improving valuations and unlocking sector capacity
DESCRIPTION
Improving valuations and unlocking sector capacity. NHF Treasury Management Conference, 30 Euston Square, London Andy Smith, Director, Valuations – Savills 8 th October 2014. UK Housing Tenure – More Market Renting? More intermediate tenures?. Social housing stagnant - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
savills.com
Improving valuations and unlocking sector capacityNHF Treasury Management Conference, 30 Euston Square, London
Andy Smith, Director, Valuations – Savills
8th October 2014
UK Housing Tenure – More Market Renting? More intermediate tenures?
1918
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Home ownership Social housing Market renting
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f d
we
llin
g s
tock in
En
gla
nd
(%
)
Opportunity?
Source: Savills, CLG, Survey of English Housing
Social housing stagnant
Home ownership in decline
In-betweeners
Market renting expected to increase
Policy flexibility
Opportunity for social landlords and institutions
Quality product
The Housing Association world is changing
HA’s – moving into private renting and build for sale Internal cross subsidy Becoming providers across all tenures JV’s/ investment partnerships Looking at assets (honest) Bogged down in low value areas
Privately Owned HA’s - For Profit RP’s 2013: 25 registered; 10 in pipeline, some substantial Range of innovative forms of Affordable
Change Drivers: Political
Government messages to RPs – build additional homes, and value for money– or merge and let someone else use the asset base
HCA wants a smaller number of larger partners and delivery of the agenda
More Welfare Reform
Additional uncertainty in HA capital and revenue income stream despite CPI plus 1% rent settlement – Univ Credit cap not helpful so make max use of resources
Housing supply – lessons from the past?
Source: DCLG +Savills
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
Private Enterprise Housing AssociationsLocal Authorities Private Completions Potential
Ne
w H
ou
sin
g C
om
ple
tion
s in
En
gla
nd Supply gap over and above private sector
construction – filled with market rent & af-fordable housing?
?
Government plans to deliver 165,000 affordable homes between 2015 and 2018
Affordable Homes Programme - HCA Funding for new homes at 80% market rents. Up to 2015 allocated. £1.7bn 2015 -18 To hopefully fund 165,000 new homes 75% of grant if on site pre March 2015
Affordable Homes Guarantee Programme - HCA Government debt guarantee to bring down the cost of borrowing for new homes. Approximately £220m has so far been allocated out of a £350m fund to be spent by
2017.
But Starts down by 5,650 in 2014 Enthusiasm of HA players? Level of grant? Regulatory burden? Affordable Rents = more risky
than Target Rents?
Are we clear about our objectives?
Low and affordable rents
Good quality well managed homes
House maximum number of people
Build more Housing
Community initiatives
Ok - let’s use the profit approach to help us meet our objectives
Why is the profit motive good for Housing?
Higher surpluses
Greater financial capacity
More money to spend on meeting objectives
Make the right compromises
Use finite resources more effectively
The key is what you do with the profits
EUV-SH or MV-STTHow do they differ?
£0
£50,000
£100,000
£150,000
£200,000
£250,000
£300,000
New House New Flat 1930s House 1970s Flat
VP
MV-STT
EUV-SH
What does that mean in terms of £££s?
EUV-SH MV-STT VP
Asset Value £1m £2m £3m
Loan to Value 1.10 1.25 N/A
Amount Borrowed £909,000 £1,600,000
Existing Use Value for Social Housing Key Factors Affecting Valuation
Assumes sale to another RP only
Social / target / affordable rent levels
Rental growth
Condition – costs to repair / maintain
Discount Rate (All Risks Yield)
Market Value subject to TenanciesKey Factors Affecting Valuation
Assumes Mortgagee in possession
Move from Social/Affordable to Market rent levels
Active Asset Management
Opportunistic sale of voids/break up
Yield required by investor
Does location matter?
YES!
In some parts of the Country, MV-STT and EUV-SH will be the same
It’s all in the Rents!
Does location matter?
£0
£20,000
£40,000
£60,000
£80,000
£100,000
£120,000
£140,000
£160,000 Average Max Bid by Local Authority
Price movements for VP’s, MVSTTs and EUVSH - illustration
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1400000
1600000
1800000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MV-VP
MV-STT
EUV-SH
Uplift above Base EUVSH by type
Tenure % EUV-SHExtra Care 81%General Needs 137%Mixed Lots 130%
Housing for Older People 138%
Intermediate Rent 100%
Shared Ownership 81%Sheltered 128%Supported 165% 127%
£15k per unit released for new development
So what does this tell us?
What are we being asked to value?
Its all in the lotting!
Market Evidence points to latent headroom in EUV-SH values
MV-STT is a higher value – but LTV?
Funders Attitudes