazard come from? Loss of containment

Which are the two ways Design Safety can safeguard against loss of containment?

Reduce possibility

Minimize effect

Give some examples of each

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety

The “Design Safety” discipline is to safeguard against the PLANT hazards.

Where does PLANT hazard come from? Loss of containment

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety

The “Design Safety” discipline is to safeguard against the PLANT hazards.

Where does PLANT hazard come from? Loss of containment

Which are the two ways Design Safety can safeguard against loss of containment?

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety

The “Design Safety” discipline is to safeguard against the PLANT hazards.

Where does PLANT hazard come from? Loss of containment

Which are the two ways Design Safety can safeguard against loss of containment?

Reduce possibility

Minimize effect

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety

The “Design Safety” discipline is to safeguard against the PLANT hazards.

Where does PLANT hazard come from? Loss of containment

Which are the two ways Design Safety can safeguard against loss of containment?

Reduce likelihood

Minimize effect

How?

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety

The “Design Safety” discipline is to safeguard against the PLANT hazards.

Where does PLANT hazard come from? Loss of containment

Which are the two ways Design Safety can safeguard against loss of containment?

Reduce likelihood • QA and QC during design and construction • Detection of plant upsets • Overpressure protection • Pipes to be protected against mechanical failure as a result of vibration • Correct fail-safe position of control elements • Pipes to be sized to avoid hammering and surge • Minimize number of flanges • Explosion protection of Electrical Equipment and Instruments • Specify adequate Safety Integrity Level for Safety Automated Functions

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety

The “Design Safety” discipline is to safeguard against the PLANT hazards.

Where does PLANT hazard come from? Loss of containment

Which are the two ways Design Safety can safeguard against loss of containment?

Reduce likelihood

Minimize effect

How?

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety

The “Design Safety” discipline is to safeguard against the PLANT hazards.

Where does PLANT hazard come from? Loss of containment

Which are the two ways Design Safety can safeguard against loss of containment?

Reduce likelihood

Minimize effect • PLANT layout: isolation of ignition/leak sources, spacing between units

and equipment, bounding of liquid storage • Adequate personnel escape ways • Fire protection and fighting • Fire and Gas Detection and alarm • ESD system to isolate and depressurize

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety

The “Design Safety” discipline is to safeguard against the PLANT hazards.

Where does PLANT hazard come from? Loss of containment

Which are the two ways Design Safety can safeguard against loss of containment?

Reduce possibility

Minimize effect

The different areas of involvement of Design Safety are defined in the Design Safety Philosophy, also called “Safety Concept”.

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety

The “Design Safety” discipline is to safeguard against the PLANT hazards.

Where does PLANT hazard come from? Loss of containment

Which are the two ways Design Safety can safeguard against loss of containment?

Reduce possibility

Minimize effect

The different areas of involvement of Design Safety are defined in the Design Safety Philosophy, also called “Safety Concept”.

This presentation of the discipline will follow the table of content of this document

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety Philosophy / Safety Concept

HAZARD Identification

Risk assessment

PLANT Layout

Process Safety Systems

Fire protection & Fire fighting

Fire & Gas Detection

Hazardous area classification

Escape, Evacuation

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety Philosophy / Safety Concept

HAZARD Identification

Risk assessment

PLANT Layout

Process Safety Systems

Fire protection & Fire fighting

Fire & Gas Detection

Hazardous area classification

Escape, Evacuation

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety Philosophy / Safety Concept

HAZARD Identification • General Hazards • Process related hazards

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety Philosophy / Safety Concept

HAZARD Identification • General Hazards • Process related hazards

How are PLANT general hazards identified?

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

HAZard IDentification (HAZID)

A structured, key word based Qualitative risk identification and analysis methodology

Risk (to personnel safety, environment, assets) resulting from accident – normal operation excluded

Using check-lists enables a systematic screening.

Guided team brainstorming activity that benefits from the broad experience of a multidisciplinary team.

The result of the review is documented in a table where potential hazards, corresponding causes, consequences and associated safeguards are reported.

When necessary actions are formulated and followed-up

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

HAZard IDentification (HAZID) GUIDEWORDS

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Vicinity of motorway = ignition source Plant near KAUST: built in a wady!

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

HAZard IDentification (HAZID)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Vicinity of motorway = ignition source Plant near KAUST: built in a wady!

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

HAZard IDentification (HAZID) Output

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Other examples: leakage of product at bottom part of the column which is above its auto-ignition temperature Overpressure due to change of viscosity following loss of heat tracing Example of recommendation: DBB on toxic services

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety Philosophy / Safety Concept

HAZARD Identification • General Hazards • Process related hazards

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety Philosophy / Safety Concept

HAZARD Identification • General Hazards • Process related hazards

How are process hazards identified?

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Hazard and Operability Review (HAZOP)

What is a HAZOP?

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Hazard and Operability Review (HAZOP)

What is a HAZOP?

A review of the possible deviations of the process from normal conditions

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Hazard and Operability Review (HAZOP)

What is a HAZOP?

A review of the possible deviations of the process from normal conditions

What are these possible deviations?

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Hazard and Operability Review (HAZOP)

What is a HAZOP?

A review of the possible deviations of the process from normal conditions

What are these possible deviations?

High/Low Pressure, High/Low Temperature, High/Low Flow, change in composition

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Hazard and Operability Review (HAZOP)

What is a HAZOP?

A review of the possible deviations of the process from normal conditions

What are these possible deviations?

High/Low Pressure, High/Low Temperature, High/Low Flow, change in composition

How does a HAZOP review proceed?

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Hazard and Operability Review (HAZOP)

What is a HAZOP?

A review of the possible process deviations from normal conditions

What are these possible deviations?

High/Low Pressure, High/Low Temperature, High/Low Flow, change in composition

How does a HAZOP review proceed?

The plant is split in nodes. For each node, each deviation is reviewed.

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Hazard and Operability Review (HAZOP)

What is a HAZOP?

A review of the possible process deviations from normal conditions

What are these possible deviations?

High/Low Pressure, High/Low Temperature, High/Low Flow, change in composition

How does a HAZOP review proceed?

The plant is split in nodes. For each node, each deviation is reviewed.

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Hazard and Operability Review (HAZOP)

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Hazard and Operability Review (HAZOP)

What type of failure are reviewed in HAZOP?

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Hazard and Operability Review (HAZOP)

What type of failure are reviewed in HAZOP? • Failure of process controls • Failure of equipment • Missoperation by operator

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

HAZOP action and response sheet

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Action items follow-up

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Ask to whom shall this follow-up be assigned?

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety Philosophy / Safety Concept

HAZARD Identification

Risk assessment

PLANT Layout

Process Safety Systems

Fire protection & Fire fighting

Fire & Gas Detection

Hazardous area classification

Escape, Evacuation

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Safety of Layout

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Safety of Layout

Where shall we locate the air-coolers electrical sub-station?

?

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Safety of Layout

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety Philosophy / Safety Concept

HAZARD Identification

Risk assessment

PLANT Layout

Process Safety Systems

Fire protection & Fire fighting

Fire & Gas Detection

Hazardous area classification

Escape, Evacuation

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety Philosophy / Safety Concept

HAZARD Identification

Risk assessment

PLANT Layout

Process Safety Systems

Fire protection & Fire fighting

Fire & Gas Detection

Hazardous area classification

Escape, Evacuation

There are 2 types of Fire protection: Active and Passive. Give an example of each…

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety Philosophy / Safety Concept

HAZARD Identification

Risk assessment

PLANT Layout

Process Safety Systems

Fire protection & Fire fighting

Fire & Gas Detection

Hazardous area classification

Escape, Evacuation

There are 2 types of Fire protection: Active and Passive. Give an example of each…

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Fire Fighting

What type of fire fighting equipment uses water?

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Fire Water demand calculation

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Storage tank fire protection: rim seal (low expansion foam) + shell cooling by foam/water spray system (mechanical water/foam proportioner)+ bund foam pourers, all 3 systems are connected to the FW network for water supply + Fire curtain between furnace and process units

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Spray (deluge) system

What is the purpose of fixed water spray systems?

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Fire intensity control/Control of burning: application of water spray to equipment or areas where a fire can occur to control the rate of burning and thereby limit heat release from a fire until fuel can be eliminated or extinguishment effected Exposure protection: absorption of heat through application of water spray to structures or equipment exposed to a fire, to limit surface temperature to a level that will minimize damage and prevent failure

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Spray (deluge) system

What is the purpose of fixed water spray systems? Which equipment are concerned?

Presenter
Presentation Notes
These equipment are not defined in codes but project wise, according to Client requirements (sometimes coming from the Client’s insurer) or as per the Engineer’s choice, in the Job Specification for Design Active Fire Protection. Off-shore all equipment are deluged to cool down the equipment to limit the risk of fire escalation as equipment are very close to each other. On-shore fire fighting is much easier (access) and more space is provided between equipment. Hence a limited number of equipment are deluged. For instance: For fire intensity control: high hazard equipment that contain a severe fuel hazard with a high heat release rate thus requiring an immediate application of water, e.g., All vessels, columns, heat exchangers holding more than 5 m3 LPG type hydrocarbon – except equipment located at elevation of more than 8 meters. Pumps handling LPG HC close to their auto-ignition temperature Compressors handling flammable gases – deluged area shall extend to auxiliaries Exposure protection: e.g. “Equipment containing hydrocarbons which cannot be reached by firewater monitors.” Rk: rate of water spray for fire intensity control is twice that of water spray for exposure protection. Rates are defined by NFPA 15.

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Spray (deluge) system

Equipment to be protected by water spray system are not defined in codes but project wise, according to Client requirements if they exist or as per the Engineer’s choice, in the Job Specification for Design Active Fire Protection. Off-shore all equipment are deluged to cool down the equipment to limit the risk of fire escalation as equipment are very close to each other. On-shore fire fighting is much easier (access) and more space is provided between equipment. Hence a limited number of equipment are deluged. For instance: For fire intensity control: high hazard equipment that contain a severe fuel hazard with a high heat release rate thus requiring an immediate application of water, e.g., • All vessels, columns, heat exchangers holding more than 5 m3 LPG type hydrocarbon –

except equipment located at elevation of more than 8 meters. • Pumps handling LPG • HC close to their auto-ignition temperature • Compressors handling flammable gases – deluged area shall extend to auxiliaries

Exposure protection: e.g. “Equipment containing hydrocarbons which cannot be reached by firewater monitors.”

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Rk: rate of water spray for fire intensity control is twice that of water spray for exposure protection. Rates are defined by NFPA 15.

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Fire Fighting

How do we calculate the Plant Fire water equirements?

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Fire Fighting / Fire Zones

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Fire Water demand calculation

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Rate of deluge are specified in codes, e.g., rate of water spray for fire intensity control is twice that of water spray for exposure protection as per NFPA 15.

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Fire Water facilities

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Fire Water distribution

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Fire Water P&IDs

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Deluge system arrangements

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Deluge system design requirements are specified in codes, e.g., NFPA 15.

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Fire protection and Personnel protection drawing

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Why is this drawing called Personnel protection? Because there are the Safety showers

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Passive fire protection

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Passive fire protection

Presenter
Presentation Notes
How are Fire envelopes defined? A list of equipment creating a fire risk zone is drawn, generally, equipment containing more than 5m3 of liquid HC (as per codes, in, particular API 2218). This «  list of source of hazard for PFP “ is not necessarily a deliverable, but an internal document Fire scenario envelopes around Equipment creating a Fire Hazard are drawn on a Plot Plan. Dimensions of envelopes are specified in the code (API 2218). Equipment inside the enveloppe are screened for requirement of Fire Proofing (criteria is that of code API RP 2218 ): flammable inventory or domino effect

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Passive fire protection

Presenter
Presentation Notes
How are Fire envelopes defined? A list of equipment creating a fire risk zone is drawn, generally, equipment containing more than 5m3 of liquid HC (as per codes, in, particular API 2218). This «  list of source of hazard for PFP “ is not necessarily a deliverable, but an internal document Fire scenario envelopes around Equipment creating a Fire Hazard are drawn on a Plot Plan. Dimensions of envelopes are specified in the code (API 2218). Equipment inside the enveloppe are screened for requirement of Fire Proofing (criteria is that of code API RP 2218 ): flammable inventory or domino effect

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Passive fire protection

How are Fire envelopes defined? •A list of equipment creating a fire risk zone is drawn, generally, equipment containing more than 5m3 of liquid HC (as per codes, in, particular API 2218).

•This « list of source of hazard for PFP “ is not necessarily a deliverable, but an internal document

•Fire scenario envelopes around Equipment creating a Fire Hazard are drawn on a Plot Plan. Dimensions of envelopes are specified in the code (API 2218).

•Equipment inside the enveloppe are screened for requirement of Fire Proofing (criteria is that of code API RP 2218 ): flammable inventory or domino effect.

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety Philosophy / Safety Concept

HAZARD Identification

Risk assessment

PLANT Layout

Process Safety Systems

Fire protection & Fire fighting

Fire & Gas Detection

Hazardous area classification

Escape, Evacuation

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Plant isolation and depressurisation philosophy

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety Philosophy / Safety Concept

HAZARD Identification

Risk assessment

PLANT Layout

Process Safety Systems

Fire protection & Fire fighting

Fire & Gas Detection

Hazardous area classification

Escape, Evacuation

Where shall Emergency ShutDown Valves be provided?

Presenter
Presentation Notes
ESDVs shall be provided between Fire Zones

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Emergency Shutdown System (ESD)

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety Philosophy / Safety Concept

HAZARD Identification

Risk assessment

PLANT Layout

Process Safety Systems

Fire protection & Fire fighting

Fire & Gas Detection

Hazardous area classification

Escape, Evacuation

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Fire & Gas detection layouts

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Fire & Gas Cause & Effects matrix

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety Philosophy / Safety Concept

HAZARD Identification

Risk assessment

PLANT Layout

Process Safety Systems

Fire protection & Fire fighting

Fire & Gas Detection

Hazardous area classification

Escape, Evacuation

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Hazardous area classification drawings

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Hazardous area classification

The referential must be defined, e.g.,

API RP 505 Recommended Practices for Classification of Locations for Electrical Installations at Petroleum Facilities classified as Class I, Zone 0, Zone 1 and Zone 2 (1997 Edition).

Zone 0 location is a location at which ignitible concentration of flammable gases or vapours are present continuously or for long periods of time.

Zone 1 location is a location at which ignitible concentration of flammable gases or vapours are likely to exist under normal operating conditions,

Zone 2 location is a location at which ignitible concentrations of flammable gases or vapours are not likely to occur in normal operation and if they do occur will exist only for a short period

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Besides flammable gas, liquids above their flash points must be identified, as they create hazardous areas Also, liquids above their auto-ignition temperature must be identified. Indeed, surface temperature of equipment/pipes located underneath lines with a liquid above its auto-ignition temperature shall be limited to 80% of the latter.

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Hazardous area classification

The Explosion protection of Electrical and Instrumentation equipment located in Hazardous area is defined by means of: Zone 0/1/2 - Gas Group - Temperature Class

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Gas Group: example of gas group IIC or IIB+H2 is battery room and analyser shelters Temperature class = maximum surface temperature, selected as function of ignition temperature of the concerned flammable mixture

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Hazardous area classification

The Explosion protection of Electrical and Instrumentation equipment located in Hazardous area is defined by means of: Zone 1/2/3 - Gas Group - Temperature Class

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Gas Group: example of gas group IIC or IIB+H2 is battery room and analyser shelters Temperature class = maximum surface temperature, selected as function of ignition temperature of the concerned flammable mixture

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Hazardous area classification extent of hazardous area (API RP 505)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The type of zone depends on likeliness of discharge

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Hazardous area classification extent of hazardous area (API RP 505)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The extent depends if the gas is heavier (left) or lighter (right) than air

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Hazardous area classification extent of hazardous area (API RP 505)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Extent of hazardous area depends on quality of ventilation

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Hazardous area classification extent of hazardous area (API RP 505)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Combustible liquid storage tank

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Hazardous area classification extent of hazardous area (API RP 505)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Flammable liquid storage tank

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Hazardous area classification

Why is the inside of the storage tank zone 1 for the tank on the left and zone 0 for the tank on the right?

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Combustible vs Flammable liquid storage tank As per NFPA: Flammable liquids: liquid with a flash point below 37.8°C Combustible liquids: liquid with flash point above 37.8°C. Example: kerosene, diesel

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Hazardous area classification drawings What is the use of the Hazardous area classification drawing?

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Hazardous area classification drawings

Presenter
Presentation Notes
It allows to specify type of explosion protection for Electrical equipment (motors etc.) and instrumentation It also defines the required equipment maximum surface temperature hence insulation requirements, e.g. reactors of SRU plants are refractory lined, to reduce steel temperature to 340°C and heat insulated to reduce surface temperature to below 200°C or so. Same thing for furnace: refractory lines and cold rain shield which channels air circulation. Surface temperature of equipment/pipes located underneath lines carrying a liquid above its auto-ignition temperature shall be limited to 80% of the latter.

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety Philosophy / Safety Concept

HAZARD Identification

Quantitiative Risk Assessment (QRA)

PLANT Layout

Process Safety Systems

Fire protection & Fire fighting

Fire & Gas Detection

Hazardous area classification

Escape, Evacuation

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

Objective: Define the scenarios of likely loss of containment Content: Identify flammable, toxic fluids, isolatable sections Identify possible consequence: fire, explosion, toxic etc. Identify ignition source Input: PFD, HMB, Plot Plan HAZID Report

Step 0:

Failure cases definition

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Done in the form of a workshop, with attendance of Process and HSE Design Small leaks: flange, valve/pump stuffing box, instrument tapping Medium leak: open purge valve, mechanical failure: impact, vibration etc. Large leak: pipe rupture

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

Step 0:

Failure Case Definition

Case : Gas leak from random piping component rupture

Cause: installation error, corrosion,

material defect…

Possible consequence: Dispersion without ignition / jet fire / flash fire / explosion

Section considered: Compressor building

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

Step 1:

Identification and characterisation of initiating events

Gas leak inside compressor buidling due to component rupture Hole size (% of component section)

5% 20% Full

Frequency (event/year) 1,11E-01 5,06E-04 6,83E-05

Outflow rate (kg/s) 5,7 90,8 2270,0

Σ risk components *failure rate (from statistics)

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

Release Frequency Immediate ignition

ESD & Fire Fighting

Delayed Ignition

Explosion/ Flash-fire

Consequence Event Frequency (ev/y)

0,998 Jet fire ESD & FF 7,779E-030,070

0,002 Jet fire no ESD & FF 1,520E-05

1,11E-01Release/yr

0,949 Dispersion 9,827E-020,930

0,120 Explosion 1,774E-050,028

0,051 0,880 Flash fire 1,301E-04

0,972 Dispersion 5,133E-03

Yes Frequency (event/year)Jet fire ESD & FF 7,779E-03Jet fire no ESD & FF 1,520E-05Explosion 1,774E-05

No Flash Fire 1,301E-04Dispersion 1,034E-01

B04a/b/c/d 5%

Step 2: Event tree analysis

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

Release Frequency Immediate ignition

ESD & Fire Fighting

Delayed Ignition

Explosion/ Flash-fire

Consequence Event Frequency (ev/y)

0,998 Jet fire ESD & FF 7,779E-030,070

0,002 Jet fire no ESD & FF 1,520E-05

1,11E-01Release/yr

0,949 Dispersion 9,827E-020,930

0,120 Explosion 1,774E-050,028

0,051 0,880 Flash fire 1,301E-04

0,972 Dispersion 5,133E-03

Yes Frequency (event/year)Jet fire ESD & FF 7,779E-03Jet fire no ESD & FF 1,520E-05Explosion 1,774E-05

No Flash Fire 1,301E-04Dispersion 1,034E-01

B04a/b/c/d 5%

Probability of immediate ignition for 1-50 kg/s release rate is 7% (from statistical data)

Gas detectors are provided inside the building, that activate isolation and depressurization. It is assumed that they operate 95% of the time.

Probability of explosion vs flash fire (12%) depends on mass of gas and degree of confinement

?

What is the frequency of an explosion?

Probability of delayed ignition (2.8%) takes into account equipment explosion protection (Ex)

Step 2: Event tree analysis

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

Possible consequences of loss of containment

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Dispersions / Jet fire

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Explosion

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

Release Frequency Immediate ignition

ESD & Fire Fighting

Delayed Ignition

Explosion/ Flash-fire

Consequence Event Frequency (ev/y)

0,998 Jet fire ESD & FF 7,779E-030,070

0,002 Jet fire no ESD & FF 1,520E-05

1,11E-01Release/yr

0,949 Dispersion 9,827E-020,930

0,120 Explosion 1,774E-050,028

0,051 0,880 Flash fire 1,301E-04

0,972 Dispersion 5,133E-03

Yes Frequency (event/year)Jet fire ESD & FF 7,779E-03Jet fire no ESD & FF 1,520E-05Explosion 1,774E-05

No Flash Fire 1,301E-04Dispersion 1,034E-01

B04a/b/c/d 5%

Step 2: Event tree analysis

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

Overpresssure (bar) 0.2 0.1 0.01

Distance (m) 96 167 1270

Step 3:

Consequence evalutation

CONSEQUENCE CLASS QUANTITATIVE CRITERIA EFFECTS

MINOR ≤0.1 bar locally (within 10m) No effect, no damage

SIGNIFICANT ≤0.1 bar locally (within 50m) Limited damage to plant and operators

SEVERE > 0.1 bar within plant Damage to plant and operators

MAJOR > 0.1 bar on populated areas Damage to plant, operators & public

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

Unacceptable risk area– Design change necessary

As Low As Reasonably Practicable – Plant Management measures

Acceptable risk area ?

Final step:

classification of risk

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

Unacceptable risk area– Design change necessary

As Low As Reasonably Practicable – Plant Management measures

Acceptable risk area

1.0E-02

1.0E-03

1.0E-04 Unlikely

1.0E-05 Rare

1.0E-06 Minor Significant Severe Major

Final step:

classification of risk

Severity

Prob

abili

ty

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The risk matrix is specified by CPY or by Authorities, for instance in S’poren in France (PPRT).

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

Final step:

classification of risk

CONSEQUENCE CLASS QUANTITATIVE CRITERIA EFFECTS MINOR ≤0.1 bar locally (within

10m) No effect, no damage

SIGNIFICANT ≤0.1 bar locally (within 50m)

Limited damage to plant and operators

SEVERE > 0.1 bar within plant Damage to plant and operators MAJOR > 0.1 bar on populated

areas Damage to plant, operators & public

?

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

Final step:

classification of risk

CONSEQUENCE CLASS QUANTITATIVE CRITERIA EFFECTS MINOR ≤0.1 bar locally (within

10m) No effect, no damage

SIGNIFICANT ≤0.1 bar locally (within 50m)

Limited damage to plant and operators

SEVERE > 0.1 bar within plant Damage to plant and operators MAJOR > 0.1 bar on populated

areas Damage to plant, operators & public

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

Final step:

classification of risk

CONSEQUENCE CLASS QUANTITATIVE CRITERIA EFFECTS MINOR ≤0.1 bar locally (within

10m) No effect, no damage

SIGNIFICANT ≤0.1 bar locally (within 50m)

Limited damage to plant and operators

SEVERE > 0.1 bar within plant Damage to plant and operators MAJOR > 0.1 bar on populated

areas Damage to plant, operators & public

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

CONSEQUENCE CLASS QUANTITATIVE CRITERIA EFFECTS MINOR ≤0.1 bar locally (within

10m) No effect, no damage

SIGNIFICANT ≤0.1 bar locally (within 50m)

Limited damage to plant and operators

SEVERE > 0.1 bar within plant Damage to plant and operators MAJOR > 0.1 bar on populated

areas Damage to plant, operators & public

Outcome?

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

QRA results: Thermal radiation map (>37.5 kW/m2)

Presenter
Presentation Notes
This is used to specify the fire rating of buildings/structures and PFP

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

QRA outcome: Risk Reduction Measures At FEED stage Explosion and fire radiation curves:

Distance between units, e.g., distance between process units and administration buildings, relocation of CCR etc.

Explosion resistance and fire rating of equipment, manned buildings, structures (design for 10-4 per year likelihood: API RP 752 ; ISO19901-3 ; NORSOK Z-013, …)

At Detail Design Stage

Addition of gas detectors Addition of blast/fire protection wall, e.g., between process and utility modules, for

protection of risers ESDV valves Relocation of muster point Relocation of adjacent human occupancy areas (maintenance yard, highway rest area etc.) Recommendation for operations, e.g., increased inspection

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

HAZARD Identification

Quantitiative Risk Assessment (QRA) • Failure cases identification and definition • Consequence Analysis • Frequency Analysis • QRA Outcome

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

HAZARD Identification

Quantitiative Risk Assessment (QRA) • Failure cases identification and definition • Consequence Analysis • Frequency Analysis • QRA Outcome

Another example: toxic gas release

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA) Consequence analysis

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Rk: dispersion calculation depend on weather conditions. Worst is minimum wind. Continuous realease case means no ESD (isolation) is initiated. POD = Probability Of Death

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA) Consequence analysis

What conclusion would you draw?

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The impact is determined at manned locations Recommendation: Install H2S detectors at HVAC inlet of Warehouse D and buildings in administration and maintenance areas to initiate automatic shutdown of HVAC upon H2S detection Remark: same dispersion calculations could be done considering ESD activitation, i.e., isolation and reduced inventory, which will show that the risk to workers (located inside buildings) is reduced. Note: the recommendations could be further submitted to confirmation during the QRA when the probability of occurrence will be evaluated.

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

HAZARD Identification

Quantitiative Risk Assessment (QRA) • Failure cases identification and definition • Consequence Analysis • Frequency Analysis • QRA Outcome

Another example: effect of congestion

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

HAZARD Identification

Quantitiative Risk Assessment (QRA) • Failure cases identification and definition • Consequence Analysis

VCE: a flammable gas or a flashing liquid released to atmosphere, if not immediately ignited, disperses to atmosphere creating a cloud which can develop in a Vapour Cloud Explosion (VCE), if the burning velocity of the cloud is increased due to turbulence generated by obstacles present in the cloud. Effects (damages) are associated to levels of overpressure generated by pressure wave.

Explosion strength depends on level of congestion. Congested areas are identified based on arrangement of equipment/group of equipment,

platforms, and structures within each Process Unit. Air coolers / pipe-racks / compressor shelters are considered as roofs underneath which gas

cloud can accumulate. Free areas between group of equipment within Process Unit reduce the size of the congested

areas. Flammable volume/mass is estimated for each unitary congested area.

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

Identification of congested areas

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

COMPANY Societal Risk Criteria

1.0E-8

1.0E-7

1.0E-6

1.0E-5

1.0E-4

1.0E-3

1.0E-2

1 10 100 1000 Number of Fatalities (N or more)

Freq

uenc

y (/y

r)

Intolerable above line Acceptable below line

ALARP Region

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Design Safety Philosophy / Safety Concept

HAZARD Identification

Risk assessment

PLANT Layout

Process Safety Systems

Fire protection & Fire fighting

Fire & Gas Detection

Hazardous area classification

Escape, Evacuation

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Escape, evacuation

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Escape, evacuation

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Engineering disciplines: activities and deliverables

PROCESS

PLANT LAYOUT

EQUIPMENT

SAFETY & ENVIRONMENT

CIVIL

PIPING

PIPELINE

INSTRUMENTATION

ELECTRICAL

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Health and Environment Requirements Job Specification for Design

Environmental and health aspects

Regulatory requirements

Air emissions

Liquid effluents

Soil & groundwater contamination

Wastes

Pollution prevention

Noise

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Regulatory limits as well as monitoring requirements shall be identified

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Health and Environment Requirements Job Specification for Design

Environmental and health aspects

Regulatory requirements

Air emissions

Liquid effluents

Soil & groundawter contamination

Wastes

Pollution prevention

Noise

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Regulatory limits as well as monitoring requirements shall be identified

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

ENVID Environment Aspects Register

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Regulatory limits as well as monitoring requirements shall be identified

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Environment Emissions regulatory limits

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Environmental Impact Assessment

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

Noise study

dB(A)

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

The Oil & Gas Engineering Guide

Get all this plus the same on other disciplines and the overall picture... in the newly published:

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

The Oil & Gas Engineering Guide - 2nd edition

Table of Contents

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

The Oil & Gas Engineering Guide - 2nd edition

Table of Contents

This suite of training modules covered the discipline chapters of the book...

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

The Oil & Gas Engineering Guide - 2nd edition

Table of Contents

The Guide contains much more:

The overall picture, interfaces, methods & tools, etc.

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

The Oil & Gas Engineering Guide - 2nd edition

Table of Contents

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

The Oil & Gas Engineering Guide - 2nd edition

Table of Contents

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

The Oil & Gas Engineering Guide - 2nd edition

Table of Contents

© 2015 – Hervé Baron

HERVE BARON

The Oil & Gas Engineering Guide 2nd edition

Order direct from the publisher:

http://www.editionstechnip.com/en/catalogue-detail/1111/oil-gas-engineering-guide-the.html