iht² health it summit beverly hills - presentation "7 ideas in 7 minutes" with michael...
TRANSCRIPT
Communications today has never been easier…
Not being connected is incredibly frustrating
PATIENT NAME: ____________DATE OF BIRTH: ____________IMAGE TYPE: _______________
MEDICAL IMAGES
Privacy and patient security policy. This is a sample Medical imaging CD. Privacy and patient security policy. This is a sample Medical imaging CD. Privacy and patient security policy.
Yet acceptable when it comes to medical imaging
patientprovider
imaging center
Image viewers do not talk to each other
connected by CDs
image viewers don’t talk to each other
images transferred
via CDs
siloed PACS
low patient engagementlow patient
engagement
Medical imaging today
Cost per patient grows with additional images
• Patient: days before CD is ready for pick up
• Provider: 10-15 min to open and view a CD
• Imaging center: 5-10 minutes to burn each CD
• Delayed appointments; rescheduling
Costs of CDs
PATIENT NAME: ____________DATE OF BIRTH: ____________IMAGE TYPE: _______________
MEDICAL IMAGES
Privacy and patient security policy. This is a sample Medical imaging CD. Privacy and patient security policy. This is a sample Medical imaging CD. Privacy and patient security policy.
Imaging centers•45K~50K patients / year•$12-$16 per CD•$540K~$800K / year
Duplicate imaging
- Wall Street Journal, April 2013
- RSNA, 2009
Potential risks to patient safety
Note: * estimates only, actual amount of radiation varies by weight and other factorsSource: Cancer.org
The average American is exposed to ~3mSv from natural sources over the course of a
year
per patient dosage grows with additional images
Cloudify
Mobilize
Educate
Engage
Empower
DateTypeSubtypeLocationReason(IV) Contrastdose (cc)ResultsRadiation dose (mSv)Personal notes
My notes
what do these results mean for my treatment regiment? Does DrugA seem to be effective? …
Collaborate
Patients retain ownership
Priors available at point of care
Smooth transitions of care
Informed decisions
on the field
Improved access for rural & international communities
Improved access tosecond opinions
% that resulted in change•45%, in diagnostic reads•29%, in pathology results•52%, in treatment recommendations Newman, et al. Cancer 2006.
Reduce costs
