i256 applied natural language processing fall 2009 lecture 5 word sense disambiguation (wsd) intro...

I256

Applied Natural Language Processing

Fall 2009

Lecture 5

• Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD)• Intro on Probability Theory• Graphical Models• Naïve Bayes• Naïve Bayes for WSD

Barbara Rosario

2

Word Senses

• Words have multiple distinct meanings, or senses:– Plant: living plant, manufacturing plant, …– Title: name of a work, ownership document, form of address,

material at the start of a film, …

• Many levels of sense distinctions– Homonymy: totally unrelated meanings (river bank, money bank)– Polysemy: related meanings (star in sky, star on tv, title)– Systematic polysemy: productive meaning extensions

(metonymy such as organizations to their buildings) or metaphor– Sense distinctions can be extremely subtle (or not)

• Granularity of senses needed depends a lot on the task

Taken from Dan Klein’s cs 288 slides

3

Word Sense Disambiguation• Determine which of the senses of an ambiguous word is invoked in

a particular use of the word • Example: living plant vs. manufacturing plant• How do we tell these senses apart?

– “Context”• The manufacturing plant which had previously sustained the town’s

economy shut down after an extended labor strike.– Maybe it’s just text categorization– Each word sense represents a topic

• Why is it important to model and disambiguate word senses?– Translation

• Bank banca or riva– Parsing

• For PP attachment, for example– information retrieval

• To return documents with the right sense of bank

Adapted from Dan Klein’s cs 288 slides

4

Resources

• WordNet– Hand-build (but large) hierarchy of word senses– Basically a hierarchical thesaurus

• SensEval– AWSD competition– Training / test sets for a wide range of words, difficulties, and

parts-of-speech– Bake-off where lots of labs tried lots of competing approaches

• SemCor– A big chunk of the Brown corpus annotated with WordNet

senses• OtherResources

– The Open Mind Word Expert– Parallel texts


http://www.senseval.org/

5

Features

• Bag-of-words (use words around with no order) – The manufacturing plant which had previously

sustained the town’s economy shut down after an extended labor strike.

– Bags of words = {after, manufacturing, which, labor, ..}

• Bag-of-words classification works ok for noun senses– 90% on classic, shockingly easy examples (line,

interest, star)– 80% on senseval-1 nouns– 70% on senseval-1 verbs

6

Verb WSD• Why are verbs harder?

– Verbal senses less topical– More sensitive to structure, argument choice– Better disambiguated by their argument (subject-object): importance of

local information– For nouns, a wider context likely to be useful

• Verb Example: “Serve”– [function] The tree stump serves as a table– [enable] The scandal served to increase his popularity– [dish] We serve meals for the homeless– [enlist] She served her country– [jail] He served six years for embezzlement– [tennis] It was Agassi's turn to serve– [legal] He was served by the sheriff

• Different types of information may be appropriate for different part of speech


7

Better features

• There are smarter features:– Argument selectional preference:

• serve NP[meals] vs. serve NP[papers] vs. serve NP[country]

• Subcategorization:– [function] serve PP[as]– [enable] serve VP[to]– [tennis] serve <intransitive>– [food] serve NP {PP[to]}– Can capture poorly (but robustly) with local windows… but we

can also use a parser and get these features explicitly• Other constraints (Yarowsky 95)

– One-sense-per-discourse– One-sense-per-collocation (pretty reliable when it kicks in:– manufacturing plant, flowering plant)


8

Various Approaches to WSD• Unsupervised learning

– We don’t know/have the labels– More than disambiguation is discrimination

• Cluster into groups and discriminate between these groups without giving labels

• Clustering– Example: EM (expectation-minimization),

Bootstrapping (seeded with some labeled data)

• Indirect supervision (See Session 7.3 of Stat NLP book)– From thesauri– From WordNet– From parallel corpora

• Supervised learning Adapted from Dan Klein’s cs 288 slides

9

Supervised learning

• Supervised learning– When we know the truth (true senses) (not always

true or easy)– Classification task– Most systems do some kind of supervised learning– Many competing classification technologies perform

about the same (it’s all about the knowledge sources you tap)

– Problem: training data available for only a few words– Examples: Bayesian classification

• Naïve Bayes (simplest example of Graphical models)– (We’ll talk more about supervised

learning/classification during the course)


10

Today

• Introduction to probability theory

• Introduction to graphical models– Probability theory plus graph theory

• Naïve bayes (simple graphical model)– Naïve bayes for WSD (classification task)

11

Why Probability?

• Statistical NLP aims to do statistical inference for the field of NLP

• Statistical inference consists of taking some data (generated in accordance with some unknown probability distribution) and then making some inference about this distribution.

12

Why Probability?

• Examples of statistical inference are WSD, the task of language modeling (ex how to predict the next word given the previous words), topic classification, etc.

• In order to do this, we need a model of the language.

• Probability theory helps us finding such model

13

Probability Theory

• How likely it is that something will happen

• Sample space Ω is listing of all possible outcome of an experiment– Sample space can be continuous or discrete– For language applications it’s discrete (i.e.

words)

• Event A is a subset of Ω

• Probability function (or distribution) 0,1Ω:P

14

http://ai.stanford.edu/~paskin/gm-short-course/lec1.pdf

15


16


17


18

Prior Probability

• Prior probability: the probability before we consider any additional knowledge

)(AP

19

Conditional probability

• Sometimes we have partial knowledge about the outcome of an experiment

• Conditional (or Posterior) Probability

• Suppose we know that event B is true

• The probability that A is true given the knowledge about B is expressed by

)|( BAP

P(B)

P(A,B)P(A|B)

20


21

Conditional probability (cont)

)()|(

)()|(),(

APABP

BPBAPBAP

• Note: P(A,B) = P(A ∩ B) • Chain Rule• P(A, B) = P(A|B) P(B) = The probability that A and B both happen is the

probability that B happens times the probability that A happens, given B has occurred.

• P(A, B) = P(B|A) P(A) = The probability that A and B both happen is the probability that A happens times the probability that B happens, given A has occurred.

• Multi-dimensional table with a value in every cell giving the probability of that specific state occurring

23

Chain Rule Bayes' rule

P(A,B) = P(A|B)P(B)

= P(B|A)P(A)

P(B)

P(B|A)P(A)P(A|B)

Bayes' rule

Useful when one quantity is more easy to calculate; trivial consequence of the definitions we saw but it’ s extremely useful

24

Bayes' rule

P(B)

P(A|B)P(A)P(A|B)

Bayes' rule translates causal knowledge into diagnostic knowledge.

For example, if A is the event that a patient has a disease, and B is the event that she displays a symptom, then P(B | A) describes a causal relationship, and P(A | B) describes a diagnostic one (that is usually hard to assess).

If P(B | A), P(A) and P(B) can be assessed easily, then we get P(A | B) for free.

25

Example

• S:stiff neck, M: meningitis

• P(S|M) =0.5, P(M) = 1/50,000 P(S)=1/20

• I have stiff neck, should I worry?

0002.020/1

000,50/15.0

)(

)()|()|(

SP

MPMSPSMP

26

(Conditional) independence

• Two events A e B are independent of each other if

P(A) = P(A|B)

• Two events A and B are conditionally independent of each other given C if

P(A|C) = P(A|B,C)

27

Back to language

• Statistical NLP aims to do statistical inference for the field of NLP– Topic classification

• P( topic | document ) – Language models

• P (word | previous word(s) )– WSD

• P( sense | word)

• Two main problems– Estimation: P in unknown: estimate P – Inference: We estimated P; now we want to find

(infer) the topic of a document, o the sense of a word

28

Language Models (Estimation)

• In general, for language events, P is unknown

• We need to estimate P, (or model M of the language)

• We’ll do this by looking at evidence about what P must be based on a sample of data

29

Estimation of P

• Frequentist statistics– Parametric– Non-parametric (distribution free)

• Bayesian statistics– Bayesian statistics measures degrees of belief– Degrees are calculated by starting with prior beliefs

and updating them in face of the evidence, using Bayes theorem

• 2 different approaches, 2 different philosophies

30

Inference

• The central problem of computational Probability Theory is the inference problem:

• Given a set of random variables X1, … , Xk and their joint density P(X1, … , Xk), compute one or more conditional densities given observations.– Compute

• P(X1 | X2 … , Xk)• P(X3 | X1 )• P(X1 , X2 | X3, X4,) • Etc …

• Many problems can be formulated in these terms.

31

Bayes decision rule

• w: ambiguous word• S = {s1, s2, …, sn } senses for w • C = {c1, c2, …, cn } context of w in a corpus• V = {v1, v2, …, vj } words used as contextual features for

disambiguation

• Bayes decision rule– Decide sj if P(sj | c) > P(sk | c) for sj ≠ sk

• We want to assign w to the sense s’ where

s’ = argmaxsk P(sk | c)

33

Naïve Bayes classifier

))P(sP(c|ss kk

ksmaxarg'

• Naïve Bayes classifier widely used in machine learning

• Estimate P(c | sk) and P(sk)

34

Naïve Bayes classifier))P(sP(c|s

ss kk

kmaxarg'

cvj

jjj )sP(v)sc|vvP()P(c|s kkk

in

||}in {

• Estimate P(c | sk) and P(sk)• w: ambiguous word

• S = {s1, s2, …, sn } senses for w

• C = {c1, c2, …, cn } context of w in a corpus

• V = {v1, v2, …, vj } words used as contextual features for disambiguation

• Naïve Bayes assumption:

35

Naïve Bayes classifier

cvj


in

||}in {

• Naïve Bayes assumption:

– Two consequences

– All the structure and linear ordering of words within the context is ignored bags of words model

– The presence of one word in the model is independent of the others• Not true but model “easier” and very “efficient”• “easier” “efficient” mean something specific in the probabilistic framework

– We’ll see later (but easier to estimate parameters and more efficient inference)

– Naïve Bayes assumption is inappropriate if there are strong dependencies, but often it does very well (partly because the decision may be optimal even if the assumption is not correct)

36

Naïve Bayes for WSD

)P(s)sP(vs kk

k cvj

js

in

|maxarg'

))P(sP(c|ss kk

ksmaxarg' Bayes decision rule

cvj


in

||}in { Naïve Bayes assumption

)sC

)svC)sP(v

k

k

k

jj

(

(|

, Count of vj when sk

w)C

)sC)P(s

k

k

(

( Prior probability of sk

Estimation

37

Naïve Bayes Algorithm for WSD

• TRAINING (aka Estimation)• For all of senses sk of w do

– For all words vj in the vocabulary calculate

– end• end

• For all of senses sk of w do

• end

)sC

)svC)sP(v

k

k

k

jj

(

(|

,

w)C

)sC)P(s

k

k

(

(

38

Naïve Bayes Algorithm for WSD

• TESTING (aka Inference or Disambiguation)• For all of senses sk of w do

– For all words vj in the context window c calculate

– end• end

• Choose s= sk of w do

))P(sP(c|s|c)P(s)sscore kkkk (

)sscores k

sk(maxarg'

39

Next week

• Introduction to Graphical Models• Part of speech tagging• Readings:

– Chapter 5 NLTL book– Chapter 10 of Foundation of Stat NLP

i256 applied natural language processing fall 2009 lecture 5 word sense disambiguation (wsd) intro...

Documents