imposing the froissart bound on dis ---> new pdf's for the lhc
DESCRIPTION
Imposing the Froissart bound on DIS ---> New PDF's for the LHC. Martin Block Northwestern University. No time to talk about these. But they are important!. New fitting constraints - --“New analyticity constraints on hadron-hadron cross sections”, M. Block, Eur. Phys. J. C 47, 697 (2006).. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
1
Imposing the Froissart bound on DIS---> New PDF's for the LHC
Martin BlockNorthwestern University
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
2
1) Data selection: The “Sieve” Algorithm---“Sifting data in the real world”,
M. Block, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A, 556, 308 (2006).
3) Fitting the accelerator data---“New evidence for the Saturation of the Froissart Bound”, M. Block and F. Halzen, Phys. Rev. D 72, 036006 (2005).
OUTLINE
2) New fitting constraints---“New analyticity constraints on hadron-hadron cross sections”, M. Block, Eur. Phys. J. C 47, 697 (2006).
No time to talk about these. But they are important!
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
3
4) The Proton Structure Function F2p(x,Q2) :
“Small-x Behavior of Parton Distributions from the Observed Froissart Energy Dependence of the Deep-Inelastic-Scattering Cross Sections”, M. M. Block, Edmund L. Berger and Chung-I tan, Phys.Rev. Lett. 308 (2006).
5) Global Structure Function Fit and New Gluon Distributions using the Froissart Bound :Work in progress for this meeting ! M. M. Block, Edmund L. Berger and Chung-I Tan,
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
4
Part 1: “Sifting Data in the Real World”,
M. Block, arXiv:physics/0506010 (2005); Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A, 556, 308 (2006).
“Fishing” for Data
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
5
Lorentzian Fit used in “Sieve” Algorithm
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
6
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
7
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
8
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
9
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
10
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
11
You are now finished! No more outliers. You have: 1) optimized parameters 2) corrected goodness-of-fit 3) squared error matrix.
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
12
This is FESR(2) derived by Igi and Ishida, which follows from analyticity, just as dispersion relations do.
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
13
so that:exp’t ( (0),
dexp’t (dd (0) d,
or, its practical equivalent,
exp’t ( (0),
exp’t ( (1), for
for both pp and pbar-p exp’t cross sections
We can also prove that for odd amplitudes:
odd (0) = odd (0).
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
14
Francis, Francis, personally personally funding ICE funding ICE CUBECUBE
Part 3: Fitting the accelerator data---“New evidence for the Saturation of the Froissart Bound”, M. Block and F. Halzen, Phys. Rev. D 72, 036006 (2005).
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
15
ln2(s/s0) fit=0.5, Regge-
descending trajectory
7 parameters needed, including f+(0), a dispersion relation subtraction constant
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
16
Only 3 Free Parameters
However, only 2, c1 and c2, are needed in cross section fits !
These anchoring conditions, just above the resonance regions, are analyticity conditions!
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
17
Cross section fits for Ecms > 6 GeV, anchored at 4 GeV,
pp and pbar p, after applying “Sieve” algorithm
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
18
-value fits for Ecms > 6 GeV, anchored at 4 GeV,
pp and pbar p, after applying “Sieve” algorithm
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
19
What the “Sieve” algorithm accomplished for the pp and pbar p data
Before imposing the “Sieve algorithm:
2/d.f.=5.7 for 209 degrees of freedom;
Total 2=1182.3.
After imposing the “Sieve” algorithm:
Renormalized 2/d.f.=1.09 for 184 degrees of freedom, for 2i > 6 cut;
Total 2=201.4.
Probability of fit ~0.2.
The 25 rejected points contributed 981 to the total 2 , an average 2i
of ~39 per point.
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
20
Cross section and -value predictions for pp and pbar-p
The errors are due to the statistical uncertainties in the fitted parameters
LHC prediction
Cosmic Ray Prediction
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
21
More LHC predictions, from the Aspen Eikonal Model
Nuclear slope B = 19.39 ± 0.13 (GeV/c)-2
elastic = 30.79 ± 0.34 mb
Differential Elastic Scattering
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
22
Saturating the Froissart Boundpp and pbar-p log2(/m) fits, with world’s supply of data
Cosmic ray points & QCD-fit from Block, Halzen and Stanev: Phys. Rev. D 66, 077501 (2000).
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
23
Conclusions From hadron-hadron scattering
The Froissart bound for p, p and pp collisions is saturated at high energies.
3) At cosmic ray energies,we can make accurate estimates of pp and Bpp from collider data.
4) Using a Glauber calculation of p-air from pp and Bpp, we now have a reliable benchmark tying together colliders to cosmic rays.
2) At the LHC,
tot = 107.3 1.2 mb, = 0.1320.001.
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
24
Proton Structure Function F2(x,Q2), from Deep Inelastic Scattering, Block, Berger & Tan, PRL 99, 88 (2006).
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
25
Reduced Virtual Photon Total Cross Section
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
26
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
27
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
28
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
29
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
30
Froissart bound fit, ln2 W, to reduced cross sections
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
31
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
32
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
33
Scaling Point
Global (Simultaneous) Fit of F2(x,Q2) to x and Q2
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
34
What the “Sieve” algorithm accomplished for F2(x,Q2)
Before imposing the “Sieve algorithm:
2/d.f.=1.30 for 177 degrees of freedom;
Total 2=229.4.
After imposing the “Sieve” algorithm:
Renormalized 2/d.f.=1.09 for 169 degrees of freedom, for 2i > 6 cut;
Total 2=184.2.
Probability of fit ~0.2.
The 8 rejected points contributed 63.45 to the total 2 , an average 2i
of ~8 per point.
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
35
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
36
Predictions are made using ZEUS data in
global fit
Experimental data are from H1 collaboration
NO RENORMALIZATION
made!
1 Q2 GeV2
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
37
SUMMARY
.
Jan, 2007 M. Block, Aspen Winter Physics Conference
38
To be done:
1. Include H1 in global fit, simultaneously fitting F2, dF2
/d(logQ2), d(logF2) /d(log x)
2. More gluon distributions
3. Quark distributions
4. Recalculate cosmic ray neutrino cross sections;
current values are much too big! Needs x~10-8 and Q2~6400 GeV2 !
Enormous extrapolation.