impact simulation on the real part of aircraft … · bird strike fe fe simulationsimulation the...
TRANSCRIPT
IMPACT SIMULATION ON THE REALIMPACT SIMULATION ON THE REALPART OF AIRCRAFT STRUCTURESPART OF AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES
Radek Doubrava VZLU a.s., Czech Republic
Description of problemDescription of problem
AimAim:: predictionprediction ofof thethe impactimpact behaviorbehavior ofof hardhard andand softsoftbodybody immediatelyimmediately afterafter thethe impactimpact toto partpart ofof aircraftaircraftstructuresstructures..
Projectile Projectile impactimpact•• MeasurementMeasurement
NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010
ConclusionsConclusions
Bird strikeBird strike
•• MeasurementMeasurement
•• FE simulation FE simulation
•• Comparison between measurement and FE simulation Comparison between measurement and FE simulation
•• MeasurementMeasurement
•• FE simulation FE simulation
•• Comparison between measurement and FE simulation Comparison between measurement and FE simulation
Description of problemDescription of problemIn the service of an aircraft has been possibility risk of emergency cases from point of In the service of an aircraft has been possibility risk of emergency cases from point of view unforeseeable circumstances (e.g. bird strike, sucked impurities to the engine view unforeseeable circumstances (e.g. bird strike, sucked impurities to the engine etc.), or owing to human factor (e.g. projectile, missiles etc).etc.), or owing to human factor (e.g. projectile, missiles etc).
NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Air_France_Flight_4590.jpghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Air_France_Flight_4590.jpghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird_strikehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird_strike
Aircraft surface scanningAircraft surface scanning
Projectile ImpactProjectile Impact
NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010
ATOS measurementATOS measurementResult of scanningResult of scanning
Comparison between real damage and nonComparison between real damage and non--damage (CAD) surfacedamage (CAD) surface
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Resi
dual
vel
ocit
y [m
/s]
FEA
Experimental [1]
material:E= 74000 MPan= 0,33r= 2,77E-09 t/mm3
A= 368,9 MPaB= 683,9 MPaC= 0,0083
m= 1,7n= 0,73
D1= 0,112D2= 0,123D3= 1,5D4= 0,007D5= 0
2024-T3
Elastic
Johnson-Cook constants
Johnson-Cook failure
Numerical simulationNumerical simulation
Model of real projectileModel of real projectileFE modelFE model
Projectile ImpactProjectile Impact
NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Impact velocity [m/s]
Results of FE simulationResults of FE simulation 505
510
515
520
525
530
535
540
545
550
0,0000 0,0002 0,0004 0,0006 0,0008 0,0010
Proj
ecti
le v
eloc
ity [m
/s]
Time [s]
Comparison between measurement and Comparison between measurement and FE FE simulationsimulation
MeasurementMeasurement
Projectile ImpactProjectile Impact
NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010
Leading edge resultsLeading edge results..Skin results between ribsSkin results between ribs..
FE simulationFE simulation
Diametr of muzzle [mm]
length of muzzle [m]
weight of birdvelocity of
bird [km/h]
125 25 2lb (0,91kg) 650125 25 4lb (1,81kg) 450
Bird strike Bird strike Test Method and FacilityTest Method and Facility
NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010
VELOCITY-PRESSURE
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
900
950
1000
0,15 0,2 0,25 0,3 0,35 0,4
PRESSURE [MPa]
VELO
CITY
[km
/h]
Bird strike Bird strike
FE FE simulationsimulation
The ABAQUS/Explicit has been used for impact simulation onto the part The ABAQUS/Explicit has been used for impact simulation onto the part of aircraft structureof aircraft structure
the bird for sharp parts such as the bird for sharp parts such as pitotpitot probe was modeled as a cylinder probe was modeled as a cylinder with refine mesh on the contact surface for point of view some numerical with refine mesh on the contact surface for point of view some numerical singularities elimination. For oblique parts has been used standard bird singularities elimination. For oblique parts has been used standard bird model (cylinder with spherical ends)model (cylinder with spherical ends)
NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010
In the simulation, the bird adopts an elasticIn the simulation, the bird adopts an elastic--plastic model with shear and plastic model with shear and tensile failuretensile failure
The bird nodes are charged with an initial velocityThe bird nodes are charged with an initial velocity
*TENSILE FAILURE*TENSILE FAILURE
*SHEAR FAILURE*SHEAR FAILURE
PitotPitot probeprobe
Bird strike Bird strike
NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010
BirdBird massmass ==2lb 2lb (0,91kg(0,91kg))VelocityVelocity = 180 m/s (648km/h)= 180 m/s (648km/h)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Bird
vel
ocit
y [k
m/h
]
no failure
fragmented
Windshield glass of civil aircraftWindshield glass of civil aircraft
Bird strike Bird strike
Bird mass =Bird mass = 4 lb (1,82 kg)4 lb (1,82 kg)
NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010
0
0 5 10 15 20 25Thickness of laminated glass [mm]
Bird mass =Bird mass = 4 lb (1,82 kg)4 lb (1,82 kg)Velocity = 300 Velocity = 300 -- 450 km/h450 km/h
Windshield glass of military aircraftWindshield glass of military aircraftBird strike Bird strike
NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010
BirdBird massmass ==4 4 lb (lb (1,82 1,82 kg)kg)VelocityVelocity = 300 = 300 -- 450 km/h450 km/h
Future worksFuture works
development of the development of the new new synthetic model of bird with inner skeleton stiffness synthetic model of bird with inner skeleton stiffness simulationsimulation
simulations will be increased simulations will be increased about CEL (Coupled about CEL (Coupled EulerianEulerian ––LagrangianLagrangian) technique) technique
NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010
improve boundary conditions (frame, gasket etc.)improve boundary conditions (frame, gasket etc.)
improve material propertiesimprove material properties
ConclusionConclusionss
diagnostics of airframe damage diagnostics of airframe damage -- scanning of aircraft surface, photogrammetric scanning of aircraft surface, photogrammetric system application etc.system application etc.
application for structure repair evaluation application for structure repair evaluation –– damage of inner structure, composite damage of inner structure, composite
TheThe resultresult showsshows goodgood agreementagreement betweenbetween measurementmeasurement andand FEFE calculationcalculation..AlthoughAlthough thisthis workwork isis onlyonly aa firstfirst approximation,approximation, andand implementedimplemented inin relativelyrelativelysimplifiedsimplified terms,terms, thisthis methodmethod ofof findingfinding damagedamage propagationpropagation isis applicableapplicable forfor::
NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010
application for structure repair evaluation application for structure repair evaluation –– damage of inner structure, composite damage of inner structure, composite path application etc.path application etc.
service operations service operations –– visual inspectionvisual inspection
performance of airworthiness from point of view bird strikeperformance of airworthiness from point of view bird strike
NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010NAFEMS NORDIC REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2010