icops 2011 june

13
MAGNESIUM BASED PHOTOCATHODES FOR BACK-LIGHTED THYRATRON Esin B. Sozer Dr. Chunqi Jiang Dr. Martin A . Gundersen ICOPS Chicago, IL July 2011

Upload: esinbengisu

Post on 13-Jul-2015

279 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Icops 2011 June

MAGNESIUM BASED PHOTOCATHODES FOR BACK-LIGHTED THYRATRON

Esin B. SozerDr. Chunqi Jiang

Dr. Martin A . Gundersen

ICOPS Chicago, IL July 2011

Page 2: Icops 2011 June

Outline

Pseudospark switches and back-lighted thyratrons

(BLTs)

A look at previously used cathodes for BLTs

Experimental setup and procedures for Mg

integrated BLT

Results

Discussion

Summary

Page 3: Icops 2011 June

Introduction: Pseudospark Switches

• Low pressure (<1 Torr), glow-like discharge operation

• Cold cathode

• High voltage (typ. 30 kV)

• High peak current (1-100 kA)

• High current rate of rise (1012A/s)

• Reasonable lifetime (~109 shots) and repetition rate (1 kHz)

Optically triggered pseudospark switch: Back-Lighted Thyratron (BLT)

Back-Lighted Thyratron and Optical Triggering

• Complete isolation of trigger from ground & high voltage potentials => scalability

• Fiber optic coupling

Page 4: Icops 2011 June

Cathode

Material

(Work

function)

Trigger Source

Wavelength

(Photon

Energy)

Light

Energy

For

Triggering

Delay

(ns)Jitter (ns)

Molybdenum

(4.3-4.6 eV)

222 nm

(5.60 eV)10 μJ [1] 78 0.4

Molybdenum

(4.3-4.6 eV)

308 nm

(4.03 eV)4.4 mJ [1] 78 0.4

Molybdenum

(4.3-4.6 eV)

266 nm

(4.67 eV)7 mJ [3] 85 8

Brass

(4.7-4.8 eV [4])

308 nm

(4.03 eV)

12- 50 mJ

[2]*

150 -

2000 ~15

Brass

(4.7-4.8 eV [4])

308 nm

(4.03eV)

12-50 mJ

[2]*40-80 ~10

Back-Lighted Thyratron (BLT)

[1] C. Braun et al., 1988

[2] Pitchfordet al., 1995

[3] C. Jiang et al., 2005

[4] J. W. Bond, et al., 2008

* Two different cathode hole diameters used. 3 and 6 mm, electrode spacing: 4 mm.

Materials with higher

photosensitivity

Higher electron emission

Better switch parameters

Less light energy for triggering

Mg work function = 3.66 eV

Page 5: Icops 2011 June

5 MΩ16 nF 3 Ω

Probe 2 (x1000)Switch Current

Probe 1 (x1000)Switch Voltage-HV

Experimental Setup and Procedures

13 cm

266 nm

mirror

photodiode

UV

Laser

UV lensf = 25 cm

Mg foil

Hold-off Voltage and Peak Current

Delay and jitter

Lifetime

λ= 266 nmpulsewidth= 5 nsenergy per pulse= 3 mJ

Page 6: Icops 2011 June

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Pe

ak C

urr

en

t (k

A)

Pressure (Torr)

Peak Current

without Mg foil with Mg foil

Self-ignited Breakdown

Peak Currents >6 kA and

Hold-off Voltage >30 kV

The self-ignited breakdown characteristics are independent of presence of Mg foil.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0.2 0.7 1.2

Ho

ld-o

ff V

olt

age

(kV

)

Pressure (Torr)

Hold-off Voltage

without Mg foil with Mg foil

Page 7: Icops 2011 June

Switch DelayEffect of pressure

Switch Voltage= 4.1 kV

Order of magnitude shorter delay is observed with Mg foil.

Both delay and jitter decreases as the pressure increases.

Typical waveformPressure: 0.6 TorrCathode: plain copper

delay

0

5

10

15

20

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

De

lay

(μs)

Pressure (Torr)

without Mg foil with Mg foil (x10)

Page 8: Icops 2011 June

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

De

lay

(μs)

Pressure (Torr)

Switch Delay: Effect of Field

• Delay is at least three times shorter when Mg is present.

Delay measurements with switch voltage at 65 % of self-breakdown voltage at a given pressure:

with Mg foil without Mg foil

Pressure (Torr)

Delay (μs) @ 0.65 VBD

Delay (μs) @ 4.1 kV

Percent difference

Delay (μs) @ 0.65 VBD

Delay (μs) @4.1 kV

Percent difference

0.4 0.28 0.43 35 0.84 14.84 94

0.6 0.17 0.32 47 1.13 6.58 83

0.8 0.15 0.26 42 0.65 3.88 83

17.4 kV 14.3 kV 8.6 kV 4.1 kV

Page 9: Icops 2011 June

Discussion: Contributing electron emission mechanisms

• Photoemission

– hν – ΦMg>hν – ΦCu

– Larger number of electrons per pulse

– Less dependence on field as (hν – Φ0) gets larger compared to

Effect of the same field

enhancement is approximately 10%

of the photoemission for Cu whereas

it is only around 2% for Mg.

b =

β = 1 (Parallel plate)

E*= 500 V/cm

~ 0.01 eV

hν – ΦMg = 1.02 eV

hν – Φcu = 0.17 eV

Page 10: Icops 2011 June

Time-dependent heat conduction equation

• Thermionic emission (Field enhanced):– How much the laser can heat the surface of the cathode?

– At which temperature thermionic emission is comparable to photoemission?

Im= Laser Intensity (W/m2)R = ReflectivityK= Thermal conductivity (W/Km)κ =K/ρcρ=Mass density (kg/m3)c=specific heat (J/kgK)T0=initial temperature (293 K)

Temperature (K)

Mg Cu

Laser heating (7.5 ×107 W/cm2) 832 535

Melting point 923 1358

Discussion: Contributing Electron Emission Mechanisms

Thermionic emission is comparable to photoemission only above ~1700 K

R* ~ 0.85

*Gesell, et al., 1973

A: constant T: Temperature (K)JRLD=Current density (A/cm2)K=Boltzmann’s constant (J/K)ϕ= Work function (eV)

Calculated using QE=10-7

Richardson-Laue-Dushmannrelation for temperature-limited

emission

Page 11: Icops 2011 June

Summary

We have shown that the delay of the BLT switch can bereduced three times or more when low work functionmaterials like magnesium are integrated to its cathode. The best delay measured is 150 ns, at 800 mTorr, 8.6 kV switchvoltage with Mg foil integrated cathode.

Effect electric field enhancement was found to be morefor Cu cathode without Mg foil than for with Mg foil.

This result is in agreement with the estimations basedon photoemission to be the dominating mechanism foremission of seed electrons.

No significant degradation in delay and jitter was observedafter 106 shots at moderate current levels (~2 kA).

Page 12: Icops 2011 June

Thank you!

Esin B. Sozer

[email protected]

Page 13: Icops 2011 June

Lifetime measurementsMg foil after 106

shots

SEM photos: courtesy of Yung-Hsu Lin