ﺕﺎﻴﺎﻔﻜﻟﺍ ﺽﻌﺒ ﺔﻴﻤﻨﺘ ﻲﻓ ﺓﺩﻭﺠﻟﺍ … · ﺏ...
TRANSCRIPT
-
-
" "
/
. - /
2010/ 1431
-
"18: "
-
...
... ... ....
...
.
-
) 60: ) ((
....
/
. / /
.
- -
.
.
. .
.
-
* * * - * - * * * - * - *
10-1 : 2 * 6 * 6 * 7 * 7 * 8 * 10 *
69-11 : 23-12 * 12 * 14 * 15 *
-
16 . * 17 * 18 . * 19 . * 20 . * 22 . * 23 . *
69-24 " " : 24 * 25 * 26 * 27 * 30 * 31 * 34 * 34 * 35 * 37 " " * 37 * 38 * 46 * 52 * 65 *
97-70 : 71 : 84 :
-
95 113-98 :
99 * 100 * 101 * 103 * 104 * 111 * 111 * 112 *
139-114 : 116 * 128 * 130 * 136 * 140 * 140 * 153-141 *
141 : 148 :
154 *
-
58 . )2-1( 62 . )2-2( 65 .) Y() X( )2-3( 100 . ) ( )4-1( 101 . ) ( )4-2( 101 . )4-3( 102 . )4-4( 102 . ) ( )4-5( 102 . ) ( )4-6( 103 . ) ( )4-7(
104 . )4-8( 105 . )4-9(
106 . )4-10( 107 . )4-11( 108 . )4-12( 109 . )4-13( 110 )4-14( )4-15(
. 110
)4-16( .
111
)4-17( .
112
-
115 )5-1( " )5-2(
( " . )
116
)5-3(
118
)5-4(
121
)5-5(
124
)5-6( .
126
129 . ) ( ) 5-7( ) ( )5-8(
) ( 131
" " )5-9( ) (
133
" " )5-10( ). 10 10-6 5-1(
135
137 )5-11(
-
12 . 1-2 41 . 2-2 44 . 3-2 45 . 4-2 59 . 5-2 61 . 6-2 63 . 7-2 63 . 8-2 63 . 9-2
64 . 10-2 64 . 11-2 66 . 12-2
-
155 . 1 159 . 2 160 . 3 : 4
. 163
164 " " 5 169 6 175 ) -- -( 7
176 8
-
" "
" "
) - - - (
: - ( " " -1
) -
2
-3 ) (
- ( " " -4 ) - -
.
) 55( ) ( :
.
) 221( ) 49( ) 124 97(
) 49 221( .2008/2009
) SPSS( ) One Way ANOVA( )T-Test" ("
.
-
:
: -1 %) 71(
. %) 81( ) 0.05( -2
( " " ). - - -
) 0.05( -3) - - ( " "
. )( ) 0.05( -4
- - ( " " ). - -( ) -
) 0.05( -5 - - - ( " " ). 10 10-6 5-1( )
: . * . * . * . *
-
Abstract
The role of "Quality Assurance Framework" program in developing some managerial competencies of school principals in UNRWA schools in
Gaza governorates
The study aims at studying the role of "Quality Assurance Framework" program in developing some managerial competencies; supported self-review, strategic planning, empowerment, and documentation, of school principals in UNRWA schools, in Gaza governorates, from the point view of the principals, and school supervisors, through answering the following questions: 1- What is the role of "Q. A. Framework" program in developing some managerial competencies; supported self-review, strategic planning, empowerment, and documentation, of school principals in UNRWA schools, in Gaza governorates, from the point view of the principals, and the school supervisors? 2- Are there any statistically significant differences on the level of the function ( 0.05), between principals estimations averages and supervisors estimations averages of this role? 3- Are there any statistically significant differences on the level of the function ( 0.05), among principals estimations averages of this role which are significantly attributed to (sex, scientific qualification, years of service)?
program in " Framework. A.Q"of the role mprovei What are the ways to -4developing managerial competencies; supported self-review, strategic planning, empowerment, and documentation, of school principals in UNRWA schools, in Gaza governorates, from the point view of the principals, and school supervisors. *The researcher used the analytical descriptive method, which is suitable for this study. *To achieve the aims of the study, the researcher prepared a questionnaire of four dimensions, referred to managerial competencies of school principal; supported self-review, strategic planning, empowerment, and documentation, it contains (55) items distributed to the four dimensions, in addition to open question about the ways to improve the role of "Q. A. Framework" program in developing these managerial competencies of school principals. * The society of the study includes all the school principals, their number (221), and school supervisors, their number (49), in UNRWA schools, in Gaza governorates, for the studying year (2008/2009). * The sample of the study consists of all school principals (221), and all school supervisors (49). * The researcher used (SPSS) to analyze the responses of the sample, he used (T-test), and one way ANOVA.
-
The findings of the study: 1- There is appositive role of (Q.A. Framework) program in upraising the following school principals managerial competencies: supported self-review, strategic planning, empowerment, and documentations, with proportional weight between (71%) for supported self review, & (81%) for strategic planning, which are relatively high. 2- There are statistically significant differences on the level of the function ( 0.05), between principals estimations averages and supervisors estimations averages of the role of (Q.A. Framework) program in developing the managerial competencies; supported self-review, strategic planning, empowerment, and documentation, of school principals. 3- There are statistically significant differences on the level of the function ( 0.05), among principals estimations averages of the role of (Q.A. Framework) program in developing the managerial competencies; supported self-review, strategic planning, empowerment which are significantly attributed to sex, in favour of males, but no differences in Documentation field. 4- There are no any statistically significant differences on the level of the function ( 0.05), among principals estimations averages of the role of (Q.A. Framework) program in developing the managerial competencies; supported self-review, strategic planning, empowerment, and documentations, which are significantly attributed to scientific qualification. 5- There are no any statistically significant differences on the level of the function ( 0.05), among principals estimations averages of the role of (Q.A. Framework) program in developing the managerial competencies; supported self-review, strategic planning, empowerment, and documentations, which are significantly attributed to years of service. Recommendations: With the study results light the researcher recommended a group of recommendations; - Sending a team of educational leaders in UNRWA abroad for transfer of experiences of some countries that have implemented this program. - Conducting refreshment training courses for school principals for the implementation of the program. - Forming a team of educational leaders to follow up the implementation of the program and provide feedback to school principals. - Reinforcement successful experiences, and provide material and moral rewards to it.
-
1
-
2
:
).:200243(
9000 9002
:
. ).2003:49 (
) (
).:200232(
:121).2004 (
).:Wolverton19945(
-
3
.
.
).:1998290( - -
- -
).:1998186(
).:2005191(
.
-
4
)Peterson, 2001(
)West,2001( )Polite, 2000( )Jack & Larry, 1990(.
) 2003 ( ) 2005 ( ).2001(
" 2007 " :
( )2008 ( )2008( )2008 ( ).2003( )2007
" "
)2004 2000 ( .
:
. :) (
. - . - . - . - ).13 :2004( -
" " . : ) (
-
5
" " ". "
: : -
. : -
).:200622(
" "
. )2004(
" " ) 2005(
).2:2006 (2006/2007
. ) 2007(
:
.
-
6
: :
" "
: - ( " " -1
) -
2
-3 ) (
( " " -4 ) - - -
: ) 0.05 ( -1
" " ) - - - (
. ) 0.05 ( -2
- ( " " ) - -
). ( ) 0.05 ( -3
- ( " " ) - - ). (
-
7
) 0.05 ( -4 - ( " "
) - - ). 10 10-6 5-1(
:
: - ( " " -1
) - - .
-2 .
-3 ). (
( " " -4 ) - - -
.
: :
-1
. " - - -2
. " -3
". " -4
.
-
8
. -5
: :
"- .)129: 1984 "(
" - ).1992:109("
" - ".
: "-
).4 :1995"(
"-
).34: 2003"( " -
).2007:5 "(
"- ):20075"(
" -
".
-
9
: " -
).25 :2008"( " -
).81 :2005"(
" -
".
: " -
: .
.)2008: 28 ("
: " -
).:1987277("
- " - -
".
: "-
-
10
).:2000237"( "-
1996 "(
).1/ " -
".
: 12-6 "-
42 4).:2005 "(
: " " :
) - ( .
. : . :
. : .2009/2008 :
-
11
-
12
: :
:
).2004:52(
- -
).2004:17(
).17: 2000( :
) 2-1(
-
13
). 20: 2004( .
: " ) 2004(
).52: 2004( " " ) 2004 (
).18: 2004"(
") 1992(
).21: 1992"(
: . -1 . -2 . -3 . -4
: ). ( -
). 65: 2001( -
-
14
:
- -
).:1998290(
.
.
: 2000 ( ).124 -121
... .
).:200240(
: ( "- ) ...
-
15
) ... ( .)99: 2001"(
"-
).52: 2004 ( "-
).19: 2004"(
" " -)Smith&Andrews,1989:13(. "-
).33: 2006 "( ) ( " -
).19: 1998"(
: : ) 2006(
: - . - . - . - . - . - . - -
.
-
16
. - : -
. - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - ). 48-47: 2006 ( -
: : -1
: .
).47: 1992( : -2
).305: 2000(.. :
: -3 ).8: 2005(
): ( -4 ).9: 2005(
-
17
: -5
).65: 1992(
: ) 2004(
: . : -1 . : -2 . : -3 . : -4 . : -5 ).31: 2004( : -6
: ) 1992( : -
. . : -
) 2005( ). 37: 2005 ( -
: : ) 2001(
. -1 . -2 . -3 . -4 . -5 ).93-92 :2001( -6
-
18
:
.
).75: 1992(
).:2001113(
).:2005191(
: " ) 2000( -
).:2000237"(
" -
).1/ 1996 "(
-
19
" - "(
).10: 2000 " -
".
: : ) 1986(
: :
.... : :
. : :
. : :
).200-167: 1986(
: ) 1986(
. : : .
).8: 1986"(
-
20
: .
.)1986:10(
: - -
:
):Self-Skills( -1
:)2001( : -
. : -
. . : - : -
. . - ).97: 2001( : -
): perceptional skills)(( -2
).1997:102(
) 2001 ( : . - . -
-
21
. : - -
. -
).189: 2001(
):Human skills( -3
).104 :2001( ) 2001 (
: . - . - . - ).277: 2001 ( -
):Technical skills( -4
).83: 2004(
:) 2001( . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - ). 190: 2001 ( -
-
22
: ) NESP(
: . -1 . -2 . -3 . -4 . -5 ).NAESP,2001:12( -6
) Crawford&Others,1993:140-143( :
: -1 .
. : -2 . -3 . -4 . -5 . -6 . -7 . -8 ).Crawford&Others,1993:140-143( -9
)Crawford,1993( ) Rutherford,1985( :
. - . - . - . -
.)Crawford,1993:15( - ) Crawford,1993( ) Persell& Cooken,1982(
:
-
23
. . - . - . . - . - . - )Crawford,1993:16.(
: ) Topping, 2002(
: : -1
. : -2
. : -3
. : -4
. : -5
. . : -6 . : -7 . : -8 : -9
). Topping, 2002 :83( ) Smith&Andrews,1989:13( ) Bennis,1984( :
-
24
: -1 .
: -2 .
. : -3 : -4
).Smith&Andrews,1989:13(
- - .
. -
. - - .
: : :
.)19: 2005(
. .
( ).3: 2007
-
25
:
).257:-13 ( : " ) OXFORD( )Quality(
". :
: : ") Juran&Others,1999( -
).Juran&Others,1999: 2.1"( " " " ) Getsch&Davis,2006( -
).Getsch&Davis,2006:5"( ( ) Green) (1993() Haravey( -
: ) 2005 -1
. -2
) Harvard( )Cambridge( )33-32: 2005 .(
") 2005( ).14: 2005 "(
:
: : : -1).. 195: ) (( .
. )90: ) (... ( : (: : -2
88: ) (( .
-
26
"( :" .)
: : -3 ). 112 \1 "( "
" : " : -5 :
).113: 2004(
: ) 2007 (
: : :
)Operator( .
)Forman( : :
. )Inspection( : :
). Police Control( )Statistical Quality Control(: :
(
) Walten shewart( ) . )Quality Assurance(: :
-
27
) Strategic Quality Management( : :
: . -
. - . -
)Total Quality Management:( :
).46-44: 2007 (
:
)?what"(" (?How)" "
).Colardyn,1998:10(
" "
.
).Belatwati&Zuhairi,2007:1(
: " ) 2005(
-
28
).118: 2005"(
:" ) Khoo&Others,2004( ) Okland 1993( - -
).Khoo&Others,2004 :3"(
: : )2001(
. -1 . -2 . -3 . -4 ).70: 2001( -5
: : -)2001( -
: -1
. .
.
: -2
.
: -3
).81-72: 2001(
-
29
: : ) Colardyn,1998(
: -1
.
: -2
. : -3
).Colardyn,1998:22-23(
: : )(Belatwati&Zuhairi,2007
. . . . . . . .
).(Belatwati&Zuhairi,2007:7-10 .
: )(Belatwati&Zuhairi,2007
: : -1
:
. : -2
-
30
.
: -3
. .
: -4 .
.
. : . 5
. .
).(Belatwati&Zuhairi,2007:2
: ) 2005(
: ):Edward Deming( -1
.
.
)Walter shewart( .
-
31
):Joseph Juran( -2
.
. : ):Philip Crosby( -4
) ITT( )Zero Defect(
).25: 2005(
:
.
).368: 2001(
(ISO)
. " "
).80: 2007(
. )Office for Standards in Education) (OFSTED(
-
32
) Quality Assurance Agency) (QAA( ).223: 2005(
" "
. :
: " ) 2002( -
( )
).61: 2002 "(
") 2003( -
).34: 2003"( " )2007 ( -
).2007:5 "( " )1995( -
).4 :1995"( " )2007( -
.):20075"(
-
33
: : )2005(
. 1 .
. . 2 . . 3 . . 4 . . 5 . . 6 . . 7 . . 8 . 9
).76: 2005(
:
). ( :
. 1 .
. 2 .
. . 3 . . 4 . 5
. . . 6 . 7
).38-35: 1995(
-
34
:
: : .1
. :
: -
. .
: -
.
: . 2
).65 -58: 2005(
: " ) 2007 ( -
).9: 2007 "(
" ) UNESCO,2002( -
).UNESCO,2002:133"(
-
35
" ) 2008 ( -
).25: 2008"(
: ) (Belatwati&Zuhairi,2007
: . - . - . - ./ - . - . - ). (Belatwati&Zuhairi,2007:2 -
: ) 2005 (
: : - 1
. . - 2 - 3
..... . - 4 - 5
. ).74-:200571 ( - 6
-
36
:
: 1950 . - . -
: : 1963
.
. ) (
). 6-4: 1999(
: : -1
. : -2
: : -
. : -
. )6-1: 2005(
-
37
: :
" . ."
": " (
) 2004 2000 .
) Department of International Development( )DFID( )British Council)(BC)(13: 2004.(
": " :
. - . - . - -
. . - ).10-6: 2006( -
": " : ) (
: -1
. : -2
.
-
38
: -3
. : -4
.
5 .()24-23: 2008( : -5678.(
" " .
.
:
: . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - ).47-46: 2008.( -
: . -1 . -2
-
39
-3 .
. -4
: : :
. ).Dembowsk,1999:21(
).Adams,2008:7(
: " ) Adms,2008( -
..
).Adms,2008:3"( " ) Tomlison,2004 ( -
).Tomlison,2004:387"( " ) Tomlison,2004( ) Hopkin,1984( -
).Tomlison,2004:338"(
: " ) Adams,2008( ) Watson &Maddison( -
... ).Adams,2008:7"(
-
40
: . -1 . -2 . -3 . -4 . -5 . -6 . -7 . -8 ).Adms,2008:1( -9
: . - . - . - . - . - . - ).Dembowsk,1999:21( - ).Tomlison,2004:338( -
: . -1 . -2 . -3 . -4 . -5 . -6 . -7 . -8 . -9
-
41
. -10 . -11 . -12 ).Adams,2008:9( -13
)Tomlison,2004:393( ) 2- 2(
: . .1 . .2 .3
: . .1 . .2 . .3 .4
.
: . .1 .2
. . .3 .4
.
: . .1 .2
. . .3 . .4
: . .1 .2
. .3
. . .4 .5
.
-
42
." "
: " )Wilson&Holand,2005( -
).Wilson&Holand,2005:5"( " -
) ( ) (
). 27: 2008"( .
:
.
: . - . - . -
: ) ( . -
. - . - -
.)43: 2008(
-
43
: : ) 2008(
. - -
. . - . - -
. -
. -
. . - -
. -
.)46-44: 2008(
:
: . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . -
-
44
. - . - ).46: 2008( -
: :
) () (
.
).16: 2008(
:
)17 :2008( ) 2-3(
-
45
:" " " " " "
" "
" "
- .
).12: 2008(
) 2-4 (
/
:
-
46
:
. .
).2: 2006(
. .
).Bloglu,&Others,2008:430(
: )Strategy( )Strategos (
.)110 :2006 (
.
: " )2006 ( -
).111: 2006 (
" ) Farra,2001( - -
- ).Farra,2001:4("
" ) 2003( -
-
47
).214: 2003"(
" ) 2002(
).139: 2002"(
: :
: -1
. : -2
.
)SWOT(
. : : -3
).Alexandra,1999:5-6(
: : )Yvette,2006(
. - . - . - . -
-
48
. - . - . - . - . - ). Yvette,2006:5-7( -
: " ) 2006( -
).63: 2006"(
" ) 2007 ( -
).8: 2007"( ).2007 ( -
: : ) 2001 (
).Objectives( - ).Actions( - ).Resources( -
).13: 2001(
-
49
: :. 1
.
:
. - . - . - . - . - . - ).133 : 2007 ( - :. 2
:
: . - . - . - . - ).Andrea,2005:21( - ): ( .3 : .
.
-
50
.
: . "
).255: 2007 "(
.
. :
: - - ): SWOT( -
) Weaknesses( ) Strengths( . ) Threats() Opportunities(
): STEEP( - :
).Social( - ).Technical( - ).Economic( - ). Educational( - ).9: 2002 )( Political( - :. 4
.
.
: . : - . : - . : -
-
51
: - .
: . 5 .
: . 6
. : . 7
).31 -9: 2002 (
:
: . -1 ).Dimmock,1993:221( -2 ).Rowiz,2008:347( -3 . -4 . -5 . -6 . ) SWOT( -7 . -8 ).Russell,2005:66( -9
. -10 . -11 . -12 ).Geyer,2006:10-12( -13
-
52
. : :
).74: 2007 (
).55: 2008 (
.)138: 2008 ( :
).343: 2000(
: " ) 1998 ( -
). 164: 1998 "(
" ) 2000( -
).77: 2000"( " ) 2008( - ).138: 2008 "( " -
-
53
(" .)www.creativeh.maktoobblog.com
" - - )Y(
".
:
: ) 18( : (
21: )((. .)84: ) ( ( : ( :
6: ) ((.
(: .)41: )( :
. :
-1 .
. -2 . -3 . -4 . -5 . -6 . -7
http://www.creativeh.maktoobblog.com -
54
.)Gradon,1998:46( -8 :
:
: . .
: .
. : .
).432: 2001(
: . -1 . -2 . -3 . -4 .) ( -5 . -6 ). 2008:138( -7
: ) 2008 ( Wilkinson,1998)( :
):Information sharing( -1
.
:)Upward problems solving( -2
.
-
55
): Task Autonomy( -3 .
): Attitudinal shaping( -4 .
): Self Management( -5 ). 119: 2008 ( :
: )Grazier,1989( . - . - . - . - . - . - .)Grazier,1989:129( -
: ) Dunlop() Pfeiffer(
" ".
).Pfeiffer&Dunlop,1990:11(
: : ) Davis() Goetsch(
. -1 -2
. -3
. ).Goetsch&Davis,2006:241-244( -4
-
56
:
). 27: 2008(
: . - . ).33: 2008( ) Y( )X( -
: :
:
" ) 2005 ( -
).188: 2005 "( " )2007 ( -
).144: 2007"(
" ) UNESCO,2002( - ).UNESCO,2002:127"(
. )Intelligent Accountability(:
)Onora ONeill( )BBC( 2002
"
.
-
57
."
).www.bbc.co.uk/radio-4 (
. )Onora ONeill( ) Milliband,2004(
"
).Milliband,2004:11"( ) Terry crooks( 2003
:
. - 1 . - 2 - 3
. - 4
. - 5
. ) Crooks ( - 6
www.fairtest.org/som-criteria-intelligent- accountability-applied-a :
- 7 .
- 8 .
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio-4http://www.fairtest.org/som-criteria-intelligent -
58
- 9 ).27: 2008(
: . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
: :
) 2-1 (
. * . *
* .
. *
* .
* .
: * . - -
. . -
: * . - . - . -
-
59
).13: 2007(
:- 1970 (Joseph Luft) ) Harry Ingham(
.(Johari Window)
:
) 2- 5(
: ( Public) -1 .
. ): Blind( -2
. .
):Private( -3
. .
):Unknown( -4 .
: . 56- 58):(
www.kaau.org/attachment.php/ 1186&d
http://www.kaau.org/attachment.php/ -
60
:
.
: .)161: (
www.kau.edu.sa/e-books/thaqafa/communication skills_part6.pdf
.
.
) ( . )(
.
:
. - ) feedback( -
).39: 2008(
http://www.kau.edu.sa/e-books/thaqafa/communication -
61
) Feedback: (
) 2-6(
:
.
. . :
: -1 .
. : -2 : -3
.
)
d
iscl
osur
e:(
-
62
. : -4 :
% 30 - .
% 13 - .
% 55 -
. % 2 -
.
).35: 2008(
) 2-2(
55% 30% 2% 13%
.
. )37-36: 2008(
-
63
-1
)2-7 (
. -2
)2-8(
. -3
)2-9(
-
64
. -4
)2-10(
-5
)2-11(
.
: 2008 ( 37.(
:)x( )y(
) y( ) Mc Gregor(
) x( . ) y(
).16: 2005(
-
65
)Y() X( ) 2-3(
: y : x .
. .
.
.
. .
. . .
.
) Y( .
.
....
-
.
: :
.
).W.H.O,2006:337(
-
66
.
).135: 2004( :
: .)385: 2000(
: " )Guzman&Verstappen,2003( -
) ( &Guzman"(
Verstappen,2003:13.( " -
."
: . -1 . -2 . -3 . -4 . -5 . -6 ).W.H.O,2006:337( -7
:
)Guzman& Verstappen,2003:17( ) 2- 12(
)(
-
67
. :
- " )2008( .)31: 2008("
.)31: 2008(" :
- .
. - . - . - . - -
. -
.)31: 2008( :
) 2008( :
: : .
.
).59: 2008(" : :
: . :
-
68
)( : - .)(
:
. .
: .
: .
). 62-60: 2008(" : :
.
.
).32: 2008(
): ( :
.
)(
).66: 2008(. : :
.
-
69
.
: 2008 (
67(. : :
. .
: . - . - . - . - . - . - . - . - ). 69: 2008( -
-
70
-
71
" "
) (
. .
: : )2008( -1
" ."
.
. ) 58(
. ) 117( :
.
.
)2008( -2 " "
.
.
-
72
: ( ) 56(
).
) 594 ( ) . (
:
. :
. - . -
)2008( -3 " "
.
. ) 60( ) 122 (
) 161( ) 2007/2008( .
: .
: . - . - -
-
73
) 2007( -4 " "
. )150(
. ) 193( ) 4( )65( :
. )10( :
.
.
)2007( -5 " "
.
.) 6( ) 54(
. ) 50( ) 150( :
. - . -
-
74
)2007( -6 "
"
.
)86( ) 4( ) 44( . )281(
.
). (
:
" " -
. -
. -
.
)2007( -7 " "
.
-
75
( ) 76( ) ( ) - -
. ) 194( ) (
.
)2006( -8 "
"
.
)111( 2006 -2005 ) 57( ) 54(
) 86( ) ( .
. ) 19(
.
)2006( -9 "
"
.
-
76
) 50( .
) 326( ) 3117( ) 2536( ) 102( ) 196( .) 174(
100( ) 70 80 150( ). 650 550 1200( ) 20 20
:
). (
.
)2006( -10 "
".
.
( ) 6( )60(
). ) 86(
. ) 115( :
.
.
-
77
)2005( -11 " "
.
: ) 45(
. ) 140(
.
.
)2005 ( -12 "
" :
2002/2003 2001/2002
.
: ) 72(
) 260 ( . %) 50(
) 90( ) 150: ( . ) 65(
.
-
78
.
)2003( -13 "
"
.
: )174(
. :
. .
)2003( -14 "
"
. )34(
)68( .
-
79
.
)2002( -15 "
"
.
) 184( ) 74( ) 110( :
. : : ) ( )53(
.
: -
.
- .
:
.
-
80
)2002 ( -16 " "
.
. ) 78(
) 75( .1998/1999 1995/1996
: . - . -
)2001( -17 " "
.
) 43( ) 55( . ) 12(
) (
).(
. ) 183( : .
-
81
) 2000( -18 ) ( " "
.
) 240( / 1999
: . 2000 . -1 . -2 . -3
: . -1 . ) ( -2
)1999( -19" "
.
:
. :
- .
. -
-
82
.
)1999( -20 "
".
.
) 235( .) 28(
) 285( .
:
.
.
)1999( -21 "
".
.
) 12(
. ) 168( 1998\1997
:
-
83
- .
- .
)1998( -22 " "
1997/1998
.
: ) 32(
. ) 45(
. . :
. -
.
-
84
: : )Baloglu&Others) 2008 -1
: " "
"The Strategic Planning Attitude Scale: A Study of Exploratory and Confirmatory Analyses"
.
302 56 140( )498( ) 77 421( )
. )350(
)60( )47(
)35(
.
)Prawit) 2008 -2 "
" "Teacher Empowerment and Developing a curricular Management System in Municipal School Using Cooperation between University
and Municipality in Thailand" 2000
. ) ( 2005) ( .
. :
)40( : .
. )160( :
-
85
. : :
. .
.
.
)Henkin& Others) 2007 -3 " : "
"Teachers Teams, Team work, and Empowerment: Exploring Associations and the Nexus to Change"
. :
- -
.) 159( )1 3( ) 4(
.
)Alsburg & Hackmann) 2006 -4 : "
" "Learning From Experience: Initial Findings of a Mentoring/
Induction Program for Novice Principals and Superintendent" ) (
. 2004\ 2003 2003 \ 2002 ) 52( ) 35( ) 45(
. .
-
86
.
.
.
)Hicks,&Dewalt) 2006 -5 " "
"Teacher Empowerment in Decision Making Process"
.
. 207( ) 393( ) 40 40( )80(
. ) 186
.
.
)Moye & Others) 2005 -6 " - : "
"Teacher principal Relationship: Exploring linkages between Empowerment and Inter-Personal Trust"
.
. .
: . -
-
87
- .
.
)Wan) 2005 -7 " "
"Teacher Empowerment As Perceived by principals in Hong Kong"
. ) 34(
) 20( ) 14( .
. ) 102( :
-
: .
. - .
)Hauser) 2004 -8 " "
"Lessons Learned from a school\Community Strategic Planning Process"
.
-
88
)28( ) 34(( ) 62( )
. ).( ) (
.
. .
)Bell ) 2002 -9 " "
"Strategic Planning and School Management: Full of Sound and Fury Signifying Nothing?"
.
.
.
.
-
89
)Bace ) 2001 -10
" " "State in-Service Training Model for Local Direction of Vocational
Education"
.
.
.
.
)Chapin ) 2001 -11 " "
"Analysis of the Effective of an Educational Leadership Training Program"
.
. . ) 15(
.
: . - -
.
-
90
)Johnson) 2001 -12 " "
"The Strategic Management"
.
. . ) 232(
.
.
)Peterson) 2001 -13 " : "
"The Professional Development of Principals: Innovations and Opportunities"
.
:
-1
. -2
. " " -3
. -4
.
-
91
" -5 . "
-6 .
.
.
)West) 2001 -14 " : "
"The Influence of Principals on the Institutionalization of Developmentally Appropriate Practice: A Multiple Study Case"
.
)8(
. ) 4(
)3-1( 1993-1996 ).(
.
.
-
92
)Anfara & Others) 2000 - 15 : "
" "Middle Level Leadership for 21st century: Principals, Views on Essential Skills and Knowledge; Implication for successful
Preparation"
.
:
. . ) 125(
.
.
)Ballet )2000 -16 " "
"Evaluation of Training Program for Primary School Principals"
1998
. 2000
. ) 9(
.
-
93
.
)Polite) 2000 -17 " : "
"An Effective Professional Development Police for Urban Principals: Reflective Thinking into Practice"
. ) (
.
) 19( 1999/1998
. .
.
)Cohn) 1999 -18 " "
"An Analysis of School District Strategic Planning Relationship with School Action Planning"
.
. ) 13( ) 8( ) 5(
.
.
-
94
: . - . - -
. . -
)Jack & Larry)1999 -19 "
" "Formatting a Proactive Principal Preparation Program in Response to the National Reform Movement in Education Administrative
Preparation"
:
. 1 . -2 . -3 . -4
. .
-
95
: :
( )
. : -1
.
. : -2 : -
- )2007( )2008(
( )2006 )Baloglu&Others,2008( )Hauser,2004( )Bell,2002 ( )Cohn,1999(. )Prawit,2008( -
& Moye( )Hicks,&Dewalt,2006( )Henkin& Others,2007( Others ,2005 ( )Wan,2005(.
- ( )2003 ( )2007 ( )2008(
).2003 -
)2001 ( )2005 ( )2007 (
-
96
)Ballet , 2000 ( )Peterson, 2001( )Chapin,2001( )1998( .)Jack & Larry, 1990(
: .
: - -
)2007 ( )2007 ( . ) 2003( ) 2000 ( )2008( -
. )Baloglu&Others,2008( ) 2006( -
. : -
.)Alsburg & Hackmann ,2006( )2007( )2003( : -3
: . - . - . - . - . - . - . )( - : -4
" " *
"
-
97
) 2007 ( " .
* ). (
-
98
-
99
) ( .
:
- (
. ) - -
.)187: 1992 (
: : :
)221( . 1 : )2009/ 2008(
-
100
)4-1( ) (
40 21 14 7 19 8 11
14 8 6 11 5 6
12 12 - 6 3 3
26 20 6 17 8 9
43
6 4 2 3 1 2
4 2 2 3 1 2
10 8 2 7 3 4
7 4 3 4 2 2
27 18 9 17 7 10
44
18 11 7 11 4 7
18 11 7 10 4 6
36 22 14 21 8 13
57
16 9 7 10 4 6
6 5 1 5 1 4
22 14 8 15 5 10
37
221 132 88 44 89 36 53
- - ( 49 -2
) - - - - - :
-
101
)4-2( ) (
3 - 3
9 1 8 8 2 6
8 - 8 9 1 8
3 - 3 8 2 6 1 - 1
49 6 43
)4-3(
%81.9 221
18.1% 49 %100 270
:
: ) 2008/2009( -1
. ) 221( ) ( ) 30(
)191(
) 19( . ) %90( ) 172(
- ( )49( -2 - - - - - -
%) 100( ).
-
102
) 4( . ) 91.8( ) 45(
: ) 4-4(
%79.3 172 %20.7 45
%100 217
) 4-5(
) (
%47.7 82 %52.3 90
%100 172
) 4-6(
) (
%13.9 24 %66.3 114
%19.8 34 %100 172
-
103
)4-7( ) (
%8.7 15 5-1 %46 79 10-6
45.3% 78 10 %100 172
:
: : -1
.
: -2 - - - :
. : -3
:
).19( : ).29( : ).21(: ).18(:
) 87( :
. - . -
-
104
. - . ) 1(
)4-8(
19 29
21 18
87 : -4
4 5 (:) ( ) 1 2 3
.
:Validity: -5 :
Referees Validity: -
) (
. ) 3(
:
-
105
)4-9(
16
17 13 12
58 Internal Consistency: -
" ).127: 1994 "(
) 30(
)Statistical Package for The Social Sciences( )SPSS( :
-
106
)4-10(
0.01 o.63 . 1 0.01 o.73 . 2 0.01 o.62 .) ( 3 0.01 o.82 . 4 0.01 o.76 ).( ) ( 5 0.01 o.67 . 6 ) - -( 7
. o.63 0.01
0.01 o.68 . 8 0.01 o.62 . 9
0.01 o.71 . 10 0.01 o.66 . 11 0.01 o.72 . 12 0.01 o.68 . 13 0.01 o.62 . ) ( 14 0.01 o.67 . 15 0.01 o.57 . 16
0.463) = 0.01( ) 28( 0.361) = 0.05( ) 28(
) 4-10( ) 0.01(
)0.82() 0.57( .
-
107
)4-11(
o.32 . 1 0.01 o.55 . 2 0.01 o.52 . 3 4
.o.59 0.01
0.01 o.49 . 5 0.01 o.75 . 6 0.01 o.74 . 7 8
.o.59 0.01
0.01 o.50 ). ( 9 0.01 o.68 . 10 0.01 o.66 ). ( ) SWOT ( 11 0.01 o.70 . 12 13
.o.57 0.01
14 .
o.57 0.01
0.01 o.62 . - - 15 0.01 o.58 . 16 17
.o.64 0.01
0.463) = 0.01( ) 28( 0.361) = 0.05( ) 28(
) 4-11( ) 0.01(
)0.75() 0.49( . ) 1(
-
108
)4-12(
0.01 o.68 . - 1 2
.o.54 0.01
0.01 o.67 . 3 0.01 o.76 . 4 0.01 o.52 . 5 o.35 . ) Y( 6 0.01 o.74 . 7 o.35 . 8 9
. o.53 0.01
0.01 o.45 . 10 0.01 o.53 . 11 0.01 o.63 . 12 0.01 o.45 . 13
0.463) = 0.01( ) 28( 0.361) = 0.05( ) 28(
) 4-12( ) 0.45( ) 0.01(
)0.76( . ) 8( ) 6(
-
109
)4-13(
0.01 o.65 ). ( 1 0.01 o.72 . 2 0.01 o.62 . 3 0.01 o.65 . 4 0.01 o.62 . 5 0.01 o.60 . 6 0.01 o.55 . 7 0.01 o.81 . 8 0.01 o.74 . 9
0.01 o.58 . 10 0.01 o.58 . 11 0.01 o.65 . 12
0.463) = 0.01( ) 28( 0.361) = 0.05( ) 28(
) 4-13( ) 0.55( ) 0.01(
. )0.81( )4-13 4-12 4-11 4-10(
) 0.01( ) 8() 6( ) 1(
) 55( :
-
110
)4-14(
16 16
11 12
55
. ) 2( Structure Validity: -
)4-15(
1 0.885 0.903 0.904 0.883
0.885 1 0.686 0.725 0.679
0.903 0.686 1 0.761 0.782
0.904 0.725 0.761 1 0.78
0.883 0.679 0.782 0.78 1
0.463) = 0.01( ) 28( 0.361) = 0.05( ) 28(
) 4-15( ) 0.01(
.
-
111
:Reliability: -6 ) 30(
. Half- Split: -
-
)Spearman-Brown( : )4-16(
0.85 0.74 16 0.89 0.81 17
0.87 0.77 13 0.89 0.81 12
0.97 0.95 58
)4-16( )%97( )%85(
. alfa - Coefficient Cronbach's: -
:
-
112
)4-17(
0.77 16 0.76 17
0.75 13 0.72 12
0.81 58
) 0.72( ) 4-16( ) 0.81(
.
): ( -7
: *
).3( ) 49( ) 191 ( *
2008/2009
. *
) 1 -2 -3 -4 -5( .) 275(
: -8 :
. - . -
-
113
- .
) T-Test" (" - .
. ) T-Test" (" - ) One Way ANOVA( -
.
-
114
.
.
.
.
-
115
)SPSS( :
%)100(
)2009 ( )2008 ( )2004( .
: 4 = 1-5 . 0.80 = 5/ 4 = / = . ) 0.80( .
: . )5-1(
%36 -% 20 1.8 -1
%52 -% 36 2.6 -1.8 %68 -% 52 3.4 -2.6 %84 -% 68 4.2 -3.4 %100 -% 84 5 -4.2
-
116
: : "
) - - - (
:
)5-2( " "
) (
%
%71 11.8 56.8 16 4 %81 10.4 68.9 17 1
%78 8.7 51.3 13 2 %77 7.05 46.08 12 3
: %)81(
. ).2007 (
) " ( " .
.
. " ) (
." %)71(
%81 ( : %)77 %78
-
117
. . : .
. . .
%)81(%) 71( " "
( . )
)2007 ( )Bace, 2001( )Alsburg& Hackmann, 2006( )2006 (
)Ballet, 2000( )Champin, 2001( .
.
-
118
: : -1 )5-3(
1 68.664 0.79 3.4332 .
13 47
2 .
3.3825 0.80 67.65 14 49
40 9 70.506 0.89 3.5253 .) ( 3 44 11 69.586 0.90 3.4793 . 4 33 5 72.35 0.99 3.6175 )( ) ( 5 54 16 65.806 0.95 3.2903 . 6 ) - - ( 7
. 3.5806 0.90 71.612
6 35
37 7 71.52 0.92 3.5760 . 8 30 3 73.364 0.88 3.6682 . 9 41 11 70.0876 0.89 3.5438 . 10 34 8 71.89 0.86 3.5945 . 11 32 4 72.812 0.89 3.6406 . 12 23 1 76.866 0.90 3.8433 . 13 24 2 76.498 0.93 3.8249 . )( 14 15
.3.4839 0.94 69.678
12 43
50 15 67.466 0.87 3.3733 . 16
:
" " : ) 13( - %).76.866(
-
119
" ) ( " : ) 14( -)76.498.(% " " : ) 9( -)73.364.(%
) ( ) (
) ( : )(
. :
. * . * *
. : ) ( . - . - . -
)(
.
. ) Polite,2000( )Jack& Larry,1999(
.
: " " : ) 2( -
.%)67.65(
-
120
" ": ) 16( - .%)67.466(
" " : ) 6( - .%)65.806(
. ) (
. - . - : ) O`nora O`Neill(
. .
-
121
: : -2 )5-4(
1 81.936 0.78 4.0968 .
8 11
17 11 79.354 0.78 3.9677 . 2 3
.3.9309 0.83 78.618
12 20
10 7 82.672 0.81 4.1336 . 4 7 5 84.24 0.76 4.2120 . 5 5 3 84.792 0.73 4.2396 . 6 7
. 4.2028 0.78 84.056
6 8
14 10 80.646 0.81 4.0323 .) ( 8 12 8 81.936 0.83 4.0968 . 9 ( (SWOT) 10
).3.7143 0.87 74.286
16 29
21 13 78.284 0.77 3.9124 . 11 12
. 4.2949 0.70 85.898
2 4
13 84.7 0.83 4.2350 .
4 6
14 22 14 77.696 0.82 3.8848 25 15 75.944 0.77 3.7972 . 15 16
. 4.3733 0.80 87.466
1 2
-
122
: :
: " ) 16( - %).87.466( "
: " ) 12( - %).85.898( "
" ": ) 6( - %).84.792(
: ) ( -1 . -2
. . -3 -4
. . -5 . -6
( )Baloglu&Others,2008( )2007
)2008( ) 2008 (
)Cohn,1999( . :
: " ": ) 14( -
.%)77.696( " " : ) 15( -
.%)75.944(
-
123
( (SWOT) ": ) 10( - .%)74.286( ")
: . -
. - -
. -
. . -
)2008 ( ) 2008(
.
-
124
: -3 )5-5(
55 11 61.382 0.80 3.0691 . - 1 2
. 3.3041 0.86 66.082
10 52
46 7 69.4 0.78 3.4700 . 3 8 68.388 0.84 3.4194 . 4 13 1 80.738 0.93 4.0369 . 5 27 3 75.208 0.82 3.7604 . 6 7
. 3.7235 0.84 74.47
4 28
16 2 79.54 0.84 3.9770 . 8 36 5 71.61 0.84 3.5806 . 9 42 6 70.046 0.83 3.5023 . 10 51 9 66.176 0.90 3.3088 . 11
:
" : " ) 5( - %).80.738(
" : " ) 8( - %).79.54(
" ": ) 6( - %).75.208(
-
125
) ( ). (
.
. .
: . -1 . -2 . -3 . -4) 2003( )2006( )Hauser,2004(
)Henkin& Others,2007( .
: :
" " ) 11( -)66.176(%. " : ) 2( -
.%)66.082( " " - " : ) 1( -
%).61.382(
) O`nora O`Neill( . .
-
126
- .
. )Wan,2005(
. : -5
)5-6(
1 1 87.834 0.73 4.3917 ). ( 1 31 8 73.364 0.77 3.6682 . 2 38 9 71.06 0.78 3.5530 . 3 9 3 82.85 0.80 4.1429 . 4 19 6 78.802 0.88 3.9401 . 5 45 11 69.58 0.77 3.4793 . 6 3 2 86.82 0.72 4.3410 . 7 39 10 70.968 0.83 3.5484 . 8 26 7 75.668 0.87 3.7834 . 9 18 5 78.894 0.86 3.9447 . 10 53 12 65.89 0.85 3.2949 . 11 15 4 79.908 0.97 3.9954 . 12
: :
") ( : " ) 1( - %).87.834(
-
127
" : " ) 7( - %).86.82( "
" ": ) 4( -)82.85.(%
. . :
. . :
. .
: . - . - . -
)Prawit, 2008( .
. )Alsburg & Hackmann, 2006( ) Cohn, 1999(
. :
: " " : ) 8( -
.%)70.968( " " : ) 6( -
.%)69.58(
-
128
" ": ) 11( - .%) 65.89(
: . -1 . -2 . -3
: ( " :
) 0.05 - ( " "
.") - - " :
) 0.05( ( " "
.") - - - (Independent-Sample T-Test)) (
:) 5-7(
-
129
)5-7( ) (
""
172 59.1 10.7
11.7 47.9 45 6.1
172 72.4 7.2
10.2 55.7 45 12.5
172 53.8 6.6
9.5 41.7 45 9.8
4.9 48.1 172 8.1 38.1 45
10.3
172 233.62 24.58
36.54 183.55 45
10.88
1.65 ) 0.05( 215 " " ) ( ) (
) 0.05(
.
" "
-
130
( " " ) - - -
.
)2007(
)2002(
) 2007 (
.
: ( " :
" " ) 0.05 ) - - - ( ).(
: : " -1
" ) 0.05( - - - ( " ).( )
(Independent-Sample T-Test)) ( ) (
" " )( ) - - - (
: )5-8(
-
131
) ( ) 5-8( ) (
""
11.03 61.3 82
90
57.2 10.1 2.5
7.4 73.5 82
6.9 71.4 90 1.9
6.1 55.9 82
6.4 51.8 90 4.2
5.7 48.3 82 4.1 47.9 90
0.52
25.3 239.2 82 22.8 228.4 90
2.9
1.65 ) 0.05( 170 " " ) ( ) (
) - - (
) ( )( ) - - (
. :
-1
. -2
-
132
- - .
( )2008 ( ) 2007 ( )2006 ( )2007
. ) ( ) ( )(
) ( . " " ) (
( )....
) (
. : " -2
" ) 0.05( - - - ( " ). - -( )
)one way ANOVA( :) 5-9(
-
133
)5-9( " "
) (
) (
189.3 2 378.7 115.03 169 19441.2
171 19820.04 1.646
137.7 2 275.5 51.4 169 8699.09
171 8974.6
2.676
50.1 2 100.2
43.885 169 7416.5
171 7516.7
1.142
1.4 2 2.9 25.2 169 4261.8
171 4264.7
0.059
2143.7 2 1071.8
101250.6 169 599.1
171 103394.4
1.78
)3= ()2169( ) 0.05 ( ) (
) ( ) 1.78( ) ( ) 5-8( ) 0.05( ) 3( (
.) " "
- - (
-
134
) - :
) - -( . .
. ." "
. . )2001 (
)2008 ( )2007 ( )2006( )2002( .
: " -3
" " ) 0.05( ) - - - (
). 10 10-6 5-1( ) one way ANOVA(
: )5-10(
-
135
)5-10( -1( " "
) 10 10-6 5
) (
543.04 2 1086.09 110.8 169 18733.9
171 19820.04
2.6
70.3 2 140.7 52.2 169 8833.9
171 8974.6
1.39
228.7 2 457.5
41.7 169 7059.1
171 7516.7
2.24
71.05 2 142.1 24.3 169 4122.6
171 4264.72
2.79
2873.3 2 5746.7
97647.6 169 577.7
171 103394.4
2.87
)3( =)169 2( ) 0.05( ) (
) 2.87( ) ( )3( ) (
10-6 5-1( .) 10
: -1
.
-
136
-2 .
). ( -3 ( )2006 (
) 2008( )2007 .
) 1999( .
:
" ": - - - ( " " )
" ) - - - (
.
-
137
. ) 5-11( )5-11(
1 ". "
75%
" " 2 .
69%
3 .
66%
%53 . 4 %50 . 5 %46 . 6 %30 . 7 8
25%
9 .
24%
10 .
20%
%17 . 11
" "
.
: ) 11(
-
138
: " %) 75( ) 1( -1 "
".
.
. -
) SWOT( .
.
. ": %)69( ) 2( -2
". " "
- .
.
. " "
. ": %)66( ) 3( -3
".
.
-
139
.
-
140
. :
-1 . -
. ) SWOT( -2 . -3 . -4 . -5 -6
. . -7 . -8 . -9
" -10 . "
. -11
: :
-1 .
-2 .
-
141
: :
) ( -1
www.kau.edu.sa/e-books/thaqafa/communication skills_part6.pdf- ): 2007( -2
. 1 ):2006( -3
. ):2000( -4
. ): 2008( -5
. ")2007( -6
" . 30-31
):2000( -7 .
. ):1994( -8 ): 2007( -9
. ):2003( -10
. ): 2009( -11
.
):2008( -12 .
http://www.kau.edu.sa/e-books/thaqafa/communication -
142
):2005( -13 .
- ):2004( -14 .
: ):1999( -15 .
):1987( -16 .
): 2004( -17 . 1
): 2002( -18 .
: ): 2005( -19 .
): 2001( -20 .
)9001( ): 2007( -21 .
)) 9001(( ): 2004( -22
. :)2004( -23
.122_121 7 ):2006( -24
- ).2007(1002-9554221
): 2005( -25 .
-
143
): 2006( -26 .
): 2000( -27 .
): 1995( -28 .38-35
. ): 2003( -29 : ): 2002( -30
.105 -55 2 18 ): 2006( -31
. 1 ):1992( -32
. ): 2003( -33
. ):2004( -34
.113 1 1 ): 2004( -35 . )Ed.1/2003( ):1987( -36
. 277414 ):2007( -37
31-30 .
. ): 2000( -38 ):2005( -39
. . 2 ): 2001( -40
-
144
): 2007( -41 .
): 2007( -42 .
): 2000( -43 .77 2 13
): 2006( -44 .
):2002( -45
. ):1991( -46
. ):2008( -47
. ):2003( -48
. : ): 2005( -49
. ):2007( -50
. 31-30
" " ):2006( -51
.. . ):( -52
- www. Kaau.org/attachment.php/11868d 3 ): 2008( -53
.
-
145
):2002( -54 .
. ):2000( - ):2002( -55
.35-3 105 1 ): 2004( -56
. : ): 2001( -57
.470-42543
): 2005( -58 -185 2 58
214. . ): 2001( -59 ):2007( -60
. 30-30
): 2007( -61
( 242-207 5 2008.(
. 1 ):2004( -62 12 ): 1990( -63 . 54 2
. )5(" :)1984 ( -64 ):2008( -65
. ): 2006( -66
.
-
146
):1998( -67 ) (
.331-289 2 17 . ): 2007( -68
: - www.imamu:edu.sa/ management-of-university/managements.
. )