i ·inservice inspection group . sc.ra .. (q) .. 2

32
(.f) w C) z « I u o z « (.f) f- « f- (.f) z o (.f) > W 0:: C) Z >- lL.. 0:: W > 0:: o lL.. W -I OJ (.f) Z o 0... (.f) W 0:: 0:: W (.f) PSEG Internal Use Onlv PSEG NUCLEAR L.L.C Page i of.1 ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. Rev. 2 LEAKAGE MONITORING AND REDUCTION PROGRAM USE CATEGORY: II Biennial Review Performed: Yes No NA .... :f.. Packages and Affected Document Numbers incorporated into this revision: None CP No.: CP Rev.: AD No. Rev No. The following OTSCs were Incorporated into this revision: None REVISION SUMMARY The changes to this procedure are editorial in nature as defined in NC.DM-AP.ZZ w 0001 (Q) Revised purpose 8tep 1-.4 leakage limit from "3800 cc/hr" to "0.7 gpm (2600 cc/min)" in conjunction with LCR 803-05. This license change also results in revision of administrative limit from "2100 cc/hr" to "2300 cc/min" throughout procedure. Specific steps affected are Note;5.3.4.C, 5.3.4.D, 5.3.5, 5.3.6, and forms SC.RA-AP.ZZ-0051-1, 3 &4. Changed reference to "!SI and lSI/1ST" to "Engineering" throughout procedure to reflect organizational realignment. IMPLEMENTATION REQUIREMENTS Completion of LCR S03-05'(revision to UFSAR Section 6.3.2.11). Effective Date: Approved: 2. /07 Date . Engineering Programs Manager _i

Upload: others

Post on 16-Oct-2021

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

(.f) w C) z « I u o z « (.f) ~ f-« f-(.f)

z o (.f)

> W 0::

C) Z >-lL.. 0:: W > 0:: o lL..

W -I OJ (.f) Z o 0... (.f) W 0::

0:: W (.f) ~

PSEG Internal Use Onlv PSEG NUCLEAR L.L.C Page i of.1 ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP

. SC.RA .. AP.ZZ~0051 (Q) .. Rev. 2

LEAKAGE MONITORING AND REDUCTION PROGRAM

USE CATEGORY: II • Biennial Review Performed: Yes No NA ....:f.. • Packages and Affected Document Numbers incorporated into this revision: None

CP No.: CP Rev.: AD No. ~ Rev No. ~ • The following OTSCs were Incorporated into this revision: None

REVISION SUMMARY

• The changes to this procedure are editorial in nature as defined in NC.DM-AP.ZZw 0001 (Q)

• Revised purpose 8tep 1-.4 leakage limit from "3800 cc/hr" to "0.7 gpm (2600 cc/min)" in

conjunction with LCR 803-05. This license change also results in revision of administrative limit from "2100 cc/hr" to "2300 cc/min" throughout procedure. Specific

steps affected are Note;5.3.4.C, 5.3.4.D, 5.3.5, 5.3.6, and forms SC.RA-AP.ZZ-0051-1, 3

&4.

• Changed reference to "!SI and lSI/1ST" to "Engineering" throughout procedure to reflect organizational realignment.

IMPLEMENTATION REQUIREMENTS

Completion of LCR S03-05'(revision to UFSAR Section 6.3.2.11).

Effective Date:

Approved: 2. J~ /07

Date . Engineering Programs Manager

_i

Page 2: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

-

UI w C) z « ::r: u 0 z « UI ::J f-« f-UI

Z 0 UI > W 0:::

C) Z >-w... 0::: W > 0::: 0 w... W -1 CD UI Z 0 CL UI W 0:::

0::: i w , UI

::J

SECTION TITL,!:

S C .RA .. AP .ZZ-0051 (Q)

LEAKAGE MONITORING AND REDUCTION PROGRAM

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

1.0 PURPOSE,t ...... ,., .. ' .... ft~ ..... ~ •••••• II" ••• '",' ••• , •••••• '" ••••• ' ••••••••• , ••••••••••••• ' ••••• 11' ••••• , •• 1.""" ••• 1.12

2,0 SCOPE., ... t.".iltl.,., •••• I,' •• " ••• ,~.,.tl.,.i.t.".111 ••••••••• "." •••••••• ,.' •••••• ' •••• , •••••• " •••• ,',.illlll',f""I? 2

3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES .................................................................................................. 3

4.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................ 5

5.0 PROCEDURE ........ '11 ••••• 111'.11" •••• +'.11 •• , •••• '1' ••••• 1' ••• '., ••••• r'.'.' .... II •• ' •••• , ••••••••••• ,II ••••••• , •••• 5

5.1 Design Features to Minimize Leakage ....................................................................... 5

5.2 Design Features to Aid in Detection of Gross Leakage within the Containment Building ............ It •• "".a.tt •• ~. " ......... 11 •••••• , •••• 1 ,, ••••• " •••• , ••••••• , •• ' •• I.I., ••••• t.' •••• I ••••••• ' •• III'.~ ••• ,. 6

5.3 Periodic Leakage Tests and Corrective Action ........................................................... 6

5.4 Periodic Visual Inspections ...................................................................................... 12

6.0 DEFINITIONS ........................................................................................................... 13

7.0 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 13

ATTACHMENT

Attachment 1 Leak Rate Test Frequency .......................................................................... 16

FORMS

Form SC.RA-AP.ZZ-0051-1 Leak Rate Measurement Data Sheet - Water Filled Piping ......... 18

Form SC.RA-AP.zZ-0051-2 Leak Rate Measurement Data Sheet - Gas or Air Filled Piping ~.I.I •• III.'., •••.•••• , ... , •••....•• ~ ... f , ••••• i •••••••••••••••••••••• III •••• ,.lftl •• , ••• it. 22

Form SC.RA-AP.ZZ-0051-3 System Leakage Data Sheet ...................................................... 24

Form SC.RA-AP.ZZ-0051-4 Combined Leak Rate Data Sheet .............................................. 25

Salem Common Page 2 of ?tf!' 32. wOW t {S/011 Rev. 2

Page 3: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

-S C .RA"AP .ZZ·0051 (Q)

1.0 PURPOSE

1.1 This procedure provides a program for monitoring and reducing the leakage from systems outside Containment that could contain highly radioactive fluids following an

accident.

1.2 Establishes responsibilities for various elements of the program.

1.3 The objective of the program is to detect and correct any degradation of the pressure boundaries for these systems and thereby reduce post~accident dose rates

and airborne activity in the Auxiliary building in accordance with Technical Specification 6.8.4.a. This would also have the effect of reducing the amount of radioactivity released to the atmosphere through the Auxiliary Building Ventilation System following an accident.

1.4 To ensure compliance with 0,7 gpm (2600 cc/mln) limit as stated in the UFSAR Section 6.3.2.11, Leakage During Recirculation.

2.0 SCOPE

The ECCS Leakage Monitoring and Reduction Program covers the portions of the systems

listed below that are located outside of the primary containment that could be subject to

highly radioactive fluids during the recirculation phase of an accident. The scope does not

include the Containment isolation valves that are tested for leakage in accordance with

(/) 1 OCFR50, Appendix J. For those valves where the packing is not exposed to test pressure

t5 during 10CFR50, Appendix J testing, the valve packing shall be included in the Leakage

~ Monitoring and Reduction Program. The systems included in the Leakage Monitoring

G Program are: o z « (/) :::::J f---« f---(/)

z o (/)

> W 0:::

C) Z >-lL. 0::: W > 0::: o lL.

W -l co (/) z o [L (/) W 0:::

0::: W (/) :::::J

+ + + +

+ + + +

RHR from RH4s to the Containment Containment Spray from CS2s to the Containment High Head Safety Injection from SJ1 and SJ2 to the Containment Intermediate Head Safety Injection ~ Cold Leg and Hot Leg from SJ30 to the Containment cves . Charging and Seal Injection and Seal Return Liquid Waste Gaseous Waste PASS

Salem Common Rev. 2

Page 4: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

-

Vi W C') z « I U

o Z <{

Vi :::::) I-<{ I-Vi

z o Vi

:> w 0::

C') Z >-lL. 0:: W > 0:: o lL.

W -I m Vi z o rl. Vi W 0::

0:: W Vi :::::)

SC.RA"AP,ZZ-0051 (Q)

3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

3.1 The Manager Engineering Programs is overall responsible for the development and

maintenance of the program.

3.2 The Operations Manager or designee is responsible for:

• Reviewing any recommended changes to the scope of the Leakage Monitoring and

Reduction Program.

• Identifying those systems that require periodic testing in the Leakage Monitoring and

Reduction Program.

• General monitoring of the effectiveness of design features intended to minimize and

detect leakage.

• Assigning an individual to be the point of contact between Engineering and the station.

3.3 The Maintenance Manager is responsible for corrective and preventive maintenance

activities associated with the Leakage Monitoring and Reduction Program.

P.4 ' The Engineering Group Supervisor is responsible for corrective and preventive maintenance activities associated with the Leakage Monitoring and Reduction Program.

3.5 Eaoh System Engineer is responsible for:

o Reviewing the results of leak rate tests conducted on systems for whioh he/she has

cognizance.

o Initiating the necessary corrective actions.

3.6 The Shift Manager (SM)/Control Room Supervisor (eRS) is responsible for:

o Supporting periodic leakage tests.

o Ensuring that the required visual inspections are conducted.

o General monitoring of the effectiveness of design features Initiated to minimize

detectable leakage.

o Reviewing the results of the periodic monitoring to ensure that leakage is within

established limits.

o Initiating required corrective actions, as needed.

Salem Common Rev. 2

Page 5: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

V)

S C .RA·AP .ZZ·0051 (Q)

3.7 The Engineering Leakage Coordinator is responsible for:

o Evaluating all leak rate results and tracking the total leakage.

o Identifying those systems that require periodic testing in the Leakage Monitoring and Reduction Program.

o Ensure testing is conducted each refueling outage to establish new baseline leakage.

o Conducting periodic leakage tests on air/gas filled systems.

o Initiating required corrective actions as needed.

3.8 The Boric Acid Corrosion Management (BACM) Program Owner is responsible for ensuring the BorlcAcid Corrosion ManagementProgram requirements are satisfactorily implemented in accordance with SH.RA-AP.ZZ-8805(Q), Boric Acid Corrosion Management Program when boric acid leakage deposits are observed external of the system.

3.9 Planning and Scheduling Is responsible for schedUling periodic leakage tests of those systems in the Leakage Monitoring and Reduction Program and establishing the necessary FEG windows to ensure leakage is tracked and corrective actions are planned and scheduled.

t5 3.10 All Station Personnel are responsible for notifying their supervisor or the Shift ~ Manager (SM)/Control Room Supervisor (CRS), as appropriate, upon the discovery of any G equipment malfunctions. Equipment malfunctions shall Include leakage from the systems o covered by this Leakage Monitoring Program. z « (J) ::) f-« f-V)

z o (J)

> W 0:::

(') z >-LL 0::: W > 0::: o LL

W -.J m (J) z o D--(J) W 0:::

0::: W (J) ::)

Salem Common Page 5 of.26' ~1 Rev. 2

Page 6: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

-

(J) w l') z <r: I ()

o z <r: (J) ::::J f-<r: f-(J)

z o (J)

> W 0:::

l') Z >--1L. 0::: W > 0::: o 1L.

W ....J CO (J) Z o 0... (J) W 0:::

0::: LLi (J) ::::J

S C .RA·AP .ZZ-0051 (Q)

4.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION

4.1 The Leakage Monitoring and Reduction Program for systems outside of the Containment consists of the following elements:

• Design features to minimize leakage • Instrumentation to detect gross leakage (e.g., area radiation monitors and sump

level alarms) • Visual examination during system operatlon • Periodic leakage tests • Implementation of a vigorous corrective action program to correct leakage problems

once they have been identified • Preventive Maintenance Activities

4.2 These various elements are described within the procedure as they apply to the systems named in Section 2.0. Through the application of the requirements established in these elements, an effective Leakage Monitoring and Reduction Program will be maintained.

5.0 PROCEDURE

5.1 Design Features to Minimize Leakage

5.1.1.

A.

B.

C.

5.1.2.

The systems identified in Section 2.0 as being included in the Leakage Monitoring and Reduction Program incorporate the following design features and provisions to minimize leakage from the system boundary:

The pumps are provided with mechanical seals.

The piping is welded construction.

The boundaries of the systems are isolated by one of the following means:

• One normally closed manual valve (low pressure piping) • Two check valves • One remotely actuated valve and a check valve • Two remotely actuated valves • Two normally closed manual valves are included • One safety relief or rupture disk

These desIgn features and provisions should also be incorporated Into any design changes made to the system covered by this program.

Salem Common ~) (j.::61V . Page 6 of ~ ~15ID'" Rev. 2

Page 7: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

I/l W o Z « I U

S C .RA·AP .ZZ .. 0051 (Q)

5.2 Design Features to Aid in Detection of Gross Leakage within the Containment Building

5.2.1. Gross leakage from high temperature radioactive systems such as eves and RHR is detected by Containment Atmosphere Particulate Radiation Monitoring, Containment Sump Level Monitoring System, and either the Containment Fan Cooler Condensate Flowrate or the Containment Gaseous Radiation Monitoring System.

5.3 Periodic Leakage Tests and Corrective Action

NOTE

Tests required by Section 5.3 meet all requirements of the Service Pressure Leak Tests of Technical Specification 6.8.4.a(li).

5.3.1. The SM/CRS conducts periodic leakage tests using the recurring task function of SAP in accordance with NC.WM·AP.ZZ~0003(Q), Regular Maintenance Process. Attachment 1 (Leak Rate Test Frequency) contains the test frequency for each test.

5.3.2. The tests shall be conducted for baseline data to be used in calculating total combined leak rate in accordance with paragraph 5.3.4.B.

5.3.3. A separate activity is generated every 92 days describing the need to perform leakage walkdowns. For example, Activity 1 would be the quarterly inservice test for the specific loop; Activity 2 would be the system walkdown.

~ NME « ~ ,Attachment 1 lists associated activities. These procedures are recommended for pressurizing ~ piping; however, they are not mandatory If equivalent procedures are available. f-I/l

z 5.3.4. Shift Manager (SM)/Control Room Supervisor (CRS) o I/l ~ A. Prepares prerequisites for tests in accordance with the Prerequisite section of: Cl::

o z >-LL Cl:: W > Cl:: o LL

W -.J m I/l z o 0... I/l W Cl::

Cl:: W I/l ~

• •

Form SC.RA-AP.ZZ-0051-1, Leak Rate Measurement Data Sheet - Water Filled Piping Form SC.RA-AP.ZZ-0051-2, Leak Rate Measurement Data Sheet - Gas Filled Piping

Salem Common ~~

Page 7 ofa5 WOo:> Z{S{07 Rev. 2

Page 8: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

(j) w (') z « ::r: u o z « (j) :::::) f---« f---(j)

z o (j)

> W 0:::

(') Z >-L<-0::: W > 0::: o L<-

W --1 CD (j) Z o lL (j) W 0:::

0::: W (j) :::::)

5.3.4

B.

C.

S C .RA-AP .ZZ~0051 (Q)

(Cont'd)

Ensures quarterly leak rate tests are conducted in accordance with the applicable steps of Form SC.RA-AP.ZZ-0051-1 or SC.RA-AP.ZZ-0051 .. 2, as applicable. All identified leaks and corrective actions should be documented on Form SC.RA-AP .ZZ-0051-3.

After completion, forwards the completed System Leakage Data Sheet Form (Form SC.RA-AP.ZZ..;0051w1 or SC.RA-AP.ZZ-0051-2, and SC.RA-AP.ZZ-0051-3) to the Engineering Leakage Monitoring Coordinator.

NOTE

Exceeding the 2300 cc/min total leakage limit may result in exceeding GOC-19 limits for Control Room habitability. Prompt action should be taken to reduce total leakage to less than 2300 cc/min.

D.

E.

The Engineering Leakage Coordinator should review the supplied system leakage results contained on Form SC.RA-AP.ZZ-0051-3 and sum the results of the total system leakages lAW with the following guidance and notify the 8M/eRS If the leakage exceeds 2300 cc/min.

For RHR pump 405p surveillance testing, the following should be monitored/walked down:

_45' Aux Building

• All RHR piping valves, pumps, floor drains, heat exchangers (both 11 and 12 bays for U1 RHR 405p's and 21 and 22 bays for U2 RHR 405p's)

_11/21 RHR Sump (valve leakoff lines, drains, vents). This will require the hinged sump covers to be opened. If no leakage Is going into the sump, consider It zero leakage. Attempt to trace and quantify any leakage.

• 3/4"line (11/21RH18 AND 19, 2RH20) + 3/4" line (11/21 RHR pump drain line, 11/21 RH1 0,12 and 14) • 211 line (11/21RH4) + 3/4" line (11/21 RHR HX drain) • 3/4" line (11/21 RHR pump vent)

S~lem Common Page 8 of 28 32- Rev. 2

Page 9: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

-

(J) w C..? z « :r: u o z « (J) :::J f-« f-(J)

z o (J)

> W 0:::

C..? Z >-LL 0::: W > 0::: o LL

W -1 m (J) z o CL (J) W 0:::

0::: W (J) :::J

S C .RA·AP .ZZ-0051 (Q)

E. (Cont'd)

_12/22 RHR Sump (valve leakoff lines, drains, vents). This will require the hinged sump covers to be opened. If no leakage is going into the sump, consider it zero leakage. Attempt to trace and quantify any leakage.

+ 2" line (12/22 RHR HX drain) + 3/4" line (12/22 RHR pump drain, 12/22EH 10, 12 and 14) + 2" line (1/2RH21, 12/22RH4, 12/22 RHR pump vent) + 3/4" line (12/22RH18 and 19)

.-55' Aux Building

• 11/21 RHR valve room (11/21 RH4 and any RHR piping)

_55' Aux Building

+ 12122 RHR valve room (12/22RH4, 1/2RH21 and any RHR piping)

_78' Aux Building .. IPA Mechanical Penetration

• RHR common hot leg piping up to CAN wall)

_BIT Room

+ RHR piping up to the CS36's

_51 Pump Rooms (both)

• RHR piping up to the SJ45's

_Aux Building Sump (recorder in C/R)

• Trend tank levels prior to, during and upon completion of 405p's • Applicable valve leakoff lines ·11/12/21/22 SJ69, 11/12/21/22C836

_Waste Hold Up Tank (recorder in C/R)

• • Trend tank levels prior to, during and upon completion of 405p's Applicable valve leakoff lines - 11/12/21/22 SJ45

F. For 81 pump 405 surveillance testing, the following should be monitored/walked down:

_84' Aux Building

• Both 81 pump rooms (81 piping, valves, pumps and floor drains)

_BIT Upper Room

Salem Common ,1- (.DOw

Page 9 of ~ ttt~ lo'7 Rev. 2

Page 10: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

(f) w C) z « ::r: o o z « (f) :::::> f-« f-(f)

z o (f)

> W et:

C) Z >-LL n:: W > n:: o LL

W .-J m (f) z o 0... (f) W n:: et: W (f) :::::>

• 81 piping up to the SJ40's • Past SJ134's and 1/2SJ135 up to CAN wall

Salem Common Page 10 of ~ t>~

S C .RA-AP .ZZ-0051 (Q)

Rev. 2

Page 11: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

(J) W (') z « I ()

o z « (J) ::::l I-« I-(J)

z o (J)

:> 'W

0:::

(') Z >--lL. 0:::. W > 0::: o lL.

W .....J m (J) z o Q (J) W 0:::

0::: W (j) ::::l

S C .RA·AP .ZZ .. 0051 (Q)

F. (Cont'd)

_84' Aux Building

• Valve room behind 11/21 CC HX (SJ33's up to SJ113's)

_78' Mechanical Penetration

• SI piping, valves and floor drains

_Aux Building Sump (recorder in C/R)

• Trend tank levels prior to, during and upon completion of 405p's • Applicable valve leakoff lines ~ SJ40's, 1 12SJ 135, SJ 134'8

_Waste Hold Up Tank (recorder in C/R)

• Trend tank levels prior to, during and upon completion of 405p's • Applicable valveleakoff lines - SJ135'S, SJ45's, SJ33's, 1/2SJ30,

SJ113'S, SJ65's

G. For CVC pump 405p surveillance testing, the following should be monitored/walked down:

_HHSI Flow

+ BIT Room - Lower Level (SJ4 and 5)

_Recirculation Flow

+ 841 Aux Building pump areas (all 3 CV pumps), CVC valve alley, entrance to seal water HX room (1/2CV139, 140,126 and 129)

• 100' Aux Building valve room at BAT pumps (1/2CV197), and accessible piping to VCT on 122' Aux Building

_Normal Charging

• 84' Aux Building pump areas (all 3 CV pumps), CVC valve alley, 78' mechanical penetration (SGBD HX area -1/2CV71, 1/2CV68), up to CAN wall

_Seal Injection

• 84' Aux Building pump areas (all 3 ev pumps), cve piping near seal water filter area, 78' mechanical penetration (SGSD HX area), 4 Rep seal injection lines up to CAN wall

_Waste Hold Up Tank (recorder in CfR)

• Trend tank levels prior to, during and upon completion of 405p's

Salem Common Page 11 of 26' ~ 1- ~(sIO '7 Rev. 2

Page 12: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

if) W C) Z <t :r: U

o Z <t if) :J f-<t f-if)

z o if)

> W Ck:

C) Z >-LL Ck: W > Ck: o LL

W -1 m if) z o CL if) W Ck:

Ck: W if) :J

S C .RA-AP .ZZ-0051 (Q)

• Applicable valve leakoff lines p 1 12CV44 , 49, 81,48,82,53,55, 56, 54,71 and 95

Salem Common Rev. 2

Page 13: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

(J) w C') z « I u o z « (J) :::::l I-« I-(J)

z o (J)

> W 0::

C') Z >-lL. 0:: W > 0:: o lL.

W -I m (J) z o (l. (J) W 0::

0:: W (J) :::::l

S C .RA .. AP .ZZ-0051 (Q)

5.3.5. Engineering Leakage Coordinator should review system leakage trends and evaluate the need for additional preventive maintenance activities for recurring leaks or need for increased test frequency:

A. Evaluate completed leakage test results as follows:

1. Compare total system leakage with previous results as recorded on the most recent Combined Leakage Data Sheet (Form 8C.RA-AP.ZZ-0051~4).

2. Ensure total combined ECCS leakage, does not exceed the 2300 co/min limit.

3. Immediately NOTIFY the SM/eRS if combined ECCS leakage exceeds 2300 cc/min. If the total combined ECCS leakage does not exceed 2300 cclmin advise the SM/CRS of the current limit reached and continue monitoring

4. If the total combined leakage exceeds 2300 cc/min then initiate a Notification lAW NC.WM-AP.ZZ~OOOO(Q) describing the condition.

5. Ensure that copies of the current Combined Leak Rate Data Sheets (Form SC.RA-AP.ZZ-0051-4), are filed in the appropriate Control Room.

B. If the SM/CRS is notified by the Engineering Leakage Coordinator that the total combined leakage exceeds 2300 cc/min, then the 8M/CRS should perform the following:

• •

Attempts to reduce leakage to less than 2300 cc/min (e.g., adjust valve packing, isolate components).

If isolation is required, refers to the following Technical Specifications:

• • • • • •

• • •

3.1.2.1, Boration Systems - Flow Paths - Shutdown 3.1.2.2, Boration Systems - Flow Paths - Operating 3.1.2.3, Charging Pump M Shutdown 3.1.2.4, Charging Pump" Operating 3.4.1.3, Reactor Coolant System - Shutdown 3;5.2, Emergency Core Coaling Systems - EGGS SUbsystems.:. Tav9 ;:.:350° F 3.5.3, Emergency Core Goaling Systems - EGCS Subsystems ri

Tavg <350° F 3.6.2.1, Depressurization and Cooling Systems - Containment Spray System 3.6.2.2, Depressurization and Cooling System - Spray Additive System If isolation of components falls outsIde the actions of the above limiting Conditions for Operation, then refer to Technical Specification 3.0.3, Limiting Conditions for Operation and Surveillance Requirements - Applicability.

Salem Common Page 13 of'Jt6 32, Rev. 2

Page 14: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

(f) w (9 z « :r: o o z « (f) ::) f---« f---(f)

z Q (f)

> W 00::

(9 Z >--lL,

00:: W > 00:: o lL,

W .--1 CD (f) Z o (L (f) W 00::

00:: W (f) =>

SC,RA-AP,ZZ .. 0051{Q)

B. (Cont'd)

+ Request Design Engineering to PERFORM the following:

• DETERMINE if the ECCS leakage outside containment remains within the LOCA dose consequence analysis assumptions.

• IF the ECCS leakage outside containment indicate LOCA dose consequence analysis assumptions are exceeded, THEN NOTIFY the SM/CRS of the results.

• REFER to Emergency Condition Guidelines, EAL 11.2. 1.a or 11.2.2.b, as applicable.

+ Ensures that copies of the current Combined Leak Rate Data Sheets (Form SC.RA~AP.ZZ~0051-4), are filed in the appropriate Control Rooms.

5.3.6. Engineering Leakage Monitoring Coordinator:

A. Ensures testing is conducted each refueling to establish new baseline leakage.

B. Evaluates completed leakage test results as follows:

1. Compares total system leakage with previous results as recorded on the most recent Combined Leakage Data Sheet (Form 8C.RA-AP.zZ-D051-4).

2.

3.

Ensures any increase, when added to the last combined ECCS leakage, shall not result In exceeding the 2300 cc/min limit.

Immediately notifies 8M/CRS if combined ECCS leakage exceeds 2300 co/min.

C. Forwards copies of the updated data sheets to the responsible Engineer in System

Engineering.

D. ENSURE Notifications are initiated and action taken to track Corrective Maintenance

Orders to completion AND ENSURE corrected leakages are subtracted from the total.

E. Completes a new Combined Leak Rate Data Sheet (Form SC.RA-AP.ZZ-0051-4) using the most recent test data and maintain a copy In the respective Control Rooms.

Salem Common Page 14 of ~ ,2- Rev. 2

Page 15: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

(J) w (') Z « ::r:: u o z « (J) :::::J

.f-« f-(J)

z o i7l > W 00::

(')

~. >--LL 00:: W > 00:: o LL

Ld ~ CO (J) Z o [L (J) W 00::

00:: W (J) :::::J

SC .RA·AP .ZZ-0051 (Q)

5.3.6 (Cont'd)

NOTE

After new combined leak rate test data (Form SC.RA-AP.ZZ~0051~4), has been obtained and evaluated, completed Forms 8C.RA-AP.ZZ-0051-1 through SC.RA-AP.ZZ-0051~3, used to collect previous Form 8C.RA-AP.zZ-0051-4 data, may be destroyed.

F. Maintains files of current Form SC.RA-AP.ZZ-0051-4 data.

G. Forwards previous Form SC.RA .. AP.ZZ-0051-4 data to TDR lAW NC.NA-AP.ZZ .. 0011(Q), Records Management Program.

5.4 Periodic Visual Inspections

5.4.1. On a periodic basis, the duty NEO ensures that visual inspections are conducted during normal rounds to identify leaks for those systems listed in Section 2.0.

5.4.2. When leaks are found, the 8M/CR8 ensures an Notification is initiated in accordance with NC.WM-AP.ZZ-OOOO(Q), Notification Process, and the leaks are quantified and documented in accordance with the applicable steps of Form SC.RA~AP.ZZ-0051-1 or SC.RA-AP.ZZ-0051-2.

5.4.3. CONTACT System Engineering to evaluate excessive leakage.

END OF PROCEDURE SECTION

Salem Common Page 15 of ~ 3"b Rev. 2

Page 16: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

U) W (') Z « I U

o Z « Ul :=J f-« f-Ul

z o Ul > W cr: (') z >-. LL cr: W > cr: o LL

W -.J m Ul Z o 0... Ul W cr: cr: w Ul :=J

S C .RA·AP .ZZ .. 0051 (Q)

6.0 DEFINITIONS

J:!nglneering Leakage Coordinator - An individual in Engineering Is responsible for maintaining records generated by this program.

7.0 REFERENCES

7.1 Technical Specifications

7.1.1.3.0.3, Limiting Conditions for Operation and Surveillance Requirements -Applicability

7.1.2.3.1.2.1, Baration Systems - Flow Paths - Shutdown 7.1.3.3.1.2.2, Boratian Systems ~ Flow Paths - Operating 7.1.4.3.1.2.3, Charging Pump" Shutdown 7.1.5. 3.1.2.2, Charging Pump - Operating 7.1.6.3.4.1.3, Reactor Coolant System - Shutdown 7.1.7.3.5.2, Emergency Core Cooling Systems. EGGS Subsystems - T avg ;?: 3500 F 7.1.8.3.5.3, Emergency Core Cooling Systems - ECCS Subsystems - T avg < 3500 F 7.1.9.3.6.2.1, Depressurization and Cooling Systems - Containment Spray System 7.1.10.3.6.2.2, Depressurization and Cooling System - Spray Additive System 7.1.11. 6.8.4.a - Primary Coolant Sources Outside Containment

7.2 UFSAR

7.2.1. UFSAR Section 6.3.2.11 - Emergency Core Cooling System - System Reliability 7.2.2. UFSAR Table 6.3-12 - Recirculation Loop Leakage 7.2.3. UFSAR Section 15.4.1.8.4 - Condition IV - Limiting Faults - Cases Analyzed

7.3 OTHER

7.3.1. S-C-PAS-MEE-1132, Post Accident Sampling System Ventilation System 7.3.2. S-G-ZZ-MEE-0998 M Engineering Evaluation Acceptable Mechanical Seal Leakage

Rate - Salem Unit 1 &2 Pumps 7.3.3. Emergency Condition Guidelines

Salem Common Page 16 of 2(f 3't Rev, 2

Page 17: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

(/) w (? z « ::c u o z « (/) :::J f-« f-(/)

z o (/)

> LLJ et:: (? Z >-LL et:: LLI > et:: o LL

W .-J m (/) z

·0 [L (/) W et::

Ct: W (/) :::J

S C .RA .. AP .ZZ-0051 (Q)

7.4 Drawings

7.4.1. 205228 Unit 1 Chemical & Volume Control Operation 7.4.2.205232 Unit 1 Residual Heat Removal 7.4.3.205234 Unit 1 Safety Injection 7.4.4.205235 Unit 1 Containment Spray 7.4.5.205239 Unit 1 Waste Disposal Liquid 7.4.6.205240 Unit 1 Waste Disposal Gas 7.4.7.205244 Unit 1 Sampling 7.4.8.205328 Unit 2 Chemical & Volume Control Operation 7.4.9.205332 Unit 2 Residual Heat Removal 7.4.10.205334 Unit 2 Safety Injection 7.4.11.205335 Unit 2 Containment Spray 7.4.12. 205339 Unit 2 Waste Disposal Liquid 7.4.13.205340 Unit 2 Waste Disposal Gas 7.4.14. 205344 Unit 2 Sampling

7.5 Cross References

7.5.1. 7.5.2, 7.5.3. 7.5.4. 7.5.5. 7.5.6. 7.5.7. 7.5.B. 7.5.9. 7,5.10,

7.5.11.

7.5.12.

7.5.13.

7.5.14.

7.5.15,

7.5.16.

7.5.17.

7.5.18.

NC.WM-AP.ZZ-OOOO(Q) ~ Notification Process NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0011 (Q) - Records Management Program NC.WM-AP.ZZ-0001 (Q) - Work Management Process NC.WM-AP.ZZ-0003(Q) - Regular Maintenance Process NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0027(Q) -Inservice Inspection Program S1.0P-SO.CVC-0001(Q) - Charging, Letdown, and Seal Injection S2.0P-SO.CVC-0001 (Q) - Charging, Letdown, and Seal Injection S1.0P-SO.WL-0004(Q) - Waste Holdup Tank Operation S2.0P-SO.WL-0004(Q) - Waste Holdup Tank Operation S1.0P-ST.CS-0005(Q) - In Service Testing Containment Spray Pump Full Flow Test and Containment Spray Check Valves S2.0P-ST.CS-0005(Q) - In Service Testing Containment Spray Pump Full Flow Test and Containment Spray Check Valves S1.0P·ST.RHR-0005(Q) -In Service Testing Residual Heat Removal Valves and Orifices S2.0P-ST.RHR-0005(Q) -In Service Testing Residual Heat Removal Valves and Orifices S1.0P-ST.SJ-0014(Q) - Intermediate Head· Cold Leg Throttling Valve Flow Balance Verification S2.0P-ST.SJ-0014(Q) - Intermediate Head - Cold Leg Throttling Valve Flow Balance Verification S1.0P-ST.SJ-0015(Q) - Intermediate Head - Hot Leg Throttling Valve Flow Balance Verification S2.0P-ST.SJ-0015(Q) -Intermediate Head - Hot Leg Throttling Valve Flow Balance Verification S1.0P-ST.SJ-0016(Q) - High Head - Cold Leg Throttling Valve Flow Balance Verification

Salem Common Page 17 o~?~ Rev. 2

Page 18: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

V) w G Z <C I ()

o Z <C V) :::::J f----<C f----Ul

z o Ul > W 00::

G Z >-LL 00:: W > 00:: o LL

W ----1 CD V) Z o (L V) W 0:::

00:: W V) :::::J

SC .RA-AP .ZZ-0051 (Q)

7.5 Cross ReferencQ!), (Cont'd)

7.5.19.

7.5.20. 7.5.21. 7.5.22.

7.5.23. 7.5.24.

S2.0PMST.SJ-0016(Q) - High Head - Cold Leg Throttling Valve Flow Balance Verification S1.RA-IS.WG-0003(Q) - Waste Gas System Integrated Leak Rate Testing S2.RA-IS.WG-0003(Q) - Waste Gas System Integrated Leak Rate Testing SH.RA~IS.ZZ-0005(Q), VT-2 Examination of Nuclear Class 1, 2, and 3 Systems S-C-ZZ-MDC-1B07 - Loss Of Coolant Accident Radiological Consequences SH.RA .. AP.ZZ-8B05, Boric Aoid Corrosion Management Program

7.6 Applicable Procedur!§

7.6.1. S1.0P-ST.RHR-0001 (0) .. Inservioe Testlng-11 Residual Heat Removal Pump 7.6.2. S1.0P-ST.RHR-0002(0) - Inservice Testlng-12 Residual Heat Removal Pump 7.6.3. S2.0P-ST.RHR-0001 (Q) -Inservice Testing-21 Residual Heat Removal

Pump 7.6.4. S2.0P-ST.RHR-0002(0) -Inservice Testing-22 Residual Heat Removal

Pump 7.6.5. S1.0P-ST.SJ-0001 (0) .. Inservice Testing-11 Safety Injection Pump 7.6.6. S1.0P-ST.SJ-0002(0) .. Inservioe Testing-12 Safety Injection Pump 7.6.7. S2.0P-ST.SJ-0001 (0) - Inservice Testing-21 Safety Injection Pump 7.6.8. S2.0P';ST.SJ-0002(Q) -Inserviae Testing-22 Safety Injection Pump 7.6.9. S1.0P-ST.CVC-0003(Q) - Inserviae Testlng-11 Charging Pump 7.6.10. S1.0P-ST.CVC-0004(Q) .. Inservice Testing-12 Charging Pump 7.6.11. S1.0P-ST.CVC-0005(Q) .. Inssrvics Testing-13 Charging Pump 7.6.12. S2.0P-ST.CVC-0003(Q) - Inservics Testing-21 Charging Pump 7.6.13. S2.0P-ST.CVC-0004(Q) -Inservios Tssting-22 Charging Pump 7.6.14. S2.0P-ST.CVC-0005(Q) .. Inservlce Testing-23 Charging Pump

Salem Common Page 1 B of p6 ~'z, Rev. 2

Page 19: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES

i I ~

SYSTENUSUBSYSTEM

11(21} Cont. Spray Loop * i !

12(22) Cont. Spray Loop *

i

11(21) RHR Loop *

12(22) RHR Loop *

High Head Safety Injection *

Intermediate Head Safety Injection-Cold Leg *

[Intermediate Head Safety Injection-. Hot Leg_ *

eves Charging *

I

Salem Common

I

ATTACHMENT 1 (Page 1 of2)

LEAK RATE TEST FREQUENCY ------- -- ---------- --_.- - --- ----- - --

TEST RESPONSIBLE FREQ ORGANIZATION PROCEDURE

Refueling Engineering S 1 (2).OP-ST .CS-0005(Q)/ SH.RA-IS.ZZ-0005(Q)

Refueling Engineering S1 (2).OP-ST.CS-0005(Q)/ SH.RA-lS.ZZ-0005(Q)

Refueling Engineering S1(2).OP-ST.RHR-0005(Q)1 SH.RA-IS.ZZ-0005(Q)

Refueling Engineering S1 (2).OP-ST .RHR-0005(Q)/ SH.RA-IS.ZZ-0005{Q)

Refueling Engineering S 1 (2).OP-ST .SJ-0016(Q)1 SH.RA-IS.ZZ-0005(Q)

Refueling Engineering S1 (2).OP-ST.SJ-0014(Q)1 SH.RA-IS.ZZ-0005(Q)

Refueling Engineering S1{2).OP-ST.SJ-0015(Q)1 SH.RA-IS.ZZ-0005(Q)

SC.SA-AP.ZZ-0051 {Q}

-

I

P&ID I I

205235/205335 I I

I

205235/205335 I

I 2052321205332. I 2052321205332

205234/205334 I

205234/205334 I

J !

205234/205334

Refueling Engineering S1 (2).OP-ST.CVC-0003(4)(5)(Q 2052281205328 )f SH.RA-IS.ZZ-DOO5{Q)

Page 19 of~ 32 ~ z/!I'ft7 Rev. 2

---------. .~-----.--

I

Page 20: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES

SC .SA-AP ZZ-0051 (Q)

* Any leakage observed during quarterly 1ST runs will be quantified in accordance with this procedure and documented in the Comments section of the associated procedure.

Salem Common Page20of~3Z ~rf7 Rev. 2

Page 21: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES

*

---------

SYSTENUSUBSYSTEM

eves Seal Injection/Seal Return *

Waste Gas

Waste Liquid

PASS

ATTACHMENT 1 (page 2 of 2)

SC .SA-AP .ZZ-0051 {Q}

LEAK RATE TEST FREQUENCY ----- ------- _ .. _-------_ .. _-- -~

TEST RESPONSiBLE FREQ ORGANIZATION PROCEDURE P&ID

Refueling Engineering S 1 (2).OP-ST.CVC-0003(4 )(5)(Q 205228/205328 )/ SH. RA-IS.ZZ -OO05(Q)

Refueling Engineering SC.SS-IS. WG-0003(Q)/ 205240/205340 SH.RA-IS.ZZ-0005{Q)

Refueling Engineering S 1 (2).OP-SO.WL-0004(Q)1 205239/205339 SH.RA-IS.zz-0005(Q)

Refueling Engineering SC.CH-TI.PAS-1 070(Q)! 205244/205344 SH.RA-IS.ZZ-0005(Q)

Any leakage observed during quarterly 1ST runs will be quantified in accordance with this procedure and documented in the Comments Section of the associated procedure.

Salem Common Page 21 of~ 32 ~ 2/5107 Rev. 2

Page 22: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

(f) w () z « ::c u o z « (f) =:> I-« I-(f)

z o (f)

> w cr: C) z >-lL..

cr: W > cr: o

A. System/Subsystem

B. Work Order No.

C. . Prerequ isites

FORM SC.RA-AP.ZZ·0051-1 (Page 1 of 4)

SC.SA-AP,ZZ-0051(Q}

LEAK RATE MEASUREMENT DATA SHEET WATER FILLED PIPING

1. Coordinate with Engineering personnel to place systems In service for the baseline leakage walkdown.

NOTE

The piping tested by this procedure contains potentially contaminated radioactive fluids.

2. Contact RP for any additional precautions or equipment requirements.

3. The system/subsystem is operating in accordance with procedure number

4.

Rev.

Piping outside the containment is pressurized up to and including containment isolation valves.

lL.. D. Procedure w -l m (f) z o 0... (f) W cr: cr: w (f) =:>

Salem Common Page 22 of?i '31 Rev. 2

Page 23: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

(/) w C) z <t I U

o z <t IJl :::) I-<t l-(/)

z o IJl > w ~

C) Z >---LL ~ W > ~ o LL

W ----1 m IJl Z o (L (/) W ~

~ W (/) :::)

SC .SA·AP .ZZ-0051 (Q)

1. System walkdowns consist of touring each room outside Containment that has piping associated with the system being evaluated and examining for leakage. In each room, first check the floors and walls for evidence of gross leakage (puddles or streams of water) before proceeding to all areas of the room. The piping In the room should be scanned for potential leakage paths such as valve stems, valve bonnet joints, pump seals, pump casing joints and flanged connections.

2. Record leak rates on a System Leakage Data Sheet (Form SC.RA-PA.ZZ-0051-3) and attach to this data sheet.

Salem Common Rev. 2

Page 24: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

Ul W C) Z <{ I U

o z <{

Ul ::::J I-<{ I-Ul

z o Ul > w ex:: C) Z >--lL. ex:: W > ex:: o lL.

W ---l m Ul Z o D--Ul W ex:: ex:: w Ul ::::J

S C .SA·AP .ZZ-0051 (Q)

FORM SC.RA .. AP.ZZ·0051·1 (Page 2 of 4)

LEAK RATE MEASUREMENT DATA SHEET WATER FILLED PIPING

3. Use the following criteria to determine leak rates:

a. Measurements shall be in containers graduated in cc (cubic centimeters) or ml (milliliters).

b. If a leak Is inaccessible for collecting leakage, use estimates where 20 drops/minute equals 1 co/min.

c. Measurements or estimates shall be over a period of at least one minute using a stopwatch or equivalent.

4. The system is operating at greater than minimum baseline discharge pressure (refer to pump baseline data sheets) as indicated on the following instruments:

PARAMETER (circle one) INSTRUMENT VALUE

Suction/Discharge pslg

Suction/Discharge psig

Suction/Discharge psig

Suction/Discharge psig

Suction/Discharge psig

Suction/Discharge psig

Salem Common Page 24 of ~ 7'2 Rev. 2

Page 25: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

(J). w C.9 Z <C :r:: u o Z <C (J) :::::J f--<C f--(J)

z o !fl > w ex:: C.9 z >-l<-ex:: w > ex:: o l<-

W ---I m (J) Z o 0.-(J) W ex:: ex:: w (J) :::::J

SC.SA .. AP.ZZ-0051(Q) .

FORM SC.RA .. AP .ZZ-0051 .. 1 (Page 3 of 4)

LEAK RATE MEASUREMENT DATA SHEET WATER FILLED PIPING

5. Evaluate all recorded leaks and take corrective action where required. Corrective action shall be lAW NC.WM-AP.ZZ~0001(Q) via plant maintenance order. The following guidelines should be used in making this determination (based on leak rates exceeding the indicated value in cc/minute):

NOTE

Immediate corrective action must be completed as soon as possible and acceptable as-left

data recorded before concluding this test for MAJOR LEAKS.

Corrective action shall, as a minimum, reduce the leak to a MINOR leak category.

Leak rate below the MINOR LEAK criteria does not require corrective action.

LEAKAGE SOURCE MAJOR LEAK MINOR LEAK

Valve Stem 10 cc/in. valve diameter 1 cclin. valve diameter

Pump Seal 200 cc 20 cc

Vent or Drain Valve 50 cc/in. valve diameter 5cc/in. valve diameter

Pump Casing 50 cc 5 cc

Valve Bonnet Joint 50 cc 5 cc

PipinQ Flange 50 cc 5cc

Other (fittings, etc.) 20 co 2 cc

6. Using the System Leakage Data Sheet (Form SC.RA-AP.ZZ-0051-3), add all recorded leak rates and enter the total:

___ cc/min I

7. Sign and date below indicating completion of this test.

Reviewed: .......... __ --::-:~"'=-:' ___ -- Date: 8M/CRS

Salem Common Page 25 of~ ~1 IP'w1;t~to1 Rev. 2

Page 26: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

(f) w C) z « I U

o z « (f) =:> I-« I-(f)

z o (f)

> W Do::

C) Z >-LL Do:: W > Do:: o LL

W -I CO (f) Z o [L (f) W Do::

ex:: w (f) =:>

S C .SA·AP .ZZ·0051 (Q)

8.' Submit this data sheet, with attached System Leakage Data Sheet(s), to the Engineering Leakage Coordinator.

Salem Common Page 26 of " ~~ Rev. 2

Page 27: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

Ul w G Z « ::r:: u o z « Ul =:J f-« f-Ul

z o Ul > W 00::

G Z >-LL 00:: W > 00:: o LL

W --.J m Ul Z o Q Ul W 00::

00:: W Ul =:J

SC.SAMAP,ZZ"0051(Q)

FORM SC.~A·AP.ZZ .. 0051·1 (Page 4 of 4)

LEAK RATE MEASUREMENT DATA SHEET WATER FILLED PIPING

9. Record any additional action taken or pertinent comments (Le., revisions to the Preventive Maintenance Program, etc.)

Signature: Date: Engineering Leakage Coordinator

Salem Common Page 27 of;6 92 Rev. 2

Page 28: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

-

(j) w C5 Z <{ I U

FORM SC.FiA .. AP.ZZ·0051-2 (Page 1 of 2)

S C .SA·AP .ZZ·0051 (Q)

LEAK RATE MEASUREMENT DATA SHEET GAS FILLED PIPING

(Test Frequency .. Refueling)

A. System/Subsystem

B. Work Order No.

C. Prerequisites

1. Coordinate with Engineering personnel to place systems in service for baseline leakage walkdown.

NOTE

The piping tested by this procedure contains potentially contaminated radioactive gases.

2. Contact RP for any additional precautions or equipment requirements.

3. The system/subsystem is under test pressure using a station approved Type C leak test procedure f or equivalent, in accordance with NC.NA~AP.ZZ~0027(Q}, lnservice Inspection Program.

Procedure Number: ___________ Rev.

o z D. Procedure <{

(j) ::> f--<{ f--

. (j)

z o !fl > W 0::

C5 Z >-l!.-0:: W > 0:: o l!.-

W -I OJ (j) Z o 0.-(j) W 0::

0:: .w (j) ::>

1. While maintaining test pressure, examine all potential leakage paths to atmosphere such as valve stems, pump seals, vents, drains, pump casing joints, valve bonnet joints, and flanged connections .

2. Record all leakage paths on a System Leakage Data Sheet (Form SC. RA·AP .Z2-0051-3) and attach it to this data sheet.

Salem Common Page 28 ot21f j:2 Rev. 2

7

Page 29: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

-

(/) w c..? z <{ ::r: u o z <{

(/) :::::l I-<{ l-(/)

z o (/)

> W 0:-:

c..? Z >-LL 0:-: W > 0:-: o LL

W ....J m (/) z o 0... (/) W 0:-:

0:-: W IJ) :::::l

FORM SC.RA·AP.iZ .. 0051·2 (Page 2 of 2)

5 C .SA·AP .ZZ·0051 (Q)

LEAK RATE MEASUREMENT DATA SHEET GAS FILLED PIPING

(Test Frequency. Refueling)

3. Use the following criteria to locate and categorize leaks:

a. Locate leaks by using "snoop" soap solution or by audible Indication.

b. Categorized identified leaks as:

Major: Where there is audible indication to the unaided ear from within one foot of the leak.

Minor: Where soap bubbles form and carry away and/or burst at a steady rate while applying IIsnoop" solution.

4. Attempt to isolate all recorded leaks and take corrective action where required.

6.

6.

7.

Corrective action shall be in accordance with NC.WM-AP.ZZ-0001(Q), Work Management Process.

Sign and date below indicating completion of this test.

Reviewed: ___ -:-:-~~ ___ -- Date: SM/eRS

Submit this data sheet, with attached System Leakage Data Sheets, to the Engineering Leakage Monitoring and Reduction Coordinator.

Record any additional action taken or pertinent comments (I.e., revisions to the Regular Maintenance Process, etc.)

S Ig n atu re: __ -:=----:-_-:----:---:-__ --::-_-::-' Date: Engineering Leakage Coordinator

Salem Commc;m Page 29 of ~3Z. fI'O~15 ]01 Rev. 2

Page 30: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES

COMPONENT {Le., valve xxx packing, pump xxxx seal,

flange xxxx, etc.)

FORM SC.RA-AP.ZZ-0051-3 (Page 1 of 1)

SYSTEM LEAKAGE DATA SHEET

System:

Work Order No:

Date Started:

Date Completed:

LEAK RATE fcc/min} * + MEASURE METHOD USED

ACTUAL I ESTIMATED

SC .RA-AP .ZZ-0051 (Q)

COMMENTS/CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN

* For Waste Gas systems, individual leakage rates will not be quantified. Enter either "major" or "minor" based on criteria provided on the Leakage Measurement Data Sheet for gas filled systems and attempt to isolate leak.

+ For Waste Uquid systems, quantify leakage and attempt to isolate leak.

Salem Common Page 30 of 26' 3~ :e ftp 7 Rev. 2

Page 31: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

V) W c..? 2 « ::r:: u o 2 « V) => f--« f--V)

2 o U) > W 0:::

c..? 2 >-l!-0::: W > 0::: o l!-

W -1 m V) ·2 o [L-V) W 0:::

0::: W V) =>

A. leak Rate Data

SYSTEM/SUBSYSTEM

11 (21) Containment Spray Loop

12(22) Containment Spray Loop

11121) RHR Loop

12(22) RHR Loop

High Head Safety Injection

Intermediate Head Safety InJection - Cold Leg

Intermediate Head Safety Injection - Hot Leg

CVCS Charging

CVCS Seal Injection

Waste Gas * +

Waste Liquid *

PASS * Combined Leak Rate (co/min)

Verified by:

FORM SC.RA·AP.ZZ·Q051-4 (Page 1 of 2)

COMBINED LEAK RATE DATA SHEET

DATE COMBINED SYSTEM COMPLETED LEAK RATE (cc/min)

Engineering Leakage Coordinator

S C .RA-AP .ZZ-0051 (Q)

COMMENTS-

Date

* Leak rates from these systems are for tracking purposes and are not to be added to the combined ECCS leak rate total.

Salem Common Page 31'of~ 3) Rev. 2

Page 32: i ·INSERVICE INSPECTION GROUP . SC.RA .. (Q) .. 2

(/) w (') z « I U

o Z « (/) :::::J f--« f--(/)

z o (/)

> W 0:::

(') Z >-lL.. 0::: W > 0::: o lL..

W -1 CD (/) Z o Cl.. (/) W 0:::

0::: W (/) :::::J

S C ,RA-AP .ZZ-0051 (Q)

+ Enter "Major" or "Minor" in accordance with Form SC.RA~AP.ZZ-0051-2.

Salem Common Page 32 of 2i b~ l.Vt>lY ~(5~?

Rev. 2