improving collective intelligence to promote better cities

SMART CIVIC CITIES: IMPROVING COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE TO PROMOTE BETTER CITIES24 OCTOBER 2014 | VNG

JOSÉ CARLOS MOTA DOCENTE E INVESTIGADOR DO DCSPT - UNIVERSIDADE DE [email protected]

LINK

1. DO WE REALY NEED

SMART CITIES?

1. SMART CITIES

MAINSTREAM APPROACH

CITY AS AN URBAN SYSTEM; FOCUS ON HARDWARE

NEOLIBERAL AND TECHNOLOGY-PUSH PERSPECTIVE

APPLIED SPECIALLY TO GLOBAL CITIES

INVESTMENT IN HIGHLY COST INFRA-STRUCTURES

OVERVIEW: http://www.smartcitiesitsallaboutpeople.net/

RESULTS / CRITICS

INFRASTRUTURE

BIG PROJECTS

INCREASING SPATIAL INEQUALITIES

LACK OF CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT

SOFT TECHNOLOGIES MAY HAVE BETTER ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RETURNS

1. HUMAN SMART CITIES

«NEW» APPROACH

SMALL SCALE AND HIGH IMPACT PROJECTS

MORE ROOTED IN THE LOCAL ENVIRONMENT

RESULTS

«governments engage citizens»«peer-to-peer relationship based on reciprocal trust and collaboration»«city where people are the main actors of urban “smartness”»«adopts services that are born from people’s real needs and have been co-designed through interactive, dialogic, and collaborative processes»

OVERVIEW: http://www.smartcitiesitsallaboutpeople.net/

HSC - PERIPHÈRIA PROJECT

2. A NEW

«CIVIC AGENDA» FOR SMART CITIES?

HOW ARE WE USING OUR CIVIC RIGHTS?

2. CIVIC AGENDA FOR SMATER CITIES

AT NATIONAL LEVEL

ELECTIONS & POLICY DISCUSSIONS

LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS

PROJECTS & PLANS

AT LOCAL LEVEL

PERSONAL/FAMILY LIFE

AT HOME/WORK LEVEL

JOB

AT EUROPEAN LEVEL

ELECTIONS & BUDGET

ELECTIONS & POLICY DISCUSSIONS

25,6% dos inquiridos portugueses assumiam-se como associativistas, o que ainda assim tornava Portugal o país europeu com a mais baixa taxa associativa (Delicado, 2003: 232-5).

«os portugueses são o povo mais desconfiado da Europa Ocidental e ocupam a 25ª posição entre 26 países. Para quase 20 por cento dos portugueses e franceses "para se chegar ao topo, é necessário ser corrupto» OCDE (2007)

«45% dos portugueses suspeitam dos outros, mas os números disparam se o alvo for o governo (70%)» Estudo TESE (2010)

WE REALLY DON’T HAVE A TRADITION OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION


ALTHOUGHT…

SOCIAL MEDIA AND PUBLIC SPACE

THE POWE OF SOCIAL NETWORKS (REAL AND VIRTUAL)

ALBOI NEIGHBOURHOOD PROJECT

http://contraoalboicortadoaomeio.blogs.sapo.pt/

A SMALL CORNER OF THE WORLD


ALTHOUGHT!

ALBOI NEIGHBOURHOOD PROJECT

THE POWE OF SOCIAL NETWORKS (REAL AND VIRTUAL)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dX_sEWp1Yh0



ALTHOUGHT!

CROWDED PUBLIC MEETING

PRODUCE OPINION COLLECTIVITY

CAN WE BUILT A CITY AGAINST THEIR INHABITANTS?

FOOTH BRIDGE IN A WATER CHANNEL


http://contrapontepedonalnocanalcentral.blogs.sapo.pt/


ALTHOUGHT!

CAN A WATER CHANNEL BE IN THE HART OF THE COMMUNITY?

CAFFE MEETING’S

CREATE ARENAS FOR DEBATE


http://contrapontepedonalnocanalcentral.blogs.sapo.pt/


ALTHOUGHT!

USE THE PUBLIC SPACEMANIFESTO FOR THE PUBLIC SPACE

CELEBRATING PUBLIC SPACE


http://programadasfestas.blogs.sapo.pt/

ALL CHANGES ARE EPHEMERAL AND REVERSIBLE PERSERVERANCE IS A KEY FACTOR!

MYTHS AND PREJUDICES

PEOPLE DO PARTICIPATE IF

DESPITE

ADEQUATE ARENAS (VIRTUAL & FACE2FACE)

DIFICULTIES AND LIMITATIONS

COLLABORATIVE ENVIRONMENT (TRUST & EMPATHY)

LACK TRADITION

THEY HAVE ACCESS TO INFORMATION (EXPERTISE)

THERE IS A COMMON SHARE OF IDEAS (CO-CREATE)

THEY FEEL THEIR VOICES CAN BE HEARD (INFLUENCE)

COLLECTIVE ISSUES/CONCERNS


ECONOMY

GROWTH AND CREATE JOBS

WHY DO WE NEED A CIVIC AGENDA (IN PORTUGAL)?

2. CIVIC AGENDA

DEMOCRACY

PREVENT CAPTURE OF PUBLIC INTEREST

SOCIAL

HEALTH, SOLIDARITY, INCLUSIVE

WE NEED ACTION AND HOPE!

ENVIROMENT

CONTROL EMISSIONS / CLIMATE CHANGE

2. CIVIC AGENDA

REDISCOVER RESOURCES IN CITIES (DEVALUED OR UNKNOWN)

NETWORKS OF PROXIMITY (ORGANIZATIONS AND EQUIPMENT)

SPACES VACANT UNDERUTILIZED OR (AND NOT BUILT BUILT, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE)

KNOWLEDGE ABOUT CITIES AND ITS RESOURCES

CIVIC AND INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY

WHY DO WE NEED A CIVIC AGENDA (IN PORTUGAL)?

WE HAVE RESOURCES THAT WE DON’T USE

ICT INFRASTRUCTURES / KNOWLEDGE

‘Temos de ir caminhando pelas ruas e conversando com as pessoas para ir à procura dessas micro-histórias‘

2. CIVIC AGENDA

KNOWLEDGE ABOUT CITIES AND ITS RESOURCES

LOCAL KNOWLEDGE + SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE

MAPPING, SHARING, LINKING

CO-PRODUCING

VACANT OR UNDERUTILIZED SPACES (PUBLIC AND PRIVATE)

a imaginação para preencher o vazio, em Aveiro!LINK: https://www.facebook.com/vivacidade.aveiro

Antiga garagem na Covilhã transformada em espaço de arte e cultura (SIC)LINK: http://sicnoticias.sapo.pt/cultura/2014-06-09-antiga-garagem-na-covilha-transformada-em-espaco-de-arte-e-cultura

2. CIVIC AGENDA

produzir o seu adequado mapeamento e sistematização para permitir construir colaborativamente uma nova narrativa sobre as questões críticas locais, valorizando esses recursos, e com isso produzir um outro tipo de políticas.

NETWORKS OF PROXIMITY (ORGANIZATIONS AND EQUIPMENT)

2. CIVIC AGENDA

Manuel Assunção, A Universidade de Aveiro como universidade cívica

CIVIC AND INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY

2. CIVIC AGENDA

ICT INFRASTRUCTURE AND KNOWLEDGE

2. CIVIC AGENDA

'urbanização da tecnologia' - uma forma particular transformar, adaptar ou mesmo ‘hackear’ a 'tecnologia' para responder a problemas e necessidades da comunidade (empresarial, artística, científica, associativa e cívica).

A tecnologia vai desde o carro, a bicicleta, mobiliário urbano, edifícios, passando pelosdispositivos móveis, redes, etc..,

A cidade (em particular os seus utilizadores, residentes, organizações, ecologias) pode ser o palco da identificação de novas necessidades de resposta e da adequação bem sucedida ('hackear') da tecnologia a essas necessidades (Sassen, 2012)

verhttp://www.engagetv.com/webcast_Saskia-Sassen-Urbanizing-Technology-PICNIC-Festival-2011

3. HOW ARE WE USING OUR

COLLECTIVE INTELIGENCE?

3.1 WHAT DO WE MEAN BY COLLECTIVE INTELIGENCE?

COLLECTIVE INTELIGENCE CONCEPT

«Empowerment through the development and pooling of intelligence to attain common goals or to resolve common problems» Brown and Lauder (2000)

«Social glue that holds societies together» Brown and Lauder (2000)

V. IMP. «the extent to which people are institutionally encouraged («trust») to pool their capacity (knowledge, technology and intellectual resources) for intelligent action (solve collective problems)» Brown and Lauder (2000)

LIDERANÇAS QUE AJUDAM OS GRUPOS A AGIR COLECTIVAMENTE DE MODO MAIS INTELIGENTE

3.2 WHY SHOULD WE USE COLLECTIVE INTELIGENCE?

http://cci.mit.edu/malone/

http://vimeo.com/37389182

THOMAS MALONE, MIT (2011)

ESTUDO MIT CONCLUIU QUE A IC

está fracamente correlacionado com a média e máxima inteligência do grupo;não está correlacionada com a satiafação do grupo, motivação coesão;está significativamente correlacionada com:

PERCEPÇÃO SOCIAL (capacidade dos membros lerem as expressões e emoçõesdos outros);IGUALDADE DE PARTICIPAÇÃO NA CONVERSAÇÃO;PROPORÇÃO DE MULHERES NO GRUPO (relacionado com o 1.º);

IMPORTA NÃO SÓ A INTELIGÊNCIA INDIDIVUAL DAS PESSOAS MAS A INTELIGÊNCIA COLECTIVA DOS GRUPOS

TRIPLE-HELIX PLATFORMS

TECHNOLOGICAL PARKS

SHARING PLATFORMS

UNIVERSITIES

ENTERPRISESCENTRAL

REGIONALLOCAL

AUTHORITIES

PROJECTS

INDUSTRIAL PARKS

TETRA-HELIX PLATFORMS

CIVICUNIVERSITIY

ENTERPRISESSUB-REGIONAL

LOCAL AUTHORITIES

NGOCITIZENS

URBAN LAB

LIVING LAB

PARTNERSHIPS

TECHNOLOGICAL PLATFORMS

3.3 HOW ARE WE USING C.I.?

DIY

CO-CREATION

CROWDFUNDING

COLLABORATIVE MAPPING

BICYCLE INOVATIVE ECOSSISTEM

BICYCLE TECHN. PLATF.

UNIVERSITYAVEIRO

BICYCLE INDUSTRY

ASSOCIATIONABIMOTA

CIRAAVEIRO REGION

INTERMUNICIPAL

COMMUNITY

NGOCITIZENS

3.4 COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE IN AVEIRO

INOVARIAICT CLUSTER ASSOCIATION

PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS

CYCLING FEDERATION

MIRALAGO BEWEGEN

PONTO .CMICRO-IOUBIWHERE

BIKEEMOTION(…)

LARUSREVIGRÉS

AMORIM CORK

PARENT ASSOCIATIONSTRANSITION GROUPS

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATIONS

POLICE – PSPSCHOOLS

BICYCLE DESIGNERSCYCLE TOURISM

OPERATORSTEXTIL MANUFACTORS

OTHER UNIVERSITIES AND RESEARCH

CENTRES

SPORT FACILITIESVELODROME

COMMON GOAL

BICYCLE ACCESSORIES

MIRANDA IRMÃORODI

POLISPORT

INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS

LIVEABLE CITIES



SISTEMAS PARTILHADOS DE

BICICLETAS COLECTIVAS

FIRST BIKE



BIKE DATA

c/ ESTGA

MAPEAMENTO DO VALOR ECONÓMICO

DA BICICLETA

c/ ESTGA

4. FRAMEWORKFOR A SMART CIVIC CITY!

4.1 SMART CIVIC CITY

CONCEPT

TETRA-HELIX PLATFORMS CENTRED IN CITIES

Inspired: http://www.publicsphereproject.org/

ABILITY TO WORK COLLABORATIVELY AND TO USE THE COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE

IDENTIFY, VALUE AND USE RESOURCES (DEVALUED OR UNKNOWN)

TO ANSWER TO NEEDS, PROBLEMS AND DREAMS

CREATING PARTNERSHIPS WITH A SHARED LEADERSHIP

LEARNING COMMUNITY (ENVIRONMENT, INFRASTRUCTURES, IDEAS AND PRACTICES)

ARE WE READY?

4.2. CIVIC CHALLENGE

HOPE SO!

CHALLENGES

PUBLIC MEDIATION – TRUST

ARENAS/PLATFORMS – EMPATHY

COLLECTIVE IDEAS -> PUBLIC POLICIES/ CO-OPERATIVE BUSINESSES

COMMUNICATE THE PROCESS

KNOWLEDGE -> DEVELOPMENT

JOSÉ CARLOS MOTA – DOCENTE E INVESTIGADOR DO DCSPT - UNIVERSIDADE DE [email protected] | [email protected] | https://www.facebook.com/josecarlosmota

SUGESTÕES DE REFLEXÃO

http://estadosocial.blogs.sapo.pthttp://cidadescomaspessoas.blogs.sapo.pt/http://amigosdavenida.blogs.sapo.pt/

http://www.ua.pt/ptbicicleta/https://www.facebook.com/ptbicicletahttp://planeamentoregionaleurbano.blogs.sapo.pt/https://www.facebook.com/PlaneamentoRegionaleUrbanohttps://www.facebook.com/DCSPT

improving collective intelligence to promote better cities

Education