ics362 distributed systems
DESCRIPTION
ICS362 Distributed Systems. Dr. Ken Cosh Week 3. Review. Architectural Styles Layered Architectures Object-Based Data-Centred Event-Based System Architectures Centralised / Decentralised / Hybrid. This Week. Processes Threads Virtualisation Clients Servers Code Migration. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
ICS362 Distributed Systems
Dr. Ken Cosh
Week 3
Review
Architectural Styles– Layered Architectures– Object-Based– Data-Centred– Event-Based
System Architectures– Centralised / Decentralised / Hybrid
This Week
Processes– Threads– Virtualisation– Clients– Servers– Code Migration
What is a Process?
OS– A program in execution
Key Issue– Managing and Scheduling Processes– Both in terms of OS and in terms of Distributed
Systems
Processes
The OS creates virtual processors– Each for running different programs
OS has a process table– To keep track of the virtual processors– CPU register values, memory maps, open files, privileges,
etc.
OS manage these independent processes– One process can not affect another– i.e. concurrency transparency
Achieving Concurrency Transparency
Computationally Expensive– Allocation
Create complete independent address space Initialising memory segments
– Potentially moving existing data
– Switching Saving CPU context Modify Memory Management Unit (MMU) Potentially swapping processes between main memory and
hard disk– If more processes than main memory
Threads
Threads are like processes– Executing code independently from other threads– But with no attempt at concurrency transparency
Threads can share the same address space
– Computationally less expensive– But programming requires more intellectual effort
Multithreading
Consider a spreadsheet program– Editing one cell can cause updates to formulae
throughout multiple sheets.– How do we allow user input concurrently with
calculations? And perhaps autosaving
Thread Implementation
Normally in the form of a thread package– Containing operations to create and destroy
threads & synchronisation variables such as mutexes.
Implementation can be done in different ways– Executed entirely in user mode– Kernel responsible for scheduling– Hybrid
User Level thread library
All thread administration is kept in user’s address space;
– Cheap to create & destroy threads
Switching between threads is also cheap
However, a blocking system call will block the process – and hence any other threads in the process.
– E.g. when waiting for input
Kernel level threads
That problem is avoided by implementing threads in the OS kernel.
Then, every thread operation is carried out by the kernel, through system calls– Creation, deletion, synchronisation etc.
Switching threads becomes as expensive as switching processes
Hybrid Implementation
Light Weight Processes (LWP)– LWPs run in user space in the context of a single
process, but several LWPs can run per process with a shared address space.
– Creation, deletion operations etc. run in user space without intervention by the kernel.
Threads in DS
A convenient way of allowing blocking system calls without blocking an entire process.
In DS, threads can be separated to different processors (clients or servers)
Multithreaded Clients
Example: A Web Browser– Setting up connection– Read incoming data– Pass to display component
– Potentially connecting to multiple load balanced replicated servers to transfer data in parallel streams
Multithreaded Servers
Suppose a request comes into a single threaded server.
– The request needs to be completed before any more requests can come
With multithreads, a dispatcher thread can assign a worker thread to read data from a file system
– Normally a blocking operation
Meanwhile the dispatcher thread can deal with more reads, or responses from other worker threads.
Multithreaded Servers
Operating System
Request from network
DispatcherThread
WorkerThread
Virtualisation
Of course, we are still referring to a single processor, but giving the illusion of simultaneous execution.
– ‘Resource Virtualisation’
Renewed interest in virtualisation as distributed systems become popular
– Extending (or replacing) an existing interface to mimic the behaviour of another system
– E.g. to allow software to run on a different platform.
Applications of virtualisation
Hardware & Low level systems software evolves quicker than application software.– Virtualisation allows older, more stable, software
to run on newer platforms
Networking is pervasive across heterogeneous computers– Virtualisation helps by letting each application run
on its own virtual machine.
Virtual Machine Implementation
Virtualisation mimics the behaviour of various interfaces:
– Interface between Hardware and Software, which can be invoked by any program.
– Interface between Hardware and Software, which can be invoked by privileged programs such as the OS.
– Interface of system calls offered by an OS– Interface of library calls offered by an API (essentially hiding
the OS system calls).
Computer Systems Interfaces
Hardware
Operating System
Library
Application
PrivilegedInstructions
System Calls
Library Functions
GeneralInstructions
Process Virtual Machine
Hardware
Operating System
Runtime System
Application
Virtualisation is for single processes
Virtual Machine Monitor
Hardware
Operating System
Virtual Machine Monitor
Application
Multiple different Operating Systems running concurrently on the same platform
Clients
Provide means for users to interact with remote servers– 1) Fat Client
Application specific protocol E.g. Agenda application running on a PDA,
synchronising with a remote (possibly shared) agenda.
– 2) Thin Client Application neutral protocol Client is a terminal with no need for local storage Example – X Window
X Window
Oldest, still widely used networked user interface.
The heart is the ‘X-kernel’ OS running on the client– Containing terminal specific device drivers for
monitor, keyboard & mouse.– Captures keyboard / mouse events and made
available through Xlib library, running elsewhere and communicating through X protocol.
X Window System
X Kernel
Device Drivers
Local OSLocal OS
Window Manager
Application
Xlib Xlib
X Window Manager
Application which dictates the “look and feel” of the display– How to display windows, what buttons etc.– Other applications adhere to these rules.
So.. Confusingly the X Kernel acts as a server where applications play the role of clients!
Communication Efficiency
This takes a lot of data communication!– Video stream 30 frames per second– 320x240 screen (PDA)– 24bits per pixel– = 53 Mbps!
Compression techniques are necessary
Increasing UI Complexity
Drag & Drop Functionality Consider a document which contains text &
images– Document contains multiple applications– Suppose we want to rotate an image
It needn’t reside on the client, but the client may require more processing power.– Or the Client needs to be fatter
Servers
A process implementing a specific service on behalf of a collection of clients– It waits for an incoming request– Then ensures the request is taken care of– Returns to wait for the next request
Iterative vs Concurrent
Iterative Server – Handles the request itself and returns response if
necessary to the user.
Concurrent Server– Passes the request to a separate thread or
another process.– The other process is responsible for responding
to the requesting client.
Ports
Clients send requests to an endpoint (port) Servers listen to a particular port
– E.g. FTP on TCP port 21, HTTP on TCP port 80
Or a Daemon can listen to a port and contact the specific server when requests arrive.
Stateless Servers
Does not keep information on the state of its clients. Can change its state without informing clients
Once an HTTP server delivers the files it forgets about the client.
– Technically the web server might log all client requests as useful information, but if the information is lost there is no damage to the service.
Soft State Servers
Server which promises to maintain state on behalf of the client – for a limited time– E.g. server promises to inform client about
updates, but only for a limited time.
Stateful Server
Server maintains persistent information on its clients.– E.g. server allows a client to keep a local copy of
a file (possibly for updating). Server then maintains a list of client/file entries.
This can improve performance, however if the server crashes it has to restore the list.
Session State vs Permanent State
Bear in mind that Permanent State is generally stored in a database, such as customer information, purchases etc.
Maintaining Session State is part of Stateful Server design.
Stateful vs Stateless
Should not affect services provided by the server.– If files have to be opened before they can be read
from or written to, then either design should mimic this behaviour.
Server Clusters
A collection of machines connected through a network, where each machine runs one or more servers.
Logically organised into three tiers (layers)– Switch – through which requests are routed– Application – servers where programs run– File/Database – where the data is stored
Server Clusters
Client Requests
LogicalSwitch
Application ServersDatabase / File Servers
First Tier Third TierSecond Tier
Server Clusters
Some systems combine the data and application into a single server resulting in a two tiered system architecture– E.g. Streaming Media
Server Clusters
Often Offer Multiple Services, with different machines running different services
– Switch needs to be able to distinguish requests and services.
– Often caused by limitations on available software & hardware, and different administrators not wanting to interfere with each other.
Leads to some overloaded servers, while others are idle.
– Possibility for code migration?
Code Migration
So far we have been concerned with passing data. Sometimes it is useful to pass programs
– Even while they are running
Sometimes overall system performance can be improved by moving processes from overloaded machines to lightly loaded machines.
– Load in terms of CPU queue length or CPU utilisation
Examples
1) A client application needs to perform many database operations– Why not move the operations closer to the data
and then only return the results?
2) A form needs to be filled in, processed and then translated into a series of database operations– Why not do the form processing on the client?
Code Migration
Benefits– Flexibility– Dynamically configured distributed systems– Software need not be pre-installed
Concerns– Security
Strong vs Weak Mobility
A process consists of 3 segments– Code Segment – set of instructions– Resource Segment – references to necessary
external resources (files, devices, printers etc.)– Execution Segment – current execution state of
the process
Weak Mobility
The code segment is sent– In this case the code must always begin from a
predefined point (perhaps the start)– E.g. Java Applets– Only requires that the target machine is capable
of running the code
Strong Mobility
The execution segment is transferred as well as the code segment.– Code can be stopped, moved to a new machine,
and restarted from where it was.– More general than weak mobility, but harder to
implement.
The Resource Segment
Consider; you’ve designed your website on localhost, and then upload it to a webserver– Absolute vs Relative URLs?– Changing IP addresses
The Resource Segment
Binding by Identifier– A precisely referenced resource, and nothing else!
Binding by Value– It doesn’t matter which resource is used, so long as the
correct value is returned.– Does it matter if I use my C++ libraries or yours?
Binding by Type– What type of device are we referring to – a printer? A
monitor?
Kinds of Resource
Unattached Resources– Easily moved – e.g. data files associated with the program
Fastened Resources– Possible, but relatively high cost – e.g. moving a database –
not dependent on current machine, but infeasible to move to a new environment
Fixed Resources– Cannot be moved from environment or machine – e.g. local
resources, or a local comunication end point.
Solutions?
With 3 kinds of process-to-resource bindings and 3 kinds of resource-to-machine bindings, there are 9 combinations to consider.
And 4 common solutions– Establish a Global System wide reference (GR)– Move the Resource (MV)– Copy the Value of the Resource (CP)– Rebind process to a locally available resource
(RB)
Solutions
Unattached Fastened Fixed
By Identifier MV (or GR) GR (or MV) GR
By Value CP (or MV,GR) GR (or CP) GR
By Type RB (or MV, CP) RB (or GR, CP) RB (or GR)