I’m a molecule designer…. Get me out of here!

Peter W Kenny (pwk.pub.2008@gmail.com)

Some things that are hurting Pharma

• Having to exploit targets that are poorly-linked to

human disease

• Inability to predict idiosyncratic toxicity

• Inability to measure free (unbound) physiological

concentrations of drug for remote targets (e.g.

intracellular or on far side of blood brain barrier)

Dans la merde : http://fbdd-lit.blogspot.com/2011/09/dans-la-merde.html

Molecular Design

• Control of behavior of compounds by manipulation of

molecular properties

• Hypothesis-driven or prediction-driven

• Sampling of chemical space

– Does fragment-based screening allow better control of

sampling resolution?

Achtung!Spitfire!

Prediction-driven design: Ju 87 Stuka

Stuka on wikipedia

“Why can’t we pray for something good, like a tighter bombing pattern, for example? Couldn’t we pray for a tighter bombing pattern?” , Heller, Catch 22, 1961

Hypothesis-driven design: B52 Stratofortress

B52 on wikipedia

Do1 Do2

Ac1

Kenny (2009) JCIM 49:1234-1244 DOI

Illustrating hypothesis-driven design

DNA Base Isosteres: Acceptor & Donor Definitions

Watson-Crick Donor & Acceptor Electrostatic Potentials for

Adenine IsosteresV

min

(Ac1)

Va (Do1)

Kenny (2009) JCIM 49:1234-1244 DOI

The lurking menace of correlation inflation

Kenny & Montanari (2013) JCAMD 27:1-13 DOI

r

N 1202

R 0.247 ( 95% CI: 0.193 | 0.299)

N 8

R 0.972 ( 95% CI: 0.846 | 0.995)

Correlation Inflation in FlatlandSee Lovering, Bikker & Humblet (2009) JMC 52:6752-6756 DOI

Kenny & Montanari (2013) JCAMD 27:1-13 DOI

Choosing octanol was the first mistake...

Polarity

NClogP ≤ 5 Acc ≤ 10; Don ≤5

An alternative view of the Rule of 5

Does octanol/water ‘see’ hydrogen bond donors?

--0.06 -0.23 -0.24

--1.01 -0.66

Sangster lab database of octanol/water partition coefficients: http://logkow.cisti.nrc.ca/logkow/index.jsp

--1.05

Octanol/Water Alkane/Water

Octanol/water is not the only partitioning system

logPoct = 2.1

logPalk = 1.9

DlogP = 0.2

logPoct = 1.5

logPalk = -0.8

DlogP = 2.3

logPoct = 2.5

logPalk = -1.8

DlogP = 4.3

Differences in octanol/water and alkane/water logP values

reflect hydrogen bonding between solute and octanol

Toulmin et al (2008) J Med Chem 51:3720-3730 DOI

DlogP = 0.5

PSA/ Å2 = 48

Polar Surface Area is not predictive of

hydrogen bond strength

DlogP = 4.3

PSA/ Å2 = 22

Toulmin et al (2008) J Med Chem 51:3720-3730 DOI

-0.054

-0.086-0.091

-0.072

-0.104 -0.093

Hydrogen bonding of esters

Toulmin et al (2008) J Med Chem 51:3720-3730 DOI

DlogP

(corrected)

Vmin/(Hartree/electron)

DlogP

(corrected)

Vmin/(Hartree/electron)

N or ether OCarbonyl O

Prediction of contribution of acceptors to DlogP

DlogP = DlogP0 x exp(-kVmin)

Toulmin et al (2008) J Med Chem 51:3720-3730 DOI

Basis for ClogPalk model

log

Pa

lk

MSA/Å2

Kenny, Montanari & Propopczyk et al (2013) JCAMD 27:389-402 DOIKenny, Montanari & Propopczyk et al (2013) JCAMD 27:389-402 DOI

𝐶𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑃𝑎𝑙𝑘 = 𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑃0 + 𝑠 ×𝑀𝑆𝐴 −

𝑖

∆𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑃𝐹𝐺,𝑖 −

𝑗

∆𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑃𝐼𝑛𝑡,𝑗

ClogPalk from perturbation of saturated hydrocarbon

logPalk predicted

for saturated

hydrocarbonPerturbation by

functional groups

Perturbation by

interactions

between

functional groups

Kenny, Montanari & Propopczyk et al (2013) JCAMD 27:389-402 DOI

Performance of ClogPalk model

Hydrocortisone

Cortisone

(logPalk ClogPalk)/2

log

Pa

lk

Clo

gP

alk

AtropinePropanolol

Papavarlne

Kenny, Montanari & Propopczyk et al (2013) JCAMD 27:389-402 DOI

Another way to look at SAR?

(Descriptor-based) QSAR/QSPR:

Some questions

• How valid is methodology (especially for validation)

when distribution of compounds in training/test space

is highly non-uniform?

• Are models predicting activity or locating neighbours?

• To what extent are ‘global’ models just ensembles of

local models?

• How well do the methods handle ‘activity cliffs’?

• How should we account for sizes of descriptor pools

when comparing model performance?

Measures of Diversity & Coverage

•• •

•

••

•

•

•

••

•

••

•

2-Dimensional representation of chemical space is used here to illustrate concepts of diversity

and coverage. Stars indicate compounds selected to sample this region of chemical space.

In this representation, similar compounds are close together

Neighborhoods and library design

Examples of relationships between structures

Tanimoto coefficient (foyfi) for structures is 0.90

Ester is methylated acid Amides are ‘reversed’

Leatherface molecular editor

From chain saw to Matched Molecular Pairs

c-[A;!R]

bnd 1 2

c-Br

cul 2

hyd 1 1

[nX2]1c([OH])cccc1

hyd 1 1

hyd 3 -1

bnd 2 3 2

Kenny & Sadowski Structure modification in chemical databases, Methods and Principles in Medicinal

Chemistry (Chemoinformatics in Drug Discovery 2005, 23, 271-285 DOI

Glycogen Phosphorylase inhibitors:

Series comparison

DpIC50

DlogFu

DlogS

0.38 (0.06)

-0.30 (0.06)

-0.29 (0.13)

DpIC50

DlogFu

DlogS

0.21 (0.06)

0.13 (0.04)

0.20 (0.09)

DpIC50

DlogFu

DlogS

0.29 (0.07)

-0.42 (0.08)

-0.62 (0.13)

Standard errors in mean values in parenthesis; see Birch et al (2009) BMCL 19:850-853 DOI

Effect of bioisosteric replacement

on plasma protein binding

?

Date of Analysis N DlogFu SE SD %increase

2003 7 -0.64 0.09 0.23 0

2008 12 -0.60 0.06 0.20 0

Mining PPB database for carboxylate/tetrazole pairs suggested that bioisosteric

replacement would lead to decrease in Fu so tetrazoles were not synthesised.

Birch et al (2009) BMCL 19:850-853 DOI

-0.316

-0.315

-0.296

-0.295

Bioisosterism: Carboxylate & tetrazole

-0.262

-0.261

-0.268

-0.268

Kenny (2009) JCIM 49:1234-1244 DOI

Amide N DlogS SE SD %Increase

Acyclic (aliphatic amine) 109 0.59 0.07 0.71 76

Cyclic 9 0.18 0.15 0.47 44

Benzanilides 9 1.49 0.25 0.76 100

Effect of amide N-methylation on aqueous solubility

is dependent on substructural context

Birch et al (2009) BMCL 19:850-853 DOI

Relationships between structures

Discover new

bioisosteres &

scaffolds

Prediction of activity &

properties

Recognise

extreme data

Direct

prediction

(e.g. look up

substituent

effects)

Indirect

prediction

(e.g. apply

correction to

existing model)

Bad

measurement

or interesting

effect?

MUDO Molecule Editor

• SMIRKS-based re-write of Leatherface using

OEChem

• Can process 3D structures (e.g. form covalent bond

between protein and ligand)

• Identification of matched molecular pairs is much

easier than with Leatherface

• Submitted (source code in supplemental information):

– Kenny, Montanari, Propopczyk, Sala, Rodrigues Sartori

(2013) Automated molecule editing in molecular design.

JCAMD (submitted)

Stuff to think about

• Data can be massaged and correlations can

be enhanced but it won’t extract us from ‘la

merde’

• There is life beyond octanol/water (and atom-

centered charges) if we choose to look for it

• Even molecules can have meaningful

relationships