ifrs the reporting landscape. 2 join khalid aziz economics of icmap, icap, ma-economics, b.com. ...
TRANSCRIPT
IFRSThe Reporting Landscape
2
JOIN KHALID AZIZJOIN KHALID AZIZ
ECONOMICS OF ICMAP, ICAP, MA-ECONOMICS, ECONOMICS OF ICMAP, ICAP, MA-ECONOMICS, B.COM.B.COM.
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING OF ICMAP STAGE 1,3,4 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING OF ICMAP STAGE 1,3,4 ICAP MODULE B, B.COM, BBA, MBA & PIPFA.ICAP MODULE B, B.COM, BBA, MBA & PIPFA.
COST ACCOUNTING OF ICMAP STAGE 2,3 ICAP COST ACCOUNTING OF ICMAP STAGE 2,3 ICAP MODULE D, BBA, MBA & PIPFA.MODULE D, BBA, MBA & PIPFA.
CONTACT:CONTACT: 0322-33857520322-3385752 0312-23028700312-2302870 R-1173,ALNOOR SOCIETY, BLOCK 19,F.B.AREA, R-1173,ALNOOR SOCIETY, BLOCK 19,F.B.AREA,
KARACHI, PAKISTAN.KARACHI, PAKISTAN.
3
JOIN KHALID AZIZJOIN KHALID AZIZ
CRASH CLASSES FOR CRASH CLASSES FOR COMPLETION OF IMPORTANT COMPLETION OF IMPORTANT TOPICSTOPICS
ICMAP STAGE 1 & 2ICMAP STAGE 1 & 2 FINANCIAL AND COST FINANCIAL AND COST
ACCOUNTINGACCOUNTING JOIN NOWJOIN NOW
4
JOIN KHALID AZIZJOIN KHALID AZIZ
FRESH CLASSES FOR ICAP FRESH CLASSES FOR ICAP MODULE B…FINANCIAL MODULE B…FINANCIAL ACCOUNTINGACCOUNTING
REGISTER YOUR SELF NOW.REGISTER YOUR SELF NOW. COMPLETION OF SYLLABUS COMPLETION OF SYLLABUS
WITH ACCENTUATE ON BASIC WITH ACCENTUATE ON BASIC CONCEPTS.CONCEPTS.
The Reporting LandscapeThe Reporting Landscape
Global Markets – the Services Revolution Accountability Cross border Capital flows Bases for business decisions Corporate Reporting failures Corporate Governance Regulatory Framework Changes in Technology and Products
AccountabilityAccountability
A business enterprise receives capital from outside investors, lenders, and other creditors.
It is accountable to them – it has an obligation to keep them informed about performance, conditions, and prospects.
Also accountable to others who provide resources or environment in which to operate: Employees, government, community at large.
Bases for business decisions
Capital Market transactions Mergers & Acquisitions Employee Stock Options Borrowing and Lending
Company failure – director failure !!
October 16, 2001
Issue: Off-Balance Sheet Accounting and Financial Reporting Fraud
Impact: $3 billion in undisclosed losses
June 20, 2002
Issue: Financial Reporting Fraud
Impact: $9 billion in unreported expenses
March 28, 2002
Issue: Financial Reporting Fraud and embezzlement
Impact: $2.5 billion of hidden debt
January 31, 2002
Issue: Financial Reporting Fraud through improper revenue recognition
Impact: $12.4 billion in overstated earnings
FAIRNESS
ACCOUNTABILITY
TRANSPARENCY
Corporate Governance Pillars
TRANSPARENCY
Corporate Governance
Primary characteristicsPrimary characteristics
DISCIPLINE
DISCIPLINE
INDEPENDENCE
RESPONSBILITY
SOCIAL
RESP.N
Regulatory Framework
Sarbanes Oxley Reporting in the financial services sector Quotas, obligations, etc. Taxation Eligibility for business transactions
Changes in Technology and Products
Intangible Assets – Licenses, Rights, etcIntangible Assets – Licenses, Rights, etc Tangible Assets – component accountingTangible Assets – component accounting Barter transactionsBarter transactions Options and SwapsOptions and Swaps FuturesFutures
– Complex arrangements – BOOT, BOT, Complex arrangements – BOOT, BOT, BOMT, Service concession agreements, BOMT, Service concession agreements, etcetc
Accountability
This is what corporate accounting is all about.
Accounting standards help ensure the financial information is:
Relevant Transparent
Reliable Comparable
Understandable
13
Evolution of Accounting Standards
Evolution of Accounting Standards
Historically accounting standards have evolved country by country. Standards set by government, or accounting profession, or Standards set by government, or accounting profession, or
independent board.independent board.
In the USA:In the USA: Independent board Independent board – – Financial Accounting Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) since 1973. Before that Standards Board (FASB) since 1973. Before that – – accounting professionaccounting profession..
In Hong Kong:In Hong Kong: Accounting profession Accounting profession –– Hong Kong Society of Hong Kong Society of Accountants.Accountants.
In China: In China: Government Government – Ministry of Finance.– Ministry of Finance.
Evolution of Accounting Standards
National standards made sense when companies raised money in, and investors looked for investment opportunities in, only their home country.
But that is no longer the case.
Global Accounting Standards Are Needed
Big change in 4th quarter of 20th century: Globalisation of capital markets.
Now, investors seek investment opportunities all over the world.
Companies seek capital at the lowest price anywhere.
Cross-border mergers. Accounting differences can
completely obscure comparisons.
17
Cross border Capital flows
Global Accounting Standards Are NeededGlobal Accounting Standards Are Needed
Number of Foreign Companies Listed on major stock exchanges (October 2006)
London SE, 327
Euronext , 256
Others, 814
Deutsche Börse, 104
Singapore Exchange, 232
Luxembourg SE, 223
NYSE, 453
Nasdaq, 329
World: 51 stock exchanges, 2700 foreign (cross border listings) out of World: 51 stock exchanges, 2700 foreign (cross border listings) out of 40,000 companies40,000 companies
Global Accounting Standards Are NeededGlobal Accounting Standards Are Needed
Global Accounting Standards Are NeededGlobal Accounting Standards Are Needed
Globalisation of Capital Markets
Billion $ % of GDP
Billion $ % of GDP
U.S. 4,167 38 1,922 17
Euro Area 3,569 44 3,609 44
U.K. 2,387 133 2,247 125
Switzerland 343 111 510 165
Canada 223 26 297 34
Australia 212 42 124 24
Sweden 190 63 223 74
Capital inflows Capital Outflows
Source: IMF Workpaper
Global Accounting Standards Are NeededGlobal Accounting Standards Are Needed
On many stock exchanges foreign listings are a large % of total - USA October 2006: NASDAQ: 10% (329 cos., 36 countries). NYSE: 20% (453 companies, 47 countries).
Foreign is 33% of market value. US SEC total:
1981: 173 foreign companies listed in US. 1991: 439 foreign companies listed in US. 2002:1,400 foreign out of 16000 total 2004: 1,236 foreign companies from 53
countries 2005: 1240 foreign companies from 55
countries
Global Accounting Standards Are Needed
Foreign companies that sell securities publicly in the Foreign companies that sell securities publicly in the US must either:US must either: Prepare their financial statements using US Prepare their financial statements using US
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP),
oror Use their national GAAP and include a Use their national GAAP and include a
reconciliation of earnings and net assets to reconciliation of earnings and net assets to comparable US GAAP figures.comparable US GAAP figures.
The 1,240 foreign companies registered with the SEC The 1,240 foreign companies registered with the SEC use about 55 GAAPs!use about 55 GAAPs!
Global Accounting Standards Are Needed
Even with the reconciliation, perhaps 95% of the Even with the reconciliation, perhaps 95% of the financial figures in a foreign company’s annual financial figures in a foreign company’s annual report are based on their national GAAP report are based on their national GAAP –– not not comparable to US GAAP.comparable to US GAAP.
• Pity the poor investor who has to compare Pity the poor investor who has to compare foreign GAAP companies with US foreign GAAP companies with US investment alternatives. investment alternatives.
• Pity the SEC staff reviewer, too.Pity the SEC staff reviewer, too.
Global Accounting Standards Are Needed
Same problem all over the world. And these exchanges do not even require a
reconciliation to national GAAP.
London Stock Exchange (Jan 2006): 17% of companies are non-UK.
550 foreign companies, 65 countries. 66% of market value is non-UK.
Euronext: 25% foreign (345 / 1,392) Switzerland: 32% (132 / 419) Germany: 21% (182 / 866)
26
Examples of Reconciling items USGAAP vs. Other GAAPs
Examples of Reconciling Items
ItemItem US GAAPUS GAAP Many foreign GAAPsMany foreign GAAPs
Revaluation of land, buildings, and intangible assets
Prohibited Permitted, even occasionally required. Sometimes all assets are revalued. In other cases only selected assets are revalued (company can select).
Business combinations
Measure the acquired company’s assets at their fair values at the time the merger takes place.
Sometimes – Carry forward the acquiree’s old historical costs. Do not remeasure assets to fair value.
Examples of Reconciling Items
ItemItem US GAAPUS GAAP Many foreign GAAPsMany foreign GAAPs
GoodwillGoodwill Do not amortise this asset.
Generally require amortisation, usually with 20 year maximum life.
Investments in equity securities
Measure at fair value (quoted market price).
Generally, measure at historical cost if not purchased for short-term trading.
Stock option plans
Permits recognition of the fair value of stock options given to employees as expense. If not recognised, must disclose fair value in the notes. Soon will propose expensing the fair value.
Expense is in some cases not recognised or disclosed.
ItemItem US GAAPUS GAAP Many foreign GAAPsMany foreign GAAPs
Research and development costs
All research and development costs are charged to expense when incurred
While research is generally charged to expense, product development costs often are recognised as amortisable assets rather than expenses.
“Off-balance-sheet” debt
Fairly strict rules* on “derecognition” of financial assets through securitisations repurchase agreements, and on consolidation of special purpose entities.
*Not quite strict enough for Enron.
Limited, if any, rules in this area. Much more off-balance-sheet debt.
Examples of Reconciling Items
ItemItem US GAAPUS GAAP Many foreign GAAPsMany foreign GAAPs
Derivatives On the balance sheet and remeasured to fair market value at each reporting date.
Frequently off the balance sheet. Only recognised at settlement date.
Deferred income taxes
Recognised based on balance sheet differences with tax bases of assets and liabilities.
Sometimes not recognised. If recognised, usually income statement approach. Also deferred tax assets frequently not recognised. Often not adjusted for changes in tax rates.
Examples of Reconciling Items
ItemItem US GAAPUS GAAP Many foreign GAAPsMany foreign GAAPs
Revenue recognition: When is a “sale” made? What if seller has significant
ongoing obligations or performance guarantees or servicing commitments?
What if buyer’s payment is deferred?
Detailed rules, industry by industry, particularly for SEC listed companies.
Limited rules. Usually much more flexibility.
Examples of Reconciling Items
32
Topics covered by IASs
Shortcomings of Old IASC
Weak relationships with national standard setters.
Lack of convergence of IAS and major national GAAPs.
Part-time Board, full-time work load. Needed broader sponsorship than accounting
profession. Needed recognition by regulators. Needed resources.Structure review 1999-2000. Results . . .
Topics Covered by Existing IASs
1 Presentation of financial statements
2 Inventories
7 Cash flow statement
8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors
10 Events after balance sheet date
11 Construction contracts
12 Income taxes
14 Segment reporting
16 Property, plant, and equipment
17 Leases
18 Revenue Recognition
Topics Covered by Existing IASs
19 Employee Benefits
20 Government Grants
21 Foreign Currency translation
23 Borrowing Cost
24 Related Party disclosures
26 Accounting and Reporting by Retirement Benefit Plans
27 Consolidation and Separate Financial Statements
28 Investments in associates
29 Hyperinflation
30 Bank disclosures
31 Joint Ventures
Topics Covered by Existing IASs
32 Financial Instruments: Disclosures and Presentation (disclosure provisions superseded by IFRS 7)
33 Earnings per share
34 Interim Reporting
35 Discontinued Operations (superseded by IFRS 5)
36 Impairment of assets
37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
38 Intangible assets
39 Financial instruments
40 Investment Property
41 Agriculture
Topics Covered by Existing IASs
IFRS 1 First time adoption of IFRS IFRS 2 Share based Payment IFRS 3 Business Combinations IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts IFRS 5 Non-current Assets held for Sale and
Discontinued Operations IFRS 6 Exploration for and Evaluation of
Mineral Resources IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures
(issued 18 August 2005)
IFRS 8 Operating Segments
Issued [30 November]
Effective 1 January 2009 Earlier adoption permitted
Replaces IAS 14
IFRS 8
No significant changes from ED Adopts FAS 131 approach to determining
segments—’management approach’ Focus on the information presented to the
‘chief operating decision maker’ Vertically-integrated operations can have
segments Measurement
Based on measures reported to chief operating decision maker
No requirement for IFRS-based measurement
IFRS 8
Disclosure Enhanced from those in IAS 14 Reconciliation to IFRS-based reporting
required IAS 34 disclosures amended
IFRIC developments
Group and Treasury Share Transactions – IFRIC 11
Service Concession Arrangements – IFRIC 12
IFRIC 11 – Group share plans
Issues: Share-based payments involving own shares Share-based payments involving shares of the parent Intra-group transfers
Share-based payments involving own shares Will always be equity-settled if equity-settled under
IFRS 2
IFRIC 11 (ii)
Share-based payments involving parent shares Parent offers its shares to employees of the
subsidiary Always equity-settled
Subsidiary offers its employees shares of the parent Cash-settled in the individual accounts of the subsidiary
Intra-group transfers—non-market vesting conditions
IFRIC 12
IFRIC 12 Service Concession Arrangements Approved, to be issued [30 November] Effective date 1 January 2008
Public-to-private arrangements only Grantor controls or regulates what services are
provided; to whom; and the price Grantor controls any significant residual interest in the
infrastructure Whole life assets are within the scope if the Grantor
controls services, intended customers and price Operator’s pre-existing PP&E Grantor accounting is not addressed
IFRIC 12 (ii)
Some significant issuesSome significant issues Arrangement considerationArrangement consideration Financial asset vs. intangible assetFinancial asset vs. intangible asset Repairs, restoration and maintenanceRepairs, restoration and maintenance Borrowing costsBorrowing costs Applicability of other IFRSApplicability of other IFRS
Amends IFRIC 4Amends IFRIC 4 Scope exclusion for concession arrangements Scope exclusion for concession arrangements
subject to IFRIC 12subject to IFRIC 12
The IFRIC’s agenda—status
Draft—comment period closed D19 - The Asset Ceiling: Availability of Economic Benefits and Minimum Funding Requirements D20 - Customer Loyalty Programmes
In development IAS 18 - Real estate sales IAS 18 - Initial fees received by a fund manager IAS 18 - Identifying agency arrangements IAS 38 - Advertising and promotional costs IAS 41 - Recognition and measurement of biological assets
The IFRIC’s agenda (ii)
Early stages IFRS 2 - Accounting for employee benefit trusts IAS 11 - Allocation of profit in unsegmented contracts IAS 17 - Sales and leasebacks with repurchase agreements IAS 21 - Hedging a net investment IAS 39 - various hedge accounting issues
Recent and Emerging Trends in International Accounting Standards
Greater use of fair values in measuring transactions: Impairment recognition. Prohibit poolings. Non-monetary exchanges.
Fair values on balance sheet for both financial and non financial assets: Financial Instruments. Agriculture. Investment property. Commodity inventories.
Recent and Emerging Trends in International Accounting Standards
More unrealised components of income: Performance reporting becomes key.
No income smoothing, cost deferrals, general provisions: Remove corridor approach to pensions. Balance sheet approach to deferred tax. No accruals for future losses. Rigorous hedge accounting rules.
Recent and Emerging Trends in International Accounting Standards
Eliminate off-balance sheet items: Derivatives. Special purpose entities. Stock compensation.
More disclosure, especially judgements, plans, assumptions: Judgement in applying accounting policies. Risk management policies. Sensitivity analyses.
Eliminate accounting choices. Convergence with US GAAP.
“Endorsement” of IFRS in Past Few Years
International Organization of Securities Commissions: 100 securities regulators (including the US SEC).
Basel Committee: Global bank regulators (including the US Federal Reserve)
The World Bank and IMF. The G7 Finance Ministers. And many others.
These are non-binding endorsements.
52
Use of IFRS around the world
Use of IFRS Use of IFRS Around the WorldAround the World
Use of IFRS Use of IFRS Around the WorldAround the World
Use of IFRS Use of IFRS Around the WorldAround the World
Use of IFRS Use of IFRS Around the WorldAround the World
Use of IFRS Use of IFRS Around the WorldAround the World
Use of IFRS Around the World
Europe – domestic listed companies: IFRS required in consolidated financial
statements of all European listed companies starting 2005.
About 9,000 companies in 28 countries (15 current EU + 10 joining May 2004
+ 3 EEA).
Member states may require or permit IFRS for unlisted companies, for individual-company statements and/or for foreign companies listed on EU exchanges.
Use of IFRS Around the World
Countries that adopt IFRS almost word for
word as national GAAP (time lag)
Countries that have stopped developing national GAAP and just use IFRS
Australia New Zealand South Africa Singapore Hong Kong Philippines
Bahrain Croatia Costa Rica Cyprus Dominican Republic Ecuador Guatemala Haiti Honduras
Jamaica Kenya Malta Mauritius Nepal Oman Panama Tanzania Tajikstan Trinidad United Arab Emirates
Use of IFRS Around the World
IFRS already required or permitted for some domestic companies: Antilles, Bangladesh, Bolivia, China (B-shares),
Egypt, Hong Kong (if incorporated outside HK), Hungary, Kuwait, Russia, South Africa, Switzerland, Turkey.
IFRS is the “fallback” if national GAAP does not address a question: Mexico, Venezuela.
IFRS permitted for foreign registrants: Most European countries, USA, and many others.
Asia-Pacific Summary
Adoption of IFRS in place of national GAAP: Bangladesh.
National GAAP mostly word for word IFRS: Australia (new policy), Hong Kong, New Zealand (new policy),
Philippines, Singapore. Also several recent standards in India.
IFRS “looked to” in setting national GAAP: Most other A-P countries. To varying degrees.
Some domestic listed companies use IFRS: China, Laos, Myanmar.
Foreign listed companies may use IFRS: Australia, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Pakistan, Singapore,
Thailand. Several in Japan also.
Use of IFRS Around the World
Other developed countries:
Canada: Domestic companies not allowed to use IFRS. In Jan 2006 the Accounting Standards Board of Canada adopted a plan which includes a decision to move financial reporting for Canadian publicly accountable enterprises to IFRSs. Canadian companies registered with US SEC may use US GAAP.
South Africa: All listed companies must follow IFRS starting 2005.
Switzerland: Most listed companies already use IFRS.
Russia: IFRS required for listed holding companies and all banks starting 2004. Phased in for other large companies to 2007.
Use of IFRS Around the World
Market Capitalisation (end 2005 - US $ Trillions)
Others, 8IFRS, 11
US GAAP, 17
Largest companies - Fortune 500 List
US GAAP, 176
IFRS, 200
Japanese GAAP, 81
In terms of largest companies included in Fortune 500 list, 176 prepare their accounts under US GAAP , 200 under IFRS and 81 under Japanese GAAP
IFRS accepted in about
75 jurisdictions
Out of worldwide market capitalisation of over 36 trillion dollars at end 2005: 11 trillion$ corresponds to markets where IFRS are required or permitted and 17trillion $ where US GAAP is the rule
64
Benefits & Criticism of Global Accounting Standards
Benefits of Global Accounting Standards
Positive Findings on IFRS *:
• Overall increase in comparability and transparency
• Enables level playing fields and strengthens market discipline
• Provision of early warning signals on exposure or risks relevant for risk assessment
• Use of a principles-based framework, which provides for adequate degree of flexibility in implementation
* Source: Report titled ‘Assessment of Accounting Standards from a Financial Stability Perspective’ published by European Central Bank – December, 2006
Benefits of Global Accounting Standards
Easier access to foreign capital markets.
Credibility of domestic capital markets to foreign capital providers.
Lower cost of capital to companies.
Comparability of financial data across borders.
Understandability.
Companies keep “one set of books”.
Global education and training.
Convergence criticism
Meaningless without convergence in local practices and laws as national standards are drawn up having regard to local laws, customs, usages and business environment.
Convergence of local practices is a distant dream
Implementation may result in an economic disadvantage to the user considering that national statutes either do not accept the basis on which the standard has been formulated or accept a different basis that secures an economic benefit for the user
Convergence
Training
Debt covenants
Stat. accounts
& taxes
M & AManagement
compensation
Forecasts –
Internal Reporting
I T Systems
Measure of performance
Business Issues
Convergence process
Improving quality
Eliminating numerous options
Convergence
National standards-identical
Shared objectives
Participation
In developing international standards
In content and quality – facilitate convergence
Active participation of US
Guided by some vision of the desired outcome
U.S. views
““As regulators around the world continue the process of developing a As regulators around the world continue the process of developing a set of international accounting standards, some would like the U.S. to set of international accounting standards, some would like the U.S. to embrace standards that would be of higher quality than those embrace standards that would be of higher quality than those currently used in many countries but less rigorous than U.S. GAAP. currently used in many countries but less rigorous than U.S. GAAP. That would be a mistake”.That would be a mistake”.
- Arthur Levitt- Arthur Levitt “…“…..the trend particularly in the U.S. to have a detailed accounting rule ..the trend particularly in the U.S. to have a detailed accounting rule
for everything, no matter how narrow or obscure the issue… for everything, no matter how narrow or obscure the issue… Accountants should encourage the new IASB to emphasize a Accountants should encourage the new IASB to emphasize a principles-based approach. Further, as part of the commitment to principles-based approach. Further, as part of the commitment to convergence, it is time for the FASB and SEC to change their convergence, it is time for the FASB and SEC to change their behaviour and become more like the rest of the world.”behaviour and become more like the rest of the world.”
- Dennis R. Beresford, former chairman FASB- Dennis R. Beresford, former chairman FASB
U.S. views
“I have always wondered if some of those advocating the use of international standards failed to recognize and give appropriate credit to the fact that we in the U.S. have the world’s largest, most liquid capital markets because we do in fact have the ‘best of breed’ financial reporting today. This in turn has provided companies with capital at the lowest possible cost that has been used to generate jobs and an improved global economy.
- Lynn Turner – final speech as Chief Accountant of SEC
Convergence
“The coherent consistent application of IFRS is an essential prerequisite to the elimination of the reconciliation requirement in the U.S. It will take us some time to assess how IFRS is being implemented and enforced, but I am optimistic that we will complete our assessment, well within the 2009 goal for reconciliation, and be able to determine that the reconciliation requirement is unnecessary. Our new Chief Accountant, Conrad Hewitt, is committed to working to achieve this objective as quickly as possible.” – Paul S. Atkins U.S. SEC Commissioner
Convergence concerns
Inadequate compliance with international standards
Global auditing standards International standard oversight function
74
Conclusion
Conclusion
The accounting confusion that results from dozens of national GAAPs in a global financial market is a disservice to investors, creditors, and others who use corporate financial statements.
No one country – not even the USA – has a monopoly on the best financial reporting standards and practices. The accounting scandals of the past few years have
driven that point home in the United States.
Conclusion
Accounting is not a science. Truth is not discovered by scientific experiments in a laboratory. Truth is what the standard setters say it is! Based on a Conceptual Framework. Focused on users’ needs. Without bias.
Users have pretty much the same needs all over the world.
Conclusion
Clear lesson from Enron, WorldCom, Parmalat, etc: Accounting Does Matter!
A single set of accounting standards leading to high quality, transparent, and comparable financial statements makes a lot of common sense.
An opportunity for the Pakistani profession to rise to global standards and be amongst the premier and much sort after professionals of the world.
78
JOIN KHALID AZIZJOIN KHALID AZIZ
ECONOMICS OF ICMAP, ICAP, MA-ECONOMICS, ECONOMICS OF ICMAP, ICAP, MA-ECONOMICS, B.COM.B.COM.
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING OF ICMAP STAGE 1,3,4 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING OF ICMAP STAGE 1,3,4 ICAP MODULE B, B.COM, BBA, MBA & PIPFA.ICAP MODULE B, B.COM, BBA, MBA & PIPFA.
COST ACCOUNTING OF ICMAP STAGE 2,3 ICAP COST ACCOUNTING OF ICMAP STAGE 2,3 ICAP MODULE D, BBA, MBA & PIPFA.MODULE D, BBA, MBA & PIPFA.
CONTACT:CONTACT: 0322-33857520322-3385752 0312-23028700312-2302870 R-1173,ALNOOR SOCIETY, BLOCK 19,F.B.AREA, R-1173,ALNOOR SOCIETY, BLOCK 19,F.B.AREA,
KARACHI, PAKISTAN.KARACHI, PAKISTAN.