hydrogeochemical data from an acidic deposition …

139
HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION STUDY AT MCDONALDS BRANCH BASIN IN THE NEW JERSEY PINELANDS, 1983-86 By Deborah G. Lord, Julia L. Barringer, Patricia A. Johnsson, Paul F. Schuster, Richard L. Walker, James E. Fairchild, Bernard N. Sroka, and Eric Jacobsen U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 88-500 Prepared in cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES West Trenton, New Jersey 1990

Upload: others

Post on 25-Apr-2022

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION STUDY AT MCDONALDS BRANCH BASIN IN THE NEW JERSEY PINELANDS, 1983-86

By Deborah G. Lord, Julia L. Barringer, Patricia A. Johnsson, Paul F. Schuster, Richard L. Walker, James E. Fairchild, Bernard N. Sroka, and Eric Jacobsen

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Open-File Report 88-500

Prepared in cooperation with the

NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES

West Trenton, New Jersey 1990

Page 2: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Dallas L. Peck, Director

For additional information write to:

District ChiefU.S. Geological Survey, WRDMountain View Office Park,810 Bear Tavern Road, Suite 206West Trenton, NJ 08628

Copies of this report may be purchased from:

U.S. Geological SurveyBooks and Open-File Reports SectionBldg. 810, Box 25425Denver, CO 80225

Page 3: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

CONTENTS

Page

Abstract........................................................... 1Introduction....................................................... 2

Purpose and scope............................................. 4Acknowledgments............................................... 4

Study area......................................................... 5Hydrology..................................................... 5Geology....................................................... 7

Cohansey Sand............................................ 7Beacon Hill Gravel....................................... 7Tertiary and Quaternary Alluvium......................... 10

Soils......................................................... 10Series................................................... 10

Evesboro, Downer, and Lakewood Soils................ 10Lakehurst Soil...................................... 15Atsion, Berryland, and Muck Soils................... 15

Soil mineralogy.......................................... 15Vegetation.................................................... 17

Upland complex........................................... 17Lowland complex.......................................... 17

Data collection.................................................... 19Network design................................................ 19

Precipitation............................................ 19Throughfall.............................................. 24Soil water............................................... 27Surface water............................................ 27Ground water............................................. 29

Hydrologic data............................................... 29Water-quality data collection, processing, and preservation... 32

Equipment preparation.................................... 32Precipitation and throughfall............................ 32Soil water............................................... 33Surface water............................................ 33Ground water............................................. 33

Analytical methods................................................. 35Equipment specifications...................................... 35Chemical analysis............................................. 35Mineralogic analysis.......................................... 36Soil analysis................................................. 36

Quality assurance.................................................. 37Hydrologic and water-quality data.................................. 39

Hydrologic data............................................... 39Water-quality data............................................ 39

Discussion of data................................................. 42References cited................................................... 44Glossary........................................................... 50

iii

Page 4: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

ILLUSTRATIONS

Page

Figure 1. Map showing location of study area in the Pinelands ofNew Jersey............................................ 3

2. Idealized vertical section showing ground-water flowpatterns in the Pinelands............................. 6

3-9. Maps of McDonalds Branch basin showing:3. Geology............................................ 84. Soils.............................................. 115. Topography and surface-water drainage area......... 126. Vegetation......................................... 187. Locations of precipitation, throughfall, and soil-

water sampling sites............................. 218. Locations of ground-water observation wells and

staff gages...................................... 229. Location of surface-water-quality sampling sites

and water-quality wells .......................... 2310-12. Sketches showing:

10. A typical bulk precipitation collector............. 2511. A typical throughfall collector.................... 2612. A typical soil lysimeter........................... 28

13. Graph of daily discharge at McDonalds Branch gagingstation, October 1984 through March 1986.............. 55

14-18. Hydrograph, October 1984 through March 1986, for:14. Well QWO-3B........................................ 5615. Well QWH-3B........................................ 5716. Well QWC-3A........................................ 5817. Well QWC-3B........................................ 5918. U.S. Geological Survey long-term observation well

LSF-23D.......................................... 60

TABLES

Table 1. Mineralogy of clay/fine-silt fractions of selected claylenses in McDonalds Branch basin...................... 9

2. Chemical analyses of selected soils in McDonalds Branchbasin................................................. 13

3. Particle-size distribution in Lakehurst, Lakewood,Atsion, and Evesboro soils in McDonalds Branch basin.. 14

4. Mineralogy of clay/fine-silt fractions of Lakehurst, Lakewood, Atsion, and Evesboro soils in McDonalds Branch basin.......................................... 16

5. Data-collection sites in McDonalds Branch basin......... 206. Construction data for water-level observation wells..... 307. Construction data for water-quality wells............... 318. Summary of collection and analysis of samples from

McDonalds Branch basin.................................. 349. Chemical analyses of wash blanks, January 1985 through

December 1986......................................... 3810. WATSTORE site-identification numbers and site descrip­

tions for water-quality sites in McDonalds Branch basin................................................. 40

iv

Page 5: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

TABLES - -Continued

Page

11. Rainfall to McDonalds Branch basin, January 24, 1985through March 25, 1986--event-recording rain gages.... 61

12. Rainfall to McDonalds Branch basin, February 7, 1985through March 25, 1986--wedge rain gages.............. 63

13. Throughfall to McDonalds Branch basin, December 24, 1985through March 25, 1986--wedge rain gages.............. 66

14. Stage measurements from upstream sites in McDonaldsBranch basin.......................................... 67

15. Altitude of the water table in McDonalds Branch basin:Data from water-level observation wells............... 69

16. Altitude of the water table in McDonalds Branch basin:Data from water-quality wells......................... 81

17. Chemical analyses of precipitation in McDonalds Branchbasin, January 24, 1985 through March 18, 1986........ 86

18. Chemical analyses of throughfall in McDonalds Branchbasin, September 23, 1985 through March 25, 1986...... 92

19. Chemical analyses of soil water in McDonalds Branchbasin, January 10, 1985 through March 21, 1986........ 95

20. Chemical analyses of surface water in McDonalds Branchbasin, January 24, 1985 through March 21, 1986........ 101

21. Chemical analyses of ground water in McDonalds Branchbasin, January 30, 1985 through February 26, 1986..... 107

22. Statistical summary of chemical analyses of precipita­ tion in McDonalds Branch basin, January 24, 1985 through March 18, 1986 ................................ 119

23. Statistical summary of chemical analyses of selected surface waters in McDonalds Branch basin, January 24, 1985 through March 21, 1986............... 121

24. Statistical summary of chemical analyses of ground water in McDonalds Branch basin, January 30, 1985 through February 26, 1986 ..................................... 125

Page 6: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

CONVERSION FACTORS

Multiply inch-pound unit

inch (in.)foot (ft)foot (ft)mile (mi)foot per mile (ft/mi)

square mile (mi 2 )

gallonscubic foot (ft3 )cubic foot (ft 3 )

cubic foot per second (ft3 /s)

bv.

Length

2.5430.480.30481.609

Area

2.590

Volume

3.7850.0283228.32

Flow

0.02832

To obtain SI unit

centimeter (cm)centimeter (cm)meter (m)kilometer (km)meter per kilometer (m/km)

square kilometer (km2 )

liter (L)cubic meter (m3 )liter (L)

cubic meter per second (m3 /s)

Temperature conversion formula: °F=1.8x°C+32

Sea level: In this report "sea level" refers to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD of 1929)--a geodetic datum derived from a general adjustment of the first-order level nets of both the United States and Canada, formerly called "Sea Level Datum of 1929."

VI

Page 7: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION STUDY AT MCDONALDS BRANCH BASIN IN THE NEW JERSEY PINELANDS, 1983-86

By Deborah G. Lord, Julia L. Barringer, Patricia A. Johnsson, Paul F. Schuster, Richard L. Walker, James E. Fairchild,

Bernard N. Sroka, and Eric Jacobsen

ABSTRACT

This report presents data from an acidic deposition study at McDonalds Branch basin from 1983-1986. These data include mineralogy of soil and depositional clays; physical and chemical analyses of soils; hydrologic measurements (precipitation and throughfall amounts, stream stage and discharge, and water-table altitudes); and water-quality data from precipitation, throughfall, soil water, surface water, and ground water. Site locations, collector designs, and well-construction data also are presented.

Precipitation was collected weekly and amount measured continuously at the upstream and downstream ends of the basin. Throughfall was collected and amount measured weekly beneath four major canopy types in the basin: pitch pine/black oak, pitch pine/blackjack oak, red maple/black gum, and Atlantic white cedar. Precipitation and throughfall samples each were composited into monthly samples. Soil water was collected monthly from the 0, A and/or E, and B or C horizons of four major soil series in the basin: Atsion, Lakehurst, Lakewood, and Evesboro. Ground water was collected bimonthly from wells located in downgradient order along ground-water flow paths into a hardwood swamp, a pond community (open-channel area), and a cedar swamp. Ground-water levels were measured monthly at 65 wells and recorded continuously at four wells in the basin. Surface water was collected monthly from up to 10 sites along the stream. Stream-stage levels were measured monthly at three sites and continuously recorded at McDonalds Branch gaging station.

Temperature, pH, and specific conductance of water samples were measured in the field, or in the laboratory following collection. Dissolved oxygen in surface and ground waters also was measured in the field. Major cations (calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, and ammonium), major anions (sulfate, nitrate, chloride, phosphate, and fluoride), selected trace metals (aluminum, iron, manganese, and lead), dissolved organic carbon, pH, specific conductance, acidity, and alkalinity were analyzed at the U.S. Geological Survey Central laboratory in Denver, Colorado. Alkalinity also was determined by the Gran titration method at the New Jersey District laboratory.

Physical and chemical properties of soils in the basin that were analyzed include particle-size distribution, pH, exchange acidity, cation exchange capacity, percent organic matter, base cations, extractable and exchangeable aluminum, iron, and soluble sulfate. These soils are composed of greater than 89 percent sand-sized particles, have low pH (pH less than 4.9), have low cation exchange capacities (less than 0.5 to 10.5 milliequivalents per 100 grams), and contain up to 1,686 micrograms per liter extractable aluminum and up to 4,088 micrograms per liter extractable iron. Mineralogy of the fine-silt/clay fraction of selected soil and

Page 8: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

depositional clay samples also was determined. The fine-silt/clay fraction of these soils is composed primarily of kaolinite, fine-grained quartz, illite, and aluminum-interlayered vermiculite. Some chlorite, aluminum- inter layered montmorillonite, and gibbsite also were present. The depositional clay lenses in the basin are composed primarily of fine-grained quartz, kaolinite, and illite.

From February 1985 through January 1986, McDonalds Branch basin received approximately 37.9 inches of rainfall, and discharge at McDonalds Branch gaging station totaled approximately 6.5 inches. Bulk precipitation in McDonalds Branch basin over the sampling period had a mean pH of approximately 4.3, and stream pH generally increased in the downstream direction, ranging from 3.2 to 4.8. Aluminum concentrations were often high in the basin's waters; the highest aluminum concentration, 10,000 micrograms per liter, was observed at the farthest upstream sampling site. Sulfate was generally the dominant anion in waters in the basin. Dissolved organic carbon in stream water generally ranged from 1.1 to 37 milligrams per liter. Hydrogen ion, aluminum, and sulfate concentrations were generally higher in shallow ground water than in deeper ground water in the basin. In ground water, the highest concentrations of hydrogen ion, aluminum, iron, sulfate, and dissolved organic carbon were found in shallow ground waters near wetlands and lowlands in the hardwood swamp and pond community (open- channel) areas of the basin.

INTRODUCTION

The New Jersey Pinelands is a unique and sensitive natural area, spanning 1,700 mi 2 (square miles) of the Atlantic Coastal Plain in New Jersey, as shown in figure 1 (New Jersey Pinelands Commission, 1980). Overlying mostly sands and gravels, the Pinelands supports a variety of habitats, including extensive pine-oak and oak-pine forests interspersed with swamps and cranberry bogs. A number of rare plant species, including delicate orchids, attract botanists from around the world. The necessity of preserving the Pinelands as a natural area was recognized by the U.S. Government in 1978, when the region became the nation's first National Reserve. The importance of the area is underscored by the more than 10.8 trillion gallons of fresh water which the Pinelands holds within its streams and aquifers (Rhodehamel, 1970, p. 24). This water currently is used for drinking water in some areas and also constitutes a potentially important reservoir for the growing metropolitan areas in and around New Jersey. A portion of the Pinelands was purchased by the State of New Jersey in 1954 for conservation and recreational needs, and to meet the future water demands of the State (Means and others, 1981).

The location of the Pinelands within the heavily industrialized northeastern corridor makes it probable that the region will be subject to the deleterious effects of acidic deposition. The streams and shallow ground water in the Pinelands are acidic, with low alkalinities and generally low buffering capacities. Concentrations of organic acids also are elevated at times, especially during the warmer months of the year. The soils also are acidic and generally nutrient-poor. Johnson (1979a and 1979b) recognized trends toward decreasing pH in two small Pinelands streams (McDonalds Branch and Oyster Creek) between 1963 and 1978 and suggested that acidic deposition might be the cause of this phenomenon.

Page 9: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

75* 74<

41'

40*

39'

PENNSYLVANIA

0 10I.-.M'

EXPLANATIONPinelands National Reserve

03 McDonalds Branch study area

20 MILES

0 10 20 KILOMETERS

74°30' 74°29'

39° 53'

39°52'

EXPLANATION

Basin boundary--Stream

V2

1 KILOMETER

Base from U.S. Geological Survey Brown Mills 1:24.000. 1971, Whitinn 1:24,000, 1971; Chatsworth 1:24.000. 1957; Woodmansie 1:24,000, 1957

Base from U.S. Geological Survey 1:250,000 quadrangles

Figure 1.--Location of study area in the Pinelands of New Jersey.

Page 10: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Purpose and Scope

From 1983-1986, the U.S. Geological Survey conducted a study of the effects of acidic deposition on McDonalds Branch basin, a small (2.35 mi2 ) forested watershed located in Lebanon State Forest, near the center of the Pinelands (fig. 1). This report is a compilation of the hydrogeo- chemical data collected during that study. The geology, hydrology, soils, and vegetation are discussed in considerable detail because (1) they differ greatly with location in the basin, (2) they affect the quality of basin waters, and (3) they were important in determining the design of the study.

The framework for this study was provided by the work of Rhodehamel (1970, 1979b) on the Pinelands hydrology, of Means and others (1981) on the hydrogeochemistry of the Pinelands, of Swanson (1979) and Turner (1983) on the chemistry of trace metals in McDonalds Branch basin, of Markley (1955) on the soils of McDonalds Branch basin, and of McCormick (1955) on the vegetation of McDonalds Branch basin. Madsen and others (1986) also studied biochemical processes in McDonalds Branch basin. Additionally, water- quality and streamflow data have been collected at McDonalds Branch by the U.S. Geological Survey since 1963 and 1953, respectively, as part of the nationwide hydrologic bench-mark studies program.

The design of the data-collection network used in the 1983-86 study at McDonalds Branch basin was based on the following project objectives: (1) to identify the components contributing to the acidity of waters (strong acidity versus organic acidity); (2) to examine the components of the flow system and determine their relative contributions to the volume and chemistry of streamflow; (3) to examine trace-metal mobilization and the role of organic matter in this mobilization; and (4) to develop conceptual hydrologic and chemical models to describe the system.

During 1984 and 1985, the basin was instrumented. In 1985 and 1986, water-quality samples of precipitation, throughfall, soil water, surface water, and ground water were collected. Water samples were analyzed for major ions, selected trace metals, dissolved organic carbon, pH, specific conductance, and alkalinity. Hydrologic data also were collected, including precipitation and throughfall amounts, stage measurements, and ground-water levels. Geologic and soil investigations included location of major clay lenses, identification of clay mineralogy, and chemical analysis and particle-size distributions of mineral soil horizons.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their appreciation to Arthur H. Johnson of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa., for his helpful suggestions, guidance, and encouragement through all phases of this study. We also thank H. Christopher Smith of the U.S. Soil Conservation Service, Somerset, N.J., for assistance in soils and geologic work, and for numerous suggestions that improved the soils section of this report. We appreciate the cooperation and assistance of Christian M. Bethmann, Superintendent of Lebanon State Forest, and his staff in providing labor and equipment, particularly during Hurricane Gloria. The support of both Robert Runyon and Gail Carter of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Water Resources, also is appreciated.

Page 11: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

The maps in the figures of this report were generated using the New Jersey Geographic Information System (CIS).

This study was performed in cooperation with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Water Resources.

STUDY AREA

Hydrology

The Pinelands have a humid and temperate climate that is mostly conti­ nental (Markley, 1971), with a small oceanic influence. The mean annual air temperature is approximately 11.5 °C (degrees Celsius) (53.3 °F (degrees Fahrenheit)), with the lowest mean monthly temperature, -0.5 °C (31.4 °F), occurring in January, and the highest mean monthly temperature, 23.5 °C (62.0 °F), occurring in July. The average annual precipitation to the Pinelands, based on data from 1951-1980, is 45.8 in. (inches), and the highest average monthly precipitation, 5.3 in., occurs in August (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1982).

The Pinelands lies within the Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain physiographic province in New Jersey and is underlain by the Kirkwood- Cohansey aquifer system. This aquifer system is generally unconfined, with small localized confined units. The hydrology of the Pinelands is strongly influenced by the sandy composition of the aquifer system, which, in most areas, facilitates the rapid infiltration of precipitation. Precipitation is the only source of water to the aquifer system; all Pinelands streams originate within the region (Rhodehamel, 1979b).

In McDonalds Branch basin and other upland areas, there often is recharge to the aquifer system. Ground water discharges to the peripheral, low-lying streams as shown in figure 2 (Rhodehamel, 1970, fig. 2). Rhodehamel (1970, p. 14) estimated that ground-water discharge comprises 89 percent of streamflow in the Pinelands region. McDonalds Branch flows westward from its origin in the central uplands region of the Pinelands toward the North Branch of the Rancocas Creek, which ultimately discharges to the Delaware River.

The average discharge of McDonalds Branch is 2.26 ft 3 /s (cubic feet per second), or 13.06 in./yr (inches per year), based on 33 years of record (Bauersfeld and others, 1987, p. 110). The average annual minimum discharge for a 7-day period with a recurrence of 10 years is 1.0 ft 3 /s, calculated for the period 1955-75 (Gillespie and Schopp, 1982, p. 149).

Rhodehamel (1970, p. 6-7) estimated a long-term hydrologic budget for the entire Pinelands region, using the equation P = R + ET, where the average yearly precipitation, P, based on data collected from 1931-1964 was 45 in.; the average annual stream runoff, R, was 22.5 in.; and the estimated average annual evapotranspiration, ET, was 22.5 in.

Page 12: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Figure 2.--Idealized vertical section showing ground-water flow patterns in

th

e Pinelands (f

rom Rhodehamel, 1970,

figu

re 2)

.

Page 13: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Geology

The Pinelands region lies within the Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain physiographic province in southern New Jersey. The Coastal Plain deposits in New Jersey are mainly marine or nearshore sediments representing a series of transgressions and regressions ranging from Cretaceous to Tertiary time (Owens and Sohl, 1969). These marine sediments are overlain by discontinuous late Tertiary fluvial deposits (Owens and Minard, 1975). During the Quaternary Period, surficial sediments were transported from the Pinelands area by strong winds travelling south from the Pleistocene ice sheets, and by fluvial erosion. Deposition of sediments in the valleys resulted in a widespread inversion of topography (Rhodehamel, 1979a; Salisbury and Knapp, 1917); today, older stream deposits are present at higher altitudes, and younger deposits lie in the valleys (Rhodehamel, 1979a).

Cohansey Sand

McDonalds Branch basin is underlain by the Cohansey Sand, the youngest and most widespread of the marine Coastal Plain deposits (fig. 3). This formation, which reaches 250 ft (feet) in thickness, is underlain by the finer-grained Kirkwood Formation (Markewicz, 1969). The contact between the Cohansey Sand and the Kirkwood Formation is sharp and dips gently to the southeast at approximately 10 feet per mile (Minard and Owens, 1960).

In southern New Jersey, the Cohansey Sand probably was deposited in a deltaic environment (Owens and Sohl, 1969). Although lithologically variable, the Cohansey Sand is predominantly a yellow, limonitic, poorly sorted, quartz sand, interbedded with minor amounts of clays and silty and clayey sand. Minor amounts of feldspar, chert, vein quartz, and ironstone pebbles also are present. Ilmenite is present as a dominant heavy mineral in the area that includes the McDonalds Branch basin (Rhodehamel, 1979a; Markewicz, 1969).

Both parallel bedding and cross-stratification can be observed within the Cohansey Sand. In the area of McDonalds Branch basin, thick sequences of carbonaceous, irregularly shaped, lenticular and laminated clays also have been noted (Rhodehamel, 1979a). The clay lenses in McDonalds Branch basin are composed primarily of fine-grained quartz, kaolinite, and illite (table 1).

Beacon Hill Gravel

The Cohansey Sand is unconformably overlain by a thin, discontinuous veneer of the Beacon Hill Gravel (Owens and Minard, 1975), outcrops of which have been identified to the east of and within McDonalds Branch basin. The Beacon Hill Gravel was deposited by fluvial processes and is composed of coarse-grained quartz sand and gravel, with pebbles of vein quartz, quartzite, and fossiliferous chert (Minard, 1966). The Beacon Hill Gravel is more resistant to erosion than the underlying sandy formations and thus caps many of the hills in the Pinelands (Minard, 1966).

Page 14: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

39° 53'

39° 52'

39' 51'

74°30'

I

74°29'

<03o

o>h-

EXPLANATION

Organic deposits

Alluvium

Alluvium

Beacon Hill Gravel

Cohansey Sand

SCALE 1:24,000

0 1 MILE

Basin boundary 0 .5 1 KILOMETER

Figure 3.--Geology of the McDonalds Branch basin (modified from mapprepared by E. C. Rhodehamel, U.S. Geological Survey, 1965. Permission to publish given by E.G. Rhodehamel.)

Page 15: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 1.--Mineralogy of clay/fine-silt fractions of selected clay lenses in McDonalds Branch basin

Site number 1 Depth (feet)

Mineralogy2

Quartz Kaolinite Illite Mixed-layer 3expandable clay

QWH-5BQWH-5BCQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1C-6BC-6B

1039293030.53128-3339

44555454

44443343

32222221

1111ndndndnd

1 Site locations are shown in figures 8 and 9.

2 Relative amounts: 5 - Dominant, 4 - Abundant, 3 - Moderate, 2 - Small,1 - Trace, nd - None detected.Relative amounts for each sample determined from peak heights on diffractogram. The presence of gibbsite could not be positively determined due to the low intensity of possible gibbsite peaks.

3 Expandable clays present in amounts too small to permit separation into montmorillonite and vermiculite.

Page 16: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Tertiary and Quaternary Alluvium

Alluvial deposits of late Tertiary age are present in lowlands and valleys of McDonalds Branch basin (J. P. Owens, U.S. Geological Survey, oral commun., 1986). This alluvium consists of reddish- to yellowish-brown quartz sand which was eroded from the Cohansey Sand and was redeposited by mostly fluvial processes. Surficial sediments of Quaternary age also are present in scattered locations throughout the basin (Rhodehamel, 1979a; Owens and Minard, 1975). These sediments include alluvial and aeolian deposits, as well as dark-brown organic deposits which are located along stream beds and within undrained depressions (E. C. Rhodehamel, U.S. Geological Survey, written commun., 1965).

Soils

Markley (1979) describes 13 soil series that cover most of the Pinelands region. Seven of these soils have been mapped in McDonalds Branch basin (fig. 4). The distribution of the different soil series is determined largely by topographic position (figs. 4 and 5). Evesboro and Downer soils occupy the highest landscape positions, including the higher divides. Lakewood soils cover most of the upland portions of the basin; Lakehurst, Atsion, and Berryland soils occupy successively lower topographic positions. Muck soils lie within most of the McDonalds Branch stream channel. With the exception of the Muck, these soils are predominantly deep or loamy sands with moderate to rapid permeabilities (Markley, 1971; Markley, 1979). The available water capacity of the upland and transitional soils (Evesboro, Downer, Lakewood, and Lakehurst) is generally very low to low, and the available water capacity for the lowland and wetland soils is excessive (Markley, 1979). The seven soils are extremely to very strongly acidic, with pH values that generally range from 3.6 to 5.0 (Markley, 1979). In surface horizons, pH values may be as low as 3.0 (R. D. Yeck, U.S. Soil Conservation Service, written commun., 1985). Muck soils have moderate fertility, but the remaining soils have low to very low fertility. Selected chemical characteristics and particle-size distributions for four of the seven soils are shown in tables 2 and 3.

Series

Evesboro. Downer, and Lakewood Soils

Evesboro and Downer soils are found at some of the highest elevations in McDonalds Branch basin, and each covers approximately 9 percent of the basin. The Evesboro, a Typic Quartzipsamment 1 , is excessively drained, whereas the Downer, a Typic Hapludult, is well drained (Markley, 1971). The Lakewood is the predominant uplands soil, covering approximately 38 percent of the basin. This soil is a deep, excessively drained Spodic Quartzipsamment with a bleached horizon at least 7 in. thick (Markley, 1971). The three upland soils generally have low organic-matter content and support pitch pine-mixed oak forests. The Evesboro and Downer soils are more fertile than the Lakewood and support more oaks than pines. The Lakewood, which is more leached and acidic than the Downer or Evesboro soil, supports more pines than oaks.

x The classifications of these seven soils are based on criteria contained in U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1975 (Soil Taxonomy).

10

Page 17: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

39* S3 1

39° 52 1

39' 51 1

74°30t

I

74°29'

I

EXPLANATION

Lakewood soil

Lakewood soil, clay substratum

Lakehurst soil

Lakehurst soil, thick surface

Lakehurst soil, clay substratum

Atsion soil

Atsion-Berryland complex

Evesboro soil

Downer soil, thick surface0

Muck I-

Basin boundary

SCALE 1:24.000

1/2 1 MILE

1 KILOMETER

Figure 4.--Soils of McDonalds Branch basin (modified from Markley, 1955, figure 5).

11

Page 18: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

74°30'

39° 53'

39' 52'

39° 51'

74°29'

I

EXPLANATION

Basin boundary Stream

160 Topographic contour Datum is sea level

0

SCALE 1:24,000

1/2_____i_____

1 MILE

.5 1 KILOMETERCONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

Base from U.S. Geological Survey Brown Mills 1:24,000, 1971; Whiting 1:24,000, 1971; Chatsworth 1:24,000, 1957; Woodmansie 1:24,000, 1957

Figure 5.--Topography and surface-water drainage area of the MacDonalds Branch basin.

12

Page 19: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 2.--Chemical analyses of selected soils in McDonalds Branch basin*

[kg. kilograms; meq, mi 11{equivalents; g, grams; /ig, micrograms; cmol +/kg, centimoles ion charge per kilogram of soil; < indicates less than]

Soil series

At si on

At si on

Atsion

Lakehurst

Lakehurst

Lakehurst

Lakewood

Lakewood

Lakewood

Evesboro

Evesboro

Ho­ ri­ zon

Eft

Bh

C

E

Bh

C

E

B

C

A2

C

Depth (inches)

3-19

19-27

>27

3-17

17-19

>38

4-17

17-22

>36

2-7

7-24

(H203

4.5

4.1

4.5

4.4

4.5

4.6

4.3

4.5

4.8

4.1

4.5

PH i (CaCte )

3.6

3.7

4.3

3.4

4.0

4.3

3.5

4.2

4.6

3.4

4.4

Ex H+ (cmol +/kg)**

1.0

11.0

6.0

1.0

4.0

1.0

1.0

4.0

1.0

2.0

1.0

CEC (meq/ 100g)

<0.5

10.5

3.5

<.5

3.0

.5

<.5

3.0

<.5

1.5

1.0

OM

0.3

2.1

.9

.3

1.0

.3

.3

1.0

.3

.6

.4

Ca (meq/ 100g)

0.01

.04

.03

.02

.01

.01

.02

.02

.01

.03

.01

Mg (meq/ 100g)

0.004

.009

.005

.005

.006

.002

.006

.007

.003

.008

.005

K Na (meq/ (meq/ 100g) 100g)

0.004 <0.01

.005 .01

.003 <.01

.004 <.01

.004 <.01

.005 <.01

.001 <.01

.005 <.01

.001 <.01

.005 <.01

.008 <.01

Ex­ change­ able A I***

K1

397

91

11

79

19

7

58

12

31

26

Ex­ tract- able Al*

<!

1686

1484

55

1129

724

79

1661

482

164

1181

Ex­ tract- able Fe*

44

324

1311

41

2496

1390

333

4088

876

712

2110

Soluble S04-S <A*9 S/g)

<!

8

11

<1

<1

8

<1

3

<1

<1

"'

* Analyses were performed by the Agronomy Analytical Laboratory at Cornell University.

** Exchange acidity, expressed as centimoles of ion charge per kg of soil. These units are equivalent to meq/IOOg.

*** Extracted with 1N KCl.

* Extracted with citrate-dithionite.

ft See Glossary for soil-horizon definitions.

13

Page 20: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 3.--Particle-size distribution in Lakehurst. Lakewood. Atsion. and Evesboro soils in McDonalds Branch basin

[> indicates greater than, < indicates less than, mm indicates millimeter]

Percentage

Soil series

Soil horizon

Sand >230 mesh (>0.063 mm)

Medium to coarse silt 230-500 mesh (0.063-0.02 mm)

Fine silt/clay <500 mesh (<0.02 mm)

Lakehurst B3 98.4 0.4 1.2Lakehurst C 98.7 .1 1.2Lakewood B3 97.6 .4 2.0Lakewood C 98.1 .3 1.6Atsion B3 91.5 2.9 5.6Atsion C 90.6 3.3 6.1Evesboro Upper C 91.0 2.7 6.3Evesboro Lower C 89.9 2.8 7.4

14

Page 21: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Lakehurst Soil

The Lakehurst soil covers approximately 27 percent of the basin and generally occupies areas topographically below Lakewood and above Atsion soils. A Haplaquodic Quartzipsamment (Markley, 1979), the Lakehurst is moderately well to somewhat poorly drained and has a fluctuating water table that rises to about 2 ft below the land surface in late winter (Markley, 1971). The Lakehurst has a bleached E horizon at least 7 in. thick, has very low organic-matter content, and supports mostly pitch pine and oak, gum, and hickory.

Atsion. Berryland. and Muck Soils

Atsion, Berryland, and Muck soils occupy lowland and wetland areas, and together cover approximately 16 percent of the basin. The Atsion soil is a poorly drained Aerie Haplaquod; the Berryland is a very poorly drained Typic Haplaquod (Markley, 1971). In Atsion soils, the water table is at or near the surface during winter and spring (Markley, 1979). Berryland soils are usually saturated in winter and spring, and the water table is usually within 2 ft of the land surface in summer. The Atsion and Berryland soils have moderate and high organic-matter contents, respectively, and typically support pitch pine, red maple, and black gum. Scattered Atlantic white cedar can also be found on Berryland soils (Markley, 1971). In one area of the basin, the Atsion and Berryland soils are mapped as the "Atsion- Berryland complex" (fig. 4). Although these soils have different morphologies, they are not mapped separately in this area because of limitations of map scale (H. C. Smith, U.S. Soil Conservation Service, oral commun., 1986). The Atsion and Berryland soils have standard geomorphic association--the Atsion soils are present at slightly higher elevations than the Berryland soils.

Muck soil, which lies within most of the stream channel, generally con­ sists of 16 to 36 in. of decomposed organic matter over a sandy substratum (Markley, 1971; H. C. Smith, U.S. Soil Conservation Service, oral commun., 1986). This soil, classified as a Terric Medisaprist (Markley, 1979), usually is saturated and supports dense stands of Atlantic white cedar.

Soil Mineralogy

The mineralogy of Pinelands soils is discussed in detail by Douglas and Trela (1979). The sand and silt fractions are dominated by quartz, the dominant mineral of the Cohansey Sand. Heavy minerals, including ilmenite, leucoxene, zircon, rutile, anatase, staurolite, tourmaline, and chlorite, comprise one to two percent of the sand fraction. Sand and silt fractions contain less than 1 percent feldspar and muscovite (Douglas and Trela, 1979).

Clay-sized minerals in the Pinelands' soils include kaolinite, aluminum- interlayered dioctahedral vermiculite, aluminum-interlayered smectite (montmorillonite), and gibbsite (Douglas and Trela, 1979). The mineralogy of the clay/fine-silt fractions of selected soils in McDonalds Branch basin is shown in table 4. The data in table 4 are from X-ray diffraction analyses performed as part of this study and indicate the presence of illite and chlorite, as well as the minerals mentioned above.

15

Page 22: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 4.--Mineralogy of clay/fine-silt fractions of Lakehurst. Lakewood. Atsion. and Evesboro soils in McDonalds Branch basin

[Abbreviations: Qtz. = Quartz, Gibbs. Gibbsite, Kaol. = Kaolinite, 111. - Illite, Chlor. = Chlorite, Mont. = Aluminum-interlayered montmorillonite, Verm. = Aluminum-interlayered vermiculite]

Soil series

Soil horizon

Mineralogy 1

Qtz. Gibbs. Kaol. 111. Chlor. Mont. Verm.

LakehurstLakehurstLakewoodLakewoodAtsionAtsionAtsionEvesboroEvesboro

B3CB3CB2CIIC 3

Upper CLower C

333344433

112111111

555544233

nd31233311

ndndndnd123ndnd

ndndndnd33313

32 3

2212nd3nd

1 Relative amounts 5 = Dominant, 4 = Abundant, 3 = Moderate, 2 = Small,1 = Trace, nd None detected.Relative amounts for each sample determined from peak heights on diffractogram.

2 There is some evidence that vermiculite that is not interlayered may be present.

3Abrupt change in parent material from sand to compact clay.

16

Page 23: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Vegetation

The vegetation of the New Jersey Pinelands is unique in appearance and composition and has been described in detail by a number of authors (McCormick, 1979; Olsson, 1979; Olsvig and others, 1979; Good and others, 1979; Little, 1979; and Whittaker, 1979). Figure 6 is a map of the vegetation in McDonalds Branch basin. Because of the importance of these communities in determining the locations of the throughfall sampling stations used in this study, the various plant communities are described in detail below.

McCormick (1979) separated the vegetation into two distinct floristic complexes: an upland complex and a lowland complex. The depth to the water table is the primary factor that determines which complex occupies a particular region: upland complexes occupy areas where the water table always lies more than 2 ft below the surface, whereas lowland complexes occupy areas where the water table is near or above the land surface during at least a part of the year (McCormick, 1979). The location of the water table determines the availability of water to the root zone as well as the probability of fire and thus acts as a selective agent in determining which plant species will survive and dominate the plant community (Little, 1979).

Upland Complex

The plants of the upland complex cover approximately 85 percent of the Pinelands. Pitch and shortleaf pines (Pinus rigida. P. echinata) and blackjack, black, white, chestnut, and post oaks (Ouercus marilandica. Q. veluntina. 0. alba. 0. prinus. 0. stellata. respectively) dominate the canopy vegetation in the uplands. The understory contains largely lowbush blueberry, black huckleberry, and scrub oak. (See McCormick, 1979.)

Lowland Complex

The plants of the lowland complex cover approximately 10 to 15 percent of the Pinelands and include wetland communities and pitch-pine forests (McCormick, 1979). Three major wetland communities exist: Atlantic white- cedar swamp forests, broadleaf (hardwood) swamp forests, and shrubby wetland communities (Olsson, 1979; McCormick, 1979). In the first of these communities, Atlantic white cedar (Chamaecyparis thyoides) forms a dense upper canopy over a lower stratum of red maple (Acer rubrum), black gum (Nvssa sylvatica') , and sweetbay magnolia (Magnolia virginiana) (Olsson, 1979; McCormick, 1979). The undergrowth is composed of a variety of shrubs, including highbush blueberry, clammy azalea, and sweet pepperbush. The underlying peat and muck are covered with Sphagnum mosses and various herbs (McCormick, 1979).

Broadleaf swamp forests which consist of red maple, black gum, and sweetbay magnolia commonly border cedar swamp forests and the upper portions of small streams. The undergrowth includes such shrub species as highbush blueberry and sweet pepperbush. Spongy mats of Sphagnum mosses comprise portions of the ground layer.

17

Page 24: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

74°30' 74°29'

39° 53'

39° 52' EXPLANATION

Pine-oak forest

Oak-pine forest

Pine transition forest

Pitch pine lowland forest

Cedar swamp forest

HI Broadleaf (hardwood) swamp forest

Shrubby wetland community

Pond community0

Basin boundary i_____

SCALE 1:24.000

V2 1 MILE

39< 51' .5 1 KILOMETER

Figure 6.--Vegetation in McDonalds Branch basin (modified from McCormick, 1955, figures 2 and 3).

18

Page 25: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Shrubby wetland communities occur in wetland areas that are exposed to sunlight, such as the channels of intermittent streams and openings within cedar and broadleaf swamps. Sphagnum mosses form a dense ground cover below such shrubs as leatherleaf and highbush blueberry.

McCormick (1955) identified two regions that contain pond communities in McDonalds Branch basin, one in an intermittently ponded section of the streambed and another in a small depression (fig. 6). Various rooted hydrophytes are present in these pond communities, along with Sphagnum mats covered with rush and sedge species. Leatherleaf comprises a significant portion of the emergent vegetation.

Pitch-pine forests include pine-transition forests which occupy the transitional zones between upland forests and swamp forests, as well as pitch-pine lowland forests which are located in circular depressions and other poorly drained areas. The pine-transition forest is characterized by pitch pine in the canopy, and an understory of red maple, black gum, and gray birch. The shrub layer is dominated by sheep laurel and dangleberry. The pitch-pine lowland forest is similar to the transition forest, except that pines in the lowland forests are more dense and do not grow as tall as those of the transition forests. The lowland forests occupy slightly wetter areas than the transition forests and thus contain a larger percentage of shrubby-wetland-type vegetation and Sphagnum. (See McCormick, 1979.)

DATA COLLECTION

Network Design

During 1984-85, a network of water-quality and hydrologic data- collection sites was established in McDonalds Branch basin. The sites were located to best sample precipitation, throughfall, soil water, surface water, and ground water within the basin (figs. 7 to 9) . Table 5 summarizes the number of each type of sampling site.

Precipitation

Precipitation was collected at two sites, one at each of the topographically upper (upstream) and lower (downstream) ends of the basin (fig. 7). Each site was located in a cleared area and contained wet and bulk precipitation collectors and two rain gages. Wet precipitation was collected using the Aerochem Metrics 3012 automatic sensing wet/dry precipitation collector; this collector is recommended by the National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP) for collection of wet precipitation. A Belfort universal event-recording rain gage, 5-780 series, was connected to each Aerochem Metrics collector in order to record continuous precipitation volumes and the time and duration of precipitation events. Both the Aerochem Metrics collector and the Belfort gage were powered by 12- volt marine wet-cell batteries and installed on a wooden platform. The orifices of both the collector and the Belfort gage were positioned approximately 9 ft above the land surface. Elevation of the collecting orifice minimized contamination of samples by particulate matter and by precipitation rebounding from the forest floor or vegetative surfaces.

2Use of trade names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey.

19

Page 26: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 5.--Data-collection sites in McDonalds Branch basin

Type Number

Aerochem Metrics 301 wet/dryprecipitation collectors 2

Bulk precipitation collectors 2

Belfort event-recording rain gages 2

Plastic wedge rain gages 6

Throughfall collectors 4

Soil lysimeters 33

Water-quality wells 26

Water-level wells 43

Water-level recorders 4

Surface-water sites 10

Staff gages 3

U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Benchmarkstation (01466500) 1

20

Page 27: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

39° 53'

39° 52'

39° 51'

74° 30'

I

74° 29'

I

' "\

V PIT 12

(VPIT9 \

VPIT8

PIT7

\\

TF4PBJ WPIT6\

\ OPPT-2W.2B

VPIT4

EXPLANATION

O Precipitation site and name

V Throughfall site and name

V Soil-water site and name

Basin boundary

(_

SCALE 1:24,000

1/2_____i_____

1 MILE

0 .5 1 KILOMETER

Base from U.S. Geological Survey Brown Mills 1:24,000, 1971; Whiting 1:24,000, 1971; Chatsworth 1:24,000, 1957; Woodmansie 1:24,000, 1957

Figure 7.--Locations of precipitation, throughfall, and soil-water sampling sites in McDonalds Branch basin.

21

Page 28: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

39° 53'

39° 52'

39° 51'

74°30'

I

74°29'

U.S. Geological ">c-4 C-2A.2B Survey hydrologic**.. bench-mark station (01466500)

1000 FEET

300 METERS

V H-5A.5B^*»

'' ^ SG-H &3?c/> \

\ \

\\

EXPLANATION

£i Observation well and name

A Staff gage and name

Basin boundary

c

SCALE 1:24,000

1/2_____i_____

1 MILE

.5 1 KILOMETER

Base from U.S. Geological Survey Brown Mills 1:24,000, 1971; Whiting 1:24,000, 1971; Chatsworth 1:24,000, 1957; Woodmansie 1:24,000, 1957

Figure 8.--Locations of ground-water observation wells and staff gages in McDonalds Branch basin.

22

Page 29: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

74°30' 74°29'

39°53 s

39°52'

39°51'

ri B-Q

I I

^"~">

(..\

\ y^^S^8X^ ^"^V*^/S~10

VrS-7 IA QWC-5A.5B.Jj, QWC_ 1Af1B \

GAGING STATION^ . ^^^KS^^ '' ^ (01466500) "7 i7s_QWC-3A.3B ^

QWO-1A.1B-jJps-5 \/ f QWO-2A.2B

/ S"4 \^. QWO~3A-3B \

:

)

^

\

\°\o\- I %

8_3>ft QWH-5A.5B\

S"2 ^J .QWH-3A.3B ''«v^OWH-2A,2B^fQWH-4A,4B ' *.

\ S~ ~~ §£3Qch \

\. ^^^" \

X , ) -\ !

\ )m

EXPLANATION ) LEAD WELL '^

Water-quality well * '-^ \and name ' *-^.

V Surface-water quality site '-^ /and name or number " ^~...^s'

Basin boundary

_

SCALE 1:24.000

0 1/2 1 MILEI ' '0 .5 1 KILOMETER

i iBase from U.S. Geological Survey Brown Mills 1:24,000, 1971; Whiting 1:24,000, 1971; Chatsworth 1:24,000, 1957; Woodmansie 1:24,000, 1957

Figure 9.--Location of surface-water-quality sampling sites and water-quality wells in McDonalds Branch basin.

23

Page 30: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

The bulk collector (fig. 10) at each site was constructed from an inverted 20-L (liter) low-density polyethylene bottle with the bottom removed. The collector was connected with Tygon tubing to a 4-L collection bottle. The entire bulk collector assembly was attached to a wooden post, positioned so that the mouth of the collector was approximately 6 ft above the ground. A plastic wedge rain gage was attached to the back of the post.

In conformance with NADP protocol, the collectors were placed in a cleared area such that vegetation was not present above an angle of 45 degrees from the plane of the collector orifice. Such placement limited contamination of samples from vegetation and allowed for accurate measurement of precipitation volumes.

Two sets of wet collection buckets and bulk collectors were maintained for each site and rotated weekly. After six months of use, these buckets and bottles were replaced with new collecting buckets and bottles.

Throughfall

A variety of throughfall collector designs have been reviewed in the literature (Eaton and others, 1973; Clesceri and Vasudevan, 1980; Reigner, 1964; Reynolds and Leyton, 1963; Helvey and Patric, 1965a, 1965b; Wilson, 1950). A trough design was chosen to account for the spatial variability in throughfall chemistry and volume under a single canopy type (Reigner, 1964; Reynolds and Leyton, 1963; Helvey and Patric, 1965a and 1965b; A. H. Johnson, University of Pennsylvania, oral commun., 1984; 0. P. Bricker, U.S. Geological Survey, oral commun., 1985; M. Grant, University of Colorado, oral commun., 1985).

Four throughfall collectors were installed, one beneath each of the major canopy types in the basin: cedar swamp forest, hardwood swamp forest (red maple/black gum), pitch pine/black oak forest, and pitch pine/blackjack oak forest (fig. 7). Each trough was located beneath an area of relatively continuous canopy. The collectors (fig. 11) were constructed of 10-ft lengths of 4-in.-diameter Type I, schedule 80 polyvinylchloride (PVC) pipe, because of the PVC's chemical resistance and low cost (Barcelona and others, 1983). Each pipe was cut to make a longitudinal opening 2 in. wide; this cut allowed the trough to be slightly deeper and wider than its opening so as to minimize splashing. The trough opening was covered with polypropylene screening (mesh openings of .07 x .10 in. or 1.8 x 2.5 mm) to prevent foliage and debris from entering the collector. Each trough was braced along its length with PVC blocks and capped at its ends. Each trough was inclined at an angle of approximately 10 degrees and placed on wooden horses so that the trough outlet was about 3 ft above the ground surface.

Insulated Tygon tubing led from the outlet of the trough to a 20-L polyethylene collection bottle which was placed in an insulated wooden box. These boxes were left on the ground at the two swamp sites (cedar and broadleaf swamps) and were buried in the ground at the two upland sites (pine-oak forests). Inside the box, the tubing was looped, forming a vapor trap to minimize evaporation.

A plastic wedge rain gage was attached to each throughfall collector in order to measure throughfall volumes.

24

Page 31: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Wedge rain gage

Figure 10.--A typical bulk precipitation collector

25

Page 32: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Wedge rain gage

Figure 11.--A typical throughfall co

llector.

Page 33: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Soil Water

A variety of soil lysimeter designs have been described in the literature (Kohnke and others, 1940; Briggs and McCall, 1904; Wagner, 1962; Hansen and Harris, 1975; Cole, 1958; Zimmerman and others, 1978; and Jordan, 1966). The advantages and disadvantages of the various designs are reviewed by Jordan (1966), Leibfried (1982), Morrison (1983), and Turner (1983). A gravity trough lysimeter was developed for use in this study in order to (1) minimize contamination of the sample by the lysimeter material,(2) minimize adsorption of ions in solution to the lysimeter material, (3) minimize degassing and gas pressure changes, and (4) provide large sample volumes (0. P. Bricker, U.S. Geological Survey, oral commun., 1984).

A total of 33 soil lysimeters were installed in 12 pits in the basin to collect soil water (fig. 7). Three pits were located in areas covered by each of four soil series: Lakewood, Lakehurst, Atsion, and Evesboro. Lysimeters were placed at the bases of the 0, E, and B horizons of the Lakewood, Lakehurst, and Atsion soils, and at the bases of the A and C hori­ zons of the less well-developed Evesboro soil. Each lysimeter (fig. 12) was constructed of a 5-ft length of 4-in. diameter Type I, schedule 80 PVC pipe. One end of the pipe was left uncut and was capped; the remainder of the pipe was cut lengthwise to a tapered end to facilitate installation. In order to minimize soil disturbance during installation, lysimeters were pushed into the lower 0, E, and B horizons using a modified truck jack. All lysimeters were installed at an angle of approximately 5 degrees from horizontal.

After installation, a hose barb containing nylon netting was inserted into the outlet of the lysimeter to prevent movement of soil particles into the collection bottle. Tygon tubing containing a check valve led from this outlet to a polypropylene collection bottle. Two additional tubes (to be used for sample collection) led from the collection bottle to the ground surface. The pit was then backfilled so that collection bottles and tubing were buried. Samples were evacuated using argon gas to prevent exposure to the atmosphere. Several problems were encountered with this design, including (1) development of holes in the tubing, (2) gas leaks from holes and fittings, (3) inability to collect a sample when some may have been present, and (4) inability to rinse collection bottles between sampling rounds. Therefore, this design was used only from October 1984 through October 1985. In late October 1985, this collection system was replaced by a simpler system in which a polypropylene bottle, connected to the lysimeter by Tygon tubing, was placed in a buried plastic trash can (fig. 12).

Surface Water

Surface water was sampled from up to 10 sites on McDonalds Branch. These samples included water that flowed through three types of wetlands: broadleaf swamp, pond community, and cedar swamp (see figs. 6 and 9). During the sampling period (January 24, 1985 through March 21, 1986), portions of the stream were dry at times because of drought conditions. Therefore, not all sites were sampled during each sampling round. In addition, sampling was discontinued at some sites because of chemical similarities among sites. Stream-stage levels were recorded monthly at three sites and continuously recorded at the gaging station. Figure 8 shows the locations of staff gages.

27

Page 34: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

ro CO

Figu

re 12

.--A

typical

soil

lysimeter.

Inse

rt shows

the

soil-water

samp

le co

llec

tion

bottle

which

was

used from Fe

brua

ry

to October

1985

.

Page 35: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Ground Water

The ground-water-quality network was designed to collect samples from the water-table aquifer along transects that were roughly coincident with paths of ground-water flow, from recharge to discharge areas.

During 1984, a network of ground-water observation wells was installed to determine the configuration of the water table and to define the direction of ground-water flow in each of the three transect areas (fig. 8). These areas are referred to in this report as the "hardwood (broadleaf) swamp," the "open channel" (a pond community), and the "cedar swamp." Wells in the hardwood-swamp transect contain an "H" in their site names, wells in the open-channel transect contain an "0" in their site names, and wells in the cedar-swamp transect contain either a "C" or "CQ" in their site names. The observation wells were constructed of 0.5-in.-diameter Type I schedule 80 PVC pipe with 3 ft of hacksaw slotted PVC screen and were capped at the top and bottom. Well-construction data are given in table 6. Nested wells were installed adjacent to the swamps and where clay lenses were found, in order to examine vertical head gradients.

Water-quality wells then were installed along hypothetical ground-water flow paths in each area (fig. 9). A pair of wells was installed at each well site to assess vertical head gradients and to determine differences in ground-water chemistry at various depths. At each site, a shallow well was screened just below the water table, and a deeper well was screened approximately 20 ft below the water table.

In addition to these wells installed along flow paths, three wells (QWH- 5A, QWH-5B, and the lead well) were installed later in the study (fig. 9). QWH-5A and QWH-5B were installed adjacent to a swampy upland area to sample water chemistry at that location. The lead well was installed downgradient of a large gravel pit to determine whether ground water in that area contained elevated lead concentrations.

The water-quality wells were constructed of 2-in.-diameter, flush- joint, Type I, schedule 80 PVC casings and screens. Each well was screened at the bottom with a 3-ft length of 0.010- or 0.025-in. machine-slotted PVC. All wells were capped at the top and bottom. Well-construction data are shown in table 7. All wells were installed using a portable power auger combined with casing-driving techniques. Local sand was used as backfilling material. Analog-to-digital recorders were installed on four water-quality wells in the basin.

Hydrologic Data

Precipitation volumes were recorded continuously by the Belfort rain gages. Precipitation and throughfall volumes also were recorded weekly from plastic wedge rain gages at the time of sampling.

Stream-stage levels were recorded continuously at the gaging station (U.S. Geological Survey station no. 01466500), and daily stream discharges were computed on the basis of measured stage-discharge relationships. Stream-stage levels also were measured at three other sites on the stream at the time of sample collection.

29

Page 36: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 6.--Construction data for water-level observation wells

Site name 1

H-1H-2H-3AH-3BH-3CH-4H-5AH-5B

0-1A0-1B0-20-30-40-5A0-5B0-60-70-80-90-100-1 1A0-11B

CQ-1CQ-2CQ-3ACQ-3BCQ-4CQ-5CQ-6CQ-7CQ-8CQ-9CQ-10CQ-11

C-1C-2AC-2BC-3C-4C-5AC-5BC-6AC-6B

Altitude of land surface (feet)*

137.2138.0138.2138.1138.1138.1132.8132.7

134.7134.7137.5146.7137.9127.5127.4130.4128.0134.7134.3130.3139.3139.4

143.3138.7125.8125.9152.9132.2155.8132.5145.1142.5132.1150.9

141.4141.3141.1138.7138.2121.0120.8141.6141.7

Depth of well (feet) 3

12.012.19.013.725.314.57.719.0

18.529.023.333.119.07.016.311.810.714.414.28.917.729.5

30.529.05.616.036.018.038.818.028.227.514.630.4

27.021.630.229.020.65.516.715.927.0

Casing and screen material

PVC 4PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC

PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC

PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC

PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC

Diameter of

screened interval (inches)

0.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.52.0.5.5.5.5.5.5.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

.5

Depth to Top of screened interval (feet) 3

9.09.16.010.722.311.54.716.0

15.526.020.330.116.04.013.38.87.711.411.25.914.726.5

27.526.02.613.033.015.035.815.025.224.511.627.4

24.018.627.226.017.62.513.712.924.0

Depth to bottom of screened interval, (feet) 3

12.012.19.013.725.314.57.719.0

18.529.023.333.119.07.016.311.810.714.414.28.917.729.5

30.529.05.616.036.018.038.818.028.227.514.630.4

27.021.630.229.020.65.516.715.927.0

Date well constructed

5/18/846/22/846/15/845/18/846/15/845/18/846/15/846/15/84

5/22/846/21/845/24/846/14/845/24/846/21/846/21/845/31/848/02/84E8/06/845 8/06/848/06/848/06/848/22/84

6/06/846/06/846/06/846/14/846/14/846/14/848/08/848/08/848/31/848/22/848/31/848/02/84

6 5/31/845/31/845/31/846/01/846/01/846/01/846/01/846/21/846/21/84

1 Well locations are shown in figure 8.^ Referenced to sea level.f Referenced to land surface.* Type I, Schedule 80 polyvinylchloride (PVC).° Well was found vandalized on 1/30/85, reinstalled to original depth, and then resurveyed on 3/28/85.0 Well was found vandalized on 1/30/85, reinstalled to original depth, and then resurveyed on 3/29/85.

30

Page 37: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 7.--Construction data for water-quality wells

Site name 1

QWH-1AQWH-1BQWH-2AQWH-2BQWH-3AQWH-3B5QWH-4AQWH-4BQWH-5AQWH-5B

QWO-1AQWO-1BQWO-2AQWO-2BQWO-3AQWO-3B5

QWC-1AQWC-1BQWC-2AQWC-2BQWC-3A5QWC-3B5QWC-4QWC-5AQWC-5B

LEAD WELL

Altitude of land surface (feet) 2

131.7131.4133.0133.1138.5138.6135.6135.6148.6148.6

125.4125.7127.7127.7132.2132.3

124.9125.0126.9127.0138.9138.9144.2132.7132.6

172.7

Depth of well (feet) 3

5.529.611.831.316.729.916.135.615.340.9

6.323.26.9

21.616.431.5

7.928.76.1

26.421.836.625.716.136.5

44.6

Casing and screen

material

PVC 4PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC

PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC

PVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVC

PVC

Diameter of

screened interval (inches)

2.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0

2.02.02.02.02.02.0

2.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0

2.0

Depth to top of

screened interval (feet) 3

2.526.68.8

28.313.726.913.132.612.337.9

3.320.23.9

18.613.428.5

4.925.73.1

23.418.833.622.713.133.5

41.6

Depth to bottom of screened interval (feet) 3

5.529.611.831.316.729.916.135.615.340.9

6.323.26.9

21.616.431.5

7.928.76.1

26.421.836.625.716.136.5

44.6

Date well constructed

08/24/198408/24/198408/30/198408/10/198408/31/198408/14/198408/30/198408/30/198409/19/198509/19/1985

08/17/198408/17/198408/09/198408/09/198408/15/198408/15/1984

09/26/198409/26/198409/06/198409/06/198409/06/198409/06/198409/25/198409/24/198409/24/1984

09/18/1985

1 Well locations are shown in figure 9.2 Referenced to national geodetic vertical datum of 1929.3 Referenced to land surface (or to muck surface for swamp wells QWH-1A, QWH-1B,

QWO-1A, QWO-1B, QWC-1A, andQWC-lB).4 Type I, Schedule 80 polyvinylchloride (PVC).5 Continuous water-level measurements made at site.

31

Page 38: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Ground-water levels were recorded continuously at four wells in the basin: QWH-3B, QWO-3B, QWC-3A, and QWC-3B, and manually measured monthly at 65 wells. Manual water-level measurements were recorded at all wells at the time of sample collection. Measurements were made at water-level observation wells using the wetted-steel-tape method, and at water-quality wells using an electric tape.

Water-Quality Data Collection, Processing, and Preservation

Equipment Preparation

Before use in the field, all sample-collection devices and storage bottles, excluding well casings and screens, were scrubbed with phosphate- free laboratory detergent and tap water, and rinsed thoroughly with tap water. The equipment then received a minimum of three rinses with deionized water having a specific conductance of less than 0.05 /zS/cm (microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius). This washing procedure was followed by an overnight soak in dilute hydrochloric acid; 0.1 N (normal) hydrochloric acid (HC1) was used for all precipitation, throughfall, and soil-water collection buckets, bottles, and compositing bottles as well as surface-water churns and all fittings and tubings. Soil lysimeters and throughfall collector troughs were soaked in 0.001 N HC1 (pH =3). All equipment was then rinsed with deionized water at least six times and allowed to dry thoroughly before use in the field. Equipment subjected to one of the above procedures is referred to as "acid-rinsed" in the remainder of this report.

All water-collection equipment, excluding ground-water pumps and hoses, was acid-rinsed before each use in the field. Prior to use, all sample bottles excluding dissolved organic carbon (DOC) were rinsed three times with deionized water, followed by one to three rinses with sample solution, depending on the amount of sample available. Plastic gloves were worn during the installation of equipment and sampling, where appropriate and technically feasible. In order to maintain cleanliness, any exposed or unsealed sampling equipment that would come in contact with water samples was transported to and from the field in clean, closed plastic bags or coolers. Surface-, ground-, and soil-water samples were transported from the field in coolers filled with ice.

Precipitation and Throughfall

Precipitation and throughfall samples were collected weekly, stored at 4 °C, and composited monthly into single samples. In the field, collection buckets and bottles were removed, sealed, and placed in clean plastic bags for transport to the District laboratory. These containers were replaced with clean, acid-rinsed buckets and bottles following each collection. Throughfall collector troughs and screens were cleared of debris and rinsed thoroughly with deionized water. Plastic gloves were worn while handling all bottles, buckets, and troughs.

In the District laboratory, weekly samples were composited into a single monthly sample. Specific conductance and pH determinations were made on filtered composite samples in the District laboratory at the time of sample processing. The composite samples were filtered using a peristaltic pump

32

Page 39: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

through 0.45-jura (micrometer) Gelman filters for laboratory pH, specific conductance, cations, anions, and trace metals. Throughfall was also filtered through 0.45-jum Selas silver filters for DOC analysis. Samples for metals analysis were acidified to a pH of less than 2 with nitric acid. All samples were preserved by chilling to 4 °C. Table 8 is a summary of sample types, frequency of collection, and chemical constituents analyzed for all samples collected. Alkalinity titrations were performed at the District laboratory within six months of collection.

Soil Water

Soil water was collected monthly from any of the 33 soil lysimeters in the basin that contained water. From October 1984 through October 1985, samples were flushed from the buried collection bottles using purified argon gas and collected in acid-rinsed polypropylene bottles. From November 1985 through March 1986, collection bottles were detached from the lysimeters, and samples were poured into acid-rinsed, high-density polyethylene bottles. Collection bottles were rinsed with deionized water and reconnected to the lysimeters. During the entire sampling period, samples were chilled and brought to the District laboratory for processing.

In the District laboratory, soil-water samples were filtered, acidified where appropriate, and chilled, as described above. Specific conductance and pH were measured in the laboratory, unless sample volumes were insufficient. When sample volumes were large, alkalinity determinations were also made at the District laboratory, within 6 months of collection. During the first year of data collection, small samples from the same horizon of a particular soil series were sometimes composited to provide a volume of sample sufficient for analysis.

Surface Water

Surface-water samples were collected monthly from up to 10 sites on McDonalds Branch. Grab samples were collected from the stream using an acid-rinsed polyethylene bottle and transported to the sampling vehicle in an acid-rinsed churn. Temperature, specific conductance, pH, and dissolved oxygen concentration were measured on raw samples at the time of collection. Samples were filtered in the field using a peristaltic pump, bottles for metals analysis were acidified, and samples were chilled for preservation, as described above. Collection and processing of samples, and measurement of pH and specific conductance were performed following protocol developed for the Aquatic Effects Task Group, Interagency Task Force on Acid Precipitation (0. P. Bricker, U.S. Geological Survey, written commun.,1984).

Ground Water

Ground-water samples were collected monthly from January through the first week of June 1985 and bimonthly thereafter. All wells were pumped and sampled using positive displacement mechanical pumps (Johnson-Keck and Fultz pumps) in order to preserve the integrity of the ground-water samples for analysis of chemical constituents under evaluation (Barcelona and others,1985). Pumps were fitted with Teflon tubing to minimize contamination. Discharge was diverted as far from all nearby sampling sites as possible.

33

Page 40: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 8.--Summary of collection and analysis of samples from McDonalds Branch basin

Water-sample type

Number of sites

Frequency of sampling

Analyses performed

Wet precipitation

Bulk precipitation

Throughfall

Soil water

Surface water

4 soils series

3 pits per series 0, A/E, B horizons, (0/A, C, Evesboro)

up to 10

Ground water

Shallow and deep 26 wells wells

Collected weekly.

Composited monthly

Collected weekly. Composited monthly

Collected weekly.

Composited monthly

Monthly

Monthly

Monthly for 6 months,

then bimonthly

Major cations (calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium) and anions (sulfate. chloride, fluoride, bromide), aluminum, lead, alkalinity, pH, specific conductance, nutrients (ammonium, phosphate, nitrate)

Maior cations and anions, aluminum, lead, alkalinity, pH, specific conductance, nutrients

Major cations and anions, aluminum, iron, manganese, lead, silica, alkalinity, pH, specific conductance, dissolved organic carbon, nutrients

Major cations and anions, aluminum, iron, lead. pH, specific conductance, silica, alkalinity, dissolved organic carbon, nutrients

Major cations and anions, aluminum, iron, manganese, lead, silica, alkalinity, dissolved oxygen, pH, specific conductance, dissolved organic carbon, nutrients

Major cations and anions, aluminum, iron, manganese, lead, silica, alkalinity, dissolved oxygen, pH, specific conductance, dissolved organic carbon, nutrients

34

Page 41: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Temperature, pH, and dissolved oxygen were measured in a flow-through chamber at regular intervals during pumping (Wood, 1976). Specific conductance also was measured during pumping. Each well was pumped to waste until these field characteristics stabilized. Upon stabilization of the characteristics, field measurements of pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen, and specific conductance were recorded. Ground water was then passed directly through the appropriate 0.45-^m filters and into sample bottles. Bottles for metals analysis were acidified immediately and all samples were chilled to 4 °C for preservation.

ANALYTICAL METHODS

Equipment Specifications

In the field, pH was measured with an Orion Model 231 digital pH meter fitted with a Ross glass combination electrode; in the laboratory, a Beckmann model PHI 21 pH meter and a Beckman Futura II star series epoxy- body combination electrode were used. Beckman standard-quality buffers of pH 4.00 and 7.00 (at 25 °C) were used to calibrate the pH meters. In the field, calibration and determination of electrode slope from millivolt data were performed prior to sample collection at each site. In the laboratory, calibration was performed at least once daily. A solution of 5x10~ s M (molar) sulfuric acid with a pH of 4 was used to check meter accuracy. Prior to measuring the pH of either a sample or a standard solution, the pH probe was rinsed with deionized water, followed by a rinse with a small amount of the solution itself.

In both the field and the laboratory, a Kent Model MC-1, Mark V conductivity meter was used to measure specific conductance. This meter was calibrated once daily, before use in either the field or the laboratory. The field measurement of dissolved-oxygen (DO) concentration was performed using a YSI Model 58 digital dissolved-oxygen meter. The DO meter was recalibrated at each site in the field prior to use.

Chemical Analysis

The majority of chemical analyses reported in this study were performed at the U.S. Geological Survey Central Laboratory in Arvada, Co. Some samples from October 1985 were analyzed at the U.S. Geological Survey National Water-Quality Laboratory in Doraville, Ga. Methods used for inorganic analyses are described in Fishman and Friedman (1985) and Skougstad and others (1979). Several constituents were analyzed using two different methods depending on the concentrations. Major cations, including calcium, magnesium, sodium, and potassium along with iron, manganese, and silica were analyzed using either atomic-absorption spectrometry (AA) or inductively-coupled plasma emission spectroscopy (ICP). Aluminum and lead were analyzed using AA until December 1985, and aluminum was analyzed using directly-coupled plasma emission spectroscopy (DCP) beginning in December 1985. Beginning in November 1985, lead was analyzed using an atomic- absorption spectrophotometer equipped with a graphite furnace. Ammonium was determined using colorimetry. Anions, including sulfate, chloride, fluoride, bromide, nitrate, and phosphate were analyzed using ion

35

Page 42: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

chromatography. Nitrate, phosphate, and chloride also were analyzed using colorimetry, and sulfate using turbidimetry. Dissolved organic carbon concentration (DOC) was determined by wet oxidation using the method described in Goerlitz and Brown (1972).

Alkalinity and acidity were measured both at the Central Laboratory and in the District laboratory using electrometric titrimetry. The equipment and procedure used in the District laboratory are described in Barringer and Johnsson (U.S. Geological Survey, written commun., 1986), and the titrations were performed using the technique developed by Gran (1952). The Central Laboratory used either fixed end-point titrations (Fishman and Friedman, 1985) or incremental titrations with alkalinity calculated by the second derivative method (Peters and others, 1974).

Mineralogic Analysis

Mineralogy of depositional clay lenses and soil clays in the basin was determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. The analyses were performed on a Siemens model U8-006 X-ray diffractometer at Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J., using nickel-filtered copper radiation. Background radiation was determined by scanning a clean glass slide. Peak positions were calibrated using quartz and other reference samples from the National Bureau of Standards. Samples were prepared by wet sieving and ultrasonic disaggregation to remove sand and medium-to-coarse silt particles. In a modification of the method described in Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 1 (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1984), the clay/fine-silt fraction was treated with sodium hexametaphosphate, sonified, and allowed to settle. The < (less than) 5-/*m fraction was removed using a pipette. The solution containing this <5-/*m fraction then was passed through a 0.45-/wn Gelman filter, and the residue remaining on the filter was applied to a glass slide using a filter-peel method.

Further sample treatment included saturation with magnesium to improve peak resolution (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1984). Treatment for identification of vermiculite and montmorillonite included saturation with KC1, heating to 250 °C and 375 °C (Black and others, 1965), and exposure to ethylene glycol (Warshaw and Roy, 1961). Interlayer aluminum was extracted with sodium citrate (Tamura, 1958). Mineralogy of the sand fraction of soils was determined by examination of sieved samples using a binocular microscope.

Soil Analysis

Analysis of selected soils was performed by the Agronomy Analytical Laboratory at Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. Most of the analytical methods used are described in Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 1 (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1984) or in Black and others (1965). Soil pH was determined in both water and CaCl2 . The exchangeable calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium were extracted with ammonium acetate (NH4OAc) at a pH of 7.0 and analyzed by AA. The cation-exchange capacity (CEC) also was determined by extraction in 1 N NH4OAc at a pH of 7.0. The soluble sulfate was extracted with acid ammonium acetate and concentration determined turbidimetrically. Iron and aluminum concentrations were determined by citrate-dithionite extraction, and aluminum also was extracted with 1 N KC1

36

Page 43: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

(exchangeable Al). Exchange acidity was determined by extraction with a barium chloride/triethanolamine solution buffered to pH 8.0 followed by titration of the excess base. Percent organic matter was determined using a modification of the Walkley-Black procedure, as described by Heanes (1984).

QUALITY ASSURANCE

The water-quality data generated by the U.S. Geological Survey laboratories were subjected to the standard quality-assurance procedures in use at the time of analysis (Friedman and Erdmann, 1982; Fishman and Friedman, 1985). In addition, duplicate samples and blanks were sent to the laboratory for analysis. Duplicate samples comprised approximately 10 percent of the total number of surface- and ground-water samples. The percentages of duplicate precipitation, throughfall, and soil-water samples were smaller, because drought conditions during the study often resulted in collection of insufficient sample volumes. Duplicate values generally agreed within 1 percent. Constituent values that differed by more than 10 percent generally were at or near the detection limit of the particular analytical method employed.

Ten wash blanks of deionized water were processed according to the appropriate method and analyzed; results are shown in table 9. These blanks include deionized water samples stored for one week in precipitation collectors. The majority of parameters were below detection limits in all blanks. A limited number of values were reported at or near the detection limits. Lead was the only constituent that had concentrations frequently above the detection limit. Leaching of lead from a newly installed plumbing modification in the District laboratory (copper tubing joined with lead-tin solder) appeared to be the source of lead (G. R. Kish, U.S. Geological Survey, oral commun., 1986).

Quality assurance for alkalinity determinations performed in the District laboratory included analysis of duplicate and triplicate samples, and analysis of samples of known alkalinity (J. L. Barringer and P. A. Johnsson, U.S. Geological Survey, written commun., 1986). Agreement between duplicate and triplicate samples was within 5 percent for most samples. However, reproducibility for ground-water samples was relatively poor, ranging from 13 to 54 percent. Alkalinity determinations performed at the District laboratory on samples of known alkalinity were approximately 3 percent of the known values.

To check quality assurance of data reported and stored in the WATSTORE data base, all data were analyzed using a computer program called ARCHEM.F77 (Johnsson and Lord, 1987). This program was developed specifically for the low-pH, low-ionic strength, organic-rich waters present in the Pinelands. The program performs the following calculations which are described by Johnsson and Lord (1987), Friedman and Erdmann (1982), and Hem (1985):

1. the ion balance between cations (including trace metals) and anions (including the organic anion3 ),

3 The concentration of the organic anion was calculated from the pH and the DOC using the method of Oliver and others (1983).

37

Page 44: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 9.--Chemical analysis of wash blanks. January 1985 through December 1986

[/is/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; meq/L, mi Hiequivalents per liter; mg/L, milligrams per liter; /Jg/L, micrograms per liter; lab, laboratory; - indicates missing data; < indicates less than]

Type of blank

Bulk precipitation Wet precipitation Bulk precipitationWet precipitation

Ground waterGround waterGround waterGround waterGround water

Soil water

Type of blank

Bulk precipitation Wet precipitation Bulk precipitationWet precipitation

Ground waterGround waterGround waterGround waterGround water

Sample- collection

dates

07/23/1985 07/23/1985 07/23/198507/23/1985

02/11/198506/26/198508/27/198510/29/198512/23/1985

03/12/1985

Sample- collection dates

07/23/1985 07/23/1985 07/23/198507/23/1985

02/11/198506/26/198508/27/198510/29/198512/23/1985

Specific pH conductance Alkalinity Dissolved

(units) (/is/cm) (meq/L) organic District Central District Central District carbon

lab lab lab lab lab (mg/l)

5.4 5.6 5.55.6

Calcium (mg/L)

< 0.01 < .01 < .01< .01

.05< .02< .02< .02

.010

5.2 5.5 5.45.5

7.56.85.65.35.79

5.4

Magnesium (mg/L)

0.01 .01 .01.01

.01

.02< .02< .01< .010

2 1 51

...

... <

...

...

...

Sodium (mg/L)

< 0.01 .02 .02.02

< .2< .2< .2< .2< .20

2 2 31

4: 2

111.3

2

Potassium (mg/L)

.03

.08

.02

.03

.02

.03

.03< .01< .01

< 1 < 1 < 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 0.5

2.0

Aluminum (/ig/L)

< 10 10

< 10< 10

< 10< 10< 10< 10

8

...

...

0.2.5.3

1.6.2

.7

Iron (/ig/D

...

...

44

< 3< 33.2

Lead (/ig/D

5 10 87

4311

< .5

10

Manganese (/ig/L)

...

...

4< 1< 1< 1< 1.0

Soil water 03/12/1985 .02 .01 .2 .01 < 10 < 3

Type of blank

Bulk precipitation Wet precipitation Bulk precipitation Wet precipitation

Ground water Ground water Ground water Ground water Ground water

Sample- collection dates

07/23/1985 07/23/1985 07/23/1985 07/23/1985

02/11/1985 06/26/1985 08/27/1985 10/29/1985 12/23/1985

Sulfate (mg/L)

< 0.01 < .01 < .01

.02

< .01 < .01

.04 < .01

.09

Chloride (mg/L)

0.16 < .01

.20 < .01

< .01 < .01

.10 < .01 < .01

Fluor ide (mg/L)

0.01 .01 .01 .01

< .10 < .01 < .01

.02 < .01

Bromide (mg/L)

AAAAA AAAA

OOOOO 0000

Nitrate (mg/L)

AAAAA AAAA

OOOOO OOOO

Phosphate (mg/L)

< 0.001

Silica (mg/L)

0.08 .01

< .01 < .01

.03

Soil water 03/12/1985 .04 .12 .01 .01 .02 .01

38

Page 45: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

2. the difference in measured specific conductance versus calculated specific conductance,

3. the ratio of the calculated sum of dissolved constituents to the measured specific conductance, and

4. the ratios of hydrogen-ion activity calculated from field pH tohydrogen-ion activity calculated from lab pH, and of field specific conductance to lab specific conductance.

Samples that failed the cation/anion balance by 30 percent or more were deleted from the data base (Friedman and Erdmann, 1982).

The Agronomy Analytical Laboratory at Cornell University used standard quality-control procedures for soils analysis. The laboratory analyzed replicate samples for approximately 10 percent of samples analyzed for aluminum, CEC, and exchangeable cations. Master soil samples also were run for most analyses. For every set of 50 samples analyzed, pH meters were recalibrated.

HYDROLOGIC AND WATER-QUALITY DATA

Hydrologic and water-quality data were collected from January 1985 through March 1986 as part of a study of the effects of acidic deposition on the geochemistry of McDonalds Branch basin in the New Jersey Pinelands. The hydrologic and water-quality data are available from the U.S. Geological Survey WATSTORE computer storage system. Table 10 is a list of the site names and WATSTORE identification numbers used by the U.S. Geological Survey computer storage and retrieval system.

Hydrologic Data

Hydrologic data, including rainfall and throughfall amounts, stream- stage measurements, ground-water elevations, daily stream discharge, and well hydrographs are presented in tables 11-16 and figures 13-18 (at end of report). Figure 7 shows the locations of the two precipitation sites containing the two Belfort event-recording rain gages and two plastic wedge rain gages used to record rainfall to the basin. Figure 7 also shows the locations of the throughfall sites containing the plastic wedge rain gages used to record throughfall amounts. The locations of ground-water observation wells and staff gages are shown in figure 8.

Water-Quality Data

Water-quality data from the 2 wet precipitation collectors, 2 bulk precipitation collectors, 4 throughfall collectors, 33 soil lysimeters, 26 water-quality wells, and 10 surface-water sites in the basin are reported in tables 17-21 (at end of report). Statistical summaries of precipitation, surface-water, and ground-water-quality data are presented in tables 22-24 (at end of report), respectively. The locations of precipitation, throughfall, and soil-water sampling sites are shown in figure 7. The locations of surface-water sampling sites and water-quality wells are shown in figure 9.

39

Page 46: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 10.--WATSTORE site-identification numbers and site descriptions for water-quality sites in HcDonaldsBranch basin

Site name 1

PPT-1WC PPT-1BC

PPT-2W PPT-2B

TF-1C

TF-2PB

TF-3H

TF-4PBJ

PIT-1-LIO PIT-1-LIA PIT-1-LIB

PIT-2-LIO PIT-2-LIA PIT-2-LIB

PIT-3-LaO PIT-3-LaA PIT-3-LaB

PIT-4-LuO PIT-4-LuA PIT-4-LuB

PIT-5-LtO PIT-5-LtA PIT-5-LtB

PIT-6-LuO PIT-6-LuA PIT-6-LuB

PIT-7-AuO PIT-7-AuA PIT-7-AuB

PIT-8-AuO PIT-8-AuA PIT-8-AuB

PIT-9-AuO PIT-9-AuA PIT-9-AuB

PIT-10-EvO/A PIT-10-EvC

PIT-11-EvO/A PIT-11-EvC

PIT-12-EvO/A PIT-12-EvC

S-1

S-2

S-3

S-4

S-5

WATSTORE site- identification number-^ Site description

Precipitation sites

395304074300931 Wet precipitation, cedar hill site 395304074300932 Bulk precipitation, cedar hill site

395153074290731 Wet precipitation, Rogers' Road site 395153074290732 Bulk precipitation, Rogers' Road site

Throughfall sites

395302074295021 Cedar-swamp forest

395232074295421 Pine-oak forest (pitch pine/black oak)

395216074294121 Hardwood -swamp forest

395203074283521 Pine-oak forest (pitch pine/blackjack oak)

Soil -water sites

395246074295211 Lakehurst sand, thick surface, 0 horizon 395246074295212 Lakehurst sand, thick surface, A horizon 395246074295213 Lakehurst sand, thick surface, B horizon

395218074294011 Lakehurst sand, thick surface, 0 horizon 395218074294012 Lakehurst sand, thick surface, A horizon 395218074294013 Lakehurst sand, thick surface, B horizon

395257074294111 Lakehurst sand, 0 horizon 395257074294112 Lakehurst sand, A horizon 395257074294113 Lakehurst sand, B horizon

395146074285011 Lakewood sand, thick surface, 0 horizon 395146074285012 Lakewood sand, thick surface, A horizon 395146074285013 Lakewood sand, thick surface, B horizon

395232074295411 Lakewood sand, 0 horizon 395232074295412 Lakewood sand, A horizon 395232074295413 Lakewood sand, B horizon

395203074283511 Lakewood sand, thick surface, 0 horizon 395203074283512 Lakewood sand, thick surface, A horizon 395203074283513 Lakewood sand, thick surface, B horizon

395210074285511 Atsion sand, loamy substratum, 0 horizon 395210074285512 Atsion sand, loamy substratum, A horizon 395210074285513 Atsion sand, loamy substratum, B horizon

395218074290211 Atsion sand, loamy substratum, 0 horizon 395218074290212 Atsion sand, loamy substratum, A horizon 395218074290213 Atsion sand, loamy substratum, B horizon

395229074291311 Atsion sand, loamy substratum, 0 horizon 395229074291312 Atsion sand, loamy substratum, A horizon 395229074291313 Atsion sand, loamy substratum, B horizon

395247074293211 Evesboro sand, 0 and A horizons 395247074293212 Evesboro sand, C horizon

395300074301211 Evesboro sand, 0 and A horizons 395300074301212 Evesboro sand, C horizon

395253074290011 Evesboro sand, 0 and A horizons 395253074290012 Evesboro sand, C horizon

Surface-water sites

395216074294000 Surface water in hardwood swamp at well transect

395220074294500 Surface water in hardwood swamp just upstream from Butler Place Road

395222074294700 Surface water in hardwood swamp downstream from Butler Place Road

395248074295700 Surface water at upstream edge of open channel

395250074295500 Surface water in middle of open channel at well transect

40

Page 47: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 10.--WATSTORE site-identification numbers and site descriptions for water-quality sites in McDonalds Branch basin--Continued

Site name ]

WATSTORE site- identification number2 Site description

Surface-water sites, continued

395254074295000 Surface water at downstream edge of the open channel

395302074295000 Surface water in cedar swamp at well transect

395308074301000 Surface water in cedar swamp

395305074301300 Surface water in cedar swamp

01466500 Surface water at gaging station (collected by project personnel)

S-6

S-7

S-8

S-9

S-10

McDonalds Branch in Lebanon State Forest 01466500 Surface water at gaging station (collected for USGS Hydrologic Bench-Mark

Network)

Ground-water sites

QUC-1A QWC-1B

QUC-2A QWC-2B

QWC-3A QWC-3B

QWC-4

QWC-5A QWC-5B

QWO-1A QWO-1B

QWO-2A QWO-2B

QWO-3A QUO-3B

QWH-1A QWH-1B

QWH-2A QWH-2B

QWH-3A QWH-3B

QWH-4A QWH-4B

QWH-5A QWH-5B

Lead well

395302074295001 395302074295002

395302074295101 395302074295102

395301074295301 395301074295302

395300074295401

395302074295301 395302074295302

395250074295501 395250074295502

395250074295503 395250074295504

395245074295201 395245074295202

395216074294101 395216074294102

395217074294101 395217074294102

395217074293701 395217074293702

395218074294001 395218074294002

395231074291501 395231074291502

395142074283001

Shallow well in cedar-swamp forest, cedar transect; NJUID 050837* Deep well in cedar-swamp forest, cedar transect; NJUID 050838*

Shallow lowland well in cedar transect; NJUID 050839* Deep lowland well in cedar transect; NJUID 050840*

Shallow upland well in cedar transect; NJUID 050841* Deep upland well in cedar transect; NJUID 050842*

Shallow upland well in cedar transect; NJUID 050843*

Shallow upland well in cedar transect; NJUID 050844* Deep upland well in cedar transect; NJUID 050845*

Shallow well in open channel, open-channel transect; NJUID 050831* Deep well in open channel, open-channel transect; NJUID 050832*

Shallow lowland well in open-channel transect; NJUID 050833* Deep lowland well in open-channel transect; NJUID 050834*

Shallow upland well in open-channel transect; NJUID 050835* Deep upland well in open-channel transect; NJUID 050836"

Shallow well in hardwood- swamp forest, hardwood transect; NJUID 050846* Deep well in hardwood- swamp forest, hardwood transect; NJUID 050847*

Shallow lowland well in hardwood transect; NJUID 050848* Deep lowland well in hardwood transect; NJUID 050849*

Shallow upland well in hardwood transect; NJUID 050850* Deep upland well in hardwood transect; NJUID 050851*

Shallow upland well in hardwood transect; NJUID 050852* Deep upland well in hardwood transect; NJUID 050853*

Shallow well adjacent to clay lens underlying upland swamp; NJUID 051072* Deep well adjacent to clay lens underlying upland swamp; NJUID 051073*

Shallow upland well near gravel pit; NJUID 051074*

* Site locations are shown in figures 7 and 9.WATSTORE site identification number (latitude, longitude, and sequence number) is used for the USGS WATSTORE computer storage and retrieval system.

* NJUID is the New Jersey unique identification well number.

41

Page 48: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

DISCUSSION OF DATA

The clay lenses analyzed in McDonalds Branch basin are composed primarily of fine-grained quartz, kaolinite, and illite (table 1). The fine silt/clay fraction of samples collected from the Lakewood, Lakehurst, Atsion, and Evesboro soils is composed primarily of kaolinite, fine-grained quartz, illite, and aluminum-interlayered vermiculite, with traces of gibbsite (table 4). The Atsion soil also contains trace to moderate amounts of chlorite, and the Atsion and Evesboro soils both contains trace to moderate amounts of aluminum-interlayered montmorillonite. The B and C horizons of these soils are composed of greater than 89 percent sand-sized particles (table 3).

The Lakewood, Lakehurst, Atsion, and Evesboro soils are very strongly to extremely acid (pH < 4.9) and have low cation-exchange capacities, < 0.5 to 10.5 meq/lOOg (milliequivalents per 100 grams), (table 2). Samples of these soils contained up to 1,686 A*g/g (micrograms per gram) extractable aluminum and up to 4,088 A*g/g extractable iron.

From February 1985 through January 1986, McDonalds Branch basin received approximately 37.9 inches of rainfall (data from site number PPT-1WC), and discharge at McDonalds Branch gaging station totaled approximately 6.5 in. Precipitation, throughfall, soil water, surface water, and ground water were sampled and analyzed for a variety of chemical constituents. The chemical characteristics of the different water types varied with both space and time. In general, waters in McDonalds Branch basin were acidic, and sulfate was commonly the dominant anion in basin waters. Waters often contained elevated concentrations of aluminum.

The pH of bulk precipitation (table 17) at site PPT-1BC ranged from 4.1 to 4.7 with a mean of 4.3 (based on District laboratory measurements; mean pH values were calculated by first converting all individual pHs to H+ concentrations; then the mean H+ concentration was calculated and converted to pH). At site PPT-2B, the pH of bulk precipitation ranged from 4.0 to 4.7 with a mean of 4.3. The pH of wet precipitation at site PPT-1WC ranged from 4.0 to 4.8 with a mean of 4.3; at site PPT-2W, the pH of wet precipitation ranged from 4.0 to 4.7 with a mean of 4.3. The pH of throughfall varied with time and canopy type in the basin; overall, pH ranged from 3.6 to 5.4 (based on District laboratory measurements; see table 18).

Soil-water chemistry varied according to location, series, and horizon. Overall, pH measured in the District laboratory ranged from 3.5 to 4.9; DOC ranged from 1.9 to 67 mg/L (milligrams per liter); sulfate ranged from 3.0 to 34 mg/L; aluminum ranged from <10 to 3,600 /ig/L (micrograms per liter); and iron ranged from <3 to 1,500 A*g/L (table 19). The highest concentrations of hydrogen ion, DOC, sulfate, aluminum, and iron were observed in water from the Atsion soil, the most poorly drained soil of the series sampled.

Surface-water chemistry varied with downstream location (tables 20 and 23). The pH tended to increase downstream, whereas DOC, sulfate, aluminum, and iron concentrations generally decreased downstream. The field pH at the farthest upstream site, S-l, ranged from 3.2 to 4.2, with a mean of 3.6, whereas the field pH at the farthest downstream site, the gaging station,

42

Page 49: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

ranged from 3.9 to 4.6, with a mean of 4.3. DOC concentration at upstream site S-l ranged from 5.6 to 37 mg/L, with a mean of 19, whereas DOC concen­ tration at the gaging station ranged from 1.7 to 7.3 mg/L with a mean of 3.1. Sulfate concentration at S-l ranged from 1.1 to 120 mg/L, with a mean of 23 mg/L, whereas sulfate concentration at the gaging station ranged from 2.7 to 13 mg/L, with a mean of 5.6 mg/L. Aluminum and iron concentrations were particularly high at S-l, ranging from 550 to 10,000 and from 360 to 4,700 Mg/L, respectively. At the gaging station, aluminum and iron concentrations were lower, ranging from 20 to 420 Mg/L, and from 43 to 300 Mg/L, respectively.

The chemistry of ground water varied with location in the basin and depth below the water table (tables 21 and 24). pH generally was lower in shallow ground water than in deeper ground water. In shallow ground water, field pH ranged from 3.3 to 5.6, whereas in deeper ground water, field pH ranged from 4.0 to 5.8. DOC concentration usually was low in ground water; higher DOC concentrations were found in shallow ground water near wetlands and lowlands in the hardwood swamp and open channel areas of the basin. In shallow ground water, DOC concentration ranged from 0.2 to 38 mg/L, whereas in deeper ground water, DOC concentration ranged from 0.2 to 4.4 mg/L.

Sulfate concentrations commonly were higher in shallow ground water than in deeper ground water; in shallow ground water, sulfate concentrations ranged from 0.4 to 58 mg/L, whereas in deeper ground water, they ranged from 1.2 to 9.9 mg/L. The highest ground-water sulfate concentrations were found in shallow ground water near wetlands and lowlands in the hardwood swamp and open channel areas of the basin. Aluminum concentrations, like sulfate, commonly were higher in shallow ground water than in deeper ground water, and the highest aluminum concentrations also were found in shallow ground water near wetlands and lowlands in the hardwood swamp and open channel areas of the basin. In shallow ground water, aluminum concentrations ranged from < 10 to 6,100 Mg/L; in deeper ground water, they ranged from < 10 to 1,200 Mg/L. Iron concentrations in shallow ground water ranged from < 2 to 11,000 Mg/L, and in deeper ground water, they ranged from < 2 to 2,700 Mg/L. Iron concentrations were less than 120 Mg/L except in ground water associated with the wetlands and lowlands near the hardwood swamp and open channel areas in the basin.

43

Page 50: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

REFERENCES CITED

Barce, M. J., Gibb, J. P., and Miller, R. A., 1983, A guide to the selection of materials for monitoring well construction and ground-water sampling: Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, Illinois, ISWS Contract Report 327, 78 p.

Barcelona, M. J., Gibb, J. P., Helfrich, J. A., andGarske, E. E., 1985, Practical guide for ground-water sampling: Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, Illinois, ISWS Contract Report 374, 94 p.

Bauersfeld, W. R., Moshinsky, E. W., Pustay, E. A., and Jones, W. D., 1987, Water resources data, New Jersey, Water Year 1986, Volume 2. Delaware River Basin and tributaries to Delaware Bay: U. S. Geological Survey Water-Data Report NJ-86-2, 197 p.

Black, C. A., Evans, D. D., White, J. L., Ensminger, L. E., Clark, F. E.,and Dinauer, R. C., eds., 1965, Methods of soil analysis: Agronomy No. 9, Madison, Wisconsin, American Society of Agronomy, Inc., 1572 p.

Briggs, L. J., and McCall, A. G., 1904, An artificial root for inducing capillary movement of soil moisture: Science, v. 20, p. 566-569.

Clesceri, N. L., and Vasudevan, C., 1980, Acid precipitation, throughfallchemistry, and canopy processes, in Drablos, D., and Tollan, A., eds., Ecological impact of acid precipitation, Oslo, Norway, SNSF Project, p. 258-259.

Cole, D. W., 1958, Alundum tension lysimeter: Soil Science, v. 85, p. 293- 296.

Douglas, L. A., and Trela, J. J., 1979, Mineralogy of Pine Barrens soils, in Forman, R. T. T., ed., Pine Barrens: Ecosystem and Landscape: New York, Academic Press, p. 95-109.

Eaton, J. S., Likens, G. E., and Bormann, F. H., 1973, Throughfall andstemflow chemistry in a northern hardwood forest: Journal of Ecology, v. 61, p. 495-508.

Fishman, M. J., and Friedman, L. C., eds., 1985, Methods for determination of inorganic substances in water and fluvial sediments: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 5, Chap. Al, Open-File Report 85-495, 709 p.

Friedman, L. C., and Erdmann, D. G., 1982, Quality assurance practices for the chemical and biological analyses of water and fluvial sediments: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 5, chap. A6, 181 p.

Gillespie, B. D., and Schopp, R. D., 1982, Low-flow characteristics and flow duration of New Jersey streams: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 81-1110, 164 p.

44

Page 51: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

REFERENCES CITED--Continued

Goerlitz, D. F., and Brown, E., 1972, Methods for analysis of organic substances in water: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water- Resources Investigations, Book 5, chap. A3, 40 p.

Good, R. E., Good, N. F., and Andresen, J. W., 1979, The Pine Barren Plains, in Forman, R. T. T., ed., Pine Barrens: Ecosystem and Landscape: New York, Academic Press, p. 283-295.

Gran, G., 1952, Determination of the equivalence point in potentiometric titrations. Part II: The Analyst, v. 77, p. 661-671.

Hansen, E. A., and Harris, A. R., 1975, Validity of soilwater samplescollected with porous ceramic cups: Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, v. 39, p. 528-536.

Heanes, D. L., 1984, Determination of total organic-C in soils by animproved chromic acid digestion and spectrophotometric procedure: Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, v. 15, no. 10, p. 1191-1213.

Helvey, J. D., and Patric, J. H., 1965a, Canopy and litter interception of rainfall by hardwoods of eastern United States: Water Resources Research, v. 1, p. 193-206.

____ 1965b, Design criteria for interception studies: Publication no. 67 of the International Association of Scientific Hydrology Symposium Design of Hydrological Networks, p. 131-137.

Hem, J. D., 1985, Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics of natural water, third edition: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2254, 263 p.

Johnson, A. H., 1979a, Evidence of acidification of headwater streams in the New Jersey Pinelands: Science, v. 206, p. 834-836.

Johnson, A. H., 1979b, Acidification of headwater streams in the New Jersey Pine Barrens: Journal of Environmental Quality, v. 8, no. 3, p. 383- 386.

Johnsson, P. A., and Lord, D. G., 1987, A computer program for geochemical analysis of acid-rain and other low-ionic strength samples, acidic waters: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 87-4095A, 42 p.

Jordan, C. F., 1966, Quantity and composition of water in natural soilsystems: A lysimeter study: New Brunswick, New Jersey, Rutgers, the State University, unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, 70 p.

Kohnke, H., Dreibelbis, F. R., and Davidson, J. M., 1940, A survey anddiscussion of lysimeters and a bibliography on their construction and performance: U.S. Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous Publication 372, 63 p.

45

Page 52: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

REFERENCES CITED--Continued

Leibfried, R. T. , 1982, Chemical interactions between forest soils andacidic precipitation during a dormant season on Wildcat Run watershed in southwestern Pennsylvania: Master's thesis, Pennsylvania State University, Springfield, Va., National Technical Information Service, 86 p.

Little, S., 1979, Fire and plant succession in the New Jersey Pine Barrens, in Forman, R. T. T., ed., Pine Barrens: Ecosystem and Landscape: New York, Academic Press, p. 297-314.

Madsen, E. L., Morgan, M. D., and Godd, R. E., 1986, Simultaneousphotoreduction and microbial oxidation of iron in a stream in the New Jersey Pinelands: Limnology and Oceanography, v. 31, no. 4, p. 832- 838.

Markley, M. L., 1955, National cooperative soil studies, watershed research project areas, Middle Branch and McDonalds Branch, Lebanon State Forest, New Jersey: New Brunswick, New Jersey Soil Conservation Service, 8 p.

____ 1971, Soil survey of Burlington County, New Jersey: Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Agriculture, Cartographic Division, Soil Conservation Service, 103 p.

____ 1979, Soil series of the Pine Barrens, in Forman, R. T. T., ed., Pine Barrens: Ecosystem and Landscape: New York, Academic Press, p. 81-93.

Markewicz, F. J., 1969, Ilmenite deposits of the New Jersey Coastal Plain, in Subitsky, S., ed., Geology of Selected Areas in New Jersey and Eastern Pennsylvania and Guidebook of Excursions: New Brunswick, N.J., Rutgers University Press, p. 363-382.

McCormick, J., 1955, A vegetation inventory of two watersheds in the New Jersey Pine Barrens: New Brunswick, N.J., Rutgers University, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, 125 p.

____ 1979, The vegetation of the New Jersey Pine Barrens, in Forman, R. T.T., ed., Pine Barrens: Ecosystem and Landscape: New York, Academic Press, p. 229-243.

Means, J. L., Yuretich, R. F., Crerar, D. A., Kinsman, D. J. J., andBorcsik, M. P., 1981, Hydrogeochemistry of the New Jersey Pine Barrens Department of Environmental Protection, New Jersey Geological Survey Bulletin 76, 107 p.

Minard, J. P., 1966, Sandblasted blocks on a hill in the Coastal Plain of New Jersey: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 550-B, p. B87- B90.

46

Page 53: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

REFERENCES CITED--Continued

Minard, J. P., and Owens, J. P., 1960, Differential subsidence of thesouthern part of the New Jersey Coastal Plain since Early Cretaceous times: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 400B, p. B184-B186.

Morrison, R. D., 1983, Ground Water Monitoring Technology, Procedures, Equipment, and Applications: Prairie du Sac, Wis., Timco Mfg., Inc., 111 p.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1982, Monthly normals oftemperature, precipitation, and heating and cooling degree days, 1951- 1980, New Jersey, in Climatography of the United States No. 81: Asheville, N.C., National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climate Center, 9 p.

New Jersey Pinelands Commission, 1980, New Jersey Pinelands Comprehensive Management Plan: State of New Jersey, Pinelands Commission, 446 p.

Oliver, B. G., Thurman, E. M., and Malcolm, R. L., 1983, The contribution of humic substances to the acidity of colored natural waters: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 47, p. 2031-2035.

Olsson, Hans, 1979, Vegetation of the New Jersey Pine Barrens: Aphytosociological classification, in Forman, R. T. T., ed., Pine Barrens: Ecosystem and Landscape: New York, Academic Press, p. 245- 264.

Olsvig, L. S., Cryan, J. F., and Whittaker, R. H., 1979, Vegetationalgradients of the pine plains and barrens of Long Island, New York, in Forman, R. T. T., ed., Pine Barrens: Ecosystem and Landscape: New York, Academic Press, p. 265-282.

Owens, J. P., and Minard, J. P., 1975, Geologic map of the surficial deposits in the Trenton area, New Jersey and Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Geologic Investigations Map 1-884.

Owens, J. P., and Sohl, N. F., 1969, Shelf and deltaic paleoenvironments in the Cretaceous-Tertiary formations of the New Jersey Coastal Plain, in Subitsky, S., ed., Geology of selected areas in New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania and Guidebook of excursions: New Brunswick, N.J., Rutgers University Press, p. 235-278.

Peters, D. G., Hayes, J. M., andHieftje, G. M., 1974, Chemical separation and measurement, in Theory and practice of analytical chemistry: Philadelphia, Pa., W. B. Sanders and Co., 379 p.

Reigner, I. C., 1964, Evaluation of the trough type rain gage: U.S. Forest Service Northeastern Forest Experimental Station Research Note 20, 4 p.

Reynolds, E. R. C., and Leyton, L., 1963, Measurement and significance of throughfall in forest stands, in Rutter, A. J., and Whitehead, F. H., eds., The water relations of plants: New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., p. 127-141.

47

Page 54: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

REFERENCES CITED--Continued

Rhodehamel, E. C., 1970, A hydrologic analysis of the New Jersey PineBarrens region: New Jersey Division of Water Policy Water Resources Circular No. 22, 35 p.

____ 1979a, Geology of the Pine Barrens of New Jersey, in Forman, R. T. T., ed., Pine Barrens: Ecosystem and Landscape: New York, Academic Press, p.39-60.

____ 1979b, Hydrology of the New Jersey Pine Barrens, in Forman, R. T. T., ed., Pine Barrens: Ecosystem and Landscape: New York, Academic Press, p. 147-168.

Salisbury, R. D., and Knapp, G. N., 1917, The Quaternary formations ofsouthern New Jersey: Final Report, ser. v. 8, New Jersey Geological Survey, Trenton, N.J., 209 p.

Skougstad, M. W., Fishman, M. J., Friedman, L. C., Erdmann, D. E., and Duncan, S. S., eds., 1979, Methods for determination of inorganic substances in water and fluvial sediments: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 5, chap. Al, 626 p.

Swanson, K. A., 1979, Trace metal budgets for a forested watershed in the New Jersey Pine Barrens: Philadelphia, Pa., University of Pennsylvania, Masters thesis, 96 p.

Tamura, T., 1958, Identification of clay minerals from acid soils: Journal of Soil Science, v. 9, no. 1, p. 141-147.

Turner, R. S., 1983, Biogeochemistry of trace elements in the McDonaldsBranch watershed, New Jersey Pine Barrens: Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Ann Arbor, Mich., University Microfilms International, 321 p.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1975, Soil Taxonomy: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Handbook No. 436, 754 p.

____ 1984, Procedures for collecting soil samples and methods of analysisfor soil survey: Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 1, 68 p.

Wagner, G. H., 1962, Use of porous ceramic cups to sample soil water within the profile: Soil Science, v. 94, p. 379-386.

Warshaw, C. M., and Roy, Rustum, 1961, Classification and a scheme for the identification of layer silicates: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 72, p. 1455-1492.

Whittaker, R. H., 1979, Vegetational relationships of the Pine Barrens, in Forman, R. T. T., ed., Pine Barrens: Ecosystem and Landscape: New York, Academic Press, p. 315-332.

48

Page 55: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

REFERENCES CITED--Continued

Wilson, W. T., 1950, Discussion of "comparative rain measurements and raingage performances on a steep slope adjacent to a pine stand": Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, v. 31, p. 131-133.

Wood, W. W., 1976, Guidelines for collection and field analysis of ground- water samples for selected unstable constituents: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 1, chap. D2, 24 p.

Zimmermann, C. F., Price, M. T., and Montgomery, J. R., 1978, A comparison of ceramic and teflon in situ samplers for nutrient pore water determinations: Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, v. 7, p. 93-97.

49

Page 56: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

GLOSSARY

Acid: A hydrogen-containing substance which dissociates upon solution in water to produce one or more hydrogen ions.

Acidic deposition: The transfer of acidic compounds from the atmosphere to the earth's surface. These compounds may be wet or dry. Wet deposition consists of dissolved sulfuric and nitric acids in rain, cloud droplets, and snow. Dry deposition consists of acidic compounds in gaseous or particle form.

Aeolian: Means pertaining to the wind.

Aerie: A modifying descriptive term in soil classification which connotes aeration of the soil.

Alkalinity: The acid-neutralizing capacity of a particular representative water sample.

Alluvial: Refers to unconsolidated terrestrial sediment that has been deposited by water.

Anion: An ion with a negative charge.

Aquifer: A geologic formation, group of formations, or part of a formation that contains sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. An aquifer containing water under sufficient pressure to rise above the top of the aquifer when penetrated by a well is called a confined aquifer.

Canopy: The uppermost spreading branched layer of a forest.

Cation: An ion with a positive charge.

Cation-exchange capacity: The sum total of exchangeable cations that a soil can adsorb. It is expressed in milliequivalents per 100 grams of soil.

Clay: Sedimentary or soil material consisting of particles <0.002 mm in equivalent diameter.

Clay mineral: A naturally occurring inorganic material, usually crystalline. Clay minerals are layer silicates.

Deltaic: Means pertaining to river deltas.

Dissolved: Refers to that material in a representative water sample whichpasses through a 0.45-micrometer membrane filter. This is a convenient operational definition used by federal agencies that collect water data. Determination- of "dissolved" constituents are made on subsamples of the filtrate.

50

Page 57: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Drainage basin: A part of the surface of the earth that is occupied by a drainage system, which consists of a surface stream or body of impounded surface water together with all tributary surface streams and bodies of impounded surface water.

Evapotranspiration: The passage of water vapor into the atmosphere by the combined processes of evaporation and plant transpiration.

Fluvial: Refers to processes associated with streams and rivers.

Ground water: Water saturating a geologic stratum (layer) beneath the land surface.

Haplaquods: Represent a Great Group within the Spodosol Order of soils.Haplaquods have spodic horizons in which >50 percent of the horizon has a free Fe/C ratio <0.2.

Hydrophytes: Vascular plants that grow wholly or partly in water.

Ion: An atom or group of atoms that has gained or lost electrons and so has a net electric charge.

Leaching: Refers to the removal of materials in solution from the soil.

Limonitic: Containing limonite, a hydrous iron oxide.

Lithologv: The systematic description of rocks in terms of mineral composition and texture.

Medisaprist: A Great Group soil classification applied to soils with a subsurface layer dominated by highly decomposed organic matter, in which the accumulation of illuviated humus is not thicker than 2 centimeters.

Micrograms per liter (jUg/L): A unit expressing the concentration ofchemical constituents in solution as mass (microgram 1 x 10 6 gram) of solute per unit volume (liter) of water. One /ig/L is approximately equal to 1 part per billion (ppb) in aqueous solutions of low dissolved-solids concentration.

Microsiemens per centimeter (/zS/cm): Units used to express electrical conductivity.

Milliequivalents per liter (meq/L): A unit expressing the concentration of chemical constituents in solution as 10 3 hydrogen equivalents.

Milligrams per liter (mg/L): A unit for expressing the concentration ofchemical constituents in solution as the mass (1 milligram - 1 x 10 3 gram) of solute per unit volume (liter) of water. One mg/L is approximately equal to 1 part per million (ppm) in aqueous solutions of low dissolved-solids concentration.

51

Page 58: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Minimum detection limit: For a given type of sample and analytical procedure, that concentration below which the presence of the constituent being analyzed cannot be verified. In this report the minimum detection limits can be identified in the tables of chemical constituents where a less than (<) symbol precedes a value.

Nutrients: As used in this report, refers to one or more of the following water-quality constituents: ammonia, organic nitrogen plus ammonia, nitrite, nitrate-plus-nitrite, phosphorus, and orthophosphate.

Organic anion: A term applied to the group of carboxylate anions ofnaturally occurring organic acids (humic and fulvic). The organic anion is assumed to be monovalent.

pH: The negative logarithm of the hydrogen ion activity. A solution with a pH of 7.0 at 25 degrees Celsius is considered to be neutral. An acidic solution has a pH of less than 7.0, and an alkaline solution a pH of greater than 7.0.

Quartzipsamment: Soils without natural genetic horizons or with only the beginning of such horizons, that have textures of loamy fine sand or coarser, in which more than 95 percent of the sand fraction (by weight) is quartz, zircon, tourmaline, rutile, and other resistant minerals.

Sediment: A solid material that originates mostly from disintegrated rocks and is transformed by, suspended in, or deposited from water; it includes chemical and biochemical precipitates and decomposed organic material such as humus. Sediment may also be suspended in and deposited from moving air masses.

Soil horizon: A layer of soil, approximately parallel to the soil surface, with distinct characteristics produced by soil-forming processes.

0 horizons or layers are layers dominated by inorganic material, exceptlimnic layers that are organic. Some are saturated with water for long periods or were once saturated but now are artificially drained; others have never been saturated.

A horizon is a mineral horizon that formed at the surface or below an 0horizon and (1) is characterized by an accumulation of humified organic matter intimately mixed with the mineral fraction and not dominated by properties characteristic of E or B horizons (defined below), or (2) has properties resulting from cultivation, pasturing, or similar kinds of disturbance.

E horizon is a mineral horizon in which the main feature is loss ofsilicate clay, iron, aluminum, or some combination of these, leaving a concentration of sand and silt particles of quartz or other resistant minerals.

52

Page 59: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

B horizon is a horizon that formed below an A, E, or 0 horizon and isdominated by obliteration of all or much of the original rock structure and by (1) illuvial concentration of silicate clay, iron, aluminum, humus, carbonates, gypsum, or silica, alone or in combination; (2) evidence of removal of carbonates; (3) residual concentration of sesquioxides; (4) coatings of sesquioxides that make the horizon conspicuously lower in value, higher in chroma, or redder in hue than overlying or underlying horizons without apparent illuviation of iron; (5) alteration that forms silicate clay or liberates oxides or both and that forms granular, blocky, or prismatic structure if volume changes accompany changes in moisture content; or (6) any combination of these.

C horizon or layer is a horizon or layer, excluding hard bedrock, that is little affected by pedogenic processes and lacks properties of 0, A, E, or B horizons. Most are mineral layers, but limnic layers, whether organic or inorganic, are included. The material of C layers may be either like or unlike that from which the solum presumably formed. C horizons may have been modified even if there was no evidence of pedogenesis.

Soil series: The basic unit of soil classification, being a subdivision of a family and consisting of soils that are essentially alike in all major profile characteristics.

Specific conductance: A measure of the ability of water to conduct anelectrical current. Conductance is expressed in units of microSiemens per centimeter at 25 C.

Spodic horizon: A subsurface diagnostic horizon that contains an illuvial accumulation of free sesquioxides of iron and aluminum and of organic matter.

Terric: A modifying descriptive term in soil classification which connotes a mineral substratum.

Typic: A modifying descriptive term in soil classification which is applied to soils that represent the central concept or characteristics of their great group.

Throughfall: That portion of the gross precipitation that directly reaches the litter through spaces in the vegetative canopy and as drip from leaves, twigs, and stems.

Trace metals: Elements that would be chemically classified as metals (for example, iron) and that typically are present in solution at concentrations of micrograms per liter.

Water table: That surface in an unconfined water body at which the pressure is atmospheric.

Well screen: The slotted or pierced part of a well casing through which water enters the well.

53

Page 60: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

X-rav diffraction: A technique by which mineral structures are identified by exposing crystalline material to X-rays and studying the resulting diffraction pattern.

54

Page 61: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

QZo oLU CODC LU 0.H LU LU Li.OOQD OZ~ 1-5UJoDC

O COoZ<UJ

3.0

2.5

2.0

1.0

0.5

i i i r i i T

i i i i i i i i i i iOCT. NOV. DEC. JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT. OCT. NOV. DEC. JAN. FEB. MAR.

1984 1985 1986

Figure 13.--Daily discharge at McDonalds Branch gaging station (01466500), October 1984 through March 1986.

55

Page 62: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

HIo&DCD COQ

3HI 00

HI HI

HI> HI_lDCHI

I

6

8

i i

iii

127

126

125

124

OCT. NOV. DEC. JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT .OCT.NOV. DEC. JAN. FEB. MAR.

1984 1985 1986

EXPLANATION

\J\ Recorded mean daily water level

Manual water-level measurements

HI> HI

HI COHI

§00

Hl HI

HI> HI

DCHI

I

Figure 14.--Hydrograph for well QWO-3B, October 1984 through March 1986

56

Page 63: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

tn

H« B 5 a 1-5 o CM l-h

O td O

O rt vo

oo rt

D4

<& 1-5 S- vo

00

WATER LEVEL.

IN FEET BELOW LAND SURFACE

.pk

N>

O

00

* tf 3 C ft) water-level

3 (D W C CD 3 (D j' 0)

^^ (D O O Q.

EXPLANATIO

ed

mean dail

<

z^ SJ. CD CD

"

^^

g i i b m o Tl m CD 2 ? ^ X j» AY

JUNE JULY

AUG

.:1985

Q TJ b H 1 b m 0 ^ z

00

mO

) Z 5

1 1

~

_

1

_ _

-

<^

*

\

1 1

fo

fo

wO

> 00

O

WATER LEVEL,

IN FEET ABOVE SEA LEVEL

Page 64: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

LU 0 13LLCCDCOQ

< 14_J

1LU

" 15LULULL

Z.

Lu 16

LU

CCLU£? 17

i IB

-

i i

i i i i I I l i l l l

" V" .

N. ^

~ i e\

i i i i i i i i i i i

i i

,

-

i i

126 _,LU>LU_J

^LU

125 COLUsCD

124 LULU LL

Z

LU123 S_JCCLU

<1P9 >

OCT. NOV. DEC. JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT. OCT. NOV. DEC. JAN. FEB. MAR.

1984 1985 1986

EXPLANATION

v~v\ Recorded mean daily water level

Manual water-level measurements

Figure 16.--Hydrograph for well QWC-3A, October 1984 through March 1986

58

Page 65: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

LLJ 0 135ccD

Q

< 14_J

s3LLJ

m 15HiLLJ U-

Z

u{ 16>accLLJ£? 17

I ~l

-

-

-

i i

I i I I I l I I I i i

A.^-"^

* «r>

Xv

I I I I I I I I I I I

I I-

_*

X,

-

I I

_,126 LLJ

S<

V)125 LLJ§

m

LLJ124 [Jj

Z

_J LLJ

. _ _ in123 Jj

CCLLJ^fZ

OCT. NOV. DEC. JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT.OCT.NOV. DEC. JAN. FEB. MAR.

1984 1985 1986

EXPLANATION

Recorded mean daily water level

Manual water-level measurements

Figure 17.--Hydrograph for well QWC-3B, October 1984 through March 1986

59

Page 66: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

UJ

CC

COQZ

UJ CO

UJ UJ LL

UJ

UJ

QCUJ

=137

- 132

- 127

122

UJ>UJ

UJ COUJ§CO< I-UJ UJ

UJ

UJ

orUJ

IOCT. NOV. DEC. JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT. OCT. NOV. DEC. JAN. FEB. MAR.

1984 1985 1986

EXPLANATION

--^S' Recorded mean daily water level

Figure 18.--Hydrograph for USGS long-term observation well LSF-23D, October 1984 through March 1986.

60

Page 67: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 11.--Rainfall (inches) to McDonalds Branch basin. January 24. 1985 through March 25. 1986--

SITE

DAY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

PPT-1WC

JAN FEB

--- 0.75

.40

.00

.05

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.90

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

0.00 .00

.00 .00

.00 .00

.00 .00

.00 .00

.00

.00

.10

event -recording

MAR

0.05

.10

.00

.05

.15

.00

.00

.15

.00

.00

.00

.50

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.05

.00

.00

.25

.25

.00

.00

.00

.05

.00

.00

.20

APR

0.30

.00

.05

.05

.00

.10

.05

.00

.00

.00

.05

.00

.00

.00

.15

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.05

.00

.00

.05

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

ram gages

[in., inches;

MAY

0.00

.25

1.60

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.20

.05

.00

.00

1.45

.00

.35

.00

.00

.00

.00

.30

.15

.00

.00

JUNE

0.50

.00

.15

.00

.85

.00

.00

.45

.00

.00

.00

.25

.00

.05

.00

1.20

.00

.05

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.154...

4...

4...

4...

4 0.204...

-- indicates missing

JULY

0.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.05

.05

.00

.05

.00

.00

.00

.00

.40

1.403...

3...

.00

.00

.00

.40

.00

.00

.00

.85

.35

.00

.00

.00

.30

AUG

0.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00l...

1 1.20

1...

1...

1...

1...

.00

.05

.00

.00

.00

.10

.10

.00

.45

.00

.00

.00

.45

.00

.00

.00

.00

.60

.00

SEPT

0.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.10

.85

.05

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.25

.20

.00

.80

2.85

.00

.00

.00

data]

OCT

0.00

.05

1.10

.40

.15

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

NOV

0.00

.00

.00

.45

.70

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.05

.00

1.35

.05

.00

.00

.00

.00

1.15

.00

.00

.15

.20

.20

1.25

.00

.55

DEC

0.15

.00

.00

.00

.05

.25

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.50

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.10

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.15

JAN

0.00

.00

.55

.00

.10

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.30

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.70

2.05

.25

.00

.10

.00

.00

FEB

0.00

.05

.00

.70

.10

.00

.60

.00

.00

.00

.35

.00

.00

.10

.00

.00

.05

.75

.00

.10

.30

.10

.10

.00

.00

.00

.05

.00

MAR

0.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.10

.00

1.20

.40

2 .202...

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

...

...

...

...

......

TOTAL --- 2.10 1.80 0.85 4.35 3.85 33.85 2.95 5.10 1.70 6.10 1.20 4.05 3.35

61

Page 68: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 11.- Rainfall (inches) to McDonaldsevent- recording

SITE PPT-2W

DAY JAN

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24 .00

25 .00

26 .00

27 .00

28 .00

29 .00

30 .00

31 .15

TOTAL

FEB

0.70

.40

.00

.05

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.90

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

2.05

MAR

5...

5 0.25

.00

.05

.25

.00

.00

.15

.00

.00

.05

.50

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.05

.00

.05

.25

.25

.00

.00

.00

.05

.00

.05

.20

2.15

APR

0.25

.00

.10

.05

.00

.10

.05

.05

.00

.00

.05

.00

.00

.00

.15

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.05

.00

.00

.05

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

0.90

rain gages- -Co

MAY

0.00

.25

1.35

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.20

.05

.00

.00

.70

.00

.35

.00

.00

.00

.00

.30

.15

.00

.00

3.35

JUNE

0.25

.00

.05

.00

.65

.00

.00

.45

.00

.00

.00

.15

.00

.00

.05

1.00

.00

.05

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.10

.00

.00

.00

.10

.10

.00

2.95

R Branchtfnued

JULY

0.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.05

.05

.00

.05

.00

.00

.00

.00

.25

1.85

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.35

.00

.00

.00

.75

.15

.00

.00

.15

.25

3.90

basin.

AUG

0.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.20

1.30

.00

.00

.05

.00

.00

.15

.00

.00

.00

.10

.15

.00

.30

.00

.00

.00

.45

.00

.00

.00

.00

.55

.00

3.25

January

SEPT

0.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.05

.70

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.25

.25

.00

.65

2.80

.00

.00

.00

4.70

24. 1985 through March 25.

OCT

0.00

.05

1.00

.45

.10

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

1.60

NOV

0.00

.00

.00

.55

.50

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

1.30

.05

.00

.00

.00

.00

1.15

.00

.00

.05

.25

.15

1.40

.00

.60

6.00

DEC JAN

0.15 0.00

.00 .00

.00 .50

.00 .00

.00 .15

7 .30 .00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.30

.05

.00

.00

.00

.00 .00

.00 .60

.00 2.30

.00 .25

.00 .05

.00 .05

.00 .00

.15 .00

--- 4.25

1986-

FEB

0.00

.05

.00

6 .806...

.00

.60

.00

.00

.00

.40

.00

.00

.10

.00

.00

.05

.65

.05

.10

.25

.10

.05

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

3.20

MAR

0.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.05

.00

1.20

.35

.10

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00

.00..................

...

1 Missing record from 8/7/85 to 8/11/85. Event recorder indicated that rain fell on 8/7/85, 8/8/85, and 8/11/85. Record on 8/12/85 indicated that over the period 8/7/85 to 8/12/85, approximately 1.20 in. of rain fell; most of this rain probably fell on 8/7/85 and 8/8/85.

* Missing record from 8:00 p.m. on 3/15/86 to 3/17/86. Event recorder indicated that rain fell between 8:00 p.m.on 3/15/86 and 8/16/86, and no rain fell on 3/17/86. Record on 3/18/86 indicated that approximately 0.20 in.of rain fell over the period, probably on 3/15/86 and 3/16/86.

9 Although record was missing at this site on 7/17/85 and 7/18/85, no rainfall (0.00 in.) was recorded at PPT-2Won 7/17/85 and 7/18/85. For the purposes of calculating total rainfall for February 1985 to January 1986,

. rainfall at PPT-1W was estimated as 0.00 in. on 7/17/85 and 7/18/85.* Missing record from 6/25/85 to 7/1/85. Event recorder indicated that rain fell on 6/28/85 to 6/29/85. Record on 7/1/85 and 7/2/85 indicated that approximately 0.20 in. of rain fell over the period 6/25/85 to 7/1/85; this rain probably fell on 6/28/85 and 6/29/85.

6 Missing record on 3/1/85 and 3/2/85. Event recorder and record on 3/3/85 indicated that approximately 0.25 in. of rain fell during these two days between about 11:00 p.m., 3/1/85, and 3:00 a.m., 3/2/85.

6 Missing record on 2/4/86 and 2/5/86. Event recorder and record at 2:00 p.m. on 2/5/86 indicated that approximately 0.80 in. of rain fell on those two days, most of which probably fell on 2/4/86.

' Collector was removed at 12:00 noon on 12/6/85 to prevent vandalism during hunting season and was reinstalled on 12/24/85. Before removal on 12/6/85, 0.30 in. of rain fell. It is possible that some additional rain fell later in the day; however, total rainfall at site number PPT-2U on 12/6/85 was 0.25 in.

62

Page 69: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 12.--Rainfall (inches) to McDonalds Branch basin. February 7. 1985through March 25.

i<

Dates

02/07/1985-02/14/1985

02/14/1985-02/20/1985

02/20/1985-02/26/1985

02/26/1985-03/05/1985

03/05/1985-03/12/1985

03/12/1985-03/19/1985

03/19/1985-03/26/1985

03/26/1985-04/02/1985

04/02/1985-04/09/1985

04/09/1985-04/16/1985

04/16/1985-04/23/1985

04/23/1985-04/30/1985

04/30/1985-05/07/1985

05/07/1985-05/14/1985

05/14/1985-05/21/1985

05/21/1985-05/28/1985

05/28/1985-06/04/1985

06/04/1985-06/11/1985

06/11/1985-06/18/1985

06/18/1985-06/25/1985

06/25/1985-07/02/1985

07/02/1985-07/09/1985

1986 --wedge rain gages

indicates less than]

Site

PPT-1BC (inches)

'0.9

.00

.00

.35

.60

.00

.55

.53

.14

.18

.02

.03

1.62

.00

.18

1.45

.80

1.15

1.35

.15

.19

.07

name

PPT-2B (inches)

^.78

.01

.00

.48

.64

.00

.57

.53

.16

.22

.03

.03

1.45

.00

.24

.84

.58

1.05

1.18

.07

.21

.07

63

Page 70: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 12.--Rainfall (inches) to McDonalds Branch basin. February 7. 1985through March 25.

Dates

07/09/1985-07/16/1985

07/16/1985-07/23/1985

07/23/1985-07/30/1985

07/30/1985-08/06/1985

08/06/1985-08/13/1985

08/13/1985-08/20/1985

08/20/1985-08/27/1985

08/27/1985-09/03/1985

09/03/1985-09/10/1985

09/10/1985-09/17/1985

09/17/1985-09/24/1985

09/24/1985-10/01/1985

10/01/1985-10/08/1985

10/08/1985-10/15/1985

10/15/1985-10/22/1985

10/22/1985-10/29/1985

10/29/1985-11/05/1985

11/05/1985-11/12/1985

11/12/1985-11/19/1985

11/19/1985-11/26/1985

11/26/1985-12/03/1985

12/03/1985-12/10/1985

1986 --wedge rain gages --

Site

PPT-1BC (inches)

1.15

.68

1.00

.19

1.08

.21

.80

.52

.90

.00

.42

3.20

1.60

.00

.00

.00

1.15

.04

1.35

1.30

2.25

.42

Continued.

name

PPT-2B (inches)

1.20

.96

.83

.30

1.32

.40

.76

.50

.78

.00

.52

3.00

1.55

.00

.00

.05

1.05

.04

1.35

1.32

2 2.55

3...

64

Page 71: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 12.--Rainfall (inches) to McDonalds Branch basin. February 7. 1985through March 25. 1986- -wedge rain sages-- Continued.

Dates

12/10/1985-12/17/1985

12/17/1985-12/24/1985

12/24/1985-12/31/1985

12/31/1985-01/07/1986

01/07/1986-01/14/1986

01/14/1986-01/21/1986

01/21/1986-01/28/1986

01/28/1986-02/05/1986

02/05/1986-02/12/1986

02/12/1986-02/19/1986

02/19/1986-02/25/1986

02/25/1986-03/04/1986

03/04/1986-03/11/1986

03/11/1986-03/18/1986

03/18/1986-03/25/1986

Site

PPT-1BC (inches)

0.50

.13

.00

.80

.00

.34

2 3.45

.86

2 .72

.96

.60

.02

.09

1.70

.00

name

PPT-2B (inches)

3_ __

3_ __

0.00

1.00

.00

.41

2 3.65

.86

2 1.05

.86

.60

.04

.06

1.60

< .01

1 Precipitation partially frozen (ice and water).

2 Precipitation frozen.

3 Missing data--collector was removed 12/6/85 because of hunting season and reinstalled 12/24/85.

65

Page 72: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 13.--Throuehfall (inches) to the McDonalds Branch basin.December 24. 1985

[<

Dates

12/24/1985-12/31/1985

12/31/1985-01/07/1986

01/07/1986-01/14/1986

01/14/1986-01/21/1986

01/21/1986-01/28/1986

01/28/1986-02/05/1986

02/05/1986-02/12/1986

02/12/1986-02/19/1986

02/19/1986-02/25/1986

02/25/1986-03/04/1986

03/04/1986-03/11/1986

03/11/1986-03/18/1986

03/18/1986-03/25/1986

through March 25. 1986

C indicates

TF-1C (inches)

0.00

1 .50

.00

.26

2.50

.52

1 .40

.56

.38

.02

.02

1.25

< .01

less than]

Site

TF-2PB (inches)

0.00

.74

.00

.28

13.35

.49

1 .65

3_ _ _

.44

.04

.05

1.30

.01

- -wedge rain

name

TF-3H (inches)

0.00

2_ . .

.00

.27

2.65

.66

1 .74

.64

.48

.05

.05

1.35

.01

gages

TF-4PBJ (inches)

0.00

.55

.00

.36

12.15

.70

1 .63

.55

.46

.04

.03

1.60

< .01

1 Throughfall frozen.

2 Value deleted because gage contained liquid other than precipitation.

3 Missing data.

66

Page 73: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 14.--Stage measurements from upstream sites in McDonalds Branch basin

Site name

SG-H2SG-HSG-HSG-HSG-HSG-HSG-HSG-HSG-HSG-HSG-HSG-HSG-HSG-HSG-HSG-HSG-HSG-H

SG-OC 4SG-OCSG-OCSG-OCSG-OCSG-OCSG-OCSG-OCSG-OCSG-OCSG-OCSG-OCSG-OCSG-OCSG-OCSG-OCSG-OCSG-OCSG-OCSG-OC

SG-CQ6SG-CQSG-CQSG-CQSG-CQSG-CQ

Date of

measurement

08/24/198408/29/198401/25/198502/27/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

08/13/198408/29/198410/26/198401/25/198502/26/198502/28/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

08/14/198410/25/198401/24/198502/28/198504/01/198505/09/1985

Water altitude 1 (feet)

132.17131.97132.23132.32132.32132.17131.82

_ _ _3

_- _3

_ _ _3

131.70- _ _3

132.06132.16132.08132.32132.24131.92

127.02126.76126.44

- -_5

126.31126.27126.02

_ _ _3

- _-3

_ _ _3

- _ _3

._ _3

_ _ _3

- _ _3

- _ _3

-__5

_ _ .3

126.33126.25125.95

125.52125.34124.97

_. .7

124.95_ _ .3

67

Page 74: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 14.--Stage measurements from upstream sites in McDonalds Branch basin- Continued

Date WaterSite of altitude 1name measurement (feet)

SG-CQ 06/04/1985 --- 3SG-CQ 07/30/1985 --- 3SG-CQ 08/29/1985 ---«SG-CQ 09/30/1985 --- 3SG-CQ 11/26/1985 --- 3SG-CQ 12/20/1985 --- 3SG-CQ 01/23/1986 --- 3SG-CQ 02/26/1986 125.08SG-CQ 03/21/1986 124.92SG-CQ 05/21/1986 --- 3

1 Referenced to sea level.

2 SG-H is the staff gage located in the hardwood swamp near wells H-5A, 5B (fig. 8). The zero altitude of this gage after installation (August 10,1984) was 130.389 feet. After the winter, the gage was releveled (May 7,1985), and zero altitude was then 130.425 feet.

3 Dash indicates missing data because of dry conditions.

4 SG-OC is the staff gage located at the open channel near wells 0-5A, 5B (fig. 8). The zero altitude of this gage after installation (August 10,1984) was 124.764 feet. After the winter, the gage was releveled (May 7,1985), and zero altitude was then 124.845 feet.

5 Dash indicates missing data because of ice.

6 SG-CQ is the staff gage located at the edge of the cedar swamp near wells CQ-3A, 3B (fig. 8). The zero altitude of this gage, measured on May 7, 1985, was 124.464 feet.

7 Stream stage was not measured.

68

Page 75: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 15.--Altitude of the water table in McDonalds Branch basin: Data fromwater-level observation wells

Sitename

C-lC-lC-lC-lC-lC-lC-lC-lC-lC-lC-lC-lC-lC-lC-lC-lC-lC-lC-lC-l

C-2AC-2AC-2AC-2AC-2AC-2AC-2AC-2AC-2AC-2AC-2AC-2AC-2AC-2AC-2AC-2AC-2AC-2AC-2AC-2AC-2A

C-2BC-2B

Dateof

measurement

07/20/198407/25/198407/31/198410/26/198401/30/198503/01/198504/02/198505/09/198506/05/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198510/02/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

06/29/198407/20/198407/25/198407/31/198410/26/198401/30/198503/01/198504/02/198505/09/198506/05/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198510/02/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

06/29/198407/20/1984

Altitude 1(feet)

121.61121.58121.53121.172___

2__ _

120.94120.87120.78120.69120.54120.37120.46120.27120.60120.73120.63121.20121.22121.15

129.82128.84128.84128.65127.10126.67126.92127.05126.78126.65126.51126.30126.13125.74125.57125.44126.43126.80127.79128.10128.39

122.45122.28

Sitename

C-2BC-2BC-2BC-2BC-2BC-2BC-2BC-2BC-2BC-2BC-2BC-2BC-2BC-2BC-2BC-2BC-2BC-2BC-2B

C-3C-3C-3C-3C-3C-3C-3C-3C-3C-3C-3C-3C-3C-3C-3C-3C-3C-3C-3C-3

C-4

C-4C-4

Dateof

measurement

07/25/198407/31/198410/26/198401/30/198503/01/198504/02/198505/09/198506/05/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198510/02/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

07/20/198407/25/198407/31/198410/26/198401/30/198503/01/198504/02/198505/09/198506/05/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198510/02/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

07/20/1984

07/25/198407/31/1984

Altitude 1(feet)

122.20122.13122.09121.43121.56121.46121.31121.29121.12120.95120.74120.82120.64120.83121.26121.05121.70121.72121.71

122.00121.87121.80121.42121.20121.35121.43121.10121.10120.92120.73120.57120.67120.49120.68121.00120.89121.50121.49121.46

122.61

122.313__ .

69

Page 76: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 15.--Altitude of the water table in McDonalds Branch basin: Data fromwater-level observation wells- -Continued.

Sitename

C-4C-4C-4C-4C-4C-4C-4C-4C-4C-4C-4C-4C-4C-4C-4

C-5AC-5AC-5AC-5AC-5AC-5AC-5AC-5AC-5AC-5AC-5AC-5AC-5AC-5AC-5AC-5AC-5AC-5AC-5AC-5AC-5A

C-5BC-5BC-5BC-5BC-5B

Dateof

measurement

10/26/198401/30/198503/01/198504/02/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198510/02/198511/01/198511/29/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

06/29/198407/20/198407/25/198407/31/198410/26/198401/30/198503/01/198504/02/198505/09/198506/05/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198510/02/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

06/29/198407/20/198407/25/198407/31/198410/26/1984

Altitude 1(feet)

122.363_ . _

3. _ .

3 ...

3. . _

3. . _

3. . .

3. . .

3 ...

3. _ .

3. . .

3 ...

3. . .

3. . .

3__ .

120.51120.44120.42120.39120.26120.14119.21120.13120.07120.25119.99120.11119.79119.87119.76119.90120.16119.99120.30120.33120.25

120.72120.66120.62120.57120.41

Sitename

C-5BC-5BC-5BC-5BC-5BC-5BC-5BC-5BC-5BC-5BC-5BC-5BC-5BC-5BC-5BC-5B

C-6AC-6AC-6AC-6AC-6AC-6AC-6AC-6AC-6AC-6AC-6AC-6AC-6AC-6AC-6AC-6A

C-6BC-6BC-6BC-6BC-6BC-6BC-6BC-6BC-6B

Dateof

measurement

01/30/198503/01/198504/02/198505/09/198506/05/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198510/02/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

07/20/198407/25/198407/31/198410/26/198401/30/198503/01/198504/02/198505/09/198507/02/198510/02/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/1986

07/20/198407/25/198407/31/198410/26/198401/30/198503/01/198504/02/198505/09/198507/02/1985

Altitude 1(feet)

120.23120.32120.31120.17120.26120.07119.79119.87119.94119.82119.96120.14120.07120.44120.45120.37

129.90129.79129.61127.99127.48127.75127.73127.54127.33126.59126.52126.48127.66127.55128.71128.96

130.53129.96129.49126.72125.57125.55125.54125.53125.42

70

Page 77: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 15.--Altitude of the water table in McDonalds Branch basin: Data fromwater-level observation wells --Continued.

Sitename

C-6BC-6BC-6BC-6BC-6BC-6BC-6B

CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1CQ-1

CQ-2CQ-2CQ-2CQ-2CQ-2CQ-2CQ-2CQ-2CQ-2

Dateof

measurement

10/02/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/1986

06/29/198407/20/198407/25/198407/31/198408/06/198408/13/198408/22/198408/29/198408/31/198410/25/198401/30/198503/01/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

06/29/198407/20/198407/25/198408/06/198408/13/198408/22/198408/29/198408/31/198410/25/1984

Altitude 1(feet)

124.92124.94124.87125.38125.70126.36126.75

128.01127.62127.51127.39127.38127.31127.11126.96126.94126.38125.91126.05126.00125.86125.71125.61125.51125.18125.33125.01125.17125.60125.72126.54126.85127.15

126.15125.98125.91125.70125.77125.59125.48125.46124.96

Sitename

CQ-2CQ-2CQ-2CQ-2CQ-2CQ-2CQ-2CQ-2CQ-2CQ-2CQ-2CQ-2CQ-2CQ-2CQ-2CQ-2

CQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3ACQ-3A

Dateof

measurement

01/30/198503/01/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

06/29/198407/20/198407/25/198407/31/198408/06/198408/13/198408/22/198408/29/198408/31/198410/25/198401/30/198503/01/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

Altitude 1(feet)

124.54124.75124.56124.31124.15123.98123.72123.40123.47123.16123.32124.01123.81124.90124.95125.00

125.68125.69125.65125.61125.79125.69125.57125.54125.50125.47125.11125.26125.28124.88124.69124.42124.33123.95124.61123.89124.52124.67124.69125.35125.36125.36

71

Page 78: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 15.--Altitude of the water table in McDonalds Branch basin: Data fromwater-level observation wells --Continued.

Sitename

CQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3BCQ-3B

CQ-4CQ-4CQ-4CQ-4CQ-4CQ-4CQ-4CQ-4CQ-4CQ-4CQ-4CQ-4CQ-4CQ-4CQ-4CQ-4CQ-4CQ-4

Dateof

measurement

06/29/198407/20/198407/25/198407/31/198408/06/198408/13/198408/22/198408/29/198410/25/198401/30/198503/01/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

07/20/198407/25/198407/31/198408/06/198408/13/198408/22/198408/29/198408/31/198410/25/198401/30/198503/01/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/1985

Altitude 1(feet)

126.34125.96125.89125.77125.90125.77125.61125.52124.99124.58124.78124.61124.37124.22124.06123.79123.48123.53123.23123.41124.09123.88124.98125.03125.07

4. ..

4. ..

127.55127.15127.29127.11126.91126.92126.15125.55125.66125.57125.47125.38125.29125.15124.88124.72

Sitename

CQ-4CQ-4CQ-4CQ-4CQ-4CQ-4

CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5CQ-5

CQ-6CQ-6CQ-6CQ-6CQ-6CQ-6CQ-6CQ-6CQ-6CQ-6CQ-6

Dateof

measurement

11/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/1986

06/29/198407/20/198407/25/198407/31/198408/06/198408/13/198408/22/198408/29/198410/25/198401/30/198503/01/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

08/13/198408/22/198408/29/198410/25/198401/30/198503/01/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/1985

Altitude 1(feet)

124.54124.49125.01125.16125.91126.43

126.55126.19126,20126.06126.20126.06125.89125.78125.28124.82125.06124.85124.57124.41124.25123.97123.65123.73123.3123.58124.246124.06125.18125.29125.31

126.27126.12125.95125.29124.82125.00124.83124.58124.43124.26124.03

72

Page 79: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 15.--Altitude of the water table in McDonalds Branch basin: Data fromwater-level observation wells- -Continued.

Sitename

CQ-6CQ-6CQ-6CQ-6CQ-6CQ-6CQ-6CQ-6CQ-6

CQ-7CQ-7CQ-7CQ-7CQ-7CQ-7CQ-7CQ-7CQ-7CQ-7CQ-7CQ-7CQ-7CQ-7CQ-7CQ-7CQ-7CQ-7CQ-7CQ-7

CQ-8CQ-8CQ-8CQ-8CQ-8CQ-8CQ-8CQ-8CQ-8CQ-8CQ-8CQ-8CQ-8

Dateof

measurement

08/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

08/13/198408/22/198408/29/198410/25/198401/30/198503/01/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198510/02/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

08/31/198410/25/198401/30/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/1985

Altitude 1(feet)

123.68123.70123.38123.49124.17124.02124.12125.28125.47

126.40126.23126.11125.53125.00125.16125.00124.73124.56124.38124.10123.77123.76123.49123.62124.34124.13125.31125.37125.47

126.80126.92125.59125.60125.48125.36125.25125.08124.81124.74124.51124.53125.05

Sitename

CQ-8CQ-8CQ-8CQ-8

CQ-9CQ-9CQ-9CQ-9CQ-9CQ-9CQ-9CQ-9CQ-9CQ-9CQ-9CQ-9CQ-9CQ-9CQ-9CQ-9CQ-9CQ-9CQ-9CQ-9

CQ-10CQ-10CQ-10CQ-10CQ-10CQ-10CQ-10CQ-10CQ-10CQ-10CQ-10CQ-10CQ-10CQ-10CQ-10CQ-10CQ-10

Dateof

measurement

01/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

08/22/198408/29/198408/31/198410/25/198401/30/198502/26/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

08/31/198410/25/198401/30/198404/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

Altitude 1(feet)

125.15125.99126.38126.82

127.27127.10127.12126.33125.77126.23125.90125.69125.59125.51125.33125.08124.99124.77124.76125.26125.41126.23126.68127.25

126.64126.23125.68125.75125.60125.42125.31125.13

5 124.835 125.235 124.655 124.955 125.345 125.345 126.385 126.585 126.72

73

Page 80: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 15.--Altitude of the water table in McDonalds Branch basin: Data fromwater-level observation wells- -Continued.

Sitename

CQ-11CQ-11CQ-11CQ-11CQ-11CQ-11CQ-11CQ-11CQ-11CQ-11CQ-11CQ-11CQ-11CQ-11CQ-11CQ-11CQ-11CQ-11CQ-11CQ-11CQ-11

H-lH-lH-lH-lH-lH-lH-lH-lH-lH-lH-lH-lH-lH-lH-lH-lH-lH-lH-lH-lH-l

Dateof

measurement

08/06/198408/13/198408/22/198408/29/198410/25/198401/30/198503/01/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

06/29/198407/20/198407/25/198407/31/198408/07/198408/10/198410/25/198401/30/198502/27/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/1986

Altitude 1(feet)

127.11127.28127.10126.92126.13125.57125.67125.57125.47125.38125.30125.11124.89124.72124.56124.50124.96125.16125.90126.39127.02

132.39131.80131.70131.52131.65131.44129.49128.363_ _ _

3 _ _ _

3_ _ _

3 _ _ _

3. _ _

3_ _ _

3 _ _ _

3_ __

3 _ _ _

3_ _ _

3. _ _

3_ _ _

6__ _

Sitename

H-2H-2H-2H-2H-2H-2H-2H-2H-2H-2H-2H-2H-2H-2H-2H-2H-2H-2H-2H-2H-2H-2H-2

H-3AH-3AH-3AH-3AH-3AH-3AH-3AH-3AH-3AH-3AH-3AH-3AH-3AH-3AH-3AH-3AH-3AH-3AH-3A

Dateof

measurement

06/29/198407/20/198407/25/198407/31/198408/07/198408/10/198410/25/198401/30/198502/27/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

06/29/198407/20/198407/25/198407/31/198408/07/198408/10/198410/25/198401/30/198502/27/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/1985

Altitude 1(feet)

132.65132.09131.99131.79131.94131.70129.66128.41128.36128.113_ _ _

3 _ _ _

3 _ _ _

3 _ _ _

3_ _ _

3 _ _ _

3_ . _

3 _ _ _

3 _ _ _

3 _ _ _

3_ _ _

7 _ _ _

7 _ _ _

133.11

132.62

132.55132.37132.66132.56130.17129.61129.903_ _ _

3_ _ _

3_ _ _

3 _ _ _

3 _ _ _

3_ _ _

3_ _ _

3_ _ _

130.46

130.21

74

Page 81: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 15.--Altitude of the water table in McDonalds Branch basin: Data fromwater-level observation wells- -Continued.

Sitename

H-3AH-3A

H-3BH-3BH-3BH-3BH-3BH-3BH-3BH-3BH-3BH-3BH-3BH-3BH-3BH-3BH-3BH-3BH-3BH-3BH-3BH-3BH-3BH-3BH-3B

H-3CH-3CH-3CH-3CH-3CH-3CH-3CH-3CH-3CH-3CH-3CH-3CH-3CH-3CH-3CH-3CH-3C

Dateof

measurement

01/23/198602/26/1986

06/29/198407/20/198407/25/198407/31/198408/07/198408/10/198410/25/198401/30/198502/27/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

06/29/198407/20/198407/25/198407/31/198408/07/198408/10/198410/25/198401/30/198502/27/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/1985

Altitude 1(feet)

3_ __

6__ _

132.73132.09131.99131.79131.78131.64129.68128.46128.43128.18127.79127.53126.24126.90126.52126.18125.99125.85126.52

8 126.41128.41128.30128.65

132.67132.06131.94131.75131.79131.65129.70128.46128.41128.18127.79127.52127.24126.88126.51126.17125.99

Sitename

H-3CH-3CH-3CH-3CH-3CH-3C

H-4H-4H-4H-4H-4H-4H-4H-4H-4H-4H-4H-4H-4H-4H-4H-4H-4H-4H-4H-4H-4H-4H-4

H-5AH-5AH-5AH-5AH-5AH-5AH-5AH-5AH-5AH-5AH-5AH-5AH-5A

Dateof

measurement

11/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

06/29/198407/20/198407/25/198407/31/198408/07/198408/10/198410/25/198401/30/198502/27/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

06/29/198407/20/198407/25/198407/31/198408/07/198408/10/198410/25/198401/30/198502/27/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/1985

Altitude 1(feet)

125.86126.51

8 126.41127.44127.84128.54

132.91132.49132.46132.21132.49132.17130.09128.75128,71128.41127.99127.73127.43126.91126.66126.13126.00125.81126.52126.36127.45127.77128.50

132.23132.26132.27132.20132.38132.24131.89131.91132.10132.13131.88131.57131.19

75

Page 82: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 15.--Altitude of the water table in McDonalds Branch basin: Data fromwater-level observation wells- -Continued.

Sitename

H-5AH-5AH-5AH-5AH-5AH-5AH-5AH-5AH-5AH-5A

H-5BH-5BH-5BH-5BH-5BH-5BH-5BH-5BH-5BH-5BH-5BH-5BH-5BH-5BH-5BH-5BH-5BH-5BH-5BH-5BH-5BH-5BH-5B

0-1A0-1A0-1A0-1A0-1A0-1A0-1A0-1A0-1A

Dateof

measurement

07/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

06/29/198407/20/198407/25/198407/31/198408/07/198408/10/198410/25/198401/30/198502/27/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

06/29/198407/20/198407/25/198407/31/198408/13/198410/25/198410/26/198401/30/198502/28/1985

Altitude 1(feet)

130.14128.87131.16130.93131.76131.79131.77132.07131.98131.73

132.64132.01131.93131.73131.81131.62129.61128.03127.90127.62127.25126.97126.70126.33125.94125.63125.43125.32125.93125.83126.86127.21127.94

126.64126.26126.19126.07126.13125.13125.13124.60124.80

Sitename

0-1A0-1A0-1A0-1A0-1A0-1A0-1A0-1A0-1A0-1A0-1A0-1A0-1A0-1A

0-1B0-1B0-1B0-1B0-1B0-1B0-1B0-1B0-1B0-1B0-1B0-1B0-1B0-1B0-1B0-1B0-1B0-1B0-1B0-1B0-1B0-1B0-1B

0-20-20-20-20-2

Dateof

measurement

04/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

06/29/198407/20/198407/25/198407/31/198408/13/198410/25/198410/26/198401/30/198502/28/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

07/20/198407/25/198407/31/198408/13/198410/26/1984

Altitude 1(feet)

124.59124.34124.15123.957 ...

123.33123.35123.05123.18123.94123.69124.94124.98125.03

126.19126.30126.23126.12126.13125.14125.13124.60124.79124.59124.31124.13123.94123.67123.33123.38123.05123.19123.89123.67124.84124.91125.01

126.41126.36126.24126.24125.28

76

Page 83: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 15.--Altitude of the water table in HcDonalds Branch basin: Data fromwater-level observation wells --Continued.

Sitename

0-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-20-2

0-30-30-30-30-30-30-30-30-30-30-30-30-30-30-30-30-30-30-30-30-30-30-3

0-40-40-4

Dateof

measurement

01/30/198502/28/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

06/29/198407/20/198407/25/198407/31/198408/13/198408/29/198410/26/198401/30/198502/28/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

07/20/198407/25/198407/31/1984

Altitude 1(feet)

124.73124.91124.72124.45124.37124.09123.80123.48123.53123.19123.32124.03123.81124.98125.05125.16

126.31125.97125.90125.79125.79125.45124.85124.36124.53124.35124.09123.91123.74123.45123.14123.20122.89123.01123.69123.49124.60124.69124.79

126.49126.43126.30

Sitename

0-40-40-40-40-40-40-40-40-40-40-40-40-40-40-40-40-40-40-40-4

0-5A0-5A0-5A0-5A0-5A0-5A0-5A0-5A0-5A0-5A0-5A0-5A0-5A0-5A0-5A0-5A0-5A0-5A0-5A0-5A0-5A0-5A0-5A

Dateof

measurement

08/13/198408/22/198408/29/198410/25/198401/30/198502/28/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

06/29/198407/20/198407/25/198407/31/198408/13/198410/25/198410/26/198401/30/198502/28/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

Altitude 1(feet)

126.32125.98125.98125.36124.81125.00124.80124.54124.36124.16123.87123.55123.60123.26123.39124.11123.91125.07125.15125.26

126.97126.78126.76126.65126.73125.87125.85125.14125.62125.38125.08124.72124.41124.18123.77124.42123.73124.51124.87124.57125.91125.90125.77

77

Page 84: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 15.--Altitude of the water table in McDonalds Branch basin: Data fromwater-level observation wells- -Continued.

Sitename

0-5B0-5B0-5B0-5B0-5B0-5B0-5B0-5B0-5B0-5B0-5B0-5B0-5B0-5B0-5B0-5B0-5B0-5B0-5B0-5B0-5B0-5B0-5B

0-60-60-60-60-60-60-60-60-60-60-60-60-60-60-60-60-60-60-6

Dateof

measurement

06/29/198407/20/198407/25/198407/31/198408/13/198410/25/198410/26/198401/30/198502/28/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

07/20/198407/25/198407/31/198408/06/198408/13/198410/25/198401/30/198502/28/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/1986

Altitude 1(feet)

127.08126.90126.87126.81126.58126.18126.18125.77125.67125.61125.43125.28125.04124.18123.74123.78123.42123.54124.24124.07125.22125.32125.43

127.62127.55127.42127.65127.43126.29125.64125.81125.60125.31125.11124.91124.60124.25124.29123.92124.03124.77124.56

Sitename

0-60-60-6

0-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-70-7

0-80-80-80-80-80-80-80-80-80-80-80-80-80-80-80-80-80-80-8

Dateof

measurement

02/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

08/06/198408/13/198410/26/198401/30/198502/28/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

08/06/198408/13/198410/26/198401/30/198502/28/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

Altitude 1(feet)

125.81125.92126.06

126.89126.93125.87125.24125.45125.23124.95124.75124.56124.26123.92124.01123.63123.77124.50124.26125.48125.57125.68

128.20128.08126.82126.15126.31126.08125.77125.56125.36125.03124.68124.64124.31124.37125.18124.95126.26126.39126.56

78

Page 85: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 15.--Altitude of the water table in McDonalds Branch basin: Data fromwater-level observation wells- -Continued.

Sitename

0-90-90-90-90-90-90-90-90-90-90-90-90-90-90-90-90-90-90-9

0-100-100-100-100-100-100-100-100-10

Dateof

measurement

08/06/198408/13/198410/26/198401/30/198502/28/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198603/21/198602/26/198605/21/1986

08/06/198408/13/198410/26/198401/30/198502/28/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/1985

Altitude 1(feet)

127.43127.55126.319_ _ _

9_ _ _

125.57125.42125.22125.03124.74124.39124.23124.05124.08124.87124.67126.05125.88126.15

127.81127.65126.40125.70125.91125.65125.40125.17124.93

Sitename

0-100-100-100-100-100-100-100-100-100-10

0-11A0-11A0-11A0-11A0-11A0-11A0-11A0-11A0-11A0-11A0-11A0-11A0-11A0-11A0-11A0-11A0-11A0-11A

Dateof

measurement

07/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

08/13/198410/26/198401/30/198502/28/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/198509/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

Altitude 1(feet)

124.66124.29124.54123.94124.20124.85124.58125.96126.01126.09

127.3126.16125.756125.96125.83125.62125.48125.34125.10124.80124.54124.50124.46125.35125.46126.57126.83127.09

79

Page 86: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 15.--Altitude of the water table in McDonalds Branch basin: water-level observation wells--Continued

Data from

Sitename

0-11B0-11B0-11B0-11B0-11B0-11B0-11B0-11B0-11B

Dateof

measurement

10/26/198401/30/198502/28/198504/01/198505/09/198506/04/198507/02/198507/30/198508/29/1985

Altitude 1(feet)

129.70124.16124.32124.14123.90123.71123.54123.26122.94

Sitename

0-11B0-11B0-11B0-11B0-11B0-11B0-11B0-11B

Dateof

measurement

09/30/198511/01/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

Altitude 1(feet)

123.04122.70122.84123.49123.29124.39124.45124.56

1 Referenced to sea level.2 Well found vandalized on 1/30/85, was reinstalled, and resurveyed on 3/29/85.3 Well was dry.4 Well was not developed yet.5 The altitude of measuring point (133.473) of well CQ-10 was altered byvandalism sometime prior to 11/10/1986, when the change was first noted in the field. The new altitude of measuring point (133.876) was determined by levels on 01/19/1988. Comparisons of water levels with those from nearby well QWC-5A suggest that the change occurred between 07/30/1985 and 09/30/1985. Because no comparisons were possible for 08/29/1985, water levels were adjusted beginning 09/30/1985.

6 Well was vandalized, removed, and not reinstalled.7 Water level was not measured.8 Well was vandalized between 1/23/86 and 2/26/86 and was resurveyed.9 Well found vandalized on 1/30/85, was reinstalled, and resurveyed on 3/28/85.

80

Page 87: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 16.--Altitude of the water table in McDonalds Branch basin: Data from water-quality wells

[--- indicates missing data]

Site name

LEAD WELLLEAD WELLLEAD WELLLEAD WELLLEAD WELL

QWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1A

QWC - IBQWC-1BQWC -IBQWC - IBQWC -IBQWC -IBQWC -IBQWC -IBQWC -IBQWC -IBQWC -IBQWC -IBQWC -IBQWC -IBQWC -IBQWC -IBQWC -IB

Date of

measurement

11/29/198512/23/198501/23/198602/26/198605/21/1986

10/25/198402/07/198503/06/198504/03/198505/06/198505/09/198506/05/198507/01/198507/30/198508/23/198508/29/198509/30/198510/28/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/24/198603/21/198605/21/1986

10/25/198402/07/198503/06/198504/03/198505/06/198505/09/198506/05/198507/01/198507/30/198509/30/198510/28/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/24/198603/21/198605/21/1986

Altitude 1 (feet)

131.63131.92131.76132.09133.78

125.24124.86124.95124.83124.73124.57124.62124.19123.96123.76123.53124.09123.38123.83124.25124.26125.13125.15125.18

124.69124.80124.88124.72124.59124.51124.42124.19123.92123.61123.38123.53124.16124.00125.03125.16125.29

Site name

QWC-2AQWC-2AQWC-2AQWC-2AQWC-2AQWC-2AQWC-2AQWC-2AQWC-2AQWC-2AQWC-2AQWC-2AQWC-2AQWC-2AQWC-2AQWC-2AQWC-2A

QWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2B

QWC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3A

Date of Altitude 1

measurement (feet)

10/25/198402/08/198503/06/198504/05/198505/06/198506/06/198507/02/198507/30/198508/26/198509/30/198510/28/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/24/198603/21/198605/21/1986

10/25/198402/08/198503/06/198504/03/198505/06/198506/06/198507/02/198507/30/198508/26/198509/30/198510/28/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/24/198603/21/198605/20/1986

10/25/198402/08/198503/07/198504/04/198504/05/198505/08/198506/07/198507/02/1985

125.61125.28125.32125.23125.19125.01124.77124.50124.37124.66124.05124.40124.70124.71125.53125.59125.65

126.11125.69125.82125.70125.52125.37125.15124.97124.61124.58124.33124.46125.16124.97125.94126.12126.25

125.76124.69124.71124.66124.65124.43124.31124.12

81

Page 88: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 16.--Altitude of the water table in McDonalds Branch basin: Data from

Sitename

QWC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3A

QWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3B

QWC-4QWC-4QWC-4QWC-4QWC-4QWC-4QWC-4QWC-4QWC-4QWC-4QWC-4QWC-4QWC-4QWC-4QWC-4

water-quality

Date of

measurement

07/30/198508/26/198509/30/198510/28/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/25/198603/21/198605/21/1986

02/08/198503/07/198504/04/198504/05/198505/08/198506/07/198507/02/198507/30/198508/26/198509/30/198510/29/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/25/198603/21/198605/21/1986

10/25/198402/11/198503/08/198504/05/198505/08/198506/07/198507/30/198508/27/198509/30/198510/29/198511/26/198512/20/198502/25/198603/21/198605/21/1986

wells- -Continued.

Altitude 1(feet)

123.83123.59123.59123.28123.48124.14124.11124.89---

125.19

124.49124.68124.54124.56124.30124.19124.02---

123.48123.47123.19123.33123.99123.77124.89124.89125.13

126.02125.52125.61125.52125.46---

125.02124.79124.69124.46124.47125.00125.90126.30126.85

Sitename

QWC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5A

QWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5B

QWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1A

Date of

measurement

10/25/198402/07/198503/07/198504/04/198505/07/198506/06/198507/01/198507/30/198508/23/198509/30/198510/28/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/24/198603/21/198605/21/1986

10/25/198402/07/198503/07/198504/04/198505/07/198506/06/198507/01/198507/30/198508/23/198509/30/198510/28/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/24/198603/21/198605/21/1986

10/25/198401/30/198502/27/198503/29/198505/01/198505/09/198505/29/198506/26/1985

Altitude 1(feet)

126.14125.77125.75125.71125.65125.49125.19125.07124.89125.16124.75124.90125.32125.32126.23126.45126.76

124.20124.34124.49124.36124.24124.06123.83123.60...

123.32123.06123.23123.90123.67124.64124.77124.95

131.91132.07132.19132.08131.84131.97131.84131.12

82

Page 89: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 16.--Altitude of the water table in McDonalds Branch basin: Data from

Sitename

QWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1A

QWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1B

QWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2A

water-quality

Dateof

measurement

07/02/198507/30/198508/20/198509/30/198510/23/198511/26/198512/16/198501/23/198602/20/198603/21/198605/21/1986

10/25/198401/30/198502/27/198503/29/198505/01/198505/09/198505/29/198506/26/198507/30/198508/20/198509/30/198510/23/198511/26/198512/16/198501/23/198602/20/198603/21/198605/21/1986

10/25/198401/30/198503/01/198503/28/198504/30/198505/29/198506/25/198507/30/198508/20/198509/30/198510/23/198511/26/198512/16/1985

wells- -Continued.

Altitude 1(feet)

130.75129.56129.02131.41131.22131.75132.05131.75132.12131.90131.68

129.39128.27128.24127.95127.65127.59127.37127.10126.67126.39125.96125.83125.64126.22126.13126.96127.52128.35

129.50128.37128.22128.02127.63127.35127.11126.64126.37125.94125.81125.64126.38

Sitename

QWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2A

QWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2B

QWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3A

QWH-3BQWH-3BQWH-3BQWH-3B

Dateof

measurement

01/23/198602/20/198603/21/198605/21/1986

10/25/198401/30/198503/01/198503/28/198504/30/198505/29/198506/25/198507/30/198508/20/198509/30/198510/23/198511/26/198512/16/198501/23/198602/20/198603/21/198605/21/1986

10/25/198402/01/198503/04/198504/01/198505/01/198505/31/198506/26/198507/30/198509/30/198510/23/198511/26/198512/17/198501/23/198602/25/198603/21/198605/21/1986

10/25/198402/01/198503/04/198504/01/1985

Altitude 1(feet)

126.19127.10127.60128.38

129.49128.25128.12127.94127.63127.34127.10126.64126.33125.82125.83125.62126.21126.15126.97127.52128.32

129.88128.60128.44128.27127.96127.67127.40125.97126.22...

125.91126.54126.43127.47127.80128.63

129.80128.54128.38128.19

83

Page 90: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 16.--Altitude of the water table in McDonalds Branch basin: Data fromwater -quality wells --Continued.

Sitename

QWH-3BQWH-3BQWH-3BQWH-3BQWH-3BQWH-3BQWH-3BQWH-3BQWH-3BQWH-3BQWH-3B

QWH-4AQWH-4AQWH-4AQWH-4AQWH-4AQWH-4AQWH-4AQWH-4AQWH-4AQWH-4AQWH-4AQWH-4AQWH-4AQWH-4AQWH-4AQWH-4AQWH-4A

QWH-4BQWH-4BQWH-4BQWH-4BQWH-4BQWH-4BQWH-4BQWH-4BQWH-4BQWH-4BQWH-4BQWH-4BQWH-4BQWH-4B

Dateof

measurement

04/04/198505/01/198505/31/198506/26/198508/21/198510/24/198511/26/198512/17/198501/23/198602/25/198605/21/1986

10/25/198401/30/198503/01/198503/28/198505/01/198505/30/198506/26/198507/30/198508/21/198509/30/198510/24/198511/26/198512/17/198601/23/198602/20/198603/21/198605/21/1986

10/25/198401/30/198503/01/198503/28/198505/01/198505/30/198506/26/198507/30/198508/21/198509/30/198510/24/198511/26/198512/17/198501/23/1986

Altitude 1(feet)

128.16127.87127.61127.34126.62126.07125.80126.47126.19127.39128.37

129.52128.25128.18127.95127.66127.38127.09126.27126.40125.93125.83125.64126.25126.18127.01127.55128.37

129.52128.27128.18127.98127.65127.37127.11126.67126.41125.95125.82125.65126.28126.18

Sitename

QWH-4BQWH-4BQWH-4B

QWH-5AQWH-5AQWH-5AQWH-5AQWH-5AQWH-5A

QWH-5BQWH-5BQWH-5BQWH-5BQWH-5BQWH-5B

QWO-1AQWO-1AQWO-1AQWO-1AQWO-1AQWO-1AQWO-1AQWO-1AQWO-1AQWO-1AQWO-1AQWO-1AQWO-1AQWO-1AQWO-1AQWO-1AQWO-1AQWO-1A

QWO-1BQWO-1BQWO-1BQWO-1BQWO-1BQWO-1BQWO-1B

Dateof

measurement

02/20/198603/21/198605/21/1986

11/29/198512/23/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

11/29/198512/23/198501/23/198602/26/198603/21/198605/21/1986

10/26/198402/04/198503/04/198504/01/198505/02/198505/09/198505/31/198506/27/198507/30/198508/21/198509/30/198510/24/198511/26/198512/17/198501/23/198602/21/198603/21/198605/21/1986

10/26/198402/04/198503/04/198504/01/198505/02/198505/09/198505/31/1985

Altitude 1(feet)

127.00127.55128.35

136.95136.45136.47136.82136.46136.14

127.24127.87127.84129.06129.39130.02

123.06125.33125.38124.98124.62124.91124.52124.56124.21123.97123.99123.68123.78124.49124.18125.27125.49125.66

125.75125.23125.03125.13124.80124.84124.67

84

Page 91: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 16.--Altitude of the water table in McDonalds Branch basin: Data fromwater -quality wells- -Continued.

Sitename

QWO-1BQWO-1BQWO-1BQWO-1BQWO-1BQWO-1BQWO-1BQWO-1BQWO-1BQWO-1B

QWO-2AQWO-2AQWO-2AQWO-2AQWO-2AQWO-2AQWO-2AQWO-2AQWO-2AQWO-2AQWO-2AQWO-2AQWO-2AQWO-2AQWO-2AQWO-2AQWO-2AQWO-2A

QWO-2BQWO-2BQWO-2BQWO-2BQWO-2BQWO-2BQWO-2BQWO-2BQWO-2BQWO-2BQWO-2BQWO-2B

Dateof

measurement

06/27/198507/30/198509/30/198510/24/198511/26/198512/17/198501/23/198602/21/198603/21/198605/21/1986

10/26/198402/04/198503/05/198504/02/198505/02/198505/09/198506/04/198506/27/198507/30/198508/22/198509/30/198510/25/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/21/198603/21/198605/21/1986

10/26/198402/04/198503/05/198504/02/198505/02/198505/09/198506/04/198506/27/198507/30/198508/22/198509/30/198510/25/1985

Altitude 1(feet)

124.53124.18123.89123.61123.67124.38124.09125.09125.35125.57

125.94125.55125.53125.37124.95125.08124.80124.68124.34124.06124.27123.79123.98124.71124.38125.62125.69125.83

125.84125.29125.38125.15124.87124.88124.69124.56124.23123.99123.95123.67

Sitename

QWO-2BQWO-2BQWO-2BQWO-2BQWO-2BQWO-2B

QWO-3AQWO-3AQWO-3AQWO-3AQWO-3AQWO-3AQWO-3AQWO-3AQWO-3AQWO-3AQWO-3AQWO-3AQWO-3AQWO-3AQWO-3AQWO-3AQWO-3A

QWO-3BQWO-3BQWO-3BQWO-3BQWO-3BQWO-3BQWO-3BQWO-3BQWO-3BQWO-3BQWO-3BQWO-3BQWO-3BQWO-3BQWO-3BQWO-3B

Dateof

measurement

11/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/21/198603/21/198605/21/1986

10/26/198402/05/198503/05/198504/02/198505/03/198506/04/198506/28/198507/30/198508/22/198509/30/198510/25/198511/26/198512/20/198501/23/198602/21/198603/21/198605/21/1986

10/26/198402/05/198503/05/198504/02/198504/04/198505/03/198506/04/198506/28/198507/30/198508/22/198509/30/198510/25/198512/20/198501/23/198602/21/198605/21/1986

Altitude 1(feet)

123.74124.46124.22125.28125.49125.71

126.68126.07126.12125.91125.64125.39125.25124.88124.61__.

124.24124.31124.99124.80125.98126.20126.44

126.62126.01126.11125.87125.86125.63125.37125.23124.87124.59124.51124.23125.01124.81125.93126.36

1 Referenced to sea level

85

Page 92: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 17.--Chemical analyses of precipitation in McDonalds Branch basin. January 24. 1985 through March 18. 1986

[Precipitation was collected weekly and composited to monthly samples; all cations, anions. and trace metals were measured as dissolved constituents; pS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; meq/L, millieguivalents per liter; mg/L, milligrams per liter; pg/L, micrograms per liter; lab, laboratory; --- indicates missing data; < indicates less than]

Site name

PPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BC

PPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1UCPPT-1UCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WC

Sample-collection dates

01/24/1985-02/05/198502/05/1985-02/14/198502/14/1985-02/26/1985*02/26/1985-03/26/198503/26/1 985 - 04/23/ 1 98504/23/1985 - 05/07/198505/07/1985-05/28/198505/28/1985-06/25/198506/25/1985-07/30/198507/30/1985-08/27/198508/27/1985-10/01/198510/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/03/198512/03/1985-12/17/198512/17/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986-03/18/1986

01/24/1985-02/05/198502/05/1985-02/14/198502/14/1985-02/26/1985*02/26/1985-03/26/198503/26/1985-04/23/198504/23/1985-05/07/198505/07/1985-05/28/198505/28/1985-06/25/198506/25/1985-07/30/198507/30/1985-08/27/198508/27/1985-09/24/198509/24/1985-10/01/198510/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/03/198512/03/1985-12/17/198512/17/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986-03/18/1986

pH (units)

District Central lab lab

...4.4

...4.24.7**4.24.54.3**4.1**...

4.44.64.44.14.34.64.4

4.24.8...

4.24.8**4.54.24.14.0......

4.34.44.44.14.34.54.2

4.24.4

5.04.35.24.34.24.34.54.64.54.74.494.144.434.494.23

4.24.6

5.04.35.24.34.24.14.34.25.24.54.54.494.114.384.504.26

Specific conductance

</iS/cm) District Central

lab lab

...

...

...5816343835...29**20232635252835

23...

...4918294237......13**16212233232131

3447

2261123439353324191723.134.025.721.932.9

2636

194612314037363712171319.134.622.318.227.7

Alkalinity Cmeq/L) District

lab

...-0.05

...

...

...- .09...- .09 .04- .03

...

...- .05- .09...

...

...

- .09- .09...

...

...

...

... .03- .10

... .02***

...

Lead (M9/L)

68

125

< 14510

...22213.42.63.82.4

56

24

< 1< 1...6...

11323

< 13.41.81.81.8

86

Page 93: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 17.--Chemical analyses of DreciDltatlon in McDonalds Branch basin, January 24. 1985 through March 18. 1986-Continued

Site name

PPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BC

PPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WC

Sample- col lection dates

01/24/1985-02/05/198502/05/1985-02/14/198502/14/1985-02/26/1985*02/26/1986-03/26/198503/26/1985 - 04/23/198504/23/ 1 985 - 05/07/ 1 98505/07/1985 05/28/198505/28/1985-06/25/198506/25/1985 - 07/30/198507/30/1985-08/27/198508/27/1985-10/01/198510/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1986-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/03/198512/03/1985-12/17/198512/17/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986-03/18/1986

01/24/1985-02/05/198502/05/1985-02/14/198502/14/1985-02/26/1985*02/14/1985-03/26/198503/26/1985-04/23/198504/23/1985-05/07/198505/07/1985-05/28/198505/28/1985-06/25/198506/25/1985-07/30/198507/30/1985-08/27/198508/27/1985-09/24/198509/24/1985-10/01/198510/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/03/198512/03/1985-12/17/198512/17/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986-03/18/1986

Calcium (mg/L)

0.20.36

.42

.74

.10

.08

.18

.15

.34

.37< .01

.15

.16

.09

.31

.25

.21

.14

.22

.16

.44

.10

.05

...

.07

.07

.19

.14< .01< .01< .01< .01

.07

.10

.07

Magnesium (mg/L)

0.03.57

.13

.44

.10

.05

.07

.04

.08

.13

.03

.13

.09

.04

.07

.10

.08

.02

.45

.10

.27

.10

.02

...

.02

.05

.11

.14

.03

.08

.04

.02

.04

.07

.05

Sodium Potassium (mg/L) (mg/L)

0.224.4

.493.3.32.32.16.15.49.77.18

1.2.97.42.71.96.49

.113.5

.401.7.30.20....17.40.67.93.14.75.50.36.37.61.31

0.03.19

.07

.20

.07

.05

.10

.25

.14

.11

.04

.10

.07

.02

.09

.04

.06

.02

.14

.04

.11

.03

.05

...

.06

.03

.08

.08

.04

.07

.04

.05

.04

.04

.04

Ammonium (mg/L)

0.13.09

.41

.89

.35

.49

.53

.86

.62

.32

.14

.14

.13

.15

.24

.10

.36

.13

.06

.32

.77

.37

.48

.54

.40

.30

.41

.05

.12

.12

.11

.14

.22

.09

.28

Aluminum (/tg/L)

1010

< 1040101030203010

< 1012172017819

2020

20502020

...10203020

< 10151524217

32

87

Page 94: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 17.--Chemical analyses of precipitation in McDonalds Branch basin. January 24. 1985 through March 18. 1986--Cool

Site name

PPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BCPPT-1BC

PPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WCPPT-1WC

:inued

Sample-col lection dates

01/24/1985-02/05/198502/05/1985-02/14/198502/14/1985-02/26/1985*02/26/1985-03/26/198503/26/1985 - 04/23/198504/23/1985-05/07/198505/07/1985-05/28/198505/28/1985-06/25/198506/25/1985-07/30/198507/30/1985-08/27/198508/27/1985-10/01/198510/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/03/198512/03/1985-12/17/198512/17/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986-03/18/1986

01/24/1985-02/05/198502/05/1985-02/14/198502/14/1985-02/26/1985*02/26/1985 03/26/198503/26/1985 04/23/198504/23/1985-05/07/198505/07/1985 - 05/28/198505/28/1985-06/25/198506/25/1985-07/30/198507/30/1985 - 08/27/198508/27/1985-09/24/198509/24/1985-10/01/198510/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/03/198512/03/1985-12/17/198512/17/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986-03/18/1986

Sulfate (mg/L)

2.12.1

3.16.41.33.23.84.14.32.61.52.11.62.62.51.62.9

3.01.4

2.54.51.23.03.63.63.53.7.61

1.21.51.22.11.51.22.3

Chloride (mg/L)

0.708.6

.844.4.60.53.38.55.85

1.7.30

2.21.5.56.72

1.3.80

.226.7

.803.2.81.39.37.33.73

1.72.2.60

1.5.79.51.52.84.58

Fluor ide (mg/L)

0.02.02

.02

.04

.01

.04

.03

.03

.04

.03

.02

.03

.03

.02

.03

.03

.04

.01

.02

.02

.03

.01

.02

.05

.04

.04

.03

.05

.01

.03

.03

.02

.02

.01

.02

Bromide (mg/L)

0.02.04

.02

.04

.01

.01

.01

.02

.02< .01< .01

.01

.02

.01< .01

.03

.02

.02

.03

.01

.02

.01

.01

.02

.02

.02< .01< .01< .01

.01

.01

.01< .01

.01

.02

Nitrate (mg/L)

1.71.1

2.63.71.01.94.92.63.21.21.2.99

1.52.82.11.22.2

1.4.75

2.23.1.97

1.82.82.43.11.5.22.78.40

1.12.81.71.01.8

Phosphate <mg/L)

< 0.003< .003

< .031.......031

...

...

...< .031...

....092.215.092.002

< .031

.009< .003

< .031----.031----

.061

.245

.092< .031

.061

88

Page 95: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 17.--Chemical analyses of precipitation in HcDonalds Branch basin. January 24. 1985 through March 18. 1986- Continued

pH (units)

Specific conductance

<«S/cm>Sample-collection District Central

Site name

PPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2B PPT-2BPPT-2B

PPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2W PPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2W

dates

01/24/1985-02/05/198502/05/1985-02/13/198502/13/1985-02/26/1985*02/26/1985-03/26/198503/26/1985-04/23/198504/23/1985-05/07/198505/07/1985-05/28/198505/28/1985-06/25/198506/25/1985-07/30/198507/30/1985-08/27/198508/27/1985-10/01/198510/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/03/198512/03/1985-12/06/198512/06/1985- 12/24/1985f12/24/1985-01/21/198601/21/1985-01/28/1986ft 01/28/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986- 03/18/1986ftt

01/24/1985-02/05/198502/05/1986-02/13/198502/13/1985-02/26/1985*02/26/1985-03/26/198503/26/1985-04/23/198504/23/1985-05/07/198505/07/1985-05/28/198505/28/1985-06/25/198506/25/1985-07/30/198507/30/1985-08/27/198508/27/1985-10/01/198509/24/1985-10/01/1985*10/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/03/198512/03/1985-12/06/19851 2/06/ 1985 -12/24/1 985 f 12/24/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986-03/19/1986ftt

lab

...4.5

...

...4.7**4.24.24.1**4.0**...4.74.54.4...

4.3

4.2

4.24.6

...4.24.7**4.34.3**4.0**4.0**......4.34.54.6**...

4.34.6

lab

4.14.4

5.34.35.04.24.34.14.34.54.54.64.494.05

4.50

4.25

4.24.6

5.14.35.24.34.24.14.2

5.14.54.54.514.09

4.394.50

Districtlab

...

...

...

...19394145...32**202520...

25

36

22...

...5617313543

...13**172020

2321

Centrallab

3550

2260153736434028202022.942.3

24.9

30.7

2838

18511229364339

15171418.839.1

22.217.9

Alkalinity <meq/L>District

lab

...

...

...

... -

-0.07---.

- .04- .04

...

...

- .05***

.

.

.

.

.

...- .09- .15

...

...

...- .04

...

Lead</i9/L)

96

101374

< 156132

< 12

2.2

2.0

165

410

< 17

...

...

...

...1

4< 16

1.81.0

89

Page 96: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

1985 through March 18. 1986-Continued

Site name

PPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2B

PPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2W

Sample- col lection dates

01/24/1985-02/05/198502/05/1985-02/13/198502/13/1985-02/26/1985*02/26/1985-03/26/198503/26/1985-04/23/198504/23/1985-05/07/198505/07/1985-05/28/198505/28/1985-06/25/198506/25/1985-07/30/198507/30/1985-08/27/198508/27/1985-10/01/198510/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/03/198512/03/1985-12/06/198512/06/1985- 12/24/1 985 f12/24/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986-01/28/1986ft01/28/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986- 03/18/1986ftt

01/24/1985-02/05/198502/05/1985-02/13/198502/13/1985-02/26/1985*02/26/1985-03/26/198503/26/1985-04/23/198504/23/1985-05/07/198505/07/1985-05/28/198505/28/1985-06/25/198506/25/1985-07/30/198507/30/1 985 - 08/27/ 1 98508/27/1985-10/01/198509/24/1985-10/01/1985*10/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/03/198512/03/1985-12/06/198512/06/1985- 12/24/1985f12/24/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986- 03/18/1986ftt

Calcium (mg/L)

0.24.39

.40

.68

.20

.20

.16

.20

.21

.33

.01

.15

.11

.10

.45

.29

.14

.18

.15

.58

.10

.06

.13

.15

.09

...

.19< .01< .01< .01< .01

.04

.53

Magnesium (mg/L)

0.02.65

.14

.39

.12

.05

.07

.04

.07

.15

.02

.14

.09

.04

.07

.08

.03

.49

.09

.33

.10

.03

.05

.04

.06

.17

.01

.09

.05

.01

.04

.07

Sodium Potassium (mg/L) (mg/L)

0.244.8

.612.5.45.43.12.15.36.89.19

1.5.95

1.5

.64

.88

.143.7

.341.8.32.24.......38...

1.2.14.86.57.22

.40

.64

0.04.21

.08

.18

.06

.06

.10

.06

.05

.08

.04

.10

.07

.05

.10

.04

.02

.16

.04

.12

.03

.04

...

.03

.03

...

.08

.03

.06

.06

.09

.03

.04

Ammonium (mg/L)

0.15.09

.44

.85

.36

.48

.59

.44

.32

.23

.13

.15

.12

.14

.24

.22

.13

.06

.33

.91

.37

.44

.55

.41

.27

...

.03

.13

.10

.10

.14

.22

.08

Aluminum (/ig/L)

1020

106020202020301010121421

20

15

1010

< 10602010

...

...20

...10

< 10132120

159

90

Page 97: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 17.--Chemical analyses of precipitation in McDonalds Branch basin. January 24. 1985 through March 18. 1986- Continued

Sample-collectionSite name dates

PPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2BPPT-2B

PPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2WPPT-2W

* No ** MA;

01/24/1985-02/05/198502/05/1985-02/13/198502/13/1985-02/26/1985*02/26/1985-03/26/198503/26/1985-04/23/198504/23/1985-05/07/198505/07/ 1 985 - 05/28/1 98505/28/1985-06/25/198506/25/1985-07/30/198507/30/ 1 985 - 08/27/ 1 98508/27/1985-10/01/198510/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/03/198512/03/1985-12/06/198512/06/1985-12/24/1985f12/24/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986- 01/28/1986ft01/28/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986-03/18/1986ftt

01/24/1985-02/05/198502/05/1986-02/13/198502/ 1 3/ 1 985 - 02/26/ 1 985*02/26/1985-03/26/198503/26/1985-04/23/198504/23/1985-05/07/198505/07/1985-05/28/198505/28/1985-06/25/198506/25/1985-07/30/198507/30/1985-08/27/198508/27/1985-10/01/198509/24/1985-10/01/198510/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/03/198512/03/1985-12/06/19851 2/06/ 1985 -12/24/1 985 f12/24/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986-03/18/1986ftt

sample collected because no rainlRurMM>nts <rf nM anrl crw»/-ifir- r-nnr

Sulfate(mg/L)

2.32.2

3.16.11.63.34.14.54.22.81.62.21.62.2

2.7

2.5

2.51.5

2.45.11.12.63.54.13.7....89.3.6.2.9

.6

.1

fell.li ir**-nn/»o »t-

Chloride(mg/L)

0.509.2

1.23.7.79.66.43.42.73

2.0.33

2.61.5.43

.77

.90

.157.2

.793.3.89.46.34.35.73

2.6.37

1.8.89.39

.51

.76

fho nio + r>ir»+ la

Fluoride(mg/L)

0.01.03

.02

.04

.01

.02

.04

.05

.03

.03

.02

.03

.03

.02

.04

.02

.01

.03

.02

.04< .01

.02

.04

.04

.05

...

.03

.01

.02

.03

.03

.02

.01

K uiAr»A maria mn

Bromide(mg/L)

0.02.04

.02

.03

.01

.02

.01

.02

.02

.33

.01

.02

.02

.01

< .01

.03

.02

.04

.02

.03< .01

.01

.01

.02

.02

< .01< .01

.02

.01

.01

< .01< .01

i ml i 1 + Ar*Arl e

Nitrate(mg/L)

2.01.1

2.33.61.22.42.52.83.31.21.11.01.43.9

1.9

2.1

1.4.68

2.03.7.97

1.92.53.03.2

.31

.85

.731.13.4

1.41.0

ttfWhl AC

Phosphate(mg/L)

< 0.003< .003

< .031

.061--

.092

.429

.092

< .031

.006< .003

< .031.006

< .031.031

.092

.552

.092< .031

*** Sample was titrated with .1 N HCl. All other alkalinities titrated at the District laboratory were titrated with.16 N H2S04which may induce a 2 percent to 5 percent error in the alkalinity value,

f Collector was removed from 12/06/85 to 12/24/85 because of hunting season. ft No sample analyzed due to contamination, fft No sample analyzed. } The lid was removed from the wet bucket from 9/26/85 to 10/1/85.

91

Page 98: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 18.--Chemical analyses of throughfall in HcDonalds Branch basin. September 23. 1985 through March 25. 1986

[All cations, anions, trace metals, and silica were measured as dissolved constituents; throughfall was collected weekly and composited into monthly samples; /iS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; meq/L. milliequwalents per liter; mg/L, milligrams per liter; /*g/L, micrograms per liter; lab, laboratory; -- indicates missing data; < indicates less than]

Site name

TF-1CTF-1CTF-1CTF-1CTF-1CTF-1CTF-1CTF-1C

TF-3HTF-3HTF-3HTF-3HTF-3HTF-3HTF-3H

TF-2PBTF-2PBTF-2PBTF-2PBTF-2PBTF-2PB

TF-4PBJTF-4PBJTF-4PBJTF-4PBJTF-4PBJTF-4PBJTF-4PBJ

Sample-col lection dates

09/23/1985-10/01/198510/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/17/198512/03/1985-12/10/1985***12/17/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986-03/25/1986

09/23/1985-10/01/198510/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/17/198512/17/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986-03/25/1986

10/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/17/198512/17/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986-03/25/1986

10/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/17/198512/03/1985-12/10/1985***12/17/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986-03/25/1986

pH (units)

District Central lab lab

4.2*4.13.8*3.93.7...3.83.65.4*5.14.8*4.5...4.5

4.64.1*4.1...4.23.9

4.54.4*4.34.1...4.24.2

4.74.43.93.83.73.53.94.7

6.65.75.84.44.65.6

4.64.54.04.14.54.1

5.15.14.24.34.44.74.3

Specific conductance

(^S/cm) District Central

lab lab

...6012589175275120160

18203930...27

259371645283

30524577745063

424211810615823195140

212040323016...

198790633667

20484959613351

Dissolved organic carbon (mg/L)

16161912...168.112

4.4106.82.86.82.1

6.7117.26.74.37.6

129.76.8

11135.67.6

Alkalinity (meq/L) District

lab

...

...

...-0.15**......

- .18**...

...

...

...- .04**...

- .02**

...- .07- .10**- .10- .07**...

...- .04- .06**............

92

Page 99: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 18.--Chemical analyses of throuahfall in HcDonalds Branch basin. September 23. 1985 through March 25. 1986- Continued

Sitenamer

TF-1CTF-1CTF-1CTF-1CTF-1CTF-1CTF-1CTF-1CTF-3HTF-3HTF-3HTF-3HTF-3HTF-3HTF-3H

TF-2PBTF-2PBTF-2PBTF-2PBTF-2PBTF-2PB

TF-4PBJTF-4PBJTF-4PBJTF-4PBJTF-4PBJTF-4PBJTF-4PBJ

Sample-collectiondates

09/23/1985-10/01/198510/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/17/198512/03/1985-12/10/198512/17/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986-03/25/198609/23/1985-10/01/198510/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/17/198512/17/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986-03/25/1986

10/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/17/198512/17/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986-03/25/1986

10/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/17/198512/03/1985-12/10/198512/17/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986-03/25/1986

Cal­ cium<mg/L)

2.41.33.32.14.59.22.33.31.01.31.4.70

1.3.38

...

1.02.01.21.5.76

1.2

1.01.3.80

1.12.2.82

1.0

Mag­ nesium<mg/L)

0.30.22.80.50

1.01.82.2.65.15.30.50.10.30.17

...

.201.1.50.48.29.42

.24

.70

.40

.50

.82

.32

.39

So­ dium<mg/L)

1.11.04.21.53.43.11.91.71.3.3

2.9.9.6.8

...

1.07.53.11.31.51.5

1.03.81.82.51.41.51.1

Potas­ sium(mg/L)

1.0.80

1.71.3...2.7....90

1.11.42.1.90

1.0.31

...

.90

.90

.51

.38

.19

.28

.701.6.90

...1.5.37.51

Ammo­ nium(mg/L)

0.18.22.31.10

....70.10.194.04.03.08.12.21.12

.03

.14

.12

.35

.09

.28

.01

.04

.06

.53

.09

.33

Alumi­ num(/ig/L)

52318453120390100150191518184711

...

217957965498

305839741405778

Iron(/ig/L)

47386952621604691101496

257

...

102319401739

1028918391325

Manga­ nese

(/ig/L)

3524785412021047649

232813398

...

567747492238

40110831101805868

Lead(/ig/L)

6384.6...

266.2

11< 1

222.04.82.0...

223.87.02.65.2

322.24.06.82.23.6

93

Page 100: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 18.- l analyses of throuahfall in HcDonalds Branch basin. September 23. 1985 through March 25. nued

1986

Site name

TF-1CTF-1CTF-1CTF-1CTF-1CTF-1CTF-1CTF-1C

TF-3HTF-3H7F-3HTF-3HTF-3HTF-3HTF-3H

TF-2PBTF-2PBTF-2PBTF-2PBTF-2PBTF-2PB

TF-4PBJTF-4PBJTF-4PBJTF-4PBJTF-4PBJTF-4PBJTF-4PBJ

Sample- col lection dates

09/23/1985-10/01/198510/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/17/198512/03/1985-12/10/198512/17/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986-03/25/1986

09/23/1985-10/01/198510/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/17/198512/17/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986-03/25/1986f

10/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/17/198512/17/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986-03/25/1986

10/01/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/19/198511/19/1985-12/17/198512/03/1985-12/10/198512/17/1985-01/21/198601/21/1986-02/19/198602/19/1986-03/25/1986

Sulfate (mg/L)

4.95.2

149.815169.6

14

1.22.84.03.12.82.0...

3.06.25.65.33.56.4

3.14.54.48.97.94.06.2

Chloride (mg/L)

2.51.49.23.17.65.53.54.0

2.51.05.41.81.51.4...

.9105.91.92.42.5

.96.83.62.12.32.62.1

Fluoride (mg/L)

0.12.10

< .1.11...

< .1.16.10

.03

.06

.06

.04

.09

.04

.05

.10

.08

.11

.08

.14

.07

.08

.06

.10

.16

.09

.12

Bromide (mg/L)

0.02.02.047.03

< .010< .010

.06< .010

.01

.02

.03

.02

.01

.03...

.01

.05

.03

.02

.04

.06

.02

.03

.03

.02

.02

.03

.03

Nitrate (mg/L)

4.03.48.05.313308.412

.441.21.52.04.21.7...

1.84.94.48.03.96.2

1.41.42.06.27.52.73.9

Phosphate (mg/L)

< 0.03< .03< .03

.06

.03

.03< .03< .03

< .03< .03< .03

.09

.12< .03

...

< .03.03.12.12

< .03< .03

< .03< .03

.06

.18

.12

.06

.34

Silica (mg/L)

0.34.20.20.10.20.43.11

...

.12

.30

.07

.05

.17

.02...

.14

.09

.07

.11

.01

.08

.10

.05

.09

.14

.1

.03

.07

* Measurements of pH and specific conductance at the District lab were made on unfiltered samples.

** Sample titrated with .1 N HCL. All other alkalinities titrated at the District laboratory were titrated with .16 N H2SG1 which may induce a 2 percent to 5 percent error in the alkalinity value.

*** Sample not included in composited sample shown directly above, because contamination of sample suspected at time of sampling.

f Sample was contaminated and not analyzed.

94

Page 101: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 19.--Chemical analyses of soil water in HcDonalds Branch basin. January 10. 1985 through March 21. 1986

[All cations, anions, and trace metals were measured as dissolved constituents: where more than one site name is listed, samples were composited; pS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; meo/L, mi 11{equivalents per liter; mg/L, milligrams per liter; lab, laboratory; - indicates missing data; < indicates less than]

Site name

PIT-1-LIO

PIT-1-LIAPIT-1-LIAPIT-1-LIAPIT-1-LIAPIT-1-LIA

PIT-2-LIO

PIT-1, 2-LIO

PIT-3-LaO

PIT-3-LaBPIT-3-LaBPIT-3-LaBPIT-3-LaBPIT-3-LaB

PIT-4-LuOPIT-4-LuO

PIT-4-LuAPIT-4-LuAPIT-4-LuA

PIT-5-LtOPIT-5-LtOPIT-5-LtO

PIT-5-LtAPIT-5-LtAPIT-5-LtAPIT-5-LtAPIT-5-LtA

PIT-5-LtB

PIT-6-LuOPIT-6-LuOPIT-6-LuOPIT-6-LuOPIT-6-LuO

PIT-6-LuBPIT-6-LuB

PIT-7-AuO

PIT-7-AuA

PIT-7-AuB

PIT-8-AuO

Specific pH conductance

(units) (fiS/cm) Sample-collection District Central District Central

dates lab lab lab lab

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

05/09/1985 - 06/06/198510/01/1985-10/24/198510/24/1985-11/21/198511/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

05/02/1985-05/09/1985

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/10/1985-02/11/198503/29/1985-05/06/198510/24/1985-11/21/198511/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

11/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

09/30/1985-10/25/198511/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

10/29/1985-11/21/198511/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

05/02/1985-05/06/198509/30/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/21/198511/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/10/1985-02/11/198505/02/1985-05/06/198509/30/1985-10/29/198511/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

11/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

...

3.8...3.84.14.2

...

3.9

4.1

4.6......4.64.9

3,83.8

3.94.04.1

...4.04.1

...4.04.04.04.2

...

...4.03.83.83.9

4.44.6

3.8

3.8

...

4.2

3.9

3.73.93.84.34.3

3.8

3.7

4.2

...4.74.95.44.9

3.83.9

4.04.24.2

4.04.24.2

4.24.14.14.24.4

4.9

...3.83.83.94.1

4.74.7

3.8

3.7

4.4

4.3

...

145...1204653

...

106

63

...

...

...3341

9093

645169

...5253

...55675645

...

...120938879

4843

97

106

...

76

70

131691003638

107

102

52

...33372539

7878

614147

594142

5456594536

29

781081047958

4637

86

92

52

65

Alkalinity Alkalinity as CaCOs <meq/L) <mg/L)

District Central lab lab

...

... ...

... ...

... <^-0.08 <1

<1

...

...

...

... ...

... ...

... ...

... ...<1

<1- .15* <1

<1 .10 <1- .10* <1

... ...

... <i .10*

... ...

... <1

... < )- .10 <1- .06* <1

...

... ...

... ...

... <i

... ...- .12* <1

» . . ...

...

- .17* <1

...

...

- .03* <1

Dissolved organic carbon <mg/L)

18

9.519181210

28

30

22

2.7116.14.54.8

2325

171611

...1816

1021202113

2.2

. .

18312019

1.92.8

45

28

8.4

18

95

Page 102: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 19.--Chemical analyses of soil water in HcDonalds Branch basin. January 10. 1985 through March 21. 1986--Continued

Sitename

PIT-1-LIO

PIT-1-LIAPIT-1-LIAPIT-1-LIAPIT-1-LIAPIT-1-LIA

PIT-2-LIO

PIT-1, 2-LIO

PIT-3-LaO

PIT-3-LaBPIT-3-LaBPIT-3-LaBPIT-3-LaBPIT-3-LaB

PIT-4-LuOPIT-4-LuO

PIT-4-LuAPIT-4-LuAPIT-4-LuA

PIT-5-LtOPIT-5-LtOPIT-5-LtO

PIT-5-LtAPIT-5-LtAPIT-5-LtAPIT-5-LtAPIT-5-LtA

PIT-5-LtB

PIT-6-LuOPIT-6-LuOPIT-6-LuOPIT-6-LuOPIT-6-LuO

PIT-6-LuBPIT-6-LuB

PIT-7-AuO

PIT-7-AuA

PIT-7-AUB

PIT-8-AuO

Sample-collectiondates

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

05/09/1985-06/06/198510/01/1985-10/24/198510/24/1985-11/21/198511/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

05/02/1985-05/09/1985

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/10/1985-02/11/198503/29/1985-05/06/198510/24/1985-11/21/198511/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

11/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

09/30/1 985 - 1 0/25/1 98511/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

10/29/1985-11/21/198511/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

05/02/1985-05/06/198509/30/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/21/198511/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/10/1985-02/11/198505/02/1985-05/06/198509/30/1985 - 1 0/29/198511/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

11/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

Cal­cium(mg/L)

0.60

1.1.50.61.20.30

1.8

.93

1.2

...1.01.11.21.9

.20

.60

.30

.20

.20

.30

.43

.20

.451.0.34.40.40

.30

.50

.701.0.70.60

.50

.40

.20

.30

.50

1.5

Mag­nesium(mg/L)

0.20

.40

.10

.28

.09

.10

.50

.38

.50

...

.31

.50

.40

.60

.10

.30

.22

.10

.20

.10

.18

.20

.34

.50

.31

.30

.30

.30

.30

.501.0.60.50

.40

.40

.50

.20

.20

.60

So­dium(mg/L)

1.2

3.61.83.01.41.0

2.6

2.1

1.3

...1.11.81.51.6

1.42.6

1.11.41.3

1.91.41.3

1.61.02.12.01.1

1.6

2.33.42.01.81.2

1.31.3

1.3

1.1

1.3

2.5

Potas­sium(mg/L)

1.3

...

...1.1.53.49

1.0

...

.2

.27

...

...

...

.31

.23

.33

.81.0.7....43.40

...

.26

.12

.21

.27

.20

.67

1.5....48

...

.3

1.1

.2

.3

.8

Ammo­nium(mg/L)

...

...

...0.017....028

...

...

.148

...

...

...

.009

.026

.019

.082

.024

.015

.050

...

.023

...

.021

.014

.014

.094

...

...

...

.019

.058

.167

.006

.027

.103

...

...

.107

Alumi­num(Mg/D

330

< 10320320220230

1,500

350

460

390390730680800...

430

310370320

430400470

420900790

1,100710

670

780760830610570

7801,200

440

830

2,500

2,100

Iron(Mg/D

130

5315069150140

210

130

310

...6

< 3< 38

180170

140180120

140160190

130210180350200

8

160130210220150

< 3< 3

260

240

17

190

Manga­nese(Mg/D

26

19712410

35

29

230

...78756290

1011

1056

12915

4568444237

50

1736796053

7567

2

8

13

49

Lead(Mg/D

...

...

...3

< .5< .5

...

...

...

...

...

...< .5

1.0

< 1< .5

1.8.7

....6...

...< 1

2.6

1.6...

...

...22.22.3......

...

...

...

1.9

96

Page 103: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 19.--Chemical analyses of soil water in HcDonalds Branch basin. January 10. 1985 through March 21. 1986- Continued

Site name

PIT-1-LIO

PIT-1-LIAPIT-1-LIAPIT-1-LIAPIT-1-LIAPIT-1-LIA

PIT-2-LIO

PIT-1, 2-LIO

PIT-3-LaO

PIT-3-LaBPIT-3-LaBPIT-3-LaBPIT-3-LaBPIT-3-LaB

PIT-4-LuOPIT-4-LuO

PIT-4-LuAPIT-4-LuAPIT-4-LuA

PIT-5-LtOPIT-5-LtOPIT-5-LtO

PIT-5-LtAPIT-5-LtAPIT-5-LtAPIT-5-LtAPIT-5-LtA

PIT-5-LtB

PIT-6-LuOPIT-6-LuOPIT-6-LuOPIT-6-LuOPIT-6-LuO

PIT-6-LuBPIT-6-LuB

PIT-7-AuO

PIT-7-AuA

PIT-7-AuB

PIT-8-AuO

Sample- col lection dates

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

05/09/1985-06/06/198510/01/1985-10/24/198510/24/1985-11/21/198511/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

05/02/1985-05/09/1985

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/10/1985-02/11/198503/29/1985-05/06/198510/24/1985-11/21/198511/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

11/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

09/30/1985-10/25/198511/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

10/29/1985-11/21/198511/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

05/02/1985-05/06/198509/30/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/21/198511/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/10/1985-02/11/198505/02/1985-05/06/198509/30/1985-10/29/198511/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

11/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

Sulfate (mg/L)

5.1

126.08.24.04.2

13

13

5.1...5.45.74.36.2

6.46.3

4.76.44.8

4.93.74.0

5.85.75.14.64.3

5.5...16208.56.5

7.78.4

4.9

8.4

8.0

12

Chloride (mg/L)

3.6

113.17.91.71.7

9.8

4.4

3.6...2.13.62.14.3

4.44.5

3.91.92.6

3.81.91.6

2.63.25.82.32.3

3.1...6.94.94.53.4

5.22.8

3.0

3.6

2.5

3.9

Fluoride (mg/L)

0.03

< .1.03.10.03.04

.1

< .1

.05....04.05.03.03

.05

.07

.04

.03

.03

.04

.03

.03

.05

.05

.05

.07

.04

.03...

< .1< .1

.05

.03

.03

.03

.06

.05

.02

.02

Bromide (mg/L)

0.03

.16

.02

.03

.02

.02

.015

< .010

.02....02.01.01.03

.02

.03

.01< .010

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.01

.03

.02

.02

.02...

< .010< .010

.02

.03

.02

.02

.09

.05

< .01

.02

Nitrate (mg/L)

3.54

3.541.771.28.09.58

< .44

4.07

.18...2.082.461.461.59

.13

.66

< .04.04

1.02

.39

.181.11

3.15< .04

.13

.04

.71

.09...2.04

< .44.09.35

.27

.13

< .04

.09

5.76

.53

Phosphate (mg/L)

0.12...

< .03< .03< .03< .03

...

...

< .03...

< .03< .03< .03< .03

< .03< .03

< .03< .03< .03

< .03< .03< .03

< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03

< .03......

< .03< .03< .03

< .03< .03

.12

< .03

< .03

< .03

Silica (mg/L)

1.1

.602.44.0.70.80

5.7

.77

1.4...1.2.80

1.21.3

.601.0

1.01.1.90

.60

.66

.80

1.21.31.0.80.50

1.7

3.82.03.12.4.90

1.81.8

2.2

2.2

2.4

2.4

97

Page 104: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 19.--Chemical analyses of soil water in McDonalds Branch basin. January 10^ 1985 through March 21. 1986- Cont 1 nued

Sitename

PIT-8-AuA

PIT-8-AuBPIT-8-AuBPIT-8-AuB

PIT-9-AuOPIT-9-AuOPIT-9-AuOPIT-9-AuOPIT-9-AuOPIT-9-AuOPIT-9-AuO

PIT-9-AuAPIT-9-AuAPIT-9-AuAPIT-9-AuA

PIT-9-AuBPIT-9-AuBPIT-9-AuBPIT-9-AuBPIT-9-AuBPIT-9-AuB

PIT-7,9-AuO

PIT-8, 9-AuO

PIT-8,9-AuAPIT-8, 9-AuAPIT-8, 9-AuAPIT-8, 9-AuA

PIT-8, 9-AuBPIT-8, 9-AuB

PIT-7,8, 9-AuBPIT-7,8, 9-AuBPIT-7,8, 9-AuBPIT-7,8, 9-AuB

PIT-10-EvO/APIT-10-EvO/APIT-10-EvO/APIT-10-EvO/A

PIT-11-EvO/APIT-11-EvO/APIT-11-EvO/A

PIT-10, 11-EvO/APIT-10, 11-EvO/A

PIT-12-EvO/A

PHSpecific Alkalinity conductance Alkalinity as CaCOs

(units) (AtS/cm) (meq/L) (mg/L) Sample- co I lection District Central District Central District Central

dates

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

11/21/1985-12/20/198512/20/1985-01/23/198601/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/10/1985-02/07/198502/07/1985-03/04/198503/28/1985-05/01/198505/01/1985-05/07/198511/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/198602/25/1986-03/21/1986

05/01/1985-05/07/198511/21/1985-12/20/198501/23/1986-02/25/198602/25/1986-03/21/1986

05/01/1985-05/07/198512/20/1985***12/20/1 985 f12/20/1985-01/23/198601/23/1985-02/25/198602/25/1986-03/21/1986

08/29/1985-09/30/1985

03/04/1985-03/28/1985

01/10/1985-02/07/198502/07/1985-03/04/198503/04/1985-03/28/198503/28/1985-05/01/1985

01/10/1985-02/07/198503/04/1985-03/28/1985

02/07/1985-03/04/198503/28/1985-05/01/198505/07/1985-06/07/198506/07/1985-07/02/1985

09/30/1985-10/29/198510/29/1985-11/21/198511/21/1985-12/23/198501/23/1985-02/25/1986

10/29/1985-11/21/198511/21/1985-12/23/198501/23/1986-02/25/1986

08/02/1985-08/29/198508/29/1985-10/01/1985

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

lab

...

4.2...4.5

3.6......4.0**...4.34.2

...4.13.83.9

...3.63.53.53.63.6

3.5

4.0

3.6...3.9...

3.74.0

...3.94.13.6

...4.4...4.6

...

...4.4

4.74.3

4.3

lab

3.7

4.44.34.6

...3.73.73.94.04.44.3

3.54.23.84.0

3.53.63.53.53.63.6

3.7

3.8

3.74.03.83.6

4.03.9

3.93.83.83.5

4.54.85.14.9

4.34.64.8

5.74.5

4.5

lab

...

80...56

...

...

...

...

...7166

...7810785

...165180"159144155

175

100

...

...140...

...140

...106107154

...40...36

...

...54

4869

51

lab lab lab

123

80 -0.01* <158 - - - <144 + .03 <1

... ... ...109 - <1113 --- <11027063 + .01* <161 - - - <3

148 -- <175 - - - <1100 - .22* <175 - - - <3

160 --- <1147 --- <1180158 -- <1133 --- <1137

135 --- <1

104

117 --- <185 --- <193 --- <1144 --- <1

89 - - - <1101

77 --- <1105 --- <199 - .19 <1164 --- <1

3434 --- <126 --- <131 --- <1

876450

4260 --- <1

51

Dissolvedorganic carbon(mg/L)

22

8.01920

29333632456244

36525140

324640414132

67

32

29192432

1723

15192135

15121111

8.89.49.4

1414

13

98

Page 105: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 19.--Chemical analyses of soil water in HcDonalds Branch basin. January 10. 1985 through March 21. 1986- Continued

Cal- Site Sample-collection cium name dates (mg/L)

PIT-8-AuA 01/23/1986-02/25/1986 1.1

PIT-8-AuB 11/21/1985-12/20/1985 2.6PIT-8-AuB 12/20/1985-01/23/1986 1.5PIT-8-AuB 01/23/1986-02/25/1986 1.2

PIT-9-AuO 01/10/1985-02/07/1985 1.6PIT-9-AuO 02/07/1985-03/04/1985 1.2PIT-9-AuO 03/28/1985-05/01/1985 1.3PIT-9-AuO 05/01/1985-05/07/1985 2.0PIT-9-AuO 11/21/1985-12/20/1985 2.0PIT-9-AuO 01/23/1986-02/25/1986 2.0PIT-9-AuO 02/25/1986-03/21/1986 1.8

PIT-9-AuA 05/01/1985-05/07/1985 1.1PIT-9-AuA 11/21/1985-12/20/1985 2.4PIT-9-AuA 01/23/1986-02/25/1986 1.1PIT-9-AuA 02/25/1986-03/21/1986 1.0

PIT-9-AuB 05/01/1985-05/07/1985 1.9PIT-9-AuB 12/20/1985*** 1.6PIT-9-AuB 12/20/1985f 1.4PIT-9-AuB 12/20/1985-01/23/1986 1.6PIT-9-AuB 01/23/1985-02/25/1986 1.4PIT-9-AuB 02/25/1986-03/21/1986 1.1

PIT-7,9-AuO 08/29/1985-09/30/1985 .70

PIT-8, 9-AuO 03/04/1985-03/28/1985 1.7

PIT-8,9-AuA 01/10/1985-02/07/1985 .80PIT-8,9-AuA 02/07/1985-03/04/1985 .40PIT-8,9-AuA 03/04/1985-03/28/1985 .70PIT-8,9-AuA 03/28/1985-05/01/1985 .98

PIT-8,9-AuB 01/10/1985-02/07/1985 1.1PIT-8.9-AUB 03/04/1985-03/28/1985 1.3

PIT-7,8,9-AuB 02/07/1985-03/04/1985 .90PIT-7,8,9-AuB 03/28/1985-05/01/1985 1.3PIT-7,8,9-AuB 05/07/1985-06/07/1985 1.0PIT-7,8,9-AuB 06/07/1985-07/02/1985 1.7

PIT-10-EvO/A 09/30/1985-10/29/1985 1.0PIT-10-EvO/A 10/29/1985-11/21/1985 1.0PIT-10-EvO/A 11/21/1985-12/23/1985 .70PIT-10-EvO/A 01/23/1985-02/25/1986 1.1

PIT-11-EvO/A 10/29/1985-11/21/1985 3.4PIT-11-EvO/A 11/21/1985-12/23/1985 2.6PIT-11-EvO/A 01/23/1986-02/25/1986 1.6

PIT-10,11-EvO/A 08/02/1985-08/29/1985 1.4

PIT-10, 11-EvO/A 08/29/1985-10/01/1985 2.0

PIT-12-EvO/A 01/23/1986-02/25/1986 .60

Mag­ nesium <mg/L>

0.70

1.5.83.60

1.2.80.92.95

1.2.90.87

1.01.4.90.77

.50

.60

.50

.57

.60

.50

.78

.90

.70

.40

.601.0

.40

.40

.40

.43

.40

.60

1.01.0.40.60

1.31.0.60

.56

1.0

.80

So­ dium <mg/L)

2.6

1.21.71.7

3.12.22.42.62.43.93.2

2.42.22.52.8

2.93.33.23.43.32.9

1.8

2.4

2.44.21.62.4

2.42.3

1.92.42.03.1

.51.31.11.3

2.01.81.2

1.1

1.2

2.3

Potas­ sium <mg/L)

2.1

1.51.61.2

2.81.2.46......

1.71.3

.354.0.70.90

.11

.29

.15

.27

.07

2.3

.87

.571.5.46.39

.12

.14

.13

.10

.13

.10

...1.31.1.8

...

...2.4

...

3.5

.2

Ammo­ nium <mg/L>

...

.010

.115

.129

...

.053

.030

...

.045

.108

.085

.053

.027

.050

.082

.044

.030

.028

.033

.041

.015

.100

.042

.019

.026

.030

.035

.018

.030

.018

.023

.076

.078

.067

.015

.013

.042

.018

...

1.42

.427

...

Alumi­ num

1,500

2,4002,1002,100

2,5002,5002,2002,5002,7003,2003,400

1,1003,6001,8002,900

1,5002,5001,8001,9001,8001,500

1,600

2,700

1,1001,1001,2001,100

1,5001,700

1,8001,8001,5001,300

740770770830

470470400

560

590

1,400

Iron

190

48440650

950650

1,100370440

1,5001,200

250350450820

911403451

25046

410

860

160150180210

4548

4348150260

180180270250

140220240

260

200

120

Manga­ nese

30

1308161

955

23446050

4742023

24

< 1252

3

13

3754

35

855

< 1

78956181

220170110

140

140

56

Lead

...

1.22.82.0

2018

< 1......

< .55

63.0

< .53.0

133.0

< .5...1.0

9

11

65

217

26

10777. . .

21

...

...

...

...

2...

99

Page 106: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 19.--Chemical analyses of soil water in HcDonalds Branch basin. Continued

January 10. 1985 through March 21. 1986-

Site name

Sample-collection dates

Sulfate (mg/L)

Chloride (mg/L)

Fluoride (mg/L)

Bromide (mg/L)

Nitrate (mg/L)

Phosphate (mg/L)

Silica (mg/L)

PIT-8-AuA 01/23/1986-02/25/1986 17

PIT-8-AuB PIT-8-AuB PIT-8-AuB

PIT-9-AuO PIT-9-AuO PIT-9-AuO PIT-9-AuO PIT-9-AuO PIT-9-AuO PIT-9-AuO

PIT-9-AuA PIT-9-AuA PIT-9-AuA PIT-9-AuA

PIT-9-AuB PIT-9-AuB PIT-9-AuB PIT-9-AuB PIT-9-AuB PIT-9-AuB

11/21/1985-12/20/1985 12/20/1985-01/23/1986 01/23/1986-02/25/1986

01/10/1985- 02/07/1985- 03/28/1985- 05/01/1985- 11/21/1985- 01/23/1986- 02/25/1986-

02/07/1985 03/04/1985 05/01/1985 05/07/1985 12/20/1985 02/25/1986 03/21/1986

05/01/1985-05/07/1985 11/21/1985-12/20/1985 01/23/1986-02/25/1986 02/25/1986-03/21/1986

05/01/1985-05/07/198512/20/1985***12/20/1985f12/20/1985-01/23/198601/23/1985-02/25/198602/25/1986-03/21/1986

PIT-7.9-AUO 08/29/1985-09/30/1985

PIT-8,9-AuO 03/04/1985-03/28/1985

PIT-8,9-AuA PIT-8,9-AuA PIT-8,9-AuA PIT-8,9-AuA

PIT-8,9-AuB PIT-8,9-AuB

01/10/1985-02/07/1985 02/07/1985-03/04/1985 03/04/1985-03/28/1985 03/28/1985-05/01/1985

01/10/1985-02/07/1985 03/04/1985-03/28/1985

PIT-7,8.9-AUB02/07/1985-03/04/1985 PIT-7,8,9-AUB03/28/1985-05/01/1985 PIT-7,8,9-AUB05/07/1985-06/07/1985 PIT-7,8,9-AUB06/07/1985-07/02/1985

PIT-10-EvO/A 09/30/1985-10/29/1985 PIT-10-EvO/A 10/29/1985-11/21/1985 PIT-10-EvO/A 11/21/1985-12/23/1985 PIT-10-EvO/A 01/23/1985-02/25/1986

PIT-11-EvO/A 10/29/1985-11/21/1985 PIT-11-EvO/A 11/21/1985-12/23/1985 PIT-11-EvO/A 01/23/1986-02/25/1986

118.57.3

2834289.07.58.4

3110109.2

303125252720

25

28

138.5

1131

1223

12241229

4.8 4.8 4.6 3.0

179.610

4.7

2.93.43.5

5.25.3 6.0 3.33.83.9

5.0 3.7 3.4 3.7

6.1 8.0 7.9 7.3 6.7 6.4

9.3

6.1

3.7 6.4 3.55.0

4.2 4.2

3.64.2 4.0 7.4

1.5 3.71.4 3.0

9.4 5.8 3.1

0.1

.05

.04

.02

< .1< .1< .1

.04

.08

.06

.1

.03

.11

.06

.2

.1

.1

.1

.1

< .1

< .1

.08

.06

.06 < .1

.06

.1

.05 < .1

.06

.1

.05

.03

.02

.02

< .1 .03 .03

0.042

.04

.02

.031

.16

.099 < .010

.01

.05

.04

.030 < .01

.05

.041

< .010 .11

.070

.095

.08

< .025

< .010

.02

.02

.02 < .010

.01 < .010

.02< .010

.01

.036

.01

.01

.01

.03

< .010 .02 .03

11.1

11.53.06.67

.44

.44

.44

.44

.09

.18

< .441.02.18.09

< .44< .44< .44< .44< .44< .44

< .44

< .44

.18

.89

.04< .44

.18 < .44

.49

.44

.04

.44

.09

.04

.04

.09

.441.281.46

< .03< .03< .03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.15

.06

.03

.03

.06

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.06

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

2.7

4.4 2.9 2.5

7.8 5.2 4.3 5.1 4.2 3.5 2.9

4.7 5.0 3.3 2.8

4.7 4.6 4.4 4.9 4.03.5

3.6

4.6

5.9 3.33.7 5.0

3.1 4.2

3.7 4.0 3.6 4.2

2.4 3.0

7.0 5.2 2.7

PIT-10.11-EvO/A

PIT-10,11-EvO/A

PIT-12-EvO/A

08/02/1985-08/29/1985

08/29/1985-10/01/1985

01/23/1986-02/25/1986

8

9

9

.0

.7

.5

2

4

4

.9

.9

.1

.05

.05

.05

.02

.03

.04

.27

.35

.04

.25

.09

< .03

4

6

2

.8

.0

.8

* Samples titrated with .1 N HCL. All other alkalinities titrated at the District laboratory were titrated with .16 N H2S04which may induce a 2 percent to 5 percent error in the alkalinity value.

** Measurements of pH and specific conductance at the District Lab were made on unfiltered samples.

*** Sample collected at 12:20 p.m..

f Sample collected at 12:35 p.m..

100

Page 107: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 20.--Chemical analyses of surface water in McDonalds Branch basin. January 24. 1985 through March 21. 1986

[All cations, am'ons, trace metals, and silica were measured as dissolved constituents;*C, degrees Celsius; ^S/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; meq/L, milliequivalents per liter;mg/L, milligrams per liter; ^g/L, micrograms per liter; lab, laboratory; --- indicates missing data;indicates less than]

Site name or number

S-s-s-s-s-s-s-s-s-s-s-

S-2S-2S-2S-2S-2S-2S-2S-2S-2S-2S-2

S-3S-3S-3

S-4

S-5S-5S-5S-5S-5

S-6

S-7S-7S-7

S-8S-8S-8S-8S-8S-8

Sample- collection

date

01/24/198502/25/198503/26/198504/25/198505/28/198506/24/198509/30/198511/18/198512/16/198501/21/198602/19/1986

01/24/198502/25/198503/26/198504/25/198505/28/198506/24/198507/22/198509/30/198510/21/198511/18/198501/21/1986

01/25/198502/25/198503/26/1985

02/26/1985

02/26/198503/27/198509/30/198512/16/198502/19/1986

02/26/1985

02/26/198503/27/198502/19/1986

01/25/198502/27/198503/27/198504/26/198505/28/198506/24/1985

Temper­

ature CO

1.04.57.012.517.017.515.510.01.51.02.0

2.04.06.012.020.021.525.014.513.09.01.0

1.54.57.0

4.0

11.011.022.53.0.5

8.5

1.59.0.5

6.55.08.011.014.013.5

pH (units)

field lab

3.73.83.74.04.24.03.23.53.63.23.7

3.73.73.73.93.93.94.03.8...

3.53.7

3.73.83.7

3.8

4.14.03.53.53.7

4.1

4.04.33.7

3.93.93.94.33.94.3

3.93.84.14.14.14.13.23.63.553.663.72

3.93.83.94.04.14.04.24.13.63.53.63

3.93.83.9

4.0

4.24.23.93.513.76

4.2

4.04.23.72

4.43.94.14.64.04.6

Specific conductance

field lab

115108114706091

440190170150102

1121021167771835895

201233165

109102114

118

8993160285106

75

8879134

568978397844

9094106626159

432164146129112

82931066762625678196196137

8092106

100

7389140219107

71

7980124

337969317033

Alkalinity Alkalinity Dissolved (meq/L) as CaCOs oxygen District (mg/L) (mg/L) lab Central lab

<,

4.8 -- <15.7 --- <1.8 - <1.7.5 <1

2.7 --- <12.5 --- <17.9 - .25 * < .506.2 --- < .5010.6 - .20 * < .50

<,

4.7 <14.3 - - <11.3 --- <12.0 - .142.3 - <12.1 <16.9 -- <1

<11.6 --- <16.8 .50

<!<1

6.9 <1

6.5 --- <1

5.2 --- <19.1 --- <19.3 -- <115.3 - .32 * < .5012.1 - .18 * < .50

4.9 - <1

7.5 --- <1<1

10.5 - .19 * < .50

<!

5.8 <18.0 --- <1.7 - <1.5 - .31 <1

1.1 -- <1

Dissolved organic carbon (mg/L)

5.68.89.8

2037301718221926

7.68.19.4162730...

8.9221920

6.68.59.2

6.3

119.7101619

10

5.72514

2.94.73.64.74.53.8

101

Page 108: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 20.--Chemical analyses of surface water in McDonalds Branch basin. January 24. 1985 through March 21. 1986- Continued

Site name or number

S-1S-1S-1S-1S-1S-1S-1S-1S-1S-1S-1

S-2S-2S-2S-2S-2S-2S-2S-2S-2S-2S-2

S-3S-3S-3

S-4

S-5S-5S-5S-5S-5

S-6

S-7S-7S-7

S-8S-8S-8S-8S-8S-8

Sample-

collection date

01/24/198502/25/198503/26/198504/25/198505/28/198506/24/198509/30/198511/18/198612/16/198501/21/198602/19/1986

01/24/198502/25/198503/26/198504/25/198505/28/198506/24/198507/22/198509/30/198510/21/198511/18/198501/21/1986

01/25/198502/25/198503/26/1985

02/26/1985

02/26/198503/27/198509/30/198512/16/198502/19/1986

02/26/1985

02/26/198503/27/198502/19/1986

01/25/198502/27/198503/27/198504/26/198505/28/198506/24/1985

Calcium Magnesium (mg/L) (mg/L)

0.80.80.94.30.30.30

5.21.11.1.90.70

.70

.70

.93

.40

.30

.30

.662.01.61.7.90

.70

.70

.71

.90

.60

.703.03.01.0

.60

1.11.21.6

.30

.70< .02

.20

.70

.39

0.50.50.53.20.20.10

3.0.70.70.50.40

.50

.50

.60

.20

.10

.10

.271.0.86.90.50

.50

.50

.59

.70

.40

.452.01.8.50

.40

.901.01.0

.30

.60

.59

.30

.50

.21

Sodium (mg/L)

2.52.32.42.62.32.25.03.23.52.92.8

2.52.32.52.52.22.21.41.43.33.53.0

2.42.32.5

2.8

2.52.93.03.92.7

2.2

2.53.02.8

1.92.62.41.92.61.9

Potassium Ammonium (mg/L) (mg/L)

0.18.22.06.18.39.28.28.30.10 0.023.11 .023.11 .022

.11

.16

.06

.17

.48

.491.21.0.40.55.08 .015

.09

.14

.05

.63

.66

.65

.24

.33 .18

.18 .041

.64

.901.0.31 .089

.21

.47

.36

.25

.34

.33

Aluminum

620630790550880840

10,0001,5001,8001,5001,300

580600770440700740450950

1,5002,0001,500

580610740

680

520620740

4,1001,100

390

4001,0001,300

1002502209018050

I ron Manganese (mg/L) (/ig/L)

420580370

3,4004,7003,400

370670500360600

350380360

2,6003,5003,100

640750

8,1002,100320

490430360

270

1,600550200330470

650

6006,600

290

140190160260420460

2123201047

9628281818

19232511691936443720

1624<1

39

18221408633

21

544355

11353110289

Lead

<158

<1<1

5852.42.42.6

<1

25

<1

4732342.0

128

<1

<1

1026.83.4

<1

<1

63.0

1<1

2<1

15

102

Page 109: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 20.--Chemical analyses of surface water in HcDonalds Branch basin, January 24. 1985 through March 21. 1986- Cont i nued

Site name or number

S-1S-1S-1S-1S-1S-1S-1S-1S-1S-1S-1

S-2S-2S-2S-2S-2S-2S-2S-2S-2S-2S-2

S-3S-3S-3

S-4

S-5S-5S-5S-5S-5

S-6

S-7S-7S-7

S-8S-8S-8S-8S-8S-8

Sample-

collection date

01/24/198502/25/198503/26/198504/25/198505/28/198506/24/198509/30/198511/18/198512/16/198501/21/198602/19/1986

01/24/198502/25/198503/26/198504/25/198505/28/198506/24/198507/22/198509/30/198510/21/198511/18/198501/21/1986

01/25/198502/25/198503/26/1985

02/26/1985

02/26/198503/27/198509/30/198512/16/198502/19/1986

02/26/1985

02/26/198503/27/198502/19/1986

01/25/198502/27/198503/27/198504/26/198505/28/198506/24/1985

Sulfate <mg/L)

1313174.71.61.1

12026191619

1312186.53.41.79.216403417

131317

15

1416314616

12

141618

4.812103.39.93.0

Chloride <mg/L)

4.33.94.55.15.96.37.17.37.45.75.0

4.33.84.54.95.96.52.92.68.18.15.8

4.23.84.5

3.9

4.44.64.76.74.8

3.6

3.84.04.6

3.44.23.63.13.93.8

Fluoride <mg/L)

0.03.05

< .1.04.04.04.6.1.1

...

< .1

.03

.05< .1

.04

.04

.04

.07

.09

.2

.2...

.03

.06< .1

.07

.05

.08

.1

.3< .1

.06

.06

.05

.1

.02

.07

.06

.02

.05

.03

Bromide <mg/L)

0.02.02.032.03.04.05

< .010.020.033.012.063

.02

.02

.033

.03

.04

.04

.04

.02

.046

.038< .010

.02

.02

.026

.02

.03

.03< .010< .010

.010

.03

.02

.02< .010

.02

.02

.02

.03

.03

.03

Nitrate <mg/L)

< 0.04< .04< .44< .04< .04< .04< .44< .44< .44< .44< .44

< .04< .04< .44< .04

.27< .04

.09

.13< .44< .44< .44

.09< .04< .44

1.46

.13

.273.83.9.58

...

.44

.312.5

< .04.13.18

< .04< .04< .04

Phosphate <mg/L)

< 0.03< .03

...

< .03< .03< .03< .03

...

.006< .003

.006

< .03< .03

...

< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03

...

< .003

< .03< .03

...

< .03

< .03< .03

...

.006< .003

.06

< .03< .03

.003

< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03

Silica (mg/L)

5.33.83.94.96.06.96.45.64.94.53.4

5.53.74.04.65.56.32.12.46.66.64.6

5.43.74.0

4.9

5.3.27

2.04.23.3

5.0

4.77.43.9

4.74.24.74.45.14.5

103

Page 110: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 20.--Chemical analyses of surface water In HcDonalds Branch basin. January 24. 1985 through March 21. 1986-Continued

Sitename ornumber

S-8S-8S-8S-8S-8

S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9

0146650001466500014665000146650001466500014665000146650001466500014665000146650001466500014665000146650001466500

S-10S-10S-10S-10S-10S-10S-10S-10

Sample-collection

date

07/22/198508/19/198509/30/198510/21/198511/18/1985

01/24/198502/27/198503/27/198504/26/198505/28/198506/24/198507/22/198508/19/198509/24/198509/30/198510/22/198511/18/198512/16/198501/21/1986

01/24/198502/26/198503/26/198504/26/198505/29/198506/25/198507/22/198508/19/198510/22/198511/18/198512/17/198501/21/198602/18/198603/21/1986

04/26/198507/22/198509/30/198510/22/198511/18/198512/16/198501/21/198602/19/1986

Temper­atureCO

14.514.515.013.010.5

8.010.010.012.014.014.014.513.514.013.512.010.08.08.5

6.08.08.511.513.014.016.016.011.510.56.56.54.56.5

11.916.014.711.79.57.26.85.0

PHSpecific conductance

(units)field

4.24.73.4...3.2

4.54.44.54.64.54.54.54.84.53.94.54.33.84.4

4.54.44.54.64.44.44.54.54.54.44.34.44.03.9

4.54.43.84.53.83.84.44.0

lab

4.4...3.54.63.7

5.14.44.75.14.84.84.84.95.44.44.74.94.054.34

4.64.44.54.94.74.64.75.04.74.84.64.74.14.1

5.14.74.54.64.74.184.364.01

(MS/cm)field

4528

23543154

3637292732312926258428347145

2935292529302823343658447182

2831703041584280

lab

38...

20333137

24362723282624242367263166.041.3

2736292326262423283643306869

232757283654.439.276.6

Dissolvedoxygen(mg/L)

0.7.4.9

...

1.3

...

4.23.82.43.62.42.81.73.12.81.53.34.95.3

5.25.04.23.23.13.13.93.32.13.55.76.27.66.4

3.84.03.82.13.85.66.38.5

Alkalinity Alkalinity Dissolved (meq/L) as CaCOs organicDistrict (mg/L)

lab Central lab

<1<1<1<1<1

<1<1<1<1

+0.01 <1<1

...<1<1<1<1<1

- .05 * < .50< .50

... <1 **

... <1 **

... <1 **

... <i **

... <1 **

... <1 **

... <1 **

... <1 **

... <1 **

... <1 **

... <^ **

... <1 **

... <1 **

... <1 **

... <i **

... <i **

... <1 **

... <1 **

... <1 **

< .50< .50

.11 < .50

carbon(mg/L)

4.23.813127.2

.6

.4

.12.1.7.6

3.01.21.54.12.92.22.9...

2.31.92.32.52.61.72.62.22.83.73.03.55.57.3

2.23.75.32.43.62.54.07.2

104

Page 111: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 20.--Chemical analyses of surface water in McDonalds Branch basin. January 24. 1985 through March 21. 1986- Continued

Site name or number

S-8S-8S-8S-8S-8

S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9

S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9

0146650001466500014665000146650001466500014665000146650001466500014665000146650001466500014665000146650001466500

S-10S-10S-10S-10S-10S-10S-10S-10

Sample-

collection date

07/22/198508/19/198509/30/198510/21/198511/18/1985

01/24/198502/27/198503/27/198504/26/198505/28/1985

06/24/198507/22/198508/19/198509/24/198509/30/198510/22/198511/18/198512/16/198501/21/1986

01/24/198502/26/198503/26/198504/26/198505/29/198506/25/198507/22/198508/19/198510/22/198511/18/198512/17/198501/21/198602/18/198603/21/1986

04/26/198507/22/198509/30/198510/22/198511/18/198512/16/198501/21/198602/19/1986

Calcium Magnesium (mg/L) (mg/L)

0.20.20

2.3.24

1.5

.30

.60

.42

.30

.40

.31

.26

.30

.271.4.33.50

1.1.50

.28

.50

.41

.34

.39

.37

.34

.28

.40

.51

.80

.70

.991.1

.30

.291.0.41.50.90.50

1.1

0.22.20

2.0.27

1.6

.40

.50

.47

.30

.30

.29

.30

.30

.381.5.41.50

1.0.50

.29

.50

.43

.29

.37

.37

.36

.35

.51

.61

.80

.60

.79

.80

.30

.361.1.39.60.90.50

1.0

Sodium (mg/L)

2.01.94.51.84.1

1.72.21.81.91.9

1.81.71.71.73.21.82.02.51.9

1.72.1.8.7.8.7.7.7

2.32.42.22.12.22.4

1.91.83.01.82.22.31.92.5

Potassium (mg/L)

0.14.19.51.14.21

.32

.35

.29

.20

.27

.30

.20

.18

.25

.48

.22

.30

.35

.31

.3

.4

.3

.3

.2

.1

.2

.2

.2

.3

.5

.5

.5

.4

.20

.20

.50

.34

.32

.39

.34

.49

Ammonium (mg/L)

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

0.012.012

< .013< .026

.026< .013

.026< .013...

.013< .01

.03

.03

.01

.04

.01

...

...

...

...

...

.012

.006

.012

Aluminum (/*g/L)

7090

1,30060780

4070505050

505030402205070

350150

1106040504040502060...

13070

310370

6050150608014082

420

I ron Manganese (mg/L) (/*g/L)

530670790380500

4042414035

424437379035426337

435045587282130140110...

654792130

641201903001106747100

97

801258

413106

11

5434

368

112813

5775555491317102727

45

221013201130

Lead (/*g/L)

223

<12

<1<12

<1<1

42

<113

<1<11.0

<0.5

3<1326422

<122

<151

<1<12121.4

<0.51.4

105

Page 112: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 20.--Chemical analyses of surface water in McDonalds Branch basin. January 24. 1985 through March 21. 1986- Continued

Site name or number

S-8S-8S-8S-8S-8

S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9S-9

0146650001466500014665000146650001466500014665000146650001466500014665000146650001466500014665000146650001466500

S-10S-10S-10S-10S-10S-10S-10S-10

Sample- collection

date

07/22/198508/19/198509/30/198510/21/198511/18/1985

01/24/198502/27/198503/27/198504/26/198505/28/198506/24/198507/22/198508/19/198509/24/198509/30/198510/22/198511/18/198512/16/198501/21/1986

01/24/198502/26/198503/26/198504/26/198505/29/198506/25/198507/22/198508/19/198510/22/198511/18/198512/17/198501/21/198602/18/198603/21/1986

04/26/198507/22/198509/30/198510/22/198511/18/198512/16/198501/21/198602/19/1986

Sulfate (mg/L)

4.01.6

383.6

23

2.44.93.22.23.42.52.21.92.0

153.14.3

115.6

2.86.33.82.73.52.83.22.73.65.59.58.9

1112

2.42.6

113.65.38.35.113

Chloride (mg/L)

3.33.66.43.46.0

3.13.43.33.13.43.33.23.43.14.33.13.84.13.9

3.43.63.63.43.23.53.63.53.43.53.93.64.13.6

3.23.14.23.23.63.73.73.5

Fluoride (mg/L)

0.03.04.2.04.2

< .01.02.02.02.02.03.02.03.03.07.04.03.06.03

< .10< .10< .10< .10< .10< .10< .10< .10< .1< .1

.2< .1< .1< .1

.03< .01

.05

.04

.03

.03

.03

.06

Bromide (mg/L)

0.03.03

< .010.03

< .010

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.03

.03

.03

.03

.02

.02

.02

.02

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

.02

.03

.04

.02

.02

.02

.01

.01

Nitrate (mg/L)

< 0.04< .04< .44

.04< .44

.04

.09

.09< .04< .04< .04< .04

.04< .04< .04< .04

.04

.09

.04

< .44< .44< .44< .44< .44< .44< .44

.53< .44< .44< .44< .44< .44< .44

< .04< .04< .04< .04< .04

.04< .04

.62

Phosphate (mg/L)

< 0.03< .03

...

< .03

< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03

.006< .003

...

.031< .031< .031< .031< .031< .031

.092

.03

.03< .03< .03< .03

.03

< .03< .03

.03< .03< .03

.006< .003

.003

Si lica (mg/L)

4.94.59.04.57.9

4.34.14.34.34.24.34.14.14.46.14.34.55.54.5

4.24.33.94.03.93.93.84.04.24.44.94.54.44.1

4.34.16.04.44.65.14.34.2

* Samples titrated with .1 N HCL. All other alkalinities titrated at the District laboratory were titrated with .16 N H2SQt which may induce a 2 percent to 5 percent error in the alkalinity value.

** Alkalinity determined in the field by titration to a pH of 4.5.

106

Page 113: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 21.--Chemical analyses of ground water in McDonalds Branch basin. January 30. 1985 through February 26. 1986

[All cations, an1905, trace metals, and silica were measured as dissolved constituents; °C ( degrees Celsius; /iS/cm, microsjemens per centimeter; meq/L, milliequjvalents per literj mg/L, milligrams per liter; M9/L, micrograms per liter; lab, laboratory; -- indicates missing data; < indicates less than]

Sitename

QUC-1AQUC-1AQUC-1AQUC-1AQUC-1AQUC-1AQUC-1AQUC-1AQUC-1AQUC-1A

QUC-1BQUC-1BQUC-1BQUC-1BQUC-1BQUC-1BQUC-1BQUC-1BQUC-1BQUC-1B

QUC-2AQUC-2AQUC-2AQUC-2AQUC-2AQUC-2AQUC-2AQUC-2AQUC-2AQUC-2A

QUC-2BQUC-2BQUC-2BQUC-2BQUC-2BQUC-2BQWC-2BQUC-2BQUC-2BQUC-2B

QUC-3AQUC-3AQUC-3AQUC-3AQUC-3AQUC-3AQUC-3AQUC-3AQUC-3AQUC-3A

QUC-3BQUC-3BQUC-3BQUC-3BQUC-3BQUC-3BQUC-3BQUC-3BQUC-3BQUC-3B

QUC-4QUC-4QUC-4QUC-4QUC-4QUC-4QUC-4QUC-4QUC-4QUC-4

Sample- collection

date

02/07/198503/06/198504/03/198505/06/198506/05/198507/01/198508/23/198510/28/198512/19/198502/24/1986

02/07/198503/06/198504/03/198505/06/198506/05/198507/01/198508/23/198510/28/198512/19/198502/24/1986

02/08/198503/06/198504/05/198505/06/198506/06/198507/02/198508/26/198510/28/198512/19/198502/24/1986

02/08/198503/06/198504/03/198505/06/198506/06/198507/02/198508/26/198510/28/198512/19/198502/24/1986

02/08/198503/07/198504/04/198505/08/198506/07/198507/02/198508/26/198510/29/198512/20/198502/25/1986

02/08/198503/07/198504/04/198505/08/198506/07/198507/02/198508/26/198510/29/198512/20/198502/25/1986

02/11/198503/08/198504/05/198505/08/198506/07/198507/03/198508/27/198510/29/198512/20/198502/25/1986

Temper­ ature

8.08.58.010.010.011.013.512.010.08.5

9.511.011.012.011.011.012.010.09.011.0

6.58.09.011.013.014.018.014.09.57.5

11.511.511.012.011.511.513.011.010.511.5

11.511.510.511.011.013.014.012.011.011.0

11.511.511.512.011.512.015.011.010.511.5

11.511.512.012.011.011.513.512.011.011.0

pH (units)

field

4.84.84.84.95.04.84.54.74.44.6

5.15.15.25.25.35.24.85.25.05.2

4.6...4.54.54.54.04.44.04.34.5

5.0...5.05.05.05.25.04.64.94.8

5.14.95.35.35.35.25.15.25.15.0

4.94.65.05.05.04.95.15.04.55.0

5.05.15.15.15.15.05.05.04.95.1

lab

5.25.25.45.14.95.25.35.24.975.11

5.65.65.85.45.45.85.85.85.335.37

4.74.74.74.64.54.84.74.74.504.47

5.35.45.55.25.15.75.45.55.235.14

5.95.46.65.65.66.15.96.05.465.40

5.55.05.75.35.25.75.65.65.285.20

5.85.26.05.55.35.46.05.75.195.17

Specific conductance

(/iS/cm) field lab

31302931303029303026

30282827262425282926

4643454846

37495446

2524252523

21232320

1515151715

14151514

2424252625

23252616

2625282625

20302926

302930293030303126.428.0

333131282729293227 A27.2

314342454640414552.754.0

272727252426252519.219.1

191611161619181813.113.4

272428252527282822.921.4

272930262628323327.226.7

Dissolved oxygen

3.33.73.92.41.51.0.6.6

1.41.2

7.77.98.08.37.87.67.98.07.97.7

3.13.94.43.93.43.63.22.52.45.8

.5

.71.02.12.53.03.94.95.55.8

9.19.09.98.29.79.19.39.39.19.0

4.55.15.75.25.35.05.24.93.43.3

9.69.710.38.910.310.210.010.19.99.1

Alkalinity Alkalinity (meq/L) as CaCOs District (mg/L)

lab Central lab

...

...

...- 0.04

...

...

...

...+ .004*+ .012*

...

...

...- .11

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...- .03

...

...

...

...- .02**

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...- .10

...

...

...+ .014*

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...+ .014*

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...+ .008*+ .01 **

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< .50< .50

< 1< 1

1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1

.83

.81

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< .50< .50

< 1< 1

1< 1< 1< 1

1< 1

.70

.96

< 1< 1

< 1< 1< 1

1< 1

.52< .50

< 1< 1

1< 1< 1< 1

1< 1< .50

.61

< 1< 1

1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< .50< .50

Dissolved organic carbon (mg/L)

0.2.3

1.31.6.6.5.7.9.6

1.1

.4

.31.41.6.5.8.7

1.2.7

1.2

.7

.51.72.01.0.8

1.21.31.41.6

.3

.21.01.7.6

3.2.7.8.5

1.6

.3

.41.11.4.5.4.8.9.6

1.7

.4

.31.81.4.5.4.8

1.7.9

1.4

.5

.31.31.5.7

2.1.8

1.4.5

1.6

107

Page 114: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 21.--Chemical analyses of ground water in McDonalds Branch basin. January 30. 1985 through February 26. 1986--

Site name

QWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1AQWC-1A

QWC-1BQWC-1BQWC-1BQWC-1BQWC-1BQWC-1BQWC-1BQWC-1BQWC-1BQWC-1B

QWC-2AQWC-2AQUC-2AQWC-2AQWC-2AQWC-2AQWC-2AQWC-2AQWC-2AQWC-2A

QWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2BQWC-2B

QWC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3A

QWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3BQWC-3B

QWC-4QWC-4QWC-4QWC-4QWC-4QWC-4QWC-4QWC-4QWC-4QWC-4

Cont i nued

Sample- collection date

02/07/198503/06/198504/03/198505/06/198506/05/198507/01/198508/23/198510/28/198512/19/198502/24/1986

02/07/198503/06/198504/03/198505/06/198506/05/198507/01/198508/23/198510/28/198512/19/198502/24/1986

02/08/198503/06/198504/05/198505/06/198506/06/198507/02/198508/26/198510/28/198512/19/198502/24/1986

02/08/198503/06/198504/03/198505/06/198506/06/198507/02/198508/26/198510/28/198512/19/198502/24/1986

02/08/198503/07/198504/04/198505/08/198506/07/198507/02/198508/26/198510/29/198512/20/198502/25/1986

02/08/198503/07/198504/04/198505/08/198506/07/198507/02/198508/26/198510/29/198512/20/198502/25/1986

02/11/198503/08/198504/05/198505/08/198506/07/198507/03/198508/27/198510/29/198512/20/198502/25/1986

Calcium <mg/L)

0.70.70.70.80.70.76.66

1.0.70.80

1.21.21.21.11.11.21.01.11.11.1

.90

.90

.901.01.0.88.90

1.0.90

1.10

.70

.80

.70

.70

.70

.72

.601.0.50.50

.30

.30

.08

.30

.20

.23

.20

.31

.20

.20

.60

.60...

.70

.70

.69

.701.0.70.70

.80

.901.0.90.90.96

1.21.11.0.90

Magnesium <mg/L)

0.70.60.60.70.70.72.64

1.0.70.80

.90

.80

.80

.70

.70

.70

.711.0.90.90

.50

.40

.40

.50

.50

.40

.401.0.50.60

.50

.60

.60

.60

.60

.51

.40

.48

.50

.50

.30

.30

.02

.30

.30

.23

.20

.33

.30

.30

.50

.50...

.60

.60

.47

.501.0.60.60

.70

.70

.80

.80

.70

.79

.901.0.90.80

Sodium <mg/L)

1.81.91.71.81.71.81.72.01.72.1

1.71.81.61.61.61.61.52.01.51.7

1.71.81.71.81.71.61.72.02.02.6

1.61.81.61.61.71.61.61.61.51.7

1.71.6.4

1.61.51.51.52.01.41.6

1.82.0

1.91.91.81.82.01.71.9

.6

.5

.5

.7

.5

.51.52.01.51.6

Potassium <mg/L)

0.31.32.31.33.20.35.37.40.36.36

.35

.36

.34

.33

.22

.31

.39

.45

.42

.49

.16

.16

.17

.19

.14

.19

.20

.19

.17

.39

.28

.30

.33

.32

.29

.32

.33

.35

.32

.34

.22

.21

.06

.22

.14

.20

.23

.23

.21

.22

.31

.32

.35

.31

.35

.33

.34

.36

.34

.35

.36

.39

.35

.26

.41

.46

.51

.46

.44

Ammonium <mg/L)

...

...

...

...

...

...

...0.006.010

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

....006.010

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

....008.008

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

....005.004

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

....006.019

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

....004.018

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

....005.015

Aluminum

140150150140150130120120140160

60604050704040405458

9201,000900880820670640790

1,3001,100

50606060706060705664

2010

< 10< 10

102020301419

5050

< 1050606060605559

20< 10

2030203030202735

Iron

17186137

12< 3

55.5

< 2.0

1113131740169

13157.6

9352103364555199595.7

< 31151211146

24< 2

4

446

< 395102132

< 2.0< 2.0

47

< 310107

13109

< 2

10< 3< 3

1971420126.7

< 2.0

Manganese

27192526252022222023

30253029282427292623

100949299999487100100120

107

12109109877

65

< 1424352.31.9

19191022222226302423

11101513111517181213

Lead Mg/D

< 1151741

< 1< .5...

< 1< 1

4< 1

63

< 1< 1

1.6...

< 1< 1

3< 1

451

< 1< .5

...

< 112

< 18621.5

< 142

< 1107

< 1< 1

.6< .5

262

< 1< 1

611.5

344

< 1< 1

1< 1< 1< .5

108

Page 115: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 21.--Chemical analyses of ground water in HcDonalds Branch basin. January 30. 1985 through February 26. 1986-Cont 1 nued

Site name

QUC-1AQUC-1AQUC-1AQUC-1AQUC-1AQUC-1AQUC-1AQUC-1AQWC-1AQUC-1A

QUC-1BQUC-1BQUC-1BQUC-1BQWC-1BQUC-1BQWC-1BQUC-1BQWC-1BQUC-1B

QUC-2AQUC-2AQUC-2AQUC-2AQUC-2AQUC-2AQUC-2AQUC-2AQUC-2AQUC-2A

QUC-2BQUC-2BQUC-2BQUC-2BQUC-2BQUC-2BQUC-2BQUC-2BQUC-2BQUC-2B

QWC-3AQUC-3AQUC-3AQWC-3AQWC-3AQUC-3AQUC-3AQWC-3AQUC-3AQUC-3A

QUC-3BQUC-3BQUC-3BQUC-3BQUC-3BQUC-3BQUC-3BQUC-3BQUC-3BQWC-3B

QUC-4QUC-4QUC-4QUC-4QUC-4QUC-4QUC-4QUC-4QUC-4QUC-4

Sample- collection

date

02/07/198503/06/198504/03/198505/06/198506/05/198507/01/198508/23/198510/28/198512/19/198502/24/1986

02/07/198503/06/198504/03/198505/06/198506/05/198507/01/198508/23/198510/28/198512/19/198502/24/1986

02/08/198503/06/198504/05/198505/06/198506/06/198507/02/198508/26/198510/28/198512/19/198502/24/1986

02/08/198503/06/198504/03/198505/06/198506/06/198507/02/198508/26/198510/28/198512/19/198502/24/1986

02/08/198503/07/198504/04/198505/08/198506/07/198507/02/198508/26/198510/29/198512/20/198502/25/1986

02/08/198503/07/198504/04/198505/08/198506/07/198507/02/198508/26/198510/29/198512/20/198502/25/1986

02/11/198503/08/198504/05/198505/08/198506/07/198507/03/198508/27/198510/29/198512/20/198502/25/1986

Sulfate Chloride (mg/L) (mg/L)

4.84.74.84.94.95.04.74.54.75.5

5.55.25.15.04.74.84.95.56.15.9

9.79.59.59.69.29.18.59.21212

3.23.13.03.12.92.82.82.72.72.8

.78

.80

.40

.75

.73

.74

.71

.72

.67

.70

2.93.13.23.43.53.53.63.63.63.6

4.44.44.94.54.25.26.36.75.75.6

3.13.33.03.13.23.03.13.43.33.8

3.13.22.72.62.62.62.62.82.82.9

3.33.63.13.23.33.33.53.83.95.3

2.93.32.83.23.12.93.03.03.03.3

2.72.61.22.72.72.72.72.82.72.7

3.13.13.13.13.23.13.23.53.33.2

2.83.02.92.92.92.92.93.12.92.9

Fluoride (mg/L)

0.02.03.02.03

< .01.02.03.03.03.02

.02

.01

.03

.02< .01< .01

.01

.03

.03

.02

.03

.04

.04

.03

.03

.03< .01

.05

.04

.03

.02

.01< .01

.02< .01

.02< .01

.03

.02

.02

.02

.01< .01

.01< .01< .01< .01

.01

.02

.03

.01

.02

.02

.02< .01

.02

.01

.02

.03

.02

.02

.01

.03

.01< .01< .01

.01< .10

.02

.03

Bromide (mg/L)

0.03.03.02.03.03.03.04.03.04.04

.02

.03

.03

.02

.03

.02

.03

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.03

.02

.02

.03

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.03

.03

.02

.03

.03

.02

.02

.03

.02

.02

.03

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.03

.02

.03

.03

.02

.03

.03

.02

.02

.03

.03

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.03

.02

.011

.02

.03

Nitrate (mg/L)

0.13.18.18.13.13.09.13.13.13.13

< .04.09.09.04

< .04< .04

.09

.09

.09

.09

< .04< .04< .04< .04< .04< .04< .04

.04< .04< .04

.00

.04

.04

.04< .04

.04< .04

.09

.09

.09

.13

.31

.04

.13

.09

.09

.13

.18

.13

.13

.09

.18

.13

.13

.09

.09

.09

.13

.13

.13

.09

.13

.09

.09

.04

.09< .04< .44

.13

.13

Phosphate (mg/L)

< 0.03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .003

.012

< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .003

< .03< .03

.03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .003

< .03< .03< .03< .031< .031< .031< .031< .031< .003

< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .003< .003

< .031< .031< .031< .031< .031

.061< .031< .031< .003< .003

< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03

< 003loos

Silica (mg/L)

3.83.83.73.73.73.83.74.04.04.1

3.73.53.43.33.43.53.43.53.53.5

2.72.52.52.52.62.72.93.32.92.6

4.34.14.14.04.03.93.84.03.63.7

3.43.5.90

3.43.33.33.43.53.53.4

4.14.21.63.94.03.83.84.04.04.0

3.53.53.63.63.53.63.74.03.83.6

109

Page 116: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 21.--Chemical analyses of ground water in McDonatds Branch basin. January 30. 1985 through February 26. 1986--Continued

Site name

QWC-5AQWC-5AQUC-5AQUC-5AQUC-5AQUC-5AQUC-5AQUC-5AQUC-5AQUC-5A

QUC-5BQUC-5BQUC-5BQUC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5B

QWH-1AQWH-1AQUH-1AQUH-1AQWH-1AQUH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1A

QUH-1BQUH-1BQUH-1BQUH-1BQWH-1BQUH-1BQUH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1B

QWH-2AQUH-2AQUH-2AQUH-2AQUH-2AQUH-2AQUH-2AQUH-2AQUH-2AQUH-2A

QUH-2BQUH-2BQUH-2BQUH-2BQUH-2BQUH-2BQUH-2BQUH-2BQUH-2BQUH-2B

QUH-3AQUH-3AQUH-3AQUH-3AQUH-3AQUH-3AQUH-3AQUH-3AQUH-3AQUH-3A

Sample- Temper- collection ature

date CC)

02/07/198503/07/198504/04/198505/07/198506/06/198507/01/198508/23/198510/28/198512/20/198502/24/1986

02/07/198503/07/198504/04/198505/07/198506/06/198507/01/198508/23/198510/28/198512/20/198502/24/1986

01/31/198502/27/198502/28/198503/29/198505/01/198505/29/198506/26/198508/20/198510/23/198512/16/198502/20/1986

01/31/198502/27/198502/28/198503/29/198505/01/198505/30/198506/26/198508/20/198510/23/198512/16/198502/20/1986

01/30/198503/01/198503/28/198504/30/198505/29/198506/25/198508/20/198510/23/1985***12/16/1985***02/20/1986

01/30/198503/01/198503/28/198504/30/198505/29/198506/25/198508/20/198510/23/1985***12/16/1985***02/20/1986

02/01/198503/04/198504/01/198505/01/198505/31/198506/26/1985***08/20/1985***10/24/1985***12/17/1985***02/25/1986

8.510.010.011.011.512.015.013.511.59.5

10.012.012.012.012.012.013.011.510.511.5

4.54.53.57.511.513.514.518.014.08.04.0

11.511.510.511.511.511.011.013.011.511.511.0

9.510.010.012.511.013.517.0

9.0

11.511.512.012.011.511.513.011.511.512.0

9.08.510.515.513.5

9.0

pH (units)

field

5.05.05.05.04.84.94.74.64.64.9

4.8...5.05.04.94.94.84.74.85.0

4.0...4.14.04.04.03.93.83.43.63.7

5.04.65.25.15.25.14.94.84.74.84.9

4.64.84.94.84.84.95.2

4.4

4.54.84.84.74.84.85.84.74.94.8

4.54.54.55.35.6

4.5

lab

5.65.86.55.35.15.55.75.25.005.03

5.75.65.65.35.25.35.45.55.155.15

4.24.14.34.14.24.14.14.03.53.633.74

5.45.25.25.35.45.35.35.45.35.315.22

4.45.04.9...4.74.74.9

4.12

5.25.35.05.25.05.15.45.45.055.56

4.84.84.74.84.6

4.50

Specific conductance

(MS/cm) field lab

31293132303130323231

19181920191919202019

74767777766866101268165138

2827292829272723252625

5154556258

55

61

2726272625...24252624

3937383938

38

333214303031313229.330.8

201621191921212217.016.3

5868677365656294

241149125

27293030302928262723.020.9

59555666605655

74.2

272726212625262623.820.7

3434363336

39.4

Dissolved oxygen (mg/l)

8.9...9.29.5...............7.6

.7

.91.21.1.9.9

1.83.23.95.4

.1....1.2.1.3.2.3

2.4.4

1.1

.5....9

1.01.21.01.01.61.71.21.0

...

....3

...

...

...

...

1.61.61.61.41.41.31.71.52.25.5

...

...

...8.5...

...

Alkalinity Alkalinity (meq/L) as CaCOs District (mg/L)

lab Central lab

...- 0.02

...

...

...

...

...

...- .004*- .003*

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...+ .018*+ .016*

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...- .21**

...

...

...

...

...

.00

...

...

...

...+ .015*

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

- .07 **

...

...

...

...

.00

...

...

...+ .010*+ .009*

...

...

...

...

...

- .02**

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< .50< .50

< 1< 1

1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< .50< .50

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< .50< .50

< 11

< 1< 1< 1

1< 1< 1

11.21

< .50

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1

< .50

< 1< 1

41

< 1< 1< 1< 1< .50< .50

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1

< .50

Dissolved organic carbon (mg/L)

0.3.3

1.31.4.5.5

...1.0.6

1.3

.3

.21.61.7.7.6.5

1.0.6

1.4

2313131418253018171820

1.1.7.7.7

2.01.11.21.31.01.52.0

3.92.63.14.04.04.54.8

4.6

.8

.5

.41.6.7.9.7

1.11.31.4

.6

.5

.51.5.7

5.2

110

Page 117: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 21.-- in McOonalds Branch basin. January 30. 1985 through February 26. 1986-Continued

Site name

QWC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5AQUC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5A

QUC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQUC-5BQWC-5B

QWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQUH-1A

QWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQUH-1BQUH-1BQUH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1B

QWH-2AQUH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2A

QUH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2B

QWH-3AQUH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3A

Collection Calcium date (mg/L)

02/07/198503/07/198504/04/198505/07/198506/06/198507/01/198508/23/198510/28/198512/20/198502/24/1986

02/07/198503/07/198504/04/198505/07/198506/06/198507/01/198508/23/198510/28/198512/20/198502/24/1986

01/31/198502/27/198502/28/198503/29/198505/01/198505/29/198506/26/198508/20/198510/23/198512/16/198502/20/1986

01/31/198502/27/198502/28/198503/29/198505/01/198505/30/198506/26/198508/20/198510/23/198512/16/198502/20/1986

01/30/198503/01/198503/28/198504/30/198505/29/198506/25/198508/20/198510/23/1985***12/16/1985***02/20/1986

01/30/198503/01/198503/28/198504/30/198505/29/198506/25/198508/20/198510/23/198512/16/198502/20/1986

02/01/198503/04/198504/01/198505/01/198505/31/198506/26/1985***08/20/1985***10/24/1985***12/17/1985***02/25/1986

1.11.10.501.11.21.21.11.11.21.3

.20

.30...

.30

.30

.26

.26

.32

.30

.30

.40

.30

.30

.40

.40

.40

.34

.703.1.70.90

.50

.40

.40

.36

.40

.40

.40

.40

.32

.30

.30

.30

.40

.41

.54

.30

.30

.30

.30

.60

.70

.70

.70

.70

.70

.601.0.75.70

.60

.70

.69

.80

.70

.70

Magnesium (mg/L)

0.80.80.30.80.80.75.72

1.0.80.80

.30

.30...

.30

.40

.28

.38

.31

.40

.40

.08

.20

.20

.30

.20

.20

.18

.602.0.60.50

.30

.30

.30

.33

.30

.30

.30

.30

.30

.30

.30

.30

.30

.37

.40

.30

.30

.30

.30

.60

.50

.59

.60

.60

.60

.601.01.1.50

.20

.20

.21

.20

.20

.20

Sodium (mg/L)

1.71.6.7

1.61.61.61.52.01.61.7

1.81.6...1.61.71.61.62.01.61.7

1.92.32.32.22.12.02.23.04.01.73.0

1.71.91.91.81.81.81.81.72.01.81.8

2.22.02.11.92.02.02.0

2.5

1.51.61.71.61.71.61.61.51.61.7

1.11.41.21.11.2

1.4

Potassium (mg/L)

0.33.34.14.39.33.36.41.44.40.36

.27

.26...

.27

.28

.30

.33

.32

.33

.32

.13

.10

.09

.16

.15

.14

.16

.27

.58

.18

.12

.18

.17

.17

.18

.17

.15

.19

.20

.22

.20

.19

.08

.07

.08

.06

.08

.09

.12

.07

.19

.18

.19

.18

.19

.21

.21

.22

.21

.21

.10

.07

.09

.07

.09

.36

Ammonium (mg/L)

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...0.005.001

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

....006.018

..

.060

.051............................014.012

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

.032.........................008.006

...

...

...

...

...

.069

Aluminum Iron (M9/L) (M9/D

506020507060507083100

40401030403030203237

1,000890880880920

1.2001.200970

5,2002,7002,200

709090100110110110120130120140

910650570990

1,0001,1001,000

1,600

60605050606050506559

740960800740760

880

4128

< 32224212921

< 2.0< 2.0

65

< 311751564.6

< 2.0

3,3003,8003,7004,2003,5002,9002,9005,0001,300539320

2,6002,7002,7002,6002,6002,6002,4001,200990

1,5001,100

4,6006,4007,0006,2006,7005,9006,000

2,700

8127

151216578.0

< 2.0

11063245341

25

Manganese (M9/L)

707835738280818790100

45

< 155

< 1552.81.8

10746

116918702022

11< 1< 1

4616679.14.9

1477137

118

9.5

20111619201716172919

110110110110110

130

Lead (M9/D

1921116107

5-

6.26.6

< 19

< 1< 1

53

< 1< 1<<

4< 1< 1

82312

< 112

2< 1< 1< 1

4121

< 1< 1<

< 163

< 1< 1< 1

3

<

5102

< 1343

< 11

<

2< 1

681

-

.5

.5

.8

.5

.5

.8

.5

--

111

Page 118: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 21. Januarv 30. 1985 through February 26. 1986-

Site name

QWC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5AQUC-5AQWC-5AQWC-5AQUC-5AQWC-5AQUC-5AQUC-5A

UUC-5BQUC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5BQUC-5BQUC-5BQWC-5BQWC-5B

QWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQWH-1AQUH-1AQWH-1A

QWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1BQUH-1BQWH-1BQWH-1B

QWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2AQWH-2A

QWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2BQWH-2B

QWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3AQWH-3A

Continued

Sample- collection S

date

02/07/198503/07/198504/04/198505/07/198506/06/198507/01/198508/23/198510/28/198512/20/198502/24/1986

02/07/198503/07/198504/04/198505/07/198506/06/198507/01/198508/23/198510/28/198512/20/198502/24/1986

01/31/198502/27/198502/28/198503/29/198505/01/198505/29/198506/26/198508/20/198510/23/198512/16/198502/20/1986

01/31/198502/27/198502/28/198503/29/198505/01/198505/30/198506/26/198508/20/198510/23/198512/16/198502/20/1986

01/30/198503/01/198503/28/198504/30/198505/29/198506/25/198510/23/1985***12/16/1985***08/20/198502/20/1986

01/30/198503/01/198503/28/198504/30/198505/29/198506/25/198508/20/198510/23/198512/16/198502/20/1986

02/01/198503/04/198504/01/198505/01/198505/31/198506/26/1985***08/20/1985***10/24/1985***12/17/1985***02/25/1986

ulfate (mg/L)

5.75.82.25.96.16.05.65.66.36.9

1.2.3.2.2.3.2.3.4.5.7

7.49.89.6137.84.52.616582219

3.03.13.13.23.03.33.02.82.72.62.9

121111121413

1212

2.42.52.62.42.72.72.52.52.72.9

7.37.37.37.27.6

7.8

Chloride (mg/L)

3.12.9.84

3.03.03.03.13.23.13.3

2.92.82.93.03.02.92.83.13.13.0

4.44.95.05.24.55.96.45.77.38.06.3

3.33.43.43.23.13.33.53.53.63.23.5

4.24.34.44.64.84.8

5.05.6

3.43.03.23.33.53.43.53.63.23.6

2.32.72.22.12.4

2.6

Fluoride (mg/L)

0.03.03.02.03.02.02.03.04.03.03

.03< .01< .01

.02< .01< .01

.01

.02

.03

.01

< .01.03.03.04.04.03.05.04.3.1.1

.01

.02

.01< .01

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.04

.05

.05

.04

.06

.07

.02

< .01.01.02

< .10.01.01.02.02.02.01

< .01.02.04.04.04

.03

Bromide (mg/L)

0.02.03.01.02.03.02.03.02.02.02

.02

.03

.03

.02

.03

.02

.03

.02

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.04

.05

.04< .010< .010< .010

.02

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.02

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.04

.03

.02

.03

.03

.022

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.03

Nitrate (mg/L)

< 0.04.09

< .04.09.04

< .04< .13

.09

.09

.09

.09

.13

.09

.09

.04

.04

.09

.09

.09

.13

< .04< .04< .04

.13< .04< .04

.09< .04

...< .44< .44

< .04.09.09.09

< .04.22

< .04.04.09.09.04

< .04.09.04

< .04< .04< .04

< .04< .04

.09

.13

.09< .44

.04< .04

.09

.09

.13

.13

.04

.18

.18

.04

.09

.13

Phosphate (mg/L)

< 0.03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03

.003< .003

< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .003< .003

< .03.03

< .03.06.09.12.12.06....040.031

< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03

.006< .003

< .03.06

< .03< .03< .03< .03

< .03< .003

< .03< .03

.06

< .03< .03< .03< .03

.012< .003

< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03

.077

Silica (mg/L)

3.43.11.43.13.13.23.23.43.13.0

4.24.01.14.04.24.24.14.14.14.0

5.45.25.14.94.85.66.67.46.44.04.8

4.94.94.95.04.94.94.94.85.05.04.8

4.54.24.24.24.24.1

4.24.2

3.94.04.13.94.03.93.94.03.23.6

1.91.91.91.91.9

1.9

112

Page 119: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 21.--Chemical analyses of ground water in HcDonalds Branch basin. January 30. 1985 through February 26. 1986-Continued

Sitename

QWH-3BQWH-3BQWH-3BQWH-3BQWH-3BQWH-3BQWH-3BQWH-3BQWH-3BQUH-3B

QWH-4AQWH-4AQUH-4AQWH-4AQWH-4AQWH-4AQWH-4AQWH-4AQWH-4AQUH-4A

QWH-4BQWH-4BQWH-4BQWH-4BQWH-4BQWH-4BQWH-4BQUH-4BQWH-4BQWH-4B

QUH-5Af QUH-5A

QUH-5BfQUH-5B

QUO-1AQUO-1AQUO- 1AQUO-1AQWO-1AQWO-1AQWO-1AQUO-1AQUO-1AQUO-1A

QUO-IBQUO-IBQUO-IBQUO-IBQUO-IBQUO-IBQUO-IBQUO-IBQUO-IBQUO-IB

QUO-2AQUO-2AQUO-2AQWO-2AQUO-2AQUO-2AQUO-2AQUO-2AQUO-2AQUO-2A

Sample- Temper- collection ature

date

02/01/198503/04/198504/01/198505/01/198505/31/198506/26/198508/21/198510/24/198512/17/198502/25/1986

01/30/198503/01/198503/28/198505/01/198505/30/198506/26/198508/21/198510/24/198512/17/198502/20/1986

01/31/198503/01/198503/28/198505/01/198505/30/198506/26/198508/21/198510/24/198512/17/198502/20/1986

12/23/1 985 ff 02/26/1986***

12/23/198502/26/1986*

02/04/198503/04/198504/01/198505/02/198505/31/198506/27/198508/21/198510/24/198512/17/198502/21/1986

02/04/198503/04/198504/01/198505/02/198505/31/198506/27/198508/21/198510/24/198512/17/198502/21/1986

02/04/198503/05/198504/02/198505/02/198506/04/198506/27/198508/22/198510/25/198512/18/198502/21/1986

CO

11.511.011.512.511.512.013.012.010.511.0

11.510.511.011.011.011.014.013.011.511.0

11.511.512.512.512.011.513.011.510.512.0

...

10.0

8.57.510.010.513.014.017.515.010.58.0

11.511.012.012.511.511.513.512.011.012.0

6.58.08.510.012.013.016.015.09.07.5

PH (units)

field

4.84.94.94.84.94.74.84.84.84.8

4.75.05.15.05.04.74.84.74.84.9

4.95.15.15.15.15.15.05.05.15.1

4.4ftt

5.9

5.25.15.45.45.25.45.35.35.35.4

4.64.04.64.86.14.64.64.64.74.6

3.83.63.83.63.63.53.73.63.33.3

lab

5.25.35.15.35.25.15.35.45.024.87

5.45.65.25.45.15.15.55.15.034.97

5.45.65.35.65.35.15.55.65.34...

...

5.83

5.85.55.65.55.65.75.75.65.454.68

4.94.95.04.94.74.94.84.94.624.68

3.73.83.73.83.73.83.93.83.373.48

Specific conductance US/cm)

field

40394041404038393933

36363738373735353533

33333234323231323231

96ftt

62

65697066615950627276

43434442434240434342

115141148143146146120167292208

lab

414141364040404037.935.9

383937373838373634.233.6

363734353436353530.829.3...

35.4

637376666463586668.368.4

424242414341424143.742.7

122112124119127124105149260176

Dissolved oxygen

Alkalinity Alkalinity (meq/L) as CaCOs District (mg/L)

(mg/l) lab Central lab

8.3...

11.79.29.18.98.78.78.77.9

8.78.68.68.27.68.28.27.37.27.3

5.75.76.05.75.45.86.15.56.16.6...

.3

0.1....2.3.2.1.2.4.3.3

7.3

7.97.67.56.97.47.87.56.7

.5

.6

.77.5

4.5

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...+0.002*+ .002*

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...- .001*- .001*

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...- .15

...

...

...

...+ .004*

...

...

...

...- .07

...

...- .013*- .017*

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

.... .42**

<<<

<<< 1< 1< .50< .50

< 1< 1< 1

1< 1< 1< 1< 1< .50< .50

<<

<

<1.07.85

...

4.29

< 14

< 1< 1< 1< 1

355.45

< .50

< 1< 1

...< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< .50< .50

< 1< 1

...< 1

...

...< 1< 1< .50< .50

Dissolved organic carbon(mg/L)

0.8.4.4

1.7.8

1.21.51.02.81.8

.7

.4

.31.6.7.8

1.41.0.7

2.0

.7

.34.41.3.8.8.8.8

1.51.4...

3.0

4.73.65.27.64.13.63.55.38.08.4

1.4.5

1.43.0.9

1.31.31.3.8

1.4

32171617181915172738

113

Page 120: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 21.--Chemical analyses of ground water in McDonalds Branch basin. January 30. 1985 through February 26. 1986- Continued

Site name

QUH-3BQUH-3BQUH-3BQUH-3BQUH-3BQWH-3BQUH-3BQUH-3BQWH-3BQUH-3B

QUH-4AQUH-4AQUH-4AQUH-4AQUH-4AQUH-4AQUH-4AQUH-4AQUH-4AQUH-4A

QUH-4BQUH-4BQUH-4BQUH-4BQUH-4BQUH-4BQUH-4BQUH-4BQUH-4BQUH-4B

QUH-5AQUH-5A

QUH-5BQUH-5B

QWO-1AQUO-1AQUO-1AQUO-1AQUO-1AQUO-1AQUO-1AQUO-1AQUO-1AQUO-1A

QUO-IBQUO-IBQUO-IBQUO-IBQUO-IBQUO-IBQUO-IBQUO- IBQUO-IBQUO-IB

QUO-2AQUO-2AQUO-2AQUO-2AQUO-2AQUO-2AQUO-2AQUO-2AQUO-2AQUO-2A

Collection Calcium date (mg/L)

02/01/1985 .803/04/198504/01/198505/01/198505/31/198506/26/198508/21/198510/24/198512/17/198502/25/1986

01/30/198503/01/198503/28/198505/01/198505/30/198506/26/198508/21/198510/24/198512/17/1985

.9

.8

.8

.7

.7

.70'.7

.6

.9' 01 0"!9

.8

.8

.8

.8

.802/20/1986 1 .6

01/31/1985 1.503/01/1985 1.603/28/1985 .605/01/1985 .605/30/1985 .606/26/1985 .608/21/1985 .510/24/1985 .512/17/1985 1.602/20/1986 1.5

12/23/198502/26/1986

12/23/1985 .3002/26/1986

02/04/198503/04/198504/01/198505/02/198505/31/198506/27/198508/21/198510/24/198512/17/198502/21/1986

02/04/198503/04/198504/01/198505/02/198505/31/198506/27/198508/21/198510/24/198512/17/198502/21/1986

.1

.2

.2

.2

.2

.2

.3

.2

.3

.2

.2

.3

.3

.2

.3

.2

.1

.0

.0

.0

02/04/1985 .4003/05/1985 .4004/02/1985 .4005/02/1985 .4006/04/1985 .4306/27/1985 .4508/22/1985 .5110/25/1985 1.012/18/1985 .5002/21/1986 .20

Magnesium (mg/L)

.0

.9mm9

.0

.0

.90

.50

.80

.78

.70

.80

.65

.701.0.60.50

1.01.01.01.01.1.99

1.01.01.11.0...

.30

.70

.70

.80

.70

.70

.63

.601.0.80.70

.40

.50

.40

.50

.50

.47

.40

.40

.40

.40

.40

.40

.30

.30

.41

.40

.421.0.70.40

Sodium (mg/L)

1.72.01.91.91.91.91.82.01.92.1

1.71.81.91.92.12.11.92.01.61.6

1.41.51.51.51.61.61.51.41.61.7...

1.6

1.82.12.01.91.81.81.82.02.12.3

1.72.01.81.91.81.81.82.01.81.8

1.72.11.91.92.12.21.92.43.32.4

Potassium (mg/L)

0.37.37.37.38.40.38.38.42.38.40

.29

.29

.30

.24

.27

.25

.33

.36

.31

.23

.31

.30

.30

.30

.29

.27

.30

.32

.32

.29

...

.20

.25

.26

.29

.25

.27

.24

.31

.33

.38

.37

.27

.26

.27

.27

.24

.21

.21

.21

.26

.21

.08

.08

.09

.10

.10

.15

.15

.11

.22

.07

Ammonium (mg/L)

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...0.005.022

....008.006

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

....008.004

...

.067

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...1.01.2

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

....01.005

...

...

.037

.031

Aluminum Iron (09/L) (09/L)

608070100100110130100120150

120110130170210200190190230370

40303030303020302736

2,600

26

180200190180200160140180270300

830880860820840860970

1,000990

1,100

,500,700,500,400,500,400,300

4,0006,1003,600

1374

111714512

< 2.0< 2.0

6225

1311201812

< 2.0< 2.0

9< 3

41266538.0

< 2.0...

14,000

9,000...11,0008,9008,7008,4007,5008,60010,00010,000

71076983982.3

< 2

3,9003,8004,9005,9004,7003,9004,100

980560540

Manganese

63605959576158606061

86848284838584878673

30262930282826252923...

28

29272836243341396052

77677

68686163636363

13< 1

38329

118.74.2

Lead U9/D

4< 1

11

< 1232.6...

8104

< 1< 1

32

< 1< .5< .5

210231

< 1< 1< 1< .5< .5

...

< .5

< 11

< 1< 1

123

< 1< .5

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1

2213.4

< 1< 1

53

< 14211.81.0

114

Page 121: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 21.--Chemical analyses of ground water in McDonalds Branch basin. January 30. 1985 through February 26. 1986-

Site name

QUH-3BQUH-3BQUH-3BQUH-3BQUH-3BQUH-3BQUH-3BQUH-3BQUH-3BQUH-3B

QUH-4AQUH-4AQUH-4AQUH-4AQUH-4AQUH-4AQUH-4AQUH-4AQUH-4AQUH-4A

QUH-4BQUH-4BQUH-4BQUH-4BQUH-4BQUH-4BQUH-4BQUH-4BQUH-4BQUH-4B

QUH-5AQUH-5A

QUH-5BQUH-5B

QUO-1AQUO-1AQUO-1AQUO-1AQUO-1AQUO-1AQUO-1AQUO-1AQUO-1AQUO-1A

QUO-IBQUO-IBQUO-IBQUO-IBQUO-IBQUO-IBQUO-IBQUO-IBQUO-IBQUO-IB

QUO-2AQUO-2AQUO-2AQUO-2AQUO-2AQUO-2AQUO-2AQUO-2AQUO-2AQUO-2A

Continued

Sample- collection

date

02/01/198503/04/198504/01/198505/01/198505/31/198506/26/198508/21/198510/24/198512/17/198502/25/1986

01/30/198503/01/198503/28/198505/01/198505/30/198506/26/198508/21/198510/24/198512/17/198502/20/1986

01/31/198503/01/198503/28/198505/01/198505/30/198506/26/198508/21/198510/24/198512/17/198502/20/1986

12/23/198502/26/1986

12/23/198502/26/1986

02/04/198503/04/198504/01/198505/02/198505/31/198506/27/198508/21/198510/24/198512/17/198502/21/1986

02/04/198503/04/198504/01/198505/02/198505/31/198506/27/198508/21/198510/24/198512/17/198502/21/1986

02/04/198503/05/198504/02/198505/02/198506/04/198506/27/198508/22/198510/25/198512/18/198502/21/1986

Sulfate (mg/L>

7.97.67.67.87.98.07.87.77.68.1

7.37.17.27.47.77.67.57.37.37.3

6.66.56.66.66.86.66.66.66.46.1...

7.5

16171815151412131617

9.38.98.89.08.89.59.69.48.99.2

24242725292320425344

Chloride (mg/L>

3.33.33.43.43.53.73.63.43.53.8

3.43.33.33.13.43.93.53.33.23.3

2.82.72.82.73.02.82.82.93.03.4...

4.0

3.53.43.44.03.83.63.74.14.94.8

3.33.23.33.33.83.43.53.33.43.4

5.04.85.34.65.24.94.44.76.55.0

Fluoride (mg/L)

0.02.03.04.03.03.03.04.05.03.04

.02

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.04

.05

.04

.04

.01

.02

.03

.02

.02

.03

.04

.04

.02

.02...

.02

.03

.02

.04

.03

.03

.02

.02

.04

.03< .01

.02

.03< .10

.03

.02

.01

.02

.03

.02< .01

< .1< .1< .1

.1< .1< .1

.1

.2

.1

Bromide (mg/L>

0.02.03.03.03.03.03.03.02.03.03

.02

.03

.03

.02

.02

.02

.03

.02

.04

.02

.02

.03

.03

.02

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03

.03...

.03

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.03

.03

.03

.05

.02

.02< .01

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.26

.066< .010< .010

.20

.072< .010< .010

.035

.093

Nitrate (mg/L>

< 0.04.18.31.04.09.04.04.09.09.09

.09

.18

.13

.09

.13

.09

.09

.13

.09< .04

.09

.18

.13

.09

.181.46.13.13.13.13

...

< .04

< 0.04< .04

.04< .04< .04< .04< .04< .04< .04< .04

< .04.04

< .04< .04< .04< .04< .04

.09

.09< .04

< .44

< .44< .44< .44< .44< .44

< .44< .44

Phosphate (mg/L)

< 0.03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03

.006

.003

< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03

.006< .003

< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03

.03< .03

.006< .003

...

< .003

< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03

.009

.003

< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03

.006< .003

< .03

< .03

...

...

...

...

.043

.031

Silica (mg/L)

3.73.83.83.73.63.73.74.03.93.8

2.72.72.72.72.72.82.83.02.92.8

3.3.3.3.3.3.3.3.3.23.0...

5.2

5.16.37.56.05.25.13.95.3

1113

2.62.62.62.52.62.62.02.32.42.5

6.55.85.24.96.05.85.17.06.23.6

115

Page 122: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 21.--Chemical analyses of ground water in HcDonalds Branch hasin.January 30. 1985 through February 26. 1986- Cont 1 nued

Sample- Temper- Site collection ature name date CO

QUO-2BQUO-2BQUO-2BQUO-2BQUO-2BQUO-2BQUO-2BQUO-2BQUO-2BQUO-2B

QUO-3AQUO-3AQUO-3AQUO-3AQUO-3AQUO-3AQUO-3AQUO-3AQUO-3AQUO-3A

QUO-3BQUO-3BQUO-3BQUO-3BQUO-3BQUO-3BQUO-3BQUO-3BQUO-3BQUO-3B

LEAD WELLfLEAD WELL

02/04/198503/05/198504/02/198505/02/198506/04/198506/27/198508/22/198510/25/198512/18/198502/21/1986

02/05/198503/05/198504/02/198505/03/198506/04/198506/28/198508/22/198510/25/198512/18/198502/21/1986

02/05/198503/05/198504/02/198505/03/198506/04/198506/28/198508/22/198510/25/198512/18/198502/21/1986

1 2/23/1 985 ft02/26/1986| t

11.511.511.010.510.511.013.012.511.512.0

10.010.09.510.010.511.514.013.510.510.5

11.011.511.511.011.011.013.011.510.012.0...

11.0

PH (units)

field

4.54.54.74.54.64.04.54.54.44.3

4.64.54.64.54.54.54.54.44.44.5

4.74.64.74.74.74.64.54.64.64.6

5.6ft

lab

4.8...4.84.54.64.74.74.84.544.59

4.84.84.84.74.64.84.74.84.514.54

5.35.15.14.74.75.04.94.94.654.67

1 5 ;*

Specific coixluctance

(/iS/cm) field lab

43454446454441434545

47484848484847494944

38393940393938423842

33tti26

424242464542414142.745.6

464546474946464647.648.8

363737404038393940.842.1...

41.1

Dissolved oxygen (mg/l)

4.44.84.33.84.03.94.64.83.63.2

8.48.48.77.38.88.58.67.97.57.4

8.68.99.07.99.28.99.09.38.89.1......

Alkalinity Alkalinity (meq/L) as CaCOs District (mg/L)

lab Central lab

.

.----. -. -

0.011*- .020*

...

...

...

...- .03

...

...

...- .025*

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...- .015*- .017*

...

...

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< .50< .50

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< .50< .50

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1< .50< .50

...5.52

Dissolved organic carbon (mg/L)

1.1.6

1.42.91.01.01.11.21.12.1

1.1.7

1.32.01.11.11.31.41.31.4

.8

.51.31.5.9

1.0.8

1.21.01.4...

19

116

Page 123: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 21.--Chemical analyses of ground water in McDonalds Branch basin. January 30. 1985 through February 26. 1986-- Continued

LEAD WELL LEAD WELL

Site name

QUO -28QUO-2BQUO-2BQUO-2BQUO-2BQUO-2BQUO-2BQUO-2BQUO-2BQUO-2B

QUO-3AQUO-3AQUO-3AQUO-3AQWO-3AQUO-3AQUO-3AQUO-3AQUO-3AQWO-3A

QUO-3BQUO-3BQUO-3BQUO-3BQUO-3BQUO-3BQUO-3BQUO-3BQUO-3BQUO-3B

Collection Calcium date (mg/L)

02/04/198503/05/198504/02/198505/02/198506/04/198506/27/198508/22/198510/25/198512/18/198502/21/1986

02/05/198503/05/198504/02/198505/03/198506/04/198506/28/198508/22/198510/25/198512/18/198502/21/1986

02/05/198503/05/198504/02/198505/03/198506/04/198506/28/198508/22/198510/25/198512/18/198502/21/1986

0.80.90.90.90

1.0.79.75

1.0.70.80

1.31.31.31.41.31.31.21.21.21.3

1.21.31.31.31.21.21.11.11.11.2

Magnesium (mg/L)

0.30.30.30.30.30.24.26.30.30.30

.40

.40

.40

.40

.40

.43

.39

.40

.40

.40

.50

.50

.60

.50

.52

.52

.481.0.50.50

Sodium (mg/L)

1.41.61.51.72.01.51.51.61.81.9

1.92.01.91.82.02.02.02.02.02.0

1.61.61.61.72.01.61.62.01.61.9

Potassium Ammonium Aluminum Iron Manganese (mg/L) (mg/L) (/*g/L) (j*g/L) (**g/L)

0.17 1.100.15.16.14.14.15.15.16.17 0.19

.17

.15

.16

.15

.13

.18

.20

.19

.17

.17

.38

.41

.39

.39

.36

.33

.45

.49

.39

.38

1,1001,2001,2001,2001,1001,1001,100

006 1,200004 1,100

9201,0001,0001,1001,000950910900

005 920010 1,000

440520540590550610700710

005 670006 820

1016102712141212116.7

44257

201919272712

< 2.0

41681658109

< 2.0< 2.0

55465449433843464644

87838683868184889189

67637064595761636366

Lead (M9/L)

< 1< 1

5< 1

102

< 1< 1

.6< .5

1< 1

514

< 111

< .5< .5

< 1< 1< 1< 1< 1

2< 1< 1< .5< .5

12/23/1985 02/26/1986 .98 .25 3.6 3.4 .18 56 11 8.3

59111

117

Page 124: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 21. --C

Sitename

QUO-2BQWO-2BQUO-2BQWO-2BQWO-2BQUO-2BQWO-2BQWO-2BQUO-2BQUO-2B

QUO-3AQUO-3AQUO-3AQWO-3AQUO-3AQUO-3AQUO-3AQWO-3AQWO-3AQWO-3A

QUO-3BQUO-3BQUO-3BQUO-3BQWO-3BQUO-3BQUO-3BQUO-3BQWO-3BQWO-3B

LEAD WELLLEAD WELL

:hemical analyses of around water in McDonalds Branch basin. January 30. 1985 through February 26. 1986- -lontinued

Sample- collection Sulfate

date

02/04/198503/05/198504/02/198505/02/198506/04/198506/27/198508/22/198510/25/198512/18/198502/21/1986

02/05/198503/05/198504/02/198505/03/198506/04/198506/28/198508/22/198510/25/198512/18/198502/21/1986

02/05/198503/05/198504/02/198505/03/198506/04/198506/28/198508/22/198510/25/198512/18/198502/21/1986

12/23/198502/26/1986

* Titrations done at

** Samnles titrated ui

(mg/L)

9.08.99.59.89.99.78.98.79.19.9

109.9111010109.99.99.911

8.28.18.38.68.38.88.88.78.69.2. ..1.9

Central Lab,

th _1M HCl. .

Chloride(mg/L)

3.22.93.33.43.22.93.23.73.93.4

3.33.23.33.44.03.73.84.13.73.5

3.03.33.03.13.13.03.13.23.33.6...5.4

Fluoride(mg/L)

0.02.01.02.03.03.01.02.04.04.02

.02

.02

.03

.03

.04

.02

.02

.05

.04

.02

.03

.02

.04

.03

.03

.02

.03

.03

.04

.02

...

.08

alkalinity calculated by Gran

All other Altai initiee titral

Bromide(mg/L)

0.02.03.02.03.03.03.03.03.03.03

.02

.03

.02

.03

.02

.02

.03

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.02

.03

.02

.02

.01

...

.04

Function.

ted at the Di<

Nitrate(mg/L)

< 0.04.13.09

< .04< .04< .04< .18

.09

.09< .04

< .04.09.09

< .04< .04< .04< .09

.09

.09< .04

< .04.13.13

< .04.04

< .04< .18

.09

.09< .04

...

.13

strirt lahorat

Phosphate(mg/L)

< 0.03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .003< .003

< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .003< .003

< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .03< .003< .003

...< .003

orv uere titra

Silica(mg/L)

2.22.22.12.22.12.02.02.12.22.2

2.32.22.22.02.32.32.32.42.32.2

3.43.33.53.43.43.43.33.33.33.3...6.2

ited with.16 N H2S04 which may induce a 2 percent to 5 percent error in the alkalinity value.

*** Sample was not obtained due to lack of water in well.Well was drilled in September 1985 and sampled only twice (12/23/85 and 02/26/86).

4 Well was sampled by bailing because the yield was too low to sample by pumping, ft Value measured at District laboratory following sample collection.

Analysis deleted because the cation-am"on balance exceeded 30% difference. \ Value may be elevated due to disturbance of geologic materials when well was drilled.

118

Page 125: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 22. Statistical summary of chemical analyses of precipitation in McDonalds Branch basin. January 24. 1985 through March 18. 1986

[/iS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; mg/L, milligrams per liter; /xg/L, micrograms per liter; lab, laboratory; N is the number of samples; - indicates mean value was not calculated because minimum values were balow the detection limit; < indicates less than]

Constituent, statistic

pH District lab (units)NMinimumMedianMean*Maximum

pH Central lab (units)NMinimumMedianMean*Maximum

Specific conductance.District lab (/iS/cm)

NMinimumMedianMeanMaximum

Specific conductance.Central lab (/iS/cm)

NMinimumMedianMeanMaximum

Calcium (mg/L)NMinimumMedianMeanMaximum

Magnesium (mg/L)NMinimumMedianMeanMaximum

Sodium (mg/L)NMinimumMedianMeanMaximum

Potassium (mg/L)NMinimumMedianMeanMaximum

Ammonium (mg/L)NMinimumMedianMeanMaximum

PPT-1BC

144.14.44.34.7

174.144.44.45.2

1316293158

1712333061

17< .01

.20....74

17.03.08.13.57

17.15.49.92

4.4

17.02.07.10.25

17.09.32.35.89

Site name

PPT-1WC

154.04.34.34.8

184.14.34.45.2

1413232749

1812272746

17< .01

.07....44

17.02.05.09.45

17.11.40.67

3.5

17.02.04.06.14

18.05.25.27.77

PPT-2B

114.04.34.34.7

164.054.44.35.3

1019283045

1615333360

16.01.20.26.68

16.02.08.13.65

16.12.62

1.04.8

16.04.06.08.21

16.09.24.31.85

PPT-2W

134.04.34.34.7

164.094.44.45.2

1213222656

1612252751

16< .01

.12....58

16.01.06.10.49

14.14.39.78

3.7

15.02.04.06.16

16.03.18.27.91

119

Page 126: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 22. 1tatistical anuary Z4. fummary of chemical analyses of precipitation in McDonalds Branch basin. 985 through March 18. 1986--Continued

Constituent, statistic PPT-1BC

Site name

PPT-1WC PPT-2B PPT-2W

Aluminum (pg/L) NMinimum Median Mean Maximum

178, <10 12

40

177. <10 20

50

1610202060

149. <10 12

60

LeadNMinimumMedianMeanMaximum

16<14

12

16<12

11

16<14

13

12<14

16

Sulfate (mg/L) NMinimum Median Mean Maximum

171.32.62.86.4

18.61

2.22.3 4.5

161.62.62.96.1

16.89

1.82.35.1

Chloride (mg/L) NMinimum Median Mean Maximum

17.03.80

1.68.6

18.22.76

1.36.7

16.33 .78 .6

9.2

16.15.74

1.37.2

Fluoride (mg/L) NMinimum Median Mean Maximum

Bromide (mg/L) NMinimum Median Mean Maximum

17.01 .03 .03 .04

17< .01

.02

.04

18.01 .02 .03 .05

18< .01

.01

.03

16.01 .03 .03 .05

16< .01

.02

.33

16< .01

.02

.05

16< .01

.01

.04

Nitrate (mg/L) NMinimum Median Mean Maximum

17.99

1.92.14.9

18.22

1.61.7 3.1

161.02.02.1 3.9

16.31

1.41.83.7

Phosphate (mg/L)

Minimum Median Mean Maximum

10.002. < .003 .031

.215

9< .003

.031

.245

8< .003

.046

.429

10< .003

.031

.552

Mean pH values were calculated by first converting all individual pHs to hydrogen-ion concentrations. Then the mean hydrogen-ion concentration was calculated and converted to pH.

120

Page 127: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 23.--Statistical summary of chemical analyses of selected surface waters in McDonalds Branch basin. January 24. 1985 through March 21. 1986

[°C, degrees Celsius; juS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; mg/L, milligrams per liter; A*g/L, micrograms per liter; N is the number of samples; -- - indicates mean value was not calculated because minimum values were below the detection limit; < indicates less than]

Constituent, statistic

Temperature (°C)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Field pH (units)NMinimumMean*MedianMaximum

Lab pH (units)NMinimumMean*MedianMaximum

S-l

111.08.17.0

17.5

113.23.63.74.2

113.23.73.84.1

Site name or number

S-9

148.0

11.612.014.5

143.84.34.54.8

144.14.64.85.4

01466500

144.59.99.5

16.0

143.94.34.44.6

144.14.54.75.0

Field specific conductance(/iS/cm)

NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Lab specific conductance(/iS/cm)

NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Dissolved oxygen (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

1160

146114440

1159

132106432

10.5

4.23.8

10.6

1425383284

1423332767

131.53.23.15.3

1423403282

1423352969

142.14.54.17.6

121

Page 128: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 23.--Statistical summary of chemical analyses of selected surface waters in McDonalds Branch basin. January 24. 1985 through March 21. 1986-- Continued

Constituent, statistic S-l

Site name or number

S-9 01466500

Dissolved organic carbon(mg/L)

N 11 Minimum 5.6 Mean 19 Median 19 Maximum 37

Calcium (mg/L)N 11 Minimum .30 Mean 1.13 Median .80 Maximum 5.20

Magnesium (mg/L)N 11 Minimum .10 Mean .67 Median .50 Maximum 3.00

Sodium (mg/L)N 11 Minimum 2.2 Mean 2.9 Median 2.6 Maximum 5.0

Potassium (mg/L)N 11 Minimum .06 Mean .20 Median .18 Maximum .39

Ammonium (mg/L)N 3 Minimum .022 Mean .023 Median .023 Maximum .023

131.12.11.74.1

14.26.50.37

1.40

14.29.51.41

1.50

141.72.01.93.2

14.18 .29 .30 .48

.012

.012

.012

.012

141.73.12.67.3

14.28.53.41

1.10

14.29 .51 .47 .80

141.72.02.02.4

14.10 .31 .30 .50

13< .013, < .026

.013

.04

122

Page 129: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 23.--Statistical summary of chemical analyses of selected surface waters inMcDonalds Branch basin. January 24. 1985 throueh March 21. 1986- -Continued

Constituent, statistic

Aluminum (/ig/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Iron (/ig/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Manganese (/ig/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Lead (/ig/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Sulfate (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Chloride (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

S-l

11550

1,855880

10,000

11360

1,397580

4,700

114

252096

11< 1-__2.68.0

111.1

2316

120

113.95.75.77.4

Site name or number

S-9

14309150

350

1435454190

143

119

36

14< .5, <1...1.04.0

141.94.63.2

15

143.13.53.44.3

01466500

1320

10460

370

13438272

140

144

107

27

14< 1...36

142.75.63.7

12

143.23.63.64.1

123

Page 130: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 23.--Statistical summary of chemical analyses of selected surface waters in McDonalds Branch basin. January 24. 1985 through March 21. 1986-- Continued

Constituent, statistic S-l

Site name or number

S-9 01466500

Fluoride (mg/L) NMinimum Mean Median Maximum

Bromide (mg/L) NMinimum Mean Median Maximum

Nitrate (mg/L) NMinimum Mean Median Maximum

Phosphate (mg/L) NMinimum Mean Median Maximum

10 < .10,

.08

.60

11 < .010

.03

.063

11 < .04, <

<0.44

< 0.003

.03

.006

.03

.44

14 < .01

.03

.07

14.02 .02 .02 .03

14 < .04

.04

.09

14 < 0.003

.006, <0.03

14 < 0.10

.20

14 < .44

.53

13 < 0.03

.09

Silica (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

113.45.14.96.9

144.14.54.36.1

143.84.24.24.9

* Mean pH values were calculated by first converting all individual pHs to hydrogen-ion concentrations. Then the mean hydrogen-ion concentration was calculated and converted to pH.

124

Page 131: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 24. --Statistical summary of chemical analyses of ground water in McDonalds Branch basin. January 30. 1985through February 26. 1986

[*C, degrees Celsius; pS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; mg/L, milligrams per liter; mg/L, per liter; N is the number of samples; --- indicates missing data; < indicates less than]

Constituent,statistic

Temperature (*C)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Field pH (units)NMinimumMean*MedianMaximum

Lab pH (units)NMinimumMean*MedianMaximum

Field specific conductance(/iS/cm)

NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Lab specific conductance

NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Dissolved oxygen (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Dissolved organiccarbon (mg/L)

NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Calcium (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Magnesium (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Sodium (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Potassium (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedi anMaximum

QUC-1A

108.010.010.013.5

104.44.74.85.0

104.95.15.25.4

1026303031

1026.4293031

10.6

2.01.53.9

10.2.8.7

1.6

10.66.75.70

1.0

10.60.72.70

1.0

101.71.81.82.1

10.20.33.34.40

QUC-1B

109.010.811.012.0

104.85.15.25.3

105.35.65.65.8

1024272830

1027292933

107.67.97.98.3

10.3.9.8

1.6

101.01.11.11.2

10.7.8.8

1.0

101.51.71.62.0

10.22.37.36.49

Site

QUC-2A

106.511.110.318.0

94.04.34.54.6

104.474.64.74.8

937464654

1031444454

102.43.63.55.8

10.5

1.21.32.0

10.88.95.90

1.1

10.40.52.50

1.0

101.61.91.82.6

10.14.20.18.39

name

QUC-2B

1010.511.511.513.0

94.64.95.05.2

105.15.35.45.7

920232325

1019.1242527

10.5

3.02.85.8

10.2

1.1.8

3.2

10.50.69.70

1.0

10.40.53.51.60

101.51.61.61.8

10.28.32.32.35

QUC-3A

1010.511.711.314.0

104.95.15.25.3

105.45.75.86.6

914151517

1011161619

108.29.29.19.9

10.3.8.7

1.7

10.08.23.22.31

10.02.26.30.33

10.30

1.41.62.0

10.06.19.22.23

micrograms

QUC-3B

1010.511.811.515.0

104.54.95.05.1

105.05.35.45.7

916242526

1021.4262628

103.34.85.15.7

10.3

1.0.9

1.8

9.6.7.7

1.0

9.47.6.6

1.0

91.71.91.92.0

9.31.33.34.36

125

Page 132: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 24. --Statistical summary of chemical analyses of groundJanuary 30. 1985 through February 26,

water in McDonalds Branch basin.1986- -Continued

Site nameConstituent,

statistic

Aluminum (/*g/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Iron (/ig/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Manganese (jig/DNMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Lead (/ig/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Sulfate (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Chloride (mg/L>NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Fluoride (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Bromide (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Nitrate (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Silica (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

QUO-1A

10140200185300

97,5009,1228,90011,000

1024373560

9<1, < .5

<13

1012151518

103.43.93.84.9

10< .01

.03

.04

10.02.03.02.05

10< .04

< .04.04

103.96.85.713.0

QUO-IB

10820915870

1,100

10<2

839

107

606377

9<1

<13.4

108.89.19.19.6

103.23.43.43.8

10< .01,< .10

.03, .10

10< .01

.02

.02

10< .04

< .04.09

102.02.52.62.6

QWO-2A

101,3002,4001,5006,100

10540

3,3283,9005,900

10<1

4.213

10<1

1.05

1020312653

104.45.05.06.5

9< .1

< .1.2

10< .01

.05

.26

8< .44

< .44

103.65.65.87.0

QWO-2B

101,1001,1401,1001,200

106.7131227

1038464655

10<1, < .5

<110

108.79.39.39.9

102.93.33.33.9

10.01.02.02.04

10.02.03.03.03

10< .04, <

< .18, .

102.02.12.22.2

QUO-3A

10900970975

1,100

10<2.0

2044

1081868691

10<1, < .5

15

109.9101011

103.23.63.64.1

10.02.03.03.05

10.02.02.02.03

10.18 < .04, <

13 < .09,

102.02.32.32.4

QWO-3B

10440615600820

10<2.08816

1057636370

10<1, < .5

<12

108.18.68.69.2

103.03.23.13.6

10.02.03.03.04

10.01.02.02.03

10.09 < .04, < .18

.09 < .18, .13

103.33.43.43.5

Mean pH values were calculatd by first converting all individual pHs to hydrogen-ion concentrations, hydrogen-ion concentration was calculated and converted to pH.

Then the mean

126

Page 133: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

through February 26. 1986- -Continued

Constituent, statistic

Temperature (°C)MMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Field pH (units)NMinimumMean*MedianMaximum

Lab pH (units)NMinimumMean*MedianMaximum

Field specific conduct­ance (/iS/cm)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Lab specific conduct­ance (/iS/cm)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Dissolved oxygen (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Dissolved organiccarbon (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Calcium (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Magnesium (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Sodium (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Potassium (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Site name

QWC-4

1011.011.711.513.5

104.95.05.15.1

105.175.45.56.0

920262630

1026282733

108.99.810.010.3

10.3

1.11.12.1

10.8

1.0.9

1.2

10.70.81.80

1.00

101.51.61.52.0

10.26.40.40.51

QUC-5A

108.511.311.315.0

104.64.84.95.0

105.05.35.46.5

1029313132

1014293033

47.68.89.19.5

9.3.8.6

1.4

10.5

1.11.11.3

10.30.8.8

1.0

10.7

1.61.62.0

10.14.35.36.44

QUC-5B

1010.011.712.013.0

94.74.94.95.0

105.155.45.45.7

1018191920

1016192022

10.7

2.01.25.4

10.2.9.7

1.7

9.20.30.30.32

9.28.34.31.40

91.61.71.62.0

9.26.30.30.33

QWH-1A

113.59.48.018.0

103.43.84.04.1

113.53.94.14.3

116610877

268

11589768

241

10.1.5.3

2.4

1113191830

11.30.7.4

3.1

11.08.5.2

2.0

111.72.42.24.0

11.09.19.15.58

QUH-1B

1110.511.411.313.0

114.64.94.95.2

115.25.35.35.4

1123272729

1120.9272830

10.5

1.11.01.7

11.7

1.21.12.0

11.3.4.4.5

11.30.30.30.33

111.71.81.82.0

11.15.18.18.22

127

Page 134: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 24. --Statistical summary of chemical analyses of ground water in McDonalds Branch basin. January 30, 1985through February Z6. 1986- -continued

Constituent,statistic

Aluminum (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Iron (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Manganese (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Lead (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Sulfate (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Chloride (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Fluoride (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Bromide (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Nitrate (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Silica (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Site name

QUC-4

10<10...2435

10<2 <3...920

1010141318

9<1, < .5......4

104.25.25.16.7

102.82.92.93.1

10< .01, < .1......

.03, < .1

10.011.02.02.03

10< .04, < .4......

.13

103.53.63.64.0

QUC-5A

10206160100

10<2 <3

...2241

10357881100

95

107

21

102.25.65.96.9

10.84

2.93.13.3

10.02.03.03.04

10.01.02.02.03

10< .04,......< .13,

101.43.03.13.4

QUC-5B

1010313140

10<2 <3

...615

10<1.0

...55.0

10<1, < .5

...

...9

101.21.31.31.7

102.83.03.03.1

10< .01....01.03

10.02.03.03.03

10< .13 .04

.09

.09.09 .13

101.13.84.14.2

QUH-1A

11880

1,6401,0005,200

11320

2,8603,3005,000

114171070

11<1

...28

112.6

151058

114.45.85.78.0

11< .01....04.30

11< .01...

.03

.05

10< .04,.......13

114.05.55.27.4

QUH-1B

1170108110140

11990

2,0902,6002,700

11<1.0...6

11

11<1, < .5......4

112.63.03.03.3

113.13.43.43.6

11< .01...

.02

.02

11.02.03.03.03

11< .4 < .04

....09.22

114.84.94.95.0

128

Page 135: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 24.- -Statistical summary of chemical analyses of ground water in McOonalds Branch basin. January 30. 1985through February 26. 1986 -Continued

Const i tuent ,statistic

Temperature CONMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Field pH (units)NMinimumMean*MedianMaximum

Lab pH (units)NMinimumMean*MedianMaximum

QUH-2A

89.011.610.517.0

84.44.74.85.2

74.124.64.75.0

QUH-2B

1011.511.811.713.0

104.54.84.85.8

105.05.25.25.56

Site

QUH-3A

68.511.09.815.5

64.54.74.55.6

64.54.74.84.8

name

QUH-3B

1010.511.611.513.0

104.74.84.84.9

104.875.25.25.4

QUH-4A

1010.511.611.014.0

104.74.84.95.1

104.975.25.25.6

QUH-4B

1010.511.911.813.0

104.95.15.15.1

95.15.45.45.6

Field specific conduct­ ance (/jS/cm) NMinimum Mean Median Maximum

Lab specific conduct­ ance (/jS/cm) NMinimum Mean Median Maximum

Dissolved oxygen (mg/L) NMinimum Mean Median Maximum

Dissolved organic carbon (mg/L) NMinimum Mean Median Maximum

Calcium (mg/L) NMinimum Mean Median Maximum

Magnesium (mg/L) NMinimum Mean Median Maximum

Sodium (mg/L) NMinimum Mean Median Maximum

Potassium (mg/L) NMinimum Mean Median Maximum

751575562

855605874.

8 2.63.94.0 4.8

8.30 .36 .30 .54

8.30 .32 .30 .40

81.92.12.02.5

8

924.025.626.027.0

1020.7252627

101.32.01.65.5

10.4.9.9

1.6

10 .60 .7 .7

1.0

10 .50 .7 .6

1.1

101.51.61.61.7

637383839

633353539.4

.06

.08

.08

.12

10.18 .20 .20 .22

6.5

1.5.7

5.2

.60

.70

.70

.80

.20

.20

.20

.21

61.11.2 1.2 1.4

.07

.13

.09

.36

1033394041

1035.9394041

97.99.08.711.7

10.4

1.2 1.1 2.8

101.61.81.82.0

10 .9

1.1 1.1 1.1

101.71.91.92.1

1033363638

1033.6373739

107.28.08.28.7

10.3

1.0.8

2.0

101.61.81.82.0

10.5.7.7

1.0

101.61.91.92.1

1031323234

1029.3343537

105.45.95.86.6

10.3

1.3.8

4.4

101.51.6 1.6 1.6

10.99

1.01.01.1

101.41.5 1.5 1.7

10.37 .39 .38 .42

10.23 .29 .29 .36

10.27 .30 .30 .32

129

Page 136: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

of chemical analyses of ground Hater in McDonalds Branch basin. January 30. 1985through February 26. 1986 --Continued

Constituent,statistic

Aluminum (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Iron (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Manganese (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Lead (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Sulfate (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Chloride (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Fluoride (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Bromide (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Nitrate (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Silica (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Site name

QWH-2A

8570977995

1,600

82,7005,6876,1007,000

8710914

8<1, < .5...<16.0

811121214

84.24.74.75.6

8.02.04.05.07

8.02.03.03.04

8< .04...< .04

.09

84.14.24.24.5

QUH-2B

1050566065

10<2...816

1011181829

10<1, '< .5...310

102.42.62.62.9

103.03.43.43.6

10< .01, <

...

...

.02, <

10.02.03.03.03

10< .04, <

...

...

.13, <

103.23.93.94.1

QUH-3A

6740813780960

6245347110

6110113110130

5<1...28

67.27.47.37.8

62.12.42.42.7

6.10 < .01

...

.04.10 .04

6.02.02.02.03

6.40 .04

.11

.11.40 .18

61.91.91.91.9

QUH-3B

1060102100150

10<2.0...917

1057606063

9<1, -6

14

107.67.87.88.1

103.33.53.53.8

10.02.03.03.05

10.02.03.03.03

10< .04

.10

.31

103.63.83.84.0

QUH-4A

10110192190370

10<2.0

1222

1073838487

10<1, < .5...<110

107.17.47.37.7

103.13.43.33.9

10.02.03.03.05

10.02.03.02.04

10< .04

...

.09

.18

102.72.82.83.0

QUH-4B

1020303040

10<2 <3...612

1023272830

10<1, < .5...<110

106.16.56.66.8

102.72.92.83.4

10.01.03.02.04

10.02.03.03.03

10.09.27.13

1.46

103.03.13.13.2

130

Page 137: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

through February 26. 1986 --Continued

Constituent,statistic

Temperature (°C)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Field pH (units)NMinimumMean*MedianMaximum

Lab pH (units)NMinimumMean*MedianMaximum

Field specific conduct­ance (/xS/cm)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Lab specific conduct­ance (/iS/cm)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Dissolved oxygen (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Dissolved organiccarbon (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Calcium (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Magnesium (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Sodium (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Potassium (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

QUO-1A

107.511.510.517.5

105.15.35.35.4

104.75.45.65.8

1050656676

1058676676

9.1.2.2.4

103.55.45.08.4

101.11.21.21.3

10.60.7.7

1.0

101.82.02.02.3

10.24.30.28.38

QWO-1B

1011.011.911.813.5

104.04.54.66.1

104.64.84.95.0

1040434344

1041424243.7

96.77.47.57.9

10.5

1.31.33.0

101.01.21.201.30

10.40.41.40.50

101.71.81.82.0

10.21.24.25.27

Site

QUO-2A

106.510.69.516.0

103.33.53.63.8

103.373.73.83.9

10115163146292

10105142124260

5.5

2.8.7

7.5

1015.021.617.538.0

10.2.5.4

1.0

10.30.5.4

1.0

101.72.22.13.3

10.07.12.10.22

name

QUO-2B

1010.511.511.513.0

104.04.44.54.7

94.54.74.74.8

1041444546

1041434246

103.24.14.24.8

10.6

1.41.12.9

10.70.9.9

1.0

10.24.29.30.30

101.41.71.62.0

10.14.16.16.19

QWO-3A

109.511.010.514.0

104.44.54.54.6

104.514.74.84.8

1044484849

1045474649

107.38.28.48.8

10.7

1.31.32.0

101.21.31.31.4

10.39.40.40.43

101.82.02.02.0

10.13.17.17.20

QUO-3B

1010.011.411.313.0

104.54.64.64.7

104.654.94.95.3

1038393942

1036.0393942.1

107.98.99.09.3

10.5

1.01.01.5

101.11.21.01.3

10.48.6.5

1.0

101.61.71.62.0

10.33.40.39.49

131

Page 138: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

Table 24. --Statistical summary of chemical analyses of ground water in McDonalds Branch basin.January 30. 1985 through February 26. 1986 --Continued

Constituent,statistic

Aluminum (/zg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Iron (jtg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Manganese (/zg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Lead (jtg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Sulfate (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Chloride (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Fluoride (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Bromide (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Nitrate (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Silica (mg/L)NMinimumMeanMedianMaximum

Site name

QUO-1A

10140200185300

97,5009,1228,90011,000

1024373560

9<1, < .5

<13

1012151518

103.43.93.84.9

10< .01

.03

.04

10.02.03.02.05

10< .04

< .04.04

103.96.85.713.0

QUO- IB

10820915870

1,100

10<2

839

107

606377

9

<13.4

108.89.19.19.6

103.23.43.43.8

10

.03,

10< .01

.02

.02

10< .04

< .04.09

102.02.52.62.6

QUO-2A

101,3002,4001,5006,100

10540

3,3283,9005,900

10<1

4.213

10

1.05

1020312653

104.45.05.06.5

9.10 < .1

< .1.10 .2

10< .01

.05

.26

8< .44

< .44

103.65.65.87.0

QUO-2B

101,1001,1401'1001,200

106.7131227

1038464655

10<1, < .5

<110

108.79.39.39.9

102.93.33.33.9

10.01.02.02.04

10.02.03.03.03

10< .04, <

< .18, .

102.02.12.22.2

QUO-3A

10900970975

1,100

10<2.0

2044

1081868691

10<1, < .

15

109.9101011

103.23.63.64.1

10.02.03.03.05

10.02.02.02.03

10.18 < .04,

13 < .09,

102.02.32.32.4

QWO-3B

10440615600820

10<2.08816

1057636370

10.5 <1, < .5

<12

108.18.68.69.2

103.03.23.13.6

10.02.03.03.04

10.01.02.02.03

10< .09 < .04, < .18

.09 < .18, .13

103.33.43.43.5

* Mean pH values were calculatd by first converting all individual pHs to hydrogen-ion concentrations, hydrogen-ion concentration was calculated and converted to pH.

Then the mean

132 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1990 714-384

Page 139: HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM AN ACIDIC DEPOSITION …

DE

PA

RT

ME

NT

OF

T

HE

IN

TE

RIO

R

U.S

. GE

OL

OG

ICA

L S

UR

VE

Y

<\ o\-

<o

WA

TE

R-R

ES

OU

RC

ES

INV

ES

TIG

AT

ION

S R

EP

OR

T 8

8-4

211

Plate

1

J

Ph

-592

7-5

35

7-5

86

7-3

68

7

-58

7

7-3

69

Ph

-799

7-3

70

* ',(; "** * v

*'" "*"**^'-''**' - *"' *' 1 5

-94

,?auis

o

BK

-1153

BK

-1154

BK

-1155

BK

-11

56

/^y/4

^9

i;:~?;?

^

£i^£

*';:^f-^£-^

#W« teif" '^l^

^^^^^^^m

^ f^i^^Jp

^S

S?f

39\'^

R

. / ^^j'^

^^ki-^jv?

' K

te-V

?^- ::^.>

-S

^:<

^g

.^i-_-.-

7-56o

/ >_335-*T

-3S

o:-.v-.--'*-5

,,4?.?

. -,><;. .:v.

" :^*.^

T.r.l..'V:-:-.;.1 .'. ;.:;.'5

-89:'v

X-±

i:

^

7-aes //

c (2

,^

%-i2

7;*"

'%^

^y'i

M'?

AvV

-:^f.?

?V

»

/^ ^

^

*>

/*'""

\

**¥.

, ", J

O*^

Ir

t*

*

J» W

*

»

*.* "* 'V

a.

Sl<

^

^^

^

a!»

7-1

93

\ /

"«tv'.w:v. .' *

' °^<X:^;^-^V

;::»1 3s

WiM

ingboro

^/^

-'-.Vi^

i:..*I

* "*V

-.;.-.».>.,v.1

a

*r#

>:;iv

*: ; '» }V^t1

"v .' *'"*"*-

HE

W

J' £B

S£V

"TURNPIKE

/\

'^o

Base from

U.S

. Geolo

gica

l Survey,

New

ark 1969

and Wilm

ing

ton

1972,

1:250 000.

5 MIL

ES

ii

I I

r i

01

2345 K

ILO

M E

TE

RS

15

-81

Modifie

d from

Fusillo and others (1

98

4).

EX

PLA

NA

TIO

N

OU

TC

RO

P O

F PO

TO

MA

C-R

AR

ITA

N-M

AG

OT

HY

AQ

UIF

ER

SY

ST

EM

WE

LL SA

MP

LED

FOR

WA

TE

R-Q

UA

LITY

A

NA

LYS

IS A

ND

LO

CA

L W

ELL N

UM

BE

R

TA

SK

ER

^OR

RIS

ST

RE

ET

S S

UM

P

Plate

1. L

ocatio

n o

t wells.