improving voice quality in international mobile-to-mobile calls
DESCRIPTION
Improving Voice Quality in International Mobile-to-Mobile Calls. Aram Falsafi, Seattle, WA [email protected] PIMRC 2008 18 September 2008. Presentation Outline. Introduction & Problem Statement Current State of the Art Description of Proposed Architecture Instrumentation Methodology - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Improving Voice Quality in International Mobile-to-Mobile Calls
Aram Falsafi, Seattle, WA
PIMRC 2008
18 September 2008
2 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
Presentation Outline
Introduction & Problem Statement Current State of the Art Description of Proposed Architecture Instrumentation Methodology Results Conclusion Q & A
3 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
Introduction & Problem Statement Current State of the Art Description of Proposed Architecture Instrumentation Methodology Results Conclusion Q & A
4 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
Mobile-to-Mobile Call
E1-E3: Voice encoders
D1-D3: Voice decoders
Note: In the interest of simplicity, nodes that don’t affect the voice format (MSC and intermediate switches) are not shown.
5 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
Mobile-to-Mobile call with extra vocoders
DCME: Digital Circuit Multiplication Equipment
VoIP: Voice over IP
Note: In the interest of simplicity, nodes that don’t affect the voice format (MSC and intermediate switches) are not shown.
6 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
International Mobile-Mobile Call:Up to five tandem vocoder pairs
Voice quality degrades quickly with increased number of tandem vocoders
Increase not necessarily linear Similar to effect of retransmission of a FAXed
document (quantization error)
Solution: Minimize number of tandem vocoders Tandem Free Operation (TFO) is already part of the
3GPP and 3GPP2 standards, for 2G and 3G equipment.
7 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
Introduction & Problem Statement Current State of the Art Description of Proposed Architecture Instrumentation Methodology Results Conclusion Q & A
8 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
Mobile-to-Mobile Call
9 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
Mobile-to-Mobile Call (TFO setup)
In-band TFO Negotiation
10 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
Mobile-to-Mobile Call with TFO
Reduction from 2 vocoder stages down to 1.
11 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
Introduction & Problem Statement Current State of the Art Description of Proposed Architecture Instrumentation Methodology Results Conclusion Q & A
12 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
International Mobile-Mobile Call
13 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
International Mobile-Mobile Call
14 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
International Mobile-Mobile Call
Reduction from 3 vocoder stages down to 1!
Significantly reduced delay
Much lower-cost DCME/VoIP equipment
15 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
Introduction & Problem Statement Current State of the Art Description of Proposed Architecture Instrumentation Methodology Results Conclusion Q & A
16 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
Requirements
A “clean” 64 KBPS PCM file Serves as voice quality reference file Long enough to give a good estimate
Encoders and decoders for standard GSM and UMTS networks
For full rate (FR), enhanced full rate (EFR), half rate (HR), and different rates of adaptive multirate (AMR)
Must be host-based Available in open source format
Objective voice quality measurement software
17 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ)
Standardized as ITU-T recommendation P.862 (*) Uses psycho-acoustic metrics – attempts to
measure distortions only in the perceptually significant aspects of the voice signal
Calculates an objective voice quality score, and maps it to “a MOS like scale, a single number in the range of –0.5 to 4.5, although for most cases the output range will be between 1.0 and 4.5, the normal range of MOS values …”(*)
(*) ITU-T Rec. P.862, “Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ), an Objective Method for End-to-End Speech Quality Assessment of Narrowband Telephone Networks and Speech Codecs,” Feb 2001
18 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
Instrumentation
3-minute sample file used PESQ software takes 2
input files & generates a single output value
19 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
Introduction & Problem Statement Current State of the Art Description of Proposed Architecture Instrumentation Methodology Results Conclusion Q & A
20 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
Effect of Tandem Vocoders
Applying the same vocoder multiple times Shows the effect of tandem vocoding Simple to simulate, but not common in the real world
Tandem Vocoders
2.60
2.80
3.00
3.20
3.40
3.60
3.80
4.00
1 2 3 4
# of tandem vocoders
PE
SQ
AMR 12.2
EFR
AMR 10.2
GSM-FR
GSM-HR
AMR 4.75
21 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
Two Scenarios
Case 1: High Voice Quality Requirement E2/D2 uses AMR12.2 vocoder For example Tier-1 operator in mature market
Case 2: High Bandwidth Savings Requirement E2/D2 uses AMR4.75 vocoder For example severely congested backhaul, or satellite
links
22 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
Case 1 – High Voice Quality
With TFO: PESQ score of 3.93 (single AMR12.2 vocoder end to end)
EFR AMR122 HR AMR475
EFR 3.49 3.51 3.24 3.19
AMR122 3.55 3.54 3.26 3.21
HR 3.32 3.31 3.08 3.05
AMR475 3.25 3.23 3.02 3.02
Second Mobile Stage (listener)
First Mobile Stage (speaker)
Without TFO:
23 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
Case 2 – High Bandwidth Savings
EFR AMR122 HR AMR475EFR 3.20 3.26 2.98 3.03AMR122 3.23 3.25 2.98 3.02HR 3.09 3.10 2.89 2.91AMR475 3.07 3.06 2.84 2.90
Second Mobile Stage (listener)
First Mobile Stage (speaker)
With TFO: PESQ score of 3.41 (single AMR4.75 vocoder end to end)
Without TFO:
24 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
Introduction & Problem Statement Current State of the Art Description of Proposed Architecture Instrumentation Methodology Results Conclusion Q & A
25 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
Conclusions Tandem vocoders can significantly impact
voice quality And add to the total delay – an effect that has not
been quantified in this study
TFO has been created to address this problem in mobile to mobile calls
TFO can be applied to other scenarios where tandem vocoders (including standard VoIP and proprietary DCME) are in the transmission path
This has many advantages Measureable improvements in voice quality Lower delay Cheaper transmission equipment – fewer vocoders
26 PIMRC 2008Aram Falsafi
Introduction & Problem Statement Current State of the Art Description of Proposed Architecture Instrumentation Methodology Results Conclusion Q & A