impact of alcohol taxes and border trade on alcohol ...¤kela_tallinna2018c...travellers’ alcohol...
TRANSCRIPT
13.11.2018 1
Impact of alcohol taxes and border trade on alcohol consumption:
the Finnish experience
Pia Mäkelä
Research professor
Pia Mäkelä
Why are we interested in alcohol?
13.11.2018 Pia Mäkelä 2
Globally, in 2016,
- 99 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were attributable to alcohol (4·2% of all DALYs)
- alcohol use was the seventh leading risk factor for both deaths and DALYs in 2016.
- among the population aged 15–49 years, alcohol use was the leading risk factor.
Source: GBD 2016 Alcohol and Drug Use Collaborators, Lancet 2018
13.11.2018 Pia Mäkelä 3
2010 WHO member states: the global strategy to reduce
the harmful use of alcohol
WHO “best buys” to reduce
non-communicable diseases included
three recommendations on alcohol:
• Increase excise taxes on alcoholic beverages
• Bans or comprehensive restrictions on
alcohol advertising
• Restrictions on the physical availability
of retailed alcohol
Alcohol policy recommendations by WHO
13.11.2018 Pia Mäkelä 4
OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
• OECD 2015 recommendations:
- Brief interventions in health care
- Raising alcohol prices, especially the cheaper segment
- Regulating the promotion of alcoholic beverages
13.11.2018 Pia Mäkelä 5
What does research say about impacts of prices?
Wagenaar et al. 2009 / systematic review and meta-analysis:
- 112 studies, 1003 estimates about the connection betweenalcohol price OR tax and alcohol consumption
- The price elasticity estimates (how much consumptionchanges when price / tax changes by 1%?):
- Beer: -0.46
- Wine: -0.69
- Spirits: -0.8
- Alcohol in general: -0.51
A second meta-analysis of Wagenaar et al. (2010) confirmed thatalcohol prices / taxes have an impact on alcohol-related mortalityand other harm from drinking
13.11.2018 Pia Mäkelä 6
A complication to using taxes as a means to reduce harm: travellers’ imports
• Normally it is assumed that if taxes are raised, the priceincreases, which reduces consumption and harms.
• When cheaper alcohol can be brought from elsewhere, the equation gets more complicated
– However, also the price of gas or bus/train/boat ticket, as well as time used for the travel are a part of the effective price
• i.e., even when borders ”leak”, it is likely that a tax increase willincrease the effective price of alcohol, though to a smaller extent thanif borders were closed.
13.11.2018 Pia Mäkelä 7
Hotspots in travellers’ alcohol imports in Europe
13.11.2018 8Travellers imports in Europe / Thomas Karlsson
The case of Finland in 2004
• Quotas for tarvellers’ imports ended in January
-> unlimited imports for personal use from other EU-countries
• Estonia joined the EU in May
-> Finland suddenly had a close-by southern neighbour with clearly cheaper alcohol
• Finland tried to combat travellers’ imports by cutting alcoholexcise duties by 33% on average (in March)
• Sweden faced similar situation with travellers’ imports fromDenmark but did not cut taxes
13.11.2018 Pia Mäkelä 9
Per capita alcohol consumption and alcohol-related mortality among the working-aged
13.11.2018 Pia Mäkelä 10
2004 tax cut &
Estonia into EU
Per capita alcohol consumption and alcohol-related mortality among the working-aged
13.11.2018 Pia Mäkelä 11
2004 tax cut &
Estonia into EU
5 tax increases
+ economic
downturn
Per capita alcohol consumption and alcohol-related mortality among the working-aged
13.11.2018 Pia Mäkelä 12
2004 tax cut &
Estonia into EU
5 tax increases
+ economic
downturn
Experience from Sweden
• Alcohol imports made a large proportion of alcoholconsumption in Southern Sweden
• However, per capita consumption did not increase, nor didmortality
• The general conclusion in these two countries has been thatSweden’s approach (not to lower alcohol taxes) resulted in a better outcome in those circumstances
13.11.2018 Pia Mäkelä 13
Travellers’ alcohol imports to Finland and taxes: the alcohol industry’s point of view
13.11.2018 Pia Mäkelä 14
Alcohol tax increases
In 2008, 2009 x 2, 2012 & 2014
Litres of beverage dominated by beer
Travellers’ imports, litres
Travellers’ alcohol imports to Finland and taxes– in perspective
13.11.2018 Pia Mäkelä 15
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
199
5
199
6
199
7
199
8
199
9
200
0
200
1
200
2
20
03
200
4
200
5
200
6
200
7
200
8
200
9
201
0
201
1
201
2
20
13
201
4
201
5
201
6
litres 100 % alcohol (+15 v) billion euro
1,8 litres
10,8 litresTotal alcohol consumption,
litres (+15 yrs)
Travellers alcohol imports,
litres 100% alc. (+ 15 yrs)
Alcohol tax revenue, billion €
Recent changes in Finnish alcohol policy
• A new Alcohol Act came into force 1.1.2018
– Only decided upon just before the Christmas break
– Main changes about sales in grocery stores:
• max alcohol limit 4.7% -> 5.5%
• Pre-mixed, spirits-based drinks / ”long drinks” allowed
– Other changes: less red tape for restaurants, lengthened bars’ opening hours etc. (1.3.2018 ->)
– Other smaller changes
13.11.2018 Pia Mäkelä 16
What else impacted consumption in 2018?
13.11.2018 Pia Mäkelä 17
- In 2007–2017 a constantdecreasing trend, altogether-18% (due at least to 5 alcohol
tax increases & poor economicdevelopment)
- In 2018: alcohol tax increaseby 10% (decreasesconsumption)
On the other hand:
- Exceptional heat wave
(increases consumption)
Zero change
(blue line)
does not equal
zero impact
Observed
consumption
Trend 07-17
Trend continues
Zero cha nge
What have we observed so far?
Observed I-VIII/2018 vs. I-VIII/2017:
- Registered sales: +1%
- Beer: a slight movement towards stronger beer (not as much as THL predicted)
- Retail sales of all types of Long drinks combined: +48%
If change will turn out to be less than expected: did prices change as expected (-40%) by both public health and alcohol industry?
13.11.2018 Meidän, teidän vai kaikkien haitat? Pia Mäkelä 18
Alcohol price index in Alko stores and in grocery stores for ”strong” alcoholic beverages (4,7-5,5%)
Index, December 2017 Alko prices=100
Long drink Alko
Long drink, stores
Lager Alko
Lager, stores
Source: consumer price index, Statistics Finland
13.11.2018 Alkoholinkäyttö ja haitat / Thomas Karlsson 20
When should the impact be visible? Compare: introduction of ciderto stores in 1995
Short-term impacts are better assessed for the whole of 2018.
Better estimate of impacts after 2-3 years.
Time series analysis should be used to tease out the impact of the Law from impacts of economy, tax, heat wave, pre-existingtrend etc.
13.11.2018 Pia Mäkelä 21