impact of cblo

Upload: abhisheksekhri9

Post on 10-Oct-2015

14 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

CBLO Impact

TRANSCRIPT

  • CBLO and its impact on other Money Market Segments

    Golaka C Nath & R Natarajan*

    Abstract

    Collateralized Borrowing and Lending Obligations, more popularly known as CBLO, hasbeen taking the center stage in financial markets in recent months. CBLO has been ainnovative product that provides tremendous flexibility to the user which a Repo does notprovide. During the initial period of its launching, the volume in CBLO market wasnegligible as it was a new product. Any new product takes time to integrate withcomparable products in the market. However as the time progressed, market participantsrealized the utility of the product and the restrictions imposed in call market for non-bankparticipants helped this market to grow. The CBLO, an infant in the financial world,stands on its own in this market, and the statistics display a calibrated integration ofCBLO market with other markets due to its advantages like CRR exemption, SLR statusfor the securities remaining unencumbered in the gilt accounts of the bank maintainedwith the CCIL under the Constituents' Subsidiary General Ledger (CSGL) facility, lowerrisk weight etc.

    The statistical results presented in the paper have shown that introduction of CBLO is asignificant event in Indian financial market and it has a clear relationship with otherforms of the short term market. It has absorbed the liquidity mismatch arisen out of callmarket restrictions imposed by RBI.

    * Shri Nath is Advisor, Eco. Research & Surveillance Dept. CCIL and Shri Natarajan is Manager, CBLOSettlement, CCIL, Mumbai.

  • 22

    Introduction:

    Collateralized Borrowing and Lending Obligations, more popularly known as CBLO, has

    been taking the center stage in financial markets in recent months. The innovative

    product developed by CCIL facilitates anonymous order matching system for efficient

    price discovery. It has taken a huge leap forward since its launch on Jan 20, 2003. Initial

    low volumes in the segment is a thing of the past and now it clocks about Rs.30000

    million per day with record volume of Rs.45470 million on September 14, 2004. The

    product is revolutionary in nature as it provided much needed flexibility to trade in a

    Repo type of contract with guaranteed settlement. CBLOs have been designed not only to

    provide an additional short term market for liquidity but also to provide an alternative to

    market participants who have been moving out of call market due to restrictions by RBI.

    There are 70 entities that include banks, primary dealers, mutual funds, insurance

    companies, financial institutions and co-operative banks that have been regularly trading

    in the product. CBLO is also likely to take care of the needs of corporates in managing

    their short term liquidity.

    CBLO has been attracting market participants in recent months as restrictions have been

    progressively introduced in the overnight call market. Effective from June 26, 2004, the

    exposure to call market by non-bank entities has been pared down to 45% of their

    average call market lending in the year 2000-01. Prudential limits were imposed on

    borrowing/lending by banks and primary dealers in the call money market. With the RBI

    moving closer to its ultimate goal of making the call market a pure inter bank market with

    only exception being PDs, it would be imperative for market participants to move to

    other alternative markets for managing their short term liquidity. The aftermath of call

    market restrictions is also prominent in Repo market wherein the average daily volume

    has surged from Rs.28000millions to Rs.48000millions during this period. However, the

    CBLO, as a product has an edge over the Repo as it overcomes the restrictions in the

    traditional Repo. Unlike the Repo, the CBLO allows an exit route for the borrowers and

    lenders during the contract period.

  • 33

    The present article tries to study the impact of CBLO market on other comparable

    markets like call market and Repo markets. Chart-1 gives the business growth of CBLO

    segment of CCIL since its inception.

    Business Grow th in CBLO segment (January 03 to July 04)

    0.00

    2000.00

    4000.00

    6000.00

    8000.00

    10000.00

    12000.00

    14000.00

    16000.00

    24-0

    1-03

    24-0

    2-03

    24-0

    3-03

    24-0

    4-03

    24-0

    5-03

    24-0

    6-03

    24-0

    7-03

    24-0

    8-03

    24-0

    9-03

    24-1

    0-03

    24-1

    1-03

    24-1

    2-03

    24-0

    1-04

    24-0

    2-04

    24-0

    3-04

    24-0

    4-04

    24-0

    5-04

    24-0

    6-04

    24-0

    7-04

    CBLO

    Data

    The study covers the period from January 20, 2003 to July 31, 2004. For the period, we

    have used the weekly volume data (Saturday to Friday) for CBLO, Call, Repo and LAF

    markets. During the period, the LAF was modified by RBI (first 1-day Repo to 7-day and

    14-day Repo in April 04 and reintroducing 1-day Repo). We have seen significant

    increase in LAF window and on a daily basis about Rs.400000millions are deposited by

    banks with RBI earning the guaranteed Repo rate on such deposits. Chart-2 gives the

    volumes movement of various market segments during the period of our study.

    Chart-2 Weekly Cumulative Volume

  • 44

    Weekly Cummulative Volume (January 03 to July 04)

    0.0050000.00

    100000.00150000.00200000.00250000.00300000.00350000.00400000.00450000.00500000.00

    24-01

    -03

    24-02

    -03

    24-03

    -03

    24-04

    -03

    24-05

    -03

    24-06

    -03

    24-07

    -03

    24-08

    -03

    24-09

    -03

    24-10

    -03

    24-11

    -03

    24-12

    -03

    24-01

    -04

    24-02

    -04

    24-03

    -04

    24-04

    -04

    24-05

    -04

    24-06

    -04

    24-07

    -04

    Date

    Rs.

    in C

    rore

    sLAF

    Call

    Repo

    CBLO

    It is observed from the graph that call market weekly volume which remained over

    Rs.600,000million till October 2003 has started tapering down slowly while CBLO and

    Repo volumes have increased. Repo volumes have been surging steadily throughout the

    study period indicating that a sizeable share of the reduction in call volume has spilled

    over to Repo market. The CBLO market has witnessed heightened activity from January

    2004 after the non-bank entities, especially the mutual funds, joined the segment. As

    shown in the Chart-3, the CBLO market has achieved about 40% to 50% of the Repo

    volumes in recent months, and the share is expected to increase with the participation of

    all the market participants.

    Chart-3 CBLO Repo Volume and Spread

  • 55

    CBLO_Repo Volume_Spread

    0

    5,000

    10,000

    15,000

    20,000

    25,000

    30,000

    35,000

    40,000

    Jan-0

    3

    Feb-0

    3

    Mar-0

    3

    Apr-0

    3

    May-0

    3

    Jun-0

    3Ju

    l-03

    Aug-0

    3

    Sep-0

    3Oc

    t-03

    Nov-0

    3

    Dec-0

    3

    Jan-0

    4

    Feb-0

    4

    Mar-0

    4

    Apr-0

    4

    May-0

    4

    Jun-0

    4Ju

    l-04

    Month

    Volu

    me

    (Rs.

    in C

    rore

    s)

    -1.50

    -1.00

    -0.50

    0.00

    0.50

    1.00

    1.50

    2.00

    Spre

    ad (%

    )

    CBLOREPOSpread

    Chart-3 indicates the spread between CBLO and Repo rates during the initial months of

    CBLO launching was above the neutral level but has been hovering around the zero level

    in recent months. Logically the spread should be close to zero as both the market are

    collateralized though CBLO provides more flexibility and hence rates in CBLO segment

    should be lower than that of the Repo market. However, from January 2004, the spread

    between the two markets has narrowed down signifying the fast integration of CBLO

    market with other money market instruments.

    It is observed from Chart-2 that RBI s Liquidity Adjustment Facility (LAF) which

    peaked during the last week of July 2003 declined gradually till November 2003 and

    thereafter reversed the position in a big way touching Rs.4,500,000 million during June

    2004. The extension of tenor of the LAF to seven days from March 29, 2004 has not

    deterred participants from parking funds in the window. LAF insulates the banks against

    any southward interest rate risk when liquidity is high in the system thereby preventing

    effective price discovery in the market and also shuts the door for the emergence short

    term yield curve.

  • 66

    Methodology

    The aim of the present paper is to study the impact of CBLO on other segments like Call,

    Repo and LAF. The paper tries to find the relationship among various segments of the

    market in terms of their trading volumes. We have used the weekly trading volumes as

    well as their weekly changes to understand the relationship.

    We have used all the log values of 4 variables as dependent as well as independent

    variables to run the regressions. We have used the following equations to run the

    regression analysis:

    ebbba ++++= 332211 *** XXXY

    where Y can be log values of either CBLO or LAF or REPO or CALL weekly volumes

    and depending on the sequence X1, X2 and X3 would be LAF, REPO, CALL or CBLO

    respectively.

    We have made an event study to see if the introduction of this new product has any

    impact in the overnight call or not. For this we have used a dummy variable that would

    take the value of 1 after the introduction of CBLO and 0 before its introduction. For

    this we have used the following equation where Call Volumes of week t is a function of

    Call volumes of week t-1:

    egba +++= - ttt DUMMYCallCall ** )1(

    Results

    We have studied the correlation of the segments and find that the correlations of these

    market segments are significant at 1% level indicating strong relationship among these

    markets. However, we have found that LAF is negatively correlated with Call, Call is

    negatively correlated with all three segments and Repo is negatively correlated with Call

    while CBLO is negatively correlated with Call. Table-1 gives the correlation results:

  • 77

    Table-1: Correlation of LAF, Call, Repo & CBLO Segments LAF Call Repo CBLO

    LAF 1.00000 -0.50923 0.43622 0.70022 (

  • 88

    Now we move to study the robustness of the relationships using the regression analysis.

    i. Effect of LAF on others: We found that weekly LAF volume has a negative

    relationship with weekly call and Repo and positive relationship with CBLO

    volumes through we find the p-values for CBLO and Repo being significant at

    1% level of significance.

    ii. Effect of Call on others: We found that weekly call volumes have a negative

    relationship with LAF and CBLO while it has a positive relationship with

    Repo though relationship is not found to be significant with LAF and Repo at

    conventional levels. The relationship with CBLO was found to be significant

    at 1% level.

    iii. Effect of Repo on others: We found that weekly Repo volumes have a

    negative relationship with LAF but positive relationship with Call and CBLO

    though the relationship was found to be significant with CBLO and LAF at

    1% level.

    iv. Effect of CBLO on others: We found that CBLO has a negative relationship

    with Call while maintaining a positive relationship with Repo and LAF. We

    found the relationship of CBLO with all three market segments to be

    significant at 1% level. For robustness check, we took the weekly changes in

    all volumes of all four segments and run the regression. We find that changes

    in CBLO weekly volumes has a significant relationship with changes in

    weekly Call market volumes at 1% level.Table-3: Regression Results

    Variable: LAFIndependent Variables Coefficients t Stat P-value

    Call -0.01268 -0.04 0.9665Repo -0.70581 -2.96 0.0041

    CBLO 0.58194 6.36 0.0001Variable: Call

    LAF -0.00184 -0.04 0.9665Repo 0.09949 1.05 0.2990

    CBLO -0.16742 -4.34 0.0001Variable: Repo

    Call 0.14256 1.05 0.2990LAF -0.14659 -2.96 0.0041

    CBLO 0.34091 10.13 0.0001Variable: CBLO

    Call -1.18554 -4.34 0.0001Repo 1.68467 10.13 0.0001LAF 0.59727 6.36 0.0001

  • 99

    It is observed from the above results that trading volume in the call market has inverse

    relationship with CBLO volumes as indicated by the negative co-efficient and

    significance levels. The results point out the fact the call market restrictions have resulted

    in moving business from call to other markets like CBLO and Repo. It also points out the

    fact that the liquidity generated in the system by the call market restrictions and also by

    the fresh inflows in the system has contributed to the development of all these markets.

    Money Market Rate Movements

    Market efficiency tells us that interest rate in related markets must be very close to each

    other. However, LAF rate is a rigid rate at 4.5% while other market rates like Repo, Call

    and CBLO depend on demand and supply conditions and the market participants

    arbitrage capabilities. To understand the linkage dynamics of Call, Repo and CBLO rates,

    we have taken all deals of respective markets for the month of August 2004 (25 days) and

    arrived at their weighted average rates. The data reveals very high and significant

    correlation between all three rates indicating high level of convergence. The average call

    market rate has been found to be higher than Repo and CBLO indicating risk premium

    for uncollateralized market. Table-4 gives us the summary statistics and Table 5 gives the

    correlation of the above 3 market interest rates:

    Table-4: Summary Statistics of Repo, Call & CBLO Rates

    Variables N Mean Std. Dev Minimum MaximumRepo Rate 25 4.16019 0.25623 3.76058 4.88179Call Rate 25 4.32555 0.20116 3.95343 4.99758CBLO Rate 25 4.18352 0.33353 3.36000 4.94000

    Table-5: Correlation of Repo, Call and CBLO Rates

    Repo Rate Call Rate CBLO Rate

    Repo Rate 1.00000 0.87419 0.91313 (

  • 10

    10

    The Chart-4 gives the movement of all 3 rates during August 2004. As can be seen from

    the chart, all rates have moved in tandem though most of the time, CBLO has a tendency

    to reach lower levels vis--vis Repo or Call rates.

    Chart-4: Money Market Rates Movement (August 2004)

    Money Market Rates Movement (August 2004)

    3.00

    3.50

    4.00

    4.50

    5.00

    02-0

    8-04

    04-0

    8-04

    06-0

    8-04

    08-0

    8-04

    10-0

    8-04

    12-0

    8-04

    14-0

    8-04

    16-0

    8-04

    18-0

    8-04

    20-0

    8-04

    22-0

    8-04

    24-0

    8-04

    26-0

    8-04

    28-0

    8-04

    30-0

    8-04

    Date

    Rat

    e (%

    )

    RepoRATE CallRATE CBLORATE

    Conclusions:

    CBLO has been a innovative product that provides tremendous flexibility to the user

    which a Repo does not provide. During the initial period of its launching, the volume in

    CBLO market was negligible as it was a new product. Any new product takes time to

    integrate with comparable products in the market. However as the time progressed,

    market participants realized the utility of the product and the restrictions imposed in call

    market for non-bank participants helped this market to grow. The CBLO segment has

    reached a trading volume of Rs.45470millions on September 14, 2004 indicating its

    utility to market participants. Today it has fully integrated to the short term market

    structure. The CBLO, an infant in the financial world, stands on its own in this market,

    and the statistics display a calibrated integration of CBLO market with other markets due

    to its advantages like CRR exemption, SLR status for the securities remaining

    unencumbered in the gilt accounts of the bank maintained with the CCIL under the

  • 11

    11

    Constituents' Subsidiary General Ledger (CSGL) facility, lower risk weight etc. The

    wider usage of the instrument is expected to receive impetus from the establishment of

    real time connectivity between the Public Debt Office (PDO) of the Reserve Bank and

    CCIL and value-free transfer of securities between market participants and CCIL. RBI, in

    its Credit Policy, has announced automatic value free transfer of securities through NDS

    for the CBLO Segment.

    The statistical results presented in the paper have shown that introduction of CBLO is a

    significant event in Indian financial market and it has a clear relationship with other

    forms of the short term market. It has absorbed the liquidity mismatch arisen out of call

    market restrictions imposed by RBI.

    Data Source: CCIL, RBI publications

  • 12

    12

    Annexure-1: Overnight Call market Weekly Volumes

    DateCall Volume (Rs. incrores Date

    Call Volume (Rs. incrores

    04-Jan-02 66738.245 17-Apr-03 18192.2211-Jan-02 85212.9 25-Apr-03 55619.1518-Jan-02 108993.83 02-May-03 33550.9625-Jan-02 95522.435 09-May-03 63842.4601-Feb-02 199394.69 14-May-03 39963.3608-Feb-02 106853.33 23-May-03 61481.8015-Feb-02 108389.065 30-May-03 63814.9922-Feb-02 97592.855 06-Jun-03 72403.1301-Mar-02 184080.53 13-Jun-03 76279.3808-Mar-02 102591.745 20-Jun-03 75700.9115-Mar-02 79612.74 27-Jun-03 57207.1122-Mar-02 109391.045 04-Jul-03 55771.8728-Mar-02 92085.285 11-Jul-03 54457.2405-Apr-02 105092.765 18-Jul-03 57133.6912-Apr-02 133996.15 25-Jul-03 61263.1519-Apr-02 227509.71 01-Aug-03 52176.7526-Apr-02 107718.055 08-Aug-03 51790.51

    03-May-02 97121.155 14-Aug-03 54706.7510-May-02 142290.39 22-Aug-03 69813.5317-May-02 109063.835 29-Aug-03 74170.6324-May-02 120977.855 05-Sep-03 53685.3431-May-02 217979.89 12-Sep-03 70301.2007-Jun-02 101617.51 19-Sep-03 75999.9414-Jun-02 93729.905 26-Sep-03 76392.1921-Jun-02 94778.8 03-Oct-03 45745.7328-Jun-02 80907.16 10-Oct-03 71456.3005-Jul-02 189131.42 17-Oct-03 71257.6912-Jul-02 97394.59 24-Oct-03 72304.8819-Jul-02 107308.125 31-Oct-03 55126.0726-Jul-02 100954.57 07-Nov-03 57845.61

    02-Aug-02 84045.37 14-Nov-03 49432.4609-Aug-02 109374.505 21-Nov-03 46665.3216-Aug-02 89783.095 28-Nov-03 30412.7123-Aug-02 96566.555 05-Dec-03 41668.1930-Aug-02 109596.3 12-Dec-03 47913.9806-Sep-02 97301.295 19-Dec-03 50799.2513-Sep-02 86393.935 26-Dec-03 39870.2720-Sep-02 104999.845 02-Jan-04 51507.1927-Sep-02 89885.06 09-Jan-04 51856.0504-Oct-02 59358.005 16-Jan-04 47855.9311-Oct-02 106281.52 23-Jan-04 49856.3218-Oct-02 76800.16 30-Jan-04 33599.4225-Oct-02 95921.33 06-Feb-04 32272.5801-Nov-02 99311.2 13-Feb-04 32738.5708-Nov-02 93843.755 20-Feb-04 25871.3715-Nov-02 92609.115 27-Feb-04 29161.90

  • 13

    13

    22-Nov-02 65531.83 05-Mar-04 26706.0229-Nov-02 64981.915 12-Mar-04 32977.6106-Dec-02 65745.74 19-Mar-04 44818.0513-Dec-02 135120.625 26-Mar-04 44483.4220-Dec-02 87634.055 02-Apr-04 15019.6327-Dec-02 62449.745 08-Apr-04 23838.1403-Jan-03 82397.355 16-Apr-04 26846.7210-Jan-03 77374.88 23-Apr-04 31605.0617-Jan-03 78188.755 30-Apr-04 23692.9224-Jan-03 72200.05 07-May-04 25867.3431-Jan-03 70821.79 14-May-04 28788.5507-Feb-03 69021.47 21-May-04 32453.2814-Feb-03 52435.21 28-May-04 27544.3121-Feb-03 67870.10 04-Jun-04 31064.7928-Feb-03 67566.64 11-Jun-04 23275.7607-Mar-03 70806.64 18-Jun-04 32517.6313-Mar-03 67318.35 25-Jun-04 37588.4321-Mar-03 67698.72 02-Jul-04 27266.9728-Mar-03 76404.70 09-Jul-04 33934.3804-Apr-03 50021.21 16-Jul-04 36812.9810-Apr-03 54849.79 23-Jul-04 31157.60

  • 14

    14

    Annexure - 2: Weekly Cumulative Volumes in LAF, CALL, REPO & CBLODate LAF Call Repo CBLO

    24-Jan-03 14660.00 72200.05 6532.26 35.0031-Jan-03 11740.00 70821.79 8881.38 32.5007-Feb-03 34045.00 69021.47 9483.71 96.0014-Feb-03 8044.00 52435.21 6561.33 107.0021-Feb-03 36470.00 67870.10 7290.78 56.0028-Feb-03 2670.00 67566.64 15106.21 72.0007-Mar-03 31030.00 70806.64 12361.65 61.5013-Mar-03 2810.00 67318.35 11885.06 165.0021-Mar-03 13360.00 67698.72 9317.89 76.5028-Mar-03 17203.22 76404.70 14060.71 110.7004-Apr-03 66605.00 50021.21 2337.04 77.5010-Apr-03 110994.00 54849.79 6592.40 98.0017-Apr-03 43743.00 18192.22 3429.90 40.0025-Apr-03 175125.00 55619.15 8606.50 162.80

    02-May-03 124020.00 33550.96 6032.32 138.2509-May-03 138820.00 63842.46 7016.68 115.7014-May-03 50665.00 39963.36 3781.33 72.3023-May-03 129576.00 61481.80 3762.96 89.0030-May-03 172160.00 63814.99 6621.16 100.0006-Jun-03 152895.00 72403.13 7639.00 97.4513-Jun-03 97818.00 76279.38 7074.59 47.7020-Jun-03 118270.00 75700.91 6691.69 51.0027-Jun-03 150163.00 57207.11 8507.28 77.5004-Jul-03 149535.00 55771.87 7624.53 174.0011-Jul-03 224080.00 54457.24 12405.05 279.4018-Jul-03 216785.00 57133.69 10068.89 266.0025-Jul-03 222005.00 61263.15 8462.08 204.20

    01-Aug-03 238900.00 52176.75 5280.41 251.0008-Aug-03 248735.00 51790.51 9592.22 460.7014-Aug-03 158200.00 54706.75 8918.13 463.4022-Aug-03 184640.00 69813.53 8784.50 240.2529-Aug-03 163130.00 74170.63 11363.33 527.0005-Sep-03 210635.00 53685.34 12980.10 601.0012-Sep-03 164440.00 70301.20 9463.27 627.6519-Sep-03 167295.00 75999.94 8435.17 320.7526-Sep-03 105974.00 76392.19 12067.63 1000.2503-Oct-03 108790.00 45745.73 8685.03 117.0010-Oct-03 108815.00 71456.30 9559.44 328.0017-Oct-03 70270.00 71257.69 11613.90 355.7524-Oct-03 48406.00 72304.88 15856.62 359.2031-Oct-03 25800.00 55126.07 21438.96 210.6007-Nov-03 95305.00 57845.61 16576.16 701.5014-Nov-03 85805.00 49432.46 13324.04 637.6021-Nov-03 108445.00 46665.32 20252.62 193.2028-Nov-03 114920.00 30412.71 14447.17 211.20

  • 15

    15

    05-Dec-03 179965.00 41668.19 15466.27 920.0012-Dec-03 166565.00 47913.98 14021.17 879.9019-Dec-03 148205.00 50799.25 11762.44 439.2026-Dec-03 122960.00 39870.27 11069.13 593.3002-Jan-04 188575.00 51507.19 16346.17 363.7509-Jan-04 230680.00 51856.05 19128.53 1346.6516-Jan-04 184825.00 47855.93 16753.53 1330.6523-Jan-04 158645.00 49856.32 17752.83 2612.4530-Jan-04 154430.00 33599.42 12020.56 1613.2506-Feb-04 189520.00 32272.58 10632.49 3057.2513-Feb-04 217055.00 32738.57 15031.08 3900.2520-Feb-04 186475.00 25871.37 13836.00 3598.8527-Feb-04 240340.00 29161.90 11684.48 3816.2005-Mar-04 216790.00 26706.02 15119.06 4998.1512-Mar-04 283090.00 32977.61 14832.07 5754.8019-Mar-04 273775.00 44818.05 15472.45 5198.4526-Mar-04 293915.00 44483.42 17397.81 7115.2002-Apr-04 214815.00 15019.63 26383.97 3856.1008-Apr-04 266880.00 23838.14 33501.72 5569.4016-Apr-04 314775.00 26846.72 33156.79 4002.4023-Apr-04 407220.00 31605.06 38030.75 9077.6530-Apr-04 305825.00 23692.92 30562.85 7961.05

    07-May-04 315760.00 25867.34 27255.40 7665.8514-May-04 443880.00 28788.55 40361.99 11269.2021-May-04 439845.00 32453.28 31880.74 13163.3028-May-04 452540.00 27544.31 31487.30 11390.6004-Jun-04 411990.00 31064.79 31759.94 12026.8511-Jun-04 363565.00 23275.76 43691.51 11868.6018-Jun-04 361920.00 32517.63 35808.37 12000.6025-Jun-04 367875.00 37588.43 35663.69 13293.7002-Jul-04 382720.00 27266.97 15505.25 10347.4009-Jul-04 393355.00 33934.38 21991.00 12590.1016-Jul-04 350960.00 36812.98 27335.11 13754.4023-Jul-04 309725.00 31157.60 27186.60 13921.2530-Jul-04 356505.00 32333.73 28956.22 12861.95

    Note: all volumes in Rs. Crores