improving drug discovery by nucleic acid delivery in...

3
Cell Metabolism, Volume 29 Supplemental Information Improving Drug Discovery by Nucleic Acid Delivery in Engineered Human Microlivers Liliana Mancio-Silva, Heather E. Fleming, Alex B. Miller, Stuart Milstein, Abigail Liebow, Patrick Haslett, Laura Sepp-Lorenzino, and Sangeeta N. Bhatia

Upload: others

Post on 24-Jan-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Improving Drug Discovery by Nucleic Acid Delivery in ...lmrt.mit.edu/sites/default/files/1-s2.0-S...Cell Metabolism, Volume 29 Supplemental Information Improving Drug Discovery by

Cell Metabolism, Volume 29

Supplemental Information

Improving Drug Discovery by Nucleic Acid

Delivery in Engineered Human Microlivers

Liliana Mancio-Silva, Heather E. Fleming, Alex B. Miller, Stuart Milstein, AbigailLiebow, Patrick Haslett, Laura Sepp-Lorenzino, and Sangeeta N. Bhatia

Page 2: Improving Drug Discovery by Nucleic Acid Delivery in ...lmrt.mit.edu/sites/default/files/1-s2.0-S...Cell Metabolism, Volume 29 Supplemental Information Improving Drug Discovery by

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

Figure S1. CYP3A4 silencing in MPCCs. Related to Figures 2 and 3. (A) Relative urea levels in the culture supernatant of CYP3A4-silenced MPCCs, as determined by a colorimetric assay. Values are mean ± SEM (n=2). (B) Relative 6β-hydroxytestosterone levels in the supernatant measured by mass spectrometry after incubation with testosterone on day 4 post-transfection (schematic of the reaction shown on the left). 6β-hydroxytestosterone peak area was normalized to untreated cells. Values are mean ± SEM (n=2). (C) CYP2E1 mRNA levels at day 3 post-transfection. Values (mean ±SEM, n=2) were normalized to untreated MPCCs.

Figure S2. GalNAc-mediated silencing in MPCCs. Related to Figure 4. (A) ASGPR expression in one of the 3 assayed donors at the time of siRNA addition. A representative hepatocyte island is shown, with a zoomed inset on the right. Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) GalNAc- and dose-dependent AAT silencing in free-uptake mode. Values were normalized to untreated cells (mean ± SD). A representative of 3 tested hepatocyte donors is shown.

A B

0 4 8 12 16 200

25

50

75

100

125

Time (days)

Secr

eted

AAT

(%)

AAT siRNA GalNAc-free 100nMAAT siRNA GalNAc-free 25nMAAT siRNA GalNAc-free 5nM

AAT siRNA GalNAc 100nMAAT siRNA GalNAc 25nMAAT siRNA GalNAc 5nM

untreatedASGPR Dapi

A B

untre

ated

contr

ol siR

NA

CYP3A4 s

iRNA

CYP2D6 s

iRNA

CYP3A4/2

D6 siR

NA0

50

100

150

6β-O

H-te

stos

tero

ne (%

)

testosterone

6β-hydroxy testosterone

CYP3A4

untre

ated

contr

ol siR

NA

CYP2E1 s

iRNA

0

25

50

75

100

125

150

CYP

2E1

mR

NA

(%)

C

0 4 8 12 16 200

25

50

75

100

125

150

Time (days)

Secr

eted

ure

a (%

)

untreated

CYP3A4 siRNAcontrol siRNA

Page 3: Improving Drug Discovery by Nucleic Acid Delivery in ...lmrt.mit.edu/sites/default/files/1-s2.0-S...Cell Metabolism, Volume 29 Supplemental Information Improving Drug Discovery by

Table S1. List of GalNAc-conjugated and unconjugated siRNA sequences. Related to STAR Methods. siRNA Sense (5’-3’) Antisense (3’-5’) CD81 UGCUCUUCGUCUUCAAUUUCA UGAAAUUGAAGACGAAGAGCAGG SERPINA1 (AAT) CACCUGGAAAAUGAACUCACA UGUGAGUUCAUTUUCCAGGUGCU Table S2. List of primer sequences. Related to STAR Methods. Primer Forward Reverse CYP3A4 CCGAGTGGATTTCCTTCAGCTG TGCTCGTGGTTTCATAGCCAGC CYP2D6 GCAAGAAGTCGCTGGAGCAGTG CTCACGGCTTTGTCCAAGAGAC CYP2E1 GAGCACCATCAATCTCTGGACC CACGGTGATACCGTCCATTGTG gapdh GTCTCCTCTGACTTCAACAGCG ACCACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCAA