imaging of trauma in pregnant patient
DESCRIPTION
trauma in pregnant patientTRANSCRIPT
IMAGING OF TRAUMA IN PREGNANT PATIENT
Trauma: is the leading cause of non-obstetrical maternal mortality incidence: 5% to 7% of all pregnancies causes of trauma:motor vehicle collision other causes:FallsAssaultsBurns
Introduction
Major Trauma (life threatening trauma) fetal loss 40% to 50% Minor Trauma fetal loss 1% to 5% However Minor trauma is much more common Net Result: fetal losses occur more in minor trauma
Trauma
∗ Emergency: follow ATLS guide lines∗ Standard resuscitation techniques∗ To avoid Hypotension: Ensure left lateral 30 degree
decubitus position (>20 weeks pregnant)∗ After patient stabilization carry out USG to assess: . fetal well being and . gestational age
INITIAL Management
Following imaging modalities are used for evaluation:∗USG∗Conventional radiography ∗CT scan∗MRI scan
Imaging Evaluation
Most frequently used modality For initial evaluation of fetus: Abdomen US . Fetal wellbeing . gestational age For maternal evaluation: FAST SCANS . Free fluid in pericardial cavity . Free fluid in peritoneal cavity
USG EXAMINATION
∗ Sensitivity and specificity:- . Sensitivity: 61% to 83% . Specificity: 94% to 100%∗ Benefits:- .affordable . Easily available . No hazards of radiations
∗ Drawbacks:- . Free intra peritoneal fluid (< 400ml) is much more
difficult to detect . Cannot accurately detect solid and hollow organ
injuries . Requires excellent sonographer skills
CT is exceptionally best in hollow and solid organ injuries
How ever:deals with ionizing radiation
Conventional radiography and Computerized tomography(CT)
∗Radiation-induced Teratogenesis∗Radiation-induced Carcinogenesis
What’s the Big Deal?
Fetal radiation dose
Threshold value 50 mGy Natural background radiation 0.5 to 1.0mGy Abdominal CT with fetus in full view 25 mGy Other CT examinations in which fetus is not
in full view the radiation dose is very well below the threshold value
Estimated Fetal Dose
GESTATIONAL PERIOD EFFECTS THRESHOLD DOSE
< 2 WEEKS Failure of blastocyst implantation
50-100mGy
2-20 weeks teratogenesis 50 and 150mGy
Any time during pregnancy
carcinogenesis
Radiation-induced EFFECTS
Keeping in view the above hazards: decrease the dose of CT to the lowest possible multi phase study should be avoided until and unless necessary
FDA category B drug IV iodine contrast should be preferred if necessaryCan give better view of maternal and fetal injuries by
providing vascular contrast in organs and opacification of vascular structures
CT contrast: Iodine
∗ Typically not used as initial evaluation∗ however after initial evaluation it is an excellent choice
in: . Spinal injuries . Complex neurological and soft tissue injuries∗ can be used in follow up imaging
MRI
∗ No harmful effects on fetus are reported but some concerns are
. Potential effect of energy deposition . Resultant tissue heating in fetus . And potential effect of acoustic noise ∗ Gadolinium contrast is FDA category c drug and it
should be avoided until and unless absolutely necessary
Non pregnancy related injuries
Head injuries: Major cause of Maternal deaths
Spinal injuries
Thoracic injuries
a) Splenic injury b) liver injury
Abdominal injuries
Bladder injury
Pelvic injuries
Pregnancy specific injuries
∗ most common cause of fetal death in trauma cases where mother survives
∗ fetal mortality ranges from 67% to 75%Complications: . preterm delivery . Low birth weight Types: marginal and central
Placental Abruption
Not a sensitive tool for diagnosis∗ false negative values reported upto 50% to 80%∗ signs at USG . Marginal . Retro placental hemorrhage: >depends . Fresh hemorrhage :- hyperechoic to isoechoic . Old hemorrhage:- if > 2 weeks it will become sonolucent . Retro placental clot
Diagnosis: Ultrasonography
∗ first trimester: indistinguishable∗ second trimester: hyperattenuated relative to
adjacent myometrium∗ third trimester: increase heterogeneity and venous
lakes begins to appear on maternal side
Normal Placenta: CT SCAN
Normal Placenta: CT SCAN
CT findings of normal placenta at 40 weeks of gestation
∗ retro placental full thickness area of decrease enhancement
∗ retro placental hematoma∗ high attenuation blood products
Diagnostic findings of placental abruption on CT
CT findings: Placental abruption
CT findings of placental abruption in different patients
Findings of MR imaging in placental abruption
MR imaging for placental abruption
∗ incidence: 1%∗ fetal mortality: 100%∗ maternal mortality: 10%∗ diagnosis: CT scan is used as main diagnostic tools
Uterine rupture and penetrating injury
∗ full thickness defect in uterine wall∗ fetal parts present outside uterine cavity∗ haemoperitonium
Diagnostic findings on CT scan
Uterine rupture in 28 week pregnant women
Uterine laceration from penetrating trauma
Pre mature Rupture Of Membranes
Incomplete Spontaneous Abortion
Ectopic Pregnancy And Trauma
Fig: ruptured ectopic pregnancy
A negative examination can play vital role in directing appropriate non-surgical management of a pregnant trauma patient. Particularly true for women with penetrating injuries where CT may demonstrate only superficial injuries and an absence of deeper injury that would require surgery.
Value of negative imaging examination
Value of negative imaging examination
From an imaging standpoint, the workup of pregnant trauma patient should, proceed as for any patient, using conventional radiography, CT and MRI as needed. while using modalities with ionizing radiation, the dose should be kept as low as possible bearing in mind that all diagnostic imaging is less than 50 mGy.
The images should be interpreted accurately and a precise description should be given which will best guide the clinical management.
Conclusion