ibudget florida michael p. hansen director rick scott governor senate committee on children,...
TRANSCRIPT
iBudget Florida
Michael P. HansenDirector
Rick Scott Governor
Senate Committee on Senate Committee on Children, Families, andChildren, Families, and
Elder AffairsElder AffairsNovember 3, 2011November 3, 2011
iBudget Overall Goals
• Customer self-direction and choice• Equitable distribution of appropriated Medicaid waiver
funds• Business process efficiencies using technology
2
iBudget Background• 2009 GAA required plan by February 2010
– APD researched other states’ systems and best practices
– APD worked with iBudget Florida Stakeholders’ Group to design plan
• iBudget implementation authorized in s. 393.0662, F.S., in 2010
3
QSI ASSESSMENT1) Functional Score2) Behavioral Score3) Ability to: Transfer, Self-Protect, and Maintain Hygiene
AGE LIVING SETTING
Determines Individual Budgets
4
iBudget Allocation Formula
LEAST FLEXIBLE:•Residential Services•Therapeutic Supports & Wellness
MOST FLEXIBLE:•Life Skills Development•Supplies & Equipment•Personal Supports•Support Coordination•Transportation•Dental Services
CONSUMER CHOICE(12,196 Combinations
of Services)
5
Consumer Flexibility in Spending
Create Overall Plan
Technical/Process
Finalize Deployment Strategy
Implement in Phases Statewide
Transition Areas 1 & 2 In Progress
iBudget Phase-In Plan
In Progress
6
HARD CHOICES
Description Impact
Original Methodology based on original iBudget Plan distribution through algorithm for all services including extraordinary needs for those who qualify.
• Based on current appropriation ($810M)
• Consumers have flexibility to choose services within limits of their individual allocation
• Reductions will be significant for some consumers
7
HARD CHOICES
Description Impact
Base Model
This model compares the iBudget with the current cost plan and selects the result according to the following decision rules: 1.If Cost Plan less than iBudget, select Cost Plan.
2.If iBudget less than Cost Plan, select iBudget except when iBudget less than half Cost Plan. Then select half Cost Plan.
• Retains current cost plan for consumers whose needs are less than the iBudget
• Total cost ($725 M) is within appropriation with funds remaining for extraordinary needs and crisis situations
• Many consumers would not have sufficient allocation to meet their core services needs
8
HARD CHOICES
Description ImpactModel A Including core services
This option would provide funding for core services for consumers whose allocation was insufficient to meet their core services.
• Adds $143 M in cost• About 9,600 people are
affected• Total allocation would
exceed appropriation by about $57 M
• Adult Day Training (ADT) would not be funded for all current people who use ADT
9
Example 1
$39,813
$19,906
$32,613
$47,804
$39,813
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
Cost Plan Half CP CoreServices
iBudget Model A
10
Example 2$79,951
$39,976 $39,442
$24,379
$39,976
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
$80,000
$90,000
Cost Plan Half CP CoreServices
iBudget Model A
11
Example 3$44,802
$22,401
$39,546
$28,283
$39,546
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
$45,000
$50,000
Cost Plan Half CP CoreServices
iBudget Model A
12
Example 4$29,260
$14,630
$5,991
$23,471 $23,471
$0.00
$5,000.00
$10,000.00
$15,000.00
$20,000.00
$25,000.00
$30,000.00
$35,000.00
Cost Plan Half CP CoreServices
iBudget Model A
13
Thank You!
14
Supplemental Slides if Time Allows
15
HARD CHOICES
Description ImpactModel A with Adult Day Training (ADT) Added
This option would provide funding for ADT for consumers whose base allocation was insufficient to include ADT.
• Adds $34.6 M in additional cost
• About 5,200 people are affected
• Total allocation including core and ADT services would total $902 M
16
ADT Example$46,288
$23,144
$36,808
$43,201
$29,937
$36,808
$0.00$5,000.00
$10,000.00$15,000.00$20,000.00$25,000.00$30,000.00$35,000.00$40,000.00$45,000.00$50,000.00
Cost Plan Half CP CoreServices
Core +ADT
iBudget Model A
ADT$6,393
17