implementing nato network enabled capability (nnec): implications for nato response
DESCRIPTION
Implementing NATO Network Enabled Capability (NNEC): Implications for NATO Response Force’s Envisioned Roles Reynold F. Palaganas Colonel, US Army Commander, NCSA Sector Mons. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Implementing NATO NetworkImplementing NATO Network Enabled Capability (NNEC): Enabled Capability (NNEC): Implications for NATO Response Implications for NATO Response Force’s Envisioned RolesForce’s Envisioned Roles
Reynold F. PalaganasReynold F. Palaganas
Colonel, US ArmyColonel, US Army Commander, NCSA Sector MonsCommander, NCSA Sector Mons
• Thesis Thesis
• DiscussionDiscussion
• FindingsFindings
• ConclusionsConclusions
• RecommendationsRecommendations
Agenda
“… “… NATO will no longer have the large, massed NATO will no longer have the large, massed units that were necessary for the Cold War, but will units that were necessary for the Cold War, but will have agile and capable forces at Graduated have agile and capable forces at Graduated Readiness levels… [to] prepare the Alliance to meet Readiness levels… [to] prepare the Alliance to meet any threat….” any threat….”
- General (ret) James L. Jones, former SACEUR- General (ret) James L. Jones, former SACEUR
View of NATO Transformation
To To transformtransform NATO Response ForceNATO Response Force (NRF) (NRF) operations operations from a from a “platform-centric”“platform-centric” to a to a “network-“network-centric environmentcentric environment,” NATO Consultation, Command ,” NATO Consultation, Command and Control (C3) elements, NATO’s two strategic and Control (C3) elements, NATO’s two strategic commands, member nations, and industry must commands, member nations, and industry must move beyond Collaborative Information Environment move beyond Collaborative Information Environment (CIE) rhetoric and a “business as usual” Cold War (CIE) rhetoric and a “business as usual” Cold War mindset as mindset as enterprise network stakeholdersenterprise network stakeholders by by implementing a federated NATO Network Enabled implementing a federated NATO Network Enabled Capability (NNEC) concept as the interoperability Capability (NNEC) concept as the interoperability driverdriver that joins common interfaces and information that joins common interfaces and information services.services.
ThesisThesis
The Challenge: A Pictorial View
Users
Maritime Land AirLogistic
s
Network & Comm Services provided within functional areas
Users / Outcomes
OtherAirTargeting
Layers and ‘Building Blocks’ of services provided across functional areas to multiple users
From this - “Stovepiped” Interoperability
To this - “Gridded” Interoperability
• NRF Concept – Two Envisioned RolesNRF Concept – Two Envisioned Roles
MModular, quick reaction forceodular, quick reaction force NATO’s transformation catalyst: entry point for capability NATO’s transformation catalyst: entry point for capability
improvementsimprovements
• NRF PrinciplesNRF Principles (Relative to Capabilities)(Relative to Capabilities)
Deployability Deployability Scalability Scalability Rotation Rotation
NRF Concept and Principles
Land AirMaritime
NATO Task Force Brigade Combat Team 200 Combat Sorties/Day
With Strategic Enablers•Sea/AirLift•Intelligence•Force Protection•Combat Support•Combat Service Support
Deployable Joint Task Deployable Joint Task Force HQForce HQ
Plus Special ForcesTotal Force – approx up to 25,000
NRF at Full Operational Capability (FOC)
NATO Commanders’ Bi-Strategic Vision Concepts
1/3/20061/3/2006 22
CAPABLE FUTURE FORCESCAPABLE FUTURE FORCES
BiBi --SC Strategic VisionSC Strategic VisionEFFECTS BASED APPROACH TO OPERATIONSEFFECTS BASED APPROACH TO OPERATIONS
INFORMATIONSUPERIORITY
NETWORKENABLED
CAPABILITY
EFFECTIVEENGAGEMENT
JOINTMANOEUVRE
ENHANCEDCIMIC
EXPEDITIONARYOPERATIONS
INTEGRATEDLOGISTICS
CAPABILITY MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK
Transformation Objective Areas (TOA)
Transformation Goals (TG)
ACHIEVINGJOINT DEPLOYMENT
&SUSTAINMENT
ACHIEVINGDECISION
SUPERIORITY
ACHIEVINGCOHERENT
EFFECTS
NNEC: It’s About People – Information – Networks
Network
NNEC Conceptual Framework
Raw
Data
IntendedEffect
Information Sphere
Collectors EffectorsDecisionMakers
InformationSuperiority
DecisionSuperiority
ExecutionSuperiority
•Coherent Effect•Joint Deployment
and sustainmentGoals:
People & Human Processes
NATO’s blueprint transformation from a stovepiped to a NetworkingInformation and Infrastructure (NII) enterprise
Relevant NATO Bodies for NNEC
NC3Organisation
NC3Organisation
NATO C3 Agency (NC3A)
NATO C3 Agency (NC3A)
NATO CISSERVICESAGENCY(NCSA)
NORTH ATLANTIC COUNCIL
(NAC)
NORTH ATLANTIC COUNCIL
(NAC)
Military Committee (MC)
Military Committee (MC)
SACEURSACEUR
NATO C3 Board(NC3B)
NATO C3 Board(NC3B)
NC3 RepsNC3 Reps
OPCOM
JFC
NRF- #
OPCON
OPCON
SACTSACT
STRATEGIC COORD
(for CD&E)
• Dealing with a Legacy Platform-Centric Dealing with a Legacy Platform-Centric EnvironmentEnvironment
Lack of Coherent Network-centric Guiding Lack of Coherent Network-centric Guiding Principles or Keystone Authoritative ReferencePrinciples or Keystone Authoritative Reference
Outdated Standardization AgreementsOutdated Standardization Agreements(STANAGs)(STANAGs)
Findings – NNEC Impediments (1 of 3)
• Technological Insertion Concerns – two themes: Technological Insertion Concerns – two themes:
Obtaining Nations’ Consensus to Open Obtaining Nations’ Consensus to Open Standards ArchitectureStandards Architecture
Bridging the Technology/Capability GapBridging the Technology/Capability Gap- Nations Pursuing Different Levels of AmbitionNations Pursuing Different Levels of Ambition- Info Technology Transfer (Transatlantic Info Technology Transfer (Transatlantic Gap; Also, Info Sharing within Europe) Gap; Also, Info Sharing within Europe)
Findings – NNEC Impediments (2 of 3)
• National Funding and NATO Common FundingNational Funding and NATO Common Funding Support ConcernsSupport Concerns
National FundingNational Funding – for Provision and – for Provision and Prioritized Investment of National Military AssetsPrioritized Investment of National Military Assets
NATO Common FundingNATO Common Funding – “Cost-Shares” for – “Cost-Shares” forNATO Capability Projects or NATO Owned NATO Capability Projects or NATO Owned Assets Assets
Findings – NNEC Impediments (3 of 3)
• NATO and nations will rely upon NRF NATO and nations will rely upon NRF as a focal point to operationalize CIE as a focal point to operationalize CIE network enabled common services; network enabled common services; however, however, implementing NNEC presents implementing NNEC presents interoperability challengesinteroperability challenges in migrating in migrating stakeholders away from a platform-stakeholders away from a platform-centric legacy environment to a centric legacy environment to a network-centric force – network-centric force – a “paradigm a “paradigm shift”shift”
Conclusions (1 of 2)
• NRF in quick reaction force roleNRF in quick reaction force role
- Can’t leverage NRF capabilities without - Can’t leverage NRF capabilities without NC3 bodies NC3 bodies breaking awaybreaking away from stovepiped policies, architectures, from stovepiped policies, architectures, and management approaches NNEC is intended to and management approaches NNEC is intended to overcome with this plug-and-operate conceptovercome with this plug-and-operate concept
• NRF in transformation catalyst role NRF in transformation catalyst role
- Can’t accelerate NNEC evolutionary programs or - Can’t accelerate NNEC evolutionary programs or improve NATO/national systems without improve NATO/national systems without firm mutual firm mutual stakeholders’ national commitmentsstakeholders’ national commitments to reduce to reduce technology and capabilities gaps technology and capabilities gaps
Conclusions: Role Implications (2 of 2)
• 1st: Regarding NRF’s quick reaction force role1st: Regarding NRF’s quick reaction force role
- NC3 organizational bodies must reassert - NC3 organizational bodies must reassert overarching CIS interoperability roles and overarching CIS interoperability roles and responsibilities and focus on “quick wins”responsibilities and focus on “quick wins”
Recommendations (1 of 3)
• 2d: Regarding NRF’s transformation catalyst 2d: Regarding NRF’s transformation catalyst role role
- NC3 organizational bodies should exploit distributed - NC3 organizational bodies should exploit distributed Alliance cross-cutting capabilities, integrating NNEC Alliance cross-cutting capabilities, integrating NNEC economies of scale where consensus is possibleeconomies of scale where consensus is possible
- Nations must have political will to invest upfront in - Nations must have political will to invest upfront in network-centric initiatives while reducing investments network-centric initiatives while reducing investments to recapitalize national legacy systemsto recapitalize national legacy systems
Recommendations (2 of 3)
• 3d: Regarding industry3d: Regarding industry
- NC3 organizational bodies and nations - NC3 organizational bodies and nations must stay connected with industry forums must stay connected with industry forums such as Network Centric Operations such as Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium – Industry Consortium – implementing implementing NNEC in the NRF is an intellectual teaming NNEC in the NRF is an intellectual teaming effort effort
Recommendations (3 of 3)
Comments/QuestionsComments/Questions
Published work can be found at this website: http://www.carlisle.army.mil/usacsl/index.asp
Click on “Information as Power”
Backup ChartsBackup Charts
Discussion: Network Centric Warfare (NCW) Background
Office of Force Transformation
• A Robustly Networked Force Improves Information Sharing• Information Sharing And Collaboration Enhances the Quality of
Information and Shared Situational Awareness• Shared Situational Awareness Enables Collaboration and Self
Synchronization, and Enhances Sustainability and Speed of Command• These, in Turn, Dramatically Increase Mission Effectiveness
Tenets of NCW: A Hypothesis Regarding Sources of Power
Physical Domain
Cognitive + Social Domains
Information Domain
Robustly Networked
Force
Information Sharing
Collaboration
Shared SituationalAwareness
Quality of Information
Mission Effectiveness
Self Synchronization
New Processes
Tenets of Network Centric Warfare…The New Value Chain – High Level
• Network-Centric Frames of ReferenceNetwork-Centric Frames of Reference • U.S. – Net Centric Operations and U.S. – Net Centric Operations and
Warfare (NCOW)Warfare (NCOW)• U.K. – Network-Enabled Capability (NEC)U.K. – Network-Enabled Capability (NEC)
Discussion: NNEC - Background