http://neilperkin.typepad.com/only_dead_fish/2010/12/emergence.html does sustainability emerge from...
TRANSCRIPT
http:
//ne
ilper
kin.
type
pad.
com
/onl
y_de
ad_fi
sh/2
010/
12/e
mer
genc
e.ht
ml
Does sustainability emerge from
the relationships
between scales?
Dr Helena BenderKate Judith
Framing theory • Systems
– Boundary– Size is variable (super-system through to sub-system)– Elements that interact
• Emergence– Local actors at micro scale– Patterns emerge from interactions, observed at macro scale– Patterns emerge without a leader
• Scale– Changes in one scale (micro/macro) affects the other– Small changes can have big impacts– Micro = bottom-up– Macro = top-down
http:
//m
egha
nlan
e.w
ordp
ress
.com
/201
0/03
/09/
the-
fram
ing-
theo
ry/
Sustainability is:
• the emergent quality of a system that results from the responsive interplay between the caring actions of individuals (bottom-up) and feedback about the persistence and nourishment of the interrelationships between elements of the supporting environment and ultimately the global system (top-down)
Defining sustainability
http:
//ho
mes
.nin
emsn
.com
.au/
blog
.asp
x?bl
ogen
tryi
d=80
8470
&sh
owco
mm
ents
=tru
e
Fred
Will
iam
s Eu
chuc
a La
ndsc
ape
1961
Space between micro and macro scales
• Structure of the space– difficult to describe– not static– size of the gap between the scales is variable
• Questions important to the relationship between scales– know and understand each other?– communicate and feedback to each other?– direction of communication (bi-directional)?– contribution of the structure of the space?
Knowing the other scale
• Different culture, different scale– Mismatches that prevent
• flow of information• good decision making• attempts to work towards sustainability
• Action – recognise different cultures– establish structures, habits or values– experience at different scales– choice of language, venue and framing– develop value frameworks– develop theory and practice together to
inform each other (Norton 2002)
Photo copyright R.W. D
ecker.
Communication and feedback between the scales
• Different language between scales– Mismatches prevent
• Understanding• Exchange• Communication• Attempts to move towards sustainability
• Action– Position of problem solving (Norton 2002)– Open and vigorous communication
• Emergence of well-adapted theory and action
Structure of the space between scales
• Structure shapes outcome– Indirect (termites, policy documents)– Direct (body language)
• Encourage – Examine the structure for facilitation– reasoned decisions
• Minimise – inappropriate responses– boundary less defined
http:
//w
ww
.radi
calm
ontr
eal.c
om/2
012/
03/s
usta
inab
le-s
tree
t-art
.htm
l
Processes to support emergence
• Reduced outside control• Create a space for risk taking• Reduce need for security • Maintain complexity and diversity– interaction– information sharing
• Reduce control from above• Decision making based on local
information and environment (Johnson 2003)
http://inhabitat.com/earthquake-resistant-earthships-for-haiti-disaster-relief/
Processes that ensure emergence leads to sustainability
• Nourishing interactions between the system and its environment
• Framework to determine patterns at macro scale from local nourishment
• Iterative process between the scales• Tight feedback: timely information sharing
that reaches all stakeholders
http:
//w
ww
.lsa.
umic
h.ed
u/ee
b/ne
ws_
even
ts/n
ews/
new
sDet
ail.a
sp?I
D=1
17
http:
//di
gita
lesk
imo.
net/
blog
/cat
egor
y/su
stai
nabl
e/pa
ge/2
Summary – What is needed to lead to sustainability?
• Efforts to get to know the scales above and below• Attention to the communication channels between the
scales• Monitoring structures, tools and processes• Decision making structures that flatten power structures• Iterative processes between scales• Valuing of diversity and complexity• Creation of a space for risk taking, tolerance of some
vulnerability• Nourishing actions at the micro scale
What’s next for working towards sustainability?
• Models for better communication between scales– Duplication in knowledge carriers– Command ethic to share and trade knowledge
• Approaches for tight feedback– role of command and character ethics– flattening the space between the scales
http://www.aboriginalartstore.com.au/aboriginal-art-culture/indigenous-australian-art-comm.php