importance of two-fluid in helicity injection current drive

12
1 Importance of two-fluid in helicity injection current drive

Upload: amery-marshall

Post on 30-Dec-2015

23 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Importance of two-fluid in helicity injection current drive. Outline of points. Current can follow field lines without ion-fluid flow Current is a two fluid phenomenon Single-fluid dynamo looks harder to drive than two-fluid dynamo - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Importance of two-fluid in helicity injection current drive

1

Importance of two-fluid in helicity injection current drive

Page 2: Importance of two-fluid in helicity injection current drive

Jarboe 8-13-07

Outline of points

• Current can follow field lines without ion-fluid flow

• Current is a two fluid phenomenon

• Single-fluid dynamo looks harder to drive than two-fluid dynamo

• GEM challenge shows that two-fluid MHD gives faster reconnection than just resistive MHD

• Hall Physics affects low frequency physics through the whistler wave

Page 3: Importance of two-fluid in helicity injection current drive

Jarboe 8-13-07 3

Current follows open field lines in CHI experiments

1 m

Page 4: Importance of two-fluid in helicity injection current drive

Jarboe 8-13-07

Current can follow field lines without ion-fluid flow

• In Figure, the electrodes are blue. Assume no pressure. In steady state, current approximately follows B-field.

• In single fluid cross-field current is required to maintain the necessary flows to balance Ex. (v = Ex/B ).

• In two fluid, with large , a small cross field current balances Ex with no flow

• (Small jx drives jz which produces Ex)

• Initially, with Hall jy  jz   ()2jx. Without Hall jx jy

+V

a abb

c

y

z x

B

I

Ex

2

2

1

( ) 1x

y

I c

I ab

Page 5: Importance of two-fluid in helicity injection current drive

Jarboe 8-13-07

Single-fluid dynamo appears harder to drive than two-fluid dynamo

epj BE v B j

ne ne

,ov v v Substitute oB B B etc.

Without Hall, in steady state, ( ) for parallel current drive0E

v B j Where v is of the massive fluid

With Hall: ev B j

• It is the electron motion in both cases that does the current drive.

• In two-fluid, ion motion is not necessary. Hence, it should be easier.

• (Dynamo across closed flux is possible.)

Page 6: Importance of two-fluid in helicity injection current drive

Jarboe 8-13-07

t (i-1)

ReconnectedFlux

0 10 20 30 400

1

2

3

4

NIMROD 2fl, Pm=3

NIMROD MHD, Pm=1NIMROD 2fl, Pm=1

Nonlinear GEM Benchmark

GEM challenge shows that two-fluid MHD gives faster reconnection than just resistive MHD

• Cannot expect resistive MHD to predict relaxation rates in HIT-SI and HIT-II

• NIMROD may be most accurate. Others use mi/me = 25?

• For benchmarking only NIMROD may need a dj/dt term in Ohm’s law because the others have massive “electrons”.

• Since the saturation of Hall effects is often ions carrying their own current, such a dj/dt term with a calibration coefficient, determined by experiments, might be useful.

Page 7: Importance of two-fluid in helicity injection current drive

Jarboe 8-13-07

Hall Physics affects low frequency physics through the whistler wave

Dispersion diagram for right handed parallel electromagnetic wave

Page 8: Importance of two-fluid in helicity injection current drive

Jarboe 8-13-07

Summary

• Discrepancy seen between HIT-SI and resistive MHD is expected.

• Similar discrepancy may be found in the flux-amplification cases of HIT-II.

• Two-fluid effects should be in the correct direction for better agreement with HIT-SI ( 100). (HIT-SI appears to have much higher relaxation rates than resistive MHD.)

• A dj/dt term in the Ohm’s law with a calibration factor might be useful, since it will be difficult to model very high frequency Hall physics.

Page 9: Importance of two-fluid in helicity injection current drive

Generalized Ohm’s law including Hall terms is needed to analyze the dynamo.

• The essence of the pressureless, perfectly conducting generalized Ohm’s law with Hall physics is that the electron fluid is tied to the magnetic field.

 

• Resistivity allows the slippage between magnetic field and the electron fluid. 

• The pressureless generalized Ohms law is found by a Lorentz transformation from the inertial electron fluid frame (where E = j) to the Lab frame yielding:

• Thus, like Maxwell’s equations, the generalized Ohm’s law is only valid in an inertial (non-accelerating) frame.

WARNING: Maxwell’s equations and the generalized Ohm’s law are not valid in fluctuating flux coordinates.

e ne j BE v B j v B j

Page 10: Importance of two-fluid in helicity injection current drive

Jarboe 8-13-07

Dynamo mechanism may come from fluctuation modes coupling the driven and confinement regions

• Time averaging the generalized Ohm’s law including the Hall terms yields [Ji 99]

•  For simplicity, assume ion fluctuation currents are small

 

• Fluctuation magnetic structure alone provides the coupling between driven and confinement regions and our intuitive pictures of field line tension and pressure are valid.

E j ev B

E jne j B

Page 11: Importance of two-fluid in helicity injection current drive

Jarboe 8-13-07

confinementregion

anti-current drive

driven region

 

current drive

• Mode crossection (black) in plane of equilibrium field (red, blue)

•Assumes electron flow is in the direction of field

 External drive must overcome anti-current drive

•Current drive can maintain closed flux current

•Sheared electron flow due to lamada gradient distorts mode resulting in cross-field current drive stress.

•Practically any mode will cause relaxation CD.

•First mode will stabilize rest. (Get the physics right and mode should be right one.)

Intuitive shape of relaxation dynamo mode emerges

Page 12: Importance of two-fluid in helicity injection current drive

Jarboe 8-13-07

•A magnetic probe array was inserted into a rotating CHI driven discharge on HIT-II.

•Discharge has a well repeating n=1 mode so that a rigid rotation analysis reveals the toroidal mode structure.

•Current drive and anti-current driving fluctuations have also been measured on RFP [Den Hartog 99, Fontana 00] and spheromks [al-Karkhy 93]

Experimental data also shows a current driving n=1 mode structure in an ST.

Toroidal angle [radians]

Poloidal flux at innermost probe (10cm)

Time [ms]Shot # 26070

Fluctuation flux at 3ms, (10μWb spacing)