“i’m not telling you it is going to be easy, i’m ... · pdf filenursing...
TRANSCRIPT
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 1
Karen Marzlin DNP, RN, CCNS, ACNPC-AG, CCRN-CMC, CHFN Cynthia Webner DNP, RN, CCNS, ACNPC-AG, CCRN-CMC, CHFN
1
2
“I’m not telling you it
is going to be easy, I’m
telling you it is going
to be worth it.”
~ Art Williams
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 2
• Offered by the American Association of Heart Failure Nurses – AAHFN
• Requirements: – Current active RN License for at least 2 years or
equivalent (4,160 hours)
– 1,200 of those hours within the past 2 years
– 30 hours of continuing education within the past 2 years
• Minimum of 15 hours must be focused on the care of patients with heart failure
3
• Developed for nurses no longer in the direct care of patients with heart failure but still impact the heart failure population. – Educators, researchers, Industry reps
• RN with a BSN or equivalent bachelors degree + 2400 hours experience in current role or Masters + 2080 hours experience in current role
• Provide evidence of how nurses are indirectly involved in patients with HF or how nurses complete action(s) in their role that are related to HF
• Must have 30 hours of heart failure continuing education within the last two years.
• Same exam as the CHFN
4
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 3
• Computer based testing offered 1st, 3rd and 4th quarter of the year.
• Pen and paper test offered at the annual meeting (2nd quarter)
• 100 test questions
• Based off 2013 ACC/AHA Heart Failure Guidelines
5
• Active RN license and current HF Certification
• Minimum of 600 hours in hands on heart failure clinical practice
• 40 hours of CE (past 3 years) focused on heart failure
• Complete one of the following
– Publish one CV manuscript in peer-reviewed journal as 1st author
OR
6
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 4
Completed 2 of the following or 1 of the following 2 times: • Published 1 clinical/professional article in a cardiovascular newsletter • Provided a formal lecture (1 hr) on a cardiovascular topic • Developed a program, service, or tool that is used in the
management of patients with heart failure • After submitting an abstract and having it accepted by a peer-review
process, presented a poster on a heart failure care topic at a local, regional, or national conference
• Earned 3 academic (college) credits in topics related to professional nursing
• Served in a leadership role with a professional society (committee, task force, board service)
• Actively participated in a quality improvement project related to heart failure care
• Co-author of a published cardiovascular manuscript (not first author) • 10 hours of continuing education in topics focused on care of
patients with heart failure within the last three years (note, this is in addition to the 40 hour minimum requirement)
7
• Active RN license and current HF Certification
• Minimum of 600 hours in hands on heart failure clinical practice
• 30 hours of CE (past 3 years) with 15 hours focused on heart failure
8
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 5
I. Assessment 32 Questions A. History
B. Symptoms
C. Physical Assessment
D. Lab Tests
E. Cardiac / Pulmonary Tests
II. Planning 7 Questions A. ACC/AHA Staging and NYHA Functional Class
B. Integrate assessment into the plan of care
9
I. Implementation 41 Questions A. Pharmacologic Treatment B. Non –pharmacologic Strategies C. Recommended Patient Referrals
II. Evaluation 12 Questions A. Evaluate effectiveness of therapies B. Evaluate effectiveness of teaching
III. Professional Items 8 Questions A. Demonstrate professionalism B. Maintain and improve performance
10
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 6
11
• 20% of American > 40 will develop HF in their lifetime
• > 650,000 new cases are diagnosed annually • 6.5 million people in US have HF (AHA Heart Disease and
Stroke Statistics 2017)
• Incidence increases with age – 20/1,000 people age 65-69 – > 80/1,000 people > 85 years
• Projected to increase to 8 million by 2030 • 8.5 of deaths annually in US are attributable to
HF
12 Source:
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 7
• Blacks have highest risk for HF
– Associated with a greater 5 year mortality than whites
• Lowest rate of HF among white women
• Mortality rate still 50% at 5 years from diagnosis
• HF is primary diagnosis in > 1 million hospitalizations annually
• 1 month readmission rate 25%
• Total cost of HF care annually > $30 billion
13
14
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 8
• Heart Failure is a complex clinical syndrome resulting from any structural or functional cardiac disorder impairing the ability of the ventricle to either fill or eject
15
• Dyspnea and fatigue – May limit exercise tolerance
• Fluid overload
– May lead to pulmonary congestion and peripheral edema
AND / OR
Impaired functional capacity and quality of life 16
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 9
• Dilated Cardiomyopathies (DCM)
• Familial Cardiomyopathies – 20-35% of idiopathic DCM
• Endocrine / Metabolic – Obesity – Diabetic – Thyroid – Acromegaly / Growth
Hormone Deficiency
• Toxic Cardiomyopathies – Alcoholic – Cocaine – Related to cancer treatments – Other toxins
• Sarcoidosis
• Tachycardia- Induced Cardiomyopathy
• Myocarditis and Inflammatory Processes – Myocarditis – Acquired Immunodeficiency
Syndrome – Chagas disease
• Inflamation-Induced CM: Non-infectious – Hypersensitivity Myocarditis – Rheumatological/Connective
Tissue Disorders
• Peripartum CM • CM due to Iron overload • Amyloidosis 17
DEFINITIONS
18
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 10
Definition of Heart Failure
Classification Ejection
Fraction Description
I. Heart Failure with
Reduced Ejection
Fraction (HFrEF)
≤40% Also referred to as systolic HF. Randomized clinical trials have
mainly enrolled patients with HFrEF and it is only in these
patients that efficacious therapies have been demonstrated to
date.
II. Heart Failure
with Preserved
Ejection Fraction
(HFpEF)
≥50% Also referred to as diastolic HF. Several different criteria have
been used to further define HFpEF. The diagnosis of HFpEF is
challenging because it is largely one of excluding other potential
noncardiac causes of symptoms suggestive of HF. To date,
efficacious therapies have not been identified.
a. HFpEF,
Borderline
41% - 49% These patients fall into a borderline or intermediate group. Their
characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes appear similar to
those of patient with HFpEF.
b. HFpEF
Improved
>40% It has been recognized that a subset of patients with HFpEF
previously had HFrEF. These patients with improvement or
recovery in EF may be clinically distinct from those with
persistently preserved or reduced EF. Further research is needed
to better characterize these patients. 19
20
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 11
• Impaired wall motion and ejection
• Dilated chamber
• 50% of HF Population
• Hallmark: Decreased LV Ejection Fraction < 40%
• Coronary artery disease is cause in 2/3 of patients
• Remainder – other causes of LV dysfunction
Cardiomyopathy not synonymous with HF 21
• Filling impairment • Normal chamber size • 50% of patients with HF
have preserved LV function
• Normal EF or elevated • Caused by
– Hypertension – Restrictive myopathy (C) – Ischemic heart disease – Ventricular hypertrophy (D) – Valve disease – Idiopathic
Primarily disease of elderly women with HTN 22
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 12
• Diagnosis is made when rate of ventricular filling is slow
• Elevated left ventricular filling pressures when volume and contractility are normal
IN PRACTICE: The diagnosis is made when a patient has has typical signs and symptoms of heart failure and has a normal or elevated
ejection fraction with no valve disease.
23
Stages, Phenotypes and Treatment of HF
STAGE AAt high risk for HF but
without structural heart
disease or symptoms of HF
STAGE BStructural heart disease
but without signs or
symptoms of HF
THERAPY
Goals
· Control symptoms
· Improve HRQOL
· Prevent hospitalization
· Prevent mortality
Strategies
· Identification of comorbidities
Treatment
· Diuresis to relieve symptoms
of congestion
· Follow guideline driven
indications for comorbidities,
e.g., HTN, AF, CAD, DM
· Revascularization or valvular
surgery as appropriate
STAGE CStructural heart disease
with prior or current
symptoms of HF
THERAPYGoals· Control symptoms· Patient education· Prevent hospitalization· Prevent mortality
Drugs for routine use· Diuretics for fluid retention· ACEI or ARB· Beta blockers· Aldosterone antagonists
Drugs for use in selected patients· Hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate· ACEI and ARB· Digoxin
In selected patients· CRT· ICD· Revascularization or valvular
surgery as appropriate
STAGE DRefractory HF
THERAPY
Goals
· Prevent HF symptoms
· Prevent further cardiac
remodeling
Drugs
· ACEI or ARB as
appropriate
· Beta blockers as
appropriate
In selected patients
· ICD
· Revascularization or
valvular surgery as
appropriate
e.g., Patients with:
· Known structural heart disease and
· HF signs and symptoms
HFpEF HFrEF
THERAPY
Goals
· Heart healthy lifestyle
· Prevent vascular,
coronary disease
· Prevent LV structural
abnormalities
Drugs
· ACEI or ARB in
appropriate patients for
vascular disease or DM
· Statins as appropriate
THERAPYGoals· Control symptoms· Improve HRQOL· Reduce hospital
readmissions· Establish patient’s end-
of-life goals
Options· Advanced care
measures· Heart transplant· Chronic inotropes· Temporary or permanent
MCS· Experimental surgery or
drugs· Palliative care and
hospice· ICD deactivation
Refractory symptoms of HF at rest, despite GDMT
At Risk for Heart Failure Heart Failure
e.g., Patients with:
· Marked HF symptoms at
rest
· Recurrent hospitalizations
despite GDMT
e.g., Patients with:
· Previous MI
· LV remodeling including
LVH and low EF
· Asymptomatic valvular
disease
e.g., Patients with:
· HTN
· Atherosclerotic disease
· DM
· Obesity
· Metabolic syndrome
or
Patients
· Using cardiotoxins
· With family history of
cardiomyopathy
Development of
symptoms of HFStructural heart
disease
24
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 13
• At high risk for HF but without structural heart disease or symptoms of HF
• Hypertension
• CAD
• Diabetes
• Obesity
• Metabolic Syndrome
OR
• Using cardiotoxins
• Family history of Cardiomyopathy
25
• Structural heart disease but without signs or symptoms of HF
• Previous myocardial infarction
• LV remodeling including left ventricular hypertrophy and low ejection fraction
• Asymptomatic valvular heart disease
26
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 14
• Structural heart disease with prior or current symptoms of HF
• Known structural heart disease and HF signs and symptoms
27
• Refractory HF • Marked HF symptoms at rest
• Recurrent hospitalizations despite Guideline Directed Medical Therapy
28
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 15
I
No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause symptoms of HF.
II
Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest, but ordinary physical activity results in symptoms of HF.
III
Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest, but less than ordinary activity causes symptoms of HF.
IV Unable to carry on any physical activity without symptoms of HF, or symptoms of HF at rest.
29
I No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause fatigue, palpitations or shortness of breath.
II Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest, but physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation or shortness of breath.
IIIa Limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest, but ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitations or shortness of breath
IIIb Significant limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest, but minimal activity causes fatigue, palpitations or shortness of breath.
IV Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort or symptoms of HF at rest. 30
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 16
31
• Two sides of the heart form a circuit, neither side can pump significantly more blood than the other for long
• Signs/symptoms of failure reflect each respective ventricle
32
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 17
The Real Culprit: Neurohormonal Response
SNS Response
RAAS Response
33
Autonomic Nervous System
Sympathetic
Beta 1
HR
Contractility
Conductivity
Beta 2
Bronchodilation
Arterial Vasodilation
Alpha 1 Arterial
Vasoconstriction
Parasympathetic Vagal Response HR 34
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 18
• First Responder – Decreased CO → ↓ BP → activates baroreceptors and vasomotor
regulatory centers in medulla
• Increase circulating catecholamines – Stimulates alpha and beta receptors
• Increase HR
• Peripheral vasoconstriction
• Contractility Positive effect: ↑ CO and BP
Negative effect: ↑ O2 demand → ischemia, arrhythmias, sudden death
35
• Norepinephrine (circulating catecholamine) is Cardiotoxic Decreases heart’s ability to respond to sympathetic
stimulation
Down regulation of B1 receptor sites (less sensitive)
Contributes to decreased exercise tolerance
Can also lead to ventricular remodeling
Be aware of your patient’s heart rate response to activity.
36
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 19
• Kidney’s response to decreased perfusion due to decreasing CO
• Concentrations of angiotensin II, and aldosterone rise as end result – Potent vasoconstriction
– Sodium/water absorption increases
• Result – Increased preload and increased afterload
– Increased myocardial oxygen demand
37
38
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 20
• Enhanced preload increases end-diastolic volume dilating the LV
• LV becomes overstretched
• LV changes size and shape (ventricular remodeling)
• Contractility decreases • Congestive symptoms
develop 39
• Process of pathological growth
• Can occur from prolonged activation of SNS/RAAS
• Involves Hypertrophy of myocytes
Increased Pressure Thicken myocytes (concentric)
Increased Volume Elongate myocytes(eccentric)
40
Eccentric Hypertrophy
Concentric Hypertrophy
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 21
Preprogrammed cell death without inflammation/scarring (necrosis)
Process is accelerated in HF but in a random pattern
Cell slippage
Bricks – myocytes
Morter – collagen Degredation (slippage) or
Fibrotic 41
Symptoms
Fluid Accumulates in Pulmonary Capillary Bed
Increased Pulmonary Pressure / Volume
Atrial Overload
Atrial Dilatation
Increased Atrial Pressure / Volume
Increased Ventricular Pressure / Volume
Decreased Ejection of Ventricular Contents
Decreased Ventricular Contractility
Ventricular Dilatation
Changes in Systolic Dysfunction
Mitral Regurgitation
Dilated Mitral Valve Annulus
Vasoconstriction / Fluid Retention
Activation of Neuro- hormonal Responses
42
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 22
Cardiac hormones secreted by myocytes Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP)
Produced in atria
Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) Produced in ventricles in response to increased ventricular
pressure/stretching Stronger release than ANP
Promote vasodilatation (preload/afterload reduction)
Reduce sodium/water retention (diuretic response)
Reduce production/action of vasoconstrictor peptides
Plasma concentrations elevated in patients in fluid overload
Neseritide (Natrecor) is the synthetic form of BNP
43
RV Dysfunction Secondary to LV Dysfunction
• Chronic left HF is most common cause of RV failure – RV dysfunction more common in non ischemic etiology – RVEF is a predictor of mortality in patients with left HF
• LV failure leads to increased RV afterload – first from elevated pulmonary venous pressures then ultimately elevated pulmonary artery pressures
• Same pathophysiology resulting in LV failure may affect RV • Ischemia may affect both ventricles • LV dysfunction may lead to decreased systolic driving pressure
of RV coronary perfusion • Ventricular interdependence due to septal dysfunction may
occur • LV dilatation in a confined pericardial space may restrict RV
diastolic function 44
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 23
Pathophysiology of Right Ventricular Failure
• In response to increased pulmonary artery (PA) pressures – Initial adaptive hypertrophy; followed by progressive
contractile dysfunction
– Chamber enlargement allows for compensation for increased preload and maintenance of stroke volume (SV)
– Pulmonary hypertension may cause • RV ischemia
• Microvascular endothelial cellular dysfunction
• Apoptosis of myocytes
45
Pressure Overload
Volume Overload Ischemia and
Infarction
Intrinsic Myocardial
Disease
● Left sided HF ● Mitral stenosis ●Pulmonary embolus ●Other causes of
pulmonary hypertension
● Tricuspid regurgitation ● Pulmonic regurgitation ● Mitral regurtitation ● Atrial septal defect
● RV myocardial infarction (RV is very resistant to irreversible ischemia, can regain systolic function)
● HF ● Arrhythmogenic RV
dysplasia ● Sepsis
Inflow Limitation
Congenital Pericardial
Disease
● Tricuspid stenosis ● Ebstein's anomaly ● Tetralogy of Fallot ● Transposition of great
arteries
● Constrictive pericarditis
Causes of Right Heart Failure (Examples)
46
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 24
Response to Failing RV
• Neurohormonal, endothelin and cytokine activation
– SNS adversely affects RV remodeling
– RAAS activation affects RV remodeling and contributes to fluid retention
– Endothelin I levels in pulmonary arterial hypertension are associated with more severe RV dysfunction and decreased exercise capacity
– Increased levels of tumor necrosis factor and endotoxin are associated with more symptomatic disease
47
Decompensated RV Failure
• Rising filling pressures
• Diastolic dysfunction of LV – RV dilation or pressure overload causes leftward shift of
septum and impacts LV function
• Decreased cardiac output – PA pressures may actually decrease in severe RV failure
due to decreased CO of RV
• Tricuspid valve regurgitation – Annular dilatation and poor leaflet coaptation – Aggravates volume overload and further decreases RV
forward flow
48
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 25
Manifestations of RV Failure
• Fluid retention – JVD – + Hepatojugular Reflex – Peripheral edema – Ascites
• Cardiac cirrhosis in severe cases
– Anasarca
• Decreased systolic reserve (decreased C.O.) – Decreased exercise tolerance
• Exercise capacity may be one of most important prognostic factors
– Fatigue
• Cardiac arrhythmias
– Atrial most common
• Protein losing enteropathy
– Severe loss of proteins into the intestine
49
RV Dysfunction and Prognosis
• RV function is the most important determinant of longevity in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)
• In left ventricular failure, RV failure may be final common pathway and thus sensitive indicator for impending decompensation and poor prognosis
• Severity of tricuspid regurgitation correlates with worse survival
50
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 26
51
Exercise intolerance (hallmark) – Assess NYHA Inability to perform ADLs, Fatigue, Dyspnea
Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea attacks of severe shortness of breath and coughing that
generally occur at night. It usually awakens the person from sleep, and may be quite frightening
Orthopnea shortness of breath (dyspnea) which occurs when lying flat
Bendopnea Shortness of breath when bending forward for 30 seconds
Frequent night urination with less during the day Peripheral edema/weight change/increase
abdominal girth Chest pain GI problems Confusion/altered mental status
52
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 27
• Symptoms in the elderly
Many don’t experience exertional dyspnea because they are sedentary
More common:
Daytime oliguria/nocturia
Mental disturbances
Anorexia
GI disturbances
Clinical Pearl: Ask about the last time the patient felt really well. What activities were they doing then?
53
• General Appearance (resting dyspnea, cyanosis, cardiac cachexia)
• Weight gain • JVD • Hepatojugular reflux • Edema • Displaced apical impulse • S3/S4 • BP/HR
– Include orthostatic pressures
• Murmurs – MR, AS, AR • Lung sounds
54
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 28
Preload • The ventricle is preloaded with
blood at the end of diastole: Creates stretch on myocardial muscles fibers
• Determined by: – Volume of blood filling the ventricle at
end of diastole – Greater the volume the greater the
stretch (muscle fiber length) – Greater the stretch the greater the
contraction – Greater the contraction the greater
cardiac output
TO A POINT
55
• JVD • Hepatojugular reflux
• Less specific
– Peripheral edema – Weight
•Dyspnea / increased work of breathings •Hypoxemia (Diffusion abnormality) •Orthopnea / bendopnea (flexopnea) •CXR •BNP / NT-proBNP •Lungs sounds – Role of lymph drainage – Clear lungs do not rule out volume
overload •S3 or S4
•Less specific – Blood Pressure – Urine Output – Weight 56
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 29
Invasive Assessment • RA Pressure
– CVP or Central Venous Pressure
• Direct measurement of pressure in right atrium
• Normal < 6mm Hg
Invasive Assessment
• PCWP – Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure
• Indirect measurement of left atrial pressure
• – Normal < 15 mm HG
57
58
Measuring level of JV Pulsation (JVP)
• Raise HOB 30 – 45 degrees – 45 degree angle will
cause venous pulsation to rise 1 to 3 cm above the sternal angle
• Internal jugular preferred
• May use external
• Use tangential light
• Use centimeter ruler
• Difficult to assess if HR>100
• Normal JVP level is < 3 cm above the sternal angle
• Sternal angle is 5cm above
right atrium • JVP of 3 cm + 5cm =
estimated CVP or right atrial pressure of 8cm H2O
• Estimated CVP / right atrial
pressure > 8 cmH2O – Usually RV failure – Tricuspid valve regurgitation – Pulmonary hypertension
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 30
59
JVD (Jugular Venous Distension)
60
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 31
61
No pulsations palpable. Palpable pulsations.
Pulsations obliterated by pressure above the clavicle.
Pulsations not obliterated by pressure above the clavicle.
Level of pulse wave decreased on inspiration; increased on expiration.
No effects of respiration on pulse.
Usually two pulsations per systole (x and y descents).
One pulsation per systole.
Prominent descents. Descents not prominent.
Pulsations sometimes more prominent with abdominal pressure.
No effect of abdominal pressure on pulsations.
• Additional assessment for increased volume or pressure.
• An evaluation of neck vein distention occurs while assessing HJR so patient position is the same as with JVD assessment.
• Apply firm pressure over the liver (right upper quadrant of the abdomen) for approximately 30 seconds.
• A more pronounced rise in JVD indicates a positive test.
• Positive HJR indicates: – Increased preload/hypervolemia – Right ventricular failure
62
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 32
• Note location of edema
• Edema may be in dependent locations, such as the sacrum in the recumbent patient.
• Evaluate men for scrotal edema.
• Described as pitting or non-pitting
• Anasarca: generalized edema
• Evaluated on a 5-point scale – 0 = No edema present
– 1+ = 0 to ¼ inch, Trace
– 2+ = ¼ to ½ inch, Mild
– 3+ = ½ to 1 inch, Moderate
– 4+ = > than 1 inch, Severe
63
Source: http://www.med-health.net/Edema-Grading.html
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 33
Cardiac Ascites
• Congestive hepatopathy and chronic passive liver congestion are more accurate terms than cardiac cirrhosis – Abnormal PT is common – Most common liver enzyme abnormality is elevated
bilirubin • Abnormalities seen with right atrial pressures > 10 mmHg
– Need to differentiate from ischemic hepatitis • Caused by cardiogenic shock • Associated with more extreme elevations in AST and ALT
• Paracentesis – High serum – ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) greater than
1.1 g/dL – High ascitic fluid total protein > 2.5 g/dL – Hepatic albumin synthetic function is usually preserved so
parental albumin is not necessary
Hepatic Ascites
• Portal HTN in presence of liver cirrhosis – Chronic alcohol use or viral hepatitis
• Hypoalbuminemia usually present • Paracentesis
– High serum – ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) – Only 10% of time have a high ascitic fluid total protein > 2.5
g/dL. – Need for parental albumin supplementation after paracentesis
• Other causes of ascites: Infective, inflammatory and infiltrative conditions
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 34
Edema Differentials
Nephrotic Syndrome
• Nephrotic-range proteinuria • single spot urine: 2 g of protein
per gram of urine creatinine
• Hypoalbuminemia
• Edema
Lymph Edema
• Abnormal collection of protein-rich fluid in the interstitium resulting from obstruction of lymphatic drainage
• Diagnosis based on exclusion of other causes of edema – Heart failure, renal failure,
hepatic failure, and venous stasis.
68
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 35
• Orthostatic hypotension is a systolic fall of at least 20 mm Hg or a diastolic fall of at least 10 mm Hg within three minutes of standing.
• Procedure for assessing orthostatic blood pressure: – All requirements for normal blood pressure assessment should
be followed including cuff size, arm position etc. – Measure lying blood pressure after the patient has been supine
for a minimum of 5 minutes. – Stand the patient. Measure the blood pressure after the patient
has been standing for one minute. – If the patient can continue to stand, measure the blood pressure
at 3 minutes and again at five minutes. – Note any symptoms the patient experiences. – If the patient is unable to stand for 3 minutes measure the
blood pressure at 1 and 2 minutes if able. – Record the blood pressure, any symptoms and the time intervals
of the standing pressures. 69
• Closure of the Mitral (M1) valve and the Tricuspid (T1) valve
• Beginning of Ventricular Systole and Atrial Diastole
• Location: Mitral area
• Intensity: Directly related to force of contraction
• Duration: Short
• Quality: Dull
• Pitch: High
70
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 36
• Closure of Aortic (A2) and Pulmonic (P2) Valve
• End of Ventricular Systole
• Location: Pulmonic area
• Intensity: Directly related to closing pressure in the aorta and pulmonary artery
• Duration: Shorter than S1
• Quality: Booming
• Pitch: High 71
• Early diastolic filling sound
• Caused by increased pressure and resistance to filling.
• Most frequently associated with systolic dysfunction
• Associated with: – Fluid overload state
– Right or left ventricular failure
– Ischemia
– Aortic regurgitation
– Mitral regurgitation
72
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 37
• Patient position: left lateral decubitus position
• Location: – Left-sided S3 – mitral area. – Right-sided S3 – tricuspid area.
• Intensity – Left-sided heard best during
expiration. – Right-sided heard best during
inspiration.
• Duration: short. • Quality: dull, thud like. • Pitch: low. • May be normal in children, young
adults (up to 35-40) and in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy.
73
• Late diastolic filling sound • Caused by atrial contraction and the
propulsion of blood into a noncompliant (stiff) ventricle.
• Most frequently associated with diastolic dysfunction
• Associated with:
– Fluid overload state – Systemic hypertension – Restrictive cardiomyopathy – Ischemia – Aortic stenosis – Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
• May be normal in athletes 74
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 38
• Patient position: left lateral decubitus position.
• Location
– Left-sided S4 – mitral area. – Right-sided S4 – tricuspid
area. • Intensity
– Left-sided louder on expiration.
– Right-sided louder on inspiration.
• Duration: Short • Quality: Thud like • Pitch: Low
75
Afterload
• After the ventricle is loaded: • Pressure ventricle needs to
overcome to eject blood volume
• Systemic vascular resistance is major component of left ventricular afterload – Other components
• Valve compliance • Arterial wall compliance • Viscosity of blood
•Pulmonary vascular resistance is major component of right ventricular afterload
77
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 39
Afterload Assessment
• Left ventricle: –Pulse pressure and
DBP • Normal pulse pressure
35 to 40
• Right ventricle: –Hypoxemia –Positive pressure
ventilation / PEEP
78
Contractility
• Ability of myocardium to contract independent of preload or afterload
–Inotropic state
• Related to degree of myocardial fiber stretch (preload) and wall tension (afterload).
• No accurate way to measure contractility
• Contractility influences myocardial oxygen consumption
79
Noninvasive Assessment: Ejection Fraction
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 40
80
• CBC • UA • Electrolytes – including magnesium and calcium • BUN / Creatinine • Glucose • Fasting lipid profile • Liver function studies • Albumin • Thyroid stimulating hormone
– Diagnose new disease or evaluate the effectiveness of current treatment
• Cardiac Biomarkers: Troponin
BNP / NT proBNP Diagnosis and Prognosis
81
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 41
• Lower levels than NT-pro-BNP
• Cleared more quickly from the circulation – 20 minutes
• Cleared by natriuretic peptide receptors
• Higher levels than BNP
• Cleared more slowly from the circulation- 120 minutes
• Cleared by various organs – Skeletal tissue, liver, kidneys
82
Both equally cleared by kidneys Both equally useful in the diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure Both may be elevated for reasons other than HF
• Good to assess in patients with dyspnea being evaluated for Heart Failure
• Should not be used as the sole tool to diagnose HF
• Must be used in concert with signs and symptoms
• Low values have strong negative predictive value
• Adds to prognostic information – marker of risk
• Predictor of increased risk
– If levels do not fall after aggressive HF care, risk for death or hospitalization for HF is significant (ACC/AHA 2013)
83
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 42
• < 100 pg/mL - HF unlikely
• > 400 pg/mL - HF likely
• 100-400 pg/mL - Use clinical judgment
• < 300 ng/mL - HF unlikely
• Age < 50 years, NT-proBNP >450 pg/mL - HF likely
• Age 50-75 years, NT-proBNP >900 pg/mL – HF likely
• Age >75 years, NT-proBNP >1800 – HF likely
84
Cardiac • Heart failure, including RV
syndromes
• Acute coronary syndrome
• Heart muscle disease, including LV Hypertrophy
• Valvular heart disease
• Pericardial disease
• Atrial fibrillation
• Myocarditis
• Cardiac surgery
Non-cardiac • Advancing age
• Anemia
• Renal failure
• Pulmonary: obstructive sleep
apnea, severe pneumonia,
pulmonary hypertension
• Critical illness
• Bacterial sepsis
• Severe burns
• Toxic-metabolic insults, including
cancer, chemotherapy and
environmental 85
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 43
• Hyponatremia occurs with volume overload
• Hyponatremia occurs with thiazide diuretics / aldosterone antagonists
• Diuretics predispose to hypokalemia
• Aldosterone antagonist are potassium sparing and can increase risk for hyperkalemia – Spironolactone
– Epleranone
• Certain salt substitutes contain potassium
86
• Hypochloremic metabolic alkalosis – Low serum chloride
– High serum CO2
– May result from hypovolemia
• Serum value correlates with the bicarb on an arterial blood gas
• Low serum CO2 can be indicative of metabolic acidosis
• High serum CO2 can be indicative of metabolic alkalosis
• Venus pH can confirm acidosis
87
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 44
• Elevated BUN
• Kidney failure
• Dehydration
• GI bleeding
• Protein catabolism
• Acute kidney injury
– Increase in creatinine of > 0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours
– Increase in creatinine > 1.5 x baseline within last 7 days (known or presumed)
• Creatinine of 2.0 (females) and 2.5
(males) cut off for use of aldosterone antagonists
• Creatinine of 3.0 is general cut off for use of ACE inhibitors / angiotensin receptor blockers in chronic kidney disease (CKD)
88
Diuretics and Renal Function
• Role of venous congestion in worsening renal function
• Role of volume depletion / hypotension and worsening renal function
89
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 45
Cardiorenal Syndrome
• Moderate to severe renal dysfunction with fluid overload
– Continue to treat with diuretics
• In severe fluid overload renal dysfunction my improve with continued treatment
• May need to hold ACE I secondary to AKI
• Venous congestion plays a role in worsening renal function (not just hypoperfusion)
90
MULLENS, W., ABRAHAMS, Z., FRANCIS, G. S., SOKOS, G., TAYLOR, D. O., STARLING, R. C., ... & TANG, W. W. (2009).
IMPORTANCE OF VENOUS CONGESTION FOR WORSENING OF RENAL FUNCTION IN ADVANCED DECOMPENSATED HEART FAILURE. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 53(7), 589-596.
We observed in our patient population with low-output decompensated HF that besides the presence of intrinsic renal insufficiency, venous congestion was the strongest hemodynamic determinant for the development of WRF. In contrast, impaired CI on admission and improvement in CI after intensive medical therapy had a limited contribution to WRF.
91
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 46
Increased CVP is associated with impaired renal function and independently related to all-cause mortality in a broad spectrum of patients with cardiovascular disease.
92
DAMMAN, K., VAN DEURSEN, V. M., NAVIS, G., VOORS, A. A., VAN VELDHUISEN, D. J., & HILLEGE, H. L. (2009). INCREASED CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE IS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTION AND MORTALITY IN A BROAD SPECTRUM OF PATIENTS WITH CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 53(7), 582-588.
• Assess for hyper or hypothyroidism
• Anemia results in decrease oxygen carrying capacity
• Goes hand in hand with renal dysfunction
• Iron studies, ferritin to evaluate for iron deficiency
93
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 47
• May elevate secondary to passive liver congestion
• Passive liver congestion can also lead to alteration in PT/INR
94
• Ischemia
• Arrhythmias
• Hypertrophy
• Drug side effects
• Conduction abnormalities – Bundle branch block
– QT interval
95
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 48
• Chest x-ray
– Assess heart size
– Pulmonary congestion
– Detect alternative cardiac , pulmonary and other diseases that may cause or contribute to the symptoms
96
97
• Prominent vascular markings: upper lung fields
• Kerley B lines
• Peribronchial thickening
• Patchy alveolar filling in a perihilar distribution – progressing to diffuse infiltrates
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 49
98
• LV Function /RV Function
• LV size /RV size
• Wall thickness
• Wall motion
• Valve function
• Atrial size
• Pulmonary artery systolic pressure
• Serial studies important to assess response to therapy
• Routine studies without changes in therapy or condition not recommended
• MRI – LV volume and LVEF
– Myocardial perfusion and viability
– Myocardial fibrosis
– Identify congenital disease
• CT Scan – Cardiac structure & function
– Including coronaries
• Stress test – For those with known CAD
and no angina to assess for ischemia
99
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 50
• Cardiac Catheterization – Patients with high suspicion for obstructive CAD – Rule out CAD as a cause for newly diagnosed LV dysfunction
• Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment (Right Heart Cath) – To guide therapy in patients in whom the adequacy or excess of
intracardiac filling pressures cannot be determined from clinical assessment.
– Assessment of cardiac output – Right heart pressures – To differentiate pulmonary hypertension from LV failure vs
Pulmonary arterial hypertension • PA pressures • PCWP
100
TREATMENT STRATEGIES
101
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 51
Stages, Phenotypes and Treatment of HF
STAGE AAt high risk for HF but
without structural heart
disease or symptoms of HF
STAGE BStructural heart disease
but without signs or
symptoms of HF
THERAPY
Goals
· Control symptoms
· Improve HRQOL
· Prevent hospitalization
· Prevent mortality
Strategies
· Identification of comorbidities
Treatment
· Diuresis to relieve symptoms
of congestion
· Follow guideline driven
indications for comorbidities,
e.g., HTN, AF, CAD, DM
· Revascularization or valvular
surgery as appropriate
STAGE CStructural heart disease
with prior or current
symptoms of HF
THERAPYGoals· Control symptoms· Patient education· Prevent hospitalization· Prevent mortality
Drugs for routine use· Diuretics for fluid retention· ACEI or ARB· Beta blockers· Aldosterone antagonists
Drugs for use in selected patients· Hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate· ACEI and ARB· Digoxin
In selected patients· CRT· ICD· Revascularization or valvular
surgery as appropriate
STAGE DRefractory HF
THERAPY
Goals
· Prevent HF symptoms
· Prevent further cardiac
remodeling
Drugs
· ACEI or ARB as
appropriate
· Beta blockers as
appropriate
In selected patients
· ICD
· Revascularization or
valvular surgery as
appropriate
e.g., Patients with:
· Known structural heart disease and
· HF signs and symptoms
HFpEF HFrEF
THERAPY
Goals
· Heart healthy lifestyle
· Prevent vascular,
coronary disease
· Prevent LV structural
abnormalities
Drugs
· ACEI or ARB in
appropriate patients for
vascular disease or DM
· Statins as appropriate
THERAPYGoals· Control symptoms· Improve HRQOL· Reduce hospital
readmissions· Establish patient’s end-
of-life goals
Options· Advanced care
measures· Heart transplant· Chronic inotropes· Temporary or permanent
MCS· Experimental surgery or
drugs· Palliative care and
hospice· ICD deactivation
Refractory symptoms of HF at rest, despite GDMT
At Risk for Heart Failure Heart Failure
e.g., Patients with:
· Marked HF symptoms at
rest
· Recurrent hospitalizations
despite GDMT
e.g., Patients with:
· Previous MI
· LV remodeling including
LVH and low EF
· Asymptomatic valvular
disease
e.g., Patients with:
· HTN
· Atherosclerotic disease
· DM
· Obesity
· Metabolic syndrome
or
Patients
· Using cardiotoxins
· With family history of
cardiomyopathy
Development of
symptoms of HFStructural heart
disease
102
• Heart healthy lifestyle
• Prevent vascular, coronary disease
• Prevent LV structural abnormalities
• HTN screening / treatment
• ACE I or ARB in appropriate patients with vascular disease or DM
• Statins per recommendations for primary prevention
• Risk factor modification – Diet
– Exercise
– Tobacco cessation
103
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 52
• Structural heart disease but without signs or symptoms of HF
• Medications to prevent ventricular remodeling – Beta blockers
– ACE inhibitors / ARBs
– Aldosterone antagonist
• ICD
• Revascularization
• Valvular surgery
104
• Control symptoms
• Patient education
• Prevent hospitalization
• Prevent mortality
• Diuretics for fluid retention
• Beta blockers
• ACE I or ARB
• Entresto (Neprilysin inhibitor (sacubitril) with ARB (valsartan)
• Aldosterone blockers
• Hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate
• Digoxin
• Corlanor
• CRT
• ICD
• Revascularization or valvular surgery as appropriate
• Palliative care partnering with guideline directed medical therapy
105
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 53
Number of Therapies (vs 0 or 1 therapy)
2 therapies
3 therapies
4 therapies
5, 6, or 7 therapies
Odds Ratio (95% confidence interval)
0.63 (0.47-0.85) (p=0.0026)
0.38 (0.29-0.51) (p<0.0001)
0.30 (0.23-0.41) (p<0.0001)
0.31 (0.23-0.42) (p<0.0001)
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Fonarow GC, … Yancy, C. J Am Heart Assoc 2012;1:16-26. 106
• Control symptoms
• Improve quality of life
• Prevent hospitalization
• Prevent mortality
• Diuresis to relieve symptoms of congestion
• Identify comorbidities
• Follow guideline driven indication for comorbidities
– HTN, AF, CAD, DM, sleep apnea, anemia
• Revascularization or valvular surgery as appropriate
107
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 54
• Control symptoms
• Improve quality of life
• Prevent hospitalization
• Prevent mortality
• Advance care measures
• Heart Transplant
• Chronic inotropes
• Temporary or permanent mechanical circulatory support
• Experimental surgery or drugs
• Palliative care and hospice
• ICD deactivation
108
STAGE AAt high risk for HF but
without structural heart
disease or symptoms of HF
STAGE BStructural heart disease
but without signs or
symptoms of HF
THERAPY
Goals
· Control symptoms
· Improve HRQOL
· Prevent hospitalization
· Prevent mortality
Strategies
· Identification of comorbidities
Treatment
· Diuresis to relieve symptoms
of congestion
· Follow guideline driven
indications for comorbidities,
e.g., HTN, AF, CAD, DM
· Revascularization or valvular
surgery as appropriate
STAGE CStructural heart disease
with prior or current
symptoms of HF
THERAPYGoals· Control symptoms· Patient education· Prevent hospitalization· Prevent mortality
Drugs for routine use· Diuretics for fluid retention· ACEI or ARB· Beta blockers· Aldosterone antagonists
Drugs for use in selected patients· Hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate· ACEI and ARB· Digoxin
In selected patients· CRT· ICD· Revascularization or valvular
surgery as appropriate
STAGE DRefractory HF
THERAPY
Goals
· Prevent HF symptoms
· Prevent further cardiac
remodeling
Drugs
· ACEI or ARB as
appropriate
· Beta blockers as
appropriate
In selected patients
· ICD
· Revascularization or
valvular surgery as
appropriate
e.g., Patients with:
· Known structural heart disease and
· HF signs and symptoms
HFpEF HFrEF
THERAPY
Goals
· Heart healthy lifestyle
· Prevent vascular,
coronary disease
· Prevent LV structural
abnormalities
Drugs
· ACEI or ARB in
appropriate patients for
vascular disease or DM
· Statins as appropriate
THERAPYGoals· Control symptoms· Improve HRQOL· Reduce hospital
readmissions· Establish patient’s end-
of-life goals
Options· Advanced care
measures· Heart transplant· Chronic inotropes· Temporary or permanent
MCS· Experimental surgery or
drugs· Palliative care and
hospice· ICD deactivation
Refractory symptoms of HF at rest, despite GDMT
At Risk for Heart Failure Heart Failure
e.g., Patients with:
· Marked HF symptoms at
rest
· Recurrent hospitalizations
despite GDMT
e.g., Patients with:
· Previous MI
· LV remodeling including
LVH and low EF
· Asymptomatic valvular
disease
e.g., Patients with:
· HTN
· Atherosclerotic disease
· DM
· Obesity
· Metabolic syndrome
or
Patients
· Using cardiotoxins
· With family history of
cardiomyopathy
Development of
symptoms of HFStructural heart
disease
109
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 55
• No evidence based medical therapy • ARBs, aldosterone antagonists, and sildenafil have all
been tested • ARBs and aldosterone antagonists may reduce
hospitalizations but not mortality • TOPCAT Study • Focus on co-morbid conditions:
– Hypertension – Diabetes – Sleep apnea – Atrial Fibrillation - arrhythmias – Renal dysfunction
110
• Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function HF with Aldosterone Antagonist – published 2014
• Randomized 3,445 patients to spironolactone or placebo – 1678 from Russia/Georgia – 1767 from US,Canada, Brazil, Argentina (Americas)
• Primary composite outcome: Time to CV death, aborted cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for management of HF
• No statistically significant benefit to spironolactone Pitt B, et al. TOPCAT Investigators. Spironolactone for heart failure with preserved
ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1383–1392 111
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 56
• 4 fold difference identified in the composite event rate between groups enrolled in Russia/Georgia compared with those enrolled in the Americas
• All clinical event rates were markedly lower in Russia/Georgia, and there was no detectable impact of spironolactone on any outcomes.
• In contrast, in the Americas, the rates of the primary outcome, cardiovascular death, and hospitalization for heart failure were significantly reduced by spironolactone.
Pfeffer, M. A.,et al. (2015). Regional variation in patients and outcomes in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trial. Circulation, 131(1), 34-42.
112
ACC/AHA/HFSA Guideline Update Recommendations Adldosterone Antagonist in HFpEF
COR LOE Recommendations
IIb B-R In appropriately selected patients with HFpEF (with EF ≥45%, elevated BNP levels or HF admission within 1 year, estimated glomerular filtration rate >30 mL/min, creatinine <2.5 mg/dL, potassium <5.0 mEq/L), aldosterone receptor antagonists might be considered to decrease hospitalizations (83, 166, 167).
113
COR= Class of Recommendation (strength); yellow, is reasonable/useful (Moderate) LOE = Level of Evidence (Quality); B = moderated quality; 1 or more randomized trials; GDEM: Guideline-directed evaluation and management
Yancy C, Jessup M, et al. Circulation. 2017).
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 57
STAGE AAt high risk for HF but
without structural heart
disease or symptoms of HF
STAGE BStructural heart disease
but without signs or
symptoms of HF
THERAPY
Goals
· Control symptoms
· Improve HRQOL
· Prevent hospitalization
· Prevent mortality
Strategies
· Identification of comorbidities
Treatment
· Diuresis to relieve symptoms
of congestion
· Follow guideline driven
indications for comorbidities,
e.g., HTN, AF, CAD, DM
· Revascularization or valvular
surgery as appropriate
STAGE CStructural heart disease
with prior or current
symptoms of HF
THERAPYGoals· Control symptoms· Patient education· Prevent hospitalization· Prevent mortality
Drugs for routine use· Diuretics for fluid retention· ACEI or ARB· Beta blockers· Aldosterone antagonists
Drugs for use in selected patients· Hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate· ACEI and ARB· Digoxin
In selected patients· CRT· ICD· Revascularization or valvular
surgery as appropriate
STAGE DRefractory HF
THERAPY
Goals
· Prevent HF symptoms
· Prevent further cardiac
remodeling
Drugs
· ACEI or ARB as
appropriate
· Beta blockers as
appropriate
In selected patients
· ICD
· Revascularization or
valvular surgery as
appropriate
e.g., Patients with:
· Known structural heart disease and
· HF signs and symptoms
HFpEF HFrEF
THERAPY
Goals
· Heart healthy lifestyle
· Prevent vascular,
coronary disease
· Prevent LV structural
abnormalities
Drugs
· ACEI or ARB in
appropriate patients for
vascular disease or DM
· Statins as appropriate
THERAPYGoals· Control symptoms· Improve HRQOL· Reduce hospital
readmissions· Establish patient’s end-
of-life goals
Options· Advanced care
measures· Heart transplant· Chronic inotropes· Temporary or permanent
MCS· Experimental surgery or
drugs· Palliative care and
hospice· ICD deactivation
Refractory symptoms of HF at rest, despite GDMT
At Risk for Heart Failure Heart Failure
e.g., Patients with:
· Marked HF symptoms at
rest
· Recurrent hospitalizations
despite GDMT
e.g., Patients with:
· Previous MI
· LV remodeling including
LVH and low EF
· Asymptomatic valvular
disease
e.g., Patients with:
· HTN
· Atherosclerotic disease
· DM
· Obesity
· Metabolic syndrome
or
Patients
· Using cardiotoxins
· With family history of
cardiomyopathy
Development of
symptoms of HFStructural heart
disease
114
• Point 1: Why do we use them when they decrease contractility? – Inhibits adverse effects of SNS activation
• Decrease myocardial oxygen consumption – Decreases HR – Decreases contractility (however, benefit outweighs)
– Inhibits ventricular remodeling and apoptosis – Slows disease progression – Can improve LVEF – Decreases mortality/hospitalization – Reduce symptoms, improve clinical status, and
enhance the patient’s overall sense of well-being
115
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 58
• Cannot assume class effect • Bisoprolol – β1
– CIBIS III randomized trial – 2005 (enalapril)
• Metoprolol succinate - β1
– MERIT-HF randomized trial – 1999 (placebo)
• Carvedilol - β1, β2, α1
– CAPRICORN randomized trial – 2001 (placebo)
– COMET randomized trial – 2003 (metoprolol tartrate)
116
• Even better in combination with ACE Inhibitor
– Started after initiation of ACE-I but before getting to target dose of ACE-I
• Must be used with diuretic if any recent or current fluid retention
• Start very low doses with gradual up-titration
• Titration to target dose essential
When to initiate? • Do not initiate in an acutely
decompensated patient – Remember you are giving a
negative inotrope
• Can be initiated in hospital for HF admission if inotropic therapy not required
• If decompensation occurs on a beta blocker it is generally not stopped unless inotrope is needed. Dose may need to be decreased.
117
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 59
• Bradycardia / heart blocks
– Generally asymptomatic
– Decrease or stop: If accompanied with dizziness, light headedness, 2nd or 3rd degree heart block
• Hypotension
– Consider administration opposite of ACE-I or decrease in diuretic dose
• Erectile Dysfunction
– May be less prevalent with carvedilol
118
• Stage A
• Stage B
– All patients with a recent or remote history of MI or ACS and reduced EF to reduce mortality
• Stage C
– For all patients with current or prior symptoms of HFrEF, unless contraindicated, to reduce morbidity and mortality.
119
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 60
Renin-Angiotensin Aldosterone System (RAAS)
↓ Renal Blood Flow / Perfusion
Renin Release
Angiotensinogen Angiotensin I
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme
Angiotensin II
Vasoconstriction Aldosterone Release
Na+ and H2O Retention
↑ BP → ↑ Renal Perfusion
Beta Blockers
ACE Inhibitors Angiotensin
Receptor Blockers
Aldosterone Antagonists
120
A Closer Look at ACE Inhibitors and
Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers
• Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (“pril” medications)
– Captopril, Enalapril, Lisinopril, Quinapril, Ramipril, Benazepril, Fosinopril
• Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (“sartan”
medications)
– Losartan, Irbesartan, Candesartan,Telmisartan,Valsartan, Eprosartan
121
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 61
A Closer Look at ACE-Is / ARBs
• Overall cardioprotective, vasculoprotective effect, and renal protective – Prevents ventricular remodeling
– Reduce mortality in patients with systolic heart failure
– Reduction of left ventricular mass in LV hypertrophy
– Slows progression of both renal disease in diabetes and hypertensive nephrosclerosis
122
• Increases bradykinin release and can produce cough – Release of bradykinin causes constriction of non-vascular
smooth muscle in bronchus – Cough is side effect in 10-20% of patients
• Need to assure cough is not sign of worsening heart failure • Patient should be changed to an angiotensin receptor
blocker (ARB) if unable to tolerate cough
123
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 62
• Secondary to excessive accumulation of bradykinin
• Occurs in 0.7% of treated patients • Likely genetic – non histamine angioedema • Usually soon after administration but could
occur after years of use • African Americans have a 4-5x greater risk • Women have a 2x higher risk than men • Class effect reaction:
– Absolute contraindication to further ACE I use
Treatment: Stop ACE I Antihistamines / corticosteroids not effective Epinephrine only if there is airway compromise FFP 2-4 units – suppresses bradykinin inhibits
edema progression Ecallantide- suppresses bradykinin generation Icatibant - bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist
124
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers End in “SARTAN”
• ACE Inhibitors remain the first choice for inhibition of RAAS
• ARB’s are a reasonable alternative to ACE Inhibitor if intolerant to ACE Inhibitor due to cough or angioedema
• Directly blocks angiotensin II
• ARB is a component of Entresto
• Combination of ACE I and ARB – not recommended
125 2017
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 63
• No absolute contraindication to ARB in patient with angioedema from ACE I • ACC/AHA/HFSA Guideline Update - ARB to be used in place of ACE I when there
has been cough or angioedema with ACE I (Yancy et al. Circulation. 2016;134)
• Risk of angioedema with ARB is low – Rate of angioedema in ARB population the same as placebo group1
– Rate of angioedema highest in ACE I group when comparing patients on ARB, betablocker and ACE I
• Equal rate of angioedema between beta blocker and ARB groups2
• In patients with history of angioedema with ACE I – 4-10% of patients who developed angioedema with ACE I have developed
angioedema with ARB3,4
– Sample sizes are small
126
1. Makani H et al. Am J Cardiol 2012 2. Toh S et al. Arch Intern Med 2012 3. Haymore et al. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2009 4. Beavers, C. J. et al . Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 2012
ACE Inhibitors / ARBs and Renal Function: Sorting Out the Confusion
• Renal protective in chronic kidney disease • However, can cause acute kidney injury (AKI) in patient’s at risk
(i.e. low stroke volume) due to preventing the compensatory mechanism of efferent vasoconstriction – When there is decreased blood flow into the glomerulus via the afferent arterioles,
the efferent arterioles constrict to raise glomerular filtration pressure on the back end
– ACE-I prevent efferent vasoconstriction
• Creatinine can be allowed to be 35% above baseline without stopping the drug. – As forward flow to the glomerulus improves – there is less
need for efferent vasoconstriction to compensate and glomerular filtration will stabilize
• Will cause acute renal failure in patients with bilateral renal artery stenosis – Dilation of efferent glomerular arterioles with no ability to dilate afferent arterioles
which results in decreased glomerular filtration – In bilateral renal artery stenosis there is fixed flow into the glomerulus – an
improvement in stroke volume will not improve flow into the glomerulus •
127
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 64
Bowman’s Capsule (Glomerulus)
128
• Assess renal function and potassium within 1 to 2 weeks of initiation if outpatient
• High risk features for AKI
– Hypotension
– Azotemia
– Diabetes
– Hyponatremia
• High risk features for hyperkalemia
– Potassium supplementation in combination with aldosterone antagonist
Contraindications (HF Guidelines) Bilateral renal artery stenosis Creatinine > 3 mg /dL in CKD AKI (until resolved) Potassium > 5.0 mEq/L Systolic BP < 80 mmHg
May consider holding short term in patients at high risk for AKI.
129
ESRD: ACE Inhibition ok . SBP most often limiting factor. Need reasonable SBP for
dialysis.
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 65
• Stage A – May be beneficial in treatment of hypertension
– Renal and vascular protective in DM
• Stage B – All patients with a recent or remote history of MI or ACS
and reduced EF – prevent HF
– All patients with HFrEF
– ARBs are appropriate if intolerant of ACE I
• Stage C – All patients with HFrEF and current or prior symptoms,
unless contraindicated, to reduce morbidity and mortality
130
• New class of medication: ARNI – Angiotensin Receptor Blocker with Neprilysin Inhibitor
• Combo drug: sacubitril (Neprilysin Inhibitor) with valsartan (ARB)
• PARADIGM-HF Trial • Multinational, randomized, double-blind trial • Comparing ENTRESTO with enalapril • 8,442 adult patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure (NYHA class
II–IV) and systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%). • Results:
• 20% reduction in the rate of death or hospitalization for heart failure
• 16% reduction in the rate of all-cause death compared to enalapril at 3.5 years of follow-up.
131
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 66
Endogenous Vasoactive Peptides
• Naturetic peptides • Adrenomedullin • Bradykinin • Substance P • Calcitonin gene-related
peptide
↓ Neurohormonal activation ↓ Vascular tone ↓ Cardiac fibrosis, hypertrophy ↓ Sodium retention
N
E
P
R
I
L
Y
S
I
N
Neprilysin Inhibitor
132
133
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 67
134
Sacubitril / Valsartan (Paradigm HF listed doses) 24 mg/26 mg (50 mg)
49 mg/51 mg (100 mg) 97 mg/103mg (200 mg)
Valsartan in Entresto is more bioavailable in Entresto than valsartan alone.
Dosing equivalents: Valsartan In Entresto = Valsartan alone
26mg in Entresto = 40 mg alone 51 mg in Entresto = 80 mg alone
103 mg in Entresto = 160mg alone
135
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 68
• Do not administer with ACE I – Increased risk of angioedema
– Stop ACE I for 36 hours before starting Entresto
– Do not administer in patients with history of angioedema
• Monitor kidney function, blood pressure and potassium levels
• BNP levels will not be accurate with Entresto but pro-BNP levels may be used
136
• Hypotension 18%
• Hyperkalemia 12%
• Cough 9%
• Dizziness 6%
• Renal failure/AKI 5%
• Hypotension 12%
• Hyperkalemia 14%
• Cough 13%
• Dizziness 5%
• Renal failure/AKI 5%
137
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 69
COR LOE Recommendations
I ACE I: A Inhibition of the RAS with ACE I OR ARB OR ARNI in conjunction with evidence-based betablocker, and aldosterone antagonist in selected patients, is recommended for patients with chronic HFrEF to ↓ mortality and morbidity.
ARB: A
ARNI: B-R
138
COR= Class of Recommendation (strength); green is recommended (Strong) LOE = Level of Evidence (Quality); A = high quality evidence; B = moderated quality evidence; R = randomized
Yancy C, Jessup M, et al. Circulation. 2016;134: e Pub (May 20).
COR LOE Recommendations
I ACE I: A Use of ACE I is beneficial for patients with prior or current symptoms of chronic HFrEF to ↓ morbidity and mortality
ARB: A The use of ARB to ↓ morbidity and mortality is recommended in patients with prior or current symptoms of chronic HFrEF who are intolerant to ACE inhibitors because of cough or angioedema
ARNI: B-R In patients with chronic symptomatic HFrEF NYHA class II or III who tolerate an ACE I or ARB, replacement by ARNI is recommended to further ↓ morbidity and mortality
139
COR= Class of Recommendation (strength); green is recommended (Strong) LOE = Level of Evidence (Quality); A = high quality evidence; B = moderated quality evidence; R = randomized
Yancy C, Jessup M, et al. Circulation. 2016;134: e Pub (May 20).
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 70
• Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist (MRA)
• Heart Failure – ACC/AHA Class IA Recommendation LVEF < 35% with NYHA Class II-IV
Heart Failure already on ACE I and BB
• STEMI – ACC/AHA Class IB Recommendation
– LVEF < 40% already receiving an ACE inhibitor and beta blocker
– Greatest impact if initiated within 7 days
Used in STEMI and HF for reduction in mortality 140
141
RALES Trial (1999) – 1663 pts • NYHA Class III-IV • LVEF < 35% • Standard rx. vs standard rx. with
spironolactone • 30% ↓ in mortality • 35% ↓ in hospitalization
EMPHASIS-HF (2011) – 2737 pts • NYHA Class II • LVEF < 35% • Standard rx. vs standard rx. with epleranone
• 24% ↓ in all cause mortality • 42% ↓ in HF hospitalization
2017
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 71
• Promotes retention of sodium
• Promotes loss of potassium and magnesium
• Potentiates catecholamines
• Inhibits the parasympathetic nervous system
• Decreases arterial compliance
• Promotes direct remodeling
• Has prothrombotic properties
• Causes vascular inflammation and injury
142
• Non selective aldosterone blocker – Blocks aldosterone and
androgen; stimulates progesterone
• RALES Trial
• Selective aldosterone receptor antagonist
• EMPHASIS-HF
• EPHESUS (Post MI)
Major side effect:
gynecomastia (10%), sexual
dysfunction and menstrual
problems due to non
selectivity
Eliminates most
gynecomastia and sexual side
effects associated with
aldactone
143
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 72
• Potassium sparing medications
• Any potassium supplements should be stopped after initiating - consider potassium based
salt substitutes
• Counsel patients about avoiding foods high in potassium
Lab Monitoring • Potassium and renal
function checked 2-3 days after initiation and again at 7 days then at the one month mark. If stable then every 3 months.
• Adding or increasing ACE I or ARB should increase potassium and creatinine surveillance.
• Also monitor for hyponatremia.
144
• Combination of fixed dose of Hydralazine & Isosorbide Dinitrate (ISDN) to a standard medical regimen for HF, including ACEIs and beta blockers, is recommended patients self-described as African Americans, with NYHA functional class III to IV HF.
• Rationale: Less renin responsive
• Morality benefit • Compliance is difficult • Target dose: 3 times a day, for a total DAILY dose of 120 mg
ISDN (40mg TID) and 225 mg hydralazine (75mg TID) • Bidil: ISDN 20mg / hydralazine 37.5mg
– 1 up to 2 tablets TID
145
Combination may also be considered in those who are ACE I or ARB intolerant.
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 73
• African American Heart Failure Trail (2004) - A-HeFT
• 1050 self-described African American patients
• NYHA Class III or IV
• LVEF < 35% or < 45 with a dilated left ventricle
• Currently on standard therapy with BB for at least 3 months prior to enrollment
• Randomized to standard therapy + placebo (1 tablet TID) or standard therapy + 37.5mg of hydralazine and 20mg of ISDN (combined in one tablet TID)
• Dose increased to 2 tablets TID if no side effects with 1 tablet TID
• Trial ended early due to significantly higher rate of mortality in placebo group
– 43% reduction in rate of death from any cause
– 33% reduction in the rate of first hospitalization for heart failure in treatment group
– Significant improvement in quality of life score in treatment group
146
• Initiation: • Hydralazine 37.5 mg / ISDN
20mg 3 times daily
• Target dose: – Total DAILY dose of
Hydralazine 225 mg (75mg TID) and ISDN 120 mg (40mg TID)
• Bidil – combo drug: – Hydralazine 37.5mg / ISDN
20mg
– 1 up to 2 tablets TID
• Adherence difficult
• Adverse Reaction – Headache
– Dizziness
– GI complaints
147
Consider slower titration to enhance
tolerance
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 74
Stage C Recommendations
• Digoxin can be beneficial in patients with HFrEF, unless contraindicated, to decrease hospitalizations for HF (Class IIa, LOE: B)
• (
• Improved symptoms, exercise tolerance and quality of life
• NYHA Class II-III HF treated with digoxin 2-5 years had modestly reduced combined risk of death and hospitalization
• NO EFFECT ON MORTALITY
148
How Digoxin Works
• Inhibits the NA+ and K+ membrane pump
▼
• Increase in intracellular Na+ ▼
• Enhances the Na+ and Ca++ exchange
▼
• Leads to ▲in intracellular Ca++
▼
• ▲inotropic activity (weak)
• Beneficial in heart failure
• Administration of digoxin – Improves baroreceptor
function that results in ↓ activation of the sympathetic nervous system
– ↑ vagal tone – ↓ sympathetic nerve
discharge – ↓serum norepinephrine
concentrations and plasma renin activity
149
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 75
• ↑ vagal activity
• ↓ conduction velocity through the AV node
• HOWEVER: Sympathetic stimulation easily overrides the inhibitory effects of digoxin on AV node conduction
• No better than placebo in converting atrial fib to Sinus Rhythm
• The conduction velocity ↑in the atria, but ↓ in the AV node.
• Automaticity is also increased, in the atria, AV node, Purkinje fibers and ventricles.
• Beta blockers are used for rate
control in HFrEF
» Addition of digoxin to BB can be
beneficial for rate control in HF
• Calcium channel blockers have
replaced digoxin as agent for rate
control in atrial arrhythmias in non
HF patients
• Digoxin remains good option in
acute setting when blood pressure
is marginal
– Give IV slowly over 5 minutes
150
Rate Control in AF Impact on Conduction
Contraindications / Cautions
• Women • Acute MI / Ischemia • Ventricular arrhythmias, Heart Block, Sick Sinus Syndrome, WPW • Hypertrophic or restrictive cardiomyopathy • Amyloid heart disease • Electrolyte abnormalities
– Hypokalemia ↑ risk of toxicity – Hypocalcemia ↓ sensitivity to digoxin – Don’t give IV calcium if digoxin toxic
151
Digoxin may be particularly beneficial in patients with a LVEF less than 25%, symptoms with minimal exertion or at rest, and/or
cardiomegaly on chest x-ray
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 76
• Has a narrow therapeutic range
• Toxicity may occur at therapeutic levels or lower
• Lower doses routinely used - 0.125 mg daily
– Especially if > 70 years of age, impaired renal function, or low lean body mass
• No need for loading dose in HF
• Amiodorone increases serum digoxin concentration (digoxin doses must be reduced if starting amiodarone)
• Multiple other medication interaction and will cause increased digoxin levels – assess carefully
• Dialysis is not effective with digoxin toxicity because of high tissue binding of digoxin
152 Dig Level Goal in HF: 0.5-0.9ng/mL
• EKG Changes with Toxicity – Increased automaticity with impaired conduction is common
• Re-entrant tachycardias • Paroxsysmal atrial tachycardia with AV Block • Heart block
• GI Symptoms with Toxicity – N & V (most frequent 1st sign) – Anorexia
• Neurologic Symptoms with Toxicity – Headache – Confusion – Visual disturbances: halos, change in color perception
153
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 77
154
REMEMBER: Maximum tolerated dose is the
pharmacologic treatment goal!!!
155
Drug class Brand name
generic name Starting dose Target dose
ACE Inhibitor Prinivil or Zestril
lisinopril 5 mg once daily 20 mg once daily
maximum dose might be 40 mg once daily
ACE Inhibitor Monopril
fosinopril sodium 10 mg once daily
5 mg if weak kidneys 40 mg once daily
ACE Inhibitor Vasotec
enalapril maleate 2.5 mg BID 20 mg BID
maximum dose might be 40 mg BID
ACE Inhibitor Mavik
trandolapril one mg once daily 4 mg once daily
ACE Inhibitor Capoten captopril
25 mg 2 to 3 times a day 100mg TID (450 mg per day maximum)
ACE Inhibitor Lotensin
benazepril
5 mg once daily if on diuretic
10 mg once daily if not on diuretic
40 mg per day in one 40 mg dose or two 20 mg doses
ACE Inhibitor Accupril quinapril
5 mg BID 2.5 mg BID if weak
kidneys 20 mg BID
ACE Inhibitor Altace
ramipril 1.25 mg to 2.5 mg BID 10 mg BID
ACE Inhibitor Aceon
perindopril erbumine
1 mg BID if on diuretic 2 mg BID if not on
diuretic 4 mg BID (8 mg BID maximum)
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 78
156
Drug class Brand name
generic name Starting dose Target dose
ARB Cozaar
losartan
25 mg BID or 50 mg once daily
12.5 mg BID or 25 mg once daily if weak
liver function
50 mg BID
ARB Atacand
candesartan cilexetil 4 to 8 mg once daily 32 mg once daily
ARB Diovan
valsartan 80 mg once daily 160 mg once daily
80 mg once daily if weak liver function
ARB Avapro
irbesartan 150 mg 300 mg once daily
Beta-blocker Coreg
carvedilol 3.125 mg BID
25 mg BID under 188 pounds
50 mg BID over 187 pounds
Beta-blocker Toprol XL
metoprolol extended release (succinate)
12.5 mg for class 3 to 4 patients
25 mg for class 1 to 2 patients
200 mg once daily
Beta-blocker Zebeta
bisoprolol 2.5 mg once daily 10 mg once daily
Aldosterone Antagonist
Aldactone spironolactone
25 mg once daily 25 mg once daily
Aldosterone Antagonist
Inspra eplerenone
25 mg once daily 50 mg once daily
Medical Therapy for Stage C HFrEF:
Magnitude of Benefit Demonstrated in RCTs
GDMT RR Reduction
in Mortality
NNT for Mortality
Reduction
(Standardized to 36 mo)
RR Reduction
in HF
Hospitalizations
ACE inhibitor or
ARB 17% 26 31%
Beta blocker 34% 9 41%
Aldosterone
antagonist 30% 6 35%
Hydralazine/nitrate 43% 7 33%
157
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 79
Incremental Benefit with HF Therapies (Cumulative % Reduction in Odds of Death at 24 Months Associated with Sequential Treatments)
+20% to -68%
P=0.1566
-43% to -91%
P<0.0001
-70% to -96%
P<0.0001
Fonarow GC,Yancy CW. J Am Heart Assoc 2012;1:16-26. 158
Diuretics • Decrease congestive
symptoms
– No mortality benefit
• First line: Loop diuretics – Thiazide diuretic my be added
• Potassium and magnesium monitoring
• Use with moderate NA restriction
• Fluid restriction criteria
• Monitor response to therapy
– Adequate diuresis • BNP or NT-pro BNP
goal
• JVP assessment
• Orthopnea
– Over diuresis • Hypotension
• Dizziness
• Orthostatic BP
159
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 80
Renal Anatomy: Nephron and Loop Diuretics
160
• Work in ascending loop of Henle • Loss of H2O, K+, Na+, Cl-, H+ • More loss of H2O and less K+ and Na+ than
thiazides • Promotes venous vasodilatation • Rapid onset and short duration • Can be effective in presence of renal failure • High ceiling diuretic / threshold
medications
161
Proximal Convoluted Tubule Mannitol
Distal Convoluted Tubule Thiazide Metolazone
Thick Ascending Limb of Loop Bumetanide Furosemide Torsemide
Distal Renal Tubule Spironolactone
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 81
Diuretic Therapy
Outpatient
• Weight loss goal of 0.5 to 1.0 kg per day
• Patients can be educated for adjustable diuretic dosing • Weight gain
• Change in oral intake or during periods of illness
Diuretic Resistance
• Diuretic resistance – Reasons
• High sodium levels
• NSAIDs
• Severe renal impairment
• Renal hypoperfusion
– Strategies • IV instead of PO
– Continuous infusion versus intermittent dosing if BP is a concern
• Change the loop diuretic
• Addition of thiazide
• Higher dose spironalctone
162
More on Loop Diuretics
• DOSE Trial – NEJM: Felker et al., 2011
– No significant difference in symptoms or renal function between continuous drip versus intermittent dosing
– Non significant trend toward improvement in symptoms with high dose (IV at 2.5 x PO dose) versus low dose; (IV at same as PO dose) no change in renal function
163
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 82
Loop Diuretics
• Equivalents – Furosemide 40 mg – Torsemide 20 mg – Bumetanide 1 mg
• Dosing
– Adequate to relieve symptoms
– Threshold medication – In hospital: Convert home
PO dose to IV at equal or greater than home dose
Bumetanide (Bumex)
Furosemide (Lasix)
Torsemide (Demadex)
164
Differences in Loop Diuretics
Bumetanide Furosemide Torsemide Lack of randomized control data with comparison to furosemide Better pharmacokinetic profile (oral bioavailability) than furosemide but torsemide has evidence of more efficacy and more safety Oral Bioavailability 80% Max dose 10mg / day Onset 30-60min Peak 1-2 hours Duration 4 hours May repeat every 4-5 hours
BID Dosing when GFR is low Oral Bioavailability 50% Max dose 600mg/day Onset 60min Peak 1-2 hours Duration 6-8 hours May repeat every 6-8 hours
2 randomized trials comparing Torsemide and Furosemide Torsemide associated with reduction in HF and CV readmission in systolic HF with a trend towards reduction of all cause mortality. Oral Bioavailability 80-100% Max dose 200mg/day Onset 60min Peak 1-2 hours Duration 6-8 hours May repeat every 6-8 hours 165
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 83
More on Loop Diuretics
• DOSE Trial – NEJM: Felker et al., 2011
– No significant difference in symptoms or renal function between continuous drip versus intermittent dosing
– Non significant trend toward improvement in symptoms with high dose (IV at 2.5 x PO dose) versus low dose; (IV at same as PO dose) no change in renal function
166
Thiazide Diuretics
– Inhibit reabsorption of Na+ and Cl-
• In the distal convoluted tubule
• More sodium loss than loop diuretics
– Delayed onset but longer duration of action than loop diuretics
• Give 30 minutes before a loop diuretic
– LOW CEILING DIURETICS
– Less potent diuretic than loop diuretics
– Diminished effectiveness in presence of renal failure 167
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 84
Thiazide Diuretics
Bendrofluazide (Naturetin) SIDE EFFECTS:
Blood Chemistry changes::
Hyponatremia (↓ Na+)
Hypokalemia (↓ K+)
Hypomagnesemia (↓ Mg+)
Hyperglycemia (↑ blood sugar)
Hyperuricemia (↑ uric acid)
Hypercalcemia (↑ Ca++)
Decreased glomerular filtration in
kidneys (↑ BUN, creatinine)
↑ cholesterol
↑ triglycerides
↓ HDL cholesterol
OTHER SIDE EFFECTS:
Impaired glucose tolerance
Gout
Impotence
Ventricular arrhythmias (↓ K+)
Nausea, dizziness, headache
Benthiazide (Aquatag, Exna)
Chlorothiazide (Diuril)
Chlorthalidone (Hygroton)
Cyclothiazide (Anhydron)
Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) (HydroDiuril, Esidrix)
Hydroflumethazide (Saluron, Diucardin)
Indapamide (Lozol)
Metolazone (Zaroxolyn)
Polythiazide (Renese)
Trichlormethiazide (Metahydrin, Naqua)
168
Diuretics and Renal Function
• Role of venous congestion in worsening renal function
• Role of volume depletion / hypotension and worsening renal function
169
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 85
Cardiorenal Syndrome
• Moderate to severe renal dysfunction with fluid overload
– Continue to treat with diuretics
• In severe fluid overload renal dysfunction my improve with continued treatment
• May need to hold ACE I secondary to AKI
• Venous congestion plays a role in worsening renal function (not just hypoperfusion)
170
IMPORTANCE OF VENOUS CONGESTION FOR WORSENING OF RENAL FUNCTION IN
ADVANCED DECOMPENSATED HEART FAILURE. MULLENS ET AL. (2009). JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 53(7), 589-596.
We observed in our patient population with low-output decompensated HF that besides the presence of intrinsic renal insufficiency, venous congestion was the strongest hemodynamic determinant for the development of WRF (worsening renal failure).
In contrast, impaired Cardiac Index on admission and improvement in Cardiac Index after intensive medical therapy had a limited contribution to WRF.
171
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 86
Increased CVP is associated with impaired renal function and independently related to all-cause mortality in a broad spectrum of patients with cardiovascular disease.
172
INCREASED CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE IS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPAIRED RENAL FUNCTION AND
MORTALITY IN A BROAD SPECTRUM OF PATIENTS WITH CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE.
Damman, K. et al, (2009). Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 53(7), 582-588.
NEW KIDS ON THE BLOCK
173
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 87
• Sinus node inhibition • Inhibition of the Hyperpolarization –activated
cyclic nucleotide-gated channels (If channel or f-channel or “Funny” channel)
• If current is an inward Na+/K+ current that activates pacemaker cells of the SA Node
• Ivabradine binds the “Funny” channel in a current dependent fashion
• Slows diastolic depolarization → slows the firing of the SA Node → slows heart rate
174
Ivabradine (Corlanor)
Impact of HR on Heart Failure
• In patients with coronary artery disease and left-ventricular dysfunction, a heart rate of 70 beats per minute (bpm) or higher was associated with a 34% increased risk of cardiovascular death and a 53% increase in admission to hospital for heart failure compared with heart rate lower than 70 bpm1
• Heart rate is also directly related to risk of death, cardiovascular death, or admission to hospital in patients with heart failure2
• Heart-rate reduction is associated with improved outcomes3
175
1. Fox K et al. on behalf of the BEAUTIFUL investigators. Heart rate as a prognostic risk factor in patients with coronary artery disease and leftventricular systolic dysfunction (BEAUTIFUL): a subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2008; 372: 817–21
2. Pocock SJ, et al. Predictors of mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 65–75.
3. Flannery G et al. Analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effect of magnitude of heart rate reduction on clinical outcomes in patients with systolic chronic heart failure re
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 88
176
177
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 89
Ivabradine (Corlanor)
• SHIFT Trial (2010) • Double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-
group study • Symptomatic HF, LVEF < 35%, in NSR with HR
> 70 bmp, admitted for HF in previous year, on stable HF treatment
• 6558 patients randomized to ivabradine 7.5mg BID or matching placebo
• Primary endpoint: composite of CV death or hospital admission for worsening HF
178
Ivabradine (Corlanor)
• Median follow up 22.9 months • Mean HR lowered to • Statistically significant outcomes:
– Composite endpoint (CV death or Hospitalization for HF): 18% reduction with Ivabradine
– Hospitalization for worsening HF: 26% reduction with Ivabradine – Deaths due to HF: 26% reduction in Ivabradine group (CV deaths
and all cause deaths not statistically significant) – The higher the baseline heart rate the better the outcome – Quality of Life scores better with ivabradine
• Side Effect: Phosphenes (visual disturbances) reported in 3% of ivabradine group (1% in placebo – p<0.0001)
179
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 90
ACC/AHA/HFSA Guideline Update Recommendations for Ivabradine (Stage C HFrEF)
COR LOE Recommendations
IIa B-R Ivabradine can be beneficial to reduce HF hospitalization for patients with symptomatic (NYHA class II-III), stable chronic HFrEF (LVEF < 35%) who are receiving GDEM, including beta blocker at maximum tolerated dose, and who are in NSR with a heart rate of > 70 bmp at rest.
180
COR= Class of Recommendation (strength); yellow, is reasonable/useful (Moderate) LOE = Level of Evidence (Quality); B = moderated quality; 1 or more randomized trials; GDEM: Guideline-directed evaluation and management
Yancy C, Jessup M, et al. Circulation. 2016;134: e Pub (May 20).
181
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 91
• Nutritional supplement as treatment for HF – Coenzyme Q10
– Carnitine
– Taurine
– Antioxidants
• Hormone therapies outside correcting deficiencies – Growth hormone
– Thyroid hormone
• Antiarrhythmics
• Calcium channel blockers – Myocardial depressant
– Except amlodipine – neither harm nor benefit in HF –OK for HTN / ischemia control
• NSAIDs – Cause sodium and water
retention
• Thiazolidinediones – Associated with increase
incidence of HF 182
Cardiac Resynchronization
Therapy
183
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 92
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT)
• Treatment modality for heart failure not just pacing – Used in conjunction with optimal medical therapy
• Goals: – Improves contractile function – Diminishes secondary mitral regurgitation – Can reverse ventricular remodeling – Can improve LVEF – Improvement in blood pressure may allow for increased up
titration of medications – furthering increasing LV function – Improve quality of life – Decrease mortality and morbidity
184
Normal Ventricular Depolarization
185
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 93
Ventricular Depolarization with LBBB
186
Implantation of CRT
187
Where are the leads?
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 94
Indications for CRT Therapy Patient with cardiomyopathy on GDMT for >3 mo or on GDMT and >40 d after MI, or
with implantation of pacing or defibrillation device for special indications
LVEF <35%
Evaluate general health status
Comorbidities and/or frailty
limit survival with good
functional capacity to <1 y
Continue GDMT without
implanted device
Acceptable noncardiac health
Evaluate NYHA clinical status
NYHA class I
· LVEF ≤30%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Ischemic
cardiomyopathy
· QRS ≤150 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
NYHA class II
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS 120-149 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· QRS ≤150 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
Colors correspond to the class of recommendations in the ACCF/AHA Table 1.
Benefit for NYHA class I and II patients has only been shown in CRT-D trials, and while patients may not experience immediate symptomatic benefit, late remodeling may be avoided along
with long-term HF consequences. There are no trials that support CRT-pacing (without ICD) in NYHA class I and II patients. Thus, it is anticipated these patients would receive CRT-D
unless clinical reasons or personal wishes make CRT-pacing more appropriate. In patients who are NYHA class III and ambulatory class IV, CRT-D may be chosen but clinical reasons and
personal wishes may make CRT-pacing appropriate to improve symptoms and quality of life when an ICD is not expected to produce meaningful benefit in survival.
NYHA class III &
Ambulatory class IV
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS 120-149 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS 120-149 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· LVEF≤35%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· Anticipated to require
frequent ventricular
pacing (>40%)
· Atrial fibrillation, if
ventricular pacing is
required and rate
control will result in
near 100%
ventricular pacing
with CRT
Special CRT
Indications
188
Green: Class I (Benefit >> Risk) Gold: Class IIa (Benefit > Risk) Orange: Class IIb (Benefit > Risk Red: Class III (No benefit or harm)
Indications for CRT
189
LVEF < 35% GDMT for > 3 months OR GDMT > 40 days if myocardial infarction
Expected survival > 1 year
Patient with cardiomyopathy on GDMT for >3 mo or on GDMT and >40 d after MI, or
with implantation of pacing or defibrillation device for special indications
LVEF <35%
Evaluate general health status
Comorbidities and/or frailty
limit survival with good
functional capacity to <1 y
Continue GDMT without
implanted device
Acceptable noncardiac health
Evaluate NYHA clinical status
NYHA class I
· LVEF ≤30%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Ischemic
cardiomyopathy
· QRS ≤150 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
NYHA class II
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS 120-149 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· QRS ≤150 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
Colors correspond to the class of recommendations in the ACCF/AHA Table 1.
Benefit for NYHA class I and II patients has only been shown in CRT-D trials, and while patients may not experience immediate symptomatic benefit, late remodeling may be avoided along
with long-term HF consequences. There are no trials that support CRT-pacing (without ICD) in NYHA class I and II patients. Thus, it is anticipated these patients would receive CRT-D
unless clinical reasons or personal wishes make CRT-pacing more appropriate. In patients who are NYHA class III and ambulatory class IV, CRT-D may be chosen but clinical reasons and
personal wishes may make CRT-pacing appropriate to improve symptoms and quality of life when an ICD is not expected to produce meaningful benefit in survival.
NYHA class III &
Ambulatory class IV
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS 120-149 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS 120-149 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· LVEF≤35%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· Anticipated to require
frequent ventricular
pacing (>40%)
· Atrial fibrillation, if
ventricular pacing is
required and rate
control will result in
near 100%
ventricular pacing
with CRT
Special CRT
Indications
Patient with cardiomyopathy on GDMT for >3 mo or on GDMT and >40 d after MI, or
with implantation of pacing or defibrillation device for special indications
LVEF <35%
Evaluate general health status
Comorbidities and/or frailty
limit survival with good
functional capacity to <1 y
Continue GDMT without
implanted device
Acceptable noncardiac health
Evaluate NYHA clinical status
NYHA class I
· LVEF ≤30%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Ischemic
cardiomyopathy
· QRS ≤150 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
NYHA class II
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS 120-149 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· QRS ≤150 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
Colors correspond to the class of recommendations in the ACCF/AHA Table 1.
Benefit for NYHA class I and II patients has only been shown in CRT-D trials, and while patients may not experience immediate symptomatic benefit, late remodeling may be avoided along
with long-term HF consequences. There are no trials that support CRT-pacing (without ICD) in NYHA class I and II patients. Thus, it is anticipated these patients would receive CRT-D
unless clinical reasons or personal wishes make CRT-pacing more appropriate. In patients who are NYHA class III and ambulatory class IV, CRT-D may be chosen but clinical reasons and
personal wishes may make CRT-pacing appropriate to improve symptoms and quality of life when an ICD is not expected to produce meaningful benefit in survival.
NYHA class III &
Ambulatory class IV
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS 120-149 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS 120-149 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· LVEF≤35%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· Anticipated to require
frequent ventricular
pacing (>40%)
· Atrial fibrillation, if
ventricular pacing is
required and rate
control will result in
near 100%
ventricular pacing
with CRT
Special CRT
Indications
Patient with cardiomyopathy on GDMT for >3 mo or on GDMT and >40 d after MI, or
with implantation of pacing or defibrillation device for special indications
LVEF <35%
Evaluate general health status
Comorbidities and/or frailty
limit survival with good
functional capacity to <1 y
Continue GDMT without
implanted device
Acceptable noncardiac health
Evaluate NYHA clinical status
NYHA class I
· LVEF ≤30%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Ischemic
cardiomyopathy
· QRS ≤150 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
NYHA class II
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS 120-149 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· QRS ≤150 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
Colors correspond to the class of recommendations in the ACCF/AHA Table 1.
Benefit for NYHA class I and II patients has only been shown in CRT-D trials, and while patients may not experience immediate symptomatic benefit, late remodeling may be avoided along
with long-term HF consequences. There are no trials that support CRT-pacing (without ICD) in NYHA class I and II patients. Thus, it is anticipated these patients would receive CRT-D
unless clinical reasons or personal wishes make CRT-pacing more appropriate. In patients who are NYHA class III and ambulatory class IV, CRT-D may be chosen but clinical reasons and
personal wishes may make CRT-pacing appropriate to improve symptoms and quality of life when an ICD is not expected to produce meaningful benefit in survival.
NYHA class III &
Ambulatory class IV
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS 120-149 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS 120-149 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· LVEF≤35%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· Anticipated to require
frequent ventricular
pacing (>40%)
· Atrial fibrillation, if
ventricular pacing is
required and rate
control will result in
near 100%
ventricular pacing
with CRT
Special CRT
Indications
Patient with cardiomyopathy on GDMT for >3 mo or on GDMT and >40 d after MI, or
with implantation of pacing or defibrillation device for special indications
LVEF <35%
Evaluate general health status
Comorbidities and/or frailty
limit survival with good
functional capacity to <1 y
Continue GDMT without
implanted device
Acceptable noncardiac health
Evaluate NYHA clinical status
NYHA class I
· LVEF ≤30%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Ischemic
cardiomyopathy
· QRS ≤150 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
NYHA class II
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS 120-149 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· QRS ≤150 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
Colors correspond to the class of recommendations in the ACCF/AHA Table 1.
Benefit for NYHA class I and II patients has only been shown in CRT-D trials, and while patients may not experience immediate symptomatic benefit, late remodeling may be avoided along
with long-term HF consequences. There are no trials that support CRT-pacing (without ICD) in NYHA class I and II patients. Thus, it is anticipated these patients would receive CRT-D
unless clinical reasons or personal wishes make CRT-pacing more appropriate. In patients who are NYHA class III and ambulatory class IV, CRT-D may be chosen but clinical reasons and
personal wishes may make CRT-pacing appropriate to improve symptoms and quality of life when an ICD is not expected to produce meaningful benefit in survival.
NYHA class III &
Ambulatory class IV
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS 120-149 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS 120-149 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· LVEF ≤35%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· LVEF≤35%
· QRS ≥150 ms
· Non-LBBB pattern
· Sinus rhythm
· Anticipated to require
frequent ventricular
pacing (>40%)
· Atrial fibrillation, if
ventricular pacing is
required and rate
control will result in
near 100%
ventricular pacing
with CRT
Special CRT
Indications
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 95
CRT
• Causes of Loss of Bi V pacing: – Long AV Delays – Prolonged PVARP – ST with 1 degree AV Block – Lead dislodgement – Atrial fibrillation – Ventricular Ectopy
190
Internal Monitoring with CRT
• Heart rate variability
• Patient activity
• Night heart rate
• Impedance
Routine re-evaluation of pacing burden is important in the treatment of HF. If HF worsens
assess CRT function.
Diuretic dose may need to be decreased after initiation of CRT.
191
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 96
• RV pacing results in mechanical dysynchrony (mechanical LBBB)
• Similar changes occur as do with LBBB normally: – LV remodeling – Systolic dysfunction – Decreased perfusion – Wall motion abnormalities – Mitral valve regurgitation – Increased risk of AF and HF
192
Importance of Minimizing RV Pacing with DUAL Chamber Pacemakers
Importance of Minimizing RV Pacing with DUAL Chamber Pacemakers
• Increased hospitalizations for HF (DAVID Trial)
• Increased mortality (DAVID Trial)
• No improvement in mortality, HF hospitalizations or stroke free survival when compared to VVI (MOST Trial, CTOPP Trial)
• AAI pacing demonstrates improved outcomes
• Reducing RV pacing to less than 10% in patients with dual chamber pacemakers reduced the relative risk of developing persistent atrial fibrillation by 40% compared to conventional dual chamber pacing (SAVE PACe Trial)
193
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 97
• Pacer Lead Placement Options – His Bundle
– RV outflow tract
– RV septal sites
– Dual pacers in RV
– LV pacing
– Biventricular pacing
• Programming Options
– DDIR mode
– AAIR mode with mode switching
– VVI mode with low rate for those being paced as defibrillation back up only
– Long AV delays
194
Importance of Minimizing RV Pacing with DUAL Chamber Pacemakers
Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
Functional status / 1 year Turning off
195
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 98
196
ICD Device
• Pulse Generator – Single chamber, dual chamber, or biventricular pacing – Back up pacing – Antitachycardia pacing – Implanted subcutaneously – same as pacemaker
• Defibrillator lead
– Detects arrhythmias – Delivers therapy – Defibrillator lead capable of pacing and defibrillating – Placed in right ventricle
197
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 99
ICD Functions
• ATP-Anti tachycardia Pacing – Tiered Antiarrhythmic Therapies
198
ICD Functions
– Cardioversion Shock • Delivers shocks from 0.1 to 30 joules synchronized on the R
wave
199
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 100
200
ICD Functions
– Defibrillating Shock • Delivers high energy (20-34 joules) unsynchronized
shock for VF
Differentiate CRT-D from CRT-P
201
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 101
Data from ICD – Optivol Medtronic
202
Internal Monitoring with Devices
• Heart rate variability / Night heart rate
• Patient activity
• Impedance / Volume assessment
• Atria fib burden
• Ventricular arrhythmias
Routine re-evaluation of pacing burden is important in the treatment of HF.
203
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 102
CardioMEMs CHAMPOIN Trial (2011)
• Clinical Trial Indications: Patients 18 years older with NYHA Class III heart failure for at least 3 months, irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction and a hospitalization for heart failure within the past 3 months. Current manufacturer recommendations (post FDA approval): NYHA Class III HF hospitalized in the past year for heart failure.
• Randomized to CardioMEMS or standard treatment for heart failure. During the entire follow-up (mean 15 months [SD 7]), the treatment group had a 37% reduction in heart-failure-related hospitalization compared with the control group (158 vs 254, HR 0·63, 95% CI 0·52–0·77; p<0.0001).
• Conclusion: The addition of information regarding pulmonary artery pressure to clinical signs and symptoms improves heart failure management and reduces heart failure readmissions. Quality of life data is also available.
• Current Practice: Current practice is representative of the control group in this trial which includes monitoring signs and symptoms(reporting of symptoms and daily weights) as in the control group in the CHAMPION Trial.
• Safety: 98.6% free of device complications.
204
205
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 103
Cardiac Rehabilitation
• Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) determined that the evidence was sufficient to expand coverage for cardiac rehabilitation services to beneficiaries with stable, chronic heart failure – Feb. 2014 – patients with left ventricular ejection fraction of 35% or less – New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II to IV symptoms
despite being on optimal heart failure therapy for at least six weeks.
– Stable patients are defined as patients who have not had recent (≤6 weeks) or planned (≤6 months) major cardiovascular hospitalizations or procedures.
• Medicare anticipates a potential reduction of 30 day readmissions by 30% with participation in Cardiac Rehab
206
Cardiac Rehab
• The largest single trial, HF-ACTION (Heart Failure: A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training)
• Showed a reduction in the adjusted risk for the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality or hospitalization (hazard ratio: 0.89, 95% confidence interval: 0.81 to 0.99; p = 0.03).
• Quality of life and mental depression also improved. • CHF-related counseling, whether provided in isolation
or in combination with CR exercise training, improves clinical outcomes and reduces CHF-related hospitalizations.
207
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 104
Cardiac Rehab After Advanced Therapy
• Transplanted heart lacks neural regulatory and feedback controls – Resting heart rate is high with a delayed increase with
exercise – Rate response to exercise can be erratic and unpredictable – Use of symptom-based monitoring such as the Borg scale
or other rating of perceived exertion is required.
• Blood pressure measurement in the LVAD patient requires a doppler ultrasound device – Goal between 70-90 mm Hg considered safe
• LVAD patient perceived exertion is very important since it is not clear if HR is reliable
208
ACUTE DECOMPENSATED HEART FAILURE
209
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 105
• Sudden or gradual onset of the signs and symptoms of heart failure requiring unplanned office visits, emergency room visits, or hospitalizations.
• Associated with pulmonary and systemic congestion due to increased left and right heart filling pressures.
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF)
210
Acute Decompensated HF represents a sentinel
prognostic event.
Readmission rate predicted to be 50% at 6 months.
1-year mortality of approximately 30% of ADHF admissions
Common Precipitating Factors of ADHF
• Non adherence with – Medications
– Dietary sodium intake
– Fluid intake
• Excessive alcohol or drug use
• ACS
• Arrhythmias
• Persistent hypertension
• Valvular heart disease
• Recent addition of negative inotrope
• Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
• Worsening renal function
• Endocrine abnormality
• Concurrent infection
• New anemia
• Pulmonary embolism
212
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 106
Hospitalization Recommended
Evidence of severe ADHF, including:
• Hypotension
• Worsening renal function
• Altered mentation
Dyspnea at rest
• Typically reflected by resting tachypnea
• Less commonly reflected by oxygen saturation <90%
Hemodynamically significant arrhythmia - including new onset of rapid atrial fibrillation
Acute coronary syndromes
213
Hospitalization Should be Considered
Worsened congestion: Even without dyspnea Signs and symptoms of pulmonary or systemic congestion • Even in the absence of weight gain Major electrolyte disturbance Associated comorbid conditions • Pneumonia • Pulmonary embolus • Diabetic ketoacidosis • Symptoms suggestive of transient ischemic accident or stroke Repeated ICD firings Previously undiagnosed HF with signs and symptoms of systemic or pulmonary congestion
214
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 107
Treatment Goals
• Improve symptoms, especially congestion and low-output symptoms
• Optimize volume status
• Identify etiology
• Identify and address precipitating factors
• Optimize chronic oral therapy
• Minimize side effects
• Identify patients who might benefit from revascularization
• Identify patients who might benefit from device therapy
• Identify risk of thromboembolism and need for anticoagulant therapy
• Educate patients concerning medications and self management of HF
• Consider and, where possible, initiate a disease management program
215
3 Clinical Presentations
Patient 1: Volume overload (Backwards Failure)
Patient 2: Profound depression of cardiac output –hypoperfusion (Forwards Failure)
Patient 3: Signs and symptoms of both fluid overload and hypoperfusion (cardiogenic shock)
216
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 108
Evaluation Guides Treatment Decisions
• Determine
– Volume Status
– Perfusion Status
– Role of / or presence of precipitating factors and/or comorbidities
– Ejection fraction
• HFpEF
• HFrEF
217
Hypoperfusion vs. Volume Overload
• Intravascular Volume Overload – Elevated jugular
venous pressure
– Hepatojugular reflex
– Orthopnea
– Dyspnea
– Crackles
– Weight gain
– Peripheral edema
• Hypoperfusion – Narrow pulse pressure
– Resting tachycardia
– Cool Skin
– Altered mentation
– Decreased urine output
– Increased BUN/Creatinine
– Cheyne Stokes Respirations
218
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 109
Backwards Failure:
Pulmonary Congestion
Forwards Failure:
Hypoperfusion
219
Warm and Dry
Normal Perfusion
No Congestion
Warm and Wet
Normal Perfusion
Congestion
Cold and Dry
Low Perfusion
No Congestion
Cold and Wet
Low Perfusion
Congestion
220
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 110
Treatment for Acute Decompensated HF
Congestion with Adequate Perfusion
• Subset II
• Reduce Preload
Hypoperfusion with No Congestion
• Subset III • Increase contractility
– Assure adequate preload
Hypoperfusion with Congestion
• Subset IV
• Reduce Afterload 221
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
• Reduce Afterload
– Arterial vasodilators • High dose Nitroglycerin
• Nitroprusside
• Neseritide
– Intra aortic balloon pump
• Increase Contractility – Positive Inotropes
• Dobutamine
• Milronone
• Dopamine
• Reduce Preload Diuretics Venous Vasodilators
Low dose NTG Neseritide
Ultrafiltration
222
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 111
223
Pharmacological Options for Decreasing
Preload
Stop or decrease fluid
Diuretics ▪ A loop diuretic such as furosemide eliminates
circulating volume
Venous
Vasodilators
▪ Intravenous nitroglycerin, neseritide, or
morphine sulfate
(Venous vasodilatation pools blood away from
the heart and decreases preload)
ACE Inhibitors or
Angiotensin II
Receptor Blockers
(ARBs)
▪ Interrupt renin- Angiotensin- aldosterone system. (RAAS).
Aldosterone secretion is decreased and there is less sodium and
water retention.
▪ ACE inhibitors end in “pril” / ARBs end in “sartan”
Aldosterone
antagonists
▪ Spironolactone or epleranone
▪ Directly block aldosterone and there is decreased sodium and water
retention.
• Preload Reduction – Venous Vasodilators
• Afterload Reduction – Arterial Vasodilators
• Three Primary Drugs – NTG
• IV Primary Venous Vasodilator
– Neseritide
• Mixed
– Nitroprusside
• Predominantly Arterial Vasodilator
Vasodilator Therapy
224
There are no data that suggest that intravenous vasodilators improve outcomes in the patient hospitalized with HF
Use of intravenous vasodilators is limited to the relief of dyspnea in the hospitalized HF patient with intact blood pressure. Yancy et al, 2013.
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 112
A Closer Look at Venous Versus Arterial Vasodilators
• Some medications do both
• Some depend on dose • Nesiritide
• NTG
• Nitroprusside
• CA Channel blockers
• PDE Inhibitors
• ACE Inhibitors
• Other Vasodilators
225
Nitroglycerin
• Mixed venous and arterial vasodilator – Dosage < 1mcg/kg/min = venous vasodilator
– Dosage > 1mcg/kg/min = arterial and venous vasodilator
• Primarily used as venodilator to quickly reduce preload – Sublingual tablets provide high enough dosage to
dilate arteries and veins
226
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 113
Nitroglycerin
• Side Effects: – H/A, – Hypotension, – Flushing
• Caution in patients with tachycardia or bradycardia
• Caution in severe aortic stenosis or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with obstruction
• Nursing Considerations: – Contraindicated with Sildenefil
like drugs – Caution (all venous vasodilators)
with: • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy,
aortic stenosis, right ventricular MI
– Treat H/A with pain meds and
decrease dose
– Onset IV: 1-2 minutes – Duration: 3-5 minutes
227
Nesiritide (Natrecor)
• Recombinant form of human B type natriuretic peptide (BNP)
• BNP is a naturally occurring cardiac neurohormone secreted by the heart in the body’s response to heart failure
• BNP allows the heart to participate in the regulation of vascular tone and extracellular volume status
• The BNP system and the renin-angiotensin system counteract each other in heart failure
• BNP levels are elevated in heart failure
228
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 114
Nesiritide (Natrecor)
• Balanced arterial and venous vasodilatation
– Causes rapid reduction in right and left sided ventricular filling pressures (preload reduction)
– Reduces afterload
• Indicated for acutely decompensated heart failure patients who have dyspnea at rest
229
Nesiritide (Natrecor)
• Patient must have systolic BP > 90 mmHg – Longer half-life
resulting in more persistent hypothension
• PAOP should be estimated to be > 20 mmHg
• Given by IV bolus and maintenance infusion (bolus to be taken from reconstituted IV bag and not from vial)
• Infusion is usually 24-48 hours
230
Monitor BP closely during administration.
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 115
Nesiritide: Where do we stand?
231
• Sackner-Bernstein et al., Short-term risk of death after treatment with nesiritide for decompensated heart failure: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2005, 293:1900-1905.
• 3 trials – randomized double-blind study of patients with ADHF
• 485 patients were randomized to nesiritide and 377 to control therapy.
• Death within 30 days tended to occur more often among patients randomized to nesiritide therapy (35 [7.2%] of 485 vs 15 [4.0%] of 377 patients. No statistically significant difference.
ASCEND HF Trial
232
• Effect of Nesiritide in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
• O'Connor et al. July 7 2011
• Randomized 7,141 patients
• Nesiritide was not associated with an increase or a decrease in the rate of death and re-hospitalization.
• It was not associated with a worsening of renal function, but it was associated with an increase in rates of hypotension.
• Neseritide cannot be recommended for routine use.
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 116
2013: ROSE Trial
• Low dose dopamine and low dose nesiritide against placebo for enhance decongestion
– Neither enhanced decongestion or improved renal function
• Difference in outcome between preserved and reduced ejection fraction (Sub Study analysis 2014)
– Low dose dopamine and low dose nesiritide impacted urine output in patients with HFrEF
233
Nitroprusside • Mixed venous and arterial
dilator (primarily arterial including pulmonary bed)
• Decreases BP, SVR, PVR, PAOP, RAP
• Uses:
– Hypertensive crisis
– CHF
– Acute Mitral Regurgitation
– Other Indications for Afterload Reduction
• Side Effects: – Hypotension – Thiocyanate toxicity:
tinnitus, blurred vision, delirium, seizures, muscle twitching, absent reflexes, dilated pupils [several days – high doses]
• Nursing Considerations: – Onset: 1-2 minutes – Duration: 1-10 minutes – Monitor BP carefully- arterial
line encouraged
234
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 117
If No Improvement With Preload Reduction
• Na and fluid restrict • Increase dose of loop
diuretic • Continuous infusion of
loop diuretic • Add 2nd diuretic PO
– Metalazone – Spironolactone
– OR IV chlorothiazide
• Low dose dopamine • Consider ultrafiltration
• Diuretic Resistance
– Reasons
• High sodium levels
• NSAIDs
• Severe renal impairment
• Renal hypoperfusion
235
• Ultrafiltration may be considered for patients with obvious volume overload to alleviate congestive symptoms and fluid weight (Class IIb Level of Evidence: B)
• Ultrafiltration may be considered for patients with refractory congestion not responding to medical therapy. (Class IIb Level of Evidence: C)
236
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 118
Ultrafiltration
UNLOAD Trial • Veno-venus ultrafiltration
(UF) vs standard IV diuretic therapy for hypervolemic HF
• 200 patients randomized
• UF with statistical significance for: greater weight loss (48 hours), greater fluid loss (48 hours), less 90-day resource utilization for HF.
• No statistically significant difference in dyspnea scores or creatinine levels (safety endpoint)
CARESS-HF Trial
• Treatment of ADHF, worsening renal function, persistent congestion with stepped pharmacologic approach vs ultrafiltration
• 188 patients randomized
• UF: inferior to pharmacologic therapy and associated with adverse events.
237
• Goal: Relief of symptoms and end organ perfusion
• Use in: – Low output states
– Symptomatic hypotension or marginal blood pressure
• Despite good filling pressures
• No magic blood pressure – look for symptoms
– Unresponsive / intolerant of IV vasodilators
– Diminished or worsening renal function
• Use vasodilators first as able
• Monitor closely for tachyarrhythmias and hypotension
• Not recommended if normotensive (ACC)
Increase Contractility Inotropes
238
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 119
Autonomic Nervous System
Sympathetic
Beta 1
HR
Contractility
Conductivity
Beta 2
Bronchodilation
Arterial Vasodilation
Alpha 1 Arterial
Vasoconstriction
Parasympathetic Vagal Response HR 239
A Closer Look at Sympathomimetics
• Sympathomimetics that increase contractility (inotropes) (β1 receptors)
– Epinephrine
– Dobutamine
– Dopamine
– Norepinephrine
240
Used primarily as
inotrope
Used primarily as
vasopressor but has
inotropic properties
when used
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 120
Dobutamine
241
What receptors are stimulated:
Primarily β1
Some alpha1 receptor stimulation
Some β2 stimulation
Modest β2 (more β2 than alpha1)
What are the resultant actions:
Increase contractility (+ inotrope) (β1)
Increase AV node conduction
Modest vasodilation
When and why do we use: Used as an inotrope (resultant preload reduction) with modest afterload reduction
(ACC / AHA Guidelines for Heart Failure*)
What are special nursing considerations:
Onset 1 to 2 minutes; Peak 10 minutes
Half-life 2 minutes
Note: Blood pressure response is variable; β2 causes vasodilatation; β1 increases cardiac output and may increase BP
Risk of ventricular arrhythmias
Synthetic Compound
Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors
• New generation: Milrinone (Primacor)
• Creates + inotropic effect by increasing availability of calcium • Inhibits the degradation of
cyclic AMP which is indirectly responsible for increasing the influx of calcium through the calcium channel
• Smooth muscle relaxant (venous and arterial vasodilator)
• Indications: – Refractory heart failure (in
combination with dobutamine)
– Left ventricular failure in MI
– Patients waiting transplant
• Side Effects: – Ventricular arrhythmias,
thrombocytopenia (new generation less)
• Nursing Considerations: – Onset IV: Immediate
– Peak: 10 minutes
242
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 121
Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors: Non Sympathomimetic Inotropes
243
Used as an
Inotrope
BUT…..
Also has……
Preload
Reduction
Afterload
Reduction
OPTIME Trial • Milrinone approved by FDA based on hemodynamic data • Future trials need to include symptom relief and post
discharge outcome data • OPTIME
– Prospective trial, randomized, placebo controlled – 951 patients – Patients had indication for but not all required inotrope for end
organ perfusion. – Results: No difference in LOS, No difference in subjective
improvement – Treatment failures more common in milrinone group due to
hypotension, more atrial fibrillation in milrinone – Not powered for mortality differences
– Conclusion: Hemodynamic improvement does not translate into clinical improvement
244
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 122
Dopamine
What receptors are stimulated:
Dopaminergic at low doses (0.5-2.0 mcg/kg/min)
β1 also at moderate doses ( 2.0-10.0 mcg/kg/min)
Pure alpha stimulation at high doses > 10mcg/kg/min
What are the resultant actions:
Increase GFR at low doses
Increase contractility at moderate doses (greater effects on contractility than heart rate)
Vasoconstriction (alpha) at high doses
When and why do we use:
Refractory hypotension / shock
* Not indicated for routine treatment or prevention of acute renal failure
What are special nursing considerations:
Onset 1-2 minutes; Peak 10 minutes
Maximal effects @20/mcg/kg/min
Large IV line or central line; Regitine (alpha blocker) for infiltrate
245
Mimics endogenous dopamine;
metabolic precursor
of norepinephrine and epinephrine
Comparison of Dopamine to Norepinephrine in Shock
246
• Backer et al.
• Multi Center Randomized Controlled Trial
• New England Journal of Medicine
• March 4th 2010
• There were no significant differences between the groups in the rate of death at 28 days or in the rates of death in the ICU, in the hospital, at 6 months, or at 12 months
• More patients with arrhythmia in the dopamine group
• Rate of death was higher in predefined subgroup analysis for patients with cardiogenic shock treated with dopamine.
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 123
247
INTRA AORTIC BALLOON PUMP
Can provide significant afterload reduction in acute decompensated heart failure
248
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 124
249
IABP: Counterpulsation Therapy
• Intra Aortic Balloon (IAB) is inflated during diastole and deflated during systole
• The IAB is a volume displacement device
• IAB Placement – Descending thoracic
aorta
– 1 to 2 cm below the subclavian artery origin
– Above renal and mesenteric arteries
250
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 125
252
Hemodynamic Impact of IAB Pumping
• Decreased systolic aortic pressure
• Decreased afterload – Decreased MVO2
• Decreased LV wall tension
• Decreased preload – Decreased pulmonary congestion
• Decreased HR
253
Indications / Contraindications
Indications • Cardiogenic shock.
• Recurrent ischemia / extending myocardial infarction.
• Unstable angina.
• Intractable ventricular dysrhythmias.
• Support for high risk intervention.
• Bridging device in acute cardiac failure.
• Mechanical defects such as acute mitral regurgitation.
• Post-operative myocardial dysfunction.
Absolute Contraindications • Aortic valve insufficiency /
regurgitation
• Dissecting aortic aneurysm
• Aortic stents
Relative Contraindications • Calcific aortic iliac disease
• Peripheral arterial disease
• Abdominal aortic aneurysm
• Thrombocytopenia
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 126
259
Discussion of Key Nursing Considerations
• Pressure assessment for optimization of therapy
• Balloon mobility
• Left radial pulse assessment
• Urine output
• Distal pulse assessment
• Groin care
• Platelets
• Other complications : aortic dissection
Impella • Temporary (≤ 6 hours)
ventricular support device
• Indicated for use during high risk PCI performed in elective or urgent hemodynamically stable patients with severe coronary artery disease and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction
• Pulls blood from the left ventricle and expels blood into the ascending aorta.
• Inserted via femoral artery, into the ascending aorta, across the valve and into the left ventricle.
• Produces CO of 2.5 – 5.0 L/Min (2 different devices) 260
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 127
• Complex patient
• Monitor for limb ischemia – at least hourly
• Anticoagulation required – maintain APTT for 45-55 seconds
• Monitor for hemolysis – Decreased HGB/HCT, haptoglobin
– Hemoglobinuria may develop and AKI
– Impella Console • P8 – performance level 8 is standard with 50,000 revolutions
per minute to provide a flow rate of 1.9-2.5 L/min of cardiac output
262
Impella – Nursing Care
• Physiologic Impact – Increase forward flow
– Unloads LV
– Augments cardiac output
– Increases mean arterial pressure
• Contraindications – Mechanical aortic valve
– Moderate to severe aortic disease
– Left ventricular thrombus
– Moderate to severe peripheral arterial disease
263
Impella
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 128
• Venous – arterial
– allows for gas exchange and provides hemodynamic support by bypassing the lungs and heart.
– can also work alongside native circulation allowing for a portion of the blood to flow naturally through the heart and lungs.
– Indicated in refractory cardiogenic shock or as salvage strategy during cardiac arrest after 10 minutes of unsuccessful advanced cardiac life support.
264
• Venous – venous – facilitates gas exchange but does not provide for hemodynamic
support because the blood is returned to the right side of the heart before it enters pulmonary circulation.
– Pump is necessary to pump venous blood through the membrane oxygenator.
– Used as an alternative strategy in adults with ARDS to rest the lungs and avoid insult of mechanical ventilation.
• Arterial – venous – a pumpless circuit – blood flows from the femoral artery through a membrane and
returns to the femoral vein. – Hemodynamic support comes from the patient’s own cardiac
output. – Absence of a pump makes this mode easier for transport.
However, cardiac function must be well preserved.
265
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 129
ECMO
266
TandemHeart
• Provides 5.0 liters of cardiac output
• Augment flow of blood
• Decompress the LV
• Temporary Cardiopulmonary bypass
• Takes blood from LA to Femoral artery
267
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 130
268
• Cardiac arrest with ongoing CPR
• Cardiogenic shock, IABP-dependent on inotropes and vasopressors
• Intra-operative failure to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass
• Bridge to a decision: indeterminate neurologic status or other significant co-morbidity (i.e., possible incurable malignancy) with critical clinical deterioration
269
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 131
ADDITIONAL CARE ISSUES
270
• Routine use not recommended
• When to consider:
– Refractory to initial therapy
– Volume status and cardiac filling pressures are unclear
– Pulmonary and systemic pressures unclear
– Clinically significant hypotension (SBP < 80 mm Hg)
– Worsening renal function
271
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 132
• Foley Catheter
– Not recommended routinely in heart failure
– If need to closely monitor hourly urine output
– Possible outlet obstruction
• High risk patients include those with BPH and or right sided volume overload
272
• Sodium restriction is reasonable for patients with symptomatic HF to reduce congestive symptoms (IIc)
• Clinicians should consider some degree of sodium restriction (< 3 grams /day) for patients with Stage C and D HF
273
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 133
• Dietary Sodium Restriction – Water follows sodium
• If hyponatremic – Serum sodium < 130 mEq/L
• 2 liters per day
– Serum Sodium < 125 mEq/L
• Stricter fluid restriction may be considered
• If persistent fluid overload – Assure sodium restriction in conjunction with fluid
restriction
274
• Oxygen therapy is recommended if the patient exhibits hypoxemia
• If not hypoxemic no need for oxygen therapy
• Use of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation may be considered for severely dyspneic patients with clinical evidence of pulmonary edema.
275
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 134
Manage Comorbidities
• Atrial fibrillation
• Valvular Heart Disease
• Renal dysfunction
• Sleep disorder breathing
• COPD
• Hypertension
• CAD
• Peripheral artery disease
• Anemia
• Diabetes
• Obesity
• Depression and anxiety
• Cognitive dysfunction
276
Atrial Fibrillation
277
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 135
The Scope of Atrial Fibrillation in HF
♥ HF patients are more likely than the general population to develop atrial fibrillation
♥ There is a direct relationship between NYHA class and the prevalence of AF
♥ 4% in NYHA Class I
♥ 40% in NYHA Class IV
♥ Independent risk factor for the development of HF
♥ AF worsens symptoms
♥ Worsens symptoms can result in inceased ventricular response
♥ Complicates HF Care 278
Classifications
♥ Recurrent – Two or more episodes of AF
♥ Paroxysmal – Terminates spontaneously
♥ Persistent – When sustained beyond 7 days
♥ Long Standing Persistent - Greater than 12 months
♥ Permanent – Opinion based on the provider and the patient to no
longer attempt to restore NSR
279 2017
Classifications
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 136
Atrial Fibrillation
• Rate control first and always a priority – Strict versus lenient (RACE II study) – Metoprolol (succinate / tartrate) versus carvedilol – Avoidance of calcium channel blockers in reduced LVEF – Digoxin (at rest versus activity) – Concern with AV node ablation
• When to choose rhythm control – AFFIRM and RACE: No mortality benefit with rhythm
control – Symptom control in HF – Antiarrhythmics for rhythm control in HF
• Stroke prevention 280
Additional Rate Control Information
RACE II • Strict versus lenient rate
control
• Strict – Resting HR < 80
– Exercise < 110
• Lenient – Resting HR < 110
• No benefit of strict rate control
• Note: Study population did not include a high percentage of patients with heart failure.
281
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 137
New 2014 Atrial Fibrillation Guideline Update
A randomized trial suggested that a lenient (<110 bpm) rate control strategy was as effective as a strict strategy (<80 bpm) in patients with persistent/permanent AF. However, the writing committee still advocates for the latter (Class IIa), as the results of this single trial were not thought to be definitive.
282
Pharmacological Considerations in Rate Control
• Calcium channel blockers versus beta blockers – All beta blockers and only two calcium channel blockers slow
conduction through AV node – Diltiazem very effective through the AV node – Metoprolol better at rate control than carvedilol
• Pros and Cons of Digoxin
– Blood pressure effect – Heart rate control at rest versus exercise
• Pros and Cons of Amiodarone – Limiting use of other antiarrhythmics (terminal half-life elimination 40
to 55 days) – May convert the patient
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 138
A Closer Look at Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil Dihydropyridines Diltiazem
Heart Rate ▼▼
▼
AV Nodal
Conduction
▼▼
------ ▼
Contractility ▼▼
▼ ▼
Arterial
Vasodilatation
284 2017
Antiarrhythmics in Atrial Fibrillation Class Specific
Medications
Purpose of Medication Major Cardiac Side Effects
Class I A
Class I B
Class I C
Disopyramide
Procainamide
Quinidine
Not used in atrial
fibrillation
Flecainide
Propofenone
Rhythm Control
Rhythm Control
Rhythm Control
Rhythm Control
Rhythm Control
Torsade de pointes, HF
Torsade de pointes
Torsade de pointes
Ventricular tachycardia , HF,
Atrial Flutter
Ventricular tachycardia , HF,
Atrial Flutter
Class II Beta Blockers Rate Control
Class III Amiodarone
Dronedarone
Dofetilide
Ibutilide
Sotalol (Also contains beta
blocker)
Rhythm / Rate Control
Rhythm Control
Rhythm Control
Rhythm Control
Rhythm Control (also
controls rate)
Torsade de pointes (rare)
* Organ toxicity
Torsade de pointes
Torsade de pointes
Torsade de pointes
Torsade de pointes, HF, Beta
blocker side effects
Class IV Calcium Channel
Blockers
Rate Control 285
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 139
286
In addition to cardiac criteria; sotolol and
dofetilide are renally cleared
Defined as wall thickness exceeding 1.5 cm.
Class III Antiarrhythmics
Action
Potential
Inhibits potassium ion fluxes during phase II and III of the
action potential
Actions Directly on myocardium to delay repolarization (prolongs QT);
prolongs effective refractory period in all cardiac tissue; By
definition act only on repolarization phase and should not
impact conduction
Cautions Proarrhythmic Effects (amiodarone less)
Uses Drug dependent
Drugs Amiodarone (Pacerone, Cordorone)
Dronedarone (Multaq)
Ibutilide (Corvert)
Dofetilide (Tikosyn) – most pure class III
Sotalol (Betapace) 287
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 140
Class III Antiarrhythmics
Amiodarone
(ARREST
Trial)
Survival to
hospital
admission
improved
29%
Approved for life threatening refractory ventricular
arrhythmias; considered before lidocaine in pulseless VT
or V fib; considered ahead of lidocaine for stable VT with
impaired cardiac function; expanded to atrial and
ventricular arrhythmias, conversion and maintenance of
atrial fib
Use in atrial fibrillation is off label
Slows conduction in accessory pathways
Originally marketed as anti-anginal (potent vasodilator)
Relaxes smooth and cardiac muscle, reduces afterload
and preload (well tolerated in heart failure and
cardiomyoapthy)
Proarrhythmias less frequent
Is also a weak sodium channel blocker, also has effects
similar to class II and IV, also has anticholinergic properties 288
More on Amiodarone
Advantages • Efficacious
• Works on atrial and ventricular arrhythmias
• One of few antiarrhythmics tolerated in HF
• Although prolongs QT – least likely to cause torsades
• IV use short term does not lead to extra cardiac effects
Potential Disadvantages
• Although it slow
conduction over accessary pathway – may slow it more over AV node and cannot be used in patients with WPW
• Long ½ life (40 to 55 days)limits the ability to change to another agent until amiodarone is cleared
289
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 141
Amiodarone and Iodine
• Amiodarone is an iodinated benzofuran derivative and inorganic iodine is released when the drug is administered. This could cause complications related to thyroid function, but this is a metabolic effect and is not related to an immunologic response or iodine in radiocontrast or food (Brouse, Sara D., and Stanley M. Phillips. "Amiodarone Use in Patients with Documented Allergy to Iodine‐Containing Compounds."Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy 25.3 (2005): 429-434.).
• "Hypersensitivity reaction to amiodarone in a patient with a previous reaction to an iodinated radiocontrast agent." Annals of Pharmacotherapy 41.7-8 (2007): 1310-1314.). Their argument is based upon the “Naranjo probability scale” or algorithim and the package insert. The label of amiodarone has the following statement “Cordarone is contraindicated in patients with a known hypersensitivity to the drug or to any of its components, including iodine.”
290
Potential Extra Cardiac Effects
Pulmonary toxicity without initial
symptoms / Potentially lethal interstitial pneumonitis /
Photosensitivity
Hepatotoxicity
Corneal micro deposits Optic neuropathy / neuritis
Thyroid dysfunction: Hyper or Hypo Amiodarone partially inhibits the peripheral conversion of T4 to T3. Serum T4 and reverse T3 may be increased and T3 may be decreased.
By weight amiodarone is 37% iodine Toxic side effects increase with length of use and increased dose
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 142
Amiodarone Monitoring
• ECG for HR, AV block and QT interval – Monitor potassium and
magnesium
• Baseline PFTs and CXR – Annual CXR – Monitor for signs of
pulmonary toxicity (i.e. non productive cough, dyspnea)
• Semi annual LFTs • Baseline thyroid function
– Monitor for signs / symptoms of thyroid dysfunction
– Q 3 to 6 months
• Monitor for CNS effects (ataxia, tremor, dizziness, peripheral neuropathy, and delirium)
• Regular ophthalmic exams • Monitor pacing and
defibrillation thresholds if device in place
• Therapeutic level is 0.5 to 2.5 mg/L – Desethyl metabolite is active
and present in equal concentration to the parent drug.
292
293
Dronedarone (Multaq)
• Rejected by FDA 2006
• Approved by FDA 2009
• Decreases hospitalizations in atrial fibrillation
– Not permanent atrial fibrillation
• Proposed safer alternative to amiodarone in terms of extra cardiac side effects
– Iodine content
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 143
Dronedarone
• Similar to amiodarone without iodine component and less fat soluble
• Class III antiarrhythmic (K+ channel blocker) with effects from all four classes
• Less effective than amiodarone at maintaining sinus rhythm but also less toxic
• Elimination half-life 13-19 hours
• Has both rate and rhythm control effects but is primarily indicated for rhythm control
• May reduce incidence of stroke (mechanism uncertain)
294
Dronedarone (ATHENA)
• Approved for maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with history of paroxysmal or persistent AF or flutter with EF > 35% who are in sinus rhythm or will be cardioverted
• Dose: 400 mg PO bid with meals (no grapefruit juice)
• Contraindicated in patients with NYHA Class IV HF or NYHA Class II-III HF with recent decompensation requiring hospitalization or referral to a specialized HF clinic – > twofold increase in mortality in HF patients
• Side Effects – GI, skin disorders
– Can prolong QTc but low risk of Torsades
– Increases serum creatinine
– Interferes with digoxin metabolism
Concern: LIVER Dysfunction: 1/2011
295
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 144
Atrial Fibrillation 2011 Focused Update ACCF/AHA/HRS Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines
Class II A Recommendation:
Dronedarone is reasonable to decrease the need for hospitalization for cardiovascular events in patients with paroxysmal AF or after conversion of persistent AF. Dronedarone can be initiated during outpatient therapy (Level of Evidence: B)
Reduces risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation after cardioversion by 25%.
296
Class III Recommendation: Dronedarone SHOULD NOT BE ADMINISTERED to patients with class IV heart failure or patients who have had an episode of decompensated heart failure in the past 4 weeks, especially if they have depressed left ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction 35%)
(Level of Evidence: B)
297
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 145
CHA2DS2VASc
• C – HF or LVEF < 35%
• H – Hypertension
• A2 – < 65 (0), 65 to 74 (1), and > 75 (2)
• D – Diabetes Mellitus
• S2 – Stroke, TIA, or Thromboembolism (2)
• VA – Vascular Disease
• Sc – Gender (Female = 1)
• http://www.mdcalc.com/cha2ds2-vasc-score-for-atrial-fibrillation-stroke-risk/
299
Anticoagulation
Nonvalvular AF patients with: 1. CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2, oral anticoagulation
is recommended (Class I). 2. CHA2DS2-VASc score of 0, it is reasonable to
omit antithrombotic therapy (Class IIa). 3. CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1: no antithrombotic
therapy, oral anticoagulation, or aspirin (Class IIb).
4. Options for oral anticoagulation include warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban.
300
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 146
Obstruction of flow at the level of the aortic valve.
301
302
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 147
303
• Rarely needed • HR/rhythm control • ACE Inhibitors: Not in severe AS
– Development of hypotension and syncope • Nitroglycerin: With Caution
– Low dose: Impact on preload – High dose: Impact on afterload
• Beta blockers: Contraindicated in severe AS – Blocks normal adrenergic response of increased HR
304
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 148
• Volume Management – Precarious
• Exercise – No restriction in asymptomatic mild AS – Asymptomatic patients with moderate or severe AS
• Avoid competitive sports • Evaluate tolerance to exercise per stress test
• Continuous physician follow up – Annual exams
• History and physical • Serial echocardiogram
• Endocarditis prophylaxis – 2007 AHA Guidelines
305
306
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 149
Recommendations COR LOE Exercise testing is reasonable to assess physiological changes with exercise and to confirm the absence of symptoms in asymptomatic patients with a calcified aortic valve and an aortic velocity 4.0 m per second or greater or mean pressure gradient 40 mm Hg or higher (stage C)
IIa B
Exercise testing should not be performed in symptomatic patients with AS when the aortic velocity is 4.0 m per second or greater or mean pressure gradient is 40 mm Hg or higher (stage D)
III: Harm
B
307
Aortic Stenosis: Timing of Intervention
Recommendations COR LOE AVR is recommended with severe high-gradient AS who have symptoms by history or on exercise testing (stage D1)
I B
AVR is recommended for asymptomatic patients with severe AS (stage C2) and LVEF <50%
I B
AVR is indicated for patients with severe AS (stage C or D) when undergoing other cardiac surgery
I B
308
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 150
Aortic Stenosis: Choice of Surgical or Transcatheter Intervention (2017 Update)
Recommendations COR LOE Surgical AR is recommended for symptomatic patients with severe AS and asymptomatic patients with severe AS who meet an indication for AVR when surgical risk is low or intermediate
I B-NR
For patients in whom TAVR or high-risk surgical AVR is being considered, members of a Heart Valve Team should collaborate closely to provide optimal patient care
I C
Surgical AVR or TAVR is recommended for symptomatic patients with severe AS and high risk for surgical AVR, depending on patient-specific procedural risks, values, and preferences.
I A
TAVR is recommended for symptomatic patients with severe AS (Stage D) and a prohibitive risk for surgical AVR who have a predicted post-TAVR survival is > 12 months
I A 309
• Balloon placed across aortic valve • Fractures calcium deposits in the leaflets • Separate fused or calcified commissures • Considered palliative in the aortic position
(Class IIB) • May be used as a bridge to surgery (Class
IIB) • All benefit gone in 6 months • Development of or increased severity of AR
• Not appropriate if AR > 2+ prior to procedure
310
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 151
311
• Mitral valve replacement highest risk for embolization
• Warfarin for all patients
– INR goal 2.5-3.0
• Life-long ASA 75-100mg in addition to warfarin
• On-X Aortic Heart Valve
– Target INR of 1.5-2.0 (Class IIB)
• Warfarin for 3 months post op in all patients (especially MV)
• Life-long ASA 75-100mg
TAVR - Warfarin may be
reasonable for at least 3 months
- Target INR 2.5 - Clopidogrel 1st 6 months - Life-long ASA 75-100mg
312
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 152
313
• Annulus
• Leaflets
• Chordae Tendineae
• Papillary Muscles
314
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 153
• Remain asymptomatic for years • Most frequent
– Fatigue – Dyspnea on exertion
• Progress to include – Paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea – Orthopnea – Palpitations from atrial fibrillation
• Initial diagnosis sometimes made with new onset AF
• Mitral valve prolapse patients early on report symptoms of tachycardia, orthostatic hypotension or panic attacks
315
• EF < 60% considered abnormal
• Surgical options include: – Mitral valve repair
– Mitral valve replacement with preservation of mitral apparatus
– Mitral valve replacement with removal of mitral apparatus
• Mortality rates in those >75 higher with mitral valve surgery than aortic valve
• Mortality rates less with repair than replacement
316
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 154
RECOMMENDATIONS COR LOE
MV Surgery recommended for symptomatic patients with chronic severe primary MR and LVEF greater than 30%
I B
MV surgery is recommended for asymptomatic patients with chronic severe primary MR and LV dysfunction (LVEF 30% to 60% and/or left ventricular end-systolic diameter ≥40 mm
I B
MV repair is recommended in preference to MVR when surgical treatment is indicated for patients with chronic severe primary MR limited to the posterior leaflet
I B
Mitral valve repair is recommended in preference to MVR when surgical treatment is indicated for patients with chronic severe primary MR involving the anterior leaflet or both leaflets when a successful and durable repair can be accomplished
I B
Concomitant mitral valve repair or MVR is indicated in patients with chronic severe primary MR undergoing cardiac surgery for other indications
I B
317
Transcatheter MV repair may be considered for severely symptomatic patients (NYHA class III/IV) with chronic severe primary MR (stage D) who have a reasonable life expectancy but a prohibitive surgical risk because of severe comorbidities
318
video
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 155
319
• In patients at increased risk, stage A HF, the optimal blood pressure in those with hypertension should be less than 130/80 mm Hg (I)
• Patients with HFrEF and hypertension should be prescribed GDMT titrated to attain systolic blood pressure less than 130 mm Hg (I)
• Patients with HFpEF and persistent hypertension after management of volume overload should be prescribed GDMT titrated to attain systolic blood pressure less than 130 mm Hg (I) 320
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 156
COR LOE Recommendations
IIa B-R In patients with NYHA class II and III HF and iron deficiency (ferritin <100 ng/mL or 100 to 300 ng/mL if transferrin saturation is <20%), intravenous iron replacement might be reasonable to improve functional status and QoL
321
COR= Class of Recommendation (strength); yellow, is reasonable/useful (Moderate) LOE = Level of Evidence (Quality); B = moderated quality; 1 or more randomized trials; GDEM: Guideline-directed evaluation and management
Yancy C, Jessup M, et al. Circulation. 2017
COR LOE Recommendations
III No
benefit
B-R In patients with HF and anemia, erythropoietinstimulating agents should not be used to improve morbidity and mortality
322
COR= Class of Recommendation (strength); yellow, is reasonable/useful (Moderate) LOE = Level of Evidence (Quality); B = moderated quality; 1 or more randomized trials; GDEM: Guideline-directed evaluation and management
Yancy C, Jessup M, et al. Circulation. 2017
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 157
• Apnea: cessation of breathing for greater than 10 seconds
• Hypopnea: decrease in airflow for greater than 10 seconds with a 30% reduction in oxygenation
• Apnea-Hypopnea Index: index of sleep apnea severity
• OSA: Obstructive Sleep Apnea
• CSA: Central Sleep Apnea
323
• STOP Bang
• Physical Exam – BMI . 30
– Neck circumference >17 inches (male) or > 16 (female)
– oropharyngeal exam
• Diagnosis: Polysomnogram
• Apnea-Hyponea Index – < 5 medically manage
– 5-15 – mild OSA
– 15-30 – moderate OSA
– > 30 – severe OSA
• Treatment – CPAP
– BiPAP
– Adaptive servo-ventilation
324
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 158
325
• In patients with NYHA class II–IV HF and suspicion of sleep disordered breathing or excessive daytime sleepiness, a formal sleep assessment is reasonable (IIa)
• In patients with cardiovascular disease and obstructive sleep apnea, CPAP may be reasonable to improve sleep quality and daytime sleepiness(IIb)
• In patients with NYHA class II–IV HFrEF and central sleep apnea, adaptive servo-ventilation causes harm (III: HARM)
326
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 159
• Exacerbating factors addressed
• Near optimal volume status achieved
• Transition from intravenous to oral diuretic successfully completed
• Patient and family education completed, including clear discharge instruction
• LVEF documented
• Smoking cessation counseling initiated
• Near optimal pharmacologic therapy achieved, including ACE inhibitor and beta-blocker (for patients with reduced LVEF), or intolerance documented
• Follow-up clinic visit scheduled, usually for 7 to 10 d
327
• Advanced HF Patient or recurrent admission – Oral medication regimen stable for 24 h
– No intravenous vasodilator or inotropic agent for 24 h
– Ambulation before discharge to assess functional capacity after therapy
– Plans for post discharge management (scale present in home, visiting nurse or telephone follow up generally no longer than 3 d after discharge)
– Referral for disease management, if available
328
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 160
“Advanced”
“End-Stage”
“Refractory”
329
330
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 161
331
• NYHA class IIIb or IV on optimal medical therapy • Repeated episodes of fluid retention (pulmonary
and/or systemic congestion, peripheral edema) and/or reduced cardiac output at rest (peripheral hypoperfusion) on optimal medical therapy
• Objective evidence of severe cardiac dysfunction shown by at least 1 of the following on optimal medical therapy: – LVEF <30% – Mean PCWP >16 mmHg and/or RAP >12 mmHg by PA
catheterization – High BNP or NT-proBNP plasma levels in the absence of non-
cardiac causes
332
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 162
• Severe impairment of functional capacity while on optimal medical therapy shown by 1 of the following: – Inability to exercise
– 6-Minute walk distance < 300 m
– Peak Vo2 <12 to 14 mL/kg/min
• History of > 1 HF hospitalization in past 6 months
• Presence of all the previous features despite “attempts to optimize” therapy, including diuretics and GDMT, unless these are poorly tolerated or contraindicated, and CRT when indicated
333
• Repeated (≥2) hospitalizations or ED visits for HF in the past year or > 1 hospitalization for heart failure
• Progressive deterioration in renal function
• Progressive decline in serum sodium, usually to <133 mEq/L
• Weight loss without other cause
• Intolerance to ACE inhibitors due to hypotension and/or worsening renal function
• Intolerance to beta blockers due to worsening HF or hypotension
• Frequent systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg
• High diuretic requirements to maintain volume status (i.e. furosemide equivalent dose >160 mg/d and/or use of supplemental metolazone therapy)
• Frequent ICD shocks
334
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 163
• Heart Failure Survival Score – All cause mortality
• Seattle Heart Failure Model – All cause mortality, urgent transplantation or LVAD
implant • EVEREST Risk Model
– Combined endpoint of mortality or persistently poor quality of life over the 6 months after discharge
• EFFECT – 30-day and 1-year mortality
• ADHERE – In-hospital mortality
• ESCAPE Discharge Score – 6 month mortality
335
• >2 should Prompt Referral for Advanced Rx • Hospitalization for HF on oral HF therapy • Inability to take ACEI/ARB/BB • BUN> 45, Creat>2.5, CrCl< 45 cc/min • BNP >4 x’s upper limit of normal • Na+ < 136 • Malnutrition/Cachexia • VO2 <55% predicted • LVEDD >7.0 cm
336
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 164
End of Life Decision Making
• Palliative Care versus Hospice
– When should they be involved
– Should be involved with all patients being considered for transplant or VAD implant
– Never to early to get them involved
• Make an assessment – Help patient and family understand the trajectory
of the disease process
• Have the discussion
337
Components of effective shared decision making include:
• Establishing trust • Identifying patient values, preferences, and goals for
care early in the course of treatment • Using the framework “Ask-Tell-Ask” to determine both
what patients know and what they want to know • Understanding the reasons why there are conflicts
regarding decisions of care • Using numeric data in a clear and understandable way
as a decision aid • Respecting that patient’s may change their goals as the
disease progresses
Allen, 2012. 338
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 165
Palliative Care
• An approach that improves the quality of life of patients and their families facing the problem associated with life-threatening illness, through the prevention and relief of suffering by means of early identification and impeccable assessment and treatment of pain and other problems, physical, psychosocial and spiritual. (World Health Organization)
• Focuses on providing patients with relief from the symptoms and stress of a serious illness. The goal is to improve quality of life for both the patient and the family.
339
Palliative Care
• Provides relief from pain and other distressing symptoms;
• Affirms life and regards dying as a normal process;
• Intends neither to hasten or postpone death;
• Integrates the psychological and spiritual aspects of patient care;
• Offers a support system to help patients live as actively as possible until death;
• Offers a support system to help the family cope during the patients illness and in their own bereavement;
• Uses a team approach to address the needs of patients and their families, including bereavement counselling, if indicated;
• Will enhance quality of life, and may also positively influence the course of illness;
• Applicable early in the course of illness, in conjunction with other therapies that are intended to prolong life, such as chemotherapy or radiation therapy, and includes those investigations needed to better understand and manage distressing clinical complications.
• Can help decide when end of life care is appropriate 340
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 166
Hospice Care
• Care provided to patients with a life expectancy of six months or less.
• No longer seeking a cure • Aims to make remaining time as comfortable and
as meaningful as possible. • Relief of pain • Emotional support (for patient and family) and
help with everyday tasks. • Goal: Ensure every moment counts, in the last six
months of life.
341
Continuous Inotropic Support
• Reasonable to bridge therapy in patients eligible for MCS or transplant
• Long-term, continuous intravenous inotropic support may be considered as palliative therapy for symptom control in select patients with stage D HF despite optimal GDMT and device therapy who are not eligible for either MCS or cardiac transplantation.
No mortality benefit to long term inotropic therapy. May cause harm. 342
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 167
Home Inotropic Therapy
STAGE D HF Patients Positive IV inotropes commonly used include dopamine, dobutamine and milrinone. They are recommended for patients who: • Are unable to wean from intravenous to oral therapy • Are not likely to survive discharge without ongoing
inotropic support • Have repeatedly failed all alternative attempts to achieve
stability • Are awaiting cardiac transplant • Are receiving therapy as part of an overall plan to allow the
patient to die at home
343
• Stage D Heart Failure and acute decompensated HF not responding to treatment
• Bridge to transplant (BTT) for those who are transplant eligible
• Destination therapy (DT) for those who are not transplant eligible.
• Bridge to Candidacy (BTC)
• Careful consideration for all therapies – Some patients may be too ill with multisystem issues to benefit
from MCS
– Some decisions are best made in the hands of the most experienced centers
344
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 168
Absolute and Relative Contraindications for Durable MCS
Absolute Contraindications Relative Contraindications
· Irreversible hepatic disease · Irreversible renal disease · Irreversible neurological disease · Major coagulopathy · Right sided heart failure (unless
candidate for biventricular support)
· Medical non-adherence · Severe psychosocial limitations
· * Hypertrophic, infiltrative, or restrictive cardiomyopathy
· Uncorrectable moderate or greater aortic insufficiency
· Age _80 y(for destination therapy) · Obesity or malnutrition · MS disease that impairs rehabilitation · Active systemic infection · Prolonged intubation · Untreated malignancy · Severe PVD · Active substance abuse · Impaired cognitive function · Unmanaged psychiatric disorder · Lack of social support
Source: Peura et al., 2012; Slaughter et al., 2010. * May be a relative contraindication
347
348
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 169
• IABP
• ECMO
• Percutaneously implanted MCS
– Impella
– Tandem Heart
• Surgically implanted extracorporeal MCS
– CentriMag
– Thoratec pVAD II
– Abiomed BVS 5000
– Abiomed AB 5000
351
Bridge to Transplant
• Extracorporeal MCS – Thoratec pVAD II
• Implantable MCS – Heart Mate II
– HeartWare HVAD
• Total Artificial Heart – CardioWest
– Abiomed: Abiocor II
Destination Therapy
• Heart Mate II
• HeartWare HVAD
• Investigational Devices
352
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 170
Heart Mate II
353
HeartWare HVAD
354
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 171
Care Considerations
• Reliable social support
• Potential complications
• Patient Expectations
355
Cardiac Transplant
• Evaluation for cardiac transplantation is indicated for carefully selected patients with stage D HF despite GDMT, device, and surgical management.
• Stage D HF patients with a poor prognosis should be referred to a cardiac transplantation center for evaluation and transplant consideration
356
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 172
Key Strategies in the Treatment of HF
EDUCATION
EDUCATION
EDUCATION 357
I sure hope my wife is getting
this?
Are we going to be able to
afford these medications?
BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH!
ANY QUESTIONS? No, I think
we’ve got it.
358
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 173
Discharge Focus 1. Diet and nutrition
2. Discharge medications
3. Activity level
4. Follow up appointments
5. Daily weight
6. Response to symptoms: Who to call
359
Hospital education should be limited to “essential” education
ACC / AHA Guidelines
“the addition of a 1-hour, nurse educator– delivered teaching session at
the time of hospital discharge using standardized instructions resulted in
improved clinical outcomes, increased self-care measure adherence, and
reduced cost of care”
360
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 174
Education and Counseling
• Individualized education and counseling to focus on self care • Patients’ literacy, cognitive status, psychological state, culture, and
access to social and financial resources should be taken into account
• Treat depression and anxiety to improve education comprehension
• Repeat, repeat, repeat • Use “teach back” method
• Hospital education should be limited to “essential” education
• Should be delivered by providers using a team approach in
which nurses with expertise in HF management provide the majority of education and counseling (HFSA 2010).
361
Who should be involved?
362
Identify primary care giver / support person and include
in ALL education.
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 175
The Best Treatment Patient Education & Self-Care Maintenance and Self-Care Management
• Self-care maintenance – following the rules and instructions related to the disease
process
• Self-care management – decision-making process and critical thinking to make
decisions in response to changes in the client’s current health status
363
Self-Care Behaviors
• Daily weight monitoring; avoidance of high sodium foods, taking of all prescribed medication
• Smoking cessation; avoidance of heavy alcohol intake
• Avoidance of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and other over-the-counter herbal therapies and drugs, especially decongestants and sodium-based antacids
• Monitoring for changes in HF signs and symptoms; Responding to symptoms (first person to call for all issues or when to call which member on the team)
• Activity and exercise: easy warm up/cool down; getting started; when to stop or slow down
364
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 176
Barriers to Self-Care Management
• Lack of knowledge
• Literacy
• Multiple medications
• Fear of medication side effects
• Living alone (lack of social support)
• Memory problems
• Higher acuity
• Multiple needs – Co-morbidities
• Shorter LOS
• Noncompliance
• Transportation issues
• Financial concerns
• Depression / anxiety
365
The Big Picture
• What HF is, its causes and symptoms, timeline (chronic), consequences (poor prognosis; premature death; greater risk for hospitalization) and measures to control it (self-care actions and monitoring)
• Importance of provider follow up and ongoing monitoring
• Why drugs are used in HF; how they improve survival or reduce symptoms; Understanding reason for uptitration; how to take medications for greatest effectiveness; common adverse effects
367
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 177
Medications
• Don’t wait until discharge!
Include the person who will assist with medication What is the plan for filling prescriptions? What is the system for medication administration used
at home?
• Need to know trade/generic names • Issue of medication reconciliation
– Use of instruction sheets versus labeled pill bottles
• Don’t use term “meds as at home”
368
Medications
• Alternatives for routine schedule – Diuretics after errands – Flexible diuretic dosing – ACE inhibitor at night
Discussion regarding medications to avoid
Non-steroidals
Adherence history Financial concerns Importance of not running out of their medication (refill verifications with pharmacy) Regular follow-up with provider to monitor labs
369
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 178
Fluid Volume Status
• Causes of intravascular volume overload; can occur silently (without symptoms)
• Role of excess sodium in fluid retention
• How diuretics work
• Rationale for BID dosing if CKD
• Role of additional thiazide diuretic
• Need to know when NOT to take diuretics 370
Daily Weights
• Use same scale, same amount of clothing
• Empty bladder and before breakfast
• Record!!
• Report 2 pounds in one day or 3 to 4 pounds in a week
• Many patients don’t call because they feel “OK”
• Barriers: Confusion fluid gain from over eating gain
• Use of device data
• Do you weight all patients with heart failure daily while hospitalized even when admitted for non cardiac reasons?
• Special considerations with ECF – concern for weight loss 371
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 179
Response to Symptoms
• Focus on changes! – Is there a change in their activity tolerance?
– Impact on their ADL’s?
– Pants are becoming tight?
– Unable to sleep lying flat?
372
Diet and Nutrition
Moderate sodium restriction
Exact amount is not known
Most have moderate restriction when attempting to diurese
May liberalize when nutrition or orthostatic hypotension is a concern
Nutritional support for cardiac cachexia
Caloric supplementation
Limit alcohol
373
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 180
Low Sodium Tips
“Low” sodium considered to be <4 grams / day
2-3 grams / day recommended for patient with clinical syndrome of heart failure < 2 grams with moderate to severe heart failure
Discuss how sodium impacts fluid retention
Salt = sodium
Focus on what they can eat
High sodium foods Approximately 70% of sodium
intake comes from processed and pre-packaged foods.
374
Low Sodium Tips
• Dining at restaurants or in another person’s home • Reading labels
– Per SERVING • Percent sodium (or) • mg sodium per serving
• Salt used in cooking • Sodium alternatives • Be realistic – there must be joy in life • AHA: Eat Less Salt resource book
• Teach people how to do rather than tell them what to do!! 375
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 181
Fluid Limitation
• In the outpatient fluid restrictions reserved for patients with advanced heart failure refractory to high dose oral diuretics
• Indicated in the hospital setting in the presence of severe hyponatremia – Sodium level < 130 mEq/L (2L)
– - Sodium < 125 mEq (< 2L)
• Explain the thirst mechanism 376
Activity
• Screen for depression
• Evaluate anxiety levels
• Exercise training should be considered for all stable outpatients with chronic HF who are able to participate in protocols needed to produce physical conditioning. – Get them in Cardiac Rehab if systolic HF or diagnosis of stable
angina
– Consider pulmonary rehab if co-existing COPD
– 30 minutes moderate activity / exercise 5 days per week
• Work if at all possible 377
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 182
Follow Up
• Contact within 48-72 hours from discharge
• Appointment within on week from discharge
• Will need to have actual date, time and location included in discharge instructions
• Enrollment in a HF Clinic • Allows for up titration of medications
• Continues evaluation for progression of disease – Need for ICD
– Need for CRT
– Referral for advanced therapies
– End of life planning
378
IS THERE ONE CORRECT ANSWER?
379
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 183
Readmission Data
• Nearly 2 million Medicare patients readmitted within 30 day of discharge
• Cost of those readmissions = $17.5 BILLION • National average for readmission 19% • Readmissions a symptom of an overly expensive
and uncoordinated healthcare system – Limited connection from inpatient to outpatient
• HF readmissions rate 20-25% at 30 days – > 50% at 6 months – 35% of 30 day readmissions due to HF
380
What We Know • Readmissions are prevalent and costly • Adverse events associated with hospital discharge are common
– And about ¼ of them are readmissions
• Patients are not taking ideal medication regimens • No f/u on meds, tests and workups is common • Real room for improving hospital-receiver communication
– Value of PCP f/u unclear – probably ; might not be as powerful as hospitalist f/u
• Creating the perfect in-house discharge process probably won’t make enough difference
• SES is probably related to readmission risk – But the CMS measures do not adjust for it
• Ideal risk identification strategies are unavailable • Clinicians often have a different perspective on what led to the
readmission than patients do
381
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 184
• 60% due to poor adherence to dietary and pharmacologic regimins
• Worsening cardiac function
• Arrhythmias – new onset atrial fibrillation or recurrence
– VT,VF
• CAD
• Adverse effects of cardiac medications
• Patient not adequately decongested before discharge
• Discharge regimen not adequately established – Transition from IV to PO diuretic
Readmission Reasons
382
High Risk for Readmission
• AGE/Ethnicity/Gender – >75 years
– African Americans
– Males
• Comorbid conditions – A Fib
– CAD
– HPTN
– DM
– Lung Disease
• Hemodynamics
• Previous admission ED visits
• Hyponatremia
• Anemia
• Elevated BNP
• Elevated Troponin –T
• Worsening renal function
• Elevated Cystatin Level
• Depression
• Limited Health Literacy
• Low socioeconomic status
• Lack of family support
• Low patient engagement 383
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 185
Multidimensional Nursing Roles
• Coordinate care with interdisciplinary team members who can target coexisting medical, social, and financial issues
• Facilitate behavioral strategies that ease patient and caregiver burdens related to adherence to the treatment plan
• Educate on advance directive planning and community services that meet learning needs
• Promote continuity of care between home, HF clinic, or palliative care services – Foster collaborative relationships – Coach collaborators to use evidence-based therapies – Ensure open communication – Position patients and caregivers to proactively assess and manage signs and symptoms of
worsening condition
• Assess goal progression • Recognize and target unresolved HF issues
384
Consider
• BNP Level at discharge compared to admission
• Ambulation to assess functional class
• Orthostatic blood pressure evaluation
• Off IV medications at least 24 hours
• Off inotropes at least 24 hours
• Referrals made
• Education complete
385
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 186
Role of Technology
• Home weight monitoring system
• Device monitoring
• CardioMEMS
386
Transitional Care
• Actions designed to ensure coordination and continuity of health care when patients move from one level to the next
• Lapses
– Absent or limited clinical information
– Lack of care plan content
– Errors related to medications
387
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 187
Successful Transitional Care
• Risk vs benefit of transfer evaluated • Appropriateness of new care setting determine
the transfer decision • Communication between sending and receiving
provider • Preparation of patient and care giver • Follow up plan
– Tests – Appointments – Medications
388
Transitional Care Interventions
• Systematic review 47 trails • At 30 days a high intensity home-visiting program reduced
all cause readmissions and death • At 3-6 months home-visiting programs and
multidisciplinary heart failure clinic (MDS-HF) interventions reduced all cause readmissions. (not STS or telemonitoring)
• Structured telephone support (STS) reduced HF specific readmissions but not all cause readmissions
• Mortality benefit with MDS-HF clinic, home-visiting programs, and STS
• Based on current evidence, telemonitoring interventions (non structured) and primarily educational interventions are not efficacious for reducing readmissions or mortality
Feltner, C., Jones, C. D., Cené, C. W., Zheng, Z. J., Middleton, J. C., & Jonas, D. E. (2014). Transitional Care Interventions to Prevent Readmissions for Persons With Heart Failure. Ann Intern Med, 160, 774-784.
389
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 188
390
391
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 189
Quality Improvement
• Process of purposeful change toward meeting accepted quality standards
• Must have indicators to evaluate success
• Clinical Practice Guidelines provide
• Outcomes
– Structure
– Process
– Outcomes
392
Quality
Structure
• Relate to organizational structure and delivery of care
• Phone support
• Documentation tools – HER
Process
• Measures how recommended care is provided
• Core measures
• Correct Beta blocker order
• Documentation of discharge instructions
• Documentation of LV function
393
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 190
Outcome Indicators
• Mortality
• LOS
• Readmission
• Cost
• Quality of life
• Functional class
394
Accreditation Agencies
• Joint Commission Certification
• Society of Cardiovascular Care (previously Society of Chest Pain Centers)
• Healthcare Accreditation Colloquium
395
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 191
396
You are caring for a patient admitted with acute decompensated heart failure. Physical assessment reveals orthopnea, elevated neck veins, crackles throughout both lungs, skin is warm and
diaphoretic. BP is 140/80, HR 96, RR 28. Which of the following drugs do you anticipate administering:
A. IV furosemide and a dobutamine infusion.
B. Hydrochlorothiazide and a dopamine infusion.
C. IV furosemide and a nitroglycerine infusion.
D. Dobutamine infusion and a nitroprusside infusion.
397
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 192
A positive hepatojugular reflux test refers to:
A. Elevation of neck veins when pressure is applied to the sternum in right ventricular failure.
B. Elevation of neck veins when firm pressure is applied over the liver in right ventricular failure.
C. Regurgitation of liver contents into the neck veins.
D. Regurgitation of stomach contents into the esophagus in liver failure.
398
Your patient presents with acute respiratory distress, crackles half way up bilaterally, elevated neck veins, and cool
extremities with weak peripheral pulses. You assess his peripheral perfusion and pulmonary congestion status to be:
A. Congestion, peripheral hypoperfusion.
B. Congestion, normal perfusion.
C. No congestion, normal perfusion.
D. No congestion, peripheral hypoperfusion.
399
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 193
Drugs with a positive mortality benefit in heart failure include:
A. Dobutamine, milrinone. Diuretics, calcium channel blockers.
B. Calcium channel blockers, digoxin, beta blockers, ACE inhibitors.
C. Digoxin, diuretics, beta blockers, calcium channel blockers.
D. Beta blockers, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, aldosterone blockers.
400
Which type of diuretic is the first line choice for managing heart failure:
A. Thiazide Diuretic
B. Loop Diuretic
C. Potassium sparing diuretic
D. Combination loop and thiazide diuretic
401
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 194
The following are signs and symptoms specific to right sided heart failure:
A. JVD, hepatojugular reflux, cough.
B. JVD, engorged liver, crackles.
C. JVD, hepatojugular reflux, gut edema.
D. Crackles, cough, orthopnea.
402
Which of the following describes systolic dysfunction or HFrEF:
A. Ejection fraction of 60% with clear lungs.
B. Thin walled, dilated left ventricle, ejection fraction 35%.
C. Thick ventricular walls, normal LV cavity size, ejection fraction 50%.
D. Impaired relaxation of the LV with reduced LV filling.
403
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 195
The most common cause of right ventricular failure is:
A. Right ventricular myocardial infarction
B. Pulmonary embolism
C. Pulmonary hypertension
D. Left ventricular failure
404
Compensatory mechanisms in heart failure that contribute to the symptoms and to the progression of
heart failure include:
A. Sympathetic nervous system and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system stimulation.
B. Natriuretic peptides.
C. Prostaglandins and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP).
D. Nitric oxide and bradykinin.
405
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 196
Your outpatient patient being managed for chronic heart failure on routine lab draw has a potassium of 5.5. The rest of his basic metabolic panel is normal.
What should you consider?
A. Admit him to the hospital for management
B. Redraw the level assuming this is a lab error
C. Have him take Kayexalate to bring the potassium down
D. Ask him to stop his aldosterone antagonist then repeat level in 3 to 5 days.
406
Diastolic heart failure, or HFpEF, is best defined as:
A. Impaired ability of the left ventricle to relax and fill.
B. Impaired ability of the left ventricle to contract and effectively eject blood.
C. Heart failure with an elevated diastolic blood pressure.
D. Heart failure in which diastole is shortened.
407
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 197
When caring for a patient with chronic heart failure the nurse recognizes that the following may predispose the
patient to the development of hyperkalemia:
A. ACE Inhibitors
B. Aldosterone antagonists
C. Salt Substitutes
D. Beta Blockers
E. A, B, and C
F. All of the above
408
Orthopnea can be very suggestive of heart failure. Orthopnea is defined as:
A. Sudden onset of shortness of breath that wakes the patient from sleep.
B. Shortness of breath that occurs in a recumbent position.
C. Shortness of breath that occurs upon standing.
D. Shortness of breath that occurs with ambulation.
409
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 198
All of the following describe orthopnea EXCEPT:
A. The patient sleeps in a recliner.
B. The patient uses two or more pillows to sleep at night.
C. The patient is able to fall asleep lying flat but wakes up suddenly short of breath after several hours of sleep.
D. The patient has a hospital bed and sleeps with the head elevated. 410
When assessing volume overload status in the heart failure patient, you know that a 1 kg (2.2 pounds)
weight gain is equal to:
A. 2200 ml of retained fluid.
B. 1500 ml of retained fluid
C. 1000ml of retained fluid
D. 500 ml of retained fluid
411
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 199
Your 82 year old patient with a history of heart failure tells you that he is experiencing shortness of breath with his morning routine and finding it harder and harder to get dressed in the morning due to the dyspnea and fatigue. He reports he is fine when sitting in the chair
but walking across the room is becoming difficult due to the shortness of breath. This patients New York Heart Association
(NYHA) Functional Class would be:
A. NYHA Class I
B. NYHA Class II
C. NYHA Class III
D. NYHA Class IV
412
59 year old with heart failure has received diuresis while in the hospital. He is ready to be discharged. When you walked with him in
the hallway after breakfast he tells you that his breathing is much better. He was able to get washed up without difficulty. He thinks he is much better then when had came in and could hardly breath just sitting in a chair. His New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional
Class today would be:
A. NYHA Class I
B. NYHA Class II
C. NYHA Class III
D. NYHA Class IV
413
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 200
Signs and symptoms of abdominal edema and possible liver engorgement in the heart failure
patient include all of the following EXCEPT:
A. Early satiety
B. Abdominal bloating
C. Diarrhea
D. Nausea / Vomiting
414
The ACC (American College of Cardiology) and AHA (American Heart Association) guidelines for heart failure stage heart failure from stage A through D. Your patient has been admitted with heart failure. This
is a new diagnosis for the patient who has been identified a heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Which ACC / AHA Stage of HF
would be the correct stage for this patient.
A. Stage A
B. Stage B
C. Stage C
D. Stage D
415
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 201
When educating patients with heart failure about weighing themselves daily the best explanation as to why
the patient should participate in this activity would be:
A. Weighing yourself daily is a good practice of general health.
B. It is important that you eat well and maintain healthy nutrition. By monitoring your weight we can assure you are eating properly.
C. Monitoring your weight daily can identify timely changes in your weight. These weight changes alert us to possible changes in your fluid levels that may need to be addressed.
D. An increase in your weight can alert us that you are eating too much. Rapid weight changes can put more stress on your heart.
416
When a patient is identified as non-adherent to treatment the first thing the provider should do
is : A. Talk with the patient and try
to understand what the barriers are that keep the patient from participating in that aspect of care.
B. Explain to the patient why the therapy is important.
C. Be firm with the patient and tell the patient that if they do not comply they will need to find a new provider.
D. Talk to the spouse or significant other privately to identify a plan to coerce the patient into complying with the therapy. 417
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 202
Which of the following statements might make you think your heart failure patient may be moving from
the Palliative level of care to the Hospice level of care?
A. Since I was diagnosed with heart failure I knew it would kill me one day. I'm not sure what day that will be, but I'm not ready for it to be today.
B. I'll go back to the hospital but I'm staying there until they get it right this time.
C. I'm tired of going back to the hospital. Isn't there a way to treat this without repeated trips to the hospital?
D. I am not going back to the hospital. I don't want to do this anymore. I'm tired of fighting this battle. 418
Which of the following is NOT a sign of advancing heart failure?
A. Persistent hypotension
B. Persistent atrial fibrillation with high heart rates.
C. Multiple hospital admissions for heart failure
D. Worsening renal function
419
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 203
You are caring for a patient whose creatinine today is 1.7 mg/dL. Yesterday the creatinine was 1.01 mg/dL. Blood pressure is 126/80 mmHg and HR is 74. What
ordered medications should be held and clarified with the provider:
A. Metoprolol succinate
B. Amiodarone
C. Lisinopril
D. Warfarin
420
Thought They may forget your
name, but they will never
forget how you made
them feel.
-Maya Angelou 421
CNEA / Key Choice
2017
Cardionursing.com 204
Our Vision:
Practice with Joy. Positively impact every patient and family on their journey; provide safe passage; meet them where they are; connect with them in a meaningful way; and delivering care with wisdom and intention.
- Cindy and Karen
422 2017
423
BE THE BEST THAT YOU CAN BE
EVERY DAY. YOUR PATIENTS ARE
COUNTING ON IT!
Contact us: www.cardionursing.com