ilca : in-line coagulation and adsorption for pre

25
AMTA/AWWA © 1 ILCA ® : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre-treatment to Ceramic Microfiltration R. Floris, H. Shorney-Darby, G. Galjaard, J. Zheng PWN Technologies, the Netherlands

Upload: others

Post on 04-Feb-2022

16 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 1

ILCA®: In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for

Pre-treatment to Ceramic Microfiltration

R. Floris, H. Shorney-Darby, G. Galjaard, J. ZhengPWN Technologies, the Netherlands

Page 2: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 2

Acknowledgements

• PWN Water Supply Company North-Holland, Netherlands

• Metawater, Japan

• RWB, Netherlands

• Het Waterlaboratorium, Netherlands

• Rob Kooijman PWNT, Netherlands

Page 3: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 3

Background

Page 4: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 4

Water source challenge

• most Provence below sea level

• Salty groundwater

• IJssel Lake only available

source

• dominantly fed by the river

Rhine

• under the influence of industry,

recreation, population

• high contamination level (delta

of Europe)

Page 5: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 5

Water treatment line

Micro-sieves

IJssel Lake

Softening

Microstrainers

Ion Exchange

Ceramic Microfiltration

UV / H2O2

GAC

Page 6: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 6

SIX® Suspended Ion Exchange

Micro-sieves

IJssel Lake

Softening

Microstrainers

SIX

Ceramic Microfiltration

UV / H2O2

GAC

• anion exchange resin (Lewatit S5218)

• concentration 18 ml/l

• contact time 30 minutes

• 30 g/l NaCl for regeneration

Performance evaluation SIX®-CeraMac® in comparison with

conventional pre-treatment techniques for surface water treatment

Galjaard, G., Martijn, B., Koreman, E., Bogosh, M., Malley, J.

DOI: 10.2166/wpt.2011.066

Page 7: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 7

CeraMac® Ceramic Microfiltration

Micro-sieves

IJssel Lake

Softening

Microstrainers

SIX

Ceramic Microfiltration

UV / H2O2

GAC

Support layerSeparation

layer

2.5 mm

Page 8: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 8

DOC removal

Micro-sieves

IJssel Lake

Softening

Microstrainers

Ion Exchange

Ceramic Microfiltration

UV / H2O2

GAC

Page 9: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 9

Water quality changes

Page 10: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 10

Additional step for fouling control

Micro-sieves

IJssel Lake

Softening

Microstrainers

Ion Exchange

Ceramic Microfiltration

UV / H2O2

GAC

Membrane pre-coating

Enhanced pre-coat engineering (EPCE) for micro- and ultrafiltration: The solution

for fouling?

Galjaard et al, Water Science and Technology: Water Supply 2001

• In-line coagulation

• Coagulant FeCl3• NaOH used for pH correction

• 6 ppm as Fe @ pH 8

Page 11: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 11

Pre-coating mechanism model

Page 12: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 12

Objectives

• Feasibility of pre-coating for additional fouling

control for ceramic microfiltration of surface water

• Comparison of conventional in-line coagulation

system with the ILCA®

Page 13: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 13

In-line tank coagulation/flocculation

(TC)

• Volume 0.9 m3 (243 gal)

• Contact time 18 minutes

1. pH correction

2. coagulant dosing

3. flocculation(115 and 70 rpm)

1

23

coagulation tankSIX effluent

pH correction coagulant

Ceramic Microfiltration feed

Page 14: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 14

In-Line Coagulation Adsorber

(ILCA®)

• Volume 0.18 m3 (48 gal)

• Contact time 3.6 minutes

• Plug-flow conditions

• Specifically designed

mixing inserts

Flow

[m3/h]

G-value

[s-1]

Contact

time [s]

GT value

[-]

3 65 223 14521

4 97 165 16005

5 135 132 17820

6 178 110 19580

6.5 200 102 20400

7 224 95 21280

Page 15: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 15

Filtration conditions

• 1st phase: influence of filtration flux on membrane

operation at 90,150 and 200 l/m2/h (52.9, 88.2 and 118

g/ft2/d) [TC]

• 2nd phase: influence of filtration time @ 120 l/m2/h (70.6

g/ft2/d) [TC]

• 3rd phase: comparison of TC and ILCA systems @ 120

l/m2/h (70.6 g/ft2/d) and 60 minutes BW interval

Page 16: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 16

Cleaning regime

• filtration load until backwash (BW)

– 50 l/m2 (1.23 g/ft2) 1st 2nd phase

– 120 l/m2 (2.95 g/ft2) 3rd phase

• chemically enhanced backwash (CEBW) after 19 BWs

– acidic CEBW with oxidant (pH 2.5, 100 mg/l H2O2)

– alkali CEBW (100 mg/l NaOCl)

Page 17: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 17

Pre-coating influence on TMP

Page 18: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 18

Filtration flux influence on TMP

Page 19: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 19

Filtration time influence on TMP

120 l/m2/h (70.6 g/ft2/d)

Page 20: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 20

TMP comparison

120 l/m2/h (70.6 g/ft2/d)

Page 21: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 21

TMP comparison

120 l/m2/h (70.6 g/ft2/d)

Page 22: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 22

TMP after CEBW

120 l/m2/h (70.6 g/ft2/d)

Page 23: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 23

Month TMP development

120 l/m2/h (70.6 g/ft2/d)

Page 24: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 24

DOC fractions

Page 25: ILCA : In-line Coagulation and Adsorption for Pre

AMTA/AWWA © 25

Conclusions

• Pre-coating is a good strategy for fouling control

by biopolymers during MF

• ILCA® is a good alternative to the conventional

TC systems

– It provides comparable ceramic MF operations

– Less footprint and shorter contact time

– Constant GT value independent of the flow

– Easy to scale-up

– No mechanical/moving parts (less maintenance)

– Can be combined with adsorbent