imt-advanced relay

41
1 IMT-Advanced Relay Institute for Information Industry (資策會) Research Fellow Kanchei (Ken) Loa (羅耿介) [email protected] 06/04/2010

Upload: others

Post on 03-Feb-2022

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Microsoft PowerPoint - IMT-Advanced Relay-20100604.pptKanchei (Ken) Loa () [email protected]
06/04/2010
2
III’s Contributions in 4G Standards
• IEEE 802.16j (16j Relay) – 253 major contributions had been submitted – 116 contributions had been approved as standard baselines – 37.54% of total approved contributions in 16j – Ranked #2 (Nortel ranked #1)
• IEEE 802.16m (Relay & Femtocell) – 05/2010 – 274 major contributions have been submitted – 141 contributions have been approved as standard baselines
• 3GPP LTE-A (LTE-A Relay) – 05/2010 – 57 major contributions have been submitted – 28 contributions have been treated with 13 approved/agreed
• III has been focus on building relay & femtocell essential patents in IEEE 802.16 and 3GPP LTE-A
3
Relay Applications
Problems: 1. Shadow of buildings 2. Valley between buildings 3. Coverage extension at cell edge
Advantages of Relay • Expands Coverage/Penetration • Improves Capacity and QoS • Lower CAPEX & OPEX approach
to expand WiMAX infrastructure • Decreases MS power consumption
and Increases battery life • Load sharing and multi-path
redundancy: reduces costs • Spectrally efficient architectures:
reduces costly antenna structures
Advantages of Relay • Expands Coverage/Penetration • Improves Capacity and QoS • Lower CAPEX & OPEX approach
to expand WiMAX infrastructure • Decreases MS power consumption
and Increases battery life • Load sharing and multi-path
redundancy: reduces costs • Spectrally efficient architectures:
reduces costly antenna structures
Fixed Infrastructure
1. IEEE 802.16-2009 published in 2009, which incorporated IEEE 802.16j
• Work-in-progress standards 1. IEEE 802.16m Relay
– P802.16m/D6
2. 3GPP LTE-Advanced Relay – 36.912 – 36.814 – 36.806 (RAN2/RAN3 internal TR) – 36.300 (R2-102659 CR to 36.300 on relaying)
9
MR data protocol stack for RS in centralized security mode
MR data protocol stack for RS in distributed security mode
11
TDD versus FDD • In terms of duplex scheme • TDD (Time Division Duplex)
– Transmit and Receive are time-division on single frequency • FDD (Frequency Division Duplex)
– Transmit and Receive are performed on a pair of frequencies • A 802.16 frame structure is divided into a DL subframe and a UL subframe
– In TDD, the UL subframe is followed by the DL subframe – In FDD, the DL subframe and the UL subframe are transmitted on different frequencies
time
frequency
12
STR versus TTR • In terms of RS’s capability of handling dual RF modules • STR (Simultaneous Transmit and Receive) relaying
– Definition in 802.16j /D9 3.121 • a relay mechanism where transmission to subordinate station(s) and reception from the superordinate
station, or transmission to the superordinate station and reception from subordinate station(s) are performed simultaneously.
– RS’s RF module handles TX and RX on distinct RF modules simultaneously, – Able to retain the same frame structure as 802.16e
• TTR (Time-division Transmit and Receive) relaying – Definition in 802.16j /D9 3.123
• a relay mechanism where transmission to subordinate station(s) and reception from the superordinate station, or transmission to the superordinate station and reception from subordinate station(s) is separated in time.
– RS’s RF module handles TX and RX on distinct RF modules at different time – Frame structure may differ from 802.16e
13
Relay/Duplex Modes • TDD/FDD is distinguished by duplex scheme • TTR/STR is distinguished by RS’s relaying capability of
handling dual RF modules
Non-transparent RS • A non-transparent RS transmits preamble, FCH
and DL-/UL-MAP • MS recognizes the non-transparent RS as a BS • Centralized scheduling or distributed scheduling • Capacity enhancement & range extension
Transparent RS • A transparent RS does not transmit preamble,
FCH and DL-/UL-MAP • MS never recognizes the transparent RS as a BS • Centralized scheduling at MR-BS • Capacity enhancement only • UL only RS or UL/DL RS
15
– Transparent or non-transparent – Time-division Transmit & Receive (TTR) or
Simultaneously Transmit & Receive (STR) – Fixed RS or mobile RS – Two-hop or multi-hop – Centralized or distributed scheduling – Centralized or distributed security – Centralized control – RS group
17
20
22
23
24
R6 termination on the RS • R6 logical termination is on the RS
– R6 is expected to be enhanced for 16m by NWG • R6 messages can be carried over AAI_L2-XFER MAC management
message between the RS and BS. – Downlink: BS performs classification, and sends it using AAI_L2-XFER,
addressed to the STID of the RS and with FID=1 – Uplink: RS sends the message using AAI_L2-XFER to the BS with FID=1.
25
forwarded in ARS’s transport flow
ABS interpreates data message and forwards the data in ARS’s transport flow
AMS
26
27
28
29
30
finalize the 16m relay standard • No STR relay in 802.16m/D6
31
LTE-A Relay • LTE-A Relay Node (RN)
1. Type I RN – Range extension – Architecture Studied at RAN1, RAN2 and RAN3
2. Type II RN – Throughput enhancement within an eNB cell – Being discussed in RAN1 – Similar to Transparent RS of 802.16j
33
• Non-transparent • Distributed scheduling • Distributed security • Distributed control
35
LTE-A Type I RN • Type I RN has its own cell ID • Appears as Rel-8 eNB to Rel-8 UEs • TDM Tx/Rx at RN
– Utilize MBFSN subframe for eNB-RN DL transmission – Maintain backward-compatibility to Rel-8 UE – New Un interface for the link between RN & DeNB
DeNBUE RN
Uu Un
IP
UDP
GTP
IP
SCTP
S1-AP
IP
SCTP
X2-AP
X2-AP
X2-CP
SCTP
X2-AP
SCTP
X2-AP
Summary 1. RN is an eNB with a wireless backhaul
connection 2. Easy to implement due to reuse the eNB
functionality 3. Inband and out-band Type-1 relays are in Rel-10
41