"hunter v. clare."

1
795 QUININE AND MALARIA. To the Editors of THE LANCET. SIRS,-Professor Koch’s statement " that the treatment of blackwater fever with quinine must absolutely cease" " which in this out-of-the-way region has only just reached me, leads me to write a protest fearing that such a statement from a man in his position may lead to very disastrous results. After more than eight years’ experience in Central Africa I feel perfectly sure that if quinine is not used in these severe cases the death-rate will increase to an enormous extent. In 1889, when I first came to this country, I was horrified at the excessive doses of quinine which were taken by traders and I treated my first severe cases of fever with compara- tively small doses, not more than 15 grains a day. Being dissatisfied with the results I treated three severe cases with 10 grains every four hours, one of them taking 180 grains in three days. In none of these did hæmoglobinuria appear and they all recovered, but I decided no longer to give such large doses and since then I have never given more than 30 grains during the first 24 hours and not more than 15 grains daily until the fever ceases, when five grains only are taken for a few days. Two things I consider very im- portant in the administration of quinine. First, not to give it without an aperient combined with calomel. Secondly, not to give it when the temperature is rising or is above 102° F. It must only be given when the temperature is falling or is below 102° F. In several cases latterly I have tried giving smaller doses, but in the end I have had to return to the larger doses before the fever would break. Professor Koch suggests some other remedy instead of quinine. The only other remedy to which I have given a fair trial is arsenic and this I find useless except as a tonic. To give up quinine in our hæmoglobinuric fevers would, I consider, take away from patients their best chance of recovery. Quinine may cause hasmoglobinuria in some cases, but I have never seen a case and I think they must be very rare. In THE LANCET of Jan. 16th, 1897, you kindly inserted a letter from me on the malarial parasite. In it I men- tioned my discovery of an unpigmented parasite in all our varieties of malarial fever. That these parasites very rapidly destroy the corpuscles which they attack is very evident in ’the anasmia which so quickly appears in our African fevers. What becomes of the haemoglobin ? It is not converted into pigment which is evident from the fact that the parasite is non-pigmented ; also there is no melanasmia. The first severe fever which a European has is generally of the bilious remit- tent type. What causes the excessive jaundice so character- istic of these fevers ? I look upon it as the result of free hæmoglobin in the plasma of the blood which the liver is doing its best to remove. If the patient recovers, his second or third severe attack of fever will still be bilious but the jaundice not so marked, but bæmoglobinuria will also be present. Why? ? My explanation is that the liver, weakened by former fevers, is not able to meet the demand made upon its secretory powers and as free hæmoglobin in the plasma must be a powerful poison the kidneys do their best to remove it. I am, Sirs, yours faithfully, WALTER FISHER, M.R.C.S. Eng., L.R.C.P. Lond. Nana Candundu, Lovale Country, Dec. 12th, 1898. " INTRAVENOUS INJECTIONS IN SYPHILIS." To the Editors of THE LANCET. SIRS,-I have read with pleasure the letter from Dr. C. F. Marshall upon the above subject in THE LANCET of Starch 4th. I should like to make one or two remarks. Dr. Marshall says: 1. "Daily injection is irksome and incon- venient both to the patient and operator." I did not find this so when house surgeon at the London Male Lock Hospital, but it might be considered a disadvantage in general practice. 2. "The quantity of mercury administered is not the point but the effect produced on the patient." Since we are only able to judge of effect by quantity administered I must say that I think it is very important to know if possible the exact quantity of mercury introduced into the circulation. Then we can regulate the effect bv increasing or diminishing the quantity given. This can be done when mercury is employed by means of the intravenous injection but not when pills are given as we cannot be certain of the quantity of the drug absorbed. Dr. Marshall also says that the average time for symptoms of primary and secondary cases to disappear under treatment by pills is 21 days. From my own experience, having seen a great number of cases in the in- and out-patient departments of the London Male Lock Hospital, I should put it at a much longer time. The average duration of symptoms in my cases was 23 days. All the cases I quoted were treated as in-patients and were of the worst type of the disease, as on account of the limited number of beds only the worst cases were admitted to the wards. I cannot think that 21 days would have been the average duration of the symptoms of these cases had they been treated by pills. I am, Sirs, yours faithfully, Uoictiester, March 8th, 1699. ARTHUR CHOPPING. "HUNTER v. CLARE." To the Editors of THE LANCET. SIRS,-Mrs. Kingsley Hunter’s letter in your last issue cannot fail to put a very strong complexion on the origin of the "Hunter case." One thing, howver, is clear. There can be no doubt that a brother practitioner has been very hardly dealt with. Whether the prosecution directed against him by the Council was justifiable or not remains to be seen, but that it was a grave mistake few will deny. The widow states that it killed her husband, and whether this be the fact or not there is no gainsaying that it ruined his practice and left her destitute. Under these circumstances I think that steps should be taken to assist the widow of one of our brethren who for no fault of his own was made to appear like a quack in the eyes of the public and had his young life brought to such an unhappy close. I should be glad to subscribe to any fund that might be organised for Mrs. Kingsley Hunter’s benefit. I am, Sirs, yours faithfully, MAJOR GREENWOOD, M.D. Brux., LL. B. Lond. Hackney-road, N.E., March 12th, 1899. " THE STYLE OF PHYSICIAN." 70 the Editors of THE 1.JANCET. SIRS,-I see that my letter in THE LANCET of Feb. 4th has stirred up a spirit of inquiry. It appeared to me that the ruling of the Appeal judges was that the corporations gave specific titles. That being so the Apothecaries’ Society would give the legal title of "apothecary." The "physician" " is a person who practises physic " or "medicine " by the administration of internal remedies for internal diseases, as distinguished from the " surgeon who is the hand-worker and operator concerned with diseases which are capable of manipulative treatment. The "apothecary" is licensed to deal with disease which can be treated by drugs and also to charge for medicine supplied. I believe it is only since the failure of negotiations for amalgamation that the Hall has commenced to examine in surgery on the strength of some clause in its charter which had not previously been taken advantage of. The cardinal dis- tinction appears to be the power to sell drugs, and I believe this power is exercised by the Hall itself. A physician may administer drugs to his patient but can make no legal charge for the medicines. It is certainly anomalous that surgeon" alone should signify a general practitioner, but " surgeon-apothecary" might possibly be a fairly descriptive title. I will, however, suggest that the title " doctor " with qualification affixed is the most likely one to convey a general impression of the position of the L.S.A. who does not charge for drugs, while one who does so ought to content himself as " surgeon-apothecary and accoucheur." I am, Sirs, yours faithfully, Loughborough, March 8th, 1899. J. B. PIKE. STOMATITIS IN MYXŒDEMA. To the Editors of THE LANCET. SIRS,-In connexion with the case of acute oedema of parts within the mouth in the course of myxosdema published in THE LANCET of Feb. 4th, 1899, it may be interesting to notice a case which appeared in the Berliner Klinische Wochenschrift for 1887, p. 400, entitled "Ein Fall von Myxcedem mit starker Stomatitis und Hepatitis Inter- stitialis." In the latter the patient, a man 64 years of age, was admitted into the Charity Hospital of Posen under the care of Dr. Zielewicz, with great swelling of the face and

Upload: dangbao

Post on 30-Dec-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

795

QUININE AND MALARIA.To the Editors of THE LANCET.

SIRS,-Professor Koch’s statement " that the treatment ofblackwater fever with quinine must absolutely cease" " whichin this out-of-the-way region has only just reached me, leadsme to write a protest fearing that such a statement from aman in his position may lead to very disastrous results.After more than eight years’ experience in Central Africa Ifeel perfectly sure that if quinine is not used in these severecases the death-rate will increase to an enormous extent.

In 1889, when I first came to this country, I was horrified atthe excessive doses of quinine which were taken by tradersand I treated my first severe cases of fever with compara-tively small doses, not more than 15 grains a day. Beingdissatisfied with the results I treated three severe cases

with 10 grains every four hours, one of them taking 180grains in three days. In none of these did hæmoglobinuriaappear and they all recovered, but I decided no longer togive such large doses and since then I have never given morethan 30 grains during the first 24 hours and not more than15 grains daily until the fever ceases, when five grains onlyare taken for a few days. Two things I consider very im-

portant in the administration of quinine. First, not to giveit without an aperient combined with calomel. Secondly, notto give it when the temperature is rising or is above 102° F.It must only be given when the temperature is falling or isbelow 102° F. In several cases latterly I have tried givingsmaller doses, but in the end I have had to return to thelarger doses before the fever would break. Professor Koch

suggests some other remedy instead of quinine. The onlyother remedy to which I have given a fair trial is arsenicand this I find useless except as a tonic. To give up quininein our hæmoglobinuric fevers would, I consider, take awayfrom patients their best chance of recovery. Quinine maycause hasmoglobinuria in some cases, but I have never seen acase and I think they must be very rare.

In THE LANCET of Jan. 16th, 1897, you kindly inserted aletter from me on the malarial parasite. In it I men-

tioned my discovery of an unpigmented parasite in all ourvarieties of malarial fever. That these parasites very rapidlydestroy the corpuscles which they attack is very evident in’the anasmia which so quickly appears in our African fevers.What becomes of the haemoglobin ? It is not converted into

pigment which is evident from the fact that the parasite isnon-pigmented ; also there is no melanasmia. The first severefever which a European has is generally of the bilious remit-tent type. What causes the excessive jaundice so character-istic of these fevers ? I look upon it as the result of free

hæmoglobin in the plasma of the blood which the liver isdoing its best to remove. If the patient recovers, his secondor third severe attack of fever will still be bilious but the

jaundice not so marked, but bæmoglobinuria will also be present. Why? ? My explanation is that the liver, weakenedby former fevers, is not able to meet the demand made uponits secretory powers and as free hæmoglobin in the plasmamust be a powerful poison the kidneys do their best toremove it. I am, Sirs, yours faithfully,

WALTER FISHER, M.R.C.S. Eng., L.R.C.P. Lond.Nana Candundu, Lovale Country, Dec. 12th, 1898.

" INTRAVENOUS INJECTIONS INSYPHILIS."

To the Editors of THE LANCET.

SIRS,-I have read with pleasure the letter from Dr. C. F.Marshall upon the above subject in THE LANCET ofStarch 4th. I should like to make one or two remarks. Dr.Marshall says: 1. "Daily injection is irksome and incon-venient both to the patient and operator." I did not findthis so when house surgeon at the London Male Lock Hospital,but it might be considered a disadvantage in general practice.2. "The quantity of mercury administered is not the pointbut the effect produced on the patient." Since we are onlyable to judge of effect by quantity administered I must saythat I think it is very important to know if possible the exactquantity of mercury introduced into the circulation. Thenwe can regulate the effect bv increasing or diminishing thequantity given. This can be done when mercury is employedby means of the intravenous injection but not when pills aregiven as we cannot be certain of the quantity of the

drug absorbed. Dr. Marshall also says that the averagetime for symptoms of primary and secondary cases to

disappear under treatment by pills is 21 days. From my own

experience, having seen a great number of cases in thein- and out-patient departments of the London Male LockHospital, I should put it at a much longer time. The

average duration of symptoms in my cases was 23 days. Allthe cases I quoted were treated as in-patients and were ofthe worst type of the disease, as on account of the limitednumber of beds only the worst cases were admitted to thewards. I cannot think that 21 days would have been theaverage duration of the symptoms of these cases had theybeen treated by pills.

I am, Sirs, yours faithfully,Uoictiester, March 8th, 1699. ARTHUR CHOPPING.

"HUNTER v. CLARE."To the Editors of THE LANCET.

SIRS,-Mrs. Kingsley Hunter’s letter in your last issuecannot fail to put a very strong complexion on the origin ofthe "Hunter case." One thing, howver, is clear. Therecan be no doubt that a brother practitioner has been

very hardly dealt with. Whether the prosecution directedagainst him by the Council was justifiable or not remains tobe seen, but that it was a grave mistake few will deny. Thewidow states that it killed her husband, and whether this bethe fact or not there is no gainsaying that it ruined his

practice and left her destitute. Under these circumstances Ithink that steps should be taken to assist the widow of oneof our brethren who for no fault of his own was made to

appear like a quack in the eyes of the public and had hisyoung life brought to such an unhappy close.

I should be glad to subscribe to any fund that mightbe organised for Mrs. Kingsley Hunter’s benefit.

I am, Sirs, yours faithfully,MAJOR GREENWOOD, M.D. Brux., LL. B. Lond.

Hackney-road, N.E., March 12th, 1899.

" THE STYLE OF PHYSICIAN."70 the Editors of THE 1.JANCET.

SIRS,-I see that my letter in THE LANCET of Feb. 4thhas stirred up a spirit of inquiry. It appeared to me thatthe ruling of the Appeal judges was that the corporationsgave specific titles. That being so the Apothecaries’ Societywould give the legal title of "apothecary." The "physician"

"

is a person who practises physic " or "medicine " by theadministration of internal remedies for internal diseases, asdistinguished from the " surgeon who is the hand-workerand operator concerned with diseases which are capable ofmanipulative treatment. The "apothecary" is licensed todeal with disease which can be treated by drugs and alsoto charge for medicine supplied. I believe it is onlysince the failure of negotiations for amalgamation thatthe Hall has commenced to examine in surgery on the

strength of some clause in its charter which had not

previously been taken advantage of. The cardinal dis-tinction appears to be the power to sell drugs, and I believethis power is exercised by the Hall itself. A physicianmay administer drugs to his patient but can make no legalcharge for the medicines. It is certainly anomalous thatsurgeon" alone should signify a general practitioner, but" surgeon-apothecary" might possibly be a fairly descriptivetitle. I will, however, suggest that the title " doctor " withqualification affixed is the most likely one to convey a generalimpression of the position of the L.S.A. who does not chargefor drugs, while one who does so ought to content himself as" surgeon-apothecary and accoucheur."

I am, Sirs, yours faithfully,Loughborough, March 8th, 1899. J. B. PIKE.

STOMATITIS IN MYXŒDEMA.To the Editors of THE LANCET.

SIRS,-In connexion with the case of acute oedema of partswithin the mouth in the course of myxosdema published inTHE LANCET of Feb. 4th, 1899, it may be interesting tonotice a case which appeared in the Berliner KlinischeWochenschrift for 1887, p. 400, entitled "Ein Fall von

Myxcedem mit starker Stomatitis und Hepatitis Inter-stitialis." In the latter the patient, a man 64 years of age,was admitted into the Charity Hospital of Posen under thecare of Dr. Zielewicz, with great swelling of the face and