identity assurance profiles and framework documents: peek into proposed ficam changes

13
IDENTITY ASSURANCE PROFILES AND FRAMEWORK DOCUMENTS: PEEK INTO PROPOSED FICAM CHANGES 12/12/12 12/12/12 1

Upload: raheem

Post on 23-Mar-2016

31 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Identity Assurance Profiles and Framework Documents: Peek into Proposed Ficam changes. 12/12/12. Topics. Background Big pic Detailed pic. Program Basics: Documents. Identity Assurance Assessment Framework Identity Assurance Profiles Bronze (NIST Level 1) Silver (NIST Level 2 ) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Identity Assurance Profiles and Framework Documents: Peek into Proposed  Ficam  changes

1

IDENTITY ASSURANCE PROFILES AND FRAMEWORK DOCUMENTS:PEEK INTO PROPOSED FICAM CHANGES

12/12/12

12/12/12

Page 2: Identity Assurance Profiles and Framework Documents: Peek into Proposed  Ficam  changes

2

Topics• Background• Big pic • Detailed pic

12/12/12

Page 3: Identity Assurance Profiles and Framework Documents: Peek into Proposed  Ficam  changes

Program Basics: Documents• Identity Assurance

Assessment Framework• Identity Assurance Profiles

• Bronze (NIST Level 1)• Silver (NIST Level 2)

• Assurance Addendum to the Participation Agreement

312/12/12

Page 4: Identity Assurance Profiles and Framework Documents: Peek into Proposed  Ficam  changes

Program Basics: Assurance Advisory Committee (AAC)

What is the AAC, and what does it do?• Represents stakeholders in the assurance process:

IdPs, SPs, auditors• Oversight for program• Advisory to Steering • Assess applications, recommend approval (or denial) to

Steering• Recommend changes to documents or program

Page 5: Identity Assurance Profiles and Framework Documents: Peek into Proposed  Ficam  changes

5

Program Basics: Assurance Advisory Committee (AAC)

Who is the AAC?• Tim Cameron, National Student Clearinghouse (SP)• Mary Dunker, Chair, Virginia Tech University (IdP)• Steve Devoti, University of Wisconsin-Madison (IdP)• 2nd Auditor• Jacob Farmer, Indiana University (member at large)• Chris Holmes, Baylor University (InCommon Steering)• Scott Koranda, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee/LIGO (SP)• Steve Kurncz, Michigan State University (auditor)• Ann West, InCommon/Internet2 (InCommon staff)

12/12/12

Page 6: Identity Assurance Profiles and Framework Documents: Peek into Proposed  Ficam  changes

6

Assurance Advisory Committee (AAC)

Ex-Officio (non-voting)• Marilyn McMillan, New York University (InCommon Steering)• Tom Barton, University of Chicago (InCommon TAC)• Renee Shuey, Penn State (InCommon TAC)• Jack Suess, UMBC (InCommon Steering)

For more information, visit

http://www.incommon.org/assurance/aac.html

12/12/12

Page 7: Identity Assurance Profiles and Framework Documents: Peek into Proposed  Ficam  changes

7

FICAM Trust Framework Providers• Identity Credential and Access Management Subcommittee

• Federal CIO Council • Information Security and Identity Management Committee

• Trust Framework Provider Adoption Process (2009)• Comparability assessment

• 800-63 as basis for LoA requirements. Incorporates previous work done by the Feds as well under E-Authentication Initiative

• Privacy, organizational maturity, legal status, authority for InCommon and for InCommon to assess for IdP Operators

• Web SSO SAML2 Profile: Over the wire

• Trust Framework Providers • InCommon, Kantara, OIX, Safe/BioPharma

12/12/12

Page 8: Identity Assurance Profiles and Framework Documents: Peek into Proposed  Ficam  changes

8

InCommon’s History with FICAM• 2009-2010

• Spring - 1.0 begun review by FICAM. Community implememtatino begun.

• Fall - Refining of Silver begun due to community feedback• 2011

• Spring – 1.1 Reviewed and approved by community • Fall – FICAM asks for Simplified Bronze. InCommon develops 1.2.

• 2012 • Spring – 1.0 and InCommon fullly approved TFP. 1.2 reviewed and

approved by community. InCommon submits1.2 to FICAM for their approval.

• Est. 2013 • January – 1.2 approved by FICAM.

12/12/12

Page 9: Identity Assurance Profiles and Framework Documents: Peek into Proposed  Ficam  changes

9

What’s the hold up?

This is a new audit!• Federal availability• FICAM program evolving

• Negotiating on behalf of Higher Ed• Changes reflected in 1.2

requires resubmission for the spec

• Big pic items

12/12/12

Page 10: Identity Assurance Profiles and Framework Documents: Peek into Proposed  Ficam  changes

10

Alternative Means• IAAF 1.1: “From time to time, InCommon may identify

alternative means developed by experts from the Research & Higher Education sector as specifying means that are comparable or superior to identified requirements in one or more of its IAPs. “

• Page 2: “Normative criteria to be used in an assessment process are expressed in separate Identity Assurance Profile and approved alternative means documents.”

12/12/12

Page 11: Identity Assurance Profiles and Framework Documents: Peek into Proposed  Ficam  changes

11

Who’s Spec is it Anyway?• Hot potato

• Time and Trust• How do we evaluate these things?• Who gets to say?

• Where will this show up?• Authentication technologies: multifactor• Cryptography: AD Silver Cookbook• Identity proofing: knowledge-based

12/12/12

Page 12: Identity Assurance Profiles and Framework Documents: Peek into Proposed  Ficam  changes

12

Other Big Pics: Where we are… Bronze audit and no-audit option Bronze and 4.2.4 Credential

Issuance and Management Bronze and protection of PII Registration and Credential Records

Retention – 7.5 years Approved Algorithm –

Alternative Means Scope: Profiles are password only –

Alternative Means

12/12/12

Page 13: Identity Assurance Profiles and Framework Documents: Peek into Proposed  Ficam  changes

13

What’s Next?• Develop Process for Alternative Means

with Assurance Advisory Committee

• Continue discussion to work through a couple detailed questions

• Work on FICAM approval expected January 2013

• Publish FICAM-approved spec for community review

• Announce implementation extravaganza and programs!

12/12/12