implementation of an evidenced based nursing practice ......restraint and personal safety attendant...
TRANSCRIPT
Implementation of an Evidenced Based Nursing
Practice Guideline on Physical Restraints
Linda Stevens, MS, RN-BC, CPHQ
Clinical Nurse Specialist Quality and Safety
University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics
Objectives
Describe a process for implementing evidence based practice guideline on restraintsIdentify metrics for monitoring restraint utilization
UW HealthLocated in Madison, WisconsinAcademic medical center and health
system for the University of WisconsinIncludes:
UW Hospital536 licensed beds
American Family Children’s HospitalUW Paul P. Carbone Comprehensive
Cancer Center
University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics
UW Hospital and Clinics (FY10)
Licensed Beds 536 ICU Beds-Peds & Adult 83Inpatient admissions 25,901Emergency Dept Visits 42,534Clinic visits 577,729
Employees 7468
Awards and RecognitionJanuary 2010-HIMSS Analytics Stage 7 Award
May 2009-Magnet hospital designation by the American Nurses Credentialing Center
January 2009- Named #1 academic medical center nationwide for outstanding nursing quality by American Nurses
UWHC and NDNQI
Member of NDNQI since 2003UWHC has participated in RN Satisfaction Survey for 8 years (2003-2010)Published monograph in ANA’s publication “Transforming Nursing Data into Quality Care: Profiles of Quality Improvement in US Healthcare Facilities”Previous poster and podium presentations
Definition
Restraint is any manual method, physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a patient to move his/her arms, legs, body or head freely.
Restraint Program Goals for Fiscal Year 2010
Roll Out Restraint GuidelineImplement New Restraint PolicyChange Health Link build Reduce restraint daysIncrease restraint documentation compliance
Nursing Practice Guidelines at UWHC
Nursing Practice Guidelines Committee established in 2006– Subcommittee of Nursing Practice Council– Developed definition of terms– Developed development process– Developed implementation process– Endorse priority topics– Recommend guidelines to Nursing
Practice Council– 18 Nursing Practice Guidelines
Guideline ProcessPractice topics chosen (4-5/year)Lit review → evidence synthesized
Nursing Practice Guideline Committee reviews and makes recommendations
Practice Council approvesImplementation
Evaluation
Workgroup develops new guideline or adopts external guideline
Guidelines updated every 3 years
Development & Approval Flow Diagram
Development & Approval Flow Diagram
Development & Approval Flow Diagram
Development & Approval Flow Diagram
Restraint and Personal Safety Attendant
Patients with the Actual or Potential Need for Restraint or Personal Safety Attendant Nursing Practice GuidelineExternal Guideline Adopted– “Changing the Practice of Physical Restraint Use
in Acute Care” from the University of Iowa College of Nursing (Park, M., Tang, J. H., & Ledford, L., 2005)
– Critical Care Considerations Addendum– Pediatric Nursing Considerations– Personal Safety Attendant Tools
Nursing Restraint and Patient Safety Attendant (PSA) Guideline
Unknown benefits of restraints Use of physical restraints is associated with numerous risks– increase risk for falls with injury– death– increase confusion– adverse effects of immobilation– emotional distress– violation of patient rights– risk of being sued for poor standard of care
Nursing Restraint and Patient Safety Attendant (PSA) Guideline
The standard of care is not to use restraintsStrive to promote restraint-free care while maintaining patient safetyUse physical restraints only when positive, nonrestrictive procedures have failed to produce the desired behavioral change and remove them as soon as possible
Implementation Strategies
Taken from Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (2002). Toolkit: Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines. Toronto, Canada: Registered Nurses Association of Ontario.
Implementation PlanTypical four hour education– Offered three times – Videotaped session available on internet
Meet with unit leadership– Review guideline– Review data– Develop plan to become in line with
guideline– Develop short term and long term goals
with staff– Monitor progress with data
Restraint Guideline Roll OutEducation March 2010Began pilot roll out January 2010 with Trauma and Life Support Center (TLC)Met with Leadership & Unit Councils on:– Neurosurgery, Neuro ICU, General
Medicine & Geriatrics, Family Practice & Forensics
Developed content for guidance on less restrictive alternatives and least to most restrictive restraint types
Restraint Days
One Day Prevalence -– NDNQI– Includes limb and vest
Health Link Data– All documented restraints– All restraint types
Percent of patients in restraintsShare information via Focus on Quality Newsletter, Nursing Quality Council, Safety Resource Nurses
Percent of Patients with Physical Restraint
3.87% 4.15%
7.00%6.70%
5.10%
6.90%
7.90%
6.00%
4.60%
5.90%
4.80%4.30%
7.20%
5.10% 5.00%4.60%
5.60%
4.40% 4.70%5.40%
5.70%5.00%
2.20%
6.00%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
Overall Nursing-One Day Prevalence UCL LCL
Rest r ai nt Pr eval ence = Percent of pati ents wi th l imb or vest r est rai nt on day of pr evalence study. Rest rai nt pr evalence data based upon one-day pr eval ence study (conducted with pressur e ulcer audit ). Upper Contr ol Limi t (UCL) +2 Standar d devi at ions f rom meanLower Contr ol Limi t (LCL) -2 Standar d deviat ions f r om meanMean based upon 24 data points
Number of Restraint Types Documented in Health Link
197
219209
170
193
231
179
203
222233
248
196187
213 210193
176
196 190179
8 13 9 5 4 3 4 5 114 3 3 2 6 6 2 2 3 2 6
2035
4430 28 27 28 25
32 32 28 3244 42 40 33 28 23 25 22
6 4 5 4 5 3 6 2 1 5 5 2 6 3 4 7 2 3 2 30 0 016
7 916 10 15
5 11 11 7 135
13 10 10 12 1825 29
13 11 12 9 620 19
6 12 12 18 22 21 167 10 14 12
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Feb-09
Mar-09
Apr-09
May-09
Jun-09
Jul-09
Aug-09
Sep-09
Oct-09
Nov-09
Dec-09
Jan-10
Feb-10
Mar-10
Apr-10
May-10
Jun-10
Jul-10
Aug-10
Sep-10
Limb (R Wrist) Total
Lap Belt Total
Vest Total
Enclosure Bed Total
Mitts (R) Total
Elbow Immobilizer (R)TotalLinear (Limb (R Wrist)Total)
Number of Restraint Types Documented in Health Link
20
35
44
30 28 27 28 2532 32
2832
44 42 4033
2823 25
22
6
4
5
4 53
6
2
15
52
63
4
7
2
32
3
6
6
4
4 78
13
9
54
34
511
4
3
3
26
6
0
25
50
75
Feb-09
Mar-09
Apr-09
May-09
Jun-09
Jul-09
Aug-09
Sep-09
Oct-09
Nov-09
Dec-09
Jan-10
Feb-10
Mar-10
Apr-10
May-10
Jun-10
Jul-10
Aug-10
Sep-10
Lap Belt TotalEnclosure Bed TotalVest Total
Pilot ImplementationTrauma and Life Support Center (TLC)24 Bed Intensive Care UnitStarted meeting in January, 2010
Oct‐09
Nov‐09
Dec‐09 Jan‐10
Feb‐10
Mar‐10
Apr‐10
May‐10 Jun‐10 Jul ‐10
Aug‐10
Sep‐10
Sep‐10 Total # Restraint Pt's
44.4% 40.9% 40.9% 35.0% 45.5% 41.2% 42.1% 10.5% 56.3% 29.2% 13.3% 13.6% 3
Goals for TLC
Increase use of less restrictive restraint typesDecrease the length of time in restraintsDecrease the number of patients in restraintsReview data at monthly meetings
Strategies
Stock bedside carts with less restrictive restraint typesReview need for restraints daily on roundsReview need for tubes, lines, drainsRestraint not automatic for life sustaining devicesClinical Nurse Specialist daily rounding of patients in restraints
TLC Restraint Prevalence
14.3%
63.2%
47.6%
60.0%
23.5%23.5%
42.9%
31.8%
50.0%52.9%
43.5%47.6%
61.1%
50.0%47.4%
54.5%
35.0%
47.8%
62.5%
47.8%
30.0%
44.4%40.9%40.9%
35.0%
45.5%41.2%42.1%
10.5%
56.3%
29.2%
13.3%13.6%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%Ja
n-08
Feb-
08M
ar-0
8Ap
r-08
May
-08
Jun-
08Ju
l-08
Aug-
08Se
p-08
Oct
-08
Nov
-08
Dec
-08
Jan-
09Fe
b-09
Mar
-09
Apr-
09M
ay-0
9Ju
n-09
Jul-0
9Au
g-09
Sep-
09O
ct-0
9N
ov-0
9D
ec-0
9Ja
n-10
Feb-
10M
ar-1
0Ap
r-10
May
-10
Jun-
10Ju
l-10
Aug-
10Se
p-10
9335 TLC Adult Critical Care Trendline
Number of Restraint Types Documented in Health LinkTLC
0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 04 2 4 3
95
1
9 8 6 5 63 4 5 6
2 4 3 10 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 1 1 0 2 2 3 3 51
4 26 6 5 6
1521
32
21
83
9296
82
98
108
79
89
104 105 105
94
82
106
98
84
72
9188
73
5 4 3 3 3 2 27
2 1 2 3 38
4 4 3 3 4 30
25
50
75
100
125
Feb-09
Mar-09
Apr-09
May-09
Jun-09
Jul-09
Aug-09
Sep-09
Oct-09
Nov-09
Dec-09
Jan-10
Feb-10
Mar-10
Apr-10
May-10
Jun-10
Jul-10
Aug-10
Sep-10
Lap Belt TotalVest TotalEnclosure Bed TotalMitts (R) TotalLimb (R Wrist) TotalElbow Immobilizer (R) TotalLinear (Limb (R Wrist) Total)
Number of Restraint Types Documented in Health LinkTLC
8392 96
82
98108
7989
104 105 10594
82
10698
8472
91 88
73
1
11
0
2
2
3
3
5 1 4
2
6
6
5
6
15
21 32
215
43
3
3
2
2
7
21
2
3
3
8
4
43
3
4
3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
Feb-09
Mar-09
Apr-09
May-09
Jun-09
Jul-09
Aug-09
Sep-09
Oct-09
Nov-09
Dec-09
Jan-10
Feb-10
Mar-10
Apr-10
May-10
Jun-10
Jul-10
Aug-10
Sep-10
Elbow Immobilizer (R) TotalMitts (R) TotalLimb (R Wrist) Total
TLC Average Days in Restraints as Documented in Health Link
0
1
2
3
4
5
Jan-
09
Feb-
09
Mar
-09
Apr
-09
May
-09
Jun-
09
Jul-0
9
Aug
-09
Sep
-09
Oct
-09
Nov
-09
Dec
-09
Jan-
10
Feb-
10
Mar
-10
Apr
-10
May
-10
Jun-
10
Jul-1
0
Aug
-10
Sep
-10
Restraint Hours
Abstracting hours in restraintsDependent upon correct documentation
TLC Unplanned Extubations
52/60 (87%) of the patients were in soft wrist restraints when they had an unplanned extubation for calendar year 2009 (Respiratory Therapy Data)
Documentation Compliance
Restraint Documentation Overall Performance By Month
53 .2 %
6 1.7% 61.7 %
73 .1%
83 .1% 83 .1%
60 .7% 5 9.8%6 4.0%
5 9.6%
75 .3 %
84 .8 %
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
Nov-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar -10 Apr -10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10
General Medicine & Geriatrics
Presented data to unit leadershipShared with unit councilChart review completedNurse resident project beginning on Perceptions of Restraint Use
Neuro ICU
Restraints used per guidelineBenchmark with other neuro ICUChart review – evidence of guideline
25.0% 37.5% 18.8% 31.3% 38.5% 58.3% 35.7% 20.0% 58.3% 40.0% 42.9% 25.0% 3
Oct‐09Nov‐09
Dec‐09 Jan‐10
Feb‐10
Mar‐10 Apr‐10
May‐10 Jun‐10 Jul‐10 Aug‐10 Sep‐10
Sep‐10 Total # Restraint
Pt's
F8/4 Neuro ICU Average Days in Restraints as Documented in Health Link
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Jan-
09
Feb-
09
Mar
-09
Apr
-09
May
-09
Jun-
09
Jul-0
9
Aug
-09
Sep
-09
Oct
-09
Nov
-09
Dec
-09
Jan-
10
Feb-
10
Mar
-10
Apr
-10
May
-10
Jun-
10
Jul-1
0
Aug
-10
Sep
-10
Conclusions
Implementation of an evidence based guideline occurs slowly over timeRequires constant attentionRegular review of the data assists in process Appears to be a strong relationship between restraint documentation data and restraint prevalence data submitted to NDNQI
ReferencesPark, M., Tang, J. H., & Ledford, L. (2005).
Evidence-Based Practice Guideline: Changing the Practice of Physical Restraint Use in Acute Care. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Gerontological Nursing Interventions Research Center (GNIRC), Research Translation and Dissemination Core (RTDC).
Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (2002). Toolkit: Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines. Toronto, Canada: Registered Nurses Association of Ontario.